Nucleotides,Part LXV,Synthesis of 2′‐Deoxyribonucleoside 5′‐Phosphoramidites: New Building Blocks for the Inverse (5′‐3′)‐Oligonucleotide Approach

The syntheses of the 3′‐O‐(4,4′‐dimethoxytrityl)‐protected 5′‐phosphoramidites 25 – 28 and 5′‐(hydrogen succinates) 29 – 32 , which can be used as monomeric building blocks for the inverse (5′‐3′)‐oligodeoxyribonucleotide synthesis are described (Scheme). These activated nucleosides and nucleotides were obtained by two slightly different four‐step syntheses starting with the base‐protected nucleosides 13 – 20 . For the protection of the aglycon residues, the well‐established 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl (npe) and [2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl (npeoc) groups were used. The assembly of the oligonucleotides required a slightly increased coupling time of 3 min in application of the common protocol (see Table 1). The use of pyridinium hydrochloride as an activator (instead of 1H‐tetrazole) resulted in an extremely shorter activation time of 30 seconds. We established the efficiency of this inverse strategy by the synthesis of the oligonucleotide 3′‐conjugates 33 and 34 which carry lipophilic caps derived from cholesterol and vitamin E, respectively, as well as by the formation of (3′‐3′)‐ and (5′‐5′)‐internucleotide linkages (see Table 2).     

Nucleotides,Part LXVIII,Acetals as New 2′‐O‐Protecting Functions for the Synthesis of Oligoribonucleotides: Synthesis of Monomeric Building Units and Oligoribonucleotides

For the efficient synthesis of oligoribonucleotides by the 5′‐O‐(4,4′‐dimethoxytrityl) phosphoramidite approach, the 2′‐O‐[1‐(benzyloxy)ethyl]acetals 56 – 67 were investigated. Studies with the 2′‐O‐[1‐(benzyloxy)ethyl]‐5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)ribonucleoside 3′‐phosphoramidites 56 – 59 gave, however, only reasonable results. The oligoribonucleotides obtained showed some impurities since the acid stabilities of the acetal and dimethoxytrityl functions are too close to guarantee a high selectivity. A combination of new acid‐labile protected 2′‐O‐protecting groups with the 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl/[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl (npe/npeoc) strategy for base protection was more successful. The synthesis and physical properties of the monomeric building units and their intermediates 8 – 67 and the conditions for the automated generation of homo‐ and mixed oligoribonucleotides is described. The new 2′‐acetal protecting group could be cleaved off in a two step procedure and was designed for levelling their stability with regard to the attached nucleobase as well. Therefore, we used the 1‐{{3‐fluoro‐4‐{{[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl}oxy}benzyl}oxy}ethyl (fnebe) moiety for the protection of 2′‐OH of uridine, and for that of 2′‐OH of A, C, and G, the 1‐{{4‐{{[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl}oxy}benzyl}oxy}ethyl (nebe) residue. After selective deprotection by β‐elimination induced by a strong organic base like DBU, the remaining activated acetal was hydrolyzed under very mild acidic protic conditions, which reduced 2′‐3′ isomerization and chain cleavage. Also storage, handling, and purification of the chemically and enzymatically sensitive oligomers was simplified by this approach.     

Synthesis of Photolabile 5′‐O‐Phosphoramidites for the Photolithographic Production of Microarrays of Inversely Oriented Oligonucleotides

The photolabile 3′‐O‐{[2‐(2‐nitrophenyl)propoxy]carbonyl}‐protected 5′‐phosphoramidites ( 16 – 18 ) were synthesized (see Scheme) for an alternative mode of light‐directed production of oligonucleotide arrays. Because of the characteristics of these monomeric building blocks, photolithographic in situ DNA synthesis occurred in 5′→3′ direction, in agreement with the orientation of enzymatic synthesis. Synthesis yields were as good as those of conventional reactions. The resulting oligonucleotides are attached to the surface via their 5′‐termini, while the 3′‐hydroxy groups are available as substrates for enzymatic reactions such as primer extension upon hybridization of a DNA template (see Fig. 2). The production of such oligonucleotide chips adds new procedural avenues to the growing number of applications of DNA microarrays.     

2′‐Ethynyl‐DNA: Synthesis and Pairing Properties

2‐Ethynyl‐DNA was developed as a potential DNA‐selective oligonucleotide analog. The synthesis of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified nucleosides was achieved starting from properly protected 2′‐ketonucleosides by addition of lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide followed by reduction of the tertiary alcohol. After a series of protecting‐group manipulations, phosphoramidite building blocks suitable for solid‐phase synthesis were obtained. The synthesis of oligonucleotides from these building blocks was successful when a fast deprotection scheme was used. The pairing properties of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified oligonucleotides can be summarized as follows: 1) The 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl modification of pyrimidine nucleosides leads to a strong destabilization in duplexes with DNA as well as with RNA. The likely reason is that the ethynyl group sterically influences the torsional preferences around the glycosidic bond leading to a conformation not suitable for duplex formation. 2) If the modification is introduced in purine nucleosides, no such influence is observed. The pairing properties are not or only slightly changed, and, in some cases (deoxyadenosine homo‐polymers), the desired stabilization of the pairing with a DNA complementary strand and destabilization with an RNA complement is observed. 3) In oligonucleotides of alternating deoxycytidine‐deoxyguanosine sequence, the incorporation of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl deoxyguanosine surprisingly leads to the formation of a left‐handed double helix, irrespective of salt concentration. The rationalization for this behavior is that the ethynyl group locks such duplexes in a left‐handed conformation through steric blockade.     

Ein neuer Zugang zu 2′‐O‐(2‐Methoxyethyl)ribonucleosiden ausgehend von D‐Glucose

A New Access to 2′‐ O ‐(2‐Methoxyethyl)ribonucleosides Starting from D ‐Glucose A new synthesis of 2′‐O‐(2‐methoxyethyl)ribonucleosides, building blocks for second‐generation antisense oligonucleotides, starting from D ‐glucose is presented. The key‐step is the transformation of 3‐O‐methoxyethylallofuranose to 2‐O‐(2‐methoxyethyl)ribose by NaIO₄ oxidation. Together with the 4′‐phenylbenzoyl protecting group, which results in crystalline intermediates, this synthesis provides an easy and cheap access to 2′‐O‐(2‐methoxyethyl)‐substituted ribonucleosides.     

Studies towards the Synthesis of Alkyl N‐(4‐Nitrophenyl)‐3/2‐oxomorpholine‐2/3‐carboxylates

The syntheses of methyl 4‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐oxomorpholine‐2‐carboxylate ( 3a ) and ethyl 4‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐2‐oxomorpholine‐3‐carboxylate ( 5b ), important building blocks for the synthesis of factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban analogs with potential dual antithrombotic activity, via Rh₂(OAc)₄‐catalyzed O? H and N? H carbene insertion reactions are described.     

Nucleotides,Part LXVII,The 2‐Cyanoethyl and (2‐Cyanoethoxy)carbonyl Group for Base Protection in Nucleoside and Nucleotide Chemistry

The amino functions of the common 2′‐deoxyribo‐ and ribonucleosides were blocked by the (2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl group on treatment with 2‐cyanoethyl carbonochloridate ( 5 ) or 1‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐3‐methyl‐1H‐imidazolium chloride ( 6 ) leading to 7 , 18 , 8 , 19 , 9 , and 20 . In 2′‐deoxyguanosine, the amide group was additionally blocked at the O⁶ position by the 2‐cyanoethyl (→ 27 ) and 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl group (→ 31 , 32 ). Comparative kinetic studies regarding the cleavage of the ce/ceoc and npe/npeoc group by β‐elimination revealed valuable information about the ease and sequential deprotection of the various blocking groups at different sites of the nucleobases. Besides the 5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)‐protected 3′‐(2‐cyanoethyl diisopropylphosphoramidites) 38 and 39 of N⁴‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐2′‐deoxycytidine and N⁶‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐2′‐deoxyadenosine, respectively, the N²‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐2′‐deoxy‐O⁶‐[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl]guanosine analog 40 is recommended as building block for oligo‐2′‐deoxyribonucleotide synthesis.     

A Convenient Protocol for the Synthesis of 2‐(2′‐Hydroxy‐5′‐carboxyphenyl)‐2H‐benzotriazole to Avoid Decarboxylation When Using p‐Hydroxybenzoic Acid as Coupling Component

In the study of the synthesis of 2‐(2′‐hydroxy‐5′‐carboxyphenyl)‐2H‐benzotriazole, we found that decarboxy intermediate‐4‐((2‐nitrophenyl)diazenyl)phenol was obtained when using p‐hydroxybenzoic acid as coupling component. A convenient protocol for the synthesis of 2‐(2′‐hydroxy‐5′‐carboxyphenyl)‐2H‐benzotriazole is reported with methyl‐p‐hydroxybenzoate as coupling component. Different dizao components and different coupling components were also used for further investigation of decarboxylation.     

Synthesis of 2′‐O‐[(Triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (= tom)‐Protected Ribonucleoside Phosphoramidites Containing Various Nucleobase Analogues

The first results of a study aiming at an efficient preparation of a large variety of 2′‐O‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl(= tom)‐protected ribonucleoside phosphoramidite building blocks containing modified nucleobases are reported. All of the here presented nucleosides have already been incorporated into RNA sequences by several other groups, employing 2′‐O‐tbdms‐ or 2′‐O‐tom‐protected phosphoramidite building blocks (tbdms = (tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl). We now optimized existing reactions, developed some new and shorter synthetic strategies, and sometimes introduced other nucleobase‐protecting groups. The 2′‐O‐tom, 5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)‐protected ribonucleosides N²‐acetylisocytidine 5 , O²‐(diphenylcarbamoyl)‐N⁶‐isobutyrylisoguanosine 8 , N⁶‐isobutyryl‐N²‐(methoxyacetyl)purine‐2,6‐diamine ribonucleoside (= N⁸‐isobutyryl‐2‐[(methoxyacetyl)amino]adenosine) 11 , 5‐methyluridine 13 , and 5,6‐dihydrouridine 15 were prepared by first introducing the nucleobase protecting groups and the dimethoxytrityl group, respectively, followed by the 2′‐O‐tom group (Scheme 1). The other presented 2′‐O‐tom, 5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)‐protected ribonucleosides inosine 17 , 1‐methylinosine 18 , N⁶‐isopent‐2‐enyladenosine 21 , N⁶‐methyladenosine 22 , N⁶,N⁶‐dimethyladenosine 23 , 1‐methylguanosine 25 , N²‐methylguanosine 27 , N²,N²‐dimethylguanosine 29 , N⁶‐(chloroacetyl)‐1‐methyladenosine 32 , N⁶‐{{{(1S,2R)‐2‐{[(tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl]oxy}‐1‐{[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl}propyl}amino}carbonyl}}adenosine 34 (derived from L ‐threonine) and N⁴‐acetyl‐5‐methylcytidine 36 were prepared by nucleobase transformation reactions from standard, already 2′‐O‐tom‐protected ribonucleosides (Schemes 2–4). Finally, all these nucleosides were transformed into the corresponding phosphoramidites 37 – 52 (Scheme 5), which are fully compatible with the assembly and deprotection conditions for standard RNA synthesis based on 2′‐O‐tom‐protected monomeric building blocks.     

Synthesis,Base Pairing,and Structural Transitions of Oligodeoxyribonucleotides Containing 8-Aza-2′-deoxyguanosine

The synthesis of oligonucleotides containing 8-aza-2′-deoxyguanosine (z⁸G_d; 1 ) or its N⁸-regioisomer z⁸G_d^* ( 2 ) instead of 2′-deoxyguanosine (G_d) is described. For this purpose, the NH₂ group of 1 and 2 was protected with a (dimethylamino)methylidene residue (→ 5, 6 ), a 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl group was introduced at 5′-OH (→ 7, 8 ), and the phosphonates 3a and 4 as well as the phosphoramidite 3b were prepared. These building blocks were used in solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis. The oligonucleotides were characterized by enzymatic hydrolysis and melting curves (T_m values). The thermodynamic data of the oligomers 12–15 indicate that duplexes were stabilized when 1 was replacing G_d. The aggregation of d(T-G-G-G-G-T) ( 18 ) was studied by RP 18 HPLC, gel electrophoresis and CD spectroscopy and compared with that of oligonucleotides containing an increasing number of z⁸G_d residues instead of G_d. Similarly to [d(C-G)]₃ ( 12a ), the hexamer d(C-z⁸G-C-z⁸G-C-G) ( 14 ) underwent salt-dependent B-Z transition.     

Oligonucleotides Containing 7‐Deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine: Synthesis,Base Protection,and Base‐Pair Stability

Oligonucleotides incorporating 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 3 ) and 2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 1 ) were prepared by solid‐phase synthesis using the phosphoramidites 6 – 9 and 16 which were protected with allyl, diphenylcarbamoyl, or 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl groups. Among the various groups, only the 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl group was applicable to 7‐deazaxanthine protection being removed with 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU) by β‐elimination, while the deprotection of the allyl residue with Pd⁰ catalyst or the diphenylcarbamoyl group with ammonia failed. Contrarily, the allyl group was found to be an excellent protecting group for 2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 1 ). The base pairing of nucleoside 3 with the four canonical DNA constituents as well as with 3‐bromo‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine‐4,6‐diamine ( 4 ) within the 12‐mer duplexes was studied, showing that 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 3 ) has the same universal base‐pairing properties as 2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 1 ). Contrary to the latter, it is extremely stable at the N‐glycosylic bond, while compound 1 is easily hydrolyzed under slightly acidic conditions. Due to the pK_a values 5.7 ( 1 ) and 6.7 ( 3 ), both compounds form monoanions under neutral conditions (95% for 1 ; 65% for 3 ). Although both compounds form monoanions at pH 7.0, pH‐dependent T_m measurements showed that the base‐pair stability of 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 3 ) with dT is pH‐independent. This indicates that the 2‐oxo group is not involved in base‐pair formation.     

Synthesis of the Anticodon Hairpin tRNAfMet Containing N‐{[9‐(β‐D‐Ribofuranosyl)‐9H‐purin‐6‐yl]carbamoyl}‐L‐threonine (=N6‐{{[(1S,2R)‐1‐Carboxy‐2‐hydroxypropyl]amino}carbonyl}adenosine,t6A)

As part of our studies on the structure of yeast ^tRNA_f^Met, we investigated the incorporation of N‐{[9‐(β‐D ‐ribofuranosyl)‐9H‐purin‐6‐yl]carbamoyl}‐L ‐threonine (t⁶A) in the loop of a RNA 17‐mer hairpin. The carboxylic function of the L ‐threonine moiety of t⁶A was protected with a 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl group, and a (tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl group was used for the protection of its secondary OH group. The 2′‐OH function of the standard ribonucleotide building blocks was protected with a [(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl group. Removal of the base‐labile protecting groups of the final RNA with 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU) and then with MeNH₂ was done under carefully controlled conditions to prevent hydrolysis of the carbamate function, leading to loss of the L ‐threonine moiety.     

Nucleotides,Part LXVI , β‐Heteroarylethyl Groups – New Phosphate‐Protecting Groups for Phosphotriester Chemistry

The β‐heteroaryl‐substituted ethanols 6 – 10 were synthesized and, together with pyridine‐2‐ethanols and pyridine‐4‐ethanols, were tested as a new type of phosphate‐protecting groups in the synthesis of oligonucleotides by the phosphotriester approach. The synthesis of 5′‐O‐(monomethoxytrityl)thymidine 3′‐(β‐heteroarylethyl 2,5‐dichlorophenyl phosphates) 13 – 17 and 21 provided useful monomeric building blocks in which the various blocking groups could be removed selectively by acid (MeOTr), oximate (2,5‐dichlorophenyl phosphate), and 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU) (heteroarylethyl phosphate) treatment. The new, fully blocked dimers 38 – 41 , with β‐heteroarylethyl protecting groups in the phosphate moiety, were synthesized. The β‐heteroarylethyl groups show a broad range of stability towards base treatment in aprotic solvents depending upon the activation of the H−C(β) atoms by the heterocyclic moiety.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Oligonucleotides Containing 2′‐Deoxyxanthosine Using Phosphoramidite Chemistry

Oligodeoxynucleotides containing 2′‐deoxyxanthosine (X_d) were synthesized in good yield from a O²,O⁶‐bis[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl](NPE)‐protected phosphoramidite of X_d. Attempts to synthesize a O⁶‐monoNPE‐protected phosphoramidite resulted in formation of a major by‐product. The NPE protecting groups were removed by treatment with oximate ion after other protecting groups were removed with aqueous NH₄OH solution. The composition of the synthetic oligonucleotides was verified by enzymatic degradation and MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry. The efficacy of this procedure allowed isolation of oligodeoxynucleotides containing multiple X_d residues.     

Novel Fluoride‐Labile Nucleobase‐Protecting Groups for the Synthesis of 3′(2′)‐O‐Aminoacylated RNA Sequences

With the aim to develop a general approach to a total synthesis of aminoacylated t‐RNAs and analogues, we describe the synthesis of stabilized, aminoacylated RNA fragments, which, upon ligation, could lead to aminoacylated t‐RNA structures. Novel RNA phosphoramidites with fluoride‐labile 2′‐O‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (=tom) sugar‐protecting and N‐{{2‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]benzyl}oxy}carbonyl (=tboc) base‐protecting groups were prepared (Schemes 4 and 5), as well as a solid support containing an immobilized N⁶‐tboc‐protected adenosine with an orthogonal (photolabile) 2′‐O‐[(S)‐1‐(2‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]methyl (=(S)‐npeom) group (Scheme 6). From these building blocks, a hexameric oligoribonucleotide was prepared by automated synthesis under standard conditions (Scheme 7). After the detachment from the solid support, the resulting fully protected sequence 34 was aminoacylated with L ‐phenylalanine derivatives carrying photolabile N‐protecting groups (→ 42 and 43 ; Scheme 9). Upon removal of the fluoride‐labile sugar‐ and nucleobase‐protecting groups, the still stabilized, partially with the photolabile group protected precursors 44 and 45 , respectively, of an aminoacylated RNA sequence were obtained (Scheme 9 and Fig. 3). Photolysis of 45 under mild conditions resulted in the efficient formation of the 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated RNA sequence 46 (Fig. 4). Additionally, we carried out model investigations concerning the stability of ester bonds of aminoacylated ribonucleotide derivatives under acidic conditions (Table) and established conditions for the purification and handling of 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated RNA sequences and their stabilized precursors.     

A Simple Synthesis of 5‐(2‐Aminophenyl)‐1H‐pyrazoles

A four‐step synthesis of 1‐substituted 5‐(2‐aminophenyl)‐1H‐pyrazoles 5 as a novel type of histamine analogs and versatile building blocks for further transformations was developed. The synthesis starts from commercially available 2‐nitroacetophenone ( 12 ), which is converted into the enamino ketone 13 as the key intermediate. Cyclization of the key intermediate 13 with monosubstituted hydrazines 14a – 14l afforded the 5‐(2‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐pyrazoles 17a – 17l . Finally, catalytic hydrogenation of the nitro compounds 17a, 17c – 17e , and 17g – 17j furnished the title compounds 5a, 5c – 5e , and 5g – 5j , respectively, in good yields. As demonstrated by some further transformations, additional functionalization of compounds 17 and 5 is feasible, either by electrophilic substitution at C(4) of the pyrazole ring, or at the NH₂ group.     

3-Deaza-2′-deoxyadenosine: Synthesis via 4-(methylthio)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine 2′-deoxyribonucleosides and properties of oligonucleotides

The synthesis of 4-(methylthio)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine 2′-deoxy-β-D -ribonucleosides 2 and 9 and the conversion of the N¹-isomer 2 into the 2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxyribonucleoside 3a or (via 7 ) 3-deaza-2′-deoxyadenosine ( 1 ) is described. Phosphonate building blocks of 1 were employed in solid-phase synthesis of self-complementary base-modified oligonucleotides. Their properties were studied with regard to duplex stability and hydrolysis by the restriction enzyme Eco RI.     

Oligonucleotides Functionalized by Fluorescein and Rhodamine Dyes: Michael Addition of Methyl Acrylate to 2′‐Deoxypseudouridine

The 2′‐deoxypseudouridine ( 5 ) was functionalized at N(1) with methyl acrylate by Michael addition. The resulting methyl 2′‐deoxypseudouridine‐1‐propanoate ( 6 ) was converted to the phosphoramidite 8 and to the amino‐functionalized derivative 9 , which was transformed into the fluorescein‐labeled phosphoramidites 14 and 16 . Fluorescent oligonucleotides were synthesized either from these building blocks or by post‐synthetic modification of oligomers containing 2′‐deoxypseudouridine subunits. The stability of oligonucleotide duplexes was determined from the melting profiles, measured by UV‐ or VIS‐light absorbance, as well as from the fluorescence emission spectra. While small spacer residues did not affect the thermal stability of the 2′‐deoxypseudouridine‐containing duplexes, large dye residues led to destabilization.     

Nucleosides and Oligonucleotides with Diynyl Side Chains: Base Pairing and Functionalization of 2′‐Deoxyuridine Derivatives by the Copper(I)‐Catalyzed Alkyne?Azide ‘Click’ Cycloaddition

Oligonucleotides containing the 5‐substituted 2′‐deoxyuridines 1b or 1d bearing side chains with terminal C?C bonds are described, and their duplex stability is compared with oligonucleotides containing the 5‐alkynyl compounds 1a or 1c with only one nonterminal C?C bond in the side chain. For this, 5‐iodo‐2′‐deoxyuridine ( 3 ) and diynes or alkynes were employed as starting materials in the Sonogashira cross‐coupling reaction (Scheme 1). Phosphoramidites 2b – d were prepared (Scheme 3) and used as building blocks in solid‐phase synthesis. T_m Measurements demonstrated that DNA duplexes containing the octa‐1,7‐diynyl side chain or a diprop‐2‐ynyl ether residue, i.e., containing 1b or 1d , are more stable than those containing only one triple bond, i.e., 1a or 1c (Table 3). The diyne‐modified nucleosides were employed in further functionalization reactions by using the protocol of the Cu^I‐catalyzed Huisgen–Meldal–Sharpless [2+3] cycloaddition (‘click chemistry’) (Scheme 2). An aliphatic azide, i. e., 3′‐azido‐3′‐deoxythymidine (AZT; 4 ), as well as the aromatic azido compound 5 were linked to the terminal alkyne group resulting in 1H‐1,2,3‐triazole‐modified derivatives 6 and 7 , respectively (Scheme 2), of which 6 forms a stable duplex DNA (Table 3). The Husigen–Meldal–Sharpless cycloaddition was also performed with oligonucleotides (Schemes 4 and 5).     

1,7-Dideaza-2′-deoxyadenosine: Building blocks for solid-phase synthesis and secondary structure of base-modified oligodeoxyribonucleotides

The 1,7-dideaza-2′-deoxyadenosine (c¹c⁷A_d; 1 ) was converted into building blocks 3a , b for solid-phase oligodeoxyribonucleotide synthesis. Testing various N-protecting groups – benzoyl, phenoxyacetyl, [(fluoren-9-yl)methoxy]carbonyl, and (dimethylamino)methylidene – only the latter two were found to be suitable ( 1 → 4b, d ). Ensuing 4,4′-dimethoxytritylation of 4d and phosphitylation afforded the 3′-phosphonate 3a or the 3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)diisopropylphosphoramidite] 3b . Self-complementary oligonucleotides with alternating dA or c¹c⁷A_d and dT residues ( 7 and 8 ) as well as palindromic oligomers such as d(C-G-C-G-c¹c⁷ A-c¹c⁷ A-T-T-C-G-C-G) ( 10 ) and d(G-T-A-G-c¹c⁷ A-c¹c⁷ A-T-T-C-T-A-C) ( 12 ) were synthesized. Duplex stability was decreased because 1 cannot form Watson-Crick or Hoogsteen base pairs if incorporated into oligonucleotides. On the other hand, the structural modifications in 10 and 12 forced these palindromic oligomers to form hairpin structures.