The Cyclo‐β‐Tetrapeptide (β‐HPhe‐β‐HThr‐β‐HLys‐β‐HTrp): Synthesis,NMR Structure in Methanol Solution,and Affinity for Human Somatostatin Receptors

The known solid‐state structure (Fig. 1, top) of cyclo(β‐HAla)₄ was used to model the structure of the title compound 1 as a prospective somatostatin mimic (Fig. 1, bottom). The synthesis started with the N‐protected natural amino acids Boc‐Phe‐OH, Boc‐Trp‐OH, Boc‐Lys(2‐Cl‐Z)‐OH, and Boc‐Thr(OBn)‐OH, which were homologated to the corresponding β‐amino‐acid derivatives (Scheme 1) and coupled to the β‐tetrapeptide Boc‐β‐HTrp‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HThr(OBn)‐β‐HLys(2‐Cl‐Z)‐OMe ( 16 ); the (N‐Me)‐β‐HThr‐(N‐Me)‐β‐HPhe analog 17 was also prepared. C‐ and N‐terminal deprotection and cyclization through the pentafluorophenyl ester gave the insoluble β‐tetrapeptide with protected Thr and Lys side chains ( 18 ). Solubilization and debenzylation could only be effected in LiCl‐containing THF (ca. 10% yield; with ca. 55% recovery). HPLC Purification provided a sample of the title compound 1 , the structure of which, as determined by NMR‐spectroscopy (Fig. 2, left) was drastically different from the `theoretical' model (Fig. 1). There is a transannular H‐bond dividing the macrocyclic 16‐membered ring, thus forming a ten‐ and a twelve‐membered H‐bonded ring, the former mimicking, or actually being superimposable on, an α‐peptidic so‐called β‐turn. Still, the four side chains occupy equatorial positions on the ring, as planned, albeit with somewhat different geometry as compared to the `original'. The cyclo‐β‐tetrapeptide has micromolar affinities to the human somatostatin receptors (hsst 1 – 5). Thus, we have demonstrated for the first time that it is possible to mimic a natural peptide hormone with a small β‐peptide. Furthermore, we have discovered a simple way to construct the ubiquitous β‐turn motif with β‐peptides (which are known to be stable to mammalian peptidases).     

New Open‐Chain and Cyclic Tetrapeptides,Consisting of α‐, β2‐, and β3‐Amino‐Acid Residues,as Somatostatin Mimics – A Survey

Cyclo‐β‐tetrapeptides are known to adopt a conformation with an intramolecular transannular hydrogen bond in solution. Analysis of this structure reveals that incorporation of a β²‐amino‐acid residue should lead to mimics of ‘α‐peptidic β‐turns’ (cf. A, B, C ). It is also known that short‐chain mixed β/α‐peptides with appropriate side chains can be used to mimic interactions between α‐peptidic hairpin turns and G protein‐coupled receptors. Based on these facts, we have now prepared a number of cyclic and open‐chain tetrapeptides, 7 – 20 , consisting of α‐, β²‐, and β³‐amino‐acid residues, which bear the side chains of Trp and Lys, and possess backbone configurations such that they should be capable of mimicking somatostatin in its affinity for the human SRIF receptors (hsst_1–5). All peptides were prepared by solid‐phase coupling by the Fmoc strategy. For the cyclic peptides, the three‐dimensional orthogonal methodology (Scheme 3) was employed with best success. The new compounds were characterized by high‐resolution mass spectrometry, NMR and CD spectroscopy, and, in five cases, by a full NMR‐solution‐structure determination (in MeOH or H₂O; Fig. 4). The affinities of the new compounds for the receptors hsst_1–5 were determined by competition with [¹²⁵I]LTT‐SRIF₂₈ or [¹²⁵I] [Tyr¹⁰]‐CST₁₄. In Table 1, the data are listed, together with corresponding values of all β‐ and γ‐peptidic somatostatin/Sandostatin^® mimics measured previously by our groups. Submicromolar affinities have been achieved for most of the human SRIF receptors hsst_1–5. Especially high, specific binding affinities for receptor hsst₄ (which is highly expressed in lung and brain tissue, although still of unknown function!) was observed with some of the β‐peptidic mimics. In view of the fact that numerous peptide‐activated G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) recognize ligands with turn structure (Table 2), the results reported herein are relevant far beyond the realm of somatostatin: many other peptide GPCRs should be ‘reached’ with β‐ and γ‐peptidic mimics as well, and these compounds are proteolytically and metabolically stable, and do not need to be cell‐penetrating for this purpose (Fig. 5).     

Preparation of β2‐Homotryptophan Derivatives for β‐Peptide Synthesis

In view of the prominent role of the 1H‐indol‐3‐yl side chain of tryptophan in peptides and proteins, it is important to have the appropriately protected homologs H‐β² HTrp OH and H‐β³ HTrp OH (Fig.) available for incorporation in β‐peptides. The β²‐HTrp building block is especially important, because β²‐amino acid residues cause β‐peptide chains to fold to the unusual 12/10 helix or to a hairpin turn. The preparation of Fmoc and Z β²‐HTrp(Boc) OH by Curtius degradation (Scheme 1) of a succinic acid derivative is described (Schemes 2–4). To this end, the (S)‐4‐isopropyl‐3‐[(N‐Boc‐indol‐3‐yl)propionyl]‐1,3‐oxazolidin‐2‐one enolate is alkylated with Br CH₂CO₂Bn (Scheme 3). Subsequent hydrogenolysis, Curtius degradation, and removal of the Evans auxiliary group gives the desired derivatives of (R)‐H β²‐HTrp OH (Scheme 4). Since the (R)‐form of the auxiliary is also available, access to (S)‐β²‐HTrp‐containing β‐peptides is provided as well.     

Design,Synthesis, NMR‐Solution and X‐Ray Crystal Structure of N‐Acyl‐γ‐dipeptide Amides That Form a βII′‐Type Turn

Conformational analysis of γ‐amino acids with substituents in the 2‐position reveals that an N‐acyl‐γ‐dipeptide amide built of two enantiomeric residues of unlike configuration will form a 14‐membered H‐bonded ring, i.e., a γ‐peptidic turn (Figs. 1 – 3). The diastereoselective preparation of the required building blocks was achieved by alkylation of the doubly lithiated N‐Boc‐protected 4‐aminoalkanoates, which, in turn, are readily available from the corresponding (R)‐ or (S)‐α‐amino acids (Scheme 1). Coupling two such γ‐amino acid derivatives gave N‐acetyl and N‐[(tert‐butoxy)carbonyl] (Boc) dipeptide methyl amides ( 1 and 10 , resp.; Fig. 2, Scheme 2); both formed crystals suitable for X‐ray analysis, which confirmed the turn structures in the solid state (Fig. 4 and Table 4). NMR Analysis of the acetyl derivative 1 in CD₃OH, with full chemical‐shift and coupling assignments, and, including a 300‐ms ROESY measurement, revealed that the predicted turn structure is also present in solution (Fig. 5 and Tables 1 – 3). The results described here are yet another piece of evidence for the fact that more stable secondary structures are formed with a decreasing number of residues, and with increasing degree of predictability, as we go from α‐ to β‐ to γ‐peptides. Implications of the superimposable geometries of the actual turn segments (with amide bonds flanked by two quasi‐equatorial substituents) in α‐, β‐, and γ‐peptidic turns are discussed.     

Synthesis of β3‐Peptides and Mixed α/β3‐Peptides by Thioligation

Five β‐peptide thioesters ( 1 – 5 , containing 3, 4, 10 residues) were prepared by manual solid‐phase synthesis and purified by reverse‐phase preparative HPLC. A β‐undecapeptide ( 6 ) and an α‐undecapeptide ( 7 ) with N‐terminal β³‐HCys and Cys residues were prepared by manual and machine synthesis, respectively. Coupling of the thioesters with the cysteine derivatives in the presence of PhSH (Scheme and Fig. 1) in aqueous solution occurred smoothly and quantitatively. Pentadeca‐ and heneicosapeptides ( 8 – 10 ) were isolated, after preparative RP‐HPLC purification, in yields of up to 60%. Thus, the so‐called native chemical ligation works well with β‐peptides, producing larger β³‐ and α/β³‐mixed peptides. Compounds 1 – 10 were characterized by high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HR‐MS) and by CD spectroscopy, including temperature and concentration dependence. β‐Peptide 9 with 21 residues shows an intense negative Cotton effect near 210 nm but no zero‐crossing above 190 nm, (Figs. 2–4), which is characteristic of β‐peptidic 3₁₄‐helical structures. Comparison of the CD spectra of the mixed α/β‐pentadecapeptide ( 10 ) and a helical α‐peptide (Fig. 5) indicate the presence of an α‐peptidic 3.6₁₃ helix.     

β‐Peptide Conjugates: Syntheses and CD and NMR Investigations of β/α‐Chimeric Peptides,of a DPA‐β‐Decapeptide,and of a PEGylated β‐Heptapeptide

β³‐Peptides consisting of six, seven, and ten homologated proteinogenic amino acid residues have been attached to an α‐heptapeptide (all d‐ amino acid residues; 4 ), to a hexaethylene glycol chain (PEGylation; 5c ), and to dipicolinic acid (DPA derivative 6 ), respectively. The conjugation of the β‐peptides with the second component was carried out through the N‐termini in all three cases. According to NMR analysis (CD₃OH solutions), the (M)‐3₁₄‐helical structure of the β‐peptidic segments was unscathed in all three chimeric compounds (Figs. 2, 4, and 5). The α‐peptidic section of the α/β‐peptide was unstructured, and so was the oligoethylene glycol chain in the PEGylated compound. Thus, neither does the appendage influence the β‐peptidic secondary structure, nor does the latter cause any order in the attached oligomers to be observed by this method of analysis. A similar conclusion may be drawn from CD spectra (Figs. 1, 3, and 5). These results bode well for the development of delivery systems involving β‐peptides.     

β‐Hairpins Generated from Hybrid Peptide Sequences Containing both α‐ and β‐Amino Acids

The incorporation of the β‐amino acid residues into specific positions in the strands and β‐turn segments of peptide hairpins is being systematically explored. The presence of an additional torsion variable about the C(α) C(β) bond (θ) enhances the conformational repertoire in β‐residues. The conformational analysis of three designed peptide hairpins composed of α/β‐hybrid segments is described: Boc‐Leu‐Val‐Val‐^DPro‐β Phe ‐Leu‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 1 ), Boc‐Leu‐Val‐β Val ‐^DPro‐Gly‐β Leu ‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 2 ), and Boc‐Leu‐Val‐β Phe ‐Val‐^DPro‐Gly‐Leu‐β Phe ‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 3 ). 500‐MHz ¹H‐NMR Analysis supports a preponderance of β‐hairpin conformation in solution for all three peptides, with critical cross‐strand NOEs providing evidence for the proposed structures. The crystal structure of peptide 2 reveals a β‐hairpin conformation with two β‐residues occupying facing, non‐H‐bonded positions in antiparallel β‐strands. Notably, βVal(3) adopts a gauche conformation about the C(α) C(β) bond (θ=+65°) without disturbing cross‐strand H‐bonding. The crystal structure of 2 , together with previously published crystal structures of peptides 3 and Boc‐β Phe ‐β Phe ‐^DPro‐Gly‐β Phe ‐β Phe ‐OMe, provide an opportunity to visualize the packing of peptide sheets with local ‘polar segments' formed as a consequence of reversal peptide‐bond orientation. The available structural evidence for hairpins suggests that β‐residues can be accommodated into nucleating turn segments and into both the H‐bonding and non‐H‐bonding positions on the strands.     

Stereoselective Preparation of 3‐Amino‐2‐fluoro Carboxylic Acid Derivatives,and Their Incorporation in Tetrahydropyrimidin‐4(1H)‐ones,and in Open‐Chain and Cyclic β‐Peptides

The preparation of (2S,3S)‐ and (2R,3S)‐2‐fluoro and of (3S)‐2,2‐difluoro‐3‐amino carboxylic acid derivatives, 1 – 3 , from alanine, valine, leucine, threonine, and β³h‐alanine (Schemes 1 and 2, Table) is described. The stereochemical course of (diethylamino)sulfur trifluoride (DAST) reactions with N,N‐dibenzyl‐2‐amino‐3‐hydroxy and 3‐amino‐2‐hydroxy carboxylic acid esters is discussed (Fig. 1). The fluoro‐β‐amino acid residues have been incorporated into pyrimidinones ( 11 – 13 ; Fig. 2) and into cyclic β‐tri‐ and β‐tetrapeptides 17 – 19 and 21 – 23 (Scheme 3) with rigid skeletons, so that reliable structural data (bond lengths, bond angles, and Karplus parameters) can be obtained. β‐Hexapeptides Boc[(2S)‐β³hXaa(αF)]₆OBn and Boc[β³hXaa(α,αF₂)]₆‐OBn, 24 – 26 , with the side chains of Ala, Val, and Leu, have been synthesized (Scheme 4), and their CD spectra (Fig. 3) are discussed. Most compounds and many intermediates are fully characterized by IR‐ and ¹H‐, ¹³C‐ and ¹⁹F‐NMR spectroscopy, by MS spectrometry, and by elemental analyses, [α]_D and melting‐point values.     

Solid‐Phase Synthesis of a β‐Dodecapeptide with Seven Functionalized Side Chains and CD‐Spectroscopic Evidence for a Dramatic Structural Switch When Going from Water to Methanol Solution

An all‐β³‐dodecapeptide with a protected N‐terminal thiol‐anchoring group and with seven side chains has been synthesized in multi‐mg amounts by the manual solid‐phase technique, applying Fmoc methodology and the Wang resin. The sequence is β‐HLys‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HTyr‐β‐HLeu‐β‐HLys‐β‐HSer‐β‐HLys‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HSer‐β‐HVal‐β‐HLys‐β‐HAla‐OH (from N‐ to C‐terminus; see 1 ). The functional groups in the side chains of the building blocks were Boc (β‐HLys) or t‐Bu ether (β‐HSer, β‐HTyr) protected to allow for simultaneous deprotection and detachment from the resin with trifluoroacetic acid. All coupling steps were achieved with HBTU (=O‐(1H‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl)‐1,1,3,3‐tetramethyl uronium hexafluorophosphate)/HOBt (=1‐hydroxy‐1H‐benzotriazole) in DMF. For Fmoc (=(9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)methoxycarbonyl) deprotection, a protocol was developed to surmount the previously reported problems arising in solid‐phase synthesis of β‐peptides when the chain length exceeds seven or eight amino‐acid moieties: for up to seven amino acids, a 20% solution of piperidine in DMF was used for removal of Fmoc; for the subsequent five amino acids, DBU and piperidine were employed for complete deprotection. The crude product was purified by preparative reversed‐phase HPLC, and the yield of pure β‐dodecapeptide derivative ( 1 ) was 23%. As the compound is well‐soluble in H₂O, it was characterized by ¹H‐NMR (in MeOH and H₂O), ¹³C‐NMR (in MeOH), and CD spectroscopy (in MeOH and in H₂O at pH values ranging from 3.5 to 11), and its molecular weight and composition were confirmed by high‐resolution mass spectrometry (Figs. 1 – 4). In MeOH solution, the β‐dodecapeptide exhibits the expected CD pattern typical of an (M)‐3₁₄‐helical secondary structure. In H₂O, however, the characteristic trough near 215 nm is missing in the CD spectrum, only a strong positive Cotton effect at 202 nm was observed, indicating the presence of β‐peptidic secondary structures, containing ten‐membered H‐bonded rings, such as the 12/10 helix (Fig. 4, right) or the hairpin. Only a detailed NMR solution‐structure analysis will provide the clues necessary for understanding the effects leading to the observed dramatic structural change of the highly functionalized β‐dodecapeptide described.     

Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis of β‐Lactams and Cyclo‐β‐dipeptides

Different cyclo‐β‐dipeptides were prepared from corresponding N‐substituted β‐alanine derivatives under mild conditions using PhPOCl₂ as activating agent in benzene and Et₃N as base. To evaluate β³‐substituent influence, the amino acids 7 – 26 were synthesized, and a β‐lactam formation reaction was carried out instead of cyclo‐β‐dipeptide formation. The crystal structures of three derivatives of cyclo‐β‐peptides and one β‐lactam are presented.     

Synthesis,CD Spectra,and Enzymatic Stability of β2‐Oligoazapeptides Prepared from (S)‐2‐Hydrazino Carboxylic Acids Carrying the Side Chains of Val,Ala, and Leu

β‐Peptides offer the unique possibility to incorporate additional heteroatoms into the peptidic backbone (Figs. 1 and 2). We report here the synthesis and spectroscopic investigations of β²‐peptide analogs consisting of (S)‐3‐aza‐β‐amino acids carrying the side chains of Val, Ala, and Leu. The hydrazino carboxylic acids were prepared by a known method: Boc amidation of the corresponding N‐benzyl‐L ‐α‐amino acids with an oxaziridine (Scheme 1). Couplings and fragment coupling of the 3‐benzylaza‐β²‐amino acids and a corresponding tripeptide (N‐Boc/C‐OMe strategy) with common peptide‐coupling reagents in solution led to β²‐di, β²‐tri‐, and β²‐hexaazapeptide derivatives, which could be N‐debenzylated ( 4 – 9 ; Schemes 2–4). The new compounds were identified by optical rotation, and IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, and CD spectroscopy (Figs. 4 and 5) and high‐resolution mass spectrometry, and, in one case, by X‐ray crystallography (Fig. 3). In spite of extensive measurements under various conditions (temperatures, solvents), it was not possible to determine the secondary structure of the β²‐azapeptides by NMR spectroscopy (overlapping and broad signals, fast exchange between the two types of NH protons!). The CD spectra of the N‐Boc and C‐OMe terminally protected hexapeptide analog 9 in MeOH and in H₂O (at different pH) might arise from a (P)‐3₁₄‐helical structure. The N‐Boc‐β²‐tri and N‐Boc‐β²‐hexaazapeptide esters, 7 and 9 , were shown to be stable for 48 h against the following peptidases: pronase, proteinase K, chymotrypsin, trypsin, carboxypeptidase A, and 20S proteasome.     

NMR‐Structural Investigations of a β3‐Dodecapeptide with Proteinogenic Side Chains in Methanol and in Aqueous Solutions

The structural properties of an all‐β³‐dodecapeptide with the sequence H‐β‐HLys(N^ε‐CO(CH₂)₃‐S Acm)‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HTyr‐β‐HLeu‐β‐HLys‐β‐HSer‐β‐HLys‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HSer‐β‐HVal‐β‐HLys‐β‐HAla‐OH ( 1 ) have been studied by two‐dimensional homonuclear ¹H‐NMR and by CD spectroscopy. In MeOH solution, high‐resolution NMR spectroscopy showed that the β‐dodecapeptide forms an (M)‐3₁₄‐helix, and the CD spectrum corresponds to the pattern expected for an (M)‐3₁₄‐helical secondary structure. In aqueous solution, however, the peptide adopts a predominantly extended conformation without regular secondary‐structure elements, which is in agreement with the absence of the characteristic trough near 215 nm in the CD spectrum. The NMR and CD measurements with solutions of 1 in MeOH containing 3M urea further indicated that the peptide retains the regular secondary structural elements under these conditions, whereas, after addition of 40% (v/v) H₂O to the MeOH solution, the large ¹H‐chemical‐shift dispersion indicative of a defined spatial peptide fold was lost. The β³‐dodecapeptide is – so far – the longest β‐peptide shown to adopt a regular (M)‐3₁₄‐helix conformation in an organic solvent. The observation that the structure of this long β³‐peptide is not maintained in aqueous solution indicates that the (M)‐3₁₄‐fold is primarily stabilized by short‐range interactions.     

Determination of Enantiomer Purity of β‐ and γ‐Amino Acids by NMR Analysis of Diastereoisomeric Palladium Complexes

Like α‐amino acids, β‐ and γ‐amino acids form spirobicyclic complexes (see 2 and 3 ) by reaction with the chiral di‐μ‐chlorobis{2‐[1‐dimethylamino‐ϰN)‐ethyl]phenyl‐ϰC}dipalladium complexes 1 under basic conditions (Scheme 1 and X‐ray structures in Fig. 1). The diastereoisomeric complexes formed with mixtures of enantiomers of either the amino acids or the dichloro‐dipalladium complexes give rise to marked chemical‐shift differences in the ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectra (Figs. 2 – 4) to allow determination of the enantiomer purities. A simple procedure is described by which β‐ and γ‐amino acids (which may be generated in situ from Boc‐ or Fmoc‐protected precursors) are converted to the Pd complexes and subjected to NMR measurements. The effects of solvent, temperature, and variation of the aryl group in the chiral derivatizing Pd reagent are described (Figs. 4 and 5). The methyl esters of β‐amino acids can also be employed, forming diastereoisomeric chloro[(amino‐ϰN)aryl‐ϰC][(amino‐ϰN)alkanoate]palladium complexes 6 for determining enantiomer ratios (Scheme 6). The new method has great scope, as demonstrated for β²‐, β³‐, β^2,3‐, β^2,2,3‐, γ²‐, γ³‐, γ⁴‐, and γ^2,3,4‐amino acid derivatives.     

Effective Methods for the Synthesis of N‐Methyl β‐Amino Acids from All Twenty Common α‐Amino Acids Using 1,3‐Oxazolidin‐5‐ones and 1,3‐Oxazinan‐6‐ones

N‐Methyl β‐amino acids are generally required for application in the synthesis of potentially bioactive modified peptides and other oligomers. Previous work highlighted the reductive cleavage of 1,3‐oxazolidin‐5‐ones to synthesise N‐methyl α‐amino acids. Starting from α‐amino acids, two approaches were used to prepare the corresponding N‐methyl β‐amino acids. First, α‐amino acids were converted to N‐methyl α‐amino acids by the so‐called ‘1,3‐oxazolidin‐5‐one strategy’, and these were then homologated by the Arndt–Eistert procedure to afford N‐protected N‐methyl β‐amino acids derived from the 20 common α‐amino acids. These compounds were prepared in yields of 23–57% (relative to N‐methyl α‐amino acid). In a second approach, twelve N‐protected α‐amino acids could be directly homologated by the Arndt–Eistert procedure, and the resulting β‐amino acids were converted to the 1,3‐oxazinan‐6‐ones in 30–45% yield. Finally, reductive cleavage afforded the desired N‐methyl β‐amino acids in 41–63% yield. One sterically congested β‐amino acid, 3‐methyl‐3‐aminobutanoic acid, did give a high yield (95%) of the 1,3‐oxazinan‐6‐one ( 65 ), and subsequent reductive cleavage gave the corresponding AIBN‐derived N‐methyl β‐amino acid 61 in 71% yield (Scheme 2). Thus, our protocols allow the ready preparation of all N‐methyl β‐amino acids derived from the 20 proteinogenic α‐amino acids.     

Preparation of (S,S)‐Fmoc‐β2hIle‐OH, (S)‐Fmoc‐β2hMet‐OH,and (S)‐Fmoc‐β2hTyr(tBu)‐OH for Solid‐Phase Syntheses of β2‐ and β2/β3‐Peptides

The preparation of three new N‐Fmoc‐protected (Fmoc=[(9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)methoxy]carbonyl) β²‐homoamino acids with proteinogenic side chains (from Ile, Tyr, and Met) is described, the key step being a diastereoselective amidomethylation of the corresponding Ti‐enolates of 3‐acyl‐4‐isopropyl‐5,5‐diphenyloxazolidin‐2‐ones with CbzNHCH₂OMe/TiCl₄ (Cbz=(benzyloxy)carbonyl) in yields of 60–70% and with diastereoselectivities of >90%. Removal of the chiral auxiliary with LiOH or NaOH gives the N‐Cbz‐protected β‐amino acids, which were subjected to an N‐Cbz/N‐Fmoc (Fmoc=[(9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)methoxy]carbonyl) protective‐group exchange. The method is suitable for large‐scale preparation of Fmoc‐β²hXaa‐OH for solid‐phase syntheses of β‐peptides. The Fmoc‐amino acids and all compounds leading to them have been fully characterized by melting points, optical rotations, IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, and mass spectra, as well as by elemental analyses.     

Hydrolysis Reaction of N-Phosphoryl-α-, β- and γ-amino Acids Studied by HPLC

The hydrolysis reactions of N-（O,O＇diisopropyl）phosphoryl-L-α-alanine （DIPP-L-α-Ala）, N-（O,O＇diisopropyl）- phosphoryl-D-α-alanine （DIPP-D-α-Ala）, N-（O,O＇-diisopropyl）phosphoryl-β-alanine （DIPP-β-Ala） and N-（O,O＇-diisopropyl）phosphoryl-γ-amino butyric acid （DIPP-γ-Aba）, were studied by HPLC and their hydrolysis reaction kinetic equations were obtained. Under acid conditions, the reaction rate of DIPP-L-α-Ala was close to that of DIPP-D-α-Ala and the same rule was true between DIPP-β-Ala and DIPP-γ-Aba. Meantime, the reaction rate of DIPP-L/D-α-Ala was as 10 times as that of DIPP-β-Ala or DIPP-γ-Aba. Under basic conditions, the hydrolysis reactions of DIPP-β-Ala and DIPP-γ-Aba almost did not take place and the reaction rate of DIPP-L/D-α-Ala was about 1/10 of that under acid conditions. Moreover, theoretical calculation further illuminated the differences of the hydrolysis rate from the view of energy. The results would provide some helpful clues to why nature chose a-amino acids but not other kinds of analogs as protein backbones.     

Effect of β3‐Amino Acids on the Performance of the Peptidic Catalyst H‐dPro‐Pro‐Glu‐NH2

The effect of β³‐amino acids on the conformation and catalytic performance of the peptidic catalyst H‐d Pro‐Pro‐Glu‐NH₂ was investigated. Analogues of the peptidic catalyst bearing instead of the α‐amino acids the respective β³‐amino acids were prepared and their reactivity and stereoselectivity was investigated in conjugate addition reactions of aldehydes to nitroolefins. Additional computational studies provided insights into the preferred conformations of the peptidic catalysts. The results show that conformational flexibility at the N‐terminus has a severe effect on the stereoselectivity but is tolerated at the C‐terminus.     

A Chirally Stable,Atropoisomeric, Cα‐Tetrasubstituted α‐Amino Acid: Incorporation into Model Peptides and Conformational Preference

A variety of model peptides, including four complete homologous series, to the pentamer level, characterized by the recently proposed binaphthyl‐based, axially chiral, C^α‐tetrasubstituted, cyclic α‐amino acid Bin, in combination with Ala, Gly, or Aib residues, was synthesized by solution methods and fully characterized. The solution conformational propensity of these peptides was determined by FT‐IR absorption and ¹H‐NMR techniques. Moreover, the molecular structures of the free amino acid (S)‐enantiomer and an N^α‐acylated dipeptide alkylamide with the heterochiral sequence ‐(R)‐Bin‐Phe‐ were assessed in the crystal state by X‐ray diffraction. Taken together, the results point to the conclusion that β‐bends and 3₁₀ helices are preferentially adopted by Bin‐containing peptides, although the fully extended conformation would also be adopted in solution by the short oligomers to some extent. We also confirmed the tendency of (R)‐Bin to fold a peptide chain into right‐handed bend and helical structures. The absolute configuration of the Bin residue(s) was correlated with the typically intense exciton‐split Cotton effect of the ¹B_b binaphthyl transition near 225 nm.     

Preparation of Protected β2‐ and β3‐Homocysteine, β2‐ and β3‐Homohistidine,and β2‐Homoserine for Solid‐Phase Syntheses

The Ser, Cys, and His side chains play decisive roles in the syntheses, structures, and functions of proteins and enzymes. For our structural and biomedical investigations of β‐peptides consisting of amino acids with proteinogenic side chains, we needed to have reliable preparative access to the title compounds. The two β³‐homoamino acid derivatives were obtained by Arndt–Eistert methodology from Boc‐His(Ts)‐OH and Fmoc‐Cys(PMB)‐OH (Schemes 2–4), with the side‐chain functional groups' reactivities requiring special precautions. The β²‐homoamino acids were prepared with the help of the chiral oxazolidinone auxiliary DIOZ by diastereoselective aldol additions of suitable Ti‐enolates to formaldehyde (generated in situ from trioxane) and subsequent functional‐group manipulations. These include OH→O^tBu etherification (for β²hSer; Schemes 5 and 6), OH→STrt replacement (for β²hCys; Scheme 7), and CH₂OH→CH₂N₃→CH₂NH₂ transformations (for β²hHis; Schemes 9–11). Including protection/deprotection/re‐protection reactions, it takes up to ten steps to obtain the enantiomerically pure target compounds from commercial precursors. Unsuccessful approaches, pitfalls, and optimization procedures are also discussed. The final products and the intermediate compounds are fully characterized by retention times (t_R), melting points, optical rotations, HPLC on chiral columns, IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental analyses, and (in some cases) by X‐ray crystal‐structure analysis.     

β‐Turn Analogues in Model αβ‐Hybrid Peptides: Structural Characterization of Peptides Containing β2,2Ac6c and β3,3Ac6c Residues

The effect of gem‐dialkyl substituents on the backbone conformations of β‐amino acid residues in peptides has been investigated by using four model peptides: Boc‐Xxx‐β^2,2Ac₆c(1‐aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 1 ), Phe ( 2 ); Boc=tert‐butyloxycarbonyl) and Boc‐Xxx‐β^3,3Ac₆c(1‐aminocyclohexaneacetic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 3 ), Phe ( 4 )). Tetrasubstituted carbon atoms restrict the ranges of stereochemically allowed conformations about flanking single bonds. The crystal structure of Boc‐Leu‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 1 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn in the αβ‐hybrid sequence. The observed torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈?30°), β(?≈?90°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?90°)) corresponded to a C₁₁ helical turn, which was a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type III β turn in αα sequences. The crystal structure of the peptide Boc‐Phe‐β^3,3Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 4 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn with distinctly different backbone torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈120°), β(?≈60°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?60°)), which corresponded to a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type II β turn observed in αα sequences. In peptide 4 , the two molecules in the asymmetric unit adopted backbone torsion angles of opposite signs. In one of the molecules, the Phe residue adopted an unfavorable backbone conformation, with the energetic penalty being offset by a favorable aromatic interaction between proximal molecules in the crystal. NMR spectroscopy studies provided evidence for the maintenance of folded structures in solution in these αβ‐hybrid sequences.