Photochemical Reaction Mechanisms of 2‐Nitrobenzyl Compounds in Solution,I. 2‐Nitrotoluene: Thermodynamic and Kinetic Parameters of the aci‐Nitro Tautomer

The largely reversible, light‐induced tautomerization of 2‐nitrotoluene ( 1 ) to the quinonoid aci‐nitro tautomer aci‐ 1 was studied by flash photolysis as a benchmark for comparison with the widely used nitrobenzyl phototriggers (`caged compounds'). The pH‐rate profile for the decay of aci‐ 1 in aqueous solution exhibits downward curvature at pH 3 – 4, which is attributed to pre‐equilibrium ionization of the nitronic acid aci‐ 1 to its anion 1 ⁻ (pK_a=3.57). Two regions of upward curvature, at pH ca. 6 and <0 (H₀≈−1), each indicate a change in the reaction mechanism. The elementary reactions that dominate between the curved regions are assigned on the basis of kinetic isotope effects and the observation of general acid catalysis: Hydronium ions regenerate 2‐nitrotoluene by C‐protonation of 1 ⁻ in the pH range of 0 – 6, and H₂O is the proton source at pH>6. A hird, irreversible Nef‐type isomerization of aci‐ 1 prevails in highly acidic solutions (pH<0). The equilibrium constant for the thermal tautomerization of 1 to aci‐ 1 is estimated as pK_T=17.0±0.2 based on kinetic data.     

Crystallographic characterization of the first reported crystalline form of the potent hallucinogen (R)‐2‐amino‐1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propane or `bromodragonfly': the 1:1 anhydrous proton‐transfer compound with 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compound of the potent substituted amphetamine hallucinogen (R)‐2‐amino‐1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propane (common trivial name `bromodragonfly') with 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid, namely 1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propan‐2‐aminium 2‐carboxy‐4,6‐dinitrophenolate, C₁₃H₁₃BrNO₂⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻, forms hydrogen‐bonded cation–anion chain substructures comprising undulating head‐to‐tail anion chains formed through C(8) carboxyl–nitro O—H...O associations and incorporating the aminium groups of the cations. The intrachain cation–anion hydrogen‐bonding associations feature proximal cyclic R₃³(8) interactions involving both an N⁺—H...O_phenolate and the carboxyl–nitro O—H...O associations and aromatic π–π ring interactions [minimum ring centroid separation = 3.566 (2) Å]. A lateral hydrogen‐bonding interaction between the third aminium H atom and a carboxyl O‐atom acceptor links the chain substructures, giving a two‐dimensional sheet structure. This determination represents the first of any form of this compound and is in the (R) absolute configuration. The atypical crystal stability is attributed both to the hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures provided by the anions, which accommodate the aminium proton‐donor groups of the cations and give crosslinking, and to the presence of the cation–anion aromatic ring π–π interactions.     

Asymmetric Reaction of Simple Nitro Compounds with Chiral 1,3‐Oxazolidin‐2‐ones

The chiral oxazolidinone 1 (=[(3aS,6R,7aR)‐tetrahydro‐8,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐4H‐3a,6‐methano‐1,3‐benzoxazol‐3‐yl](oxo)acetaldehyde) was found to react stereoselectively with simple nitro compounds in the presence of Al₂O₃ or Bu₄NF?3 H₂O (TBAF) as catalysts, affording the diastereoisomeric nitro alcohols 3 – 6 with good asymmetric induction. When Al₂O₃ was used, the (S)‐configuration at the center bearing the OH group was generated, with the relative syn‐configuration for the major diastereoisomers. In the case of the nitro‐aldol reaction catalyzed by TBAF, an opposite asymmetric induction was found for two nitro compounds. In contrast to 1 , compound 12 (=((4R,5S)‐4‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐5‐phenyl‐1,3‐oxazolidin‐3‐yl)(oxo)acetaldehyde), a derivative of Evans auxiliary, gave rise to poor asymmetric induction in Henry reactions.     

Hexaaquanickel(II) bis[2‐carboxylato‐2‐(isothiouronium‐S‐ylmethyl)propane‐1,3‐diyl phosphate] hexahydrate

In the title complex, [Ni(H₂O)₆](C₆H₁₀N₂O₆PS)₂·6H₂O, the asymmetric unit consists of one‐half of an Ni atom (which lies on an inversion centre) with three coordinated water molecules, one complete 2‐carboxylato‐2‐(isothiouronium‐S‐ylmethyl)propane‐1,3‐diyl phosphate anion and three noncoordinated water molecules. The hexaaquanickel(II) cations have distorted octahedral coordination and are connected via water chains to form two‐dimensional supramolecular networks parallel to the ab plane. The phosphate ester anion is linked via N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, thus creating various ring, dimer and chain hydrogen‐bonding patterns, and building up a second two‐dimensional supramolecular network parallel to the ab plane. The crystal structure is further stabilized by an intra‐ and interlayer hydrogen‐bond network. This work illustrates that a carboxylate with a caged phosphate ester can open its ring in the presence of dichloridotetrakis(thiourea)nickel, and the resulting polyfunctional anion can be used for constructing a complex hydrogen‐bonding scheme.     

Poly[[diaquabis(μ2‐1‐oxo‐2,6,7‐trioxa‐1‐phosphabicyclo[2.2.2]octane‐4‐carboxylato)copper(II)] dihydrate]

The asymmetric unit of the title complex, {[Cu(C₅H₆O₆P)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O}_n, consists of half a Cu atom, one complete 1‐oxo‐2,6,7‐trioxa‐1‐phosphabicyclo[2.2.2]octane‐4‐carboxylate anion ligand and two non‐equivalent water molecules. The Cu atom lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and has an elongated axially distorted octahedral environment. A two‐dimensional layer structure parallel to (100) is formed as a result of the connectivity brought about by each anion bonding to two different Cu atoms via a carboxylate O atom and a bridging O atom of a C—O—P group. The water molecules participate in extensive O—H...O hydrogen bonding. Neighbouring layers are linked together by intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions. The crystal structure is characterized by intra‐ and interlayer motifs of a hydrogen‐bonded network. This study demonstrates the usefulness of carboxylates with caged phosphate esters in crystal engineering.     

Sodium 5‐nitro‐2‐pyridonate trihydrate

The title compound, alternatively sodium pyridin‐2‐olate trihydrate, Na⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₃^?·3H₂O, crystallizes in the P space group. It is made up of edge‐shared chains of NaO₆ octahedra with five water mol­ecules and one 5‐nitro‐2‐pyridonate anion. Four of these water mol­ecules are bicoordinating, involved in connecting the adjacent octahedra, and the fifth is coordinated to only one octahedron. The crystal structure is stabilized by a network of strong O—H?O and O—H?N interactions. The organic moieties occupy the space between the chains with an antiparallel alignment.     

Temperature Dual Enantioselective Control in a Rhodium‐Catalyzed Michael‐Type Friedel–Crafts Reaction: A Mechanistic Explanation

By changing the temperature from 283 to 233 K, the S (99 % ee) or R (96 % ee) enantiomer of the Friedel–Crafts (FC) adduct of the reaction between N‐methyl‐2‐methylindole and trans‐β‐nitrostyrene can be obtained by using (S_Rh,R_C)‐[(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Rh{(R)‐Prophos}(H₂O)][SbF₆]₂ as the catalyst precursor. This catalytic system presents two other uncommon features: 1) The ee changes with reaction time showing trends that depend on the reaction temperature and 2) an increase in the catalyst loading results in a decrease in the ee of the S enantiomer. Detection and characterization of the intermediate metal–nitroalkene and metal–aci‐nitro complexes, the free aci‐nitro compound, and the FC adduct‐complex, together with solution NMR measurements, theoretical calculations, and kinetic studies have allowed us to propose two plausible alternative catalytic cycles. On the basis of these cycles, all the above‐mentioned observations can be rationalized. In particular, the reversibility of one of the cycles together with the kinetic resolution of the intermediate aci‐nitro complexes account for the high ee values achieved in both antipodes. On the other hand, the results of kinetic measurements explain the unusual effect of the increment in catalyst loading.     

Mononuclear nickel(II) and zinc(II) complexes with deprotonated forms of the tripodal hexadentate ligand 1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methylpropane‐1,3‐diamine

In the crystal structures of both title compounds, [1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐methyl‐2‐(2‐oxidobenzylideneaminomethyl)propane‐1,3‐diamine]nickel(II) [2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methyl‐1,3‐bis(2‐oxidobenzylidene)propane‐1,3‐diamine]nickel(II) chloride methanol disolvate, [Ni(C₂₆H_25.5N₃O₃)]₂Cl·2CH₄O, and [1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐methyl‐2‐(2‐oxidobenzylideneaminomethyl)propane‐1,3‐diamine]zinc(II) perchlorate [2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methyl‐1,3‐bis(2‐oxidobenzylidene)propane‐1,3‐diamine]zinc(II) methanol trisolvate, [Zn(C₂₆H₂₅N₃O₃)]ClO₄·[Zn(C₂₆H₂₆N₃O₃)]·3CH₄O, the 3d metal ion is in an approximately octahedral environment composed of three facially coordinated imine N atoms and three phenol O atoms. The two mononuclear units are linked by three phenol–phenolate O—H...O hydrogen bonds to form a dimeric structure. In the Ni compound, the asymmetric unit consists of one mononuclear unit, one‐half of a chloride anion and a methanol solvent molecule. In the O—H...O hydrogen bonds, two H atoms are located near the centre of O...O and one H atom is disordered over two positions. The Ni^II compound is thus formulated as [Ni(H_1.5L)]₂Cl·2CH₃OH [H₃L is 1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methylpropane‐1,3‐diamine]. In the analogous Zn^II compound, the asymmetric unit consists of two crystallographically independent mononuclear units, one perchlorate anion and three methanol solvent molecules. The mode of hydrogen bonding connecting the two mononuclear units is slightly different, and the formula can be written as [Zn(H₂L)]ClO₄·[Zn(HL)]·3CH₃OH. In both compounds, each mononuclear unit is chiral with either a Δ or a Λ configuration because of the screw coordination arrangement of the achiral tripodal ligand around the 3d metal ion. In the dimeric structure, molecules with Δ–Δ and Λ–Λ pairs co‐exist in the crystal structure to form a racemic crystal. A notable difference is observed between the M—O(phenol) and M—O(phenolate) bond lengths, the former being longer than the latter. In addition, as the ionic radius of the metal ion decreases, the M—O and M—N bond distances decrease.     

Di‐μ‐hydroxo‐bis­[aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)copper(II)] trans‐bis(2‐{[(E)‐5‐formyl‐2‐oxido‐κO‐benzyl­idene]­amino‐κN}ethanesulfonato(2–))copper(II) hexahydrate

The title compound, [Cu₂(OH)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)₂][Cu(C₁₀H₉NO₅S)₂]·6H₂O, is comprised of a copper‐centred complex cation and a copper‐centred complex anion; the cation lies about an inversion centre and in the anion the Cu atom lies on an inversion centre. In the doubly charged bridged dicopper cation, each Cu centre has distorted square‐pyramidal geometry. In the square‐planar dianion, two sulfonate ligands are trans coordinated to the Cu atom via a deprotonated hydroxyl O atom and an imine N atom, forming two six‐membered chelate rings. The structure is stabilized by an extensive hydrogen‐bond system and aromatic‐ring stacking interactions.     

Piperazine‐1,4‐diium–2,4‐dinitrophenolate–water (1/2/2)

In the title 1/2/2 adduct, C₄H₁₂N₂²⁺·2C₆H₃N₂O₅^?·2H₂O, the dication lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and the asymmetric unit also has one anion and one water mol­ecule in general positions. The 2,4‐di­nitro­phenolate anions and the water mol­ecules are linked by two O—H?O and two C—H?O hydrogen bonds to form molecular ribbons, which extend along the b direction. The piperazine dication acts as a donor for bifurcated N—H?O hydrogen bonds with the phenolate O atom and with the O atom of the o‐nitro group. Six symmetry‐related molecular ribbons are linked to a piperazine dication by N—H?O and C—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Properties of Three Copper(II) Complexes Constructed by 4‐(4,6‐Bis(1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazin‐2‐yl)morpholine

Three copper(II) complexes of the polydentate N‐donor ligand [4‐(4,6‐bis(1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazin‐2‐yl)morpholine] (L) with chlorides, nitrates, and perchlorates as anions, namely, [CuCl₂(L)] · 0.5(MeCN) ( 1 ), [Cu(NO₃)₂(H₂O)(L)] · (MeCN) ( 2 ), and [Cu(L)₂](ClO₄)₂ · (MeCN) ( 3 ) were synthesized and structurally characterized by IR, elemental analysis and X‐ray crystallographic analysis. In these complexes, the L ligand binds the copper(II) cation in the tridentate N₃ form. The coordination arrangement around the central copper(II) atom is distorted square‐pyramidal in 1 but it is distorted octahedral in 2 and 3 . The interesting noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonds, π–π stacking, and anion–π interactions present in the solid‐state structures are discussed. The crystal results reveal that the counteranions play important roles in determining the diverse structures of these complexes. Moreover, the PXRD, TG, DRS, and fluorescence properties of compounds 1 – 3 were investigated.     

The N1‐(2′‐deoxyribofuranoside) of 3‐iodo‐5‐nitroindole: a universal nucleoside forming nitro–iodo interactions

The title compound [systematic name: 1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐3‐iodo‐5‐nitro‐1H‐indole], C₁₃H₁₃IN₂O₅, exhibits an anti glycosylic bond conformation with a χ torsion angle of −114.9 (3)°. The furanose moiety shows a twisted C2′‐endo sugar pucker (S‐type), with P = 141.3° and τ_m = 40.3°. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +ap (gauche, trans), with a γ torsion angle of 177.4 (2)°. The extended crystal structure is stabilized by hydrogen bonding and I...O contacts, as well as by stacking interactions. The O atoms of the nitro group act as acceptors, forming bifurcated hydrogen bonds within the ac plane. Additionally, the iodo substituent forms an interplanar contact with an O atom of the nitro group, and another contact with the O atom of the 5′‐hydroxy group of the sugar moiety within the ac plane is observed. These contacts can be considered as the structure‐determining factors for the molecular packing in the crystal structure.     

Di‐μ2‐sulfito‐κ8O,O′:O′,O′′‐bis[(2,4,6‐tri‐2‐pyrid­yl‐1,3,5‐triazine‐κ3N2,N1,N6)cadmium(II)] octa­hydrate

The title compound, [Cd₂(SO₃)₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₆)₂]·8H₂O, is a dimer built up around a symmetry center, where the sulfite anion displays a so far unreported coordination mode in metal‐organic complexes; the anion binds as a μ₂‐sulfite‐κ⁴O,O′:O′,O′′ ligand to two symmetry‐related seven‐coordinate Cd^II cations, binding through its three O atoms by way of two chelate bites with an O atom in common, which acts as a bridge. The cation coordination is completed by a 2,4,6‐tri‐2‐pyridyl‐1,3,5‐triazine ligand acting in its usual tridentate mode.     

Nickel(II)‐Complexes of Aliphatic and Aromatic Nitro Compounds: Preparation and Crystal Structures of [Ni2L(μ1,3‐O2NC6H4O)][ClO4] and [Ni2L(μ1,3‐O2P(OC6H4NO2)2)][BPh4] (L = macrocyclic hexaamine‐dithiophenolate ligand)

The dinuclear Ni^II complex [Ni₂LCl][ClO₄] ( 1 [ClO₄]), where L^2? is a 24‐membered macrocyclic hexaamine‐dithiophenolate ligand, has been examined regarding its ability to coordinate organic nitro compounds (i.e. para‐nitrophenolate, nitromethane, and bis(para‐nitrophenyl)phosphate). Complex 1 [ClO₄] reacts with para‐nitrophenolate in methanol to produce [Ni₂L(μ_1,3‐O₂NC₆H₄O)][ClO₄] ( 2 [ClO₄]), the crystal structure determination of which reveals a bridging para‐nitrophenolate ligand in its aci‐nitro resonance form. The reaction of 1 [ClO₄] with nitromethane in basic solution affords the known nitrite complex [Ni₂L(μ_1,2‐NO₂)][ClO₄] ( 3 [ClO₄]), rather than an aci‐nitromethanid complex [Ni₂L(μ_1,2‐O₂N=CH₂)]⁺ ( 4 ). The reaction of 1 [ClO₄] with bis(para‐nitrophenyl)phosphate yielded [Ni₂L(μ_1,3‐O₂P(OC₆H₄NO₂)₂)]⁺ ( 5 ), which reveals a μ_1,3‐bridging bis(para‐nitrophenyl)phosphate‐ligand.     

1‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐3‐nitro‐1, 2, 4‐triazole and its Complexes with Copper(II) Chloride and Copper(II) Perchlorate

1‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐3‐nitro‐1, 2, 4‐triazole (hnt), prepared by alkylation of 3‐nitro‐1, 2, 4‐triazole with 2‐chloroethanol, was found to react with copper(II) chloride and copper(II) perchlorate in acetonitrile/ethanol solutions giving complexes [Cu₂(hnt)₂Cl₄(H₂O)₂] and[Cu(hnt)₂(H₂O)₃](ClO₄)₂, respectively. They are the first examples of coordination compounds with a neutral N‐substituted 3‐nitro‐1, 2, 4‐triazole ligand. 1‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐3‐nitro‐1, 2, 4‐triazole and the obtained complexes were characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy, X‐ray, and thermal analyses. [Cu₂(hnt)₂Cl₄(H₂O)₂] presents a dinuclear chlorido‐bridged complex in which hnt acts as a chelating bidentate ligand, coordinated to the metal by a nitrogen atom of the triazole ring and an oxygen atom of the nitro group, and the copper atoms are inconsiderably distorted octahedral coordination. [Cu(hnt)₂(H₂O)₃](ClO₄)₂comprises a mononuclear complex cation, in which two nitrogen atoms of two hnt ligands in trans configuration and three water oxygen atoms form a square pyramidal environment around the copper atom, which is completed to an distorted octahedron with a bifurcated vertex due to two additional elongated Cu–O bonds with two nitro groups. In both complexes, Cu–O bonds with the nitro groups may be considered as semi‐coordinated.     

catena‐Poly[hexaaquamagnesium(II) [bis(μ3‐5‐nitro‐2‐oxidoisophthalato)dicopper(II)] dihydrate]

In the centrosymmetric dinuclear anions of the title bimetallic complex, {[Mg(H₂O)₆][Cu₂(C₈H₂NO₇)₂]·2H₂O}_n, each Cu^II ion is strongly coordinated by four O atoms in a distorted square‐planar geometry. Two of these O atoms belong to phenolate groups and the other two to carboxylate groups from 5‐nitro‐2‐oxidoisophthalate (L1) trianions, derived from 5‐nitrobenzene‐1,2,3‐tricarboxylic acid (O₂N–H₃L). The phenolate O atoms bridge the two Cu^II ions in the anion. In addition, each Cu^II cation interacts weakly with a symmetry‐related carboxylate O atom of an adjacent L1 ligand, giving a square‐pyramidal coordination geometry. The copper residue forms a ladder‐like linear coordination polymer via L1 ligands. The [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations sit on centres of inversion. The polymeric anions, cations and free water molecules are self‐assembled into a three‐dimensional supramolecular network via O—H...O hydrogen bonds.     

Poly­[[μ2‐aqua‐bis­[(1,10‐phenanthro­line)nickel(II)]]‐di‐μ2,μ4‐5‐nitro‐1,3‐benzene­di­carboxyl­ato]

The reaction of Ni(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O, 5‐nitro‐1,3‐benzene­di­carboxylic acid (H₂nmbdc), 1,10‐phenanthroline and water under hydro­thermal conditions yields the first reported two‐dimensional nickel coordination polymer with water‐ and carboxyl­ate‐bridged dimeric units, viz. [Ni₂(C₈H₃NO₆)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)]_n. The coordination polyhedron of the Ni^II ion in the title structure is an octahedron defined by an N₂O₄ donor set. The water mol­ecule is positioned on a mirror plane and the 5‐nitro‐1,3‐benzene­di­carboxylate group is located on a twofold axis. Two types of nmbdc²⁻ coordination mode are observed: one is a bis‐monodentate mode, μ₂‐nmbdc²⁻, and the other is a bis‐bridging mode, μ₄‐nmbdc²⁻. The dimeric unit in the title compound is similar to the structural moiety in urease. In the two‐dimensional framework in the title compound, strong stacking interactions between benzene rings (μ₂‐nmbdc²⁻ and μ₄‐nmbdc²⁻) and 1,10‐phenanthroline ligands are observed.     

Aqua­(thio­sulfato‐κ2O,S)[2,4,6‐tri‐2‐pyridyl‐1,3,5‐triazine‐κ3N2,N1,N6]zinc(II) hemihydrate

The title compound, [Zn(S₂O₃)(C₁₈H₁₂N₆)(H₂O)]·0.5H₂O, contains two almost identical independent monomeric moieties composed of an octa­hedral Zn centre coordinated by a tridentate 2,4,6‐tri‐­2‐pyridyl‐1,3,5‐triazine (tpt) ligand, one aqua ligand and an O,S‐chelating thio­sulfate anion. The structure is stabilized by a solvent water mol­ecule. Multiple strong hydrogen bonds with additional weaker π–π inter­actions between tpt groups define a multiple column spatial organization.     

2‐Nitrophenyl 4‐nitrophenyl disulfide

The structure of the title compound, C₁₂H₈N₂O₄S₂, contains no direction‐specific intermolecular interactions, i.e. no C—H?O hydrogen bonds, no aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions and no C—H?π(arene) interactions. This behaviour is compared with the three known symmetrical isomers of bis­(nitro­phenyl) di­sulfide, having the nitro groups on the two 2‐, 3‐ or 4‐positions, all of which exhibit direction‐specific supramolecular aggregation.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Magnetic Characterization of a Series of Iron(II) Coordination Frameworks with 2, 6‐Bis(1, 2,4‐triazole‐4‐yl)pyridine

Based on the bis‐triazole ligand 2, 6‐bis(1, 2,4‐triazole‐4‐yl)pyridine (L), the triazole‐iron(II) complexes [Fe(L)₂(dca)₂(H₂O)₂] · 2H₂O ( 1 ) (Nadca = sodium dicyanamide), {[Fe(μ₂‐L)₂(H₂O)₂]Cl₂}_n ( 2 ), and {[Fe(μ₂‐L)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ · L · H₂O}_n ( 3 ) were isolated by solvent diffusion methods. When iron(II) salts and Nadca were used, compound 1 was isolated, which contains mononuclear Fe(L)₂(dca)₂(H₂O)₂ units. When FeCl₂ or FeClO₄ were used, one‐dimensional (1D) cation iron(II) chains ( 2 ) and two‐dimensional (2D) cation iron(II) networks ( 3 ) were isolated indicating anion directing structural diversity. Moreover, variable‐temperature magnetic susceptibility data of 1 – 3 were recorded in the temperature range 2–300 K. The magnetic curve of complex 2 was fitted by using the classical spin Heisenberg chain model indicating anti‐ferromagnetic interactions (J = –5.31 cm^–1). Obviously complexes 1 – 3 show no detectable thermal spin crossover behaviors, the lack of spin‐crossover behavior may be correlated with FeN₄O₂ coordination spheres in 1 – 3 .