(Phosphine)gold(I) Complexes of Benzenedithioles. Crystal structures of 1,2-benzenedithiolato-bis[triphenyl-phosphinegold(I)] and bis(triethylphosphine)gold(I) bis(1,2-benzenedithiolato)gold(III)

The reaction of 1,2- and 1,3-benzenedithiol C₆H₄(SH)₂ with chloro(phosphine)gold(I) complexes R₃PAuCl (R = Et, Ph) in the presence of triethylamine in tetrahydrofuran gives stable gold(I) complexes 1,2-C₆H₄(SAuPR₃)₂ [R = Et ( 1 ) and Ph ( 2 )] or 1,3-C₆H₄(SAuPPh₃)₂ ( 3 ), respectively, in high yield. The compounds have been characterized by analytical and NMR spectroscopic data. From the reaction of 1,2-C₆H(SH)₂ with Et₃P? AuCl a by-product [(Et₃P)₂Au]⁺ [Au(1,2? C₆H₄S₂)₂]^? ( 4 ) has also been isolated in low yield. The crystal structures of compounds 2 and 4 have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The gold(I) atoms in complex 2 are two-coordinate with bond angles S? Au? P of 175.2(1) and 159.5(1)°, Au? S bond distances of 2.304(1) and 2.321(1) å, and a short Au…?Au contact of 3.145(1) Å. The gold(I) atom in the cation of complex 4 is also linearly two-coordinate with a P? Au? P angle of 170.1(1) Å and Au? P distances of 2.296(3) and 2.298(3) Å. The geometry of the anion in 4 shows a square-planar coordination of gold(III) by two chelating 1,2-benzenedithiolate ligands with Au? S distances between 2.299(3) and 2.312(3) Å (for two crystallographically independent, centrosymmetrical anions in the unit cell).     

Structural and electronic properties of phosphino(oligothiophene) gold(I) complexes

A series of gold(I) complexes containing phosphino(oligothiophene) ligands of varying conjugation length has been prepared. Solid state crystal structures of (PT3)AuCl (PT3 = 5-diphenylphosphino-2,2':5',2' '-terthiophene) and AuCl(PTP)AuCl (PTP = 2,5-diphenylphosphinothiophene) have been obtained. The complex AuCl(PTP)AuCl crystallizes as a dimer with two intermolecular Au-Au contacts. Variable temperature NMR spectroscopy is used to demonstrate the presence of aurophilic interactions in solution for AuI(PTP)AuI. Dual emission is observed for AuCl(PTP)AuCl in solution and is attributed to emission from both monomer and dimer. In the solid state, dimer emission is dominant. The iodo analogue, AuI(PTP)AuI, shows only low energy dimer emission in both solution and the solid state. Compounds in which the ligands contain longer bridges (either bithienyl or terthienyl) show absorption and emission bands due to the pi-pi* transition only, both in solution and the solid state.     

Solid State Structures and Gold-Gold Bonding in Luminescent Halo(dimethylphenylphosphine)gold(I) Complexes

The structures of the series of two-coordinate gold(I) complexes {(Me(2)PhP)AuX}(n) where X is Cl, Br, or I have been examined by X-ray diffraction. The chloro complex crystallized in two separate polymorphic forms. Colorless hexagonal blocks of {(Me(2)PhP)AuCl}(3) crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/m with a = 12.141(4) ?, b = 8.433(2) ?, c = 14.834(3) ?, and beta = 94.15(2) degrees at 130 K with Z = 2. Refinement of 2837 reflections and 177 parameters yielded R = 0.066 and R(w) = 0.069. The complex consists of three nearly linear P-Au-Cl units that are connected by Au-Au contacts at 3.091(2) and 3.120(2) ?. Colorless prisms of {(Me(2)PhP)AuCl}(2) form in the orthorhombic space group P2(1)2(1)2(1) as described earlier (Cookson, P. D.; Tiekink, E. R. T. Acta Crystallogr. 1993, C49, 1602). The two nearly linear P-Au-Cl units are staggered and connected through a Au-Au bond (3.230(2) ?). Colorless rectangular prisms of {(Me(2)PhP)AuBr}(2) form in the monoclinic space group P2(1) with a = 9.572(5) ?, b = 8.757(3), and c = 12.915(7) at 130 K with Z = 2. Refinement of 2469 reflections with 118 parameters yielded R = 0.080 and R(w) = 0.084. {(Me(2)PhP)AuI}(2) is isomorphous with the bromo complex with a = 9.736(2) ?, b = 8.890(2) ?, and c = 13.160(5) ? at 130 K with Z = 2. Refinement of 2796 reflections with 119 parameters yielded R = 0.052 and R(w) = 0.058. These complexes are similar to the chloro dimer but with altered orientations of the phenyl substituent. The predicted order of ligand effects (Cl > Br > I) on Au-Au distances from quasi-relativistic calculations is borne out in the experimental values: 3.230 ? (Cl); 3.119 ? (Br); 3.104 ? (I). In dichloromethane, these complexes dissociate into monomeric units but there is some evidence for the presence of dimers in concentrated solutions of the iodide compound.     

Complexes of gold(I), silver(I), and copper(I) with pentaaryl[60]fullerides

Gold(I), silver(I), and copper(I) phosphine complexes of 6,9,12,15,18-pentaaryl[60]fullerides 1a and 1b, namely, [(4-MeC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Au(PPh(3)) (2a), [(4-t-BuC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Au(PPh(3)) (2b), [(4-MeC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Ag(PCy(3)) (3a), [(4-t-BuC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Ag(PPh(3)) (3b), [(4-t-BuC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Ag(PCy(3)) (3c), [(4-MeC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Cu(PPh(3)) (4a), and [(4-t-BuC(6)H(4))(5)C(60)]Cu(PPh(3)) (4b), have been synthesized and characterized spectroscopically. All complexes except for 3c were also characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Several coordination modes between the cyclopentadienyl ring embedded in the fullerene and the metal centers are observed, ranging from η(1) with a slight distortion toward η(3) in the case of gold(I), to η(2)/η(3) for silver(I), and η(5) for copper(I). Silver complexes 3a and 3b are rare examples of crystallographically characterized Ag(I) cyclopentadienyls whose preparation was possible thanks to the steric shielding provided by fullerides 1a and 1b, which stabilizes these complexes. Silver complexes 3a and 3b both display unexpected coordination of the cyclopentadienyl portion of the fulleride anion with Ag(I). DFT calculations on the model systems (H(5)C(60))M(PH(3)) and CpMPH(3) (M = Au, Ag, or Cu) were carried out to probe the geometries and electronic structures of these metal complexes.     

Highly luminescent gold(I)-silver(I) and gold(I)-copper(I) chalcogenide clusters

The reactions of [AuClL] with Ag(2)O, where L represents the heterofunctional ligands PPh(2)py and PPh(2)CH(2)CH(2)py, give the trigoldoxonium complexes [O(AuL)(3)]BF(4). Treatment of these compounds with thio- or selenourea affords the triply bridging sulfide or selenide derivatives [E(AuL)(3)]BF(4) (E=S, Se). These trinuclear species react with Ag(OTf) or [Cu(NCMe)(4)]PF(6) to give different results, depending on the phosphine and the metal. The reactions of [E(AuPPh(2)py)(3)]BF(4) with silver or copper salts give [E(AuPPh(2)py)(3)M](2+) (E=O, S, Se; M=Ag, Cu) clusters that are highly luminescent. The silver complexes consist of tetrahedral Au(3)Ag clusters further bonded to another unit through aurophilic interactions, whereas in the copper species two coordination isomers with different metallophilic interactions were found. The first is analogous to the silver complexes and in the second, two [S(AuPPh(2)py)(3)](+) units bridge two copper atoms through one pyridine group in each unit. The reactions of [E(AuPPh(2)CH(2)CH(2)py)(3)]BF(4) with silver and copper salts give complexes with [E(AuPPh(2)CH(2)CH(2)py)(3)M](2+) stoichiometry (E=O, S, Se; M=Ag, Cu) with the metal bonded to the three nitrogen atoms in the absence of AuM interactions. The luminescence of these clusters has been studied by varying the chalcogenide, the heterofunctional ligand, and the metal.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Mixed Ligand Complexes of Nickel(II) with 1,1-Dicyanoethylene-2,2-Dithiolate and Some Nitrogen Donors

Mixed ligand complexes of Ni(II) ion with 1,1-dicyanoethylene-2,2-dithiolate (i-MNT ²⁻) as a primary ligand and o -phenylenediamine (OPD), pyridine (py), α-picoline (α-pic), β-picoline (β-pic) or γ-picoline (γ-pic) as secondary ligands have been isolated and characterized on the basis of analytical data, molar conductance, magnetic susceptibility, electronic and infrared spectral studies. The molar conductance data reveal that most of the complexes have 1:1 electrolytic nature in DMF solution. Magnetic and electronic spectral studies suggest square planer and octahedral stereochemistries around Ni(II) ions. Infrared spectral studies suggest bidentate chelating behaviour of i-MNT²⁻ ion and OPD while other ligands show unidentate behaviour in their complexes.     

Molecular design of luminescence ion probes for various cations based on weak gold(I)...gold(I) interactions in dinuclear gold(I) complexes

A series of luminescent dinuclear gold(I) complexes with different crown ether pendants, [Au(2)(PwedgeP)(S-B15C5)(2)] [S-B15C5 = 4'-mercaptobenzo-15-crown-5, P(wedge)P = bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)methane (dcpm) (1), bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) (2)] and [Au(2)(P(wedge)P)(S-B18C6)(2)] [S-B18C6 = 4'-mercaptobenzo-18-crown-6, P(wedge)P = dcpm (3), dppm (4)], and their related crown-free complexes, [Au(2)(P(wedge)P)(SC(6)H(3)(OMe)(2)-3,4)(2)] [P(wedge)P = dcpm (5), dppm (6)], were synthesized. The low-energy emission of the mercaptocrown ether-containing gold(I) complexes are tentatively assigned as originated from states derived from a S --> Au ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) transition. The crown ether-containing gold(I) complexes showed specific binding abilities toward various metal cations according to the ring size of the crown pendants. Spectroscopic evidence was provided for the metal-ion-induced switching on of the gold...gold interactions upon the binding of particular metal ions in a sandwich binding mode.     

Photosensitive azobispyridine gold(I) and silver(I) complexes

The neutral and cationic dinuclear gold(I) compounds [(μ-N-N)(AuR)(2)] (N-N = 2,2'-azobispyridine (2-abpy), 4,4'-azobispyridine (4-abpy); R = C(6)F(5), C(6)F(4)OC(12)H(25)-p, C(6)F(4)OCH(2)C(6)H(4)OC(12)H(25)-p) and [(μ-N-N){Au(PR(3))}(2)](CF(3)SO(3))(2) (N-N = 2-abpy, 4-abpy, R = Ph, Me) have been obtained by displacement of a weakly coordinated ligand by an azobispyridine ligand. The corresponding silver(I) dinuclear [(μ-2-abpy){Ag(CF(3)SO(3))(PPh(3))}(2)] and polynuclear [{Ag(CF(3)SO(3))(4-abpy)}(n)] compounds have been obtained. The molecular structures of [(μ-2-abpy){Au(PPh(3))}(2)](CF(3)SO(3))(2) and [(μ-4-abpy){Au(PMe(3))}(2)](CF(3)SO(3))(2) have been confirmed by X-ray diffraction studies and feature linear gold(I) centers coordinated by pyridyl groups, and non-coordinated azo groups. In contrast the X-ray structure of [(2-abpy){Ag(CF(3)SO(3))(PPh(3))}(2)] shows tetracoordinated silver(I) centers involving chelating N-N coordination by pyridyl and azo nitrogen atoms. The gold(I) compounds with a long alkoxy chain do not behave as liquid crystals, and decompose before their melting point. The soluble gold(I) derivatives are photosensitive in solution and isomerize to the cis azo isomer under UV irradiation, returning photochemically or thermally to the most stable initial trans isomer. The silver(I) derivative [(2-abpy){Ag(CF(3)SO(3))(PPh(3))}(2)] also photoisomerizes in solution under UV irradiation, showing that its solid state structure, which would block isomerization by azo coordination, is easily broken. These processes have been monitored by UV-vis absorption and (1)H NMR spectroscopy. All these compounds are non-emissive in the solid state, even at 77 K.     

Arylgold(I) and aryl(triphenylphosphine)gold(I)compounds

Novel monomeric benzyl- and aryl-gold(I) triphenylphosphine complexes have been prepared. Pure, uncomplexed 2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-phenylgold(I) has been isolated from the reaction of tetranuclear bis {2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl}goldlithium (R₄ Au₂ Li₂) with trimethyltin bromide.     

The first acetimine gold(I) and gold(III) complexes and the first acetonine complexes

Ketimino(phosphino)gold(I) complexes of the type [Au[NR=C(Me)R']L]X (X = ClO4, R = H, L = PPh3, R'=Me (la), Et (2a); L=PAr3 (Ar=C6H4OMe-4), R'=Me (1b), Et (2b); L=PPh3, R=R'=Me (3); X= CF3SO3 (OTf), L=PPh3, R=R'=Me (3'); R=Ar, R'=Me (4)) have been prepared from [Au(acac)L] (acac = acetyl acetonate) and ammonium salts [RNH3]X dissolved in the appropriate ketone MeC(O)R'. Complexes [Au(NH=CMe2)2]X (X = C1O4 (6), OTf (6')) were obtained from solutions of [Au(NH3)2]X in acetone. The reaction of 6 with PPN[AuCl2] or with PhICl2 gave [AuCl(NH=CMe2)] (7) or [AuCI2(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (8), respectively. Complex 7 was oxidized with PhICl2 to give [AuCl3(NH=CMe2)] (9). The reaction of [AuCl(tht)] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene), NaClO4, and ammonia in acetone gave [Au(acetonine)2]ClO4 (10) (acetonine = 2,2,4,4,6-pentamethyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrimidine) which reacted with PPh3 or with PPN[AuCl2] to give [Au(PPh3)(acetonine)]ClO4 (11) or [AuCl(acetonine)] (12), respectively. Complex 11 reacts with [Au(PPh3)(Me2CO)]ClO4 to give [(AuPPh3)2(mu-acetonine)](ClO4)2 (13). The reaction of AgClO4 with acetonine gave [Ag(acetonine)(OClO3)] (14). The crystal structures of [Au(NH2Ar)(PPh3)]OTf (5), 6' and 10 have been determined.     

Synthesis of Platinum(II) Phoshine Isocyanide Complexes and Study of Their Stability in Isomerization and Ligand Disproportionation Reactions

Russian Journal of General Chemistry - Phosphine isocyanide complexes cis-[PtCl2(CNMes)(P)] with mesitylisocyanide and phoshine ligands were synthesized in yields of 92?98%. The products were...     

Binuclear Rhodium(I) Carbonyl Carboxylate Complexes: DFT Study of Structural and Spectral Properties

The geometry of binuclear rhodium(I) complexes, [Rh(μ-Cl)(CO)₂]₂ and [Rh(μ-RCOO)(CO)₂]₂ (R = H, CH₃, CF₃), was optimized by the DFT method; the vibrational spectra and the δ¹³C chemical shifts were calculated. The calculations were performed using the B3LYP hybrid functional and four basis sets. The calculations with the LanL2DZ basis set reflect all trends in the variation of the characteristics predicted using augmented basis sets and observed in the experiment. The Rh → CO electron density transfer along the π-bond and δ¹³C increase, while the bond orders, the intrinsic frequencies, and the force constants of the carbonyl groups in the carboxylate complexes decrease following a decrease in the substituent electronegativity in the series CF₃ > H > CH₃. It was found that the ratio of the ν(CO) intensities in the IR spectra can be used to derive information on the dihedral angle between the Rh(CO)₂ planes in the binuclear complexes. Calculations were carried out for a tetranuclear model system [Rh(HCOO)(CO)₂]₄, which can be treated as an elementary unit of the infinite chains of metal atoms in [Rh(μ-RCOO)(CO)₂]₂ stack crystals. A local minimum was found on the potential energy surface corresponding to the geometric structure of the crystal fragments.     

Synthesis, structural characterization, and theoretical studies of gold(I) and gold(I)-gold(III) thiolate complexes: quenching of gold(I) thiolate luminescence

The gold(I) thiolate complexes [Au(2-SC6H4NH2)(PPh3)] (1), [PPN][Au(2-SC6H4NH2)2] (2) (PPN = PPh3=N=PPh3), and [{Au(2-SC6H4NH2)}2(mu-dppm)] (3) (dppm = PPh2CH2PPh2) have been prepared by reaction of acetylacetonato gold(I) precursors with 2-aminobenzenethiol in the appropriate molar ratio. All products are intensely photoluminescent at 77 K. The molecular structure of the dinuclear derivative 3 displays a gold-gold intramolecular contact of 3.1346(4) A. Further reaction with the organometallic gold(III) complex [Au(C6F5)3(tht)] affords dinuclear or tetranuclear mixed gold(I)-gold(III) derivatives with a thiolate bridge, namely, [(AuPPh3){Au(C6F5)3}(mu2-2-SC6H4NH2)] (4) and [(C6F5)3Au(mu2-2-SC6H4NH2)(AudppmAu)(mu2-2-SC(6)H4NH2)Au(C6F5)3] (5). X-ray diffraction studies of the latter show a shortening of the intramolecular gold(I)-gold(I) contact [2.9353(7) or 2.9332(7) A for a second independent molecule], and short gold(I)-gold(III) distances of 3.2812(7) and 3.3822(7) A [or 3.2923(7) and 3.4052(7) A] are also displayed. Despite the gold-gold interactions, the mixed derivatives are nonemissive compounds. Therefore, the complexes were studied by DFT methods. The HOMOs and LUMOs for gold(I) derivatives 1 and 3 are mainly centered on the thiolate and phosphine (or the second thiolate for complex 2), respectively, with some gold contributions, whereas the LUMO for derivative 4 is more centered on the gold(III) fragment. TD-DFT results show a good agreement with the experimental UV-vis absorption and excitation spectra. The excitations can be assigned as a S --> Au-P charge transfer with some mixture of LLCT for derivative 1, an LLCT mixed with ILCT for derivative 2, and a S --> Au...Au-P charge transfer with LLCT and MC for derivative 3. An LMCT (thiolate --> Au(III) mixed with thiolate --> Au-P) excitation was found for derivative 4. The differing nature of the excited states [participation of the gold(III) fragment and the small contribution of sulfur] is proposed to be responsible for quenching the luminescence.     

Copper(I) Complexes of Bithiazoles

Several new copper(I) complexes of a group of bidentate bithiazole ligands have been isolated. The compounds prepared are bis(2,2′-dimethyl-4,4′-bithiazole)copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(me-b)₂]ClO₄), bis(4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bithiazole)copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(me-i)₂]ClO₄), bis(2,2′-diphenyl-4,4′-bithiazole) copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(ph-b)₂]ClO₄), bis(4,4′-diphenyl-2,2′-bithiazole)copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(ph-i)₂]ClO₄), bis(4,4′,5,5′-tetraphenyl-2,2′-bithiazole)-copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(ph₄-i)₂]ClO₄, bis(2,2′-bithiazole)copper(l) perchlorate ([Cu(i)₂]CIO₄), 2,2′-bithiazolecopper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(i)ClO₄), (2,2′-bithiazole)bis(triphenylphosphinesulfide)copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(i)(SPph₃)₂]ClO₄,(2,2′-bithiazole)bis-( triphenylphosphine)copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(i)(Pph₃)₂]ClO₄), and (4,4′-bithiazole)bis(triphenylphosphine) copper(I) perchlorate ([Cu(b)(Pph₃)₂]ClO₄). Several synthetic techniques were required including one developed in this work which involved the conversion of [Cu(Pph₃)₄]ClO₄ into the thiophosphine complex by reaction with sulfur and subsequent use of this as a labile precursor complex. Optical spectra of the complexes indicate extensive solution dissociation. Several of the complexes ([Cu(ph-b)₂]ClO₄, [Cu(ph-i)₂]CIO₄, and [Cu(i)(Pph₃]ClO₄) were photoluminescent in the solid; one ([Cu(ph-b)₂]ClO₄) showed extensive loss of emission during irradiation. Most of the complexes prepared here appear to bind through the thiazole nitrogen atoms. However, infrared evidence suggests that in two of the complexes thiazole sulfur atoms participate in the bonding.     

Electronic Structures of Copper(I) and Silver(I) beta-Diketonate Complexes

The valence electronic structures of [Cu(hfac)L] (hfac = CF(3)C(O)CHC(O)CF(3); L = PMe(3), CNMe), [Ag(hfac)(PMe(3))], and [Ag(fod)(PEt(3))] (fod = t-BuC(O)CHC(O)C(3)F(7)) have been studied by recording their photoelectron spectra and by performing Xalpha-SW calculations on the model compounds [M(dfm)(PH(3))] (dfm = HC(O)CHC(O)H; M = Cu, Ag) and [Cu(dfm)(CNH)]. For the copper complexes, the spectra were recorded between 21 and 160 eV using He I, He II and synchrotron radiation; while, for the silver complexes, He I and He II, spectra were recorded. Assignments were made by comparison of experimental and calculated values of band energies, and, for the copper complexes, by similar comparison of experimental and theoretical branching ratios as a function of photon energy. For the silver complexes, a more limited comparison of band intensities in the He I and He II spectra was made. In analogous compounds, it is shown that the binding energies follow the sequence Ag 4d > Cu 3d, with an energy difference of almost 2 eV.