Barium,Potassium, and Tris(ethane‐1,2‐diamine)nickel(II) Fluoroalkanedisulfonates and the X‐ray Crystal Structures of K2(O3S)2CHF,K2(O3S)2CF2, K2(O3S)2(CF2)3 · H2O,and [Nien3][(O3S)2(CF2)n] (n = 1, 3)

The barium perfluoroalkanedisulfonates Ba(O₃S)₂(CF₂)_n (n = 1, 3–5) and the new potassium fluoroalkanedisulfonates K₂(O₃S)₂CHF, K₂(O₃S)₂CF₂, and K₂(O₃S)₂(CF₂)₅ have been prepared by reaction of (CF₂)_n(SO₂F)₂ (n = 1, 3–5) or CHF(SO₂F)₂ with CaO (or Ca(OH)₂) and M(OH)_x (M = Ba, x = 2; M = K, x = 1) or with Ba(OH)₂ alone (n = 1) in water. In each of the crystal structures of K₂(O₃S)₂CHF and K₂(O₃S)₂CF₂, there is an eight‐coordinate and a six‐coordinate potassium ion, whilst in K₂(O₃S)₂(CF₂)₃H₂O, two different eight‐coordinate potassium ions are linked by a bridging water molecule. One potassium has additionally six sulfonate oxygen and one fluorine donor atoms, and the other, five sulfonate oxygens and two fluorine donor atoms. The preparation of highly crystalline [Nien₃][(O₃S)(CF₂)_n] (en = ethane‐1,2‐diamine; n = 1, 3–5) and the X‐ray crystal structures for n = 1 or 3 provide evidence for the value of perfluoroalkanedisulfonate ions as counter ions for the crystallization of cationic complexes.     

Solvolysis Products of the Types [RhMeL2(Me3[9]aneN3)]2+ and [RuCl3—XLX(Me3[9]aneN3)](x)+ (x = 1‐2) and Preparation and Structure of [Ru([9]aneS3)(Me3[9]aneN3)](CF3SO3)2

Solvolysis of [RhMe(CF₃SO₃)₂(Me₃[9]aneN₃)] ( 1 ) (Me₃[9]aneN₃ = 1, 4, 7‐trimethyl‐1, 4, 7‐triazacyclononane) in CH₃CN, DMSO or pyrazole (L) leads to substitution of both trifluoromethylsulfonate ligands and formation of the cationic complexes [RhMeL₂(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃)₂ 3—5 . In contrast, treatment of [RuCl₃(Me₃[9]aneN₃)] ( 2 ) with Ag(CF₃SO₃) in a 1:3 ratio for 2h in CH₃CN leads to formation of the tetranuclear complex [{RuCl₃(Me₃[9]aneN₃)}₂Ag₂(CF₃SO₃)(CH₃CN)](CF₃SO₃) · CH₃CN ( 6 ) with a novel [(RuCl₃)₂Ag₂] core. More forcing conditions enable the substitution of respectively one or two chloride ligands by CH₃CN (reflux 18h) or DMF (85°C, 1h) to afford [RuCl₂(CH₃CN)(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃) ( 7 ) and [RuCl(DMF)₂(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃)₂ ( 8 ). The heteroleptic sandwich complex [Ru([9]aneS₃)(Me₃[9]aneN₃)](CF₃SO₃)₂ ( 9 ) can be prepared by reduction of 2 with Zn powder in acetone in the presence of 3 equiv. of Ag(CF₃SO₃), followed by addition of [9]aneS₃ (1, 4, 7‐trithiacyclononane). The redox potential E°(Ru³⁺/Ru²⁺) of +1.87 V vs NHE for 9 is only —0.12 V lower than that of the homoleptic complex [Ru([9]aneS₃)₂]²⁺. Crystal structures are reported for 3 — 9 .     

Octahedral and Cyclic [Ag6] Cluster Cores Stabilized by {Ag3(Spz)3(N‐triphos)3} Motifs [HSpz = Pyrazine‐2‐thiolate,N‐triphos = Tris((diphenylphosphanyl)methyl)amine]: Ag···Ag Interactions

The complexes [Ag₁₂(Spz)₁₂(N‐triphos)₂][Ag₃(Spz)₃(N‐triphos)]₂ · (DMF)₆ ( 1 ) and [Ag₁₈(Spz)₁₂(N‐triphos)₄(CF₃CO₂)₆] ( 2 ) were synthesized and structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction [HSpz = pyrazine‐2‐thiolate, N‐triphos = tris((diphenylphosphanyl)methyl)amine]. The central [Ag₆] ring with chair‐conformation in 1 and the ideally octahedral [Ag₆] cluster core in 2 are both stabilized by the tripodal building units of neutral [Ag₃(Spz)₃(N‐triphos)] compound. The Ag ··· Ag distances of the [Ag₆] moieties in 1 and 2 are 3.07 and 2.81 Å, respectively, exhibiting intermetallic interactions, which can enhance the stability of [Ag₆] conformations. In addition, the π ··· π interactions between parallel pyrazine rings could impose on the building and the Ag ··· Ag interactions of these Ag–S clusters.     

Bis{μ‐3‐[3‐(2‐pyridyl)pyrazol‐1‐ylmethyl]pyridine}disilver(I) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate): effect of counter‐anions on the self‐assembly of coordination complexes

As part of a study on the effect of different counter‐anions on the self‐assembly of coordination complexes, a new dinuclear Ag^I complex, [Ag₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂, with the 3‐[3‐(2‐pyridyl)pyrazol‐1‐ylmethyl]pyridine (L) ligand was obtained through the reaction of L with AgCF₃SO₃. In this complex, each Ag^I center in the centrosymmetric dinuclear complex cation is coordinated by two pyridine and one pyrazole N‐atom donor of two inversion‐related L ligands in a trigonal planar geometry. This forms a unique box‐like cyclic dimer with an intramolecular nonbonding Ag...Ag separation of 6.379 (7) Å. Weak Ag...CF₃SO₃ and C—H...X (X = O and F) hydrogen‐bonding interactions, together with π–π stacking interactions, link the complex cations along the [001] and [10] directions, respectively, generating two different one‐dimensional chains and then an overall two‐dimensional network of the complex running parallel to the (110) plane. Comparison of the structural differences with previous findings suggests that the presence of different counter‐anions plays an important role in the construction of such supramolecular frameworks.     

Synthesen und NMR‐Untersuchungen von Salzen mit den neuen Anionen [PtXn(CF3)6‐n]2— (n = 0 ‐ 5, X = F,OH, Cl,CN) und die Kristallstrukturanalyse von K2[(CF3)2F2Pt(μ‐OH)2PtF2(CF3)2]·2H2O

Syntheses and NMR Spectroscopic Ivestigations of Salts containing the Novel Anions [PtX_n(CF₃)_6‐n]^2— (n = 0 ‐ 5, X = F, OH, Cl, CN) and Crystal Structure of K₂[(CF₃)₂F₂Pt(μ‐OH)₂PtF₂(CF₃)₂]·2H₂O The first syntheses of trifluoromethyl‐complexes of platinum through fluorination of cyanoplatinates are reported. The fluorination of tetracyanoplatinates(II), K₂[Pt(CN)₄], and hexacyanoplatinates(IV), K₂[Pt(CN)₆], with ClF in anhydrous HF leads after working up of the products to K₂[(CF₃)₂F₂Pt(μ‐OH)₂PtF₂(CF₃)₂]·2H₂O. The structure of the salt is determined by a X‐ray structure analysis, P2₁/c (Nr. 14), a = 11.391(2), b = 11.565(2), c = 13.391(3)Å, β = 90.32(3)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0326 (I > 2σ(I)). The reaction of [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CN)₄] with ClF in CH₂Cl₂ generates mainly cis‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtCl₂(CF₃)₄] and fac‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtCl₃(CF₃)₃], but in contrast that of [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CN)₆] with ClF in CH₂Cl₂ results cis‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtX₂(CF₃)₄], [Bu₄N]₂[PtX(CF₃)₅] (X = F, Cl) and [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CF₃)₆]. In the products [Bu₄N]₂[PtX_n(CF₃)_6‐n] (X = F, Cl, n = 0—3) it is possibel to exchange the fluoro‐ligands into chloro‐ and cyano‐ligands by treatment with (CH₃)₃SiCl und (CH₃)₃SiCN at 50 °C. With continuing warming the trifluoromethyl‐ligands are exchanged by chloro‐ and cyano‐ligands, while as intermediates CF₂Cl and CF₂CN ligands are formed. The identity of the new trifluoromethyl‐platinates is proved by ¹⁹⁵Pt‐ and ¹⁹F‐NMR‐spectroscopy.     

The Electron Transfer Series [MoIII(bpy)3]n (n=3+, 2+, 1+, 0, 1−), and the Dinuclear Species [{MoIIICl(Mebpy)2}2(μ2‐O)]Cl2 and [{MoIV(tpy.)2}2(μ2‐MoO4)](PF6)2⋅4 MeCN

The electronic structures of the five members of the electron transfer series [Mo(bpy)₃]ⁿ (n=3+, 2+, 1+, 0, 1?) are determined through a combination of techniques: electro‐ and magnetochemistry, UV/Vis and EPR spectroscopies, and X‐ray crystallography. The mono‐ and dication are prepared and isolated as PF₆ salts for the first time. It is shown that all species contain a central Mo^III ion (4d³). The successive one‐electron reductions/oxidations within the series are all ligand‐based, involving neutral (bpy⁰), the π‐radical anion (bpy^.)^1?, and the diamagnetic dianion (bpy^2?)^2?: [Mo^III(bpy⁰)₃]³⁺ (S=3/2), [Mo^III(bpy^.)(bpy⁰)₂]²⁺ (S=1), [Mo^III(bpy^.)₂(bpy⁰)]¹⁺ (S=1/2), [Mo^III(bpy^.)₃] (S=0), and [Mo^III(bpy^.)₂(bpy^2?)]^1? (S=1/2). The previously described diamagnetic dication “[Mo^II(bpy⁰)₃](BF₄)₂” is proposed to be a diamagnetic dinuclear species [{Mo(bpy)₃}₂(μ₂‐O)](BF₄)₄. Two new polynuclear complexes are prepared and structurally characterized: [{Mo^IIICl(^Mebpy⁰)₂}₂(μ₂‐O)]Cl₂ and [{Mo^IV(tpy^.)₂}₂(μ₂‐Mo^VIO₄)](PF₆)₂?4 MeCN.     

Chiral Fluorinated α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Enantioselective Synthesis and Electrophilic Capture,Racemization Dynamics,and Structure

Enantiomerically pure triflones R¹CH(R²)SO₂CF₃ have been synthesized starting from the corresponding chiral alcohols via thiols and trifluoromethylsulfanes. Key steps of the syntheses of the sulfanes are the photochemical trifluoromethylation of the thiols with CF₃Hal (Hal=halide) or substitution of alkoxyphosphinediamines with CF₃SSCF₃. The deprotonation of RCH(Me)SO₂CF₃ (R=CH₂Ph, iHex) with nBuLi with the formation of salts [RC(Me)? SO₂CF₃]Li and their electrophilic capture both occurred with high enantioselectivities. Displacement of the SO₂CF₃ group of (S)‐MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)SO₂CF₃ (95 % ee) by an ethyl group through the reaction with AlEt₃ gave alkane MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)Et of 96 % ee. Racemization of salts [R¹C(R²)SO₂CF₃]Li follows first‐order kinetics and is mainly an enthalpic process with small negative activation entropy as revealed by polarimetry and dynamic NMR (DNMR) spectroscopy. This is in accordance with a C_α? S bond rotation as the rate‐determining step. Lithium α‐(S)‐trifluoromethyl‐ and α‐(S)‐nonafluorobutylsulfonyl carbanion salts have a much higher racemization barrier than the corresponding α‐(S)‐tert‐butylsulfonyl carbanion salts. Whereas [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂tBu]Li/DMPU (DMPU = dimethylpropylurea) has a half‐life of racemization at ?105 °C of 2.4 h, that of [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li at ?78 °C is 30 d. DNMR spectroscopy of amides (PhCH₂)₂NSO₂CF₃ and (PhCH₂)N(Ph)SO₂CF₃ gave N? S rotational barriers that seem to be distinctly higher than those of nonfluorinated sulfonamides. NMR spectroscopy of [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂R]M (M=Li, K, NBu₄; R=CF₃, tBu) shows for both salts a confinement of the negative charge mainly to the C_α atom and a significant benzylic stabilization that is weaker in the trifluoromethylsulfonyl carbanion. According to crystal structure analyses, the carbanions of salts {[PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li? L }₂ ( L =2 THF, tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA)) and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ have the typical chiral C_α? S conformation of α‐sulfonyl carbanions, planar C_α atoms, and short C_α? S bonds. Ab initio calculations of [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]^? and [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]^? showed for the fluorinated carbanion stronger n_C→σ* and n_O→σ* interactions and a weaker benzylic stabilization. According to natural bond orbital (NBO) calculations of [R¹C(R²)SO₂R]^? (R=tBu, CF₃) the n_C→σ*_{S? R} interaction is much stronger for R=CF₃. Ab initio calculations gave for [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,C_α contact ion pair (CIP) and for [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,O CIP. According to cryoscopy, [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li, [iHexC(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li, and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ predominantly form monomers in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at ?108 °C. The NMR spectroscopic data of salts [R¹(R²)SO₂R³]Li (R³=tBu, CF₃) indicate that the dominating monomeric CIPs are devoid of C_α? Li bonds.     

A Convenient,Selective Synthesis of Bis[2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphane Derivatives Starting from 1,3‐Bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene

The reaction of the sterically shielded phosphane derivative, dichlorodiethylaminophosphane, Cl₂PNEt₂, with an excess of a mixture of 2,6‐bis(trifluoromethyl) and 2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl lithium gives bis[2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]diethylaminophosphane, [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂PNEt₂, in 72 % yield as a colourless solid, while 2,6‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl lithium remains unchanged in solution. The amino derivative crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c (a 869.2(1), b 1857.4(1), c 1357.6(1) pm, β 100.57(4)°, Z = 4). Treatment of [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂PNEt₂ in CHCl₃ solution with conc. HCl allows the synthesis of [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃)]₂PCl. [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂PCl reacts with H₂O in THF solution with quantitative formation of the corresponding secondary phosphane oxide. To obtain bis[2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphinic acid, [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂P(O)OH, quantitatively, a CHCl₃ solution of [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂P(O)H, has to be stirred in an NO₂ atmosphere. The phosphinic acid crystallizes is the triclinic space group (a 754.2(1), b 927.6(2), c 1305.5(2) pm, α 85.11(2)°, β 75.45(1)°, γ 79.99(2)°, Z = 2). From the reaction of the phosphinic acid with either elemental sodium or with cyanide salts, the corresponding phosphinate salts are obtained in an almost quantitatively yield.     

Synthesen und Charakterisierungen der ersten Tris‐ und Tetrakis(trifluormethyl)palladate(II) und ‐platinate(II), [M(CF3)3(PPh3)]— und [M(CF3)4]2— (M = Pd,Pt)

Syntheses and Characterizations of the First Tris and Tetrakis(trifluoromethyl) Palladates(II) and Platinates(II), [M(CF₃)₃(PPh₃)]^— and [M(CF₃)₄]^2— (M = Pd, Pt) Tris(trifluoromethyl)(triphenylphosphino)palladate(II) and platinate(II), [M(CF₃)₃PPh₃]^—, and the tetrakis(trifluoromethyl)metallates, [M(CF₃)₄]^2— (M = Pd, Pt), are prepared from the reactions of [MCl₂(PPh₃)₂] and Me₃SiCF₃ / [Me₄N]F or [I(CF₃)₂]^— salts in good yields. [Me₄N][M(CF₃)₃(PPh₃)] crystallize isotypically in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (no. 62) with Z = 4. The NMR spectra of the new compounds are described.     

Silver–Ethene Complexes [Ag(η2‐C2H4)n][Al(ORF)4] with n=1, 2, 3 (RF=Fluorine‐Substituted Group)

Compounds including the free or coordinated gas‐phase cations [Ag(η²‐C₂H₄)_n]⁺ (n=1–3) were stabilized with very weakly coordinating anions [A]^? (A=Al{OC(CH₃)(CF₃)₂}₄, n=1 ( 1 ); Al{OC(H)(CF₃)₂}₄, n=2 ( 3 ); Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄, n=3 ( 5 ); {(F₃C)₃CO}₃Al‐F‐Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₃, n=3 ( 6 )). They were prepared by reaction of the respective silver(I) salts with stoichiometric amounts of ethene in CH₂Cl₂ solution. As a reference we also prepared the isobutene complex [(Me₂C?CH₂)Ag(Al{OC(CH₃)(CF₃)₂}₄)] ( 2 ). The compounds were characterized by multinuclear solution‐NMR, solid‐state MAS‐NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy as well as by their single crystal X‐ray structures. MAS‐NMR spectroscopy shows that the [Ag(η²‐C₂H₄)₃]⁺ cation in its [Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]^? salt exhibits time‐averaged D_3h‐symmetry and freely rotates around its principal z‐axis in the solid state. All routine X‐ray structures (2θ_max.<55°) converged within the 3σ limit at C?C double bond lengths that were shorter or similar to that of free ethene. In contrast, the respective Raman active C?C stretching modes indicated red‐shifts of 38 to 45 cm^?1, suggesting a slight C?C bond elongation. This mismatch is owed to residual librational motion at 100 K, the temperature of the data collection, as well as the lack of high angular data owing to the anisotropic electron distribution in the ethene molecule. Therefore, a method for the extraction of the C?C distance in [M(C₂H₄)] complexes from experimental Raman data was developed and meaningful C?C distances were obtained. These spectroscopic C?C distances compare well to newly collected X‐ray data obtained at high resolution (2θ_max.=100°) and low temperature (100 K). To complement the experimental data as well as to obtain further insight into bond formation, the complexes with up to three ligands were studied theoretically. The calculations were performed with DFT (BP86/TZVPP, PBE0/TZVPP), MP2/TZVPP and partly CCSD(T)/AUG‐cc‐pVTZ methods. In most cases several isomers were considered. Additionally, [M(C₂H₄)₃] (M=Cu⁺, Ag⁺, Au⁺, Ni⁰, Pd⁰, Pt⁰, Na⁺) were investigated with AIM theory to substantiate the preference for a planar conformation and to estimate the importance of σ donation and π back donation. Comparing the group 10 and 11 analogues, we find that the lack of π back bonding in the group 11 cations is almost compensated by increased σ donation.     

[6,6]‐Open and [6,6]‐Closed Isomers of C70(CF2): Synthesis,Electrochemical and Quantum Chemical Investigation

Novel difluoromethylenated [70]fullerene derivatives, C₇₀(CF₂)_n (n=1–3), were obtained by the reaction of C₇₀ with sodium difluorochloroacetate. Two major products, isomeric C₇₀(CF₂) mono‐adducts with [6,6]‐open and [6,6]‐closed configurations, were isolated and their homofullerene and methanofullerene structures were reliably determined by a variety of methods that included X‐ray analysis and high‐level spectroscopic techniques. The [6,6]‐open isomer of C₇₀(CF₂) constitutes the first homofullerene example of a non‐hetero [70]fullerene derivative in which functionalisation involves the most reactive bond in the polar region of the cage. Voltammetric estimation of the electron affinity of the C₇₀(CF₂) isomers showed that it is substantially higher for the [6,6]‐open isomer (the 70‐electron π‐conjugated system is retained) than the [6,6]‐closed form, the latter being similar to the electron affinity of pristine C₇₀. In situ ESR spectroelectrochemical investigation of the C₇₀(CF₂) radical anions and DFT calculations of the hyperfine coupling constants provide evidence for the first example of an inter‐conversion between the [6,6]‐closed and [6,6]‐open forms of a cage‐modified fullerene driven by an electrochemical one‐electron transfer. Thus, [6,6]‐closed C₇₀(CF₂) constitutes an interesting example of a redox‐switchable fullerene derivative.     

Perfluormethyl-Element-Liganden. XVIII. Darstellung und spektroskopische Untersuchung von M(CO)5L und M(CO)4L2-Komplexen [L = MenP(CF3)3−n; n = 0–3; M = Cr,Mo, W]

Perfluoromethyl-Element-Ligands. XVIII. Preparation and Spectroscopic Investigation of M(CO)₅L and M(CO)₄L₂ Complexes [L = Me_nP(CF₃)_3?n; n = 0–3; M = Cr, Mo, W] M(CO)₅L and cis-M(CO)₄L₂ complexes, respectively [M = Cr, Mo, W; L = Me_nP(CF₃)_3?n; n = 0–3] are prepared reacting M(CO)₅ · THF or M(CO)₄norbor with L at room temperature. The cis-compounds isomerize above 50°C yielding the trans-complexes; the rate of isomerization increases with increasing number of CF₃ groups. Thermal reaction of M(CO)₆ (M = Cr, Mo, W) with P(CF₃)₃ yields M(CO)₅P(CF₃)₃ and trans-M(CO)₄[P(CF₃)₃]₂. Introduction of three P(CF₃)₃ ligands by reaction with M(CO)₃(cycloheptatriene) (M = Cr, Mo) proves unsuccessful; besides little M(CO)₅P(CF₃)₃ trans-M(CO)₄[P(CF₃)₃]₂ is formed. The new compounds are characterized by analytical and spectroscopic (n.m.r., i.r., MS) methods.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Characterization of Two Novel Five‐coordinate Zinc(II) Complexes with the Tripod Ligand Tris(N‐methylbenzimidazol‐2‐yl‐methyl)amine and α,β‐unsaturated Carboxylates

Two novel five‐coordinate zinc(II) complexes with the tripod ligand tris(N‐methylbenzimidazol‐2‐ylmethyl)amine (Mentb) and two different α,β‐unsaturated carboxylates, with the composition [Zn(Mentb)(acrylate)] (ClO₄)·DMF·1.5CH₃OH ( 1 ) and [Zn(Mentb)(cinnamate)](ClO₄)·2DMF·0.5CH₃OH ( 2 ), were synthesized and characterized by means of elemental analyses, electrical conductivity measurements, IR, UV, and ¹H NMR spectra. The crystal structure of two complexes have been determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction method, and show that the Zn^II atom is bonded to a Mentb ligand and a α,β‐unsaturated carboxylate molecule through four N atoms and one O atom, resulting in a distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal coordination [τ( 1 ) = 0.853, τ( 2 ) = 0.855], with approximate C₃ symmetry.     

Bis­(aceto­nitrile‐κN)[(1RS,4RS,8SR,11SR)‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­tetra­decane‐κ4N]copper(II) bis{tetrakis­[3,5‐bis­(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­borate} 0.31‐hydrate

The title compound, [Cu(C₂H₃N)₂(C₁₀H₂₄N₄)](C₃₂H₁₂BF₂₄)₂·0.31H₂O, crystallizes as an ionic species with no interactions between the ions. The [Cu^II(cyclam)(MeCN)₂]²⁺ dication (cyclam is 1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­tetra­decane), located on a 2/m symmetry site, forms as a distorted octahedral species with four Cu—N_cyclam bonds of 2.013 (2) Å and two C—N_MeCN bonds of 2.499 (4) Å. The [B{C₆H₃(CF₃)‐3,5}₄]⁻ anion, located on a twofold axis, is a distorted octahedral species. A small amount of water is present, occupying sites between columns of ions.     

Preparation,Spectroscopic Properties,and Crystal Structures of Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)(μ‐CF2)2, Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)2(μ‐CF2), and Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CF2)(PPh3)2 – Theoretical Studies of Methylenic vs. Carbonyl Bridges in Diiron Complexes

The reaction of Na₂[Fe(CO)₄] with Br₂CF₂ in n‐pentane generates a mixture of the compounds (CO)₃Fe(μ‐CO)_3–n(μ‐CF₂)_nFe(CO)₃ ( 2 , n = 2; 3 , n = 1) in low yields with 3 as the main product. 3 is obtained free from 2 by reacting Br₂CF₂ with Na₂[Fe₂(CO)₈]. The non‐isolable monomeric complex (CO)₄Fe=CF₂ ( 1 ) can probably considered as the precursor for 2 . 3 reacts with PPh₃ with replacement of two CO ligands to form Fe₂(CO)₆(μ‐CF₂)(PPh₃)₂ ( 4 ). The complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. While the structure of 2 is strictly similar to that of Fe₂(CO)₉, the structure of 3 can better be described as a resulting from superposition of the two enantiomers 3 a and 3 b with two semibridging CO groups. Quantum chemical DFT calculations for the series (CO)₃Fe(μCO)_3–n(μ‐CF₂)_nFe(CO)₃ (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) as well as for the corresponding (μ‐CH₂) derivatives indicate that the progressively larger σ donor and π acceptor properties for the bridging ligands, in the order CO < CF₂ < CH₂, favor a stronger Fe–Fe bond.     

2,11-二硫代[3.3]二聚对二甲苯与线性氟代二羧酸银之配位聚合物的合成

本文主要描述了由配体2,11-二硫代[3.3]二聚对二甲苯与线性氟代二羧酸银反应制得的三个银配合物的结构。这些配合物的结构因氟代二羧酸银的不同,差别也很大。配体2,11-二硫代[3.3]二聚对二甲苯与氟代丁二酸银反应得到的配合物1是一维链状结构;将银盐换成氟代戊二酸银则获得了三维立体结构的配合物2;若使用氟代己二酸银,则得到了二维多孔的配合物3。在多孔配合物3中,每个孔中容纳了两个客体三甲苯分子,在150℃时这些客体分子可被完全脱除。     

Two 2,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazo­le–metal complexes (M = Cu and Ni)

The reaction of the diazine ligand 3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazole (pod, C₁₂H₈N₄O), with Cu(CF₃SO₃)₂ or Ni(ClO₄)₂ afforded the title complexes di­aqua­bis­[3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazole‐N²,N³]copper(II) bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sul­fon­ate), [Cu(pod)₂(H₂O)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂, and di­aqua­bis­[3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazo­le‐N²,N³]­nickel(II) diperchlorate, [Ni(pod)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂. Both complexes present a crystallographically centrosymmetric mononuclear cation structure which consists of a six‐coordinated Cu^II or Ni^II ion with two pod mol­ecules acting as bidentate ligands and two axially coordinated water mol­ecules.     

Similarities and differences between bis[2‐(bromomethyl)phenyl] diselenide,bis[2‐(chloromethyl)phenyl] diselenide and bis[2‐(hydroxymethyl)phenyl] diselenide

The title compounds, C₁₄H₁₂Br₂Se₂, (I), C₁₄H₁₂Cl₂Se₂, (II), and C₁₄H₁₄O₂Se₂, (III), feature a diselenide bridge between two o‐benzyl bromide [in (I)], two o‐benzyl chloride [in (II)] or two o‐benzyl alcohol units [in (III)]. In the molecular structure of (I) and in both independent molecules of (II), close contacts are observed between the halogen centres and the diselenide unit. In the case of modification (IIIa), strong hydrogen bonds between the –OH groups dominate, whereas the molecular structures of modification (IIIb) and bis{2‐[(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl} diselenide, C₁₈H₂₄N₂Se₂, (IV), are comparable with those of (I) and (II). A correlation between the strength of the contacts and the angle between the benzene planes and the Se—Se units is found.     

New Rh(III) complexes of 5‐methyl‐5‐(pyridyl)‐2,4‐imidazolidenedione: Synthesis,X‐ray structure,electrochemical study and catalytic behaviour for hydrogenation of ketones

We describe the reaction of anion [RhCl₆]³⁻ with a series of hydantoin ligands (HL1, HL2 and HL3 = 5‐methyl‐5‐(2‐, 3‐ and 4‐pyridyl)‐2,4‐imidazolidenedione, respectively). Based on spectroscopic, cyclic voltammetric, elemental and MS analyses, the complexes have the general formula K[RhCl₂(L1)₂] ( 1 ), cis ‐ and trans ‐K[RhCl₄(HL2)₂] ( 2a and 2b ) and cis ‐ and trans ‐K[RhCl₄(HL3)₂] ( 3a and 3b ). Complexes 2a , 2b , 3a and 3b were characterized successfully using infrared, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectral analyses. Dissolution of complex 1 in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) led to elimination of one KL1 ligand and coordination of two DMSO molecules as ligands and transformation of this complex to cis ‐ and trans ‐[RhCl₂L1(DMSO)₂] ( 1a and 1b ). Recrystallization led to separation and isolation of crystals of 1a from the initial mixture. X‐ray analysis results showed that this complex was crystallized as solvated complex cis ‐[RhCl₂L1(DMSO)₂]DMSO. The catalytic activity of these complexes was then evaluated for the hydrogenation of various ketones.     

Electrochemical and Theoretical Investigations of the Role of the Appended Base on the Reduction of Protons by [Fe2(CO)4(κ2‐PNPR)(μ‐S(CH2)3S] (PNPR={Ph2PCH2}2NR,R=Me,Ph)

The behavior of [Fe₂(CO)₄(κ²‐PNP^R)(μ‐pdt)] (PNP^R=(Ph₂PCH₂)₂NR, R=Me ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 ); pdt=S(CH₂)₃S) in the presence of acids is investigated experimentally and theoretically (using density functional theory) in order to determine the mechanisms of the proton reduction steps supported by these complexes, and to assess the role of the PNP^R appended base in these processes for different redox states of the metal centers. The nature of the R substituent of the nitrogen base does not substantially affect the course of the protonation of the neutral complex by CF₃SO₃H or CH₃SO₃H; the cation with a bridging hydride ligand, 1 μH⁺ (R=Me) or 2 μH⁺ (R=Ph) is obtained rapidly. Only 1 μH⁺ can be protonated at the nitrogen atom of the PNP chelate by HBF₄?Et₂O or CF₃SO₃H, which results in a positive shift of the proton reduction by approximately 0.15 V. The theoretical study demonstrates that in this process, dihydrogen can be released from a η²‐H₂ species in the Fe^IFe^II state. When R=Ph, the bridging hydride cation 2 μH⁺ cannot be protonated at the amine function by HBF₄?Et₂O or CF₃SO₃H, and protonation at the N atom of the one‐electron reduced analogue is also less favored than that of a S atom of the partially de‐coordinated dithiolate bridge. In this situation, proton reduction occurs at the potential of the bridging hydride cation, 2 μH⁺ . The rate constants of the overall proton reduction processes are small for both complexes 1 and 2 (k_obs≈4–7 s^?1) because of the slow intramolecular proton migration and H₂ release steps identified by the theoretical study.