Knowing students as mathematics learners and teaching numbers 10–100: A case study of four 1st grade teachers from Romania

Researchers have increasingly linked teacher effectiveness with teacher knowledge of subject matter, curriculum, and teaching. Moreover, teacher knowledge of students has been regarded as another very significant component of teacher knowledge, influencing the classroom practice and student performance. Knowing students as mathematics learners means being aware of the ways students learn certain topics. This study examined the knowledge of students as mathematics learners displayed by four 1st grade teachers from Romania when designing and implementing a lesson on numbers 10–100. Findings show that knowledge of students as mathematics learners influenced the ways teachers planned and implemented their lesson. Teachers learned about students as mathematics learners from one series to another, and they tailored their use of manipulatives and classroom activities to meet the needs of their current students.     

Knowledge shifts in a probability classroom: a case study coordinating two methodologies

Knowledge shifts are essential in the learning process in the mathematics classroom. Our goal in this study is to better understand the mechanisms of such knowledge shifts, and the roles of the individuals (students and teacher) in realizing them. To achieve this goal, we combined two approaches/methodologies that are usually carried out separately: the Abstraction in Context approach with the RBC+C model commonly used for the analysis of processes of constructing knowledge by individuals and small groups of students; and the Documenting Collective Activity approach with its methodology commonly used for establishing normative ways of reasoning in classrooms. This combination revealed that some students functioned as “knowledge agents,” meaning that they were active in shifts of knowledge among individuals in a small group, or from one group to another, or from their group to the whole class or within the whole class. The analysis also showed that the teacher adopted the role of an orchestrator of the learning process and assumed responsibility for providing a learning environment that affords argumentation and interaction. This enables normative ways of reasoning to be established and enables students to be active and become knowledge agents.     

Teachers' ways of listening and responding to students' emerging mathematical models

In this paper, I present the results of a case study of the practices of four experienced secondary teachers as they engaged their students in the initial development of mathematical models for exponential growth. The study focuses on two related aspects of their practices: (a) when, how and to what extent they saw and interpreted students' ways of thinking about exponential functions and (b) how they responded to the students' thinking in their classroom practice. Through an analysis of the teachers' actions in the classroom, I describe the teachers' developing knowledge when using modeling tasks with secondary students. The analysis suggests that there is considerable variation in the approaches that teachers take in listening to and responding to students' emerging mathematical models. Having a well-developed schema for how students might approach the task enabled one teacher to press students to express, evaluate, and revise their emerging models of exponential growth. Implications for the knowledge needed to teach mathematics through modeling are discussed.     

Students discussing mathematics in small-group interactions: opportunities for discursive negotiation processes focused on contentious mathematical issues

Small-group discussions involving students and their teacher that focus on meanings constructed during the mathematics lessons or solutions to problems produced in these lessons offer great potential for debate and argument. An analysis of the epistemological nature of knowledge can give deeper insight, to gain a better understanding of the emerging discontinuities in argumentations, negotiations, and clarifications about contentious meaning differences that arise. In most cases mathematical interactions between students and a teacher about contentions are very fragile and seem to be handled more or less directly—by side-stepping to another topic or by resolving via the teacher’s authority, for example. Therefore, the maintenance of such negotiation processes in mathematics teaching is a specific challenge for students and the teacher. The type of closure of these processes seems to be related to the emerging maintenance processes. In this paper, small-group discussions are interpretatively analyzed in the three steps “Initiation—Maintenance—Closing” with the focus on fundamental (dialogical) learning.     

Teaching-Learning of Evaluative Criteria for Mathematical Arguments Through Classroom Discourse: A Cross-National Study

Videotaped lessons of 5th graders on equivalent fractions from 7 American and 6 Japanese classrooms were analyzed in terms of a recurrent pattern in public discourse among a teacher and students. This pattern—called inquiry, response, feedback—occurs when a teacher initiates discourse (mostly with an inquiry), a student or students respond (often with an answer to the teacher inquiry), and the teacher provides feedback to the student's response. We found2 approaches to the teaching-learning of the criteria for evaluating mathematical arguments. In the Japanese classroom, students were encouraged to offer their own argument to the whole class and evaluate arguments proposed by other students. They seldom were given direct evaluation by their teacher. In contrast, American teachers often gave individual elaboration as well as direct evaluation to the student's responses, and some of the teachers offered their own opinions about mathematics, about valid ways of argumentation, or about both. The Japanese approach would help students acquire evaluative criteria indirectly through participating in mathematical discourse, whereas the American approach would help students learn modes of arguments through direct instruction.     

Changed views on mathematical knowledge in the course of didactical theory development—independent corpus of scientific knowledge or result of social constructions?

The study tries to show one line of how the German didactical tradition has evolved in response to new theoretical ideas and new—empirical—research approaches in mathematics education. First, the classical mathematical didactics, notably ‘stoffdidaktik’ as one (besides other) specific German tradition are described. The critiques raised against ‘stoffdidaktik’ concepts [for example, forms of ‘progressive mathematisation’, ‘actively discovering learning processes’ and ‘guided reinvention’ (cf. Freudenthal, Wittmann)] changed the basic views on the roles that ‘mathematical knowledge’, ‘teacher’ and ‘student’ have to play in teaching–learning processes; this conceptual change was supported by empirical studies on the professional knowledge and activities of mathematics teachers [for example, empirical studies of teacher thinking (cf. Bromme)] and of students’ conceptions and misconceptions (for example, psychological research on students’ mathematical thinking). With the interpretative empirical research on everyday mathematical teaching–learning situations (for example, the work of the research group around Bauersfeld) a new research paradigm for mathematics education was constituted: the cultural system of mathematical interaction (for instance, in the classroom) between teacher and students.     

Progressive, classical or balanced— A look at mathematical learning environments in Swiss-German lower-secondary schools

In a national supplement to TIMSS, lower-secondary school teachers (N=102) and their students (N=975) reported on mathematics instruction by means of a teacher questionnaire (teaching-learning methods, instructional sub-goals, facilitated student activities, achievement assessment, teacher role) and a student questionnaire (teachers' instructional proficiency, classroom climate). A cluster analysis performed on the ratings of teaching-learning methods yielded a solution with three clusters referred to as progressive, classical, and balanced learning environment. Cluster-related differences in facilitated student activities, achievement evaluation and preferred teacher role were found but not in instructional sub-goals. Students from different learning environments equally approved teachers' instructional proficiency and classroom climate and also had similar TIMSS mathematics scores. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that in addition to classical teacher-centered learning environments there seem to exist more diversified and studentcentered learning environments that address the needs for students to direct their own learning, communicate and work with others, and develop ways of dealing with complex problems. In line with the research literature it was also found that high mathematics achievement is not restricted to a certain type of learning environment.     

The Distance Education Debate: An Australian View

This essay tells the story of one person's transformation from ineffective to effective teacher. While ostensibly a narrative of personal revelation and growth, the author reveals that re-envisioning who he is as a teacher required critical reflection on the social forces that shape people. He shows the link between his early discomforts and failures in the classroom and the basic messages about education and self-worth conveyed in the community that raised him. And he introduces us to remarkable students who taught him the real-world and classroom implications of abstractions like race and class. These experiences culminated in better teaching but, more importantly, in the recognition that we cannot know and reach our students unless we are willing to interrogate and transform the lens—the social self—that we bring to the classroom.     

Capitalizing on Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Classroom Blogging

The challenge many teachers face is how to incorporate new technology into their classrooms that strengthens classroom learning by capitalizing on students’ media literacies. Blogs, a new and innovative technological tool, can be used in math and science classrooms to support student learning by capitalizing on students’ interests and familiarity with on‐line communication. This study explores the emerging blogging practices of one high school mathematics teacher and his class to explore issues of intent, use, and perceived value. Data sources for this case included one year's worth of blog content, an interview with the facilitating teacher, and students ‘perceptions of classroom blogging practices. Findings indicate that (1) teachers’ intentions focused on creating additional forms of participation as well as increasing student exposure time with content; (2) blogs were used in a wide variety of ways that likely afforded particular benefits; and (3) both teacher and students perceived the greater investment to be worthwhile. The findings are used to critically consider claims made in the literature about the potential of blogging to effectively support classroom learning.     

Building coherence in research on mathematics teacher characteristics by developing practice-based approaches

Scholars have debated which teacher characteristics are primary in determining teachers’ practice. Some claim that identity is at the core of teachers’ ways of being and acting; others argue that teachers’ actions depend principally on their knowledge or beliefs. We argue that, whichever is examined, it is important to study how teachers use specific characteristics in their work, and how the work of teaching is shaped by that use. We claim that this can be done by addressing research questions about teacher characteristics in ways that provide insight into how they contribute to shaping interactions in classrooms—what we call a practice-based approach. To develop and illustrate our argument, we discuss studies that exemplify what we mean by a practice-based approach to the study of a teacher characteristic and we unpack ways in which these studies distinctively contribute to understanding and improving practice. Further, we explore ways in which the development of practice-based approaches might support coherence across efforts to study different characteristics and innovation in studies that consider the interplay of different teacher characteristics in teaching.     

An ecological reading of mathematical language in a Grade 3 classroom: A case of learning and teaching measurement estimation

In our work in teacher education and professional development, we aim to help teachers to learn to participate in, and create, classroom ecologies that support students’ learning. In this article we focus on the challenges of developing a classroom ecology that provides mathematical sustenance for students. We pay particular attention to the ways in which classroom language can impede the development of a classroom ecology—one where all students are heard and where knowing is understood as participatory. We present recommendations for teaching practice drawn from an ecological reading of the classroom discourse during a series of lessons on measurement in a Grade 3 classroom.     

Instructional identities of geometry students

We inspect the hypothesis that geometry students may be oriented toward how they expect that the teacher will evaluate them as students or otherwise oriented to how they expect that their work will give them opportunities to do mathematics. The results reported here are based on a mixed-methods analysis of twenty-two interviews with high school geometry students. In these interviews students respond to three different tasks that presented students with an opportunity to do a proof. Students’ responses are coded according to a scheme based on the hypothesis above. Interviews are also coded using a quantitative linguistic ratio that gauges how prominent the teacher was in the students’ opinions about the viability of these proof tasks. These scores were used in a cluster analysis that yielded three student profiles that we characterize using composite profiles. These profiles highlight the different ways that students can experience proof in the geometry classroom.     

The Detailed Analysis of an Established Teacher's Non-Traditional Lesson

This article presents the fine-grained analysis of an experienced teacher conducting a highly interactive, non-standard lesson of his own design. The analysis, often carried out on a line-by-line level, seeks to explain how and why the teacher made the decisions he did while interacting with his students. The analysis indicates that much of the lesson, in which the teacher is truly responsive to the ideas generated by the students, can be modeled closely using a small number of contingency-based teaching strategies. Even in a case where a student makes a rather unusual comment, the model—which includes the detailed characterization of the teacher's knowledge, goals, and beliefs—is capable of predicting with some precision the nature of the teacher's response.     

A model for developing students’ example space: the key role of the teacher

Our research addresses the role of examples to foster the students’ development of the mathematical concepts, and of their mathematical ways of thinking. We consider the notion of example space introduced by Watson and Mason (Mathematics as a constructive activity: learners generating examples, 2005), particularly when it is not formed by a simple juxtaposition of examples, rather it is endowed by a certain structure. Such a structure is provided by the semiotic actions and by the theoretic and logical dimensions of the mathematical activities. However, the formation of structured example spaces is far from being an automatic process. In this paper, we focus on the genesis of examples and on the role of the teacher in helping the students to structure their examples spaces through the so-called cognitive apprenticeship method. We point out that the genesis of examples is often accomplished within a complex cyclic dynamics, the “cycle of examples production and modification”. We illustrate it by means of two emblematic episodes from a classroom discussion. We show that the teacher’s intervention can be crucial in helping the students to modify a wrong example, to generate the right one for the task and to start the long-term process of building up the structure of their own space of examples.     

The Social Construction of Authority Among Peers and Its Implications for Collaborative Mathematics Problem Solving

This article describes a study of how students construct relations of authority during dyadic mathematical work and how teachers’ interactions with students during small group conferences affect subsequent student dynamics. Drawing on the influence framework (Engle, Langer-Osuna, & McKinney de Royston, 2014), I examined interactions when students appropriated their peers’ ideas during collaborative mathematical problem solving and noted that each moment tended to follow particular interactions around authority. Notably, social and intellectual forms of authority became linked in ways that were directly related to how students’ ideas and behaviors were evaluated by the teacher. I close by discussing how the study of authority and influence offers fertile analytic ground to generate new understandings about collaborative student work in mathematics classrooms.     

Teacher Questioning to Promote Justification and Generalization in Mathematics: What Research Practice Has Taught Us

This article explores the teacher's role in classroom environments that center on learning through student exploration, and reinvention, of important mathematics. In such environments, teachers will often work to create situations where students are invited to express their thinking, most especially to peers. How is this done? In the work reported here, both teacher questioning and teacher listening will play important parts, as does the teacher's background understanding of the mathematics and the children. This study focuses especially on teacher questioning in third- and fourth-grade classrooms associated with a longitudinal study now in its eleventh year. Analyses of videotaped data indicate a strong relationship between (1) careful monitoring of students' constructions leading to a problem solution, and (2) the posing of a timely question which can challenge learners to advance their understanding. What a teacher needs to know in order to work well with student explorations has important implications.     

Revoicing in a Multilingual Classroom

The concept of revoicing has recently received a substantial amount of attention within the mathematics education community. One of the primary purposes of revoicing is to promote a deeper conceptual understanding of mathematics by positioning students in relation to one another, thereby facilitating student debate and mathematical argumentation. Our study reexamines revoicing in a multilingual high school algebra classroom; our findings challenge the assumption that revoicing is necessarily tightly connected with classroom argumentation. We demonstrate that a single discursive form, such as revoicing, can play a wide range of valuable functions within the classroom. More importantly, we investigate systematic differences in the ways that revoicing is used, by a particular teacher, across languages. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.     

An Illumination of the Roles of Hands‐On Activities,Discussion, Text Reading,and Writing in Constructing Biology Knowledge in Seventh Grade

A previous study ( Wallace, Yang, Hand, & Hohenshell, 2001 ) indicated that seventh‐grade life science students using a learning tool known as the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) performed significantly better on conceptual test questions than did a control group. In the present study, the researcher studied more deeply how students utilized a variety of knowledge sources while engaged in the SWH, including textbook, teacher‐led discussions, laboratory activities, peer group discussion, and writing (including their cognitive mechanisms and the nature of their written explanations). Six case students were selected based on a range of high to low achievement according to grades. An interpretive analysis of interview and document data was conducted. Of the 6 students, 3 relied on firsthand observations from laboratory activities as their major source of understanding; these students used listening, explaining, and writing most frequently. One student relied solely on textbook and teacher statements and actively rejected laboratory observations, relying primarily on reading and synthesis. Two students integrated laboratory observations with canonical information found in the textbook and other reading sources. They were able to bridge between the different epistemological bases for firsthand observations and authoritative text and blended these into rich and detailed explanations for biology concepts.     

When time is an implicit variable: An investigation of students’ ways of understanding graphing tasks

In this study, we investigate students’ ways of understanding graphing tasks involving quantitative relationships in which time functions as an implicit variable. Through task-based interviews of students ages 14–16 in a summer mathematics program, we observe a variety of ways of understanding, including thematic or visual association, pointwise thinking, and reasoning parametrically about changes in the two variables to be graphed. We argue that, rather than comprising a hierarchy, these ways of understanding complement one another in helping students discover an invariant relationship between two dynamically varying quantities, and develop a graph of the relationship that captures this invariance. From these ways of understanding, we conjecture several mathematical meanings for graphing that may account for students’ behavior when graphing quantitative relationships.