Mix It Up: Teachers' Beliefs on Mixing Mathematics and Science

This paper defines correlation, describes the Mix It Up program, discusses the teachers' beliefs about the value of correlating mathematics and science prior to program participation, and identifies problems teachers associated with correlation before and during the program. Teachers' beliefs about the value of correlation and about the problems associated with correlation are based on results from both quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate the program. Results indicate that teachers believe correlating mathematics and science strengthens students' content knowledge in mathematics and science, bridges the gap between mathematics and science, enhances motivation, and increases students' flexibility in problem solving. Additionally, the areas identified by teachers to be most problematic were time, planning for instruction as a team, and exposure to correlation in the past. The most important finding from the program evaluation indicates that although teachers did not identify content knowledge weaknesses before participating in the program, they did recognize gaps in their own content knowledge during program participation, and more importantly they made connections among these gaps, classroom instruction, and their own students' performance in mathematics and science.     

Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study

In this study, we implemented one-on-one fractions instruction to eight preservice teachers. The intervention, which was based on the principle of Progressive Formalization (Freudenthal, 1983), was centered on problem solving and on progressively formalizing the participants’ intuitive knowledge of fractions. The objectives of the study were to examine the potential effects of the intervention and to uncover specific difficulties experienced by the preservice teachers during instruction. Results revealed improvement on one measure of conceptual knowledge, but not on a transfer task, which required the teachers to generate word problems for number sentences involving fractions. In addition, the qualitative analysis of the videotaped instructional sessions revealed a number of cognitive obstacles encountered by the participants as they attempted to construct meaningful solutions and represent those solutions symbolically. Based on the findings, specific suggestions for modifying the intervention are provided for mathematics teacher educators.     

Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing

Although creativity is often viewed as being associated with the notions of “genius” or exceptional ability, it can be productive for mathematics educators to view creativity instead as an orientation or disposition toward mathematical activity that can be fostered broadly in the general school population. In this article, it is argued that inquiry-oriented mathematics instruction which includes problem-solving and problem-posing tasks and activities can assist students to develop more creative approaches to mathematics. Through the use of such tasks and activities, teachers can increase their students’ capacity with respect to the core dimensions of creativity, namely, fluency, flexibility, and novelty. Because the instructional techniques discussed in this article have been used successfully with students all over the world, there is little reason to believe that creativity-enriched mathematics instruction cannot be used with a broad range of students in order to increase their representational and strategic fluency and flexibility, and their appreciation for novel problems, solution methods, or solutions.     

Teachers' Understandings of Realistic Contexts to Capitalize on Students' Prior Knowledge

The theory of realistic mathematics education establishes that framing mathematics problems in realistic contexts can provide opportunities for guided reinvention. Using data from a study group, I examine geometry teachers' perspectives regarding realistic contexts during a lesson study cycle. I ask the following. (a) What are the participants' perspectives regarding realistic contexts that elicit students' prior knowledge? (b) How are the participants' perspectives of realistic contexts related to teachers' instructional obligations? (c) How do the participants draw upon these perspectives when designing a lesson? The participants identified five characteristics that are needed for realistic contexts: providing entry points to mathematics, using “catchy” and “youthful” contexts, selecting personal contexts for the students, using contexts that are not “too fake” or “forced,” and connecting to the lesson's mathematical content. These characteristics largely relate to the institutional, interpersonal, and individual obligations with some connections with the disciplinary obligation. The participants considered these characteristics when identifying a realistic context for a problem‐based lesson. The context promoted mathematical connections. In addition, the teachers varied the context to increase the relevance for their students. The study has implications for supporting teachers' implementation of problem‐based instruction by attending to teachers' perspectives regarding the obligations shaping their work.     

From formal standards to everyday practice of mathematics learning

This paper uses the example of six Japanese teachers and their mathematics lessons to illustrate how clear, high standards for mathematics instruction are combined with teachers' holistic concern for students. We draw upon data from the Third International Math and Science Study Case Study Project in Japan that was designed to elucidate the context behind the high achievement of Japanese students. Using everyday examples of classroom practice, we illustrate both flexibility in teachers' approach to teaching and adherence to Monbusho's (Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture)Course of Study. Our purpose is to emphasize how flexibility and attention to individual needs by Japanese teachers combine with quality mathematics instruction based on the detailed Japanese curricula. Six teachers' characteristics and lessons (two teachers at each educational level—elementary, junior high, and high school) are described in order to show the variety of teachers who exist in Japan. These teachers use their understanding of theCourse of Study and are supported by their school environment to enhance their students' conceptual understanding of the fundamentals of mathematics. Characteristics of their teaching include: 1) involving the whole class in learning. 2) using extremely focused curriculum guidelines that expect mastery of concepts at each grade level, 3) thoroughly covering mathematics units in an organized and in-depth manner, 4) leading classes as facilitators or guides more often than as lecturers, and 5) focusing on problem solving with the primary goal of developing students' ability to reason, especially to reason inductively. The examples in this paper show how these methods develop in individal classrooms.     

The nature and development of experts’ strategy flexibility for solving equations

Largely absent from the emerging literature on flexibility is a consideration of experts’ flexibility. Do experts exhibit strategy flexibility, as one might assume? If so, how do experts perceive that this capacity developed in themselves? Do experts feel that flexibility is an important instructional outcome in school mathematics? In this paper, we describe results from several interviews with experts to explore strategy flexibility for solving equations. We conducted interviews with eight content experts, where we asked a number of questions about flexibility and also engaged the experts in problem solving. Our analysis indicates that the experts that were interviewed did exhibit strategy flexibility in the domain of linear equation solving, but they did not consistently select the most efficient method for solving a given equation. However, regardless of whether these experts used the best method on a given problem, they nevertheless showed an awareness of and an appreciation of efficient and elegant problem solutions. The experts that we spoke to were capable of making subtle judgments about the most appropriate strategy for a given problem, based on factors including mental and rapid testing of strategies, the problem solver’s goals (e.g., efficiency, error-free execution, elegance) and familiarity with a given problem type. Implications for future research on flexibility and on mathematics instruction are discussed.     

Preservice Teachers' Use of Multiple Representations In Solving Arithmetic Mean Problems

The development of preservice teachers' views of various mathematical concepts involves building a repertoire of flexible representations of the concepts they teach. In this study, science and mathematics preservice teachers (n = 19) were asked to solve graphical and numerical problems involving the arithmetic mean and to provide two different solutions for each problem. Background information about the preservice teachers was obtained, including subject area specialty, type of statistics courses previously taken, type of science laboratory courses previously taken, and prior experience with real data outside the classroom. In solving the problems, some participants presented two different methods: algorithmic computation and balancing deviations about the mean. A significant difference was found between science and mathematics preservice teachers in the use of balancing deviations to solve the problems but not in the use of the computational algorithm.     

The Impact of Enacted Mathematics Curriculum Models on Prospective Elementary Teachers' Course Perceptions and Beliefs

This paper communicates the impact of prospective teachers' learning of mathematics using novel curriculum materials in an innovative classroom setting. Two sections of a mathematics content course for prospective elementary teachers used different text materials and instructional approaches. The primary mathematical authorities were the instructor and text in the textbook section and the prospective teachers in the curriculum materials section. After one semester, teachers in the curriculum materials section (n= 34) placed significantly more importance on classroom group work and discussions, less on instructor lecture and explanation, and less on textbooks having practice problems, examples, and explanations. They valued student exploration over practice. In the textbook section (n= 19), there was little change in the teachers' beliefs, in which practice was valued over exploration. These results highlight the positive impact of experiences with innovative curriculum materials on prospective elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics instruction.     

Searching for good mathematics instruction at primary school level valued in Taiwan

In this article, we aim to provide a glimpse of what is counted as good mathematics instruction from Taiwanese perspectives and of various approaches developed and used for achieving high-quality mathematics instruction. The characteristics of good mathematics instruction from Taiwanese perspectives were first collected and discussed from three types of information sources. Although the number of characteristics of good mathematics instruction may vary from one source to another, they can be generally organized in three phases including lesson design before instruction, classroom instruction during the lesson and activities after lesson. In addition to the general overview of mathematics classroom instruction valued in Taiwan, we also analyzed 92 lessons from six experienced teachers whose instructional practices were generally valued in local schools and counties. We identified and discussed the characteristics of their instructional practices in three themes: features of problems and their uses in classroom instruction, aspects of problem–solution discussion and reporting, and the discussion of solution methods. To identify and promote high-quality mathematics instruction, various approaches have been developed and used in Taiwan including the development and use of new textbooks and teachers’ guides, teaching contests, master teacher training program, and teacher professional development programs.     

Prospective Teachers' Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Lens for Interpreting Experiences in a Standards‐Based Mathematics Course

In a mathematics course for prospective elementary teachers, we strove to model standards‐based pedagogy. However, an end‐of‐class reflection revealed the prospective teachers were considering incorporating standards‐based strategies in their future classrooms in ways different from our intent. Thus, we drew upon the framework presented by Simon, Tzur, Heinz, Kinzel, and Smith to examine the prospective teachers' perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning and to address two research questions. What perspectives on the learning and teaching of mathematics do prospective elementary teachers hold? How do their perspectives impact their perception of standards‐based instruction in a mathematics course and their future teaching plans? Qualitative analyses of reflections from 106 prospective teachers revealed that they viewed mathematics as a logical domain representative of an objective reality. Their instructional preferences included providing firsthand opportunities for elementary students to perceive mathematics. They did not take into account the impact of a student's conceptions upon what is learned. Thus, the prospective teachers plan to incorporate standards‐based strategies to provide active experiences for their future elementary students, but they fail to base such strategies upon students' current mathematical conceptions. Throughout, the need to address prospective teachers' underlying perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning is stressed.     

The Influences of Three Interventions on Prospective Elementary Teachers' Beliefs About the Knowledge Base Needed for Teaching Mathematics

To meet the challenge to reform mathematics education, effective opportunities to learn are needed to promote prospective elementary school teachers' development of the knowledge base that supports teaching for mathematical proficiency. This article describes three professional development interventions and their influence on prospective teachers' beliefs about mathematics, how children learn mathematics, and mathematics teaching. The three interventions consisted of problem‐solving journals, structured interviews, and peer teaching that were integrated in a PreK‐6 mathematics methods course. Results of precourse and postcourse survey data are included that measured 24 prospective teachers' beliefs about the knowledge base needed to teach elementary school mathematics. Data indicated that using these interventions and other course experiences facilitated change in the prospective teachers' beliefs, with a shift toward reform‐oriented mathematics education perspectives.     

Mathematics teachers’ views about the limited utility of real analysis: A transport model hypothesis

In the United States and elsewhere, prospective teachers of secondary mathematics are usually required to complete numerous advanced mathematics courses before obtaining certification. However, several research studies suggest that teachers’ experiences in these advanced mathematics courses have little influence on their pedagogical practice and efficacy. To understand this phenomenon, we presented 14 secondary mathematics teachers with four statements and proofs in real analysis that related to secondary content and asked the participants to discuss whether these proofs could inform their teaching of secondary mathematics. In analyzing participants’ remarks, we propose that many teachers view the utility of real analysis in secondary school mathematics teaching using a transport model, where the perceived importance of a real analysis explanation is dependent upon the teacher’s ability to transport that explanation directly into their instruction in a secondary mathematics classroom. Consequently, their perceived value of a real analysis course in their teacher preparation is inherently limited. We discuss implications of the transport model on secondary mathematics teacher education.     

Establishing the link between the graph of a parametric curve and the derivatives of its component functions

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to explore the effects of an instructional intervention in which GeoGebra and the think-pair-share method were used to teach the relationship between the graph of a parametric curve and the derivatives of its component functions. The participants in the study were 19 prospective mathematics teachers. To assess the understanding of the participants regarding the content of the instruction, two comparable tests were administered as a pre- and post-test. In order to determine whether there was a difference between the students’ performance on the two tests, a paired samples t-test was conducted on the test scores; the results revealed a significant difference in favour of the post-test. Thus, it was concluded that the adopted teaching method, which included the use of GeoGebra, in delivering the focused content had a positive impact on the students’ understanding.     

Addressing prospective elementary teachers’ mathematics subject matter knowledge through action research

There is international dissatisfaction regarding the standard of mathematics subject matter knowledge (MSMK) evident among both qualified and prospective elementary teachers. Ireland is no exception. Following increasing anecdotal evidence of prospective elementary teachers in one Irish College of Education (provider of initial teacher education programme) demonstrating weaknesses in this regard, this study sought to examine and address the issue through two cycles of action research. The examination of the nature of prospective teachers’ MSMK (as well as related beliefs in the main study) informed the design and implementation of an intervention to address the issue. A mixed method approach was taken throughout. In both cycles, Shapiro's criteria were used as a conceptual framework for the evaluation of the initiative. This paper focuses on the perceived and actual effects of the intervention on participants’ MSMK. As well as its contribution at a local and national level, the study provides an Irish perspective on approaches taken to address the phenomenon internationally.     

Distinguishing Features of Mechanical and Human Problem-Solving

Over the years, research in mathematical problem-solving has examined expert/novice problem-solving performance on various types of problems and subjects. In particular, DeFranco examined two groups of Ph.D. mathematicians as they solved four mathematics problems and found that although all were content experts, only one group were problem-solving experts. Based on this study, this article posits the notion that one distinguishing feature between experts and novices is that experts tend to look for special features of a problem and use algorithms only as a “fail-safe” system while novices act like “machines” relying on algorithms to solve the problems. Why? The article explores the idea that novice problem solvers learned to solve problems the way they learned proof, that is, in a formal, abstract and mechanizable way. Beliefs about proof and the culture in which it is practiced help frame a mathematician's view of the discipline and ultimately impacts classroom practice. The authors believe that current classroom instruction tends to create a culture that fosters algorithmic proficiency and a “machine-like” approach to the learning of mathematics and problem-solving. Further, they argue that mathematicians need to be aware of the distinction between knowing a proof is true and explaining why it is true. When these distinctions are appreciated and practiced during classroom instruction, then and only then will students begin to acquire the mathematical knowledge to become better problem solvers.     

The effect of quantitative reasoning on prospective mathematics teachers’ proof comprehension: The case of real numbers

We report a mixed-methods research study investigating the effect of quantitative reasoning on prospective mathematics teachers’ comprehension of a proof on real numbers. Nineteen prospective mathematics teachers engaged in quantitative reasoning while developing real numbers as rational number sequences in a series of instructional activities. All participants completed a proof comprehension assessment prior to and upon completion of the instruction. Six of the prospective mathematics teachers also participated in semi-structured interviews after the post-test. Results showed a significant difference in proof comprehension performance between the pre- and post-tests. Moreover, results from the interviews showed that prospective teachers reasoned quantitatively on the proof comprehension dimensions. Results suggest that engaging in quantitative reasoning during instruction may help to develop proof comprehension, particularly in situations involving the analysis of proofs entailing properties of the real number system. We recommend embedding quantitative reasoning in teacher education and professional development programs to facilitate mathematics teachers’ proof comprehension and proving activities.     

Investigating Elementary Mathematics Curricula: Focus on Students With Learning Disabilities

The purpose of this study was to investigate three elementary mathematics curricula to examine the accessibility for students with learning disabilities (LD) with regards to challenges associated with working memory. We chose to focus on students' experiences when finding the area of composite shapes due to the multiple steps involved for solving these problems and the potential for these problems to tax working memory. We conducted a qualitative analysis of how each curriculum provided opportunities for students with LD to engage with these problems. During our analysis, we focused on instruction that emphasized visual representations (e.g., manipulatives, drawings, and diagrams), facilitated mathematical conversations, and developed cognitive and metacognitive skills. Our findings indicated a need for practitioners to consider how each curriculum provides instruction for storage and organization of information as well as how each curriculum develops students' thinking processes and conceptual understanding of mathematics. We concluded that all three curricula provide potentially effective strategies for teaching students with LD to solve multi‐step problems, such as area of composite shapes problems, but teachers using any of these curricula will likely need to supplement the curriculum to meet the needs of students with LD.     

Effective collaboration in the productive failure process

Productive failure is a learning design that encompasses problem solving prior to instruction and the learning that occurs during and after this process. In the mathematics education literature, there is a need for analyses of students’ interactions that occur as they collaborate during the productive failure process. In this paper, we contribute to this area by taking a closer look at students’ interactions that characterize an effective productive failure process. In analyzing video footage of two different groups of students working on invention tasks in a flipped mathematics classroom, we observed that the productive failure process seemed to work best in groups of students among whom the instructional design evoked students’ intellectual need and curiosity. These students also developed a set routine for solving problems whose solutions are difficult to find without prior direct instruction on the topic, which proved valuable on follow-up in-class and posttest problems.     

The Effect of a Horseshoe Crab Citizen Science Program on Middle School Student Science Performance and STEM Career Motivation

The purpose of the present quasi‐experimental study was to examine the impact of a horseshoe crab citizen science program on student achievement and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career motivation with 86 (n = 86) eighth‐grade students. The treatment group conducted fieldwork with naturalists and collected data for a professional biologist studying horseshoe crab speciation and a mock survey. The comparison group studied curriculum related to horseshoe crabs in the science classroom. A series of measures related to self‐efficacy, interest, outcome expectations, choice goals, and content knowledge were given to participants before and after the intervention. It was hypothesized that students would report higher motivational beliefs regarding science and show higher levels of achievement following the intervention than the comparison group. Support was shown for most of the hypotheses. In addition, path analyses indicated that students' motivational beliefs influence content knowledge and outcome expectations, which in turn affect their career goals. These results have implications for incorporating authentic fieldwork within a formal school structure as an effective method for promoting student achievement and STEM career motivation.     

An investigation of preservice teachers’ use of guess and check in solving a semi open-ended mathematics problem

Open-ended problems have been regarded as powerful tools for teaching mathematics. This study examined the problem solving of eight mathematics/science middle-school teachers. A semi-structured interview was conducted with (PTs) after completing an open-ended triangle task with four unique solutions. Of particular emphasis was how the PTs used a specific heuristic strategy. The results showed that the primary strategy PTs employed in attempting to solve the triangle problem task was guess and check; however, from the PTs’ reflections, we found there existed misapplications of guess and check as a systematic problem-solving strategy. In order to prepare prospective teachers to effectively teach, teacher educators should pay more attention to the mathematical proficiency of PTs, particularly their abilities to systematically and efficiently use guess and check while solving problems and explain their solutions and reasoning to middle-school students.