\mathfrak{E} of topological spaces II

In this paper, we obtain analogues, in the situation of \(\mathfrak{E}\) -extensions, of Magill's theorem on lattices of compactifications. We define an epireflective subcategory of the categoryT 2 of all Hausdorff spaces to be admissive (respectively finitely admissive) if for any \(\mathfrak{E}\) -regular spaceX, every Hausdorff quotient of \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} X\) which is Urysohn on \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} X - X\) (respectively which is finitary on \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} X - X\) ) and which is identity onX, has \(\mathfrak{E}\) . We notice that there are many proper epireflective subcategories ofT 2 containing all compact spaces and which are admissive; there are many such which are not admissive but finitely admissive. We prove that when \(\mathfrak{E}\) is a finitely admissive epireflective subcategory ofT 2, then the lattices of finitary \(\mathfrak{E}\) -extensions of two spacesX andY are isomorphic if and only if \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} X - X\) and \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} Y - Y\) are homeomorphic. Further if \(\mathfrak{E}\) is admissive, then the lattices of Urysohn \(\mathfrak{E}\) -extensions ofX andY are isomorphic if and only if \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} X - X\) and \(\beta _\mathfrak{E} Y - Y\) are homeomorphic.     

On some filters and ideals of the Medvedev lattice

Let \(\mathfrak{M}\) be the Medvedev lattice: this paper investigates some filters and ideals (most of them already introduced by Dyment, [4]) of \(\mathfrak{M}\) . If \(\mathfrak{G}\) is any of the filters or ideals considered, the questions concerning \(\mathfrak{G}\) which we try to answer are: (1) is \(\mathfrak{G}\) prime? What is the cardinality of \({\mathfrak{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathfrak{M} \mathfrak{G}}} \right. \kern-0em} \mathfrak{G}}\) ? Occasionally, we point out some general facts on theT-degrees or the partial degrees, by which these questions can be answered.     

Analytische Fortsetzbarkeit von zufälligen Potenzreihen bezüglich abhängiger Zufallsvariabler

Рассматриваются слу чайная величина \(\mathfrak{X} = (X_n (\omega ))\) , удовлетворяющая усл овиюE(X _n ⁴ )≦M, и соответствующ ий случайный степенн ой ряд \(f_x (z;\omega ) = \mathop \sum \limits_{n = 0}^\infty a_n X_n (\omega )z^n\) . Устанавливаются тео ремы непродолжимост и почти наверное:

1. дляf _x при условиях с лабой мультипликати вности на \(\mathfrak{X}\) ,
2. для \(f_{\tilde x}\) , где \(\mathop \mathfrak{X}\limits^ \sim = (\mathop X\limits^ \sim _n )\) есть подп оследовательность в \(\mathfrak{X}\) ,
3. для по крайней мере од ного из рядовf _x′ илиf _x″ , где \(\mathfrak{X}'\) и \(\mathfrak{X}''\) — некоторые п ерестановки \(\mathfrak{X}\) , выбираемые универс ально, т. е. независимо от коэффициентовa _n .

     

Einige aussagen über die reduktion kohärenter analytischer modulgarben

Let (X, ) be a complex space and \(\mathfrak{F}\) a coherent -module. In analogy to the reduction red one can define a reduction \(\mathfrak{F}\) _red= \(\mathfrak{F}\) / \(\mathfrak{F}\) ′, where \(\mathfrak{F}\) ′ ? \(\mathfrak{F}\) is the subsheaf of “nilvalent” elements of \(\mathfrak{F}\) . (Even if X is reduced, we may have \(\mathfrak{F}\) ′ ≠ 0.) We prove that \(\mathfrak{F}\) ′ is coherent. Therefore we can construct the sheaf \(\mathfrak{F}\) (²)=( \(\mathfrak{F}\) ′)′ of nilvalent elements with respect to \(\mathfrak{F}\) ′. Iterating this process, we get a sequence ( \(\mathfrak{F}\) ⁽ⁿ⁾)n∈N of subsheaves of \(\mathfrak{F}\) . We show that on every compact subset of X the sheaves \(\mathfrak{F}\) (ⁿ) vanish for n sufficiently large (Satz 2).     

On the limit superior of sequences of sets

qVЕРхНИИ пРЕДЕл пОслЕД ОВАтЕльНОстИ МНОжЕс тВA _n ОпРЕДЕльЕтсь сООтНО шЕНИЕМ \(\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{n \to \infty } A_n = \mathop \cap \limits_{k = 1}^\infty \mathop \cup \limits_{n = k}^\infty A_n . B\) стАтьЕ РАссМАтРИВА Етсь слЕДУУЩИИ ВОпРО с: ЧтО МОжНО скАжАть О ВЕРхНИх пРЕДЕлАх \(\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{k \to \infty } A_{n_k }\) , еслИ ИжВЕстНО, ЧтО пРЕсЕЧЕНИь \(\mathop \cap \limits_{k = 1}^\infty A_{n_k }\) «МАлы» Дль кАж-ДОИ пОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНОстИ \((A_{n_k } )\) ? ДОкАжыВАЕтсь, Ч тО

1. ЕслИ \(\mathop \cap \limits_{k = 1}^\infty A_{n_k }\) — кОНЕЧНОЕ МНО жЕстВО Дль кАжДОИ пОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНОстИ \((A_{n_k } )\) , тО НАИДЕтсь тАкАь пОДпО слЕДОВАтЕльНОсть, Дл ь кОтОРОИ МНОжЕстВО \(\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{k \to \infty } A_{n_k }\) сЧЕтНО;
2. ЕслИ \(2^{\aleph _0 } = \aleph _1\) , тО сУЩЕстВУЕ т тАкАь пОслЕДОВАтЕл ьНОсть (A_n), ЧтО \(\mathop \cap \limits_{k = 1}^\infty A_{n_k }\) — сЧЕтНОЕ МНОжЕстВО Дль лУБОИ п ОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНОстИ \((A_{n_k } )\) , НО \(\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{k \to \infty } A_{n_k }\) ИМЕЕт МОЩ-НОсть кОНтИНУУМА;
3. ЕслИA _n — БОРЕлЕ ВскИЕ МНОжЕстВА В НЕкОтОРО М пОлНОМ сЕпАРАБЕльНО М МЕтРИЧЕскОМ пРОстРАНстВЕ, И \(\mathop \cap \limits_{k = 1}^\infty A_{n_k }\) — сЧЕт НОЕ МНОжЕстВО Дль кАж ДОИ пОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНОстИ \((A_{n_k } )\) , тО сУЩЕстВУЕт тАкАь п ОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНОсть, ЧтО \(\mathop {\lim sup}\limits_{k \to \infty } A_{n_k }\) — сЧЕтНОЕ МНОжЕстВО. кРОМЕ тОгО, ДОкАжАНО, Ч тО В слУЧАьх А) И В) В пОслЕДОВАтЕльНОстИ (A _n ) сУЩЕстВУЕт схОДьЩА ьсь пОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНО сть.

кРОМЕ тОгО, ДОкАжАНО, Ч тО В слУЧАьх А) И В) В пОслЕДОВАтЕльНОстИ (А _n ) сУЩЕстВУЕт схОДьЩ Аьсь пОДпОслЕДОВАтЕльНО сть.     

On initial segments of degrees of constructibility

Let \(\mathfrak{M}\) be a fixed countable standard transitive model of ZF+V=L. We consider the structure Mod of degrees of constructibility of real numbers x with respect to \(\mathfrak{M}\) such that \(\mathfrak{M}\) (x) is a model. An initial segment Q \( \subseteq \) Mod is called realizable if some extension of \(\mathfrak{M}\) with the same ordinals contains exclusively the degrees of constructibility of real numbers from Q (and is a model of Z FC). We prove the following: if Q is a realizable initial segment, then $$[y \in Q \to y< x]]\& \forall z\exists y[z< x \to y \in Q\& \sim [y< z]]]$$ .     

Zur Theorie der Polynomringe

Let \(\mathfrak{B}\) be a variety of rings,R a ring of \(\mathfrak{B}\) andx an indeterminate. The free compositionR(x, \(\mathfrak{B}\) ) ofR and the free algebra of \(\mathfrak{B}\) generated byx, is called the \(\mathfrak{B}\) -polynomial ring inx the variety of rings, rings with identity, commutative rings or commutative rings with identity resp. We prove some results about relations between the polynomial ringsR(x, \(\mathfrak{B}\) ), whereR is fixed and \(\mathfrak{B}\) runs over these varieties. Moreover we construct normal form systems for certain polynomial ringsR(x, \(\mathfrak{B}\) ).     

ОБ ИНтЕРпОлИРОВАНИИ В кОМплЕксНОИ ОБлАст И

LetD be a simply connected domain, the boundary of which is a closed Jordan curveγ; \(\mathfrak{M} = \left\{ {z_{k, n} } \right\}\) , 0≦k≦n; n=1, 2, 3, ..., a matrix of interpolation knots, \(\mathfrak{M} \subset \Gamma ; A_c \left( {\bar D} \right)\) the space of the functions that are analytic inD and continuous on \(\bar D; \left\{ {L_n \left( {\mathfrak{M}; f, z} \right)} \right\}\) the sequence of the Lagrange interpolation polynomials. We say that a matrix \(\mathfrak{M}\) satisfies condition (B _m ), \(\mathfrak{M}\) ∈(B _m ), if for some positive integerm there exist a setB _m containingm points and a sequencen _{p p=1} ^∞ of integers such that the series \(\mathop \Sigma \limits_{p = 1}^\infty \frac{1}{{n_p }}\) diverges and for all pairsn _i ,n _j ∈{n _p } _p=1 ^∞ the set \(\left( {\bigcap\limits_{k = 0}^{n_i } {z_{k, n_i } } } \right)\bigcap {\left( {\bigcup\limits_{k = 0}^{n_j } {z_{k, n_j } } } \right)} \) is contained inB _m . The main result reads as follows. {Let D=z: ¦z¦ \(\Gamma = \partial \bar D\) and let the matrix \(\mathfrak{M} \subset \Gamma \) satisfy condition (B_m). Then there exists a function \(f \in A_c \left( {\bar D} \right)\) such that the relation $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left| {L_n \left( {\mathfrak{M}, f, z} \right)} \right| = \infty $$ holds almost everywhere on γ.     

On positive definite measures

In this paper we study the Fourier transform of unbounded measures on a locally compact groupG. After a short introductory section containing background material, especially results established byL. Argabright andJ. Gil De Lamadrid we turn to the main subjects of the paper: first we characterize \(\Re \left( G \right), \mathfrak{J}\left( G \right)\) andB(G) cones in \(\mathfrak{W}\left( G \right)\) . After that we establish the subspace \(\mathfrak{W}_\Delta \left( G \right)\) of \(\mathfrak{W}\left( G \right)\) which contains \(\mathfrak{W}_p \left( G \right)\) , the linear span of all positive definite measures.     

Note on the distribution of zeros of polynomials

Let \(\mathfrak{M}\) be the set of zeros of the polynomial \(P(z) = \sum\nolimits_{k = 0}^m {A_k S_k (z)} \) , where S_k(z) are functions defined in some region B and the coefficients A_k are arbitrary numbers from the ring $$0 \leqslant \tau _k \leqslant |A_k - a_k | \leqslant R_{_k }< \infty $$ . Conditions necessary and sufficient to ensure that z ∈ \(\mathfrak{M}\) are obtained.     

Fibered incidence groups which are not kinematic

An incidence space \((\beta ,\mathfrak{L})\) which is obtained from an affine space \((\beta _a ,\mathfrak{L}_a )\) by omitting a hyperplane is calledstripe space. If \((\beta _a ,\mathfrak{L}_a )\) is desarguesian, then \(\beta \) can be provided with a group operation “ ○ ” such that \((\beta ,\mathfrak{L}, \circ )\) becomes a kinematic space calledstripe group. It will be shown that there are stripe groups \((\beta ,\mathfrak{L}, \circ )\) where the incidence structure \(\mathfrak{L}\) can be replaced by another incidence structure ? such that \((\beta ,\Re , \circ )\) is afibered incidence group which is not kinematic. An application on translation planes concerning the group of affinities is also given.     

Die metrisierbaren linearen Teilräume des Raumes\mathfrak{O}_M von L. Schwartz

In Schwartz' terminology, a real or complex valued functionf, defined and infinitely differentiable on ? _n , belongs to \(\mathfrak{O}_M \) iff, as well as any of its derivatives, is at most of polynomial growth. The topology of \(\mathfrak{O}_M \) is defined by the seminorms sup{∣?(x)D ^p f(x)∣;x∈? ⁿ }, where ? belongs to \(\mathfrak{S}\) andD ^p is any derivative. It is well-known that \(\mathfrak{O}_M \) is non-metrisable. For any μ: ? ⁿ →?, let \(\mathfrak{B}_\mu \) be the space of all infinitely differentiable functionsf satisfying, for eachp, sup{∣(1+∣x∣²)^?μ(p) D ^p f(x)∣;x∈? ⁿ }<∞, with the obvious topology. These spaces, which are of very little use elsewhere in the theory of distributions, can be conveniently applied to characterise the metrisable linear subspaces of \(\mathfrak{O}_M \) : A linear subspace of \(\mathfrak{O}_M \) is metrisable if and only if it is, algebraically and topologically, a subspace of some \(\mathfrak{B}_\mu \) .     

The index of centralizers of elements in classical Lie algebras

The index of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ is the minimum of dimensions of the stabilizers $\mathfrak{g}_\alpha $ over all covectors $\alpha \in \mathfrak{g}^ * $ . Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a reductive Lie algebra over a field $\mathbb{K}$ of characteristic ≠ = 2. Élashvili conjectured that the index of $\mathfrak{g}_\alpha $ is always equal to the index, or, which is the same, the rank of $\mathfrak{g}$ . In this article, Élashvili’s conjecture is proved for classical Lie algebras. Furthermore, it is shown that if $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}_n $ or $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{p}_{2n} $ and $e \in \mathfrak{g}$ is a nilpotent element, then the coadjoint action of $\mathfrak{g}_e $ has a generic stabilizer. For $\mathfrak{g}$ , we give examples of nilpotent elements $e \in \mathfrak{g}$ such that the coadjoint action of $\mathfrak{g}_e $ does not have a generic stabilizer.     

Rational approximations of real numbers

For anyx ∈ r put $$c(x) = \overline {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to \infty } } \mathop {\min }\limits_{(p,q\mathop {) \in Z}\limits_{q \leqslant t} \times N} t\left| {qx - p} \right|.$$ . Let [x₀; x₁,..., x_n, ...] be an expansion of x into a continued fraction and let \(M = \{ x \in J,\overline {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } } x_n< \infty \}\) .Forx∈M put D(x)=c(x)/(1?c(x)). The structure of the set \(\mathfrak{D} = \{ D(x),x \in M\}\) is studied. It is shown that $$\mathfrak{D} \cap (3 + \sqrt 3 ,(5 + 3\sqrt 3 )/2) = \{ D(x^{(n,3} )\} _{n = 0}^\infty \nearrow (5 + 3\sqrt 3 )/2,$$ where \(x^{(n,3)} = [\overline {3;(1,2)_n ,1} ].\) This yields for \(\mu = \inf \{ z,\mathfrak{D} \supset (z, + \infty )\}\) (“origin of the ray”) the following lower bound: μ?(5+3√3)/2=5.0n>(5 + 3/3)/2=5.098.... Suppose a∈n. Put \(M(a) = \{ x \in M,\overline {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } } x_n = a\}\) , \(\mathfrak{D}(a) = \{ D(x),x \in M(a)\}\) . The smallest limit point of \(\mathfrak{D}(a)(a \geqslant 2)\) is found. The structure of (a) is studied completely up to the smallest limit point and elucidated to the right of it.     

Groups that are not generated by certain\mathfrak{X}-abnormal subgroups

In the theory of formations the concept of an \(\mathfrak{X}\) -normal maximal subgroup is widely used, being some formation [1]. In this note the concept of \(\mathfrak{X}\) normality is introduced for arbitrary subgroups. Subgroups that are not \(\mathfrak{X}\) -normal are called \(\mathfrak{X}\) -abnormal. Finite groups that are not generated by S-abnormal n-th maximal subgroups (n=1, 2, 3, 4) are studied, where S is the formation of all supersolvable groups. The general nature of the results of [3–6] is brought out.     

Semidirect sums of Lie algebras

This paper examines the problem of classifying finite-dimensional Lie algebras over the field C with a given radical \(\mathfrak{r}\) and also the problem of classifying algebraic Lie algebras with a given nilpotent radical \(\mathfrak{r}\) . A detailed study is made of the case when \(\mathfrak{r}\) is the nilpotent radical of a parabolic subalgebra of a semisimple Lie algebra.     

Ultrapowers ofL 1(μ) and the subsequence splitting principle

We study the ultrapowers $L_1 (\mu )_\mathfrak{U} $ of aL ₁(μ) space, by describing the components of the well-known representation $L_1 (\mu )_\mathfrak{U} = L_1 (\mu _\mathfrak{U} ) \oplus _1 L_1 (\nu _\mathfrak{U} )$ , and we give a representation of the projection from $L_1 (\mu )_\mathfrak{U} $ onto $L_1 (\mu _\mathfrak{U} )$ . Moreover, the subsequence splitting principle forL ₁(μ) motivates the following question: if $\mathfrak{V}$ is an ultrafilter on ? and $[f_i ] \in L_1 (\mu )_\mathfrak{V} $ , is it possible to find a weakly convergent sequence (g _i ) ?L ₁(μ) following $\mathfrak{V}$ and a disjoint sequence (h _i ) ?L ₁(μ) such that [f _i ]=[g _i ]+[h _i ]? If $\mathfrak{V}$ is a selective ultrafilter, we find a positive answer by showing that $f = [f_i ] \in L_1 (\mu )_\mathfrak{V} $ belongs to $L_1 (\mu _{_\mathfrak{V} } )$ if and only if its representatives {f _i } are weakly convergent following $\mathfrak{V}$ and $f \in L_1 (\nu _\mathfrak{V} )$ if and only if it admits a representative consisting of pairwise disjoint functions. As a consequence, we obtain a new proof of the subsequence splitting principle. If $\mathfrak{V}$ is not a p-point then the above characterizations of $L_1 (\nu _{_\mathfrak{V} } )$ and $L_1 (\nu _{_\mathfrak{V} } )$ fail and the answer to the question is negative.     

A ℤ-Simplex Algorithm with partial updates

The Simplex primal and dual methods, for the solution of $$\max \left\{ {c^T x:Ax = b, x \geqslant 0} \right\},$$ were presented previously in terms of certain bases ? and \(\mathbb{Y}\) ofN(A) andR(A ^T ) respectively. In these implementations, called the ?-Simplex Algorithm and the \(\mathbb{Y}\) -Dual Method, the bases ? and \(\mathbb{Y}\) (giving the edges of the polyhedron in question at the given basic feasible solution) are updated at each iteration. In this paper we show that only partial updates of ? are needed in the ?-Simplex Algorithm, analogously to the partial updates in the Revised Simplex Algorithm. Similar results can be given for the \(\mathbb{Y}\) -Dual Method.     

A Characterization of Projective Spaces by a Set of Planes

This note deals with the following question: How many planes of a linear space (P, $\mathfrak{L}$ ) must be known as projective planes to ensure that (P, $\mathfrak{L}$ ) is a projective space? The following answer is given: If for any subset M of a linear space (P, $\mathfrak{L}$ ) the restriction (M, $\mathfrak{L}$ )(M)) is locally complete, and if for every plane E of (M, $\mathfrak{L}$ (M)) the plane $\bar E$ generated by E is a projective plane, then (P, $\mathfrak{L}$ ) is a projective space (cf. 5.6). Or more generally: If for any subset M of P the restriction (M, $\mathfrak{L}$ (M)) is locally complete, and if for any two distinct coplanar lines G1, G2 ∈ $\mathfrak{L}$ (M) the lines $\bar G_1 ,\bar G_2 \varepsilon \mathfrak{L}$ generated by G1, G2 have a nonempty intersection and $\overline {G_1 \cup {\text{ }}G_2 }$ satisfies the exchange condition, then (P, $\mathfrak{L}$ ) is a generalized projective space.