Block and star block copolymers by mechanism transformation 9: Preparation and characterization of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(1,3‐dioxepane)/polystyrene ABC miktoarm star copolymers by combination of reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer polymerization and cationic ring‐opening polymerization

The miktoarm ABC star copolymer with three different branches, polystyrene (PS), poly(1,3‐dioxepane) (PDOP), and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), was successfully prepared. PS with two transfer groups, hydroxyl and dithiobenzoate groups [PS‐HECA‐SC(S)Ph], was synthesized by the reaction of a dithiobenzoate group at the end of PS with hydroxyethylene cinnamate (HECA) in tetrahydrofuran solution. Then, the cationic ring‐opening polymerization of 1,3‐dioxepane was initiated by triflic acid in the presence of PS‐HECA‐SC(S)Ph and diblock copolymer, PS‐PDOP, was formed. Finally, the diblock copolymer with the dithiobenzoate group situated between the two blocks was used in the reversible addition–fragmentation transfer (RAFT) process of methyl methacrylate (MMA). The miktoarm ABC star copolymer S(PS)(PDOP)(PMMA) was characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 1243–1250, 2003     

Improvement of the thermal stability of cluster‐crosslinked polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) by optimization of the polymerization conditions

The polymerization conditions for polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) crosslinked by 0.5 mol % of the cluster Zr₆O₄(OH)₄(methacrylate)₁₂ were optimized by applying a step polymerization procedure. The onset of thermal decomposition was thus increased up to about 50° for polystyrene and about 110° for poly(methyl methacrylate). The increase in thermal stability correlated with a higher char yield. The glass transition temperatures were also increased by about 15°. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6586–6591, 2005     

Luminescent polymeric ruthenium complexes with polystyrene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) macroligands: The sequential activation of initiator sites for blocks generated by parallel polymerization mechanisms

The synthesis of polystyrene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymers with a luminescent ruthenium(II) tris(bipyridine) [Ru(bpy)₃] complex at the block junction is described. The macroligand precursor, polystyrene bipyridine‐poly(methyl methacrylate) [bpy(PS–H)(PMMA)], was synthesized via the atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate from two independent, sequentially activated initiating sites. Both polymerization steps resulted in the growth of blocks with sizes consistent with monomer loading and narrow molecular weight distributions (i.e., polydispersity index < 1.3). Subsequent reactions with ruthenium(II) bis(bipyridine) dichloride [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂] in the presence of Ag⁺ generated the ruthenium tris(bipyridine)‐centered diblock, which is of interest for the imaging of block copolymer microstructures and for incorporation into new photonic materials. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 4250–4255, 2002     

Synthesis of carbosilane block copolymers by means of a living anionic polymerization of 1,1-diethylsilacyclobutane

Block polymerization of 1,1-diethylsilacyclobutane with styrene derivatives and methacrylate derivatives was investigated. Sequential addition of styrene to a living poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane), which was prepared from phenyllithium and 1,1-diethylsilacyclobutane in THF–hexane at −48°C, gave poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane)-b-polystyrene. Similarly, addition of 4-(tert-butyldimethylsiloxy)styrene to the living poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane) provided poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane)-b-poly(4-(tert-butyldimethylsiloxy)styrene). Poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) was obtained by treatment of living poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane) with 1,1-diphenylethylene followed by an addition of methyl methacrylate. Poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane)-b-poly(2-(tert-butyldimethylsiloxy)ethyl methacrylate) was also synthesized by adding 2-(tert-butyldimethylsiloxy)ethyl methacrylate to the living poly(1,1-diethylsilabutane) which was end-capped with 1,1-diphenylethylene in the presence of lithium chloride. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 36: 2699–2706, 1998     

A predictive approach based on the Simha–Somcynsky free‐volume theory for the effect of dissolved gas on viscosity and glass transition temperature of polymeric mixtures

The gas concentration and pressure effects on the shear viscosity of molten polymers were modeled by using a unified approach based on a free volume theory. A concentration and pressure dependent “shift factor,” which accounts for free volume changes associated with polymer‐gas mixing and with variation of absolute pressure as well as for dilution effects, has been herein used to scale the pure polymer viscosity, as evaluated at the same temperature and atmospheric pressure. The expression of the free volume of the polymer/gas mixture was obtained by using the Simha and Somcynsky equation of state for multicomponent fluids. Experimental shear viscosity data, obtained for poly(ε‐caprolactone) with nitrogen and carbon dioxide were successfully predicted by using this approach. Good agreement with predictions was also found in the case of viscosity data reported in the literature for polystyrene and poly(dimethylsiloxane) with carbon dioxide. Free volume arguments have also been used to predict the T_g depression for polystyrene/carbon dioxide and for poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon dioxide mixtures, based on calculations performed, again, with the Simha and Somcynsky theory. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1863–1873, 2006     

Rapid spectroscopic confirmation of the presence of polystyrene in polymer particles of mixed composition

A technique for rapid determination of the presence of polystyrene in individual micron-diameter polymer particles of mixed composition is presented. This technique is based upon observation of visible emission from conjugated regions of the polymer backbone, generated photochemically, while the particle is held in an optical trap. Particle emission characteristics are dependent upon particle size and suspending solvent. Emission spectra are provided for single component polystyrene particles and mixed polymer particles containing poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone), and polystyrene. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 999–1004, 1998     

Pressure–volume–temperature properties and free volume parameters of PEO/PMMA blends

Melt-miscible polymer blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/atactic poly(methyl methacrylate (PEO/a-PMMA)) were prepared by melt-mixing and characterized by pressure–volume–temperature (PVT) dilatometry in the pressure and temperature range of 0 to 200 MPa and 20 to 200°C, respectively. The PVT data were analyzed in terms of two equations of state (EOS). The empirical Tait EOS was applied in the glassy, semicrystalline, and equilibrium melt state, and the Simha-Somcynsky EOS theory was applied in the equilibrium melt and glassy state. The Simha-Somcynsky EOS theory contains a free volume function. The temperature, pressure, and composition dependence of the free volume fraction h calculated from the Simha-Somcynsky EOS theory was studied. As a function of blend composition we observe that the free volume fraction, thermal expansivity, and compressibility all deviate mainly positively from linearity while the specific volume deviates mainly negatively from linearity. These findings are reconciled with composition-dependent free volume parameters, the free volume and cell volume as well as with self- and cross-interaction parameters derived from the Simha-Somcynsky EOS theory as applied to polymer mixtures. Moreover, the pressure dependence of glass and melting transitions as well as crystallization kinetics have been investigated. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 1061–1080, 1998     

Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization of 2‐naphthyl acrylate with 2‐cyanoprop‐2‐yl 1‐dithionaphthalate as a chain‐transfer agent

The reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerizations of 2‐naphthyl acrylate (2NA) initiated by 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile were investigated with 2‐cyanoprop‐2‐yl 1‐dithionaphthalate (CPDN) as a RAFT agent at various temperatures in a benzene solution. The results of the polymerizations showed that 2NA could be polymerized in a controlled way by RAFT polymerization with CPDN as a RAFT agent; the polymerization rate was first‐order with respect to the monomer concentration, and the molecular weight increased linearly with the monomer conversion. The polydispersities of the polymer were relatively low up to high conversions in all cases. The chain‐extension reactions of poly(2‐naphthyl acrylate) (P2NA) with methyl methacrylate and styrene successfully yielded poly(2‐naphthyl acrylate)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(2‐naphthyl acrylate)‐b‐polystyrene block polymers, respectively, with narrow polydispersities. The P2NA obtained by RAFT polymerization had a strong ultraviolet absorption at 270 nm, and the molecular weights had no apparent effect on the ultraviolet absorption intensities; however, the fluorescence intensity of P2NA increased as the molecular weight increased and was higher than that of 2NA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 2632–2642, 2005     

Characterization and degradation of the poly(methylphenylsiloxane)–poly(methyl methacrylate) graft copolymer

Poly(methylphenylsiloxane)–poly(methyl methacrylate) graft copolymers (PSXE-g-PMMA) were prepared by condensation reaction of poly(methylphenylsiloxane)-containing epoxy resin (PSXE) with carboxyl-terminated poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and they were characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC), infrared (IR), and ²⁹Si and ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The microstructure of the PSXE-g-PMMA graft copolymer was investigated by proton spin–spin relaxation T₂ measurements. The thermal stability and apparent activation energy for thermal degradation of these copolymers were studied by thermogravimetry and compared with unmodified PMMA. The incorporation of poly(methylphenylsiloxane) segments in graft copolymers improved thermal stability of PMMA and enhanced the activation energy for thermal degradation of PMMA. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 36: 2521–2530, 1998     

Heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers through click reaction

Heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers, (polystyrene)(poly(methyl methacrylate))‐ poly(tert‐butyl acrylate)‐(polystyrene)(poly(methyl methacrylate)), (PS)(PMMA)‐PtBA‐(PMMA)(PS), and, (PS)(PMMA)‐poly(ethylene glycol)(PEG)‐(PMMA)(PS), through click reaction strategy between PS‐PMMA copolymer (as side chains) with an alkyne functional group at the junction point and diazide end‐functionalized PtBA or PEG (as a main chain). PS‐PMMA with alkyne functional group was prepared by sequential living radical polymerizations such as the nitroxide mediated (NMP) and the metal mediated‐living radical polymerization (ATRP) routes. The obtained H‐shaped polymers were characterized by using ¹H‐NMR, GPC, DSC, and AFM measurements. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 1055–1065, 2007     

N‐Bromosuccinimide as a thermal iniferter for radical polymerization

N‐Bromosuccinimide (NBS) was used as a thermal iniferter for the initiation of the bulk polymerizations of methyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, and styrene. The polymerizations showed the characteristics of a living polymerization: both the yields and the molecular weights of the resultant polymers increased linearly as the reaction time increased. The molecular weight distributions of the polymers were 1.42–1.95 under the studied conditions. The resultant polymers could be used as macroiniferters to reinitiate the polymerization of the second monomer. The copolymers poly(methyl methacrylate)‐b‐polystyrene and polystyrene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) were obtained and characterized. End‐group analysis of the resultant poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(methyl acrylate), and polystyrene confirmed that NBS behaved as a thermal iniferter. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 2567–2573, 2005     

α‐Cyanobenzyl dithioester reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer agents for controlled radical polymerizations

A series of new reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agents with cyanobenzyl R groups were synthesized. In comparison with other dithioester RAFT agents, these new RAFT agents were odorless or low‐odor, and this made them much easier to handle. The kinetics of methyl methacrylate radical polymerizations mediated by these RAFT agents were investigated. The polymerizations proceeded in a controlled way, the first‐order kinetics evolved in a linear fashion with time, the molecular weights increased linearly with the conversions, and the polydispersities were very narrow (～1.1). A poly[(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene] block copolymer was prepared (number‐average molecular weight = 42,600, polydispersity index = 1.21) from a poly(methyl methacrylate) macro‐RAFT agent. These new RAFT agents also showed excellent control over the radical polymerization of styrenics and acrylates. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 1535–1543, 2005     

Stress–strain behavior of low‐density polyethylene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends with modulated interfaces with a hydrogenated polybutadiene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymer

The stress–strain diagrams and ultimate tensile properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized hydrogenated polybutadiene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (HPB‐b‐PMMA) blends with 20 wt % poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) droplets dispersed in a low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) matrix were studied. The HPB‐b‐PMMA pure diblock copolymer was prepared via controlled living anionic polymerization. Four copolymers, in terms of the molecular weights of the hydrogenated polybutadiene (HPB) and PMMA sequences (22,000–12,000, 63,300–31,700, 49,500–53,500, and 27,700–67,800), were used. We demonstrated with the stress–strain diagrams, in combination with scanning electron microscopy observations of deformed specimens, that the interfacial adhesion had a predominant role in determining the mechanism and extent of blend deformation. The debonding of PMMA particles from the LDPE matrix was clearly observed in the compatibilized blends in which the copolymer was not efficiently located at the interface. The best HPB‐b‐PMMA copolymer, resulting in the maximum improvement of the tensile properties of the compatibilized blend, had a PMMA sequence that was approximately half that of the HPB block. Because of the much higher interactions encountered in the PMMA phase in comparison with those in HPB (LDPE), a shorter sequence of PMMA (with respect to HPB but longer than the critical molecular weight for entanglement) was sufficient to favor a quantitative location of the copolymer at the LDPE/PMMA interface. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 22–34, 2005     

Glass‐formation kinetics of miscible blends of atactic polystyrene and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

We present a detailed investigation of the kinetics associated with the glass transitions of miscible blends composed of atactic polystyrene (a‐PS) and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO). According to both dynamic mechanical analysis and differential scanning calorimetry, relaxation times displayed an enhanced temperature dependence (i.e., more fragile or more cooperative behavior) for the blends compared with additive behavior based on the responses of neat a‐PS and PPO. This is consistent with the notion that specific interactions between the blend components heighten the intermolecular cooperativity. The compositional dependence of fragility provided insight into physical aging results for the properties of volume and enthalpy. The combination of our research and a previously reported pressure–volume–temperature study by Zoller and Hoehn (J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 1982, 20, 1385) provided evidence that the observation of increased glassy densities for the blends compared with those of the pure polymers was kinetic in origin and was not a feature of the thermodynamics of miscibility. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 2118–2129, 2001     

Heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers through the combination of the Diels–Alder reaction and controlled/living radical polymerization techniques

Heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers (PS)(PtBA)–PEO–(PtBA)(PS) and (PS)(PtBA)–PPO–(PtBA)(PS) [where PS is polystyrene, PtBA is poly(tert‐butyl acrylate), PEO is poly(ethylene oxide), and PPO is poly(propylene oxide)], containing PEO or PPO as a backbone and PS and PtBA as side arms, were prepared via the combination of the Diels–Alder reaction and atom transfer radical and nitroxide‐mediated radical polymerization routes. Commercially available PEO or PPO containing bismaleimide end groups was reacted with a compound having an anthracene functionality, succinic acid anthracen‐9‐yl methyl ester 3‐(2‐bromo‐2‐methylpropionyloxy)‐2‐methyl‐2‐[2‐phenyl‐2‐(2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐yloxy)ethoxycarbonyl]propyl ester, with a Diels–Alder reaction strategy. The obtained macroinitiator with tertiary bromide and 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐oxy functional end groups was used subsequently in the atom transfer radical polymerization of tert‐butyl acrylate and in the nitroxide‐mediated free‐radical polymerization of styrene to produce heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers with moderately low molecular weight distributions (<1.31). The polymers were characterized with ¹H NMR, ultraviolet, gel permeation chromatography, and differential scanning calorimetry. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 3947–3957, 2006     

Preparation of 3‐arm star polymers (A3) via Diels–Alder click reaction

Diels–Alder click reaction was successfully applied for the preparation of 3‐arm star polymers (A₃) using furan protected maleimide end‐functionalized polymers and trianthracene functional linking agent (2) at reflux temperature of toluene for 48 h. Well‐defined furan protected maleimide end‐functionalized polymers, poly (ethylene glycol), poly(methyl methacrylate), and poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) were obtained by esterification or atom transfer radical polymerization. Obtained star polymers were characterized via NMR and GPC (refractive index and triple detector detection). Splitting of GPC traces of the resulting polymer mixture notably displayed that Diels–Alder click reaction was a versatile and a reliable route for the preparation of A₃ star polymer. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 302–313, 2008     

Calculation of polymer blend compositions from vibrational spectra: A simple method

In this work, the application of a new approach for quantitative analysis, originally developed for Raman spectroscopy, is extended to IR spectroscopy. The attractive features of this methodology are its simplicity and ease of use in comparison with traditional approaches. Unlike other methods, rich spectral information containing several overlapped peaks can be used in the calculations. A robust and well‐conditioned calculation scheme renders precise results, which are independent of the operator's decisions. The method was applied to study the chemical compositions of homogeneous polymer blends made of polystyrene and poly(vinyl methyl ether). Raman and IR blend spectra were acquired with confocal Raman microspectroscopy and attenuated total reflection/Fourier transform infrared, respectively. The blend compositions were calculated from the corresponding vibrational spectra with the proposed strategy, and excellent agreement between those values and the true ones was found for both techniques. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 1144–1151, 2005     

Dispersion polymerization of styrene in carbon dioxide stabilized by copolymers of poly(propylene glycol) methacrylate and 2‐(perfluorooctyl)ethyl methacrylate

The dispersion polymerization of styrene in carbon dioxide with a series of copolymers of poly(propylene glycol) methacrylate (PPGMA) and 2‐(perfluorooctyl)ethyl methacrylate (FOEMA) as the polymerization dispersants was examined. It was demonstrated that PPGMA and FOEMA copolymers and polymers containing 52–100% FOEMA could be used as effective dispersants for the polymerization, and the composition of the copolymeric dispersant had a dramatic effect on both the polymerization yield and the morphology of the resulting polystyrene. The effects of the concentrations of the copolymeric dispersants, the concentrations of the monomer, and the reaction pressure were also investigated. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 3804–3815, 2003     

Synthesis and characterization of ABA‐type amphiphilic tri‐block copolymers through anionic polymerization using end functionalized poly(ethylene oxide) oligomers

ABA‐type amphiphilic tri‐block copolymers were successfully synthesized from poly(ethylene oxide) derivatives through anionic polymerization. When poly(styrene) anions were reacted with telechelic bromine‐terminated poly(ethylene oxide) ( 1 ) in 2:1 mole ratio, poly(styrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(styrene) tri‐block copolymers were formed. Similarly, stable telechelic carbanion‐terminated poly(ethylene oxide), prepared from 1,1‐diphenylethylene‐terminated poly (ethylene oxide) ( 2 ) and sec‐BuLi, was also used to polymerize styrene and methyl methacrylate separately, as a result, poly (styrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(styrene) and poly (methyl methacrylate)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) tri‐block copolymers were formed respectively. All these tri‐block copolymers and poly(ethylene oxide) derivatives, 1 and 2 , were characterized by spectroscopic, calorimetric, and chromatographic techniques. Theoretical molecular weights of the tri‐block copolymers were found to be similar to the experimental molecular weights, and narrow polydispersity index was observed for all the tri‐block copolymers. Differential scanning calorimetric studies confirmed the presence of glass transition temperatures of poly(ethylene oxide), poly(styrene), and poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks in the tri‐block copolymers. Poly(styrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(styrene) tri‐block copolymers, prepared from polystyryl anion and 1 , were successfully used to prepare micelles, and according to the transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering results, the micelles were spherical in shape with mean average diameter of 106 ± 5 nm. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Synthesis of polyisoprene–poly(methyl methacrylate) block copolymers via a two‐electron‐transfer mechanism

Supramolecular complexes of alkali metals were used as catalysts in the polymerization of isoprene via a two‐electron‐transfer mechanism. The obtained polyisoprene, having a living end group, was subsequently used to initiate methyl methacrylate polymerization in tetrahydrofuran. Polyisoprene–poly(methyl methacrylate) block copolymers were obtained, and their structure was established with ¹H NMR, gel permeation chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, and experiments of selective extraction. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 1086–1092, 2006