Analysis of aqueous pyrethroid residuals by one-step microwave-assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection

A one-step microwave-assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction (MA-HS-SPME) has been applied to be a pretreatment step in the analysis of aqueous pyrethroid residuals by gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD). Microwave heating was applied to accelerate the vaporization of pyrethroids (bioallenthrin, bifenthrin, fenpropathrin, cyhalothrin, permethrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, fluvalinate, fenvalerate and deltamethrin) into the headspace, and then being absorbed directly on a SPME fiber under the controlled conditions. Optimal conditions for the SPME sampling, such as the selection of sampling fiber, sample pH, sampling temperature and time, microwave irradiation power, desorption temperature and time were investigated and then applied to real sample analysis. Experimental results indicated that the extraction of pyrethroids from a 20-mL aquatic sample (pH 4.0) was achieved with the best efficiency through the use of a 100-μm PDMS fiber, microwave irradiation of 157 W and sampling at 30 °C for 10 min. Under optimum conditions, the detections were linear in the range of 0.05-0.5 μg/L with the square of correlation coefficients (R²) of >0.9913 for pyrethroids except bifenthrin being 0.9812. Method detection limits (MDL) were found to be varied from 0.2 to 2.6 ng/L for different pyrethroids based on S/N (signal to noise) = 3. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for repeatability were 7-21%. A field underground water sample was analyzed with recovery between 88.5% to 115.5%. This method was proven to be a very simple, rapid, and solvent-free process to achieve the sample pretreatment before the analysis of trace pyrethroids in aqueous samples by gas chromatography.     

Trace analysis of chlorobenzenes in water samples using headspace solvent microextraction and gas chromatography/electron capture detection

In the present work, a rapid method for the extraction and determination of chlorobenzenes (CBs) such as monochlorobenzene, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene in water samples using the headspace solvent microextraction (HSME) and gas chromatography/electron capture detector (ECD) has been described. A microdrop of the dodecane containing monobromobenzene (internal standard) was used as extracting solvent in this investigation. The analytes were extracted by suspending a 2.5 μl extraction drop directly from the tip of a microsyringe fixed above an extraction vial with a septum in a way that the needle passed through the septum and the needle tip appeared above the surface of the solution. After the extraction was finished, the drop was retracted back into the needle and injected directly into a GC column. Optimization of experimental conditions such as nature of the extracting solvent, microdrop and sample temperatures, stirring rate, microdrop and sample volumes, the ionic strength and extraction time were investigated. The optimized conditions were as follows: dodecane as the extracting solvent, the extraction temperature, 45 °C; the sodium chloride concentration, 2 M; the extraction time, 5.0 min; the stirring rate, 500 rpm; the drop volume, 2.5 μl; the sample volume, 7 ml; the microsyringe needle temperature, 0.0 °C. The limit of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.1 μg/l (for 1,3-dichlorobenzene) to 3.0 μg/l (for 1,4-dichlorobenzene) and linear range of 0.5–3.0 μg/l for 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichlorobenzene and from 5.0 to 20.0 μg/l for monochlorobenzene and from 5.0 to 30 μg/l for 1,4-dichlorobenzene. The relative standard deviations (R.S.D.) for most of CBs at the 5 μg/l level were below 10%. The optimized procedure was successfully applied to the extraction and determination of CBs in different water samples.     

On-line determination of organochlorine pesticides in water by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection

This paper describes the extraction of 20 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from water samples using solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Three fused-silica fibers coated or bonded with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) of different film thicknesses (20-, 30-, and 100-μm) were evaluated. The extraction time, the effects of stirring and addition of NaCl to the aqueous sample, the linear range and the precision of this technique, and the effect of carryover were examined for 20 analytes and are presented here. A comparison with results using conventional liquid-liquid extraction demonstrate that the SPME technique is well suited as a fast screening technique for OCPs in water samples.     

Determination of fungicides in water using liquid phase microextraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection

A hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and gas chromatographic-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) method for the determination of six fungicides (chlorothalonil, hexaconazole, penconazole, procymidone, tetraconazole, and vinclozolin) in 3 ml of water was described. The method used 3 μl of toluene as extraction solvent, 20 min extraction time with pH 4, stirring at 870 rpm, and no salt addition. The enrichment factors of this method were from 135 to 213. Limits of detection were in the range of 0.004-0.025 μg/l. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) at 0.1 and 5 μg/l of spiking levels were in the range 3-8%. Recoveries of six fungicides from farm water at a spiking level of 0.5 μg/l were between 90.7 and 97.6%. The method compared favorably with the traditional method in terms of the sample size, analysis time, and cost.     

Analysis of hexachlorocyclohexanes in aquatic samples by one-step microwave-assisted headspace controlled-temperature liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with electron capture detection

A microwave-assisted headspace controlled-temperature liquid-phase microextraction (HS-CT-LPME) technique was applied for the one-step sample extraction of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) from aqueous samples with complicate matrices, followed by gas chromatographic (GC) analysis with electron capture detector (ECD). Microwave heating was applied to accelerate the evaporation of HCHs into the headspace and an external-cooling system was used to control the temperature in the sampling zone for HS-LPME. Parameters affecting extraction efficiency, such as LPME solvent, sampling position and temperature, microwave power and irradiation time (the same as sampling time), sample pH, and salt addition were thoroughly investigated. From experimental results, the following conditions were selected for the extraction of HCHs from 10-mL water sample (pH 2.0) by using 1-octanol as the LPME solvent, with sampling done at 38 °C for 6 min under 167 W of microwave irradiation. The detections were linear in the concentration of 0.1–10 μg/L for α-HCH and γ-HCH, and 1–100 μg/L for β-HCH and δ-HCH. Detection limits were 0.05, 0.4, 0.03 and 0.1 μg/L for α-, β-, γ- and δ-HCH, respectively. Environmental water samples were analyzed with recovery between 86.4% and 102.4% for farm-field water, and between 92.2% and 98.6% for river water. The proposed method proved to serve as a simple, rapid, sensitive, inexpensive, and eco-friendly procedure for the determination of HCHs in aqueous samples.     

Analysis of total propionic acid in feed using headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography

A method is described to analyze total propionic acid content (free propionic acid + sodium, ammonium, calcium salts, etc.) in feed, using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) of a feed suspension in salted and acidified water. Optimization of the extraction variables was done by simplex method after choosing a polyacrilate fiber to enhance the response of this acid. Separation was made by capillary gas chromatography (GC), using a special free fatty acid phase (FFAP) column for acids and a flame ionization detector (FID). Some of the chromatograms were also done, injecting the SPME fiber in a GC-mass spectrometry (MS) system, working with some specific ions for propionic acid, to be selective enough to avoid confusing the propionic acid peak with interferences of those complex matrixes. The method was tested for linearity and repeatability. Detection and quantification limits were also calculated. The method was applied to commercial feed samples, very variable in composition, quantifying by standard addition method. No major interferences were observed.     

Fast and sensitive method to determine chloroanisoles in cork using an internally cooled solid-phase microextraction fiber

A new generation of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber, an internally cooled fiber (cold fiber with polydimethylsiloxane loading) that allows heating the sample matrix and simultaneously cooling the fiber coating, was used to determine 2,4-dichloroanisole, 2,6-dichloroanisole, 2,4,6-trichloroanisole and pentachloroanisole in cork. A comparison between the cold fiber and regular SPME fiber was performed. An automated headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) using commercial fibers and an internally cooled SPME fiber (CF-HS-SPME) coupled to gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS) was used. The extraction conditions for both CF-HS-SPME and HS-SPME were optimized using full factorial design and Doehlert matrix. The best extraction conditions for CF-HS-SPME were obtained using 10 min of incubation time, 10 min of extraction time, and sample and fiber temperature of 130 and 10 degrees C, respectively. For HS-SPME, polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber was used with 10 min of incubation time, 75 min of extraction time, 85 degrees C of sample temperature, 8 ml of water was added and agitated at 500 rpm. The quantification limits for the target compounds using CF-HS-SPME procedure were between 0.8 and 1.6 ng g(-1) of cork, while for HS-SPME were between 4 and 6 ng g(-1) of cork. Furthermore, the CF-HS-SPME procedure could be used as a non-destructive method after minor modification of the agitator for the autosampler.     

Simple determination of 22 organophosphorous pesticides in human blood using headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection

A simple and rapid procedure for the determination of 22 organophosphorous pesticides (bromophos-ethyl, bromophos-methyl, chlorfenvinphos, chlorpyriphos, demethon-S-methylsulfon, diazinon, dichlorvos, dicrotophos, dimethoate, disulfoton, edifenphos, fenitrothion, fenthion, malathion, methidathion, mevinphos, monocrotophos, omethoate, parathion-ethyl, parathion-methyl, phosphamidon, and quinalphos) in human blood using headspace (HS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry (MS) is presented. The effects of various sample additions, incubation temperatures, absorption times, desorption times, and depths of fiber insertion into the injection port of the GC are optimized to enhance the sensitivity of the procedure. The recoveries of spiked blood samples are determined between 70% and 95% compared with samples prepared in water, and absolute recoveries are in the range between 0.1% and 19.6%. For quantitation in the single ion monitoring mode, linearity is established over concentration ranges from 0.025 to 5.0 microg/g with excellent coefficients of correlation (0.991-0.998). The detection limits are in the range between 0.01 and 0.3 microg/g. The time for analysis is 44 min per sample including extraction and GC-MS analysis. HS-SPME in combination with GC-MS is an effective method for the determination of organophosphorous pesticides in human blood and shows a great potential for use in rapid on-site analytical work, which is highly demanded in clinical and forensic toxicology.     

Determination of fluoride in toothpaste using headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-flame ionization detection

A new method for determination of fluoride in toothpaste employing the headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by gas chromatography/flame ionization detection (GC/FID) has been proposed. It is a development of the method for determination of fluoride using trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) as the derivatization reagent to form trimethylfluorosilane (TMFS), with the liquid/liquid extraction (LLE) step replaced by HS-SPME. To introduce the latter, it was necessary to determine the conditions of the reaction and to optimize the two stages of the SPME procedure: extraction and desorption. The parameters of the SPME analysis using carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) fiber were defined and compared with the corresponding ones for the LLE method, used as a reference. Also, these two methods were compared with respect to their linearity, precision, and accuracy. Results from toothpaste analyses using these two methods were highly correlated, indicating the potential to use the SPME extraction as an inexpensive and solventfree alternative to the LLE method.     

Robustness test of a headspace solid-phase microextraction method for the determination of chloroanisoles and chlorophenols related to cork taint in wine using experimental design

A robustness test of a solid-phase microextraction-based method optimised for the simultaneous determination of chloroanisoles and acetyl-chlorophenols implicated in the presence of corky taste in wine has been carried out using a hybrid experimental design. The influence of small changes around the nominal level of four factors (Vs/Vt ratio, extraction temperature, exposure time and sample incubation time) on the measured response were evaluated in order to indicate if the method is robust for the experimental range considered. Moreover, it was also necessary to identify the critical parameters in the validated model in order to keep them under strict control. Experimental design provides an effective approach for robustness testing as a part of the analytical method validation.     

Nitro musks in cosmetic products—determination by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with atomic-emission detection

Summary The combination of headspace solid-phase microextraction with atomic-emission detection enables highly selective and sensitive determination of itro musk compounds in cosmetic products. Sample preparation is considerably simplified; there is no solvent extraction step. Enrichment is influenced by the type and amount of cosmetic product investigated. The lowest amount giving well detectable peaks is 1 mg musk compound per kg sample. Calibration curves obtained from spiked solutions of selected reference cosmetics in water show very good linearity. Relative standard deviations of peak areas from repeated measurements are usually <10%. Presented at the 21^st ISC held in Stuttgart, Germany, 15^th–20^th September, 1996     

Determination of organochlorine pesticides in water using microwave assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography

A coupled technique, microwave-assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction (MA-HS-SPME), was investigated for one-step in situ sample pretreatment for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) prior to gas chromatographic determination. The OCPs, aldrin, o,p'-DDE, p,p'-DDE, o,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDT, dieldrin, alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate, endrin, delta-HCH, gamma-HCH, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, methoxychlor and trifluralin were collected by the proposed method and analyzed by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection (GC-ECD). To perform the MA-HS-SPME, six types of SPME fibers were examined and compared. The parameters affecting the efficiency in MA-HS-SPME process such as sampling time and temperature, microwave irradiation power, desorption temperature and time were studied to obtain the optimal conditions. The method was developed using spiked water samples such as field water and with 0.05% humic acid in a concentration range of 0.05-2.5 microg/l except endosulfan sulfate in 0.25-2.5 microg/l. The detection was linear over the studied concentration range with r2>0.9978. The detection limits varied from 0.002 to 0.070 microg/l based on S/N=3 and the relative standard deviations for repeatability were <15%. A certified reference sample of OCPs in aqueous solution was analyzed by the proposed method and compared with the conventional liquid-liquid extraction procedure. These results are in good agreement. The results indicate that the proposed method provides a very simple, fast, and solvent-free procedure to achieve sample pretreatment prior to the trace-level screening determination of organochloride pesticides by gas chromatography.     

Analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds in aqueous samples by microwave-assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-electron capture detection

The pretreatment technique of microwave-assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction (MA-HS-SPME) has been developed and studied for the extraction of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in aqueous samples prior to chromatographic analysis. The optimum conditions for obtaining extraction efficiency, such as the extraction time, extraction temperature, addition of salts, and the ratio of sample to headspace volume parameters were investigated. Experimental results indicated that the proposed MA-HS-SPME technique attained the best extraction efficiency under the optimized conditions, i.e., irradiation of extraction solution (20mL aqueous sample in 40mL headspace vial with no addition of salt) under 30W microwave power for 30min at 70 degrees C. The detection was linear at 1-250ng/L with correlation coefficient exceeding 0.997. The detection limits obtained were between 0.2-10.7ng/L, repeatability range from 2 to 15%. Real water samples collected from known sites in southern Taiwan were analyzed using the optimized conditions.     

Determination of ethylphenol compounds in wine by headspace solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with gas chromatography and flame ionization detection

Headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was investigated as a solvent-free alternative method for the extraction and determination of 4-ethylphenol (EP) and 4-ethylguaiacol (EG) in red wine by capillary gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (FID) and compared to liquid-liquid extraction.For HS-SPME, better results were obtained with saturated sodium chloride samples, at 55 °C, using a 85 μm polyacrylate fiber. An absorption time of 40 min was needed to reach the absorption equilibrium for EG. This 40-min duration corresponds to the beginning of EP equilibrium and was selected for the experiments. In these conditions, the calibration graphs were linear in the range 5-5000 μg l⁻¹ and the sensitivity was nearly the same for the two compounds. The detection limits were in the low μg l⁻¹ range. In model wine solutions, result obtained with the liquid-liquid extraction method exhibit a linear calibration between 25 and 10,000 μg l⁻¹ with a detection limit of 1 μg l⁻¹, but, the relative standard deviations of the EP and EG result in the low concentration range (<50 μg l⁻¹) are higher than those obtained by HS-SPME (15% compared to 2% for EP and 12% compared to 5% for EG). Taking into account the numerous volatile compounds in wine, HS-SPME is a rapid and valid alternative technique for use in the determination of ethylphenols at trace levels.     

Determination of major compounds in sweet wines by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography

Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was studied by high resolution gas chromatographic analysis of major compounds (ethyl acetate, methanol, 1-butanol, 2-butanol, 1-propanol, isobutanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol) in sweet wines. Five different SPME fibres were tested and the influence of different factors such as temperature and time of desorption, extraction time, stirring, sample and vial volume, sugar and ethanol content were studied and optimized using model solutions. The SPME method was validated with the direct injection method. The proposed HS-SPME-GC method is an appropriate technique for the quantitative analysis of the mentioned analytes in real sweet wines.     

Optimization of headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-atomic emission detection analysis of monomethylmercury

Optimum conditions for headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) in the analysis of monomethylmercury (MeHg) have been determined. Sodium tetra(n-)propylborate (NaBPr(4)) is used as derivatization reagent to promote volatility. A simple aluminium bar was used to cool the SPME fiber to about 2 degrees C during the equilibration phase just before extraction. HS-SPME was performed using different fibers. The 100 microm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and 65 microm polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB) fibers showed the best results. Although the extraction efficiency for MeHg derivative of the polydimethylsiloxane-Carboxen (PDMS-CAR) fiber is similar to the other fibers, desorption of MeHg derivative from a PDMS-CAR fiber is poor. Factors affecting the HS-SPME process such as adsorption and desorption times, ionic strength (salting-out) and extraction temperature have been evaluated and optimized thoroughly. The highest extraction efficiency for the PDMS fiber was obtained by extraction at a low temperature (2 degrees C) immediately after equilibration at 30 degrees C. With the PDMS-DVB and PDMS-CAR fiber improvement of extraction efficiency at lower temperatures is negligible. Repeated extraction out of the same vial revealed that about 30% of MeHg derivative is extracted from the headspace with a PDMS fiber at 2 degrees C and about 70% with a PDMS-DVB fiber. Repeated extraction with two different fiber coatings showed that the PDMS-CAR fiber also extracts about 70% but that the desorption is incomplete. Attempts to improve the desorption failed due to degradation of the MeHg derivate at high injection temperatures. The limit of detection (3sigma) was 16 pg/L MeHg. The relative standard deviation (n = 8) for 100 pg/L of MeHg was found to be 5%. Linearity of the HS-SPME-GC-atomic emission detection method was established over at least two orders of magnitude in the range 0-2000 pg/L. Recovery of a surface water sample spiked at 2 ng/L was 85%. The suitability of the procedure was demonstrated by analysis of a surface water sample that showed a concentration of 100 pg/L MeHg. The optimized method can be used with standard commercial equipment without further adaptations.     

Impurity analysis of 1,4-dioxane in nonionic surfactants and cosmetics using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

1,4-Dioxane impurity in nonionic surfactants and cosmetics were analyzed using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Experimental results show that there is no significant difference using SPME-GC and SPME-GC-MS for analysis of 1,4-dioxane in three types of nonionic surfactants at the 95% confidence level. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) values of each analytical method were smaller than 3%. The amount of 1,4-dioxane was found to vary from 11.6 +/- 0.3 ppm to 73.5 +/- 0.5 ppm in 30% of nonionic surfactants from manufacturers in Taiwan. These methods were linear over the studied range of 3-150 ppm with correlation coefficients higher than 0.995. The recoveries of 1,4-dioxane for these nonionic surfactants following SPME were all higher than 96 +/- 1% (n = 3). The detection limits of 1,4-dioxane for these nonionic surfactants following SPME were from 0.06 ppm to 0.51 ppm. The experimentally determined level of 1,4-dioxane in cosmetics from manufacturers in Taiwan varied from 4.2 +/- 0.1 ppm to 41.1 +/- 0.6 ppm in 22% of daily used cosmetics following SPME coupled with GC and GC-MS. Conventional solvent extraction takes around 1 h for extraction and reconcentration but SPME takes only around 10 min. SPME provides better analyses of 1,4-dioxane in nonionic surfactants and cosmetics than conventional solvent extraction and head space pretreatments in term of simplicity, speed, precision, detection limit, and solvent consumption.     

Determination of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in water samples by static headspace gas chromatography with electron capture detection

A simple, efficient, solvent‐free, and commercial readily available approach for determination of five volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in water samples using the static headspace sampling and gas chromatography with electron capture detection has been described. The proposed static headspace sampling method was initially optimized and the optimum experimental conditions found were 10 mL water sample containing 20% w/v sodium chloride placed in a 20 mL vial and stirred at 50ºC for 20 min. The linearity of the method was in the range of 1.2–240 μg/L for dichloromethane, 0.2–40 μg/L for trichloromethane, 0.005–1 μg/L for perchloromethane, 0.025–5 μg/L for trichloroethylene, and 0.01–2 μg/L for perchloroethylene, with coefficients of determination ranging between 0.9979 and 0.9990. The limits of detection were in the low μg/L level, ranging between 0.001 and 0.3 μg/L. The relative recoveries of spiked five volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons with external calibration method at different concentration levels in pure, tap, sea water of Jiaojiang Estuary, and sea water of waters of Xiaomendao were in the range of 91–116, 96–105, 86–112, and 80–111%, respectively, and with relative standard deviations of 1.9–3.6, 2.3–3.5, 1.5–2.7, and 2.3–3.7% (n = 5), respectively. The performance of the proposed method was compared with traditional liquid–liquid extraction on the real water samples (i.e., pure, tap, and sea water, etc.) and comparable efficiencies were obtained. It is concluded that this method can be successfully applied for the determination of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in different water samples.