天然黄酮物质提取技术和分析方法的研究进展

综述了黄酮类化合物的提取技术及分析方法.新型提取技术如微波萃取法、超声波法、超临界萃取法、酶法、半仿生提取法;分析方法有分光光度法、高效液相色谱法、高效毛细管电泳法、薄层色谱法等.旨在为黄酮类化合物的研究、开发、应用提供参考.     

中草药中槲皮素的毛细管电泳法测定

近年来,毛细管电泳法用于中药的分析正在逐渐展开．微波辅助萃取是微波与传统的溶剂萃取法相结合后形成的一种新的萃取方法,目前已被用于环境、食品和天然产物的提取等领域,我们也曾用微波萃取法研究了中药刺五加和黄芩中的黄酮类化合物。     

大豆异黄酮和大豆皂甙的分离纯化研究

黄酮类化合物的分离精制常用溶剂沉淀、pH梯度萃取法和柱色谱法.其中,溶剂萃取法虽然成本较低,但工艺过程繁琐,得率低且产品纯度不高.PH梯度萃取法所获得高纯度的黄酮化合物单体,可满足结构鉴定.柱色谱法是精制黄酮类化合物最常用的方法之一,Naim等曾用氧化铝柱从大豆提取物中成功分离了在C5位有羟基和在C5位没有羟基的两大类异黄酮组分,利用聚酰胺柱进一步从不含C5位羟基的异黄酮组分中分离出两种异黄酮单体.     

加速溶剂萃取法快速提取黄连中的生物碱

探讨了快速溶剂萃取法（ASE）提取黄连中生物碱的可行性,并比较了该方法与回流提取法和超声提取法的优越性。以黄连中盐酸小檗碱的提取率为指标,以高效液相色谱法（HPLC）为检测方法,用正交实验对快速溶剂萃取法从黄连中提取盐酸小檗碱的工作条件进行优化。最佳仪器参数：提取溶剂为80%乙醇＋0.5%HCl,提取温度为130℃,静态提取时间为10 min,提取次数为1次。快速溶剂萃取法可作为黄连中生物碱分析测定的前处理方法。     

烟草中有机氯类农药多残留分析前处理方法对比研究

以烟草中有机氯类农药为研究对象,从检出限、回收率、重复性和色谱图4个方面系统比较了机械振荡萃取法、超声波溶剂萃取法、微波辅助萃取法和加速溶剂萃取法4种常用前处理方法。由于加速溶剂萃取法是在高温高压下进行萃取,在提取出残留农药的同时,也提取出更多的干扰物。机械振荡法、超声波溶剂萃取法和微波辅助萃取法各项结果差别较小,其中机械振荡萃取法回收率和重复性最好,但提取时间较长。考虑溶剂消耗和提取时间等方面的因素,微波辅助萃取是较理想的样品前处理方法。     

在线提取-高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测-四极杆飞行时间质谱法快速鉴定陈皮中黄酮类化合物

建立了简便、高效的在线提取-高效液相色谱-二极管阵列-四极杆飞行时间质谱法（OLE-HPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS）快速提取和分离鉴定陈皮中黄酮类化合物。在线提取体系中,将填有陈皮粉末样品（2.0 mg）的固相萃取小柱取代样品环连接在手动进样阀上,样品直接被流动相提取并进入HPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS系统分析,无需额外的样品前处理步骤。与传统的溶剂回流提取法相比,在线提取法具有较高的提取率。通过分析化合物的紫外谱图、色谱保留时间和质谱信息,共鉴定出24种黄酮类化合物,其中新圣草次苷、柠檬黄素-3-O-（3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酸）-葡萄糖苷及其异构体首次在陈皮中报道。建立的方法为中药复杂体系中活性成分的快速分离鉴定提供了新的研究思路。     

刺五加中黄酮类化合物的微波辅助提取研究

利用微波辅助提取法(MAE)提取刺五加中的黄酮类化合物,通过正交实验,考察了微波提取条件(包括溶剂、微波辐射时间、提取压力和料液比)对刺五加中总黄酮提取率的影响,结果表明：溶剂为50％乙醇,提取压力为700kPa,提取时间为10min,料液比为1：20时,提取率最佳。与索氏提取法相比较,提取率可提高40％。     

加速溶剂萃取技术提取桑叶中芦丁和槲皮素的工艺研究

桑叶,又名"铁扇子",芦丁和槲皮素均为桑叶的主要有效成分,具有疏散风热、消肺润燥、清肝明目的功效~([1]).现代药理研究证明,桑叶中功效成分具有降血压、抑制血糖上升等药理作用~([2]).目前,对桑叶中黄酮类化合物的提取方面已有报道~([3～5]),但大多提取时间较长、所需试剂量大.加速溶剂萃取技术是使用常规的溶剂、利用总加温度和提高压力提高萃取效率,大大缩短提取的时间并明显降低萃取溶剂的使用量.本实验探讨了加速溶剂萃取技术提取桑叶中黄酮类化合物的萃取条件,并采用HPLC梯度淋洗法测定了芦丁和槲皮素,方法快捷准确,重现性好,可以满足桑叶中黄酮类物质的测定.     

枇杷叶中活性物质提取方法研究进展

综述枇杷叶中活性物质提取方法。枇杷叶中常见活性物质主要有黄酮类、多糖类、三萜酸以及苷类化合物等。提取方法有微波辅助提取法、超声波辅助酶法、水提醇沉提取法以及超临界二氧化碳萃取法等。微波辅助提取法提取效率高,选择性好,可用于热不稳定物质。超声波辅助酶法节约萃取时间,低毒环保,提高酶解得率。水提醇沉提取法应用范围广,操作简单,成本低。超临界二氧化碳萃取法可用于热稳定性较差的物质,灵敏度高,相对成本高。这些方法在药用植物提取中得到了广泛的应用。在保证较好的选择性和重复性前提下,使用绿色、环保、经济的溶剂减少环境污染,提高活性物质提取得率是现代提取方法的发展方向。     

离子液体-非极性溶剂微波提取法在人参化学成分研究中的应用

以离子液体作为微波吸收介质建立了离子液体-非极性溶剂微波提取法,对人参中的化学成分进行了提取,并将该法与固体微波吸收介质-非极性溶剂微波提取法、极性溶剂微波提取法以及混合溶剂微波提取法进行了对比.结果表明,极性溶剂提取的主要化学成分为极性化合物,而固体微波吸收介质-非极性溶剂微波提取法与离子液体-非极性溶剂微波提取法相比,提取所得的化学成分并无明显差别,说明离子液体是一种较好的微波吸收介质和能量传递材料.所建立的方法具有提取时间短、操作简单及绿色环保等优点,且对后期分析无明显影响,是快速提取化学成分的理想方法.     

Optimization and comparison of MAE, ASE and Soxhlet extraction for the determination of HCH isomers in soil samples

The microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and Soxhlet extraction of two isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha-HCH and gamma-HCH, from a polluted landfill soil have been optimized following different experimental designs. In the case of microwave-assisted extraction, the following variables were considered: pressure, extraction time, microwave power, percentage of acetone in n-hexane mixture and solvent volume. When ASE extraction was studied the variables were pressure, temperature and extraction time. Finally, the percentage of acetone in n-hexane mixture and the extraction time were the only variables studied for Soxhlet extraction. The concentrations obtained by the three extraction techniques were, within their experimental uncertainties, in good agreement. This fact assures the possibility of using both ASE and MAE techniques in the routine determination of lindane in polluted soils and sediments.     

Comparison of extraction techniques and modeling of accelerated solvent extraction for the authentication of natural vanilla flavors

Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) of vanilla beans has been optimized using ethanol as a solvent. A theoretical model is proposed to account for this multistep extraction. This allows the determination, for the first time, of the total amount of analytes initially present in the beans and thus the calculation of recoveries using ASE or any other extraction technique. As a result, ASE and Soxhlet extractions have been determined to be efficient methods, whereas recoveries are modest for maceration techniques and depend on the solvent used. Because industrial extracts are obtained by many different procedures, including maceration in various solvents, authenticating vanilla extracts using quantitative ratios between the amounts of vanilla flavor constituents appears to be unreliable. When authentication techniques based on isotopic ratios are used, ASE is a valid sample preparation technique because it does not induce isotopic fractionation.     

加速溶剂萃取用于有机氯杀虫剂残留分析

研究加速溶剂萃取对复杂的生物基质中有机氯农药的提取效率,并与索氏提取法进行比较,两种方法的提取效率相差不大。加速溶剂萃取是一种快速高效的样品提取方法。     

固相微萃取/加速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-质谱法分析青山绿水茶叶的挥发性成分

采用固相微萃取(SPME)和加速溶剂萃取(ASE)两种前处理方法从青山绿水茶叶(也叫苦丁茶)中提取挥发性成分,用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)定性。实验结果表明:两种前处理方法共检测出91种成分,SPME检出49种,ASE检出56种,共同组分14种。青山绿水茶叶的挥发性成分主要成分有β-月桂烯、3,3,5-三甲基-1,5-庚二烯、L-柠檬烯、α-罗勒烯、β-罗勒烯、β-蒎烯、2-甲基安息香醛和5-羟甲基糠醛等物质。这两种提取方法各具优势,共同应用可以起到取长补短的作用。     

Optimization and comparison of MAE, ASE and Soxhlet extraction for the determination of HCH isomers in soil samples

The microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and Soxhlet extraction of two isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane, α-HCH and γ-HCH, from a polluted landfill soil have been optimized following different experimental designs. In the case of microwave-assisted extraction, the following variables were considered: pressure, extraction time, microwave power, percentage of acetone in n-hexane mixture and solvent volume. When ASE extraction was studied the variables were pressure, temperature and extraction time. Finally, the percentage of acetone in n-hexane mixture and the extraction time were the only variables studied for Soxhlet extraction. The concentrations obtained by the three extraction techniques were, within their experimental uncertainties, in good agreement. This fact assures the possibility of using both ASE and MAE techniques in the routine determination of lindane in polluted soils and sediments. Received: 28 January 2000 / Revised: 28 March 2000 / Accepted: 31 March 2000     

加速溶剂萃取技术在中药有效成分分析中的应用

以两种药材为研究实例,对加速溶剂萃取法（ASE）在中药材有效成分提取研究中的应用进行了简要介绍。采用正交试验法考察了提取丹参中丹酚酸B的提取条件（萃取温度、静态萃取时间、萃取溶剂以及料液比）,确定了较好的实验条件。比较了ASE、水蒸气蒸馏法、超声波提取法及索氏提取法对木香挥发油的提取效果,结果表明ASE对木香挥发油的提取效果最好。     

A comparison of accelerated solvent extraction,Soxhlet extraction,and ultrasonic-assisted extraction for analysis of terpenoids and sterols in tobacco

The performance of accelerated solvent extraction in the analysis of terpenoids and sterols in tobacco samples was investigated and compared with those of Soxhlet extraction and ultrasonically assisted extraction with respect to yield, extraction time, reproducibility and solvent consumption. The results indicate that although the highest yield was achieved by Soxhlet extraction, ASE appears to be a promising alternative to classical methods since it is faster and uses less solvent, especially when applied to the investigation of large batch tobacco samples. However, Soxhlet extraction is still the preferred method for analyzing sterols since it gives a higher extraction efficiency than other methods.     

Comparison of different extraction techniques for the determination of chlorinated pesticides in animal feed

The performances of Soxhlet extraction, dive-in Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), fluidized-bed extraction (FBE), and ultrasonic extraction (UE) for the analysis of organochlorine pesticides in animal feed have been investigated. ASE and MAE provided significantly better extraction efficiency than Soxhlet extraction. The concentrations were 126.7 and 114.8%, respectively, of the values obtained by classical Soxhlet extraction, whereas the results from FBE and dive-in Soxhlet were comparable with those from the standard Soxhlet procedure. The reproducibility of FBE was the best, with RSDs ranging from 0.3 to 3.9%. Under the investigated operation conditions UE was not efficient, with the recoveries of target compounds being about 50% less than Soxhlet. Additionally, the performances of Soxhlet, dive-in Soxhlet, MAE, ASE and FBE were validated by determination of the certified reference material BCR-115. The results from the extraction techniques were in good agreement with the certified values.     

Comparison of accelerated solvent extraction with microwave-assisted extraction and Soxhlet for the extraction of chlorinated biphenyls in soil samples

The extraction and determination of chlorinated biphenyls (CBs) in soils and solid wastes is an ongoing subject of study. This is an overview article that compares the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) techniques. The extraction of CBs by ASE has been optimised taking into account the variation of pressure, temperature and extraction time by means of experimental design and the Simplex approach. The recoveries obtained under the optimum conditions are compared and discussed with those obtained from MAE and Soxhlet extractions.