A Feynman-Kac gauge for solvability of the Schrödinger equation

Let {X_t, t ≥ 0} be Brownian motion in $\text{R}$^d (d ≥ 1). Let D be a bounded domain in $\text{R}$^d with C² boundary, ?D, and let q be a continuous (if d = 1), Hölder continuous (if d ≥ 2) function in D?. If the Feynman-Kac “gauge” E_x{exp(∝₀^τ_Dq(X_t)dt)1_A(X_τD)}, where τ_D is the first exit time from D, is finite for some non-empty open set A on ?D and some x?D, then for any $\text{? ? C}{}^0\text{(?D}$), is the unique solution in $\text{C}{}^2\text{(D) ∩ C}{}^0\text{(}\text{D}\text{?}\text{)}$ of the Schrödinger boundary value problem $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{Δ}\text{+ q)φ = 0}\text{in}\text{D, φ = ?}\text{on}\text{?D}$.     

Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,II

Let L = ∑_{j = 1}^mX_j² be sum of squares of vector fields in $\text{R}$ⁿ satisfying a Hörmander condition of order 2: span{X_j, [X_i, X_j]} is the full tangent space at each point. A point x??D of a smooth domain D is characteristic if X₁,…, X_m are all tangent to ?D at x. We prove sharp estimates in non-isotropic Lipschitz classes for the Dirichlet problem near (generic) isolated characteristic points in two special cases: (a) The Grushin operator $\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}^2\text{+ x}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{?t}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$². (b) The real part of the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2\text{+ (}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$^{2n + 1}. In contrast to non-characteristic points, C^∞ regularity may fail at a characteristic point. The precise order of regularity depends on the shape of ?D at x.     

Equations du type de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés Riemanniennes compactes,III

Let (V_n, g) be a C^∞ compact Riemannian manifold without boundary. Given the following changes of metric: $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= g +}\text{Hess}\text{? ±}\text{l}\text{α}{}^2\text{(▽ ? ? ▽?),}\text{g}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= ±?g + α}{}^2\text{Hess}\text{?}$, where a is a fixed constant, we study the corresponding Monge-Ampère equations (1)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P,▽?;?)}$, (2)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦}\text{g}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P, ▽?; ?)}$. We first solve Eq. (2)^?, under some simple assumptions on F?C^∞. Then, using an appropriate change of functions that enables us to take advantage of the estimates just carried out for Eq. (2)^?, we extend to Eq.(1)^? all the results proved in our previous articles [5, 6] for the usual Monge-Ampère equation. Although equation (2)⁺ is not locally invertible, and does not even admit a solution for all $\text{F = λ? + ?, λ > 0, f ? C}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(V}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, a similar change of functions leads to partial results about Eq. (1)⁺, via C² and C³ estimates for Eq. (2)⁺. Eventually we give some comments and errata of our previous article (P. Delanoë, J. Funct. Anal.41 (1981), 341–353).     

On Dynkin's Markov property of random fields associated with symmetric processes

Let p(t, x, y) be a symmetric transition density with respect to a σ-finite measure m on (E, $\text{E}$), g(x,y)=∫p(t,x,y)dt, and $\text{M}\text{={σ-finite measures μ?0:∫g(x,y)μ(}\text{d}\text{x)μ(}\text{d}\text{y)<∞}}$. There exists a Gaussian random field $\text{Φ={?}{}_{\mathrm{\mu }}\text{:μ?}\text{M}\text{}}$ with mean 0 and covariance $\text{E}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{\mu }}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{\nu }}\text{=∫g(x,y)μ(}\text{d}\text{x)ν(}\text{d}\text{y)}$. Letting $\text{F}\text{(B)=σ{?}{}_{\mathrm{\mu }}\text{:μ(B}{}^{\mathrm{c}}\text{)=0}}$ we consider necessary and sufficient conditions for the Markov property (MP) on sets B, C: $\text{F}$(B), $\text{F}$(C) c.i. given $\text{F}$(B ∩ C). Of crucial importance is the following, proved by Dynkin: $\text{E}\text{{?}{}_{\mathrm{\mu }}\text{∣}\text{F}\text{(B)}=?}{}_{\mathrm{\mu B}}$, where μ_B is the hitting distribution of the process corresponding to p, m with initial law μ. Another important fact is that ?_μ=?_ν iff μ, ν have the same potential. Putting these together with an additional transience assumption, we present a potential theoretic proof of the following necessary and sufficient condition for (MP) on sets B, C: For every x?E, T_B∩C=T_B+T_C∮ θ_TB=T_C+T_B∮θ_TC a.s. P^x where, for D ? $\text{E}$, T_D is the hitting time of D for the process associated with p, m. This implies a necessary condition proved by Dynkin in a recent preprint for the case where B∪C=E and B, C are finely closed.     

Temporal exponential decay for the Stark effect in atoms

Let $\text{H}{}_1\text{= ?∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{(Δ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+ V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)) + ∑}{}_{\mathrm{1\; ?\; i\; <j\; ?\; N}}\text{¦}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{, V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) = N ∝ ¦}\text{x}\text{?}\text{y}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{?(}\text{y}\text{)d}\text{y}$, with ? a normalized Gaussian. Suppose $\text{E}$ ≠ 0 and that $\text{H = H}{}_1\text{+}\text{E}\text{· (∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ has no eigenfunctions in L²($\text{R}$^3N. If H₁ψ = μψ with μ < infσ_ess(H₁), then (ψ, e^?itHψ) decays exponentially at a rate governed by the positions of the resonances of H.     

K-theory for the leaf space of foliations by Reeb components

The K-theory of the C¹-algebra $\text{C}{}^1\text{(V, F)}$ associated to C^∞-foliations (V, F) of a manifold V in the simplest non-trivial case, i.e., dim V = 2, is studied. Since the case of the Kronecker foliation was settled by Pimsner and Voiculescu (J. Operator Theory4 (1980), 93–118), the remaining problem deals with foliations by Reeb components. The K-theory of $\text{C}{}^1\text{(V, F)}$ for the Reeb foliation of S³ is also computed. In these cases the C¹-algebra $\text{C}{}^1\text{(V, F)}$ is obtained from simpler C¹-algebras by means of pullback diagrams and short exact sequences. The K-groups $\text{K}{}_1\text{(C}{}^1\text{(V, F))}$ are computed using the associated Mayer-Vietoris and six-term exact sequences. The results characterize the C¹-algebra of the Reeb foliation of $\text{T}$² uniquely as an extension of C(S¹) by C(S¹). For the foliations of $\text{T}$² it is found that the K-groups count the number of Reeb components separated by stable compact leaves. A C^∞-foliation of $\text{T}$² such that K₁(C¹($\text{T}$², F)) has infinite rank is also constructed. Finally it is proved, by explicit calculation using (M. Penington, “K-Theory and C¹-Algebras of Lie Groups and Foliations,” D. Phil. thesis, Oxford, 1983), that the natural map $\text{μ: K}{}_1\text{,}{}_{\mathrm{\tau }}\text{(BG) → K}{}_1\text{(C}{}^1\text{(V, F))}$ is an isomorphism for foliations by Reeb components of $\text{T}$² and S³. In particular this proves the Baum-Connes conjecture (P. Baum and A. Connes, Geometric K-theory for Lie groups, preprint, 1982; A. Connes, Proc. Symp. Pure Math.38 (1982), 521–628) when V = $\text{T}$².     

Relative locality of derivations

Let H and K be symmetric linear operators on a C¹-algebra $\text{U}$ with domains D(H) and D(K). H is defined to be strongly K-local if $\text{ω(K(A)}{}^1\text{K(A)) = 0}$ implies $\text{ω(H(A)}{}^1\text{H(A)) = 0}$ for A?D(H) ∩ D(K) and ω in the state space of $\text{U}$, and H is completely strongly K-local if $\text{Ω(K(A)}{}^1\text{K(A))=0}$ implies $\text{Ω(H(A)}{}^1\text{H(A))=0}$ for A ∈ D(H) ∩ D(K) and Ω in the state of $\text{U}$, and H is cpmpletely strongly K-local if $\text{H??}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ is $\text{K??}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$-local on U?M_n for all n ? 1, where $\text{1}$_n is the identity on the n × n matrices M_n. If $\text{U}$ is abelian then strong locality and complete strong locality are equivalent. The main result states that if τ is a strongly continuous one-parameter group of ¹-automorphisms of $\text{U}$ with generator δ₀ and δ is a derivation which commutes with τ and is completely strongly δ₀-local then δ generates a group α of ¹-automorphisms of $\text{U}$. Various characterizations of α are given and the particular case of periodic τ is discussed.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

Generalizations of two inequalities involving hermitian forms

Let λ₁ and λ_N be, respectively, the greatest and smallest eigenvalues of an N×N hermitian matrix H=(h_ij), and x=(x₁,x₂,…,x_N) with (x,x)=1. Then, it is known that (1) λ₁?(x,Hx)?λ_N and (2) if, in addition, H is positive definite, $\text{(λ}{}_1\text{+λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{)}{}^2\text{4λ}{}_1\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{?(x,Hx)(x,H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{x)?1}$. Assuming that y=(y₁,y₂,…, y_N) and |y_i|?1, i=1,2,…,N, it is shown in this paper that these inequalities remain true if H and H^?1 are, respectively, replaced by the Hadamard products $\text{M(y)1H}$ and $\text{M(y)1H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, where M(y) is a matrix defined by $\text{M(y)=(δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{+(1?δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{)}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$. Subsequently, these results are extended to improve the spectral bounds of $\text{M(y)1H}$.     

Unitarization of symplectics and stability for causal differential equations in Hilbert space

Let Sp($\text{H}$) be the symplectic group for a complex Hibert space $\text{H}$. Its Lie algebra sp($\text{H}$) contains an open invariant convex cone C₀; each element of C₀ commutes with a unique sympletic complex structure. The Cayley transform $\text{C}$: X∈ sp($\text{H}$)→(I + X)¹∈ Sp($\text{H}$) is analyzed and compared with the exponential mapping. As an application we consider equations of the form $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{) S = A(t)S,}\text{where}\text{t → A(t) ?}\text{C}\text{?}{}_0$ is strongly continuous, and show that if ∝_?∞^∞ ∥A(t)∥ dt < 2 and ∝_{? t8}^∞A(t) dt?C₀, the (scattering) operator

, where S_t′(t) is the solution such that S_t′(t′) = I, is in the range of $\text{B}$ restricted to C₀. It follows that S leaves invariant a unique complex structure; in particular, it is conjugate in Sp($\text{H}$) to a unitary operator.     

Decomposability of symmetric multilinear functions

Let V denote a finite dimensional vector space over a field K of characteristic 0, let T_n(V) denote the vector space whose elements are the K-valued n-linear functions on V, and let S_n(V) denote the subspace of T_n(V) whose members are the fully symmetric members of T_n(V). If $\text{L}$_n denotes the symmetric group on {1,2,…,n} then we define the projection $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{: T}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V) → S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V)}$ by the formula , where P_σ : T_n(V) → T_n(V) is defined so that P_σ(A)(y₁,y₂,…,y_n = A(y_σ(1),y_σ(2),…,y_σ(n)) for each A?T_n(V) and y_i?V, 1 ? i ? n. If $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, then x₁?x₂? … ?x_n denotes the member of T_n(V) such that $\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{· ? ? ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)(y}{}_1\text{,y}{}_2\text{,…,y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) = П}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ for each y₁ ,₂,…,y_n in V, and x₁·x₂… x_n denotes $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{? … ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$. If B? S_n(V) and there exists $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, such that B = x₁·x₂…x_n, then B is said to be decomposable. We present two sets of necessary and sufficient conditions for a member B of S_n(V) to be decomposable. One of these sets is valid for an arbitrary field of characteristic zero, while the other requires that K = R or C.     

Positive definite distributions on K\GK

Let G be a semisimple noncompact Lie group with finite center and let K be a maximal compact subgroup. Then W. H. Barker has shown that if T is a positive definite distribution on G, then T extends to Harish-Chandra's Schwartz space $\text{C}$¹(G). We show that the corresponding property is no longer true for the space of double cosets $\text{K}\text{G}\text{K}$. If G is of real-rank 1, we construct liner functionals $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{? (C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{))′}$ for each p, 0 < p ? 2, such that $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$ but T_p does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. In particular, if p ? 1, T_v does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^1\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. We use this to answer a question (in the negative) raised by Barker whether for a K-bi-invariant distribution T on G to be positive definite it is enough to verify that $\text{T(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. The main tool used is a theorem of Trombi-Varadarajan.     

Positive operators on the n-dimensional ice cream cone

Let $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {x ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{: (x}{}_1{}^2\text{+ · +x}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{n?1}}\text{)}\text{1}\text{2}\text{? x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$ be the n-dimensional ice cream cone, and let Γ(K_n) be the cone of all matrices in $\text{R}$ⁿⁿ mapping K_n into itself. We determine the structure of Γ(K_n), and in particular characterize the extreme matrices in Γ(K_n).     

Levy's stochastic area formula in higher dimensions

Let (W_t) = (W¹_t,W²_t,…,W^d_t), d ? 2, be a d-dimensional standard Brownian motion and let A(t) be a bounded measurable function from $\text{R}$⁺ into the space of d × d skew-symmetric matrices and x(t) such a function into $\text{R}$^d. A class of stochastic processes (L_t^A,x), a particular example of which is Levy's “stochastic area” $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{?t}}\text{(W}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{,dW}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{? W}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{,dW}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}$, is dealt with.The joint characteristic function of W_t and L₁^A,x is calculated and based on this result a formula for fundamental solutions for the hypoelliptic operators which generate the diffusions (W_t,L_t^A,x) is given.     

Infinite-variate wide-sense Markov processes and functional analysis for bounded operator-forming vectors

Let p, q be arbitrary parameter sets, and let $\text{H}$ be a Hilbert space. We say that x = (xⁱ)_i?q, xⁱ ? $\text{H}$, is a bounded operator-forming vector (?$\text{H}$_F^q) if the Gram matrix 〈x, x〉 = [(xⁱ, x^j)]_i?q,j?q is the matrix of a bounded (necessarily ≥ 0) operator on $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$, the Hilbert space of square-summable complex-valued functions on q. Let A be p × q, i.e., let A be a linear operator from $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$ to $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^2$. Then exists a linear operator ǎ from (the Banach space) $\text{H}$_F^q to $\text{H}$_F^p on $\text{D}$(A) = {x:x ? $\text{H}$_F^q, $\text{A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is p × q bounded on $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$} such that y = ǎx satisfies y^j?σ(x) = {space spanned by the xⁱ}, 〈y, x〉 = A〈x, x〉 and $\text{〈y, y〉 = A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}{}^1$. This is a generalization of our earlier [J. Multivariate Anal.4 (1974), 166–209; 6 (1976), 538–571] results for the case of a spectral measure concentrated on one point. We apply these tools to investigate q-variate wide-sense Markov processes.     

Estimées Ck pour les couronnes de convexes de type fini de Cn

C^k estimates for convex domains of finite type in $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are known from Alexandre (C. R. Acad. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 23–26). We now want to show the same result for annuli. Precisely, we show that for all convex domains D and D′ relatively compact of $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, of finite type m and m′ such that $\text{D}\text{?D′}$, for all q=1,…,n?2, there exists a linear operator $\text{T}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{q}}$ from $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{0,q}}\text{(}\text{D′?D}\text{)}$ to $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{0,q?1}}\text{(}\text{D′?D}\text{)}$ such that for all $\text{k∈}\text{N}$ and all (0,q)-form f, $\text{?}\text{?}$-closed of regularity C^k up to the boundary, $\text{T}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{f}$ is of regularity C^{k+1/max(m,m′)} up to the boundary and $\text{?}\text{?}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^1\text{f=f}$. We fit the method of Diederich, Fisher and Fornaess to the annuli by switching z and ζ. However, the integration kernel will not have the same behavior on the frontier as in the Diederich–Fischer–Fornaess case and we have to alter the Diederich–Fornaess support function which will not be holomorphic anymore. Also, we take care of the so generated residual term in the homotopy formula and show that it is extremely regular so that solve the $\text{?}\text{?}$ problem for it will not be difficult. To cite this article: W. Alexandre, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

Étude d'une équation de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes

On a compact Kähler manifold of complex dimension m ? 2, let us consider the change of Kähler metric $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{= g}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{+ ?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{φ}$. Let F?C^∞(V × R) be a function everywhere > 0 and v a real number ≠ 0. When $\text{0 < C}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? F(x, t) ? C(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+ 1)}$ for all (x, t) ?V × ] ?∞, t₀], where C and t₀ are constants and $\text{1 ? a <}\text{m}\text{(m ? 1)}$, one exhibits a function φ?C^∞ (V) such that $\text{¦g′∥g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= e}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\nu </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gf</mtext>}}\text{F(x, φ ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf) (¦g¦}\text{and}\text{¦g′¦}$ the determinants of the metrics g and $\text{g′,}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf = (}\text{mes}\text{V)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∝ φ dV)}$.