Normalized Leonard pairs and Askey-Wilson relations

Let V denote a vector space with finite positive dimension, and let (A, A^∗) denote a Leonard pair on V. As is known, the linear transformations A, A^∗ satisfy the Askey-Wilson relations

     

The structure of a tridiagonal pair

Let K denote a field and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension.We consider a pair of K-linear transformations A:V→V and A^∗:V→V that satisfy the following conditions: (i) each of A,A^∗ is diagonalizable; (ii) there exists an ordering of the eigenspaces of A such that A^∗V_i⊆V_i-1+V_i+V_i+1 for 0?i?d, where V_-1=0 and V_d+1=0; (iii) there exists an ordering of the eigenspaces of A^∗ such that for 0?i?δ, where and ; (iv) there is no subspace W of V such that AW⊆W,A^∗W⊆W,W≠0,W≠V.We call such a pair a tridiagonal pair on V. It is known that d=δ and for 0?i?d the dimensions of coincide.In this paper we show that the following (i)-(iv) hold provided that K is algebraically closed: (i) Each of has dimension 1.(ii) There exists a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form 〈,〉 on V such that 〈Au,v〉=〈u,Av〉 and 〈A^∗u,v〉=〈u,A^∗v〉 for all u,v∈V.(iii) There exists a unique anti-automorphism of End(V) that fixes each of A,A^∗.(iv) The pair A,A^∗ is determined up to isomorphism by the data , where θ_i (resp.) is the eigenvalue of A (resp.A^∗) on V_i (resp.), and is the split sequence of A,A^∗ corresponding to and .     

Asymptotic properties of generalized Laguerre orthogonal polynomials

In the present paper we deal with the polynomials L_n^(α,M,N) (x) orthogonal with respect to the Sobolev inner product

     

Balanced Leonard pairs

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. By a Leonard pair on V we mean an ordered pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A^∗ : V → V that satisfy the following two conditions:

(i)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A^∗ is diagonal.

(ii)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A^∗ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal.

Let (respectively v₀, v₁, … , v_d) denote a basis for V that satisfies (i) (respectively (ii)). For 0 ? i ? d, let a_i denote the coefficient of , when we write as a linear combination of , and let denote the coefficient of v_i, when we write A^∗v_i as a linear combination of v₀, v₁, … , v_d.In this paper we show a₀ = a_d if and only if . Moreover we show that for d ? 1 the following are equivalent; (i) a₀ = a_d and a₁ = a_d−1; (ii) and ; (iii) a_i = a_d−i and for 0 ? i ? d. These give a proof of a conjecture by the second author. We say A, A^∗ is balanced whenever a_i = a_d−i and for 0 ? i ? d. We say A,A^∗ is essentially bipartite (respectively essentially dual bipartite) whenever a_i (respectively ) is independent of i for 0 ? i ? d. Observe that if A, A^∗ is essentially bipartite or dual bipartite, then A, A^∗ is balanced. For d ≠ 2, we show that if A, A^∗ is balanced then A, A^∗ is essentially bipartite or dual bipartite.     

On a class of analytic functions with missing coefficients

Let T_n(A,B,α) denote the class of functions of the form:

     

The switching element for a Leonard pair

Let V denote a vector space with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A:V→V and A^∗:V→V that satisfy (i) and (ii) below:

(i)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A^∗ is diagonal.

(ii)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A^∗ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal.

We call such a pair a Leonard pair on V. Let (resp. ) denote a basis for V referred to in (i) (resp. (ii)). We show that there exists a unique linear transformation S:V→V that sends v₀ to a scalar multiple of v_d, fixes w₀, and sends w_i to a scalar multiple of w_i for 1?i?d. We call S the switching element. We describe S from many points of view.     

Linear transformations that are tridiagonal with respect to both eigenbases of a Leonard pair

Let V denote a vector space with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A^∗ : V → V that satisfy (i) and (ii) below:

(i)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A^∗ is diagonal.

(ii)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A^∗ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal.

We call such a pair a Leonard pair on V. Let X denote the set of linear transformations X : V → V such that the matrix representing X with respect to the basis (i) is tridiagonal and the matrix representing X with respect to the basis (ii) is tridiagonal. We show that X is spanned by

     

Initial blow-up of solutions of semilinear parabolic inequalities

We study classical nonnegative solutions u(x,t) of the semilinear parabolic inequalities

     

When do linear combinations of orthogonal polynomials yield new sequences of orthogonal polynomials?

Given {P_n}_n≥0 a sequence of monic orthogonal polynomials, we analyze their linear combinations with constant coefficients and fixed length, i.e., 

     

On the stable rank of algebras of operator fields over metric spaces

Let Γ be a finitely generated, torsion-free, two-step nilpotent group. Let C^*(Γ) denote the universal C^*-algebra of Γ. We show that , where for a unital C^*-algebra A, sr(A) is the stable rank of A, and where is the space of one-dimensional representations of Γ. In process, we give a stable rank estimate for maximal full algebras of operator fields over metric spaces.     

Zeros of linear combinations of Laguerre polynomials from different sequences

We study interlacing properties of the zeros of two types of linear combinations of Laguerre polynomials with different parameters, namely and . Proofs and numerical counterexamples are given in situations where the zeros of R_n, and S_n, respectively, interlace (or do not in general) with the zeros of , , k=n or n−1. The results we prove hold for continuous, as well as integral, shifts of the parameter α.     

Some trace formulae involving the split sequences of a Leonard pair

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A^∗ : V → V that satisfy (i) and (ii) below:

(i)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A^∗ is diagonal.

(ii)

There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A^∗ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal.

We call such a pair a Leonard pair on V. Let diag(θ₀, θ₁, … , θ_d) denote the diagonal matrix referred to in (ii) above and let denote the diagonal matrix referred to in (i) above. It is known that there exists a basis u₀, u₁, … , u_d for V and there exist scalars ?₁, ?₂, … , ?_d in K such that Au_i = θ_iu_i + u_i+1 (0 ? i ? d − 1), Au_d = θ_du_d, , . The sequence ?₁, ?₂, … , ?_d is called the first split sequence of the Leonard pair. It is known that there exists a basis v₀, v₁, … , v_d for V and there exist scalars ?₁, ?₂, … , ?_d in K such that Av_i = θ_d−iv_i + v_i+1 (0 ? i ? d − 1),Av_d = θ₀v_d, , . The sequence ?₁, ?₂, … , ?_d is called the second split sequence of the Leonard pair. We display some attractive formulae for the first and second split sequence that involve the trace function.     

Second-order energies on thin structures: variational theory and non-local effects

For a given positive measure μ on , we consider integral functionals of the kind

     

The local variational principle of topological pressure for sub-additive potentials

Let (X,T) be a topological dynamical system and be a sub-additive potential on C(X,R). Let U be an open cover of X. Then for any T-invariant measure μ, let . The topological pressure for open covers U is defined for sub-additive potentials. Then we have a variational principle:

     

A generalization of Kneser's Addition Theorem

Let A=(A₁,…,Am) be a sequence of finite subsets from an additive abelian group G. Let Σ?(A) denote the set of all group elements representable as a sum of ? elements from distinct terms of A, and set . Our main theorem is the following lower bound:

     

A new extension of the Erd?s-Heilbronn conjecture

Let A₁,…,An be finite subsets of a field F, and let

     

Several remarks on dimensions modulo ANR-compacta

We investigate a dimension function L-dim (L is a class of ANR-compacta). Main results are as follows.Let L be an ANR-compactum.(1) If L*L is not contractible, then for every n?0 there is a cube Im with .(2) If L is simply connected and f:X→Y is an acyclic mapping from a finite-dimensional compact Hausdorff space X onto a finite-dimensional space Y, then .(3) If L is simply connected and L*L is not contractible, then for every n?2 there exists a compact Hausdorff space such that , and for an arbitrary closed set either or .     

Hessenberg pairs of linear transformations

Let denote a field and V denote a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over . We consider an ordered pair of linear transformations A:V→V and A^*:V→V that satisfy (i)–(iii) below.

1. [(i)]Each of A,A^* is diagonalizable on V.

2. [(ii)]There exists an ordering of the eigenspaces of A such that

where V_-1=0, V_d+1=0.

3. [(iii)]There exists an ordering of the eigenspaces of A^* such that

where , .

We call such a pair a Hessenberg pair on V. In this paper we obtain some characterizations of Hessenberg pairs. We also explain how Hessenberg pairs are related to tridiagonal pairs.