Understanding and advancing graduate teaching assistants’ mathematical knowledge for teaching

Graduate student teaching assistants (GTAs) usually teach introductory level courses at the undergraduate level. Since GTAs constitute the majority of future mathematics faculty, their image of effective teaching and preparedness to lead instructional improvements will impact future directions in undergraduate mathematics curriculum and instruction. In this paper, we argue for the need to support GTAs in improving their mathematical meanings of foundational ideas and their ability to support productive student thinking. By investigating GTAs’ meanings for average rate of change, a key content area in precalculus and calculus, we found evidence that even mathematically sophisticated GTAs possess impoverished meanings of this key idea. We argue for the need, and highlight one approach, for supporting GTAs to improve their understanding of foundational mathematical ideas and how these ideas are learned.     

Teachers’ beliefs towards teaching calculus

This paper focuses on the belief systems towards teaching calculus of 29 upper secondary mathematics teachers. Firstly, we discuss different educational trends in teaching calculus, and the theoretical approach based on the construct of belief systems. Afterwards we describe the method of our study used to analyse the belief systems of the calculus teachers. Referring to findings of our research, we firstly focus on central and peripheral beliefs and thus discuss the structure of the teachers’ belief systems. Further, we compare the teachers’ belief systems to established educational trends of teaching calculus. Finally, we conclude the paper by reflecting on our main findings and by discussing possible directions of further research.     

Factors shaping mathematics lecturers’ service teaching in different departments

In this article we focus on university lecturers’ approaches to the service teaching and factors that influence their approaches. We present data obtained from the interviews with 19 mathematics and three physics lecturers along with the observations of two mathematics lecturers’ calculus courses. The findings show that lecturers’ approaches to teaching the same topic vary across departments; that is, they consciously privilege different aspects of mathematics, set different questions on examinations and follow different textbooks while teaching in different departments. We discuss factors influencing lecturers’ decision of what (mathematics) to teach in different departments and offer educational implications for service mathematics teaching in terms of students’ mathematical needs and the role of mathematics for client students.     

Parameters optimization of selected casting processes using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm

In the present work, mathematical models of three important casting processes are considered namely squeeze casting, continuous casting and die casting for the parameters optimization of respective processes. A recently developed advanced optimization algorithm named as teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) is used for the parameters optimization of these casting processes. Each process is described with a suitable example which involves respective process parameters. The mathematical model related to the squeeze casting is a multi-objective problem whereas the model related to the continuous casting is multi-objective multi-constrained problem and the problem related to the die casting is a single objective problem. The mathematical models which are considered in the present work were previously attempted by genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithms. However, attempt is made in the present work to minimize the computational efforts using the TLBO algorithm. Considerable improvements in results are obtained in all the cases and it is believed that a global optimum solution is achieved in the case of die casting process.     

Researcher–teacher relationships and models for teaching development in mathematics education

This article offers theoretical and analytical approaches to investigating how researchers and teachers can work together to create knowledge in mathematics education. It argues that researchers and teachers are members of separate, but related, communities of practice, which create and value different types of knowledge. However, connections between communities can be established through discrete boundary encounters, longer term boundary practices, or peripheral participation by members of one community in the practices of another community. A framework for analyzing researcher–teacher relationships is presented and then used to compare ways in which I, as a university-based researcher, worked with teachers in three different types of research projects. The analysis indicates that successful research collaborations are characterized by mutuality of researcher and teacher motivations, roles, and purposes, and complementarity of their expertise and knowledge. Such collaborations build two-way connections between communities through practices that support mutual engagement across the boundaries that define them.     

Learning study – promoting and hindering factors in mathematics teaching

This article focuses on presenting success factors for a group of teachers in carrying out a learning study in mathematics at their school. The research questions are: what are the actions of the school teaching community during development projects? What factors enable a group of teachers to carry out a learning study at their school? Activity theory provides a holistic framework to investigate relationships among the components present in a learning study. The results are based on analysis of interviews with teachers, students, principal organizers of schools and project coordinators, videotaped lessons, students’ tests and minutes taken at meetings of mathematics projects. The results show that the skills of facilitators, the time devoted to collaborative work, the link to learning theory and avoiding overly comprehensive content when teaching lessons are important promoting factors in mathematics teaching. The findings raise important questions about the way in which teacher work within universities.     

Mathematics teaching and values education—an intersection in need of research

This paper raises issues concerning the teaching of values in the context of mathematics education. It argues that a focus on education for democracy inevitably involves educating about values. It reviews the major relevant research and theoretical perspectives and argues for more research attention to be paid to this area. Although there has been relevant research done in the affective domain, both in general and in relation to mathematics, and in social and cultural issues, there is little direct research focus on either values or valuing. Teachers are rarely aware of teaching values either explicitly or implicitly, yet values teaching clearly does take place, mostly implicitly. If there are desires to change the directions of mathematics teaching to be more attuned to life in modern democratic societies then this aspect of mathematics education needs to be better understood in order that it can be better taught.     

The functions of function discourse – university mathematics teaching from a commognitive standpoint

This paper addresses a topic within university mathematics education which has been somewhat underexplored: the teaching practices actually used by university mathematics teachers when giving lectures. The study investigates the teaching practices of seven Swedish university teachers on the topic of functions using a discursive approach, the commognitive framework of Sfard. In the paper a categorization of the construction and substantiation routines used by the teachers is presented, for instance various routines for constructing definitions and examples, and for verifying whether an example satisfies a given definition. The findings show that although the overall form of the lectures is similar, with teachers using ‘chalk talk’, and overt student participation limited to asking and answering questions, there are in fact significant differences in the way the teachers present and do mathematics in their lectures. These differences present themselves both on the level of discursive routines and on a more general level in how the process of doing mathematics is made visible in the teachers’ teaching practices. Moreover, I believe that many of the results of the study could be relevant for investigating the teaching of other mathematical topics.     

Students’ experiences with mathematics teaching and learning: listening to unheard voices

This study documents students’ views about the nature of mathematics, the mathematics learning process and factors within the classroom that are perceived to impact upon the learning of mathematics. The participants were senior secondary school students. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to understand the students’ views about their experiences with mathematics learning and mathematics classroom environment. Interviews of students and mathematics lesson observations were analysed to understand how students view their mathematics classes. A questionnaire was used to solicit students’ views with regards to teaching approaches in mathematics classes. The results suggest that students consider learning and understanding mathematics to mean being successful in getting the correct answers. Students reported that in the majority of cases, the teaching of mathematics was lecture-oriented. Mathematics language was considered a barrier in learning some topics in mathematics. The use of informal language was also evident during mathematics class lessons.     

Elementary mathematics specialists in “departmentalized” teaching assignments: Affordances and constraints

In this article, we describe the experiences of three Elementary Mathematics Specialists (EMS) who were part of a larger project investigating the impact of EMS certification and assignment (self-contained or “departmentalized”) on teaching practices and student achievement outcomes. All three of the teachers were “departmentalized,” in the sense that each was responsible for teaching mathematics to at least two groups of students, and accordingly, did not teach all subjects as would a typical self-contained elementary teacher. Each teacher had recently earned an Elementary Mathematics Specialist certificate through completion of a 24-credit, graduate-level program designed to build pedagogical content knowledge and leadership capacity in mathematics. Through a series of observations and interviews over the course of one school year, we examined how the teachers described and navigated specific affordances and constraints they encountered in their particular contexts. Common affordances included opportunities to revise and learn from instruction, and constraints included reduced flexibility introduced by the need to schedule multiple classes of mathematics. Despite these common features, we found important differences between the three models of departmentalization, which we describe as team approach, class swap, and grade-level mathematics teacher. For example, some of the models provided more opportunities for collaboration while others made it difficult for teachers to address potential inequities in learning opportunities across sections. Despite the constraints of their respective models, we found evidence of the EMS-certified teachers drawing on professional expertise in mathematics to meet student needs.     

Understanding kindergarten teachers’ perspectives of teaching basic geometric shapes: a phenomenographic research

Geometry is one of the disciplines children involve within early years of their lives. However, there is not much information about geometry education in Turkish kindergarten classes. The current study aims to examine teachers’ perspectives on teaching geometry in kindergarten classes. The researchers inquired about teachers’ in-class experiences in geometry and asked a series of questions such as “what are the benchmarks in your kindergarten class?”; “what kind of tools and materials you use to teach geometry in your class?”; “what shape do you teach first in your kindergarten class?”; “what do you expect to hear when you asked your students ‘what is square’?”; “how do you teach rectangular?”. The study utilized one of the qualitative research methods, namely phenomenography, to collect the data and analyze the data. The study involved with eight kindergarten teachers who work in different schools in central Kutahya, Turkey. The researchers collected data by conducting face-to-face half-structured interviews. The findings of this phenomenographic research showed that kindergarten teachers have some difficulties in teaching geometry and have lack of knowledge and skills in teaching geometry in kindergarten classes.     

Instructors’ use of technology in post-secondary undergraduate mathematics teaching: a local study

In this study, instructors of undergraduate mathematics from post-secondary institutions in Newfoundland were surveyed (N = 13) and interviewed (N = 8) about their use of, experiences with, and views on, technologically assisted teaching. It was found that the majority of them regularly use technologies for organizational and communication purposes. However, the use of math-specific technology such as computer algebra systems, or dynamic geometry software for instructional, exploratory, and creative activities with students takes place mostly on an individual basis, only occasionally, and is very much topic specific. This was even the case for those instructors who use technology proficiently in their research. The data also suggested that familiarity with and discussions of examples of technology implementation in teaching at regular and field-oriented professional development seminars within mathematics departments could potentially increase the use of math-specific technology by instructors.     

Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study

This study examines co-learning of mathematics practicing teachers and mathematics teaching researchers through parallel lesson study in China. Two cases are illustrated and compared to highlight what practicing teachers and teaching researchers learned. The practicing teachers developed their competence in identifying instructional objectives, improving instructional process, selecting and sequencing mathematical tasks, and developing professional vision. The mathematics teaching researchers developed their professional competence in effectively carrying out teaching research activities, effectively mentoring teachers, and deepening the understanding of teaching.     

Is close enough good enough? Reflections on the use of technology in teaching calculus

In this note, we introduce an interesting example that uses the monotonicity of the definite integral to obtain a good approximation of a particular definite integral. The second objective of this note is to discuss some aspects of the place of technology in teaching calculus topics.     

Novice facilitators’ changes in practices: From launching to managing discussions about mathematics teaching

Novice facilitators of professional development (PD) programs for mathematics teachers often face challenges in leading productive discussions and achieving the goals of these programs. Although research in this area is gradually accumulating, not much is known about how novice facilitators address these challenges and change their practices accordingly. This paper presents case studies of two novice facilitators of PD programs in two different countries. The analyses look at their work over one year, to illustrate the changes in their practices while managing discussions. The results show that although the facilitators operated in different contexts, their practices and their processes of change resembled, suggesting that these processes are not idiosyncratic. We argue that novice facilitators’ changes in practices correspond to changes in their resources, orientations, goals, and identities and that PD program teams can support these changes.     

The intangible task – a revelatory case of teaching mathematical thinking in Japanese elementary schools

This paper deals with the nature of teaching mathematical thinking and presents a case study of a single Japanese lesson where the characteristics of mathematical thinking and the teaching thereof are identified in relation to multiplication. The raison d’être for this teaching is questioned and investigated by looking at how multiplication is described in the curriculum and representative textbook material. It is seen how Japanese teachers are institutionally conditioned to incorporate mathematical thinking in the context of multiplication, something which may appear in contrast to other countries. The lesson is analysed using the notion of praxeologies and didactic co-determination conceptualised in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic.     

Student teachers’ types of probing questions in inquiry-based mathematics teaching with and without GeoGebra

Previous studies have produced several typologies of teacher questions in mathematics. Probing questions that ask students to explain are often included in the types of questions. However, only rare studies have created subtypes for probing questions or investigated how questioning differs depending on whether technology is used or not. The aims of this study are to elaborate on different ways of asking students to give explanations in inquiry-based mathematics teaching and to investigate whether questioning in GeoGebra lessons differs from questioning in other lessons. Data was collected by video recording 29 Finnish mathematics student teachers’ lessons in secondary and upper secondary schools. The lesson videos were coded for the student teachers’ probing questions. After this, categories for the types of probing questions were created, which is elaborated in this paper. It was found that the student teachers who used GeoGebra emphasized conceptual probing questions during the explore phase of a lesson slightly more than the other student teachers.