Affinely equivalent complete flat manifolds

Let E _Aff(Γ,G, m) be the set of affine equivalence classes of m-dimensional complete flat manifolds with a fixed fundamental group Γ and a fixed holonomy group G. Let n be the dimension of a closed flat manifold whose fundamental group is isomorphic to Γ. We describe E _Aff(Γ,G, m) in terms of equivalence classes of pairs (ε, ρ), consisting of epimorphisms of Γ onto G and representations of G in ℝ ^m-n . As an application we give some estimates of card E _Aff(Γ,G, m).     

Computation of Topological Indices of Some Graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple connected graph with vertex set V and edge set E. The Wiener index of G is defined by W(G)=∑_{x,y}⊆V d(x,y), where d(x,y) is the length of the shortest path from x to y. The Szeged index of G is defined by Sz(G)=∑ _e=uv∈E n _u (e|G)n _v (e|G), where n _u (e|G) (resp. n _v (e|G)) is the number of vertices of G closer to u (resp. v) than v (resp. u). The Padmakar–Ivan index of G is defined by PI(G)=∑ _e=uv∈E [n _eu (e|G)+n _ev (e|G)], where n _eu (e|G) (resp. n _ev (e|G)) is the number of edges of G closer to u (resp. v) than v (resp. u). In this paper we find the above indices for various graphs using the group of automorphisms of G. This is an efficient method of finding these indices especially when the automorphism group of G has a few orbits on V or E. We also find the Wiener indices of a few graphs which frequently arise in mathematical chemistry using inductive methods.     

On the normalizer property for integral group rings

Let R(G) denote the intersection of all nonnormal subgroups of a group G. In this note, we prove that for every finite group G, if R(G) is not trivial, then the normalizer property holds forG.     

Recognition of some symmetric groups by the set of the order of their elements

For a finite group G, let π_e(G) be the set of order of elements in G and denote S _n the symmetric group on n letters. We will show that if π_e(G ) = π_e(H), where H is S _p or S _p+1 and p is a prime with 50 < p < 100, then G ≅ H. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Sharp bounds for decompositions of graphs into complete r-partite subgraphs

If G is a graph on n vertices and r ≥ 2, we let m_r(G) denote the minimum number of complete multipartite subgraphs, with r or fewer parts, needed to partition the edge set, E(G). In determining m_r(G), we may assume that no two vertices of G have the same neighbor set. For such reducedgraphs G, we prove that m_r(G) ≥ log₂ (n + r − 1)/r. Furthermore, for each k ≥ 0 and r ≥ 2, there is a unique reduced graph G = G(r, k) with m_r(G) = k for which equality holds. We conclude with a short proof of the known eigenvalue bound m_r(G) ≥ max{n₊ (G, n₋(G)/(r − 1)}, and show that equality holds if G = G(r, k). © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Packing cycles with modularity constraints

We prove that for all positive integers k, there exists an integer N =N(k) such that the following holds. Let G be a graph and let Γ an abelian group with no element of order two. Let γ: E(G)→Γ be a function from the edges of G to the elements of Γ. A non-zero cycle is a cycle C such that Σ _e∈E(C) γ(e) ≠ 0 where 0 is the identity element of Γ. Then G either contains k vertex disjoint non-zero cycles or there exists a set X ⊆ V (G) with |X| ≤N(k) such that G−X contains no non-zero cycle.     

On the greatest number of 2 and 3 colorings of a (v,e)-graph

Let F denote the family of simple undirected graphs on v vertices having e edges ((v, e)-graphs) and P(λ, G) be the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. For the given integers v, e, Δ, let f(v, e, Δ) denote the greatest number of proper colorings in Δ or less colors that a (v, e)-graph G can have, i.e., f(v, e, Δ) = max{P(Δ, G): G ∈ F}. In this paper we determine f(v, e, 2) and describe all graphs G for which P(2, G) = f(v, e, 2). For f(v, e, 3), a lower bound and an upper bound are found.     

Sum List Coloring Graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph with n vertices and e edges. The sum choice number of G is the smallest integer p such that there exist list sizes (f(v):v ∈ V) whose sum is p for which G has a proper coloring no matter which color lists of size f(v) are assigned to the vertices v. The sum choice number is bounded above by n+e. If the sum choice number of G equals n+e, then G is sum choice greedy. Complete graphs K_n are sum choice greedy as are trees. Based on a simple, but powerful, lemma we show that a graph each of whose blocks is sum choice greedy is also sum choice greedy. We also determine the sum choice number of K_2,n, and we show that every tree on n vertices can be obtained from K_n by consecutively deleting single edges where all intermediate graphs are sc-greedy.     

Galois Stability, Integrality and Realization Fields for Representations of Finite Abelian Groups

For a given field F of characteristic 0 we consider a normal extension E/F of finite degree d and finite Abelian subgroups GGL _n (E) of a given exponent t. We assume that G is stable under the natural action of the Galois group of E/F and consider the fields E=F(G) that are obtained via adjoining all matrix coefficients of all matrices gG to F. It is proved that under some reasonable restrictions for n, any E can be realized as F(G), while if all coefficients of matrices in G are algebraic integers, there are only finitely many fields E=F(G) for prescribed integers n and t or prescribed n and d.     

Some Notes on Signed Edge Domination in Graphs

The closed neighborhood N_G[e] of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of e and of all edges having an end-vertex in common with e. Let f be a function on E(G), the edge set of G, into the set {−1, 1}. If for each e ∈ E(G), then f is called a signed edge dominating function of G. The signed edge domination number γ_s^′(G) of G is defined as . Recently, Xu proved that γ_s^′(G) ≥ |V(G)| − |E(G)| for all graphs G without isolated vertices. In this paper we first characterize all simple connected graphs G for which γ_s^′(G) = |V(G)| − |E(G)|. This answers Problem 4.2 of [4]. Then we classify all simple connected graphs G with precisely k cycles and γ_s^′(G) = 1 − k, 2 − k. A. Khodkar: Research supported by a Faculty Research Grant, University of West Georgia. Send offprint requests to: Abdollah Khodkar.     

What is the furthest graph from a hereditary property?

For a graph property P, the edit distance of a graph G from P, denoted E_P(G), is the minimum number of edge modifications (additions or deletions) one needs to apply to G to turn it into a graph satisfying P. What is the furthest graph on n vertices from P and what is the largest possible edit distance from P? Denote this maximal distance by ed(n,P). This question is motivated by algorithmic edge‐modification problems, in which one wishes to find or approximate the value of E_P(G) given an input graph G. A monotone graph property is closed under removal of edges and vertices. Trivially, for any monotone property, the largest edit distance is attained by a complete graph. We show that this is a simple instance of a much broader phenomenon. A hereditary graph property is closed under removal of vertices. We prove that for any hereditary graph property P, a random graph with an edge density that depends on P essentially achieves the maximal distance from P, that is: ed(n,P) = E_P(G(n,p(P))) + o(n²) with high probability. The proofs combine several tools, including strengthened versions of the Szemerédi regularity lemma, properties of random graphs and probabilistic arguments. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2008     

There exist graphs with super‐exponential Ramsey multiplicity constant

The Ramsey multiplicity M(G;n) of a graph G is the minimum number of monochromatic copies of G over all 2‐colorings of the edges of the complete graph K_n. For a graph G with a automorphisms, ν vertices, and E edges, it is natural to define the Ramsey multiplicity constant C(G) to be , which is the limit of the fraction of the total number of copies of G which must be monochromatic in a 2‐coloring of the edges of K_n. In 1980, Burr and Rosta showed that 0 ≥ C(G) ≤ 2^1?E for all graphs G, and conjectured that this upper bound is tight. Counterexamples of Burr and Rosta's conjecture were first found by Sidorenko and Thomason independently. Later, Clark proved that there are graphs G with E edges and 2^E?1C(G) arbitrarily small. We prove that for each positive integer E, there is a graph G with E edges and C(G) ≤ E^{?E/2 + o(E)}. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 57: 89–98, 2008     

Edge‐face chromatic number and edge chromatic number of simple plane graphs

Given a simple plane graph G, an edge‐face k‐coloring of G is a function ? : E(G) ∪ F(G) → {1,…,k} such that, for any two adjacent or incident elements a, b ∈ E(G) ∪ F(G), ?(a) ≠ ?(b). Let χ_e(G), χ_ef(G), and Δ(G) denote the edge chromatic number, the edge‐face chromatic number, and the maximum degree of G, respectively. In this paper, we prove that χ_ef(G) = χ_e(G) = Δ(G) for any 2‐connected simple plane graph G with Δ (G) ≥ 24. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

The size of strength-maximal graphs

Let G be a graph and let k′(G) be the edge-connectivity of G. The strength of G, denoted by k?′(G), is the maximum value of k′(H), where H runs over all subgraphs of G. A simple graph G is called k-maximal if k?′(G) ≤ k but for any edge e ∈ E(G^c), k?′(G + e) ≥ k + 1. Let G be a k-maximal graph of order n. In [3], Mader proved |E(G)| ≤ (n - k)k + (). In this note, we shall show (n - 1)k - () In?n/k + 2)? ≤ |E(G|, and characterize the extremal graphs. We shall also give a characterization of all k-maximal graphs.     

Optimal graphs for chromatic polynomials

Let F(n,e) be the collection of all simple graphs with n vertices and e edges, and for G∈F(n,e) let P(G;λ) be the chromatic polynomial of G. A graph G∈F(n,e) is said to be optimal if another graph H∈F(n,e) does not exist with P(H;λ)?P(G;λ) for all λ, with strict inequality holding for some λ. In this paper we derive necessary conditions for bipartite graphs to be optimal, and show that, contrarily to the case of lower bounds, one can find values of n and e for which optimal graphs are not unique. We also derive necessary conditions for bipartite graphs to have the greatest number of cycles of length 4.     

Pan-connectedness of graphs with large neighborhood unions

Let G be a simple graph with n vertices. For any v ? V(G){v \in V(G)} , let N(v)={u ? V(G): uv ? E(G)}{N(v)=\{u \in V(G): uv \in E(G)\}} , NC(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC(G)= \min \{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and uv \not ? E(G)}{uv \not \in E(G)\}} , and NC₂(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC_2(G)= \min\{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and u and v has distance 2 in E(G)}. Let l ≥ 1 be an integer. A graph G on n ≥ l vertices is [l, n]-pan-connected if for any u, v ? V(G){u, v \in V(G)} , and any integer m with l ≤ m ≤ n, G has a (u, v)-path of length m. In 1998, Wei and Zhu (Graphs Combinatorics 14:263–274, 1998) proved that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [6, n]-pan-connected. They conjectured that such graphs should be [5, n]-pan-connected. In this paper, we prove that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [5, n]-pan-connected. Consequently, the conjecture of Wei and Zhu is proved as NC ₂(G) ≥ NC(G). Furthermore, we show that the lower bound is best possible and characterize all 2-connected graphs with NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1 which are not [4, n]-pan-connected.     

The Fractional Chromatic Number Of The Categorical Product Of Graphs

We prove that the identity

The characterization of zero-sum (mod 2) bipartite Ramsey numbers

Let G be a bipartite graph, with k|e(G). The zero-sum bipartite Ramsey number B(G, Z_k) is the smallest integer t such that in every Z_k-coloring of the edges of K_t,t, there is a zero-sum mod k copy of G in K_t,t. In this article we give the first proof that determines B(G, Z₂) for all possible bipartite graphs G. In fact, we prove a much more general result from which B(G, Z₂) can be deduced: Let G be a (not necessarily connected) bipartite graph, which can be embedded in K_n,n, and let F be a field. A function f : E(K_n,n) → F is called G-stable if every copy of G in K_n,n has the same weight (the weight of a copy is the sum of the values of f on its edges). The set of all G-stable functions, denoted by U(G, K_n,n, F) is a linear space, which is called the K_n,n uniformity space of G over F. We determine U(G, K_n,n, F) and its dimension, for all G, n and F. Utilizing this result in the case F = Z₂, we can compute B(G, Z₂), for all bipartite graphs G. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 29: 151–166, 1998     

On the exponent of tensor categories coming from finite groups

We describe the exponent of a group-theoretical fusion category C = C(G, ω, F, α) associated to a finite group G in terms of group cohomology. We show that the exponent of C divides both e(ω)expG and (expG)², where e(ω) is the cohomological order of the 3-cocycle ω. In particular, expC divides (dim C)². This work was partially supported by CONICET, Fundación Antorchas, Agencia Córdoba Ciencia, ANPCyT and Secyt (UNC).