Alternating Ring‐Opening Metathesis Copolymerization by Grubbs‐Type Initiators with Unsymmetrical N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes

A series of Ru^IV–alkylidenes based on unsymmetrical imidazolin‐2‐ylidenes, that is, [RuCl₂{1‐(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐3‐R‐4,5‐dihydro‐(3H)‐imidazol‐1‐ylidene}(CHPh)(pyridin)] (R=CH₂Ph ( 5 ), Ph ( 6 ), ethyl ( 7 ), methyl ( 8 )), have been synthesized. These and the parent initiators [RuCl₂(PCy₃){1‐(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐3‐R‐4,5‐dihydro‐(3H)‐imidazol‐1‐ylidene}(CHC₆H₅)] (R=CH₂C₆H₅ ( 1 ), C₆H₅ ( 2 ), ethyl ( 3 )) were used for the alternating copolymerization of norborn‐2‐ene (NBE) with cis‐cyclooctene (COE) and cyclopentene (CPE), respectively. Alternating copolymers, that is, poly(NBE‐alt‐COE)_n and poly(NBE‐alt‐CPE)_n containing up to 97 and 91 % alternating diads, respectively, were obtained. The copolymerization parameters of the alternating copolymerization of NBE with CPE under the action of initiators 1 – 3 and 5 – 8 were determined by using both a zero‐ and first‐order Markov model. Finally, kinetic investigations using initiators 1 – 3 , 6 , and 7 were carried out. These revealed that in contrast to the 2nd‐generation Grubbs‐type initiators 1 – 3 the corresponding pyridine derivatives 6 and 7 represent fast and quantitative initiating systems. Hydrogenation of poly(NBE‐alt‐COE)_n yielded a fully saturated, hydrocarbon‐based polymer. Its backbone can formally be derived by 1‐olefin polymerization of CPE (1,3‐insertion) followed by five ethylene units and thus serves as an excellent model compound for 1‐olefin polymerization‐derived copolymers.     

Isocyanate‐ and Isothiocyanate‐Derived RuIV‐Based Alkylidenes: Synthesis,Structure, and Activity

The synthesis and characterization of a series of isocyanate‐ and isothiocyanate‐derived second generation Grubbs–Hoveyda‐type ruthenium–alkylidene complexes, that is, [Ru(N?C?O)₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 1 ), [Ru(N?C?O)₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(=CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 2 ), [Ru(N?C?S)₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 3 ), and [Ru(N?C?S)₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 4 ), and their activity in various metathesis reactions are described. Compounds 1 – 4 were prepared by reaction of the parent complexes [RuCl₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)C₆H₄)] ( 5 ) (IMesH₂=1,3‐bis‐(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [RuCl₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 6 ) with silver cyanate and thiocyanate, respectively. The X‐ray structure of 1 was determined, confirming the isocyanate‐type bonding of the ligand. The isothiocyanate‐type bonding in 3 and 4 was unambiguously confirmed by IR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The isocyanate‐derived complexes 1 and 2 were found to be excellent catalysts for the ring‐opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of cis‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene (COD). Both 1 and 2 yielded poly(COD) with a trans‐content of about 80 %. First‐order kinetics with unprecedentedly high rate constants of polymerization (k_p=0.068 and 0.26 s^?1, respectively) were observed. Compounds 3 and 4 were also active initiators for the ROMP of COD, however, they generated poly(COD) with a cis‐content of 80 and 67 %, respectively. Complexes 1 and 2 also showed good catalytic activity in cross‐metathesis (CM) reactions. Finally, 1 – 4 were also found to be excellent catalysts for the regioselective cyclopolymerization of diethyl 2,2‐dipropargylmalonate (DEDPM), resulting in poly(DEDPM) almost entirely based on five‐membered repeat units, that is, cyclopent‐1‐ene‐1,2‐vinylenes.     

Micron‐granula polyolefin with self‐immobilized nickel and iron diimine catalysts bearing one or two allyl groups

Self‐immobilized nickel and iron diimine catalysts bearing one or two allyl groups of [ArN?C]₂(C₁₀H₆)NiBr₂ [Ar = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₂] ( 1 ), [ArN?C(Me)][Ar′N? C(Me)]C₅H₃NFeCl₂ [Ar = Ar′ = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃, Ar = 2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃, and Ar′ = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃] were synthesized and characterized. All three catalysts were investigated for olefin polymerization. As a result, these catalysts not only showed high activities as the catalyst free from the allyl group, such as [ArN?C]₂C₁₀H₆NiBr₂ (Ar = 2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₂)], but also greatly improved the morphology of polymer particles to afford micron‐granula polyolefin. The self‐immobilization of catalysts, the formation mechanism of microspherical polymer, and the influence on the size of the particles are discussed. The molecular structure of self‐immobilized nickel catalyst 1 was also characterized by crystallographic analysis. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 1018–1024, 2004     

Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Oxidant‐Free Allylation of Aromatic Ketoximes with Allylic Acetates at Room Temperature

Substituted aromatic ketoximes reacted efficiently with allylic acetates in the presence of {[RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂} and AgSbF₆ in 1,2‐dichloroethane at ambient temperature, providing ortho‐allyl aromatic ketoximes in a highly regioselective manner without an oxidant. In the reaction, the acetate group of allyl acetate acts as a base to activate the C?H bond of aromatics. Later, ortho‐allyl aromatic ketoximes were converted into ortho‐allyl aromatic ketones in the presence of HCl.     

Tandem Hydroformylation/Reductive Amination of 3‐Allyl‐2‐methylquinazolin‐4(3H)‐one

The 3‐allyl‐2‐methylquinazolin‐4(3H)‐one ( 1 ), a model functionalized terminal olefin, was submitted to hydroformylation and reductive amination under optimized reaction conditions. The catalytic carbonylation of 1 in the presence of Rh catalysts complexed with phosphorus ligands under different reaction conditions afforded a mixture of 2‐methyl‐4‐oxoquinazoline‐3(4H)‐butanal ( 2 ) and α,2‐dimethyl‐4‐oxoquinazoline‐3(4H)‐propanal ( 3 ) as products of ‘linear’ and ‘branched’ hydroformylation, respectively (Scheme 2). The hydroaminomethylation of quinazolinone 1 with arylhydrazine derivatives gave the expected mixture of [(arylhydrazinyl)alkyl]quinazolinones 5 and 6 , besides a small amount of 2 and 3 (Scheme 3). The tandem hydroformylation/reductive amination reaction of 1 with different amines gave the quinazolinone derivatives 7 – 10 . Compound 10 was used to prepare the chalcones 11a and 11b and pyrazoloquinazolinones 12a and 12b (Scheme 4).     

Syntheses and Structures of Homo‐ and Heterobimetallic Complexes Containing a (Cyclopentadienone)rhodium(I) Fragment

The reaction of [RhCl(η⁴‐Ph₂R₂C₄CO)]₂ (R=Ph, 2‐naphthyl) with the dimeric complexes [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ p‐cymene=1‐methyl‐4‐(1‐methylethyl)benzene, [RuCl₂(1,3,5‐Et₃C₆H₃)]₂, [MCl₂(Cp*)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir; Cp*=1,2,3,4,5‐pentamethylcyclopenta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl), [RuCl₂(CO)₃]₂, [RuCl₂(dcypb)(CO)]₂ (dcypb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[dicyclohexylphosphine]), [(dppb)ClRu(μ‐Cl)₂(μ‐OH₂)RuCl(dppb)] (dppb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[diphenylphosphine]), and [(dcypb)(N₂)Ru(μ‐Cl)₃RuCl(dcypb)] was investigated. In all cases, mixed, chloro‐bridged complexes were formed in quantitative yield (see 5 – 8, 9 – 16, 18, 19, 21 , and 22 ). The six new complexes 5, 8, 9, 13, 15 , and 22 were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis (Figs. 1–3).     

Synthese und Struktur von Ruthenium(II)‐Komplexen mit Triazenido‐ und Pentaazadienido‐Liganden

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Triazenido and Pentaazadienido Ligands The ruthenium(II) triazenido complex [RuCl(ClC₆H₄N₃C₆H₄Cl)(p‐cymene)] ( 1 ) is obtained by the reaction of silver bis(p‐chlorphenyl)triazenid with [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ in CH₂Cl₂, and forms air stable, orange yellow crystals. It crystallizes as 1 ·CH₂Cl₂ in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with the lattice parameters a = 3134.3(3), b = 2105.7(2), c = 769.15(4) pm and Z = 8. In the diamagnetic mononuclear complex 1 the chelating triazenido ligand coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3). p‐Cymene binds η⁶ with its C₆ ring. The reaction of the etherphosphane complex [RuCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂C₄H₇O₂)₂] with 1, 3‐bis(p‐tolyl)triazenid in THF yields the complex [RuCl(tolyl‐N₃‐tolyl)(Ph₂PCH₂C₄H₇O₂)₂] ( 2 ). 2 forms monoclinic, red crystals with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1521.0(2), b = 1451.8(2), c = 2073.7(2) pm, β = 99.29(1)° and Z = 4. It is air stable and diamagnetic. The triazenide ion coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3). One of the two etherphosphane ligands is chelating and coordinates with the P atom and one O atom, while the other ligand binds in a monodentate fashion with its P atom, resulting in a coordination number of six for the Ru^II. [Ag(tolyl‐N₅‐tolyl)]₂ reacts in THF with [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)]₂ to afford the air stable, diamagnetic pentaazadienido complex [RuCl(tolyl‐N₅‐tolyl)(C₆H₆)] ( 3 ). 3 forms monoclinic, red crystals with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1462.4(1), b = 1056.51(8), c = 1371.4(1) pm, β = 114.36(1)° and Z = 4. The chelating pentaazadienido ligand coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3) at the divalent Ru atom. The benzene molecule binds η⁶ with its π system.     

(n‐Butyl­di­phenyl­phosphine)­di­chloro(η6‐p‐cymeme)­ruthenium(II)

The title ruthenium complex, [RuCl₂(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₁₆H₁₉P)], contains a monodentate (C₄H₉)PPh₂ ligand coordinated by the P atom. Coordination about the metal centre is completed by a η⁶‐p‐cymene ligand and two Cl atoms.     

Living Ring‐Opening Metathesis Polymerization of Norbornenes Containing Acetyl‐Protected Carbohydrates Using Well‐Defined Molybdenum and Ruthenium Initiators

Summary: Homopolymers and diblock copolymers that contain maltose or glucose residues have been prepared by ring‐opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene derivatives using a molybdenum–alkylidene initiator, Mo(CHCMe₂Ph)(N‐2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)(OtBu)₂ ( A ). These polymerizations took place not only in a living fashion ( = < 1.2) but also with almost quantitative initiation. Two types of ruthenium initiators, (Cy₃P)₂RuCl₂(CHPh) ( B ) and (IMesH₂)(Cy₃P)RuCl₂(CHPh) ( C ), have also been used to compare initiator performance under the same conditions.

Structures for the polymers studied here.     

High‐valent Molybdenum Imido Complexes with Tethered Olefins

Against the background of the (propene)Mo(=O)(=NH) and (allyl)Mo(=O)(=NH) surface species suggested as intermediates of the SOHIO process the potential of H₂N–C₆H₄–CH₂– CH=CH–CH₃, ( I ), for the introduction of chelating imido/olefin or imido/allyl ligands at highvalent Mo centres was tested. Reaction of I with Na₂[MoO₄] and trimethylchlorosilane yielded [Cl₂Mo(=N–C₆H₄–CH₂–CH=CH–CH₃)₂(dme)] ( 1 ), containing pendant olefinic arms. All attempts to introduce the olefin into the coordination sphere of the Mo centre failed. The same observation was made with [Cl₂Mo(=O)(=N–C₆H₄–CH₂–CH=CH–CH₃)(dme)] ( 2 ), synthesised via a commutation reaction from 1 and[(dme)Cl₂Mo(=O)₂]. Reaction of three equivalents of I with [CpMoCl_4′] yields [CpCl₂Mo(=N–C₆H₄–CH₂–CH=CH–CH₃)], ( 3 ), again with a pendant olefin arm; the products of experiments aiming at coordinating it to the Mo atom eluded isolation. I thus does not seem suitable for the synthesis of complexes with imido/olefin or imido/allyl ligands. However, products 1 – 3 , (two of which ( 1 , 3 ) were also characterised by single crystal X‐ray diffraction) are nevertheless interesting, e.g., with respect to the grafting of molybdenum complexes on the surfaces of solid supports to obtain heterogeneous oxidation catalysts.     

Synthese und Struktur der Komplexe [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐RuCl2(C6H6)] und [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)]

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Complexes [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] and [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)] The heteronuclear complex [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] ( 1 ) is obtained by the reaction of [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] with [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)]₂ in C₆H₅CN in form of red crystals with the composition 1 ·C₆H₅CN crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a =1149.77(8), b = 3085.9(3), c = 1172.1(1) pm, β = 104.766(9)° and Z = 4. In the dinuclear complex the complex fragment [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] is connected by an asymmetric nitrido bridge with the nitrido complex [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃]. The nitrido bridge is characterised by a bond angle Re‐N‐Ru of 170.6(3)° and distances Re‐N = 170.2(5) and Ru‐N = 199.0(5) pm. The reaction of [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] with [RhCl(COD)]₂ in benzonitrile yields orange crystals of [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)] ( 2 ) with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1522.3(2), b = 1274.85(4), c = 1921.2(2) pm, β = 106.759(7)° and Z = 4. The monovalent Rh atom exhibits a square planar coordination with the two π‐bonds of the cycloocta‐1, 5‐diene occupying cis positions. The distances in the almost linear nitrido bridge (Re‐N‐Rh = 174.8(4)°>) are Re‐N = 172.2(6) pm and Rh‐N = 195.6(6) pm.     

Crystallographic report: [N,N′‐Bis‐(6‐methylpyrid‐2‐ylium)‐(1R,2R)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane] bis‐[(p‐cymene)‐ trichlororuthenate(II)]

The chiral compound (H₂cydiampy)[RuCl₃(p‐cymene)]₂ has been obtained in high yield by treating [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ with an excess of hydrochloric acid in the presence of one equivalent of N,N′‐bis‐(6‐methylpyrid‐2‐yl)‐(1R,2R)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane (cydiampy). It crystallizes in the chiral tetragonal space group P4₃2₁2, with half of the atoms of the dication related to the other half by a crystallographic C₂ axis that also makes equivalent the two anionic metal moieties. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

trans‐Di­chloro(1,5,9,13‐tetra­methyl‐1,5,9,13‐tetr­aza­cyclo­hexa­decane‐κ4N)ruthenium(III) triiodide

In the title complex, [RuCl₂(C₁₆H₃₆N₄)]I₃, the overall symmetry of the centrosymmetric cation is approximately C_2h and the I anions are slightly asymmetric. The I?I distance is 4.313 (1) Å. The cations and the linear anions are arranged in alternate layers and thus form the intercalating structure.     

Synthesis and structures of ruthenium di‐ and tricarbonyl complexes derived from 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one

Carbon monoxide (CO) has recently been shown to impart beneficial effects in mammalian physiology and considerable research attention is now being directed toward metal–carbonyl complexes as a means of delivering CO to biological targets. Two ruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely trans‐dicarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κ²N,N′)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₂], (1), and fac‐tricarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κN)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₃], (2), have been isolated and structurally characterized. In the case of complex (1), the trans‐directing effect of the CO ligands allows bidentate coordination of the 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one (dafo) ligand despite a larger bite distance between the N‐donor atoms. In complex (2), the cis disposition of two chloride ligands restricts the ability of the dafo molecule to bind ruthenium in a bidentate fashion. Both complexes exhibit well defined ¹H NMR spectra confirming the diamagnetic ground state of Ru^II and display a strong absorption band around 300 nm in the UV.     

Rare‐Earth‐Metal–Hydrocarbyl Complexes Bearing Linked Cyclopentadienyl or Fluorenyl Ligands: Synthesis,Catalyzed Styrene Polymerization,and Structure–Reactivity Relationship

A series of rare‐earth‐metal–hydrocarbyl complexes bearing N‐type functionalized cyclopentadienyl (Cp) and fluorenyl (Flu) ligands were facilely synthesized. Treatment of [Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with equimolar amount of the electron‐donating aminophenyl‐Cp ligand C₅Me₄H‐C₆H₄‐o‐NMe₂ afforded the corresponding binuclear monoalkyl complex [({C₅Me₄‐C₆H₄‐o‐NMe(μ‐CH₂)}Y{CH₂SiMe₃})₂] ( 1 a ) via alkyl abstraction and C? H activation of the NMe₂ group. The lutetium bis(allyl) complex [(C₅Me₄‐C₆H₄‐o‐NMe₂)Lu(η³‐C₃H₅)₂] ( 2 b ), which contained an electron‐donating aminophenyl‐Cp ligand, was isolated from the sequential metathesis reactions of LuCl₃ with (C₅Me₄‐C₆H₄‐o‐NMe₂)Li (1 equiv) and C₃H₅MgCl (2 equiv). Following a similar procedure, the yttrium‐ and scandium–bis(allyl) complexes, [(C₅Me₄‐C₅H₄N)Ln(η³‐C₃H₅)₂] (Ln=Y ( 3 a ), Sc ( 3 b )), which also contained electron‐withdrawing pyridyl‐Cp ligands, were also obtained selectively. Deprotonation of the bulky pyridyl‐Flu ligand (C₁₃H₉‐C₅H₄N) by [Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] generated the rare‐earth‐metal–dialkyl complexes, [(η³‐C₁₃H₈‐C₅H₄N)Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(thf)] (Ln=Y ( 4 a ), Sc ( 4 b ), Lu ( 4 c )), in which an unusual asymmetric η³‐allyl bonding mode of Flu moiety was observed. Switching to the bidentate yttrium–trisalkyl complex [Y(CH₂C₆H₄‐o‐NMe₂)₃], the same reaction conditions afforded the corresponding yttrium bis(aminobenzyl) complex [(η³‐C₁₃H₈‐C₅H₄N)Y(CH₂C₆H₄‐o‐NMe₂)₂] ( 5 ). Complexes 1 – 5 were fully characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR and X‐ray spectroscopy, and by elemental analysis. In the presence of both [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄] and AliBu₃, the electron‐donating aminophenyl‐Cp‐based complexes 1 and 2 did not show any activity towards styrene polymerization. In striking contrast, upon activation with [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄] only, the electron‐withdrawing pyridyl‐Cp‐based complexes 3 , in particular scandium complex 3 b , exhibited outstanding activitiy to give perfectly syndiotactic (rrrr >99 %) polystyrene, whereas their bulky pyridyl‐Flu analogues ( 4 and 5 ) in combination with [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄] and AliBu₃ displayed much‐lower activity to afford syndiotactic‐enriched polystyrene.     

Crystallization experiments with the dinuclear chelate ring complex di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[(η2‐2‐allyl‐4‐methoxy‐5‐{[(propan‐2‐yloxy)carbonyl]methoxy}phenyl‐κC1)platinum(II)]

Crystallization experiments with the dinuclear chelate ring complex di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[(η²‐2‐allyl‐4‐methoxy‐5‐{[(propan‐2‐yloxy)carbonyl]methoxy}phenyl‐κC¹)platinum(II)], [Pt₂(C₁₅H₁₉O₄)₂Cl₂], containing a derivative of the natural compound eugenol as ligand, have been performed. Using five different sets of crystallization conditions resulted in four different complexes which can be further used as starting compounds for the synthesis of Pt complexes with promising anticancer activities. In the case of vapour diffusion with the binary chloroform–diethyl ether or methylene chloride–diethyl ether systems, no change of the molecular structure was observed. Using evaporation from acetonitrile (at room temperature), dimethylformamide (DMF, at 313 K) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, at 313 K), however, resulted in the displacement of a chloride ligand by the solvent, giving, respectively, the mononuclear complexes (acetonitrile‐κN)(η²‐2‐allyl‐4‐methoxy‐5‐{[(propan‐2‐yloxy)carbonyl]methoxy}phenyl‐κC¹)chloridoplatinum(II) monohydrate, [Pt(C₁₅H₁₉O₄)Cl(CH₃CN)]·H₂O, (η²‐2‐allyl‐4‐methoxy‐5‐{[(propan‐2‐yloxy)carbonyl]methoxy}phenyl‐κC¹)chlorido(dimethylformamide‐κO)platinum(II), [Pt(C₁₅H₁₉O₄)Cl(C₂H₇NO)], and (η²‐2‐allyl‐4‐methoxy‐5‐{[(propan‐2‐yloxy)carbonyl]methoxy}phenyl‐κC¹)chlorido(dimethyl sulfoxide‐κS)platinum(II), determined as the analogue {η²‐2‐allyl‐4‐methoxy‐5‐[(ethoxycarbonyl)methoxy]phenyl‐κC¹}chlorido(dimethyl sulfoxide‐κS)platinum(II), [Pt(C₁₄H₁₇O₄)Cl(C₂H₆OS)]. The crystal structures confirm that acetonitrile interacts with the Pt^II atom via its N atom, while for DMSO, the S atom is the coordinating atom. For the replacement, the longest of the two Pt—Cl bonds is cleaved, leading to a cis position of the solvent ligand with respect to the allyl group. The crystal packing of the complexes is characterized by dimer formation via C—H…O and C—H…π interactions, but no π–π interactions are observed despite the presence of the aromatic ring.     

Encapsulation of Triphenylene Derivatives in the Hexanuclear Arene Ruthenium Metallo‐Prismatic Cage [Ru6(p‐PriC6H4Me)6(tpt)2(dhbq)3]6+ (tpt = 2,4,6‐tri(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine,dhbq = 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinonato)

A large cationic triangular metallo‐prism, [Ru₆(p‐PrⁱC₆H₄Me)₆(tpt)₂(dhbq)₃]⁶⁺ ( 1 )⁶⁺, incorporating p‐cymene ruthenium building blocks, bridged by 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinonato (dhbq) ligands, and connected by two 2,4,6‐tri(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tpt) subunits, allows the permanent encapsulation of the triphenylene derivatives hexahydroxytriphenylene, C₁₈H₆(OH)₆ and hexamethoxytriphenylene, C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆. These two cationic carceplex systems [C₁₈H₆(OH)₆⊂ 1 ]⁶⁺ and [C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆⊂ 1 ]⁶⁺ have been isolated as their triflate salts. The molecular structure of these systems has been established by one‐dimensional ¹H ROESY NMR experiments as well as by the single‐crystal structure analysis of [C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆⊂ 1 ][O₃SCF₃]₆.     

Chloro­bis­(di­methyl­amido)(η5‐2,5‐di­methyl­pyrrolyl)­titanium(IV), [Ti(NMe2)2(DMP)Cl]

The structure of the title compound, [Ti(C₂H₆N)₂(C₆H₈N)Cl], displays a η⁵‐coordination mode for the pyrrolyl ring, confirmed by the values of the slip parameter [0.073 (9) Å] and the fold angle [4.6 (6)°]. This coordination is confirmed by NMR data, which point to the involvement of the complex in a fluxional process in solution above 285 K, passing through an intermediate involving simultaneously a metal–aza­allyl and a metal–olefin bond.     

Ion Pairing and Salt Structure in Organic Salts through Diffusion,Overhauser, DFT and X‐ray Methods

Pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) diffusion characteristics for a) the new [brucinium][X] salts 6 a – f [ a : X=BF₄^?; b : X=PF₆^?; c : X=MeSO₃^?, d : X=CF₃SO₃^?; e : X=BArF^?; f : X=PtCl₃(C₂H₄)^?], b) 4‐tert‐butyl‐N‐benzyl analogue, 7 and c) the aryl carbocations (p‐R‐C₆H₄)₂CH 9 a (R=CH₃O) and 9 b (R=(CH₃)₂N), (p‐CH₃O‐C₆H₄)_xCPh_3?x⁺ 10 a – c (x=1–3, respectively) and (p‐R‐C₆H₄)₃C⁺ 11 (R=(CH₃)₂N) and 12 (R=H) all in several different solvents, are reported. The solvent dependence suggests strong ion pairing in CDCl₃, intermediate ion pairing in CD₂Cl₂ and little ion pairing in [D₆]acetone. ¹H, ¹⁹F HOESY NMR spectra (HOESY: heteronuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy) for 6 and 7 reveal a specific approach of the anion with respect to the brucinium cation plus subtle changes, which are related to the anion itself. Further, for carbocations 9 – 12 , (all as BF₄^? salts) based on the NOE results, one finds marked changes in the relative positions of the BF₄^? anion. In these aryl cationic species the anion can be located either a) very close to the carbonium ion carbon b) in an intermediate position or c) proximate to the N or O atom of the p‐substituent and remote from the formally positive C atom. This represents the first example of such a positional dependence of an anion on the structure of the carbocation. DFT calculations support the experimental HOESY results. The solid‐state structures for 6 c and the novel Zeise's salt derivative, [brucinium][PtCl₃(C₂H₄)], 6 f , are reported. Analysis of ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR and other NMR measurements suggest that the η²‐C₂H₄ bonding to the platinum centre in 6 f is very similar to that found in K[PtCl₃(C₂H₄)]. Field dependent T₁ measurements on [brucinium][PtCl₃(C₂H₄)] and K[PtCl₃(C₂H₄)], are reported and suggested to be useful in recognizing aggregation effects.     

Rhodium‐ and ruthenium‐complex‐catalyzed condensation of ferrocene‐containing dithiols and diols with diarylsilanes to give silaferrocenophanes and ferrocene polymers

1,1′‐Ferrocenedithiol reacts with di(4‐methoxyphenyl)silane, diphenylsilane, and di(4‐fluorophenyl)silane in the presence of RhCl(PPh₃)₃ catalyst to give mixtures of 2,2‐diaryl‐1,3‐dithia‐2‐sila[3]ferrocenophanes (1a–3a) and ? (Fc? S? SiAr₂? S) _n? (Fc = 1,1′‐ferrocenylene; 1b: Ar = C₆H₄OMe‐4; 2b: Ar = Ph; 3b: Ar = C₆H₄F‐4). The products are isolated and characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The polymers 1b–3b, obtained from a toluene‐soluble fraction of the products, show GPC elution patterns corresponding to M_n values of 2700–4600 (polystyrene standards). The UV–vis spectra of the ferrocenophanes and polymers exhibit a d–d transition peak at about 440 nm, while the polymers show a π–π* transition peak at 320–330 nm. The cyclic voltammograms of 3a (Ar = C₆H₄F ? 4) and 3b show a reversible redox of the iron center at 0.27 V and 0.35 V (Ag⁺/Ag) respectively. Reaction of 1,1′‐ferrocenedimethanol with diphenylsilane in the presence of RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ catalyst results in selective formation of 3,3‐diphenyl‐2,4‐dioxa‐3‐sila[5]ferrocenophane ( 4 ), whose structure was determined by X‐ray crystallography. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.