Weak Value,Quasiprobability and Bohmian Mechanics

We clarify the significance of quasiprobability (QP) in quantum mechanics that is relevant in describing physical quantities associated with a transition process. Our basic quantity is Aharonov’s weak value, from which the QP can be defined up to a certain ambiguity parameterized by a complex number. Unlike the conventional probability, the QP allows us to treat two noncommuting observables consistently, and this is utilized to embed the QP in Bohmian mechanics such that its equivalence to quantum mechanics becomes more transparent. We also show that, with the help of the QP, Bohmian mechanics can be recognized as an ontological model with a certain type of contextuality.     

Contextuality in Classical Physics and Its Impact on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

It is shown that the hallmark quantum phenomenon of contextuality is present in classical statistical mechanics (CSM). It is first shown that the occurrence of contextuality is equivalent to there being observables that can differentiate between pure and mixed states. CSM is formulated in the formalism of quantum mechanics (FQM), a formulation commonly known as the Koopman–von Neumann formulation (KvN). In KvN, one can then show that such a differentiation between mixed and pure states is possible. As contextuality is a probabilistic phenomenon and as it is exhibited in both classical physics and ordinary quantum mechanics (OQM), it is concluded that the foundational issues regarding quantum mechanics are really issues regarding the foundations of probability.     

也谈一维无限深势阱内粒子(基态)的动量概率分布

对一维无限深热阱内粒子（基态）动量的概率分布的两种不同结论进行了详细分析，认为该问题实质是近代量子力学基本理论中本质困难的反映。这就是说，本用数学方法证明了量子力学的基本假设中存在着逻辑矛盾。     

The theoretical apparatus of semantic realism: A new language for classical and quantum physics

The standard interpretation of quantum physics (QP) and some recent generalizations of this theory rest on the adoption of a rerificationist theory of truth and meaning, while most proposals for modifying and interpreting QP in a realistic way attribute an ontological status to theoretical physical entities (ontological realism). Both terms of this dichotomy are criticizable, and many quantum paradoxes can be attributed to it. We discuss a new viewpoint in this paper (semantic realism, or briefly SR), which applies both to classical physics (CP) and to QP. and is characterized by the attempt of giving up verificationism without adopting ontological realism. As a first step, we construct a formalized observative language L endowed with a correspondence truth theory. Then, we state a set of axioms by means of L which hold both in CP and in QP. and construct a further language L_v which can express bothtestable andtheoretical properties of a given physical system. The concepts ofmeaning andtestability do not collapse in L and L_e hence we can distinguish between semantic and pragmatic compatibility of physical properties and define the concepts of testability and conjoint testability of statements of L and L_e. In this context a new metatheoretical principle (MGP) is stated, which limits the validity of empirical physical laws. By applying SR (in particular. MGP) to QP, one can interpret quantum logic as a theory of testability in QP, show that QP is semantically incomplete, and invalidate the widespread claim that contextuality is unavoidable in QP. Furthermore. SR introduces some changes in the conventional interpretation of ideal measurements and Heisenbergs uncertainty principle.     

Quantum physics as a particular domain of probabilistic physics

Quantum physics (QP) is meant as a whole science having both theoretical and experimental parts. The subjects of these parts in any science are entirely different. The experimental part deals with really existing particular objects (concrete objects), whereas the theoretical part refers to the so-calledabstract objects which are used in our considerations only. The necessity of a strict distinction between concrete and abstract objects is a crucialkey methodological principle (KMP). This principle allows one to construct the science of probability (probabilistics) whose theoretical and experimental parts are, respectively,probability theory andexperimental statistics, Probabilistics suggests two methods of solving probabilistic problems: theclassical method and thequantum approach. The application of probabilistics to physics leads toprobabilistic physics, whose two interconnected particular domains,classical statistical physics (CSP) and QP, result, respectively, from the treatment of macrosystems by the classical method and of microsystems by the quantum approach. The mathematical peculiarities of QP stem from the pertinent ones in probabilistics itself. Having been constructed as a particular domain of probabilistic physics, QP needs no artificial interpretation. Many quantum-related issues and paradoxes are thereby easily settled.     

On the structure of the quantum-mechanical probability models

In this paper the role of the mathematical probability models in the classical and quantum physics is shortly analyzed. In particular the formal structure of the quantum probability spaces (QPS) is contrasted with the usual Kolmogorovian models of probability by putting in evidence the connections between this structure and the fundamental principles of the quantum mechanics. The fact that there is no unique Kolmogorovian model reproducing a QPS is recognized as one of the main reasons of the paradoxical behaviors pointed out in the quantum theory from its early days.Paper written in honor of L. de Broglie.     

Communication Complexity as a Principle of Quantum Mechanics

We introduce a two-party communication complexity problem in which the probability of success by using a particular strategy allows the parties to detect with certainty whether or not some forbidden communication has taken place. We show that theprobability of success is bounded by nature; any conceivable method which gives a probability of success outside these bounds is impossible. Moreover, any conceivable method to solve the problem which gives a probability success within these bounds is possible in nature. This example suggests that a suitaby chosen set of communication complexity problems could be the basis of an information-theoretic axiomatization of quantum mechanics.     

量子Zeno效应新论

本文根据量子力学的基本原理和量子测量理论给出了量子Ｚｅｎｏ效应的简要证明，阐明了该效应的物理基础，指出了该效应与系统ＣＰ破坏的关联。     

Fundamental Problems in the Unification of Physics

We discuss the following problems, plaguing the present search for the “final theory”: (1) How to find a mathematical structure rich enough to be suitably approximated by the mathematical structures of general relativity and quantum mechanics? (2) How to reconcile nonlocal phenomena of quantum mechanics with time honored causality and reality postulates? (3) Does the collapse of the wave function contain some hints concerning the future quantum gravity theory? (4) It seems that the final theory cannot avoid the problem of dynamics, and consequently the problem of time. What kind of time, if this theory is supposed to be background free? (5) Will the dynamics of the “final theory” be probabilistic? Quantum probability exhibits some essential differences as compared with classical probability; are they but variations of some more general probabilistic measure theory? (6) Do we need a radically new interpretation of quantum mechanics, or rather an entirely new theory of which the present quantum mechanics is an approximation? (7) If the final theory is to be background free, it should provide a mechanism of space-time generation. Should we try to explain not only the generation of space-time, but also the generation of its material content? (8) As far as the existence of the initial singularity is concerned, one usually expects either “yes” or “not” answers from the final theory. However, if the mathematical structure of the future theory is supposed to be truly more general that the mathematical structures of the present general relativity and quantum mechanics, is a “third answer“ possible? Could this third answer be related to the probabilistic character of the final theory? We discuss these questions in the framework of a working model unifying gravity and quanta. The analysis reveals unexpected aspects of these rather wildly discussed issues.     

Amplitude phase-space model for quantum mechanics

We show that there is a close relationship between quantum mechanics and ordinary probability theory. The main difference is that in quantum mechanics the probability is computed in terms of an amplitude function, while in probability theory a probability distribution is used. Applying this idea, we then construct an amplitude model for quantum mechanics on phase space. In this model, states are represented by amplitude functions and observables are represented by functions on phase space. If we now postulate a conjugation condition, the model provides the same predictions as conventional quantum mechanics. In particular, we obtain the usual quantum marginal probabilities, conditional probabilities and expectations. The commutation relations and uncertainty principle also follow. Moreover Schrödinger's equation is shown to be an averaged version of Hamilton's equation in classical mechanics.     

On the Quantum Probability Flux Through Surfaces

We remark that the often ignored quantum probability current is fundamental for a genuine understanding of scattering phenomena and, in particular, for the statistics of the time and position of the first exit of a quantum particle from a given region, which may be simply expressed in terms of the current. This simple formula for these statistics does not appear as such in the literature. It is proposed that the formula, which is very different from the usual quantum mechanical measurement formulas, be verified experimentally. A full understanding of the quantum current and the associated formula is provided by Bohmian mechanics.     

Quantum Interference and Many Worlds: A New Family of Classical Analogies

We present a new way of constructing classical analogies of quantum interference. These analogies share one common factor: they treat closed loops as fundamental entities. Such analogies can be used to understand the difference between quantum and classical probability; they can also be used to illuminate the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. An examination of these analogies suggests that closed loops (particularly closed loops in time) may have special significance in interpretations of quantum interference, because they allow probabilities to remain classically additive.     

On Decaying Rate of Quantum States

The survival amplitude of a quantum state (wave function) under the Schrödinger evolution can be expressed as the Fourier transform of the probability density induced by the wave function in the energy representation. In particular, the first zero of the survival amplitude is a fundamental quantity in characterizing the decaying rate of the quantum state. A basic problem in quantum mechanics is to study how fast the survival amplitude can fall. We present a general estimation of the decaying rate of a quantum state in terms of a moment of any order. The result is established by integrating an inequality which involves controlling trigonometric sums by power functions. This inequality is of independent interest in estimating exponential sums.     

Quantum correlations from local amplitudes and the resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen nonlocality puzzle

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) nonlocality puzzle has been recognized as one of the most important unresolved issues in the foundational aspects of quantum mechanics. We show that the problem is more or less entirely resolved, if the quantum correlations are calculated directly from local quantities, which preserve the phase information in the quantum system. We assume strict locality for the probability amplitudes instead of local realism for the outcomes and calculate an amplitude correlation function. Then the experimentally observed correlation of outcomes is calculated from the square of the amplitude correlation function. Locality of amplitudes implies that measurement on one particle does not collapse the companion particle to a definite state. Apart from resolving the EPR puzzle, this approach shows that the physical interpretation of apparently “nonlocal” effects, such as quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping, are different from what is usually assumed. Bell-type measurements do not change distant states. Yet the correlations are correctly reproduced, when measured, if complex probability amplitudes are treated as the basic local quantities. As examples, we derive the quantum correlations of two-particle maximally entangled states and the three-particle Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangled state.     

The reflection phenomenon and complexity engine as statistical physics tools for the advanced evolution phenomenon

We intend to uncover generative principles for complex, biological systems, looking the reflections as well as the analogs of decision making property in quantum physics: measurement, self-interaction of the electron, Berry phase and quantum anomalies. We assume that classical analogs of the mentioned phenomena could be related to the evolvability, growing of complexity and decision making in biological systems. The reflection is a map (coarse graining) from microscopic motions to a macroscopic scale that relates with a free-energy cost and is often accompanied by the emergence of order-parameters. In this context we identify the self-reflection phenomenon, which is exemplified by cognition, information transfer near the error threshold, and tightly related evolution-ecology phenomena. We propose that complex systems that have similar reflection structure are to be described by similar mathematical tools including stochastic (information) thermodynamics and the large deviation theory. We introduce the concept of complexity engine: the group of two (or more) autonomous features of complex systems that are in a partial conflict with each other. Analogues of this are wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics and data-program duality in digital life. We formulate a fundamental problem: does the three-dimensional space provide a complexity engine for the emergence of life?     

Do Quantum States Evolve? Apropos of Marchildon's Remarks

Marchildon's (favorable) assessment (Foundations of Physics, foregoing paper) of the Pondicherry interpretation of quantum mechanics raises several issues, which are addressed. Proceeding from the assumption that quantum mechanics is fundamentally a probability algorithm, this interpretation determines the nature of a world that is irreducibly described by this probability algorithm. Such a world features an objective fuzziness, which implies that its spatiotemporal differentiation does not go all the way down. This result is inconsistent with the existence of an evolving instantaneous state, quantum or otherwise.     

CPT-Frames for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Based on the P T-symmetric quantum theory,the concepts of P T-frame,P T-symmetric operator and CPT-frame on a Hilbert space K and for an operator on K are proposed.It is proved that the spectrum and point spectrum of a P T-symmetric linear operator are both symmetric with respect to the real axis and the eigenvalues of an unbroken P T-symmetric operator are real.For a linear operator H on Cd,it is proved that H has unbroken P Tsymmetry if and only if it has d diferent eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenstates are eigenstates of P T.Given a C P T-frame on K,a new positive inner product on K is induced and called C P T-inner product.Te relationship between the CP T-adjoint and the Dirac adjoint of a densely defined linear operator is derived,and it is proved that an operator which has a bounded CP T-frame is CP T-Hermitian if and only if it is T-symmetric,in that case,it is similar to a Hermitian operator.The existence of an operator C consisting of a CP T-frame is discussed.These concepts and results will serve a mathematical discussion about P T-symmetric quantum mechanics.