Comparison of membrane assisted solvent extraction,stir bar sorptive extraction,and solid phase microextraction in analysis of tetramine in food

Three environmentally friendly extraction techniques, membrane assisted solvent extraction (MASE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and headspace solid phase microextraction (HS‐SPME), were compared for the direct analysis of the highly toxic rodenticide tetramine in food. The optimized MASE method was applied to seven foods fortified with tetramine and compared to previously reported SBSE and HS‐SPME results. Parameters such as the standard addition linearity (MASE (0.964–0.999), SBSE (0.966–0.999), HS‐SPME (0.955–0.999)), recovery (MASE (12–86%), SBSE (36–130%), HS‐SPME (50–200%)), reproducibility (MASE (3.0–30%), SBSE (4.4–9.6%), HS‐SPME (1–12%)), and LOD (MASE (1.6–6.4 ng/g), SBSE (0.2–2.1 ng/g), HS‐SPME (0.9–4.3 ng/g)) were compared.     

Stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of tetramethylene disulfotetramine in food: Method development and comparison to solid-phase microextraction

A stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SBSE-GC-MS) method for the determination of tetramethylene disulfotetramine is presented. The limits of detection (LOD) of the optimized method was 0.2 ng g⁻¹ for extractions from water and 0.3-2.1 ng g⁻¹ for extractions from foods. Recovery was highly matrix dependent (36-130%) and quantification required standard addition calibrations. Standard addition calibration lines had high linearity (R² > 0.97) and replicate extractions had good reproducibility (R.S.D. = 4.4-9.8%). A comparison of the SBSE method and a previously developed headspace (HS)-solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method was performed. Generally, SBSE provided higher sensitivity with decreased analysis time.     

Optimisation of stir bar sorptive extraction applied to the determination of volatile compounds in vinegars

Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) was evaluated for analysing volatile compounds in vinegar. The extraction and desorption analytical conditions have been optimised using a two-level factorial design expanded further to a central composite design. This chemometric tool is very appropriate in screening experiments where the aim is to investigate several possibly influential and/or interacting factors. For the extraction step, the optimum analytical conditions were: sample volume 25 ml without dilution, sampling time 120 min, NaCl content 5.85 g, and stirring speed 1250 rpm. For the desorption step, the optimised analytical conditions were: desorption temperature 300 degrees C, cryofocusing temperature -140 degrees C, flow of helium 75 ml min(-1), and desorption time 10 min. The SBSE procedure developed shows detection limits, and linear ranges adequate for analysing this type of compounds. The repeatability values obtained were lower than 10%. SBSE is a very simple, solvent-free, fast technique with better sensitivities, in general, than SPME. However, a disadvantage of this technique is that, up to now, the stir bar offers a limited enrichment capability for polar compounds because is only available with PDMS coating.     

Stir bar sorptive extraction for the analysis of wine cork taint

A magnetic stir bar with a polydimethylsiloxane coating was used to absorb 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, 2,3,4,5-tetrachloroanisole, pentachloroanisole and their respective phenols from synthetic and real wine samples. The stir bar sorptive extraction method was optimised to obtain the best extraction conditions in terms of temperature, time, pH and NaCl addition. The stir bar was desorbed in a thermal desorption system coupled to a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. The method proposed showed good linearity over the concentration range tested and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.96 to 0.99 for all the analytes. The reproducibility and repeatability of the method was estimated between 1.29 and 4.02%. With no a pre-concentration step and with a much reduced analysis time, all the analyzed compounds showed detection and quantification limits that were lower than those observed with other methods found in the bibliography. Except for pentachlorophenol due to its poor absorptivity in polydimethysiloxane, in red wines, LOD ranged between 7.56 and 61.56 pg/l, and LOQ ranged between 17.21 and 205.11 pg/l; while in white wines, the LOD ranged between 5.82 and 30.50 pg/l and LOQ ranged between 19.41 and 101.61 pg/l. These concentrations were always lower than their respective olfactory thresholds values.     

搅拌棒吸附萃取技术与GC-MS联用测定苹果酒挥发性物质

研究了检测苹果酒中挥发性物质的一种新方法—搅拌棒吸附萃取(简称SBSE)气质联用技术。对搅拌速度、搅拌时间、温度及加盐量对搅拌棒萃取效果的影响进行了研究。萃取条件为:10 mL苹果酒样加入3 g NaCl,于55℃下以1100 r/min的转速搅拌60 min。搅拌棒萃取出了苹果酒中80种挥发性物质,对其中的49种物质进行了定量。该方法具有良好的线性,所有标准曲线的线性相关系数均大于0.99。方法检出限为0.01~6.37μg/L,定量限为0.03~21.25μg/L,回收率在70.9%~111.4%之间,相对标准偏差均在10%以内。     

Stir bar sorptive extraction applied to the determination of dicarboximide fungicides in wine

The dicarboximide fungicides vinclozolin, iprodione and procymidone were analyzed in white wines using stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) in combination with thermal desorption-capillary GC-MS analysis (TD-cGC-MS). The method was optimized using spiked water samples in a concentration range between 0.5 and 100 microg/l. Iprodione was measured as its degradation product 3,5-dichlorophenyl hydantoin. Limits of quantification in the full scan MS mode are 0.5 microg/l for vinclozolin and procymidone and 5 microg/l for iprodione. In the ion monitoring mode, concentrations 100 times lower can be dosed. Because of wine matrix effects on the recoveries, quantification of the target fungicides in wine had to be carried out by standard addition. For the thermolabile iprodione, the accuracy of SBSE-TD-cGC-MS was verified using SBSE followed by liquid desorption and analysis by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectroscopy. Procymidone and iprodione were detected in wines in concentrations up to 65 microg/l while the highest concentration of vinclozolin detected was smaller than 3 microg/l.     

Optimization and validation of headspace sorptive extraction for the analysis of volatile compounds in wine vinegars

Quantification of aroma compounds in wine vinegars is challenging due to the complexity of the matrix and the low concentrations expected. A method for the determination of volatile compounds in wine vinegars employing headspace sorptive extraction-thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HSSE-TD-GC-MS) was developed. A central composite design was used to optimize the sampling condition. The proposed method was successfully validated and low detection and quantification limits was obtained. The application of the proposed methodology allows the determination of 53 compounds in different wine vinegars (red, Sherry). Five of them have been detected in wine vinegars for the first time.     

Sampling volatile organic compounds using a modified solid phase microextraction device

Headspace solid phase microextraction (headspace SPME) has been demonstrated to be an excellent solvent-free sampling method. One of the major factors contributing to the success of headspace SPME is the concentrating effect of the fiber coating toward organic compounds. The affinity of the fiber coating toward very volatile analytes, such as chloromethane, may, however, not be large enough for detection at the parts per trillion concentration level. Static headspace analysis, on the other hand, is very effective for these very volatile compounds. As analyte volatility decreases, the sensitivity of static headspace analysis drops. The complementary nature of these two sampling methods can be exploited by combining the SPME device with a gastight syringe. The sensitivity of the new sampling device is better than that of SPME for very volatile compounds or that of static headspace analysis for less volatile compounds. This new method can sample a wide range of compounds from chloromethane (b.p. −24°C) to bromoform (b.p. 149°C) with estimated limits of detection at the low parts per trillion level.     

Development of a stir bar sorptive extraction method for the determination of volatile compounds in orange juices

A stir bar sorptive extraction method for the determination of volatile compounds in orange juices was developed. The extraction variables were optimized using a reduced two‐level factorial screening design (2^5‐1), and the most suitable analytical conditions for the extraction of the studied compounds were: sample volume 10 mL, extraction time 60 min, stirring speed 1800 rpm, NaCl amount 30% (weight/volume), and twister length 10 mm. The optimized method was further validated, obtaining good linearity and detection and quantification limits low enough to correctly determine the studied compounds. As well, for most of the studied compounds precision and recovery values were good. Several orange juice samples (squeezed and commercial) were extracted following the optimized extraction method and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection. The method has proven to be suitable for the determination of the aroma of orange juice, of which limonene was the major volatile compound in all the studied samples.     

Coupling of stir bar sorptive extraction with single photon ionization mass spectrometry for determination of volatile organic compounds in water

A home-made stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) apparatus was combined to a single photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (SPI-TOFMS) for rapid and sensitive determination of trace volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water. The home-made SBSE bar, low-cost and disposable, was used for VOCs extraction. A thermal desorption (TD) device was designed to desorb the analytes from the SBSE bar, and a high throughput interface was developed to transfer the analytes into the ionization chamber of the SPI-TOFMS. The combination of large extraction volume of SBSE bar, and the direct measurement power of SPI-TOFMS enable a short analysis time for VOCs in water with high sensitivity, for example the limits of detection (LODs) were in the range of 7.4-11.1 ng L(-1) for benzene, toluene, and p-xylene (BTX) within 15 min. BTX aqueous solutions were chosen to demonstrate the quantitative capability, the linear range was from 0.05 to 100 μg L(-1) and the correlation coefficients were better than 0.996. The proposed method was successfully applied for the analysis of VOCs in urban river water.     

Analysis of volatiles of malt whisky by solid-phase microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction

Blended Scotch whisky was analysed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) to study the composition of the volatiles. For SPME analysis, three different fibres were compared, poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) (100 microm). poly(acrylate) (PA) (85 microm) and divinylbenzene-Carboxen on poly(dimethylsiloxane) (DVB-CAR-(PDMS) (50/30 microm). It was found that the PDMS and DVB-CAR-PDMS fibres showed a higher enrichment capacity than PA as well as a better reproducibility. The influence of sampling time, temperature and salt addition on the enrichment of volatiles as well as the difference between liquid and headspace SPME were studied. An optimum SPME method was developed. Finally a more recent sample preparation technique, namely SBSE was evaluated to extract whisky volatiles.     

Rapid determination of volatile organic compounds in environmentally hazardous wastewaters using solid phase microextraction

Solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) was applied to the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in wastewater discharges. Environmentally significant samples, typical of those subject to regulatory control, were examined and included discharges from pharmaceutical, petrochemical and municipal sewerage treatment plants. Analysis was performed using gas chromatography – mass spectrometry (GC-MS) following sampling using headspace or immersion SPME. Fused silica fibres, coated with either poly(dimethylsiloxane) or poly(acrylate), were examined to determine VOC which included chloroform, saturated carboxylic acids, alkylbenzenes, phenol, benzonitrile and benzofuran. Detection limits varied from 10 to 170 ng/ml and satisfactory relative standard deviations (%RSD < 10) were obtained. For most samples, headspace sampling was preferred to immersion. SPME was found to be a useful technique for the rapid screening of wastewaters for VOC.     

The determination of volatile organic compounds in soils using solid phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) was applied in the development of a protocol for the analysis of a number of target organic compounds in landfill site samples. The selected analytes, including aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbous, and unsaturated compounds, were absorbed directly from a headspace sample above a soil layer onto a fused silica fiber. Following exposure, the fiber was thermally desorbed in the injection port of the gas chromatograph and eluted compounds were detected using a mass selective detector. The stability and sensitivity of the extraction technique were examined at five temperatures (22–60°C) using a 100μm polydimethylsiloxane fiber. Calibrations, using soil samples spiked with selected solvents (0.5–30 μg/g), were linear; trichloroethene (r² = 0.992) and benzene (r² = 0.998). SPME was applied to the examination of a municipal landfill where 8 sites were sampled, at three depths, resulting in the detection of xylene (maximum 2.8 μg/g) and a number of other non-target organic contaminants.     

顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用分析纺织品中挥发性有机物

建立了顶空固相微萃取（HSSPME）-气相色谱（GC）-质谱（MS）联用测定纺织品中甲苯、4-乙烯基环己烯、苯乙烯、萘和1-苯基环己烯5种挥发性有机物（VOCs）的分析方法。选择聚二甲基硅氧烷（PDMS）作为萃取涂层,优化了SPME的萃取条件,包括平衡时间、萃取时间、萃取温度、顶空体积、离子强度、搅拌速度、解吸温度和时间以及GC—MS仪器条件。对于甲苯、4-乙烯基环己烯、苯乙烯、萘和1-苯基环己烯方法线性范围分别为0．087～870、3．32～3320、2．28～2280、0．015～150和0．050～50．0ng／g;检出限分别为0．005、0．042、0．670、0．008和0．011ng／g。实际样品加标回收率在80．1％～122％之间,RSD在0．8％～8．6％之间。方法符合纺织品中痕量VOCs的快速分析要求。     

Analysis of wine primary aroma compounds by stir bar sorptive extraction

Due to the great importance of some primary aroma compounds on wine quality, these compounds which includes terpenes, C₁₃-norisoprenoids and C₆ compounds, have been analyzed by stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) followed by a thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. The stir bar sorptive extraction method was optimized in terms of temperature, time, pH and NaCl addition. The best SBSE sorption kinetics for the target analytes were obtained after submitting the solutions to 60 °C during 90 min. The addition of sodium chloride did not enhance the volatile extraction. The method proposed showed good linearity over the concentration range tested, with correlation coefficients higher than 0.98 for all the analytes. The reproducibility and repeatability of the method was estimated between 0.22 and 9.11%. The detection and quantification limits of all analytes were lower than their respective olfactory threshold values. The application of this SBSE method revealed that monovarietal white wines were clearly separated by two canonic discriminating functions when grape varieties were used as differentiating variable, the first of which explained 98.4% of the variance. The compounds which contributed most to the differentiation were limonene, linalool, nerolidol and 1-hexanol.     

Optimisation of stir bar sorptive extraction for the analysis of volatile phenols in wines

An easy, fast and reliable analytical method is proposed for the determination of the concentration of volatile phenols (ethyl- and vinylphenols) in wines. The novel stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) technique is employed, following a simple and fast procedure that allows 15 samples to be extracted simultaneously using very small sample volume. Extracts are desorbed in a thermodesorption system (TDS) coupled on-line to a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry system. The SBSE offers better recovery and linear regression coefficient (r2) for the four volatile phenols than solid-phase extraction (SPE). The mass spectrometric detection in selected ion monitoring mode contributes to the lower detection limit and good sensibility obtained with this method.     

Potentialities of two solventless extraction approaches—Stir bar sorptive extraction and headspace solid-phase microextraction for determination of higher alcohol acetates, isoamyl esters and ethyl esters in wines

A stir bar sorptive extraction with liquid desorption followed by large volume injection coupled to gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry (SBSE-LD/LVI-GC-qMS) was evaluated for the simultaneous determination of higher alcohol acetates (HAA), isoamyl esters (IsoE) and ethyl esters (EE) of fatty acids. The method performance was assessed and compared with other solventless technique, the solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in headspace mode (HS). For both techniques, influential experimental parameters were optimised to provide sensitive and robust methods. The SBSE-LD/LVI methodology was previously optimised in terms of extraction time, influence of ethanol in the matrix, liquid desorption (LD) conditions and instrumental settings. Higher extraction efficiency was obtained using 60 min of extraction time, 10% ethanol content, n-pentane as desorption solvent, 15 min for the back-extraction period, 10 mL min⁻¹ for the solvent vent flow rate and 10 °C for the inlet temperature. For HS-SPME, the fibre coated with 50/30 μm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) afforded highest extraction efficiency, providing the best sensitivity for the target volatiles, particularly when the samples were extracted at 25 °C for 60 min under continuous stirring in the presence of sodium chloride (10% (w/v)). Both methodologies showed good linearity over the concentration range tested, with correlation coefficients higher than 0.984 for HS-SPME and 0.982 for SBES-LD approach, for all analytes. A good reproducibility was attained and low detection limits were achieved using both SBSE-LD (0.03-28.96 μg L⁻¹) and HS-SPME (0.02-20.29 μg L⁻¹) methodologies. The quantification limits for SBSE-LD approach ranging from 0.11 to 96.56 μg L⁻and from 0.06 to 67.63 μg L⁻¹ for HS-SPME. Using the HS-SPME approach an average recovery of about 70% was obtained whilst by using SBSE-LD obtained average recovery were close to 80%. The analytical and procedural advantages and disadvantages of these two methods have been compared.Both analytical methods were used to determine the HAA, IsoE and EE fatty acids content in “Terras Madeirenses” table wines. A total of 16 esters were identified and quantified from the wine extracts by HS-SPME whereas by SBSE-LD technique were found 25 esters which include 2 higher alcohol acetates, 4 isoamyl esters and 19 ethyl esters of fatty acids. Generally SBSE-LD provided higher sensitivity with decreased analysis time.     

Stir bar sorptive extraction for the analysis of short‐chain chlorinated paraffins in water

An optimised method using stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and a thermal desorption‐GC‐electron capture detector (GC‐ECD) for the determination of short‐chain chlorinated paraffins from water samples was developed. Recoveries near to 100% were obtained by using 20 mm×0.5 mm (length×film thickness) PDMS commercial stir bars from 200 mL spiked water samples and 20% methanol addition with an extraction period of 24 h. Method sensitivity, linearity and precision were evaluated for surface water and wastewater spiked samples. A LOD of 0.03 and 0.04 μg/L was calculated for surface and wastewater, respectively. The precision of the method given as an RSD was below 20% for both matrices. The developed method was applied for the analysis of two real samples from a contaminated river and a wastewater treatment plant. Results were in accordance with those obtained using a previously developed method based on solid phase microextraction (SPME).     

Stir bar sorptive extraction and thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for trace analysis of triclosan in water sample

A simple and highly sensitive method called stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and thermal desorption (TD)-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which is used for the determination of trace amounts of 5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol (triclosan) in river water samples, is described. A stir bar coated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is added to a 10mL water sample and stirring is carried out for 120min at room temperature (25 degrees C) in a vial. Then, the PDMS stir bar is subjected to TD-GC-MS. The detection limit of triclosan is 5ngL(-1) (ppt). The method shows linearity over the calibration range (0.02-20mugL(-1)) and the correlation coefficient is higher than 0.997 for triclosan standard solution. The recovery of triclosan in river water samples ranges from 91.9 to 108.3% (RSD: 4.0-7.0%). This simple, accurate, sensitive, and selective analytical method may be used in the determination of trace amounts of triclosan in river water samples.