Synthesis,Structures and Reactivity of Lanthanoid(II) Formamidinates of Varying Steric Bulk

New reactive, divalent lanthanoid formamidinates [Yb(Form)₂(thf)₂] (Form=[RNCHNR]; R=o‐MeC₆H₄ (o‐TolForm; 1 ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ (XylForm; 2 ), 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂ (MesForm; 3 ), 2,6‐Et₂C₆H₃ (EtForm; 4 ), o‐PhC₆H₄ (o‐PhPhForm; 5 ), 2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ (DippForm; 6 ), o‐HC₆F₄ (TFForm; 7 )) and [Eu(DippForm)₂(thf)₂] ( 8 ) have been prepared by redox transmetallation/protolysis reactions between an excess of a lanthanoid metal, Hg(C₆F₅)₂ and the corresponding formamidine (HForm). X‐ray crystal structures of 2 – 6 and 8 show them to be monomeric with six‐coordinate lanthanoid atoms, chelating N,N′‐Form ligands and cis‐thf donors. However, [Yb(TFForm)₂(thf)₂] ( 7 ) crystallizes from THF as [Yb(TFForm)₂(thf)₃] ( 7 a ), in which ytterbium is seven coordinate and the thf ligands are “pseudo‐meridional”. Representative complexes undergo C? X (X=F, Cl, Br) activation reactions with perfluorodecalin, hexachloroethane or 1,2‐dichloroethane, and 1‐bromo‐2,3,4,5‐tetrafluorobenzene, giving [Yb(EtForm)₂F]₂ ( 9) , [Yb(o‐PhPhForm)₂F]₂ ( 10) , [Yb(o‐PhPhForm)₂Cl(thf)₂] ( 11) , [Yb(DippForm)₂Cl(thf)] ( 12) and [Yb(DippForm)₂Br(thf)] ( 16) . X‐ray crystallography has shown 9 to be a six‐coordinate, fluoride‐bridged dimer, 12 and 16 to be six‐coordinate monomers with the halide and thf ligands cis to each other, and 11 to have a seven‐coordinate Yb atom with “pseudo‐meridional” unidentate ligands and thf donors cis to each other. The analogous terbium compound [Tb(DippForm)₂Cl(thf)₂] ( 13 ), prepared by metathesis, has a similar structure to 11 . C? Br activation also accompanies the redox transmetallation/protolysis reactions between La, Nd or Yb metals, Hg(2‐BrC₆F₄)₂, and HDippForm, yielding [Ln(DippForm)₂Br(thf)] complexes (Ln=La ( 14 ), Nd ( 15 ), Yb ( 16 )).     

Investigations on organotin,organolead, lead(IV), and lead(II) dithiolates

Bis(triorganometal) 1,2-dithiolates (R₃M)₂S₂R′ [(HS)₂R′ = C₇H₈S₂ for toluene-dithiol-3,4 (H₂TDT); M = Sn, Pb; R = Ph; or (HS)₂R′ = C₁₀H₁₄S₂ for 1,2-dimethyl-4,5-bis(mercaptomethyl)benzene (H₂DBB); M = Sn, R = CH₃, C₆H₅; M = Pb, R = C₆H₅], diorganometal 1,2-dithiolates R₂MS₂R′ [(HS)₂R′ = C₆H₆S₂ for 1,2-dimercaptobenzene (H₂DMB); M = Pb, R = CH₃, C₂H₅, C₆H₅; or (HS)₂R′ = H₂TDT; M = Sn, R = CH₃, C₆H₅; M = Pb, R = C₆H₅; or (HS)₂R′ = H₂DBB; M = Sn, R = CH₃, C₆H₅; M = Pb, R = CH₃, C₂H₂, C₆H₅; or (HS)₂R′ = C₈H₆N₂S₂ for 2,3-dimercaptoquinoxaline (H₂QDT); M = Pb, R = C₆H₅] and some lead(IV) and lead(II) dithiolates Pb(S₂R′)_n [(HS)₂R′ = H₂DMB, n = 2; (HS)₂R′ = H₂TDT, n = 2; (HS)₂R′ = H₂DBB, n = 1 or 2] have been prepared. Vibrational, ¹H NMR, and Mössbauer spectroscopic data are consistent with pentacoordination of tin in R₂SnTDT and with tetracoordination of tin in R₂SnS₂R′ and (R₃Sn)₂S₂R′ in the solid state. The soluble compounds are monomeric in solution. Coupling constants for the methyltin compounds indicate tetracoordination in solution.     

Synthesis and structures of the 2-(dimethylsila)pyrimidine derivatives (Ar = Ph, C6H4Bu-4; X = H, SiMe3, Li(hmpa)2, K(thf)3; n = 1, 2)

Five crystalline 2-(dimethylsila)pyrimidine derivatives (Z) have been prepared in excellent 1–4 or satisfactory 5 yield and characterised. The source of each was ultimately Li[CH(SiMe₂R)(SiMe₂OMe)] [R = Me (B) or OMe (I)]. Compound 1 (Z with Ar = Ph, X = SiMe₃, n = 1) was obtained from Z [with Ar = Ph, X = Li(OEt₂), n = 4; previously isolated from B [P.B. Hitchcock, M.F. Lappert, X.-H. Wei, J. Organomet. Chem. 689 (2004) 1342]] and Me₃SiCl. The potassium salt 2 [Z with Ar = C₆H₄Bu^t-4; X = K(thf)₃, n = 2] was made from K[CH(SiMe₃)(SiMe₂OMe)] (C) (via B) and 4-Bu^tC₆H₄CN. Treatment of 2 with 1,2-dibromoethane afforded 3 (Z with Ar = 4-Bu^tC₆H₄; X = H, n = 1); which when reacted with successively n-butyllithium and Me₃SiCl produced 4 (Z with Ar = 4-Bu^tC₆H₄, X = SiMe₃, n = 1). Compound 5 [Z with Ar = 4-Bu^tC₆H₄, X = Li(hmpa)₂, n = 1] resulted from I with 4-Bu^tC₆H₄CN and then OP(NMe₂)₃ (≡ hmpa). Plausible reaction pathways from the appropriate alkali metal alkyl C or I to 2 or 5, respectively, are suggested; these involve regiospecific 1,3-migrations of SiMe₂OMe from C → N and electrocyclic loss of Me₃SiOMe or SiMe₂(OMe)₂, respectively. The X-ray structures of crystalline 1, 2 and 5 are presented.     

Synthesis and characterization of heterobimetallic mixed-ligand complexes containing Zr(μ-OPri)2Al bridging units

Interesting varieties of heterobimetallic mixed-ligand complexes [Zr{M(OPrⁱ) _n }₂ (L)] (where M = Al, n = 4, L = OC₆H₄CH = NCH₂CH₂O (1); M = Nb, n = 6, L = OC₆H₄CH = NCH₂CH₂O (2); M = Al, n = 4, L = OC₁₀H₆CH = NCH₂CH₂O (3); M = Nb, n = 6, L = OC₁₀H₆CH = NCH₂CH₂O (4)), [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₂Cl(OAr)] (where Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,5 (5); Ar = C₆H₂Me-4-Bu₂-2,6 (6), [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₂(OAr)₂] (where Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,5 (7); Ar = C₆H₂Me-4-Bu₂-2,6 (8), [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₃(OAr)] (where Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,5 (9); Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,6 (10), [ZrAl(OPrⁱ)_7-n (ON=CMe₂) _n ] (where n = 4 (11); n = 7 (12), [ZrAl₂(OPrⁱ)_10-n (ON=CMe₂) _n ] (where n = 4 (13); n = 6 (14); n = 10 (15) and [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₂{ON=CMe(R)} _n Cl_2–n] [where n = 1, R = Me (16); n = 2, R = Me (17); n = 1, R = Et (18); n = 2, R = Et (19)] have been prepared either by the salt elimination method or by alkoxide-ligand exchange. All of these heterobimetallic complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, molecular weight measurements, and spectroscopic (I.r., ¹H-, and ²⁷Al- n.m.r.) studies.     

Distibanes and Distibenes from Reduction of Sb(NONR)Cl by using MgI Reagents

The bis(amidodimethyl)disiloxane antimony chlorides Sb(NON^R)Cl (NON^R=[O(SiMe₂NR)₂]²⁻; R=tBu, Ph, 2,6-Me₂C₆H₃=Dmp, 2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃=Dipp, 2,6-(CHPh₂)₂-4-tBuC₆H₂=tBu-Bhp) are reduced to Sb^II and Sb^I species by using Mg^I reagents, [Mg(BDI^R′)]₂ (BDI=[HC{C(Me)NR′}₂]⁻; R′=2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂=Mes, Dipp). Stoichiometric reactions with Sb(NON^R)Cl (R=tBu, Ph) form dimeric Sb^II stibanes [Sb(NON^R)]₂, shown crystallographically to contain Sb−Sb single bonds. The analogous distibane with R=Dmp substituents has an exceptionally long Sb−Sb interaction and exhibits spectroscopic and reactivity properties consistent with radical character in solution. When R=Dipp, reductions with Mg^I reagents directly give distibenes [Sb(μ-NON^Dipp)Mg(BDI^R′)(THF)_n]₂ (R′=Mes, n=1; R′=Dipp, n=0). Crystallographic analysis shows a trans-substitution of the Sb=Sb double bond, with bridging NON^Dipp-ligands between the Sb^I and Mg^II centres. An attempt to access the NON^Ph-analogue using the same protocol afforded the polystibide cluster Sb₈[μ₄,η^2:2:2:2-Mg(BDI^Mes)]₄, which co-crystallized with the ligand transfer product, [Mg(BDI^Mes)]₂(μ-NON^Ph).     

Potassium and sodium 2,6-di-tert-butylphenoxides and their properties

The crucial factor of the reaction of 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol with alkali hydroxides is temperature, depending on which two types of potassium or sodium 2,6-di-tert-butylphenoxides are formed. These types exhibit different catalytic activity in the alkylation of 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol with methyl acrylate. More active forms of 2,6-Bu^t ₂C₆H₃OK or 2,6-Bu^t ₂C₆H₃ONa are synthesized at temperatures higher than 160 °C and are predominantly the monomers, which dimerize on cooling. The data of ¹H NMR, electronic, and IR spectra for the corresponding forms of 2,6-Bu^t ₂C₆H₃OK and 2,6-Bu^t ₂C₆H₃ONa isolated in the individual state are in agreement with cyclohexadienone structure. In DMSO or DMF, the dimeric forms of 2,6-di-tert-butylphenoxides react with methyl acrylate to form methyl 3-(4-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)propionate in 64–92% yield. Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 12, pp. 2138–2143, December, 2006.     

The synthesis of organoantimony(III) difluorides containing Y,C,Y pincer type ligands using organotin(IV) fluorinating agents

The organoantimony(III) difluorides containing Y,C,Y-chelating, so called pincer, ligands ([2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SbF₂; Y = MeO, t-BuO and Me₂N) were prepared by the reaction of corresponding dichlorides ([2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SbCl₂; Y = MeO, t-BuO and Me₂N) with two equivalents of organotin(IV) fluorinating agents Me₃SnF or 2-(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄Sn(n-Bu₂)F, respectively. The structure of organonantimony fluorides was determined both in solution by ¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy and in the solid state using X-ray diffraction.     

Triorganoantimon- und Triorganobismutderivate von Carbonsäuren fünfgliedriger Heterocyclen Kristall- und Molekülstruktur von (C6H5)3Sb(O2C-2-C4H3S)2

Inhaltsübersicht. Triorganoantimon- und Triorganobismutdicarboxylate R₃M[O₂C(CH₂)ⁿ-2-C₄H₃X]₂ (M = Sb, R = CH₃, C₆H₁₁, C₆H₅, 4-CH₃OC₆H₄; M = Bi, R = C₆H₅, 4-CH₃C₆H₄; n = 0, X = O, S, NH, NCH₃. M = Sb, R = CH₃, C₆H₅; M = Bi, R = C₆H₅; n = 1, X = O, S. M = Sb, R = C₆H₁₁, n = 1, X = S; R = 4-FC₆H₄, n = 0, X = O, S, NCH₃; R = 2,4,6-(CH₃)₃C₆H₂, n = 0, X = O, S, NH) wurden durch Reaktionen von R₃Sb(OH)₂ (R = CH₃, C₆H₁₁, 2,4,6-(CH₃)₃C₆H₂), R₃SbO (R = C₆H₅, 4-CH₃OC₆H₄, 4-FC₆H₄) bzw. R₃BiCO₃ mit den entsprechenden fünfgliedrigen heterocyclischen Carbonsäuren 2-C₄H₃X(CH₂)_nCOOH dargestellt. Auf der Basis schwingungsspektroskopischer Daten wird für alle Verbindungen eine trigonal bipyramidale Umgebung vom M (zwei O-Atome von einzähnigen Carboxylatliganden in den apikalen, drei C-Atome von R in den äquatorialen Positionen) vorgeschlagen, ferner eine schwache Wechselwirkung zwischen O(=C) jeder Carboxylatgruppe und M. Die Kristallstrukturbestimmung von (C₆H₅)₃Sb(O₂C–2-C₄H₃S)₃ stützt diesen Vorschlag. Die Verbindung kristallisiert triklin [Raumgruppe P$1; a = 891,8(14), b = 1058,2(12), c = 1435,6(9) pm, α = 68,53(8), β = 85,47(9), γ = 85,99(11)°; Z = 2; d(ber.) = 1,607 Mg m^–3; V(Zelle) = 1255,6 ų; Strukturbestimmung anhand von 3947 unabhängigen Reflexen (F_o > 3σ(F²_o)), R(ungewichtet) = 0,037]. Sb bindet drei C₆H₅-Gruppen in der äquatorialen Ebene [mittlerer Abstand Sb–C: 211,1(5)pm] und zwei einzähnige Carboxylatliganden in den apikalen Positionen einer verzerrten trigonalen Bipyramide [mittlerer Abstand Sb–O: 212,0(4) pm]. Aus den relativ kurzen Sb – O(=C)-Abständen [274,4(4) und 294,9(4) pm] und aus der Aufweitung des dem O(=C)-Atom nächsten äquatorialen C–Sb–C-Winkels auf 145,9(2)° [andere C-Sb-C-Winkel: 104,4(2), 109,5(2)°] wird auf schwache Sb–O(=C)-Koordination geschlossen. Schließlich wird eine Korrelation zwischen dem (+, –)I-Effekt des Organoliganden R an M (M = Sb, Bi) und der Stärke der M–O(=C)-Koordination in den Dicarboxylaten R₃M[O₂C(CH₂)_n–2-C₄H₃X]₂ vorgeschlagen. Triorganoanümony and Triorganobismuth Derivatives of Carbonic Acids of Five-membered Heterocycles. Crystal and Molecular Structure of (C₆H₅)₃Sb(O₂C–2-C₄H₃S)₂ Triorganoantimony- and triorganobismuth dicarboxylates R₃M[O₂C(CH₂)_n–2-C₄H₃X]₂ (M = Sb, R = CH₃, C₆H₁₁, C₆H₅, 4-CH₃OC₆H₄; M = Bi, R = C₆H₅, 4-CH₃C₆H₄; n = 0, X = O, S, NH, NCH₃. M = Sb, R = CH₃, C₆H₅; M = Bi, R = C₆H₅; n = 1, X = O, S. M = Sb, R = C₆H₁₁, n = 1, X = S; R = 4-FC₆H₄, n = 0, X = O, S, NCH₃; R = 2,4,6-(CH₃)₃C₆H₂, n = 0, X = O, S, NH) have been prepared by reaction of R₃Sb(OH)₂ (R = CH₃, C₆H₁₁; 2,4,6-(CH₃)₃C₆H₂), R₃SbO (R = C₆H₅, 4-CH₃OC₆H₄, 4-FC₆H₄) or R₃BiCO₃ with the appropriate five-membered heterocyclic carboxylic acid. From vibrational data for all compounds a trigonal bipyramidal environment around M (two O atoms of unidendate carboxylate ligands in apical, three C atoms (of R) in equatorial positions) is proposed and also an additional weak interaction of O(=C) of each carboxylate group and M. The crystal structure determination of Ph₃Sb(O₂C–2-C₄H₃S)₂ gives additional prove to this proposal. It crystallizes triclinic [space group P$1; a = 891.8(14), b = 1058.2(12), c = 1435.6(9) pm, α = 68.53(8), β = 85.47(9), γ = 85.99(11)°; Z = 2; d(calc.) = 1.607 Mg m^–3; V_cell = 1255.6 ų; structure determination from 3 947 independent reflexions (F_o > 3σ(F²_o)), R(unweighted) = 0.037]. Sb is bonding to three C₆H₅ groups in the equatorial plane [mean distance Sb–C: 211.1(5) pm] and two unidentate carboxylate ligands in the apical positions of a distorted trigonal bipyramid [mean distance Sb–O: 212.0(4) pm]. From the relatively short Sb–O(=C) distances [274.4(4) and 294.9(4) pm] and from the enlarged value of the equatorial C–Sb–C angle next to the O(=C) atom [145.9(2)°; other C–Sb–C angles: 104.4(2), 109.5(2)°] additional weak Sb–O(=C) coordination is inferred. Finally a correlation between the (+, –) I-effect of the organic ligands It at M and the strength of the M–O = C interaction is suggested.     

Enhancing the Value of Free Metals in the Synthesis of Lanthanoid Formamidinates: Is a Co‐oxidant Needed?

Treatment of N,N′‐bis(aryl)formamidines (ArFormH), N,N′‐bis(2,6‐difluorophenyl)formamidine (DFFormH) or N,N′‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)formamidine (DippFormH), with europium metal in CH₃CN is an efficient synthesis of the divalent complexes: [{Eu(DFForm)₂(CH₃CN)₂}₂] ( Eu1 ) or [Eu(DippForm)₂(CH₃CN)₄] ( Eu2 ). The synthetic method was extended to ytterbium, but the metal required activation by addition of Hg⁰. With DFFormH in CH₃CN, [{Yb(DFForm)₂(CH₃CN)}₂] ( Yb1 ) was obtained in good yield, and [Yb(DFForm)₂(thf)₃] ( Yb3 ) was obtained from a synthesis in CH₃CN/THF. Thus, this synthetic method completely circumvents the use of either salt metathesis, or redox transmetallation/protolysis (RTP) protocols to prepare divalent rare‐earth formamidinates. Heating Yb1 in PhMe/C₆D₆ resulted in decomposition to trivalent products, including one from a CH₃CN activation process. For a synthetic comparison, divalent ytterbium DFForm and DippForm complexes were synthesised by RTP reactions between Yb⁰, Hg(R)₂ (R=Ph, C₆F₅), and ArFormH in THF, leading to the isolation of either [Yb(DFForm)₂(thf)₃] ( Yb3 ), or the first five coordinate rare‐earth formamidinate complex [Yb(DippForm)₂(thf)] ( Yb4 b ), and, from adjustment of the stoichiometry, trivalent [Yb(DFForm)₃(thf)] ( Yb6 ). Oxidation of Yb3 with benzophenone (bp), or halogenating agents (TiCl₄(thf)₂, Ph₃CCl, C₂Cl₆) gave [Yb(DFForm)₃(bp)] or [Yb(DFForm)₂Cl(thf)₂], respectively. Furthermore, the structural chemistry of divalent ArForm complexes has been substantially broadened. Not only have the highest and lowest coordination numbers for divalent rare‐earth ArForm complexes been achieved in Eu2 and Yb4 b , respectively, but also dimeric Eu1 and Yb1 have highly unusual ArForm bridging coordination modes, either perpendicular μ‐1κ(N:N′):2κ(N:N′) in Eu1 , or the twisted μ‐1κ(N:N′):2κ(N′:F′) DFForm coordination in Yb1 , both unprecedented in divalent rare‐earth ArForm chemistry and in the wider divalent rare‐earth amidinate field.     

The chemical oxidation and electronic spectra of the complexes trans-[M(CNR)2(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)2] (M = Mo or W)

Oxidation of the complexes $\text{trans}$-[M(CNR)₂(dppe)₂] (A) (M = Mo or W; R = Me, Bu^t or CH₃C₆H₄-$\text{4}$; dppe = Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) with diiodine or silver (I) salts gives the paramagnetic cations $\text{trans}$-[M(CNR)₂(dppe)₂]⁺, (M = Mo, R = CH₃C₆H₄-$\text{4}$; M = W, R = Bu^t) and $\text{trans}$-[M(CNR)₂(dppe)₂]²⁺ (M = Mo, R = Me or CH₃C₆H₄-$\text{4}$; M = W, R = Me or Bu^t). Mixtures of products are generally produced when dichlorine or dibromine are the oxidising agents, however pure salts, the seven-coordinate complex cations [MX(CNC₆H₄CH₃-$\text{4}$)₂(dppe)₂]⁺ (B, X = Cl or Br) have been isolated. A simple molecular orbital scheme is proposed for complexes (A) and used to discuss their electronic spectra and their oxidation.     

Synthesis and Structure of (N,)C,N‐chelated Organoantimony(III) and Bismuth(III) Cations and Isolation of Their Adducts with Ag[CB11H12]

The treatment of N,C,N‐chelated antimony(III) and bismuth(III) chlorides [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NR)₂]MCl₂ [R = tBu and M = Sb ( 1 ) or Bi ( 2 ); R = Dmp and M = Sb ( 3 ) or Bi ( 4 )] (Dmp = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) with one molar equivalent of Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] led to a smooth formation of corresponding ionic pairs {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NR)₂]MCl}⁺[CB₁₁H₁₂]^– [R = tBu and M = Sb ( 7 ) or Bi ( 8 ), R = Dmp and M = Sb ( 9 ) or Bi ( 10 )]. Similarly, the reaction of C,N‐chelated analogues [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH=NDip)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]MCl₂ [M = Sb ( 5 ) or Bi ( 6 ), Dip = 2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃] gave compounds {[C₆H₂‐2‐(CH=NDip)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]MCl}⁺[CB₁₁H₁₂]^– [M = Sb ( 11 ) or Bi ( 12 )]. All compounds 7 – 12 were characterized with ¹H, ¹¹B and ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectroscopy, ESI‐mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and molecular structures of 7 – 9 and 12 were determined by the help of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. In contrast, all attempts to cleave also the second M–Cl bond in 7 – 12 using another molar equivalent Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] remained unsuccessful. Nevertheless, the reaction between 7 (or 8 ) and Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] produced unprecedented adducts of both reagents namely {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NtBu)₂]SbCl}₂²⁺[Ag₂(CB₁₁H₁₂)₄]^2– ( 13 ) and {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NtBu)₂]BiCl}⁺[Ag(CB₁₁H₁₂)₂]^– ( 14 ) in a reproducible manner. The molecular structures of these sparingly soluble compounds were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Alkyl(aryl)oxy derivatives of thulium(III)

The reactions of Tml₂(DME)₃ with phenol andtert-butyl alcohol afforded thulium(III)-alkoxyiodides ROTmI₂(DME)₂ (R=Ph and Bu^t, respectively). Their structures were determined by X-ray analysis. Monoiodides (RO)₂ TmI(THF)₂ were synthesized from TmI₃ (THF)₂ and ROH (taken in a ratio of 1∶2). Triphenoxides (RO)₃Tm (R=Ph or 2,4,6-Bu^t ₃C₆H₂) were prepared by the reactions of the naphthalene thulium complex [C₁₀H₈Tm(DME)]₂C₁₀H₈, with an excess of the corresponding phenol. The iodide catechoxide complex 3,6-Bu^t ₂C₆H₂O₂TmI(DME)₂ was prepared by the reaction of TmI₂(DME)₃ with 3,6-di-tert-butylbenzoquinone-1,2 or 3,6-di-tert-butylpyrocatechol. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 9, pp. 1804–1807, September, 1999.     

Bis(fluorbenzoyloxy)methylphosphanoxide

Bis(fluorbenzoyloxy)methyl phosphane oxides CH₃P(O)[OC(O)R]₂ [R = C₆H₄2F (1), C₆H₄3F (2), C₆H₄4F (3), C₆H₃2,6F₂ (4), C₆H2,3,5,6F₄ (5)] were prepared by treating silver salts of carboxylic acids AgOC(O)R with CH₃P(O)C?₂ (IR-, ¹H-, ¹⁹?F-and ³¹P{¹H}-NMR-data). The mixed anhydrides 1–5 show unusual thermal stability at room temperature. Stability against hydrolysis decreases with increasing number of fluorine-atoms. The reaction of R′P(O)C?₂ [R′ = CH₃, C₆H₅, (CH₃)₃C] with M^IOC(O)R_F [R_F = CF₃, C₂F₅, C₆F₅; M^I = Ag^I, Na^I T?^I] was investigated.     

Synthesis of a “Masked” Terminal Nickel(II) Sulfide by Reductive Deprotection and its Reaction with Nitrous Oxide

The addition of 1 equiv of KSCPh₃ to [L^RNiCl] (L^R={(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(R)}₂CH; R=Me, tBu) in C₆H₆ results in the formation of [L^RNi(SCPh₃)] ( 1 : R=Me; 2 : R=tBu) in good yields. Subsequent reduction of 1 and 2 with 2 equiv of KC₈ in cold (?25 °C) Et₂O in the presence of 2 equiv of 18‐crown‐6 results in the formation of “masked” terminal Ni^II sulfides, [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^RNi(S)] ( 3 : R=Me; 4 : R=tBu), also in good yields. An X‐ray crystallographic analysis of these complexes suggests that they feature partial multiple‐bond character in their Ni? S linkages. Addition of N₂O to a toluene solution of 4 provides [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^tBuNi(SN?NO)], which features the first example of a thiohyponitrite (κ²‐[SN?NO]^2?) ligand.     

Carbamoyl and alkoxycarbonyl complexes of palladium(II) and platinum(II)

Carbamoyl and alkoxycarbonyl complexes of palladium(II) and platinum(II) of the type M(pnp)(CONHR)Cl (pnp = 2,6-bis(diphenylphosphinomethyl)pyridine; M Pd, R  C₆H₅, p-CH₃C₆H₄, p-CH₃OC₆H₄, C₆H₁₁, t-Bu; M  Pt, R  C₆H₅), Pd(pnp)[CON(Pr)₂]Cl (Pr = propyl), M(pnp)(COOR)Cl (M  Pd, R  C₆H₅, CH₃; M  Pt, R  CH₃), Pd(pnp)(COOCH₃)₂ result from reaction of M(pnp)Cl₂ with carbon monoxide and amines or alkoxides at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.The carbamoyl complexes react with bases to give urethane or diphenylurea depending upon the experimental conditions.     

Spin-adducts of radicals ·P(O)(OPri)2 and ·CMe3 with pyrrolidino[60]fullerenes studied by ESR spectroscopy

The addition of the ^·Bu^t (R¹) and ^·P(O)(OPrⁱ)₂ (R²) radicals to pyrrolidino[60]fullerenes C₆₀CH₂NMeCHX (X = C₆H₄N(CH₂CH₂Cl)₂, 2,6-(Bu^t)₂C₆H₂OH, PhC₆H₄, and indol-3-yl) was studied by ESR spectroscopy. The rate constants of R¹ radical addition to these compounds and dimerization of spin-adducts of the R¹ radicals with pyrrolidino[60]fullerenes were determined. Pyrrolidino[60]fullerenes manifest considerably higher reactivity toward the R¹ radicals than fullerene C₆₀ and methanofullerenes C₆₀CX¹X² (X¹ = X² = CO₂Et; X¹ = CO₂Me, X² = OP(OMe)₂, X¹ = X² = OP(OEt)₂).     

CycloSiFA: The Next Generation of Silicon-Based Fluoride Acceptors for Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

The ring-opening Si-fluorination of a variety of azasilole derivatives cyclo-1-(iPr₂Si)−4-X−C₆H₃−2-CH₂NR ( 4 : R=2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃, X=H; 4 a : R=2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂, X=H; 9 : R=2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃, X=tBuMe₂SiO; 10 : R=2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃, X=OH; 13 : R=2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃, X=HCCCH₂O; 22 : R=2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃, X=tBuMe₂SiCH₂O) with different ¹⁹F-fluoride sources was studied, optimized and the experience gained was used in a translational approach to create a straightforward ¹⁸F-labelling protocol for the azasilole derivatives [¹⁸F] 6 and [¹⁸F] 14 . The latter constitutes a potential clickable CycloSiFA prosthetic group which might be used in PET tracer development using Cu-catalysed triazole formation. Based on our findings, CycloSiFA has the potential to become a new entry into non-canonical labelling methodologies for radioactive PET tracer development.     

Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of aryloxide derivatives of titanium(IV) and zirconium(IV)

Homo- and heteroleptic aryloxides of the type MX_4–x(OAr)_x [M = Ti^IV, Zr^IV; X = OPrⁱ, Cl; x = 1,2,3,4; OAr = OC₆H₄Prⁱ-4(OAr¹), OC₆H₃Me-2-Prⁱ-5(OAr²), OC₆H₃Me-5-Prⁱ-2(OAr³), OC₆H₂Me₃-2,4,6(OAr⁴), OC₆H₃Bu^t₂-2,4(OAr⁵), OC₆H₃Bu^t₂-2,6(OAr⁶)] have been prepared either by alkoxo–aryloxo or chloro-aryloxo exchange reactions in benzene or tetrahydrofuran. All these new derivatives have been characterized by elemental analyses, spectroscopic (i.r., ¹H-, ¹³C-n.m.r.) studies and molecular weight measurements. The FAB mass spectral studies of four representative derivatives Support a dimeric nature for [Ti(OC₆H₃Me-5-Prⁱ-2)₄], [TiCl₂(OC₆H₃Me-5-Prⁱ-2)₂], and [Zr(OC₆H₃Bu^t₂-2,4)₄(thf)], whereas the derivative [ZrCl(OC₆H₃Bu^t₂-2,4)₃(thf)] is monomeric.     

Ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization by salicylaldiminato vanadium(III) complexes activated with diethylaluminum chloride

Mono salicylaldiminato vanadium（Ⅲ） complexes（1a-1f）[RN = CH（ArO）]VCl₂（THF）₂（Ar = C₆H₄（1a-1e）,R = Ph,1a;R = p-CF₃Ph,1b;R = 2,6-Me₂Ph,1c;R = 2,6-iPr₂Ph,1d;R = cyclohexyl,1e;Ar = C₆H₂tBu₂（2,4）,R = 2,6-iPr₂Ph, 1f） and bis（salicylaldiminato） vanadium（Ⅲ） complexes（2a-2f）[RN = CH（ArO）]₂VCl（THF）_x（Ar = C₆H₄（2a-2e）,x = 1 （2a-2e）,R = Ph,2a;R =p-CF₃Ph,2b;R = 2,6-Me₂Ph,2c;R = 2,6-iPr₂Ph,2d;R = cyclohexyl,2e;Ar = C₆H₂tBu₂（2,4）,R = 2,6-iPr₂Ph,x = 0,2f） have been evaluated as the active catalysts for ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization in the presence of Et₂AlCl.The ligand substitution pattern and the catalyst structure model significantly influenced the polymerization behaviors such as the catalytic activity,the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the copolymers etc.The highest catalytic activity of 8.82 kg PE/（mmol_V·h） was observed for vanadium catalyst 2d with two 2,6-diisopropylphenyl substituted salicylaldiminato ligands.The copolymer with the highest molecular weight was obtained by using mono salicylaldiminato vanadium catalyst 1f having ligands with tert-butyl at the ortho and para of the aryloxy moiety.     

Molybdenum(VI) Bis(imido) Complexes: From Frustrated Lewis Pairs to Weakly Coordinating Cations

Molybdenum(VI) bis(imido) complexes [Mo(NtBu)₂(L^R)₂] (R=H 1 a ; R=CF₃ 1 b ) combined with B(C₆F₅)₃ ( 1 a /B(C₆F₅)₃, 1 b /B(C₆F₅)₃) exhibit a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) character that can heterolytically split H−H, Si−H and O−H bonds. Cleavage of H₂ and Et₃SiH affords ion pairs [Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂][HB(C₆F₅)₃] (R=H 2 a ; R=CF₃ 2 b ) composed of a Mo(VI) amido imido cation and a hydridoborate anion, while reaction with H₂O leads to [Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂][(HO)B(C₆F₅)₃] (R=H 3 a ; R=CF₃ 3 b ). Ion pairs 2 a and 2 b are catalysts for the hydrosilylation of aldehydes with triethylsilane, with 2 b being more active than 2 a . Mechanistic elucidation revealed insertion of the aldehyde into the B−H bond of [HB(C₆F₅)₃]⁻. We were able to isolate and fully characterize, including by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, the inserted products Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂][{PhCH₂O}B(C₆F₅)₃] (R=H 4 a ; R=CF₃ 4 b ). Catalysis occurs at [HB(C₆F₅)₃]⁻ while [Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂]⁺ (R=H or CF₃) act as the cationic counterions. However, the striking difference in reactivity gives ample evidence that molybdenum cations behave as weakly coordinating cations (WCC).