Syntheses and Structures of Terminal Arylalumylene Complexes

Terminal arylalumylene complexes of platinum [Ar‐Al‐Pt(PCy₃)₂] (Ar=2,6‐[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂C₆H₃ (Bbp) or 2,6‐[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂‐4‐(tBu)C₆H₂ (Tbb)) have been synthesized either by the reaction of a dialumene–benzene adduct with [Pt(PCy₃)₂], or by the reduction of 1,2‐dibromodialumanes Ar(Br)Al‐Al(Br)Ar in the presence of [Pt(PCy₃)₂]. X‐Ray crystallographic analysis reveals that the Al? Pt bond lengths of these arylalumylene complexes are shorter than the previously reported shortest Al? Pt distance. DFT calculations suggest that the Al? Pt bonds in the arylalumylene complexes have a significantly high electrostatic character.     

Barreleneiridium(I) complexes. Crystal structures of [Ir(Me3TFB)(η6-C6H4Me2)]ClO4 and [Ir(TFB)(η5-PhNPh2)]BF4·CH2Cl2 (TFB = tetrafluorobenzobarrelene)

A new series of cationic areneiridium(I) complexes of formula [Ir(barrelene)(arene)]⁺ or [Ir(barrelene)(PhNRPh)]⁺ (R= Ph or H) have been synthesized from neutral iridium complexes of the type [IrY(barrelene)]_x (barrelene = Me₃TFB, Y = Cl or OMe (x = 2), Y = acac (x = 1); barrelene = TFB, Y = OMe (x = 2), Y = acac (x = 1)). The crystal structures of [Ir(Me₃TFB)(1,4-C₆H₄Me₂)]ClO₄ and [Ir(TFB)(PhNPh₂)]BF₄·CH₂Cl₂ have been determined by X-ray diffraction. They crystallize in the space groups Pbca and Pna2₁ respectively with lattice constants of 17.6947(11), 15.8072(10), 16.0019(11) Å and 9.8059(2), 20.8097(9), 14.3367(4) Å. Final R factors were 0.063 and 0.042 for the observed data. Both complexes show a staggered arrangement between the arene and the TFB moieties and deviation from planarity of the coordinated arene ligands. In the second complex the IrC and NC distances, the CNC angle, the type of arene puckering, and the spectroscopic data indicate a distortion of the coordinated arene towards a η⁵-coordinated iminocyclohexadienyl form.     

Proton‐Assisted Hydrogen Activation on Polyhedral Cations

The treatment of [1,1‐(PR₃)₂‐3‐(Py)‐closo‐1,2‐RhSB₉H₈] (PR₃=PMe₃ ( 2 ) or PPh₃ and PMe₃ ( 3 ); Py=pyridine) with triflic acid (TfOH) affords [1,3‐μ‐(H)‐1,1‐(PR₃)₂‐3‐(Py)‐1,2‐RhSB₉H₈]⁺ (PR₃=PMe₃ ( 4 ) or PMe₃ and PPh₃ ( 5 )). These products result from the protonation of the 11‐vertex closo‐cages along the Rh(1)? B(3) edge. These unusual cationic rhodathiaboranes are stable in solution and in the solid state and they have been fully characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. In addition, compound 5 was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. One remarkable feature in these structures is the presence of three {Rh(PPh₃)(PMe₃)}‐to‐{ηⁿ‐SB₉H₈(Py)} (n=4 or 5) conformers in the unit cell, thus giving an uncommon case of conformational isomerism. [1,1‐(PPh₃)₂‐3‐(Py)‐closo‐1,2‐RhSB₉H₈] ( 1 ), that is, the bis‐PPh₃‐ligated analogue of compounds 2 and 3 , is also protonated by TfOH, but, in marked contrast, the resulting cation, [1,3‐μ‐(H)‐1,1‐(PPh₃)₂‐3‐(Py)‐1,2‐RhSB₉H₈]⁺ ( 6 ), is attacked by a triflate anion with the release of a PPh₃ ligand and the formation of [8,8‐(OTf)(PPh₃)‐9‐(Py)‐nido‐8,7‐RhSB₉H₉] ( 9 ). The result is an equilibrium that involves cationic species 6 , neutral OTf‐ligated compound 9 , and [HPPh₃]⁺, which is formed upon protonation of the released PPh₃ ligand. The resulting ionic system reacts readily with H₂ to give cationic species [8,8,8‐(H)(PPh₃)₂‐9‐(Py)‐nido‐8,7‐RhSB₉H₉]⁺ ( 7 ). This reactivity is markedly higher than that previously found for compound 1 and it introduces a new example of proton‐assisted H₂ activation that occurs on a polyhedral boron‐containing compound.     

N,O‐chelate aluminum and zinc complexes: synthesis and catalysis in the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone

Reaction between 2‐(1H‐pyrrol‐1‐yl)benzenamine and 2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde or 3,5‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde afforded 2‐(4,5‐dihydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL¹NH, 1a) or 2,4‐di‐tert‐butyl‐6‐(4,5‐dihydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL²NH, 1b). Both 1a and 1b can be converted to 2‐(H‐pyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL³N, 2a) and 2,4‐di‐tert‐butyl‐6‐(H‐pyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL⁴N, 2b), respectively, by heating 1a and 1b in toluene. Treatment of 1b with an equivalent of AlEt₃ afforded [Al(Et₂)(OL²NH)] (3). Reaction of 1b with two equivalents of AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave dinuclear aluminum complexes [(AlR₂)₂(OL²N)] (R = Me, 4a; R = Et, 4b). Refluxing the toluene solution of 4a and 4b, respectively, generated [Al(R₂)(OL⁴N)] (R = Me, 5a; R = Et, 5b). Complexes 5a and 5b were also obtained either by refluxing a mixture of 1b and two equivalents of AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) in toluene or by treatment of 2b with an equivalent of AlR₃ (R = Me, Et). Reaction of 2a with an equivalent of AlMe₃ afforded [Al(Me₂)(OL³N)] (5c). Treatment of 1b with an equivalent of ZnEt₂ at room temperature gave [Zn(Et)(OL²NH)] (6), while reaction of 1b with 0.5 equivalent of ZnEt₂ at 40 °C afforded [Zn(OL²NH)₂] (7). Reaction of 1b with two equivalents of ZnEt₂ from room temperature to 60 °C yielded [Zn(Et)(OL⁴N)] (8). Compound 8 was also obtained either by reaction between 6 and an equivalent of ZnEt₂ from room temperature to 60 °C or by treatment of 2b with an equivalent of ZnEt₂ at room temperature. Reaction of 2b with 0.5 equivalent of ZnEt₂ at room temperature gave [Zn(OL⁴N)₂] (9), which was also formed by heating the toluene solution of 6. All novel compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The structures of complexes 3, 5c and 6 were additionally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalysis of complexes 3, 4a, 5a–c, 6 and 8 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone was evaluated. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Iodinated ortho‐Carboranes as Versatile Building Blocks to Design Intermolecular Interactions in Crystal Lattices

The crystal structures of numerous iodinated ortho‐carboranes have been studied, which has revealed the diversity of intermolecular interactions that these substances can adopt in the solid state. The nature—mostly as it relates to hydrogen and/or halogen bonds—and relative strength of such interactions can be adjusted by selectively introducing substituents onto the cluster, thus enabling the rational design of crystal lattices. In this work we present the newly determined crystal structures of the following iodinated ortho‐carboranes: 9‐I‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁, 4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12‐I₈‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₄, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12‐I₁₀‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₂, 1‐Me‐8,9,10,12‐I₄‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₇, 1,2‐Me₂‐8,9,10,12‐I₄‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₆, and 1,2‐Ph₂‐8,9,10,12‐I₄‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₆. Their 3D supramolecular organization has been thoroughly investigated and compared to similar previously published crystal structures. Such a systematic survey has allowed us to draw some general trends. C_c? H???I? B hydrogen bonds (C_c= cluster carbon atoms) appear to be significant in the growth of the crystal lattices of these compounds, given the acidity of hydrogen atoms bonded to C_c, and the polarization of B? I bonds. These hydrogen bonds can be disrupted by selectively blocking the positions next to C_c, that is, B(3) and B(6), with bulky substituents that prevent iodine atoms from approaching as hydrogen acceptors. Halogen bonds of the type B? I???I? B are frequently observed in most cases, thus suggesting that these interactions could be attractive in boron clusters. In addition, different substituents can be grafted onto the ortho‐carborane surface, thereby providing further possibilities for homomeric or heteromeric molecular assembly.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Complexes (M = Al,Ti, W,Zn) Containing Pyrrole‐imine Ligands

A series of metal compounds (M = Al, Ti, W, and Zn) containing pyrrole‐imine ligands have been prepared and structurally characterized. The reactions of AlMe₃ with one and three equivs of pyrrole‐imine ligand [C₄H₃NH‐(2‐CH=N? CH₂Ph)] ( 1 ) generated aluminum compounds Al[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=N? CH₂Ph)]Me₂ ( 2 ) and Al[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₃ ( 3 ), respectively, in relatively high yield. Reacting two equivs of 1 with Ti(OⁱPr)₄, W(NH^tBu)₂(=N^tBu)₂, or ZnMe₂ afforded Ti[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₂(OⁱPr)₂ ( 4 ), W[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₂(=N^tBu)₂ ( 5 ), and Zn[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₂ ( 6 ), respectively. All the compounds have been characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. Compounds 3 – 6 have also been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis. The biting angles of pyrrole‐imine ligand with metals decrease and their related M? N_pyrrole and M? N_imine bond lengths increase in the order of 6 , 3 , 4 , and 5 .     

Intramolecular Communication in Anionic Oxidized Phosphanes through a Chelated Proton

Oxidation of the 1,2‐(PR₂)₂‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀ (R=Ph, iPr) platform with hydrogen peroxide in acetone is a two‐step procedure in which partial deboronation of the closo cluster and oxidation of the phosphorus atoms occur. Based on NMR spectroscopic and kinetic data, we demonstrate that the phosphorus atoms are oxidized in the first step, followed by cluster deboronation. DFT calculations and natural‐bond orbital (NBO) analysis were used to obtain insight into the electronic structures of diphosphane ortho‐carborane derivatives.     

Complexes of adamantane‐based group 13 Lewis acids and superacids: Bonding analysis and thermodynamics of hydrogen splitting

The electronic structure and chemical bonding in donor–acceptor complexes formed by group 13 element adamantane and perfluorinated adamantane derivatives EC₉R′₁₅ (E = B, Al; R′ = H, F) with Lewis bases XR₃ and XC₉H₁₅ (X = N, P; R= H, CH₃) have been studied using energy decomposition analysis at the BP86/TZ2P level of theory. Larger stability of complexes with perfluorinated adamantane derivatives is mainly due to better electrostatic and orbital interactions. Deformation energies of the fragments and Pauli repulsion are of less importance, with exception for the boron‐phosphorus complexes. The MO analysis reveals that LUMO energies of EC₉R′₁₅ significantly decrease upon fluorination (by 4.7 and 3.6 eV for E = B and Al, respectively) which results in an increase of orbital interaction energies by 27–38 (B) and 15–26 (Al) kcal mol^?1. HOMO energies of XR₃ increase in order PH₃ < NH₃ < PMe₃ < PC₉H₁₅ < NMe₃ < NC₉H₁₅. For the studied complexes, there is a linear correlation between the dissociation energy of the complex and the energy difference between HOMO of the donor and LUMO of the acceptor. The fluorination of the Lewis acid significantly reduces standard enthalpies of the heterolytic hydrogen splitting H₂ + D + A = [HD]⁺ + [HA]^?. Analysis of several types of the [HD]⁺···[HA]^? ion pair formation in the gas phase reveals that structures with additional H···F interactions are energetically favorable. Taking into account the ion pair formation, hydrogen splitting is predicted to be highly exothermic in case of the perfluorinated derivatives both in the gas phase and in solution. Thus, fluorinated adamantane‐based Lewis superacids are attractive synthetic targets for the construction of the donor–acceptor cryptands. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Reactivity of Dialumane and “Dialumene” Compounds toward Alkenes

The reactions of dialumane [L(thf)Al? Al(thf)L] ( 1 , L=[{(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(Me)}₂]^2?) with stilbene and styrene afforded the oxidation/insertion products [L(thf)Al(CH(Ph)? CH(Ph))AlL] ( 2 ) and [L(thf)Al(CH(Ph)? CH₂)Al(thf)L] ( 3 ), respectively. In the presence of Na metal, precursor 1 reacted with butadienes, possibly through the reduced “dialumene” or the “carbene‐like” :AlL species, to yield aluminacyclopentenes [LAl(CH₂C(Me)?C(Me)CH₂)Na]_n ( 4 a ) and [Na(dme)₃][LAl(CH₂C(Me)?CHCH₂)] ( 4 b , dme=dimethoxyethane) as [1+4] cycloaddition products, as well as the [2+4] cycloaddition product 1,6‐dialumina‐3,8‐cyclodecadiene, [{Na(dme)}₂][LAl(CH₂C(Me)?C(Me)CH₂)₂AlL] ( 5 ). The possible mechanisms of the cycloaddition reactions were studied by using DFT computations.     

Discrete Magnesium Hydride Aggregates: A Cationic Mg13H18 Cluster Stabilized by NNNN‐Type Macrocycles

Large magnesium hydride aggregates [Mg₁₃(Me₃TACD)₆(μ₂‐H₁₂)(μ₃‐H₆)][A]₂ ((Me₃TACD)H=1,4,7‐trimethyl‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane; A=AlEt₄, AlnBu₄, B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄) were synthesized stepwise from alkyl complexes [Mg₂(Me₃TACD)R₃] (R=Et, nBu) and phenylsilane in the presence of additional Mg^II ions. The central magnesium atom is octahedrally coordinated by six hydrides as in solid α‐MgH₂ of the rutile type. Further coordination to six magnesium atoms leads to a substructure of seven edge‐sharing octahedra as found in the hexagonal layer of brucite (Mg(OH)₂). Upon protonolysis in the presence of 1,2‐dimethoxyethane (DME), this cluster was degraded into a tetranuclear dication [Mg₂(Me₃TACD)(μ‐H)₂(DME)]₂[A]₂.     

Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone

The first isolable pyridine‐stabilized germanone has been prepared and its reactivity toward trimethylaluminum has been investigated. The germanone adduct results from a stepwise conversion that starts from 4‐dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and the ylide‐like N‐heterocyclic germylene LGe: (L=CH{(C?CH₂)(CMe)[N(aryl)]₂}, aryl=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) at room temperature, and gives the corresponding germylene–pyridine adduct L(DMAP)Ge: ( 2 ) in 91 % yield. The latter reacts with N₂O at room temperature to form the desired germanone complex L(DMAP)Ge?O ( 3 ) in 73 % yield. The Ge? O distance of 1.646(2) Å in 3 is the shortest hitherto reported for a Ge?O species. The reaction of 3 with trimethylaluminum leads solely to the addition product LGe(Me)O[Al(DMAP)Me₂] ( 4 ). The latter results from insertion of the Ge?O subunit into an Al? Me bond of AlMe₃ and concomitant migration of the DMAP ligand from germanium to the aluminum atom. Compounds 2 – 4 have been fully characterized by analytical and spectroscopic methods. Their molecular structures have been established by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallographic analysis.     

Breaking the Passivation: Sodium Borohydride Synthesis by Reacting Hydrated Borax with Aluminum

A significant obstacle in the large-scale applications of sodium borohydride (NaBH₄) for hydrogen storage is its high cost. Herein, we report a new method to synthesize NaBH₄ by ball milling hydrated sodium tetraborate (Na₂B₄O₇ ⋅ 10H₂O) with low-cost Al or Al₈₈Si₁₂, instead of Na, Mg or Ca. An effective strategy is developed to facilitate mass transfer during the reaction by introducing NaH to enable the formation of NaAlO₂ instead of dense Al₂O₃ on Al surface, and by using Si as a milling additive to prevent agglomeration and also break up passivation layers. Another advantage of this process is that hydrogen in Na₂B₄O₇ ⋅ 10H₂O serves as a hydrogen source for NaBH₄ generation. Considering the low cost of the starting materials and simplicity in operation, our studies demonstrate the potential of producing NaBH₄ in a more economical way than the commercial process.     

Aluminiumorganic compounds of coordinated salicylaldoxime and their adducts with nitrogen Lewis bases

Aluminiumorganic compounds of a coordinated salicylaldoxime resulted from reaction of M(II)(SALOxH)₂ (where M(II) = Ni(II), Pd(II) and Cu(II); SALOx represents the divalent radical of the salicylaldoxime) with AlR₃(R = CH₃,C₂H₅,i‐C₄H₉,C₆H₅ and Cl). Copper(II) bis‐salicylaldoximate reacting with Al(i‐C₄H₉)₃ does not form a compound similar to those obtained with nickel and palladium. Aluminiumorganic compounds of the coordinated salicylaldoxime result from the substitution of O? H?O hydrogen bonds, existing in chelates, by O? Al? O bridges. All compounds reported in this paper were separated from the reaction mixture as coloured powders and were characterized by chemical analyses, IR spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction spectra, proton NMR spectra and magnetic properties. The new aluminiumorganic compounds form adducts with amine. Among the amine adducts, only the adducts with pyridine were isolated to confirm their formula and the mode of binding. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Boosting Low‐Valent Aluminum(I) Reactivity with a Potassium Reagent

The reagent RK [R=CH(SiMe₃)₂ or N(SiMe₃)₂] was expected to react with the low‐valent (^DIPPBDI)Al (^DIPPBDI=HC[C(Me)N(DIPP)]₂, DIPP=2,6‐iPr‐phenyl) to give [(^DIPPBDI)AlR]^?K⁺. However, deprotonation of the Me group in the ligand backbone was observed and [H₂C=C(N‐DIPP)?C(H)=C(Me)?N?DIPP]Al^?K⁺ ( 1 ) crystallized as a bright‐yellow product (73 %). Like most anionic Al^I complexes, 1 forms a dimer in which formally negatively charged Al centers are bridged by K⁺ ions, showing strong K⁺???DIPP interactions. The rather short Al–K bonds [3.499(1)–3.588(1) Å] indicate tight bonding of the dimer. According to DOSY NMR analysis, 1 is dimeric in C₆H₆ and monomeric in THF, but slowly reacts with both solvents. In reaction with C₆H₆, two C?H bond activations are observed and a product with a para‐phenylene moiety was exclusively isolated. DFT calculations confirm that the Al center in 1 is more reactive than that in (^DIPPBDI)Al. Calculations show that both Al^I and K⁺ work in concert and determines the reactivity of 1 .     

Hydrothermal Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Catalytic Properties of Three Coordination Polymers Containing ­Flexible Bis(benzimidazole) and Dicarboxylate Ligands

Three metal‐organic coordination polymers, namely {[Cd(L1)(1,2‐chdc)] · 2H₂O}_n ( 1 ), {[Ni(L2)(1,2‐chdc)] · H₂O}_n ( 2 ), and [Cd(L2)(npht)]_n ( 3 ) [L1 = 1,2‐bis(2‐methylbenzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene, L2 = 1,2‐bis(5,6‐dimethylbenzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene, 1,2‐H₂chdc = 1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, H₂npht = 3‐nitrophthalic acid] were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions and structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods, IR spectroscopy, TGA, and elemental analysis. In compound 1 , two 1,2‐chdc^2– ligands connect two neighboring Cd atoms to form a dinuclear [Cd₂(1,2‐chdc)₂] subunit, which is further linked by L1 ligands to construct a 1D ladder‐like chain. Compound 2 exhibits a 2D (4,4) coordination network with {4⁴.6²} topology, whilst compound 3 shows a 1D helical chain structure. The fluorescence, UV/Vis diffuse reflection spectra, and catalytic properties of complexes 1 – 3 for the degradation of the congo red azo dye in a Fenton‐like process are investigated.     

Formation and Reactivity of an Aluminabenzene Ligand at Pentadienyl‐Supported Rare‐Earth Metals

The half‐open rare‐earth‐metal aluminabenzene complexes [(1‐Me‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al)(μ‐Me)Ln(2,4‐dtbp)] (Ln=Y, Lu) are accessible via a salt metathesis reaction employing Ln(AlMe₄)₃ and K(2,4‐dtbp). Treatment of the yttrium complex with B(C₆F₅)₃ and tBuCCH gives access to the pentafluorophenylalane complex [{1‐(C₆F₅)‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al}{μ‐C₆F₅}Y{2,4‐dtbp}] and the mixed vinyl acetylide complex [(2,4‐dtbp)Y(μ‐η¹:η³‐2,4‐tBu₂‐C₅H₄)(μ‐CCtBu)AlMe₂], respectively.     

Synthese und Molekülstruktur von [{Cp′(μ‐η1 : η5‐C5H3Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}2] (Cp′ = C5H4Me,R = iBu,Et)

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of [{Cp′(μ‐η¹ : η⁵‐C₅H₃Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}₂] (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me, R = ⁱBu, Et) [Cp′₂MoH₂] reacts with HAlR₂ to give [{Cp′(μ‐η¹ : η⁵‐C₅H₃Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}₂] (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me, R = ⁱBu ( 1 ), Et ( 2 )). Crystal structure determinations were carried out on [Cp′₂MoH₂] and 1 . 1 exhibits a direct Mo–Al bond (2.636(2) Å).     

Unexpected beauty and diversity in the structures of three homologous 4,5‐dialkoxy‐1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitrobenzenes: the subtle interplay between intermolecular C—H…O hydrogen bonds and alkyl chain length

The synthesis, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra, and X‐ray structures are described for three dialkoxy ethynylnitrobenzenes that differ only in the length of the alkoxy chain, namely 1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitro‐4,5‐dipropoxybenzene, C₁₄H₁₇NO₄, 1,2‐dibutoxy‐4‐ethynyl‐5‐nitrobenzene, C₁₆H₂₁NO₄, and 1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitro‐4,5‐dipentoxybenzene, C₁₈H₂₅NO₄. Despite the subtle changes in molecular structure, the crystal structures of the three compounds display great diversity. Thus, 1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitro‐4,5‐dipropoxybenzene crystallizes in the trigonal crystal system in the space group , with Z = 18, 1,2‐dibutoxy‐4‐ethynyl‐5‐nitrobenzene crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system in the space group P 2₁/c , with Z = 4, and 1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitro‐4,5‐dipentoxybenzene crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system in the space group , with Z = 2. The crystal structure of 1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitro‐4,5‐dipropoxybenzene is dominated by planar hexamers formed by a bifurcated alkoxy sp‐C—H…O,O′ interaction, while the structure of the dibutoxy analogue is dominated by planar ribbons of molecules linked by a similar bifurcated alkoxy sp‐C—H…O,O′ interaction. In contrast, the dipentoxy analogue forms ribbons of molecules alternately connected by a self‐complementary sp‐C—H…O₂N interaction and a self‐complementary sp²‐C—H…O₂N interaction. Disordered solvent was included in the crystals of 1‐ethynyl‐2‐nitro‐4,5‐dipropoxybenzene and its contribution was removed during refinement.     

Crystal structures,packing features,Hirshfeld surface analyses and DFT calculations of hydrogen‐bond energy of two homologous 8a‐aryl‐2,3,4,7,8,8a‐hexahydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]pyrimidin‐6(1H)‐ones

The crystal structures and packing features of two homologous Meyer's bicyclic lactams with fused pyrrolidone and medium‐sized perhydropyrimidine rings, namely, 8a‐phenyl‐2,3,4,7,8,8a‐hexahydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]pyrimidin‐6(1H)‐one, C₁₃H₁₆N₂O ( 1 ), and 8a‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐2,3,4,7,8,8a‐hexahydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]pyrimidin‐6(1H)‐one, C₁₄H₁₈N₂O ( 2 ), were elucidated, and Hirshfeld surface plots were calculated and drawn for visualization and a deeper analysis of the intermolecular noncovalent interactions. Molecules of 1 and 2 are weakly linked by intermolecular C=O…H—N hydrogen bonds into chains, which are in turn weakly linked by other C=O…H—C_ar interactions. The steric volume of the substituent significantly affects the crystal packing pattern.     

π‐stacking and C—X...D (X = H,NO2; D = O, π) interactions in the crystal network of both C—H...N and π‐stacked dimers of 1,2‐bis(4‐bromophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole and 2‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole

Molecules of 1,2‐bis(4‐bromophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole, C₁₉H₁₂Br₂N₂, (I), and 2‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole, C₁₉H₁₂BrN₃O₂, (II), are arranged in dimeric units through C—H...N and parallel‐displaced π‐stacking interactions favoured by the appropriate disposition of N‐ and C‐bonded phenyl rings with respect to the mean benzimidazole plane. The molecular packing of the dimers of (I) and (II) arises by the concurrence of a diverse set of weak intermolecular C—X...D (X = H, NO₂; D = O, π) interactions.