Récréations et mathématiques mondaines au XVIII siècle: le cas de Guyot

In this paper, we study the most popular book of recreational mathematics published in the second half of the 18th century: The Nouvelles Récréations by Guyot. We indicate the motivations of the author, a simple postman, and the conditions which led him to write this book. We describe the spirit of the book and the public at which it aims. The success of the Nouvelles Récréations illustrates the rise of a science in polite society whose main goal is to amaze and amuse. Then, we examine the place of mathematics in this project and analyze the repertoire of problems and tricks. We focus on problems of combinatorics proposed by Guyot, like anagrams and card shuffles, which inspired some real mathematical work on the part of Monge and Gergonne.     

Modular arithmetic before C.F. Gauss: Systematizations and discussions on remainder problems in 18th-century Germany

Remainder problems have a long tradition and were widely disseminated in books on calculation, algebra, and recreational mathematics from the 13th century until the 18th century. Many singular solution methods for particular cases were known, but Bachet de Méziriac was the first to see how these methods connected with the Euclidean algorithm and with Diophantine analysis (1624). His general solution method contributed to the theory of equations in France, but went largely unnoticed elsewhere. Later Euler independently rediscovered similar methods, while von Clausberg generalized and systematized methods that used the greatest common divisor procedure. These were followed by Euler's and Lagrange's continued fraction solution methods and Hindenburg's combinatorial solution. Shortly afterwards, Gauss, in the Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, proposed a new formalism based on his method of congruences and created the modular arithmetic framework in which these problems are posed today.     

Une ambition éditoriale “universelle et confraternelle” : le bulletin bibliographique de L'Enseignement mathématique (1899–1920)

In 1899 Henri Fehr and Charles Laisant founded L'Enseignement mathématique (EM) with the ambition to involve teachers in the then-growing internationalization movement of mathematics. To this purpose, their editorial project gave an important place to a bibliographical bulletin reviewing periodicals which could be of interest for the world of mathematical education. This article is dedicated to the study of this bulletin, from its creation to the 1920s, and to the initiatives and choices that Laisant and Fehr made to carry out this internationalist editorial ambition, as well as to the limits and constraints of their project. During that time, many bibliographical initiatives for periodicals developed in the mathematical press, which can be considered as a first form of interaction between journals. Our study will concern initially the year 1899 and this interaction in which EM took part, dealing at first with the bulletin of EM, then, secondly, with the confrontation between bibliographical sections of other journals. Lastly, considering the first thirty years of the 20th century, we will study the different dynamics at work in the world of mathematical periodicals which the EM serves to depict.     

Die Habilitation von John von Neumann an der Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität in Berlin: Urteile über einen ungarisch-jüdischen Mathematiker in Deutschland im Jahr 1927

The mathematician John von Neumann was born in Hungary but principally received his scientific education and socialization in the German science system. He received his Habilitation from the Friedrich-Wilhelms–Universität in Berlin in 1927, where he lectured as a Privatdozent until his emigration to the USA. This article aims at making a contribution to this early part of Neumann’s scientific biography by analyzing in detail the procedure that led to his Habilitation as well as the beginnings of Neumann’s research on functional analysis. An analysis of the relevant sources shows that in Berlin in the year 1927 Neumann was not yet regarded as the outstanding mathematical genius of the 20th century. Furthermore it will be seen that Neumann had great difficulties in developing the fundamental concepts for his path breaking work in spectral theory and only managed to do so with the support of the Berlin mathematician Erhard Schmidt.     

W.W. Rouse Ball and the mathematics of string figures

This article examines a chapter of the popular book Mathematical Recreations and Essays (5th to 9th editions) written by the Cambridge mathematician Walter William Rouse Ball (1850–1925). This chapter is devoted to “String Figures”, a procedural activity which consists in producing geometrical forms with a loop of string and which is carried out in many traditional societies throughout the world. By analyzing the way in which Ball selected some string figures within ethnographical publications and conceived the structure of this chapter, it appears that he implicitly brought to light the mathematical dimension of this practice.     

The evolution of the concept of homeomorphism

Topology, or analysis situs, has often been regarded as the study of those properties of point sets (in Euclidean space or in abstract spaces) that are invariant under “homeomorphisms.” Besides the modern concept of homeomorphism, at least three other concepts were used in this context during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and regarded (by various mathematicians) as characterizing topology: deformations, diffeomorphisms, and continuous bijections. Poincaré, in particular, characterized analysis situs in terms of deformations in 1892 but in terms of diffeomorphisms in 1895. Eventually Kuratowski showed in 1921 that in the plane there can be a continuous bijection of P onto Q, and of Q onto P, without P and Q being homeomorphic.     

Renaissance notions of number and magnitude

In the 16th and 17th centuries the classical Greek notions of (discrete) number and (continuous) magnitude (preserved in medieval Latin translations of Euclid's Elements) underwent a major transformation that turned them into continuous but measurable magnitudes. This article studies the changes introduced in the classical notions of number and magnitude by three influential Renaissance editions of Euclid's Elements. Besides providing evidence of earlier discussions preparing notions and arguments eventually introduced in Simon Stevin's Arithmétique of 1585, these editions document the role abacus algebra and Renaissance views on the history of mathematics played in bridging the gulf between discrete numbers and continuous magnitudes.     

The emergence of open sets,closed sets,and limit points in analysis and topology

General topology has its roots in real and complex analysis, which made important uses of the interrelated concepts of open set, of closed set, and of a limit point of a set. This article examines how those three concepts emerged and evolved during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, thanks especially to Weierstrass, Cantor, and Lebesgue. Particular attention is paid to the different forms of the Bolzano–Weierstrass Theorem found in the latter's unpublished lectures. An abortive early, unpublished introduction of open sets by Dedekind is examined, as well as how Peano and Jordan almost introduced that concept. At the same time we study the interplay of those three concepts (together with those of the closure of a set and of the derived set of a set) in the struggle to determine the ultimate foundations on which general topology was built, during the first half of the 20th century.     

Simplifying equations in Arabic algebra

Historians have always seen jabr (restoration) and muqābala (confrontation) as technical terms for specific operations in Arabic algebra. This assumption clashes with the fact that the words were used in a variety of contexts. By examining the different uses of jabr, muqābala, ikmāl (completion), and radd (returning) in the worked-out problems of several medieval mathematics texts, we show that they are really nontechnical words used to name the immediate goals of particular steps. We also find that the phrase al-jabr wa'l-muqābala was first used within the solutions of problems to mean al-jabr and/or al-muqābala, and from there it became the name of the art of algebra.     

Algebra in Roth,Faulhaber, and Descartes

Descartes' “multiplicative” theory of equations in the Géométrie (1637) systematically treats equations as polynomials set equal to zero, bringing out relations between equations, roots, and polynomial factors. We here consider this theory as a response to Peter Roth's suggestions in Arithmetica Philosophica (1608), notably in his “seventh-degree” problem set. These specimens of arithmetic-masterly problem design develop skills with multiplicative and other degree-independent techniques. The challenges were fine-tuned by introducing errors disguised as printing errors. During Descartes' visit to Germany in 1619–1622, he probably worked with Johann Faulhaber (1580–1635) on these problems; they are discussed in Faulhaber's Miracula Arithmetica (1622), which also looks forward to fuller publication, probably by Descartes.     

Comparative analysis in Greek geometry

This article is a contribution to our knowledge of ancient Greek geometric analysis. We investigate a type of theoretic analysis, not previously recognized by scholars, in which the mathematician uses the techniques of ancient analysis to determine whether an assumed relation is greater than, equal to, or less than. In the course of this investigation, we argue that theoretic analysis has a different logical structure than problematic analysis, and hence should not be divided into Hankel’s four-part structure. We then make clear how a comparative analysis is related to, and different from, a standard theoretic analysis. We conclude with some arguments that the theoretic analyses in our texts, both comparative and standard, should be regarded as evidence for a body of heuristic techniques.     

The Kujang sulhae 九章術解: Nam Pyoˇng-Gil’s reinterpretation of the mathematical methods of the Jiuzhang suanshu

In this article, a discussion and analysis is presented of the Kujang sulhae by Nam Pyoˇng-Gil (1820-1869), a 19th-century Korean commentary on the Jiuzhang suanshu. Nam copied the problems and procedures from the ancient Chinese classic, but replaced Liu Hui’s and Li Chunfeng’s commentaries with his own. In his postface Nam expressed his dissatisfaction with the earlier commentaries, because the approaches of Liu and Li did not match those of his contemporary readers well. This can be seen from the most important features of Nam’s commentary: the use of a synthesis of European and Chinese mathematical methods, easy explanations appealing to intuition, and disuse of the methods of infinitesimals and limits in Liu’s and Li’s commentaries. Based on his own postface and these features of his commentary, I believe that Nam Pyoˇng-Gil treated the Jiuzhang suanshu as a very important historical document, which he intended to explain according to the new mathematical canon in both Qing China and Chosoˇn Korea, the Shuli jingyun. Thus the Kujang sulhae is an example of the endeavor of 19th-century Korean mathematicians to reinterpret ancient Chinese mathematical texts with their contemporary knowledge.     

Convergence and formal manipulation in the theory of series from 1730 to 1815

In the early calculus mathematicians used convergent series to represent geometrical quantities and solve geometrical problems. However, series were also manipulated formally using procedures that were the infinitary extension of finite procedures. By the 1720s results were being published that could not be reduced to the original conceptions of convergence and geometrical representation. This situation led Euler to develop explicitly a more formal approach which generalized the early theory. Formal analysis, which was predominant during the second half of the 18th century despite criticisms of it by some researchers, contributed to the enlargement of mathematics and even led to a new branch of analysis: the calculus of operations. However, formal methods could not give an adequate treatment of trigonometric series and series that were not the expansions of elementary functions. The need to use trigonometric series and introduce nonelementary functions led Fourier and Gauss to reject the formal concept of series and adopt a different, purely quantitative notion of series.     

The dramatic episode of Sundman

In 1912 the Finnish mathematical astronomer Karl Sundman published a remarkable solution to the three-body problem, of a type that mathematicians such as Poincaré had believed impossible to achieve. Although lauded at the time, the result dimmed from view as the 20th century progressed and its significance was often overlooked. This article traces Sundman’s career and the path to his achievement, bringing to light the involvement of Ernst Lindelöf and Gösta Mittag-Leffler in Sundman’s research and professional development, and including an examination of the reception over time of Sundman’s result. A broader perspective on Sundman’s research is provided by short discussions of two of Sundman’s later papers: his contribution to Klein’s Encyklopädie and his design for a calculating machine for astronomy.     

Cube root extraction in medieval mathematics

The algorithms used in Arabic and medieval European mathematics for extracting cube roots are studied with respect to algebraic structure and use of external memory (dust board, table, paper). They can be separated into two distinct groups. One contains methods used in the eastern regions from the 11th century, closely connected to Chinese techniques, and very uniform in structure. The other group, showing much wider variation, contains early Indian methods and techniques developed in central and western parts of the Arabic areas and in Europe. This study supports hypotheses previously formulated by Luckey and Chemla on an early scientific connection between China and Persia.     

Varieties of wonder:: John Wilkins' mathematical magic and the perpetuity of invention

Akin to the mathematical recreations, John Wilkins' Mathematicall Magick ( 1648) elaborates the pleasant, useful and wondrous part of practical mathematics, dealing in particular with its material culture of machines and instruments. We contextualize the Mathematicall Magick by studying its institutional setting and its place within changing conceptions of art, nature, religion and mathematics. We devote special attention to the way Wilkins inscribes mechanical innovations within a discourse of wonder. Instead of treating ‘wonder’ as a monolithic category, we present a typology, showing that wonders were not only recreative, but were meant to inspire Wilkins' readers to new mathematical inventions.