Total restrained domination numbers of trees

For a given connected graph G=(V,E), a set D_tr⊆V(G) is a total restrained dominating set if it is dominating and both 〈D_tr〉 and 〈V(G)-D_tr〉 do not contain isolate vertices. The cardinality of the minimum total restrained dominating set in G is the total restrained domination number and is denoted by γ_tr(G). In this paper we characterize the trees with equal total and total restrained dominating numbers and give a lower bound on the total restrained dominating number of a tree T in terms of its order and the number of leaves of T.     

A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

On graphs with equal domination and 2-domination numbers

Let G be a simple graph, and let p be a positive integer. A subset D⊆V(G) is a p-dominating set of the graph G, if every vertex v∈V(G)-D is adjacent to at least p vertices in D. The p-domination numberγ_p(G) is the minimum cardinality among the p-dominating sets of G. Note that the 1-domination number γ₁(G) is the usual domination numberγ(G). This definition immediately leads to the inequality γ(G)?γ₂(G).In this paper we present some sufficient as well as some necessary conditions for graphs G with the property that γ₂(G)=γ(G). In particular, we characterize all cactus graphs H with γ₂(H)=γ(H).     

Global secure sets of grid-like graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph and S⊆V. The set S is a secure set if ∀X⊆S,|N[X]∩S|≥|N[X]−S|, and S is a global secure set if S is a secure set and a dominating set. The cardinality of a minimum global secure set of G is the global security number of G, denoted γ_s(G). The sets studied in this paper are different from secure dominating sets studied in Cockayne et al. (2003) [3], Grobler and Mynhardt (2009) [8], or Klostermeyer and Mynhardt (2008) [13], which are also denoted by γ_s.In this paper, we provide results on the global security numbers of paths, cycles and their Cartesian products.     

An upper bound for the restrained domination number of a graph with minimum degree at least two in terms of order and minimum degree

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S⊆V is a restrained dominating set if every vertex in V−S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V−S. The restrained domination number of G, denoted γ_r(G), is the smallest cardinality of a restrained dominating set of G. We will show that if G is a connected graph of order n and minimum degree δ and not isomorphic to one of nine exceptional graphs, then .     

A note on acyclic domination number in graphs of diameter two

A subset S of the vertex set of a graph G is called acyclic if the subgraph it induces in G contains no cycles. S is called an acyclic dominating set of G if it is both acyclic and dominating. The minimum cardinality of an acyclic dominating set, denoted by γ_a(G), is called the acyclic domination number of G. Hedetniemi et al. [Acyclic domination, Discrete Math. 222 (2000) 151-165] introduced the concept of acyclic domination and posed the following open problem: if δ(G) is the minimum degree of G, is γ_a(G)?δ(G) for any graph whose diameter is two? In this paper, we provide a negative answer to this question by showing that for any positive k, there is a graph G with diameter two such that γ_a(G)-δ(G)?k.     

On the bondage number of middle graphs

Let G = (V (G),E(G)) be a simple graph. A subset S of V (G) is a dominating set of G if, for any vertex v ∈ V (G) — S, there exists some vertex u ∈ S such that uv ∈ E(G). The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the cardinality of a minimal dominating set of G. There are several types of domination parameters depending upon the nature of domination and the nature of dominating set. These parameters are bondage, reinforcement, strong-weak domination, strong-weak bondage numbers. In this paper, we first investigate the strong-weak domination number of middle graphs of a graph. Then several results for the bondage, strong-weak bondage number of middle graphs are obtained.     

The hull and geodetic numbers of orientations of graphs

For an oriented graph D, let I_D[u,v] denote the set of all vertices lying on a u-v geodesic or a v-u geodesic. For S⊆V(D), let I_D[S] denote the union of all I_D[u,v] for all u,v∈S. Let [S]_D denote the smallest convex set containing S. The geodetic number g(D) of an oriented graph D is the minimum cardinality of a set S with I_D[S]=V(D) and the hull number h(D) of an oriented graph D is the minimum cardinality of a set S with [S]_D=V(D). For a connected graph G, let O(G) be the set of all orientations of G, define g⁻(G)=min{g(D):D∈O(G)}, g⁺(G)=max{g(D):D∈O(G)}, h⁻(G)=min{h(D):D∈O(G)}, and h⁺(G)=max{h(D):D∈O(G)}. By the above definitions, h⁻(G)≤g⁻(G) and h⁺(G)≤g⁺(G). In the paper, we prove that g⁻(G)<h⁺(G) for a connected graph G of order at least 3, and for any nonnegative integers a and b, there exists a connected graph G such that g⁻(G)−h⁻(G)=a and g⁺(G)−h⁺(G)=b. These results answer a problem of Farrugia in [A. Farrugia, Orientable convexity, geodetic and hull numbers in graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 148 (2005) 256-262].     

On equality in an upper bound for the restrained and total domination numbers of a graph

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S⊆V is a restrained dominating set (RDS) if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V?S. The restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_r(G), is the minimum cardinality of an RDS of G. A set S⊆V is a total dominating set (TDS) if every vertex in V is adjacent to a vertex in S. The total domination number of a graph G without isolated vertices, denoted by γ_t(G), is the minimum cardinality of a TDS of G.Let δ and Δ denote the minimum and maximum degrees, respectively, in G. If G is a graph of order n with δ?2, then it is shown that γ_r(G)?n-Δ, and we characterize the connected graphs with δ?2 achieving this bound that have no 3-cycle as well as those connected graphs with δ?2 that have neither a 3-cycle nor a 5-cycle. Cockayne et al. [Total domination in graphs, Networks 10 (1980) 211-219] showed that if G is a connected graph of order n?3 and Δ?n-2, then γ_t(G)?n-Δ. We further characterize the connected graphs G of order n?3 with Δ?n-2 that have no 3-cycle and achieve γ_t(G)=n-Δ.     

Distance paired domination numbers of graphs

In this paper, we study a generalization of the paired domination number. Let G=(V,E) be a graph without an isolated vertex. A set D⊆V(G) is a k-distance paired dominating set of G if D is a k-distance dominating set of G and the induced subgraph 〈D〉 has a perfect matching. The k-distance paired domination number is the cardinality of a smallest k-distance paired dominating set of G. We investigate properties of the k-distance paired domination number of a graph. We also give an upper bound and a lower bound on the k-distance paired domination number of a non-trivial tree T in terms of the size of T and the number of leaves in T and we also characterize the extremal trees.     

The exact domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if every vertex u∈V−S is dominated by some vertex v∈S. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. For the generalized Petersen graph G(n), Behzad et al. [A. Behzad, M. Behzad, C.E. Praeger, On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs, Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 603-610] proved that and conjectured that the upper bound is the exact domination number. In this paper we prove this conjecture.     

A note on the weakly convex and convex domination numbers of a torus

The distanced_G(u,v) between two vertices u and v in a connected graph G is the length of the shortest (u,v) path in G. A (u,v) path of length d_G(u,v) is called a (u,v)-geodesic. A set X⊆V is called weakly convex in G if for every two vertices a,b∈X, exists an (a,b)-geodesic, all of whose vertices belong to X. A set X is convex in G if for all a,b∈X all vertices from every (a,b)-geodesic belong to X. The weakly convex domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a weakly convex dominating set of G, while the convex domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a convex dominating set of G. In this paper we consider weakly convex and convex domination numbers of tori.     

Factor-critical property in 3-dominating-critical graphs

A vertex subset S of a graph G is a dominating set if every vertex of G either belongs to S or is adjacent to a vertex of S. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set is called the dominating number of G and is denoted by γ(G). A graph G is said to be γ-vertex-critical if γ(G−v)<γ(G), for every vertex v in G.Let G be a 2-connected K_1,5-free 3-vertex-critical graph of odd order. For any vertex v∈V(G), we show that G−v has a perfect matching (except two graphs), which solves a conjecture posed by Ananchuen and Plummer [N. Ananchuen, M.D. Plummer, Matchings in 3-vertex critical graphs: The odd case, Discrete Math., 307 (2007) 1651-1658].     

On global domination critical graphs

A dominating set of a graph G=(V,E) is a subset S⊆V such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to at least one vertex of S. The domination number of G is the cardinality of a smallest dominating set. The global domination number, γ_g(G), is the cardinality of a smallest set S that is simultaneously a dominating set of both G and its complement . Graphs for which γ_g(G−e)>γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E are characterized, as are graphs for which γ_g(G−e)<γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E whenever is disconnected. Progress is reported in the latter case when is connected.     

A Note on the Roman Bondage Number of Planar Graphs

A Roman dominating function on a graph G = (V(G), E(G)) is a labelling ${f : V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}}$ satisfying the condition that every vertex with label 0 has at least a neighbour with label 2. The Roman domination number γ _R (G) of G is the minimum of ${\sum_{v \in V(G)}{f(v)}}$ over all such functions. The Roman bondage number b _R (G) of G is the minimum cardinality of all sets ${E\subseteq E(G)}$ for which γ _R (G \ E) > γ _R (G). Recently, it was proved that for every planar graph P, b _R (P) ≤ Δ(P) + 6, where Δ(P) is the maximum degree of P. We show that the Roman bondage number of every planar graph does not exceed 15 and construct infinitely many planar graphs with Roman bondage number equal to 7.     

An upper bound on the domination number of a graph with minimum degree 2

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex of V(G)?S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G is the domination number of G, denoted as γ(G). Let P_n and C_n denote a path and a cycle, respectively, on n vertices. Let k₁(F) and k₂(F) denote the number of components of a graph F that are isomorphic to a graph in the family {P₃,P₄,P₅,C₅} and {P₁,P₂}, respectively. Let L be the set of vertices of G of degree more than 2, and let G−L be the graph obtained from G by deleting the vertices in L and all edges incident with L. McCuaig and Shepherd [W. McCuaig, B. Shepherd, Domination in graphs with minimum degree two, J. Graph Theory 13 (1989) 749-762] showed that if G is a connected graph of order n≥8 with δ(G)≥2, then γ(G)≤2n/5, while Reed [B.A. Reed, Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996) 277-295] showed that if G is a graph of order n with δ(G)≥3, then γ(G)≤3n/8. As an application of Reed’s result, we show that if G is a graph of order n≥14 with δ(G)≥2, then .     

A constructive characterization of total domination vertex critical graphs

Let G be a graph of order n and maximum degree Δ(G) and let γ_t(G) denote the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of a graph G. A graph G with no isolated vertex is the total domination vertex critical if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, the total domination number of G−v is less than the total domination number of G. We call these graphs γ_t-critical. For any γ_t-critical graph G, it can be shown that n≤Δ(G)(γ_t(G)−1)+1. In this paper, we prove that: Let G be a connected γ_t-critical graph of order n (n≥3), then n=Δ(G)(γ_t(G)−1)+1 if and only if G is regular and, for each v∈V(G), there is an A⊆V(G)−{v} such that N(v)∩A=0?, the subgraph induced by A is 1-regular, and every vertex in V(G)−A−{v} has exactly one neighbor in A.     

Secure domination critical graphs

A secure dominating set X of a graph G is a dominating set with the property that each vertex u∈V_G−X is adjacent to a vertex v∈X such that (X−{v})∪{u} is dominating. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the secure domination number, denoted by γ_s(G). We are interested in the effect of edge removal on γ_s(G), and characterize γ_s-ER-critical graphs, i.e. graphs for which γ_s(G−e)>γ_s(G) for any edge e of G, bipartite γ_s-ER-critical graphs and γ_s-ER-critical trees.