The Electronic Ground State of [Fe(CO)3(NO)]−: A Spectroscopic and Theoretical Study

During the past 10 years iron‐catalyzed reactions have become established in the field of organic synthesis. For example, the complex anion [Fe(CO)₃(NO)]^?, which was originally described by Hogsed and Hieber, shows catalytic activity in various organic reactions. This anion is commonly regarded as being isoelectronic with [Fe(CO)₄]^2?, which, however, shows poor catalytic activity. The spectroscopic and quantum chemical investigations presented herein reveal that the complex ferrate [Fe(CO)₃(NO)]^? cannot be regarded as a Fe^?II species, but rather is predominantly a Fe⁰ species, in which the metal is covalently bonded to NO^? by two π‐bonds. A metal–N σ‐bond is not observed.     

H2 Formation on Cosmic Grain Siliceous Surfaces Grafted with Fe+: A Silsesquioxanes‐Based Computational Model

Cosmic siliceous dust grains are involved in the synthesis of H₂ in the inter‐stellar medium. In this work, the dust grain siliceous surface is represented by a hydrogen Fe‐metalla‐silsesquioxane model of general formula: [Fe(H₇Si₇O_12?n)(OH)_n]⁺ (n=0,1,2) where Fe⁺ behaves like a single‐site heterogeneous catalyst grafted on a siliceous surface synthesizing H₂ from H. A computational analysis is performed using two levels of theory (B3LYP‐D3BJ and MP2‐F12) to quantify the thermodynamic driving force of the reaction: [Fe‐T7H₇]⁺+4H→[Fe‐T7H₇(OH)₂]⁺+H₂. The general outcomes are: 1) H₂ synthesis is thermodynamically strongly favored; 2) Fe‐H / Fe‐H₂ barrier‐less formation potential; 3) chemisorbed H‐Fe leads to facile H₂ synthesis at 20≤T≤100 K; 4) relative spin energetics and thermodynamic quantities between the B3LYP‐D3BJ and MP2‐F12 levels of theory are in qualitative agreement. The metalla‐silsesquioxane model shows how Fe⁺ fixed on a siliceous surface can potentially catalyze H₂ formation in space.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Syntheses,crystal structures and magnetic properties of two cyano-bridged two-dimensional assemblies [Fe(salpn)]2 [Fe(CN)5NO] and [Fe(salpn)]2[Ni(CN)4]

Two cyano-bridged assemblies, [Fe^III(salpn)]₂[Fe^II(CN)₅NO] (1) and [Fe^III (salpn)]₂[Ni^II(CN)₄] (2) [salpn = N, N-1,2-propylenebis(salicylideneiminato)dianion], have been prepared and structurally and magnetically characterized. In each complex, [Fe(CN)₅NO]^2– or [Ni(CN)₄]^2– coordinates with four [Fe(salpn)]⁺ cations using four co-planar CN^– ligands, whereas each [Fe(salpn)]⁺ links two [Fe(CN)₅NO]^2– or [Ni(CN)₄]^2– ions in the trans form, which results in a two-dimensional (2D) network consisting of pillow-like octanuclear [—M^II—CN—Fe^III—NC—]₄ units (M = Fe or Ni). In complex (1), the NO group of [Fe(CN)₅NO]^2– remains monodentate and the bond angle of Fe^II—N—O is 180.0°. The variable temperature magnetic susceptibilities, measured in the 5–300 K range, show weak intralayer antiferromagnetic interactions in both complexes with the intramolecular iron(III)iron(III) exchange integrals of –0.017 cm^–1 for (1) and –0.020 cm^–1 for (2), respectively.     

Nitrosylation of Nitric‐Oxide‐Sensing Regulatory Proteins Containing [4Fe‐4S] Clusters Gives Rise to Multiple Iron–Nitrosyl Complexes

The reaction of protein‐bound iron–sulfur (Fe‐S) clusters with nitric oxide (NO) plays key roles in NO‐mediated toxicity and signaling. Elucidation of the mechanism of the reaction of NO with DNA regulatory proteins that contain Fe‐S clusters has been hampered by a lack of information about the nature of the iron‐nitrosyl products formed. Herein, we report nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopy (NRVS) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations that identify NO reaction products in WhiD and NsrR, regulatory proteins that use a [4Fe‐4S] cluster to sense NO. This work reveals that nitrosylation yields multiple products structurally related to Roussin's Red Ester (RRE, [Fe₂(NO)₄(Cys)₂]) and Roussin's Black Salt (RBS, [Fe₄(NO)₇S₃]. In the latter case, the absence of ³²S/³⁴S shifts in the Fe?S region of the NRVS spectra suggest that a new species, Roussin's Black Ester (RBE), may be formed, in which one or more of the sulfide ligands is replaced by Cys thiolates.     

Mössbauer study of paramagnetic relaxation effect in mixed crystals: High spin Fe3+ compounds diluted in diamagnetic hosts

The⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectra were measured in mixed crystals with different types of chemical bonding and crystal structure, i.e., (Fe,Al)(acac)₃, (Fe,Co)(acac)₃, K₃[(Fe,Al)(ox)₃]3H₂O, and NH₄(Fe,Al)(SO₄)₂12H₂O. The broadening of Mössbauer linewidth with increasing Fe³⁺–Fe³⁺ distance became less enhanced in the order: (Fe,Al)(acac)₃>(Fe,Co)(acac)₃, or K₃[(Fe,Al)(ox)₃]3H₂O>(Fe,Al)(acac)₃>NH₄(Fe,Al)(SO₄)₂12H₂O. Furthermore, it was found that the broadening of the linewidth was larger in neat tris (-diketonato) iron(III) complexes than in (Fe,Al)(acac)₃. Based on these results, the determining factors of the paramagnetic relaxation time other than Fe³⁺–Fe³⁺ distance and temperature were examined in terms of the Mössbauer linewidth as an indicator.     

K6[Fe8.27(HPO3)12]: a new mixed‐valence iron phosphite

The title compound, hexapotassium octairon(II,III) dodecaphosphonate, exhibiting a two‐dimensional structure, is a new mixed alkali/3d metal phosphite. It crystallizes in the space group Rm, with two crystallographically independent Fe atoms occupying sites of m (Fe1) and 3m (Fe2) symmetry. The Fe2 site is fully occupied, whereas the Fe1 site presents an occupancy factor of 0.757 (3). The three independent O atoms, one of which is disordered, are situated on a mirror and all other atoms are located on special positions with 3m symmetry. Layers of formula [Fe₃(HPO₃)₄]²⁻ are observed in the structure, formed by linear Fe₃O₁₂ trimer units, which contain face‐sharing FeO₆ octahedra interconnected by (HPO₃)²⁻ phosphite oxoanions. The partial occupancy of the Fe1 site might be described by the formation of two [Fe(HPO₃)₂]⁻ layers derived from the [Fe₃(HPO₃)₄]²⁻ layer when the Fe1 atom is absent. Fe²⁺ is localized at the Fe1 and Fe2 sites of the [Fe₃(HPO₃)₄]²⁻ sheets, whereas Fe³⁺ is found at the Fe2 sites of the [Fe(HPO₃)₂]⁻ sheets, according to bond‐valence calculations. The K⁺ cations are located in the interlayer spaces, between the [Fe₃(HPO₃)₄]²⁻ layers, and between the [Fe₃(HPO₃)₄]²⁻ and [Fe(HPO₃)₂]⁻ layers.     

Fe6.67(PO4)5.35(HPO4)0.65 and Fe6.23(PO4)4.45(HPO4)1.55: two new mixed‐valence iron phosphates

Two new mixed‐valence iron phosphates, namely heptairon pentaphosphate hydrogen phosphate, Fe_6.67(PO₄)_5.35(HPO₄)_0.65, and heptairon tetraphosphate bis(hydrogen phosphate), Fe_6.23(PO₄)_4.45(HPO₄)_1.55, have been synthesized hydrothermally at 973 K and 0.1 GPa. The structures are similar to that of Fe^II₃Fe^III₄(PO₄)₆ and are characterized by infinite chains of Fe polyhedra parallel to the [101] direction. These chains are formed by the Fe1O₆ and Fe2O₆ octahedra, alternating with the Fe4O₅ distorted pentagonal bipyramids, according to the stacking sequence ...Fe1–Fe1–Fe4–Fe2–Fe2.... The Fe3O₆ octahedra and PO₄ tetrahedra connect the chains together. Fe^II is localized on the Fe3 and Fe4 sites, whereas Fe^III is found in the Fe1 and Fe2 sites, according to bond‐valence calculations. Refined site occupancies indicate the presence of vacancies on the Fe4 site, explained by the substitution mechanism Fe^II + 2(PO₄³⁻) = vacancies + 2(HPO₄²⁻).     

Reactions of bis-μ-iodo-bis(dinitrosyliron) with halide ions and with thiols: An electron paramagnetic resonance study

Solutions of Fe₂(NO)₄I₂ in DMF exhibit EPR spectra characteristic of [Fe(NO)₂]⁺ at concentrations of 2 x 10^?4 mol dm^?3, and of an equilibrium mixture of [Fe(NO)₂⁺, Fe(NO)₂I, and [Fe(NO)₂I₂]^? at higher concentrations: in THF solutions only Fe(NO)₂I is observed, regardless of concentration. Addition of excess halide ions X^? (X=Cl, Br, I) to the DMF solution yields [Fe(NO)₂X₂]^?, but addition of excess I^? or Br^? to the THF solution yields [Fe(NO)₂I₂^? or Fe₂(NO)₄Br₂ respectively. In mixed THF/Et₃N solutions, mixtures of [Fe(NO)₂]⁺, Fe(NO)₂I, and [Fe(NO)₂I₂]^? are again formed, and subsequent addition of a thiol RSH causes formation of [Fe(NO)₂(SR)₂]^?, a precursor of Fe₂(NO)₄(SR)₂. A scheme is suggested to describe the steps in the preparatively useful conversion of Fe₂(NO)₄I₂ into Fe₂(NO)₄(SR)₂.     

Formation of paramagnetic mononuclear iron nitrosyl complexes from diamagnetic di- and tetranuclear iron-sulphur nitrosyls: characterisation by EPR spectroscopy and study of thiolate and nitrosyl ligand exchange reactions

The diamagnetic Roussin esters Fe₂(SR)₂(NO)₄ readily underwent exchange with thiols R′SH to yield Fe₂(SR′)₂(NO)₄: the exchange was faster in polar, coordinating solvents where paramagnetic, mononuclear complexes of types [Fe(NO)₂(solvent)₂]⁺ and Fe(NO) ₂(SR)(solvent) were formed. With the corresponding thiolate anions RS^-, the esters Fe₂(SR)₂(NO)₄ formed the mononuclear complexes [Fe(SR)₂(NO)₂]^-, which were fully characterised by EPR spectroscopy for R = H, Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu and PhCH₂: assignments of hyperfine couplings were confirmed by use of ¹⁵N. With Fe₂(SR)₂(NO)₄ and a different set of thiolate anion, R′S ^-, in excess, thiol exchange occurred to give [Fe(SR′)₂(NO)₂]^-. A mechanism for formation of Fe₂(SR′)₂(NO)₄ from Fe₂(SR)₂(NO)₄ has been proposed. The paramagnetic mononuclear complexes [Fe(SR)₂(NO)₂] were also readily formed from the diamagnetic clusters [Fe₄S₃(NO)₇]^- and Fe₄S₄(NO)₄, together with [Fe(SR)₃(NO)]^-, and additionally from [Fe(CO)₃NO]^-. [Fe(SMe)₂(NO)₂]^-. was found to be a precursor of isolable Fe₂(SMe)₂(NO)₄, and [Fe(SH)₂ (NO)₂]^- to be the common precursor of both Roussin′s red anion [Fe₂S₂(NO)₄]^- and Roussin's black anion [Fe₄S₃ (NO)₇]^- interconvertible by appropriate adjustment of pH. The nitrosyl groups in these complexes were freely labile, and mononitrosyliron and dinitrosyliron fragments were readily interconvertible: FE(NO) fragments were favoured by the dimethyldithiocarbamate ligand (Me₂NCS ₂) and Fe(NO)₂ fragments by thiolate ligands, RS^-, regardless of the origin of the Fe(NO)_x(x = 1,2) fragment: both mono- and dinitrosyliron complexes persisted with [(i-PrO)₂S₂]^- as ligand. Isotopic labelling showed the occurrence of rapid exchange of nitrogen between nitrosyl ligands and added nitrite in Fe(NO)(S₂CNMe₂)₂ and [Fe(SR)₂(NO)₂]^-     

Synthesis of Isotope Enriched (CN3H6)2[57Fe(CN)5NO] starting from 57Fe

A high‐yield, mmolar‐scale synthesis of pure guanidinium nitroprusside, (CN₃H₆)₂[⁽⁵⁷⁾Fe(CN)₅NO] (GNP) from iron metal is described. The iron metal contained pieces of 95.3% ⁵⁷Fe together with normal iron so that an isotope enrichment in ⁵⁷Fe of 25% was achieved. Single‐crystals of GNP could be grown in cubic shape and dimensions of about 3 × 4 × 4 mm³. The purity of the GNP product and the intermediates K₄[⁽⁵⁷⁾Fe(CN)₆] · 3 H₂O and Na₂[⁽⁵⁷⁾Fe(CN)₅NO] · 2 H₂O was ascertained by ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy as well as ¹³C, ¹⁴N and ⁵⁷Fe NMR spectroscopy. The ⁵⁷Fe NMR chemical shift for [⁽⁵⁷⁾Fe(CN)₅NO]^2– in GNP was detected at +2004.0 ppm [vs Fe(CO)₅].     

Unraveling the Mechanism of Water Oxidation Catalyzed by Nonheme Iron Complexes

Density functional theory (DFT) is employed to: 1) propose a viable catalytic cycle consistent with our experimental results for the mechanism of chemically driven (Ce^IV) O₂ generation from water, mediated by nonheme iron complexes; and 2) to unravel the role of the ligand on the nonheme iron catalyst in the water oxidation reaction activity. To this end, the key features of the water oxidation catalytic cycle for the highly active complexes [Fe(OTf)₂(Pytacn)] (Pytacn: 1‐(2′‐pyridylmethyl)‐4,7‐dimethyl‐1,4,7‐triazacyclononane; OTf: CF₃SO₃^?) ( 1 ) and [Fe(OTf)₂(mep)] (mep: N,N′‐bis(2‐pyridylmethyl)‐N,N′‐dimethyl ethane‐1,2‐diamine) ( 2 ) as well as for the catalytically inactive [Fe(OTf)₂(tmc)] (tmc: N,N′,N′′,N′′′‐tetramethylcyclam) ( 3 ) and [Fe(NCCH₃)(^MePy₂CH‐tacn)](OTf)₂ (^MePy₂CH‐tacn: N‐(dipyridin‐2‐yl)methyl)‐N′,N′′‐dimethyl‐1,4,7‐triazacyclononane) ( 4 ) were analyzed. The DFT computed catalytic cycle establishes that the resting state under catalytic conditions is a [Fe^IV(O)(OH₂)(LN₄)]²⁺ species (in which LN₄=Pytacn or mep) and the rate‐determining step is the O?O bond‐formation event. This is nicely supported by the remarkable agreement between the experimental (ΔG^≠=17.6±1.6 kcal mol^?1) and theoretical (ΔG^≠=18.9 kcal mol^?1) activation parameters obtained for complex 1 . The O?O bond formation is performed by an iron(V) intermediate [Fe^V(O)(OH)(LN₄)]²⁺ containing a cis‐Fe^V(O)(OH) unit. Under catalytic conditions (Ce^IV, pH 0.8) the high oxidation state Fe^V is only thermodynamically accessible through a proton‐coupled electron‐transfer (PCET) process from the cis‐[Fe^IV(O)(OH₂)(LN₄)]²⁺ resting state. Formation of the [Fe^V(O)(LN₄)]³⁺ species is thermodynamically inaccessible for complexes 3 and 4 . Our results also show that the cis‐labile coordinative sites in iron complexes have a beneficial key role in the O?O bond‐formation process. This is due to the cis‐OH ligand in the cis‐Fe^V(O)(OH) intermediate that can act as internal base, accepting a proton concomitant to the O?O bond‐formation reaction. Interplay between redox potentials to achieve the high oxidation state (Fe^V?O) and the activation energy barrier for the following O?O bond formation appears to be feasible through manipulation of the coordination environment of the iron site. This control may have a crucial role in the future development of water oxidation catalysts based on iron.     

Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of the New Iron Thioantimonates(III) [Fe(C6H18N4)]FeSbS4 and [Fe(C4H13N3)2]Fe2Sb4S10 Containing FeII and FeIII and Protein‐Analogous [2FeIII‐2S]2+ Clusters

The two new compounds [Fe(tren)]FeSbS₄ ( 1 ) (tren = tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine) and [Fe(dien)₂]Fe₂Sb₄S₁₀ ( 2 ) (dien = diethylendiamine) were prepared under solvothermal conditions and represent the first thioantimonates(III) with iron cations integrated into the anionic network. In both compounds Fe³⁺ is part of a [2Fe^III‐2S] cluster which is often found in ferredoxines. In addition, Fe²⁺ ions are present which are surrounded by the organic ligands. In ( 1 ) the Fe²⁺ ion is also part of the thioantimonate(III) network whereas in ( 2 ) the Fe²⁺ ion is isolated. In both compounds the primary SbS₃ units are interconnected into one‐dimensional chains. The mixed‐valent character of [Fe(tren)]FeSbS₄ was unambiguously determined with Mössbauer spectroscopy. Both compounds exhibit paramagnetic behaviour and for ( 1 ) a deviation from linearity is observed due to a strong zero‐field splitting. Both compounds decompose in one single step.     

[Fe(H2O)5(NO)]2+, the “Brown‐Ring” Chromophore

Although the “brown‐ring” ion, [Fe(H₂O)₅(NO)]²⁺ ( 1 ), has been a research target for more than a century, this poorly stable species had never been isolated. We now report on the synthesis of crystals of a salt of 1 which allowed us to tackle the unique bonding situation on an experimental basis. As a result of the bonding analysis, two stretched, spin‐polarised π‐interactions provide the Fe–NO binding—and challenge the concept of “oxidation state”.     

57Fe 穆斯堡尔谱研究 Ir-Fe 催化剂用于 CO 选择氧化反应

 采用不同浸渍顺序制备了三种 Ir-Fe 催化剂, 其 CO 选择氧化 (PROX) 反应活性差别很大, 其中共浸渍的 Ir-Fe 催化剂活性最高. 吸附量热研究表明, 三种催化剂的 H2 和 CO 吸附存在差别. 通过对三种催化剂还原后、再氧化和反应后准原位 57Fe 穆斯堡尔谱的研究, 得到各种 Fe 物种信息. 结果表明, 三种制备方法影响催化剂中 Ir-Fe 相互作用强度, 导致催化剂中 Fe 物种的氧化还原性能不同. 催化剂中 Fe²⁺(a) 的含量与 CO 转化率呈正比关系, Fe²⁺(a) 是 PROX 反应过程中活化氧的活性中心. 浸渍顺序改变了 Ir-Fe 间相互作用强度, 从而改变 Fe²⁺(a) 物种含量, 影响 PROX 反应活性. Ir-Fe 间的相互作用可以稳定活化氧的 Fe²⁺(a) 物种, 为今后研究金属-金属间的相互作用提供借鉴.     

Solvent‐Free Ball‐Milling Subcomponent Synthesis of Metallosupramolecular Complexes

Subcomponent self‐assembly from components A , B , C , D , and Fe²⁺ under solvent‐free conditions by self‐sorting leads to the construction of three structurally different metallosupramolecular iron(II) complexes. Under carefully selected ball‐milling conditions, tetranuclear [Fe₄( AD ₂)₆]^4? 22‐component cage 1 , dinuclear [Fe₂( BD ₂)₃]^2? 11‐component helicate 2 , and 5‐component mononuclear [Fe( CD ₃)]²⁺ complex 3 were prepared simultaneously in a one‐pot reaction from 38 components. Through subcomponent substitution reaction by adding subcomponent B , the [Fe₄( AD ₂)₆]^4? cage converts quantitatively to the [Fe₂( BD ₂)₃]^2? helicate, which, in turn, upon addition of subcomponent C , transforms to [Fe( CD ₃)]²⁺, following the hierarchical preference based on the thermodynamic stability of the complexes.     

Stable Salts of Heteroleptic Iron Carbonyl/Nitrosyl Cations

The oxidation of Fe(CO)₅ with the [NO]⁺ salt of the weakly coordinating perfluoroalkoxyaluminate anion [F‐{Al(OR^F)₃}₂]^? (R^F=C(CF₃)₃) leads to stable salts of the 18 valence electron (VE) species [Fe(CO)₄(NO)]⁺ and [Fe(CO)(NO)₃]⁺ with the Enemark–Feltham numbers of {FeNO}⁸ and {FeNO}¹⁰. This finally concludes the triad of heteroleptic iron carbonyl/nitrosyl complexes, since the first discovery of the anionic ([Fe(CO)₃(NO)]^?) and neutral ([Fe(CO)₂(NO)₂]) species over 80 years ago. Both complexes were fully characterized (IR, Raman, NMR, UV/Vis, scXRD, pXRD) and are stable at room temperature under inert conditions over months and may serve as useful starting materials for further investigations.     

Reactivity of fac-[PPN][Fe(CO)3(TePh)3]: Structure of Fe2(μTePh)2(NO)4

Addition of NOBF₄ to fac-[PPN][Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₃] in THF at ambient temperature results in formation of Fe₂(μ-TePh)₂(NO)_4l Fe₂(?TePh)₂(CO)₆ and organic products. Methylation of fac-[PPN][Fe(CO)₃- (TePh)₃] by Mel or [Me₃O][BF₄] leads to the known dimer Fe₂(μ.-TePh)₂(CO)₆ and organic products. Fe₂(μ-TePh)₂(NO)₄ crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P bca, with a = 12.701(5) Å, b = 6.7935(16) Å, c = 21.299(9) Å, V = 1837.8(11) ų, and Z = 4. The core geometry of Fe₂(μ-TePh)₂(NO)₄ is best described as a Fe₂Te₂ planar rhombus with Te-Fe-Te bond angle 112.09(4)°. A Fe-Fe bond (length 2.827(2) Å) is proposed for Fe₂(μ-TePh)₂(NO)₄ on the basis of the 18-electron rule. The iron atom adopts a distorted tetrahedral geometry with acute bridge Fe-Te-Fe angles 67.91(3)°, and bridging Fe-Te bond of length 2.53(1) Å.     

A comparative study on the activity of metal exchanged MCM22 zeolite in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx

A series of MCM22 zeolites exchanged with copper and cobalt are studied for the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with C₃H₈ and the behavior compared with that of Cu and Co-beta and ZMS5 zeolites. The results show that Co and Cu-MCM22 samples are stable SCR catalysts. These zeolites give the maximum activity at 450°C. Their behavior towards oxygen content in the reactant phase and exchange level of the metal in the catalyst, is qualitatively similar to that of metal exchanged beta and ZSM5 zeolite, but the yields obtained with this zeolite are lower in any case. The infrared studies of adsorbed NO show, contrary to what is occurring in ZSM5 in which only Cu⁺ sites are observed at low NO partial pressure, that in this condition, Cu⁺ and Cu²⁺ species are formed on MCM22. The results indicate that in MCM22, the copper located in the 10 member ring (MR) circular channels behaves similarly to that present in ZSM5, while the Cu present in the 12 MR cavities has a strong tendency to agglomerate forming non active CuO clusters.     

Fe(phen)32+‐Modified Zeolite Particles and Their Energetic Studies

Chemically modified zeolite Y (NaY) particles and their resulting modified electrodes were prepared with acridinium (AcH+), iron(II) and 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) for energetic studies. According to diffuse reflectance absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry, AcH⁺ and Fe(phen)₃²⁺ were successfully entrapped in the zeolite particles. Transient emission spectra measurements showed that the life time of AcH+* in the zeolite particles (to 35 ns; λ_ex 365 nm; λ_em 500 nm) was greatly reduced upon incorporating Fe(phen)₃²⁺ and Fe²⁺. The fast de cay of AcH+*(NaY) suggested that a reductive quench was likely to take place in the zeolite particle. Probably due to a size‐exclusion effect, the bulky electron donor, N, N‐diethyl‐2‐methyl‐1,4‐phenylenediamine (DEPD), revealed a difficulty in reaching the photosensitizer, AcH⁺, in side the zeolite particle. As a consequence, the in significant photocurrent for the oxidation of DEPD was from the NaY|AcH⁺ electrode. However, if Fe²⁺ and Fe(phen)₃²⁺ were incorporated, the photocurrent would become more significant. Closer examinations, in addition, showed that the photooxidaton of DEPD occurred more rapidly on the NaY|AcH⁺|Fe(phen)₃²⁺ electrode, compared to the NaY|AcH⁺|Fe²⁺ electrode. This difference apparently results from a greater gap in energetics between DEPD and Fe(phen)₃³⁺_(NaY) than that between DEPD and Fe³⁺_(NaY). Due to this effect, a greater amount of indophenol blue, derived from the coupling reaction of the oxidized DEPD with 1‐naphthol, was formed and de posited on the NaY|AcH⁺|Fe(phen)₃²⁺modified electrode. Thanks to this photo‐induced charge‐transfer reaction, the NaY|AcH⁺|Fe(phen)₃²⁺ particle showed an application potential in image recording.