Bound constrained quadratic programming via piecewise quadratic functions

1 , the smallest eigenvalue of a symmetric, positive definite matrix, and is solved by Newton iteration with line search. The paper describes the algorithm and its implementation including estimation of λ₁, how to get a good starting point for the iteration, and up- and downdating of Cholesky factorization. Results of extensive testing and comparison with other methods for constrained QP are given. Received May 1, 1997 / Revised version received March 17, 1998 Published online November 24, 1998     

Basis- and partition identification for quadratic programming and linear complementarity problems

Optimal solutions of interior point algorithms for linear and quadratic programming and linear complementarity problems provide maximally complementary solutions. Maximally complementary solutions can be characterized by optimal partitions. On the other hand, the solutions provided by simplex–based pivot algorithms are given in terms of complementary bases. A basis identification algorithm is an algorithm which generates a complementary basis, starting from any complementary solution. A partition identification algorithm is an algorithm which generates a maximally complementary solution (and its corresponding partition), starting from any complementary solution. In linear programming such algorithms were respectively proposed by Megiddo in 1991 and Balinski and Tucker in 1969. In this paper we will present identification algorithms for quadratic programming and linear complementarity problems with sufficient matrices. The presented algorithms are based on the principal pivot transform and the orthogonality property of basis tableaus. Received April 9, 1996 / Revised version received April 27, 1998? Published online May 12, 1999     

Continuity properties of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker point set in quadratic programming problems

Received March 18, 1996 / Revised version received August 8, 1997 Published online November 24, 1998     

Intersection theorems on polytopes

Received June 6, 1995 / Revised version received May 26, 1998 Published online October 9, 1998     

Stability in the presence of degeneracy and error estimation

Received February 10, 1997 / Revised version received June 6, 1998 Published online October 9, 1998     

A note on “On Pareto optima, the Fermat-Weber problem, and polyhedral gauges”

Received September 3, 1997 / Revised version received March 20, 1998 Published online October 9, 1998     

A branch and cut algorithm for nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming

We present a branch and cut algorithm that yields in finite time, a globally ε-optimal solution (with respect to feasibility and optimality) of the nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming problem. The idea is to estimate all quadratic terms by successive linearizations within a branching tree using Reformulation-Linearization Techniques (RLT). To do so, four classes of linearizations (cuts), depending on one to three parameters, are detailed. For each class, we show how to select the best member with respect to a precise criterion. The cuts introduced at any node of the tree are valid in the whole tree, and not only within the subtree rooted at that node. In order to enhance the computational speed, the structure created at any node of the tree is flexible enough to be used at other nodes. Computational results are reported that include standard test problems taken from the literature. Some of these problems are solved for the first time with a proof of global optimality. Received December 19, 1997 / Revised version received July 26, 1999?Published online November 9, 1999     

Random Linkage: a family of acceptance/rejection algorithms for global optimisation

Received July 24, 1997 / Revised version received August 9, 1998 Published online January 20, 1999     

Discretization and localization in successive convex relaxation methods for nonconvex quadratic optimization

Based on the authors’ previous work which established theoretical foundations of two, conceptual, successive convex relaxation methods, i.e., the SSDP (Successive Semidefinite Programming) Relaxation Method and the SSILP (Successive Semi-Infinite Linear Programming) Relaxation Method, this paper proposes their implementable variants for general quadratic optimization problems. These problems have a linear objective function c ^T x to be maximized over a nonconvex compact feasible region F described by a finite number of quadratic inequalities. We introduce two new techniques, “discretization” and “localization,” into the SSDP and SSILP Relaxation Methods. The discretization technique makes it possible to approximate an infinite number of semi-infinite SDPs (or semi-infinite LPs) which appeared at each iteration of the original methods by a finite number of standard SDPs (or standard LPs) with a finite number of linear inequality constraints. We establish:?•Given any open convex set U containing F, there is an implementable discretization of the SSDP (or SSILP) Relaxation Method which generates a compact convex set C such that F⊆C⊆U in a finite number of iterations.?The localization technique is for the cases where we are only interested in upper bounds on the optimal objective value (for a fixed objective function vector c) but not in a global approximation of the convex hull of F. This technique allows us to generate a convex relaxation of F that is accurate only in certain directions in a neighborhood of the objective direction c. This cuts off redundant work to make the convex relaxation accurate in unnecessary directions. We establish:?•Given any positive number ε, there is an implementable localization-discretization of the SSDP (or SSILP) Relaxation Method which generates an upper bound of the objective value within ε of its maximum in a finite number of iterations. Received: June 30, 1998 / Accepted: May 18, 2000?Published online September 20, 2000     

An efficient algorithm for globally minimizing a quadratic function under convex quadratic constraints

In this paper we investigate two approaches to minimizing a quadratic form subject to the intersection of finitely many ellipsoids. The first approach is the d.c. (difference of convex functions) optimization algorithm (abbr. DCA) whose main tools are the proximal point algorithm and/or the projection subgradient method in convex minimization. The second is a branch-and-bound scheme using Lagrangian duality for bounding and ellipsoidal bisection in branching. The DCA was first introduced by Pham Dinh in 1986 for a general d.c. program and later developed by our various work is a local method but, from a good starting point, it provides often a global solution. This motivates us to combine the DCA and our branch and bound algorithm in order to obtain a good initial point for the DCA and to prove the globality of the DCA. In both approaches we attempt to use the ellipsoidal constrained quadratic programs as the main subproblems. The idea is based upon the fact that these programs can be efficiently solved by some available (polynomial and nonpolynomial time) algorithms, among them the DCA with restarting procedure recently proposed by Pham Dinh and Le Thi has been shown to be the most robust and fast for large-scale problems. Several numerical experiments with dimension up to 200 are given which show the effectiveness and the robustness of the DCA and the combined DCA-branch-and-bound algorithm. Received: April 22, 1999 / Accepted: November 30, 1999?Published online February 23, 2000     

Using continuous nonlinear relaxations to solve. constrained maximum-entropy sampling problems

Received January 9, 1997 / Revised version received January 26, 1998 Published online November 24, 1998     

Testing optimality for quadratic 0-1 problems

Received June 4, 1996 / Revised version received November 19, 1997 Published online November 24, 1998     

Composition duality and maximal monotonicity

* TL, where T is maximal monotone and L is linear and continuous with adjoint L^*. Received September 9, 1997 / Revised version received June 30, 1998 Published online January 20, 1999     

Asymptotic constraint qualifications and global error bounds for convex inequalities

Received October 26, 1996 / Revised version received October 1, 1997 Published online October 9, 1998     

Nonsmooth analysis of eigenvalues

Received October 28, 1996 / Revised version received January 28, 1998 Published online October 9, 1998     

A new bound for the quadratic assignment problem based on convex quadratic programming

We describe a new convex quadratic programming bound for the quadratic assignment problem (QAP). The construction of the bound uses a semidefinite programming representation of a basic eigenvalue bound for QAP. The new bound dominates the well-known projected eigenvalue bound, and appears to be competitive with existing bounds in the trade-off between bound quality and computational effort. Received: February 2000 / Accepted: November 2000?Published online January 17, 2001     

Infeasible-start primal-dual methods and infeasibility detectors for nonlinear programming problems

ln) iterations, where ν is the parameter of a self-concordant barrier for the cone, ε is a relative accuracy and ρ_f is a feasibility measure. We also discuss the behavior of path-following methods as applied to infeasible problems. We prove that strict infeasibility (primal or dual) can be detected in O(ln) iterations, where ρ_· is a primal or dual infeasibility measure. Received April 25, 1996 / Revised version received March 4, 1998 Published online October 9, 1998     

Legendre-type optimality conditions for a variational problem with inequality state constraints

, they differ from the Legendre-Clebsch condition. They give information about the Hesse matrix of the integrand at not only inactive points but also active points. On the other hand, since the inequality state constraints can be regarded as an infinite number of inequality constraints, they sometimes form an envelope. According to a general theory [9], one has to take the envelope into consideration when one consider second-order necessary optimality conditions for an abstract optimization problem with a generalized inequality constraint. However, we show that we do not need to take it into account when we consider Legendre-type conditions. Finally, we show that any inequality state constraint forms envelopes except two trivial cases. We prove it by presenting an envelope in a visible form. Received April 18, 1995 / Revised version received January 5, 1998 Published online August 18, 1998     

On the rate of convergence of sequential quadratic programming with nondifferentiable exact penalty function in the presence of constraint degeneracy

We analyze the convergence of a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method for nonlinear programming for the case in which the Jacobian of the active constraints is rank deficient at the solution and/or strict complementarity does not hold for some or any feasible Lagrange multipliers. We use a nondifferentiable exact penalty function, and we prove that the sequence generated by an SQP using a line search is locally R-linearly convergent if the matrix of the quadratic program is positive definite and constant over iterations, provided that the Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification and some second-order sufficiency conditions hold. Received: April 28, 1998 / Accepted: June 28, 2001?Published online April 12, 2002     

Superlinear and quadratic convergence of affine-scaling interior-point Newton methods for problems with simple bounds without strict complementarity assumption

A class of affine-scaling interior-point methods for bound constrained optimization problems is introduced which are locally q–superlinear or q–quadratic convergent. It is assumed that the strong second order sufficient optimality conditions at the solution are satisfied, but strict complementarity is not required. The methods are modifications of the affine-scaling interior-point Newton methods introduced by T. F. Coleman and Y. Li (Math. Programming, 67, 189–224, 1994). There are two modifications. One is a modification of the scaling matrix, the other one is the use of a projection of the step to maintain strict feasibility rather than a simple scaling of the step. A comprehensive local convergence analysis is given. A simple example is presented to illustrate the pitfalls of the original approach by Coleman and Li in the degenerate case and to demonstrate the performance of the fast converging modifications developed in this paper. Received October 2, 1998 / Revised version received April 7, 1999?Published online July 19, 1999