Solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry for the analysis of haloacetic acids in water

Headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was studied as a possible alternative to liquid-liquid extraction for the analysis of haloacetic acids (HAAs) in water. The method involves derivatization of the acids to their ethyl esters using sulphuric acid and ethanol after evaporation, followed by headspace SPME with a polydimethylsiloxane fibre and gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry (GC-IT-MS). The derivatization procedure was optimized: maximum sensitivity was obtained with esterification for 10 min at 50 degrees C in 30 microl of sulphuric acid and 40 microl of ethanol. The headspace SPME conditions were also optimized and good sensitivity was obtained at a sampling temperature of 25 degrees C, an absorption time of 10 min, the addition of 0.1 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate and a desorption time of 2 min. Good precision (RSD lower than 10%) and detection limits in the ng l(-1) range (from 10 to 200 ng l(-1)) were obtained for all the compounds. The optimized procedure was applied to the analysis of HAAs in tap water and the results obtained by standard addition agreed with those of EPA method 552.2, whereas discrepancies due to matrix interferences were observed using external calibration. Consequently, headspace SPME-GC-IT-MS with standard addition is recommended for the analysis of these compounds in drinking water.     

Development of dry derivatization and headspace solid-phase microextraction technique for the GC-ECD determination of haloacetic acids in tap water

A simple, fast and efficient liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) technique using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), in conjunction with gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) has been developed for the determination of haloacetic acids (HAAs) in tap water. The analytical procedure involves LLE, evaporation of extraction solvent to dryness, derivatization of HAAs into their methyl esters with acidic methanol, HS-SPME using 100-μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber, and GC-ECD determination. The derivatization process was optimized in dry conditions to achieve maximum sensitivity using the following conditions: esterification for 10 min at 55°C in 50 μL methanol, 30 μL sulphuric acid and 0.1 g anhydrous sodium sulphate. The HS-SPME conditions were also optimized and good sensitivity was obtained at a sampling temperature of 25°C, an absorption time of 10 min and a desorption time of 2 min. The linear calibration curves were observed for the concentration ranging from 0.1 to 200 μg/L with the correlation coefficients (R ²) greater than 0.993 and the relative standard deviation (RSD) less than 12%. The method detection limits of all analytes ranging from 0.02 to 0.7 μg/L were obtained. The proposed method is compared directly to standard EPA method 552.2 in drinking water, and significant advantage in terms of selectivity was observed. Finally the optimized procedure was applied to the analysis of HAAs in Bizerte drinking water. The studied HAA were detected in all the water samples and the concentration of total HAA5 ranged from 17.8 to 70.3 μg/L.     

Automated headspace solid-phase microextraction and in-matrix derivatization for the determination of amphetamine-related drugs in human urine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

An automated extraction and determination method for the gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of amphetamine-related drugs in human urine is developed using headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and in-matrix derivatization. A urine sample (0.5 mL, potassium carbonate (5 M, 1.0 mL), sodium chloride (0.5 g), and ethylchloroformate (20 microL) are put in a sample vial. Amphetamine-related drugs are converted to ethylformate derivatives (carbamates) in the vial because amphetamine-related drugs in urine are quickly reacted with ethylchloroformate. An SPME fiber is then exposed at 80 degrees C for 15 min in the headspace of the vial. The extracted derivatives to the fiber are desorbed by exposing the fiber in the injection port of a GC-MS. The calibration curves show linearity in the range of 1.0 to 1000 ng/mL for methamphetamine, fenfluramine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine; 2.0 to 1000 ng/mL for amphetamine and phentermine; 5.0 to 1000 ng/mL for methylenedioxyamphetamine; 10 to 1000 ng/mL for phenethylamine; and 50 to 1000 ng/mL for 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine in urine. No interferences are found, and the time for analysis is 30 min for one sample. Furthermore, this proposed method is applied to some clinical and medico-legal cases by taking methamphetamine. Methamphetamine and its metabolite amphetamine are detected in the urine samples collected from the patients involved in the clinical cases. Methamphetamine, amphetamine, and phenethylamine are detected in the urine sample collected from the victim of a medico-legal case.     

Determination of methylmalonic acid and glutaric acid in urine by aqueous-phase derivatization followed by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

In this work, a novel technique of aqueous-phase derivatization followed by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was developed for the determination of organic acids in urine. The analytical procedure involves derivatization of organic acids to their ethyl esters with diethyl sulfate, headspace sampling, and GC/MS analysis. The proposed method was applied to the determination of methylmalonic acid and glutaric acid in urine. The experimental parameters and method validation were studied. Optimal conditions were obtained: PDMS fiber, extraction temperature 55 degrees C, extraction time 30 min, and 60 microL of diethyl sulfate as derivatization reagent with 2 mg of the ion pairing agent tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate. The method was linear over three orders of magnitude, and detection limits were 21 nM for methylmalonic acid and 34 nM for glutaric acid, respectively. Consequently, in-situ derivatization/HS-SPME/GC/MS is an alternative and powerful method for determination of organic acids as biomarkers in biological fluids.     

Determination of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) in plasma and urine by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/positive ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry

A new method for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) in plasma and urine samples is described. It involves the conversion of GHB to gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), its subsequent headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME), and detection by gas chromatography/positive ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry (GC/PICI-MS), using D(6)-GBL as internal standard. The assay is linear over a plasma GHB range of 1-100 microg/mL (n = 5, r = 0.999) and a urine GHB range of 5-150 microg/mL (n = 5, r = 0. 998). Relative intra- and inter-assay standard deviations, determined for plasma and urine samples at 5 and 50 microg/mL, are all below 5%. The method is simple, specific and reasonably fast. It may be applied for clinical and forensic toxicology as well as for purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring.     

固相萃取-离子色谱法测定饮用水中的痕量卤代乙酸

建立了固相萃取-离子色谱(SPE-IC)测定饮用水中痕量卤代乙酸(HAAs)(包括一氯乙酸、二氯乙酸、三氯乙酸、一溴乙酸和二溴乙酸)的方法。固相萃取采用LiChrolut EN SPE柱来进行痕量待测物的预浓缩（25倍）和基体杂质的消除,用NaOH(10 mmol/L)洗脱;色谱分离采用亲水性、高容量、氢氧化物选择型阴离子交换柱Dionex IonPac AS16(250 mm×4 mm i.d.),以NaOH为流动相进行浓度梯度淋洗,淋洗速度为0.8 mL/min,电导检测,进样量为500 μL。结果表明,用SPE-IC法测定HAAs,一溴乙酸的检测限为12.5 μg/L,其余4种HAAs的检测限为0.38~1.69　μg/L。该法可实现对饮用水中痕量卤代乙酸的测定。     

Determination of chlorophenols in water samples using simultaneous dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and derivatization followed by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection

Simultaneous dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and derivatization combined with gas chromatography-electron-capture detection (GC-ECD) was used to determine chlorophenols (CPs) in water sample. In this derivatization/extraction method, 500 microL acetone (disperser solvent) containing 10.0 microL chlorobenzene (extraction solvent) and 50 microL acetic anhydride (derivatization reagent) was rapidly injected by syringe in 5.00 mL aqueous sample containing CPs (analytes) and K(2)CO(3) (0.5%, w/v). Within a few seconds the analytes derivatized and extracted at the same time. After centrifugation, 0.50 microL of sedimented phase containing enriched analytes was determined by GC-ECD. Some effective parameters on derivatization and extraction, such as extraction and disperser solvent type and their volume, amount of derivatization reagent, derivatization and extraction time, salt addition and amount of K(2)CO(3) were studied and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, enrichment factors and recoveries are in the range of 287-906 and 28.7-90.6%, respectively. The calibration graphs are linear in the range of 0.02-400 microg L(-1) and limit of detections (LODs) are in the range of 0.010-2.0 microg L(-1). The relative standard deviations (RSDs, for 200 microg L(-1) of MCPs, 100 microg L(-1) of DCPs, 4.00 microg L(-1) of TCPs, 2.00 microg L(-1) of TeCPs and PCP in water) with and without using internal standard are in the range of 0.6-4.7% (n=7) and 1.7-7.1% (n=7), respectively. The relative recoveries of well, tap and river water samples which have been spiked with different levels of CPs are 91.6-104.7, 80.8-117.9 and 83.3-101.3%, respectively. The obtained results show that simultaneous DLLME and derivatization combined with GC-ECD is a fast simple method for the determination of CPs in water samples.     

固相萃取-衍生化-气相色谱法测定血液中的3种苯氧羧酸类除草剂

建立了一种血液中2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D)、2-(2,4-二氯苯氧)-丙酸(2,4-DP)和4-氯-2-甲基-苯氧乙酸(MCPA)3种苯氧羧酸类除草剂的分析方法.血样用0.1 mol/L盐酸稀释后用GDX401大孔树脂吸附、用乙醚洗脱,萃取物用二氯丙醇在硫酸催化下进行酯化衍生,衍生物经气相色谱-电子捕获检测.2,4-D、2,4-DP和MCPA的检测限分别为20,8和40 ng/mL.定量分析用2,4-二氯苯乙酸作内标,线性关系和回收率结果均令人满意.     

Optimisation and comparison of several microextraction/methylation methods for determining haloacetic acids in water using gas chromatography

This article presents the different modes and configurations of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) through comparison with headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) for the simultaneous extraction/methylation of the nine haloacetic acids (HAAs) found in water. This is the first analytical case reported of solvent bar extraction–preconcentration–derivatisation assisted by an ion-pairing transfer for HAAs. In this method, 5 μL of the organic extractant, decane, was confined within a hollow-fibre membrane that was placed in a stirred aqueous sample containing the derivatising reagents (dimethylsulphate with a tetrabutylammonium salt). With heating at 45 °C in the HS-SPME method, some organic solvents (extractant, excess of derivatising reagent) are also volatilised and compete with the esters on the fibre (the fibre is damaged and it can be reused only 50−60 times). In addition, the HS-SPME method provides inadequate sensitivity (limits of detections between 0.3 and 5 μg/L) to quantify HAAs at the level usually found in drinking waters. Alternative headspace LPME methods for HAAs require heating (45 °C, 25 min) to derivatise and volatilise the esters but, by using solvent bar microextraction (SBME), the extraction/methylation takes place at room temperature without degradation of HAAs to trihalomethanes. Adequate precision (relative standard deviation of approximately 8%), linearity (0.1–500 μg/L) and sensitivity (10 times higher than the HS-SPME alternative) indicate that the SBME method can be a candidate for routine determination of HAAs in tap water. Finally, the SBME method was applied for the analysis of HAAs in tap and swimming pool water and the results were compared with those of a previous validated headspace gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method.      

Determination of triazine herbicides in aqueous samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry

A simple and rapid new dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction technique (DLLME) coupled with gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometric detection (GC-MS) was developed for the extraction and analysis of triazine herbicides from water samples. In this method, a mixture of 12.0 microL chlorobenzene (extraction solvent) and 1.00 mL acetone (disperser solvent) is rapidly injected by syringe into the 5.00 mL water sample containing 4% (w/v) sodium chloride. In this process, triazines in the water sample are extracted into the fine droplets of chlorobenzene. After centrifuging for 5 min at 6000 rpm, the fine droplets of chlorobenzene are sedimented in the bottom of the conical test tube (8.0+/-0.3 microL). The settled phase (2.0 microL) is collected and injected into the GC-MS for separation and determination of triazines. Some important parameters, viz, type of extraction solvent, identity and volume of disperser solvent, extraction time, and salt effect, which affect on DLLME were studied. Under optimum conditions the enrichment factors and extraction recoveries were high and ranged between 151-722 and 24.2-115.6%, respectively. The linear range was wide (0.2-200 microg L(-1)) and the limits of detection were between 0.021 and 0.12 microg L(-1) for most of the analytes. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for 5.00 microg L(-1) of triazines in water were in the range of 1.36-8.67%. The performance of the method was checked by analysis of river and tap water samples, and the relative recoveries of triazines from river and tap water at a spiking level of 5.0 microg L(-1) were 85.2-114.5% and 87.8-119.4%, respectively. This method was also compared with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and hollow fiber protected liquid-phase microextraction (HFP-LPME) methods. DLLME is a very simple and rapid method, requiring less than 3 min. It also has high enrichment factors and recoveries for the extraction of triazines from water.     

Poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolith in-tube solid-phase microextraction applied to simultaneous analysis of some amphetamine derivatives in urine by capillary zone electrophoresis

A method based on in-tube solid-phase microextraction and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) was proposed for simultaneously determining four amphetamines (amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) in urine. A poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolithic capillary column, which can provide sufficient extraction efficiency, was introduced for the extraction of amphetamines from urine samples. The hydrophobic main chains and acidic pendant groups of the monolithic column make it a superior material for extraction of basic analytes from aqueous matrix. After extraction, the samples were analyzed by CZE. The best separation was achieved using a buffer composed of 0.1 M disodium hydrogen phosphate (adjusted to pH 4.5 with 1 M hydrochloric acid) and 20% methanol v/v, with a temperature and voltage of 25 degrees C and 20 kV, respectively. By applying electrokinetic injection with field-amplified sample stacking, detection limits of 25-34 microg/L were achieved. Excellent method of reproducibility was found over a linear range of 0.1-5 mg/L. Determination of these analytes from abusers' urine sample was also demonstrated.     

气相色谱-质谱法测定饮用水中的卤乙酸

参照美国EPA Method 552.3方法中的液-液微萃取、酸化甲醇衍生化技术,以高纯水代替甲基叔丁基醚（MTBE）做溶剂配制标准贮备液,采用气相色谱/质谱联用技术对饮用水中的卤乙酸(HAAs)进行测定。结果表明:在所确立的检测条件下,样品分析时间短,内标、HAAs组分峰在谱图上能够得到很好的分离。低、中、高3个浓度水平的加标水样的HAAs回收率为82%~103%。该方法的检测限:二氯乙酸为0.72 μg/L、三氯乙酸为0.44 μg/L。用水做溶剂配制的标准贮备液在4 ℃条件下贮存时,贮存时间为2个月。     

Headspace single-drop microextraction with in-drop derivatization and capillary electrophoretic determination for free cyanide analysis

A new method involving headspace single-drop microextraction (SDME) with in-drop derivatization and CE is developed for the preconcentration and determination of free cyanide. An aqueous microdrop (5 microL) containing Ni(II)-NH(3) (as derivatization agent), sodium carbonate and ammonium pyromellitate (as internal standard) was used as the acceptor phase. The extracted cyanide forms a stable Ni(CN)(4) (2-) complex which is then determined by CE. Common experimental parameters (sample and acceptor phase pH, extraction temperature, extraction time and sample ionic strength) affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated. Using headspace SDME, free cyanide can be effectively extracted from the neutral solutions, i.e. without the acidification of the sample which often is prone to errors due to incomplete liberation and artefactual cyanide production. Proposed SDME-CE method provided about 58-fold enrichment in 20 min. The calibration curve was linear for concentrations of CN(-) in the range from 0.25 to 20 micromol/L (R(2) = 0.997). The LOD (S/N = 3) was estimated to be 0.08 micromol/L of CN(-). Such a detection sensitivity is high enough for free cyanide determination in common environmental and physiological samples. Finally, headspace SDME was applied to determine free cyanide in human saliva and urine samples with spiked recoveries in the range of 91.7-105.6%. The main advantage of this method is that sample clean-up, preconcentration and derivatization procedures can be completed in a single step. In addition, the proposed technique does not require any sample pretreatment and thus is much less susceptible to interferences compared to existing methods.     

Evaluation of solid-phase microextraction methods for determination of trace concentration aldehydes in aqueous solution

A method for trace analysis of a wide range of aldehydes (saturated/unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic aldehydes, including hydroxylated species, and dialdehydes) in an aqueous solution was optimized. An evaluation of three solid-phase microextraction (SPME) techniques (headspace, liquid-phase, and on-fiber derivatization) with o-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride (PFBHA) aldehyde derivatization was performed focusing on the optimization of the main extraction parameters (temperature and time). The optimized method employed the liquid-phase SPME (D-L-SPME) of derivatized aldehydes at 80 degrees C for 30 min. Limits of detection (LODs) using this optimal method were in the range of 0.1-4.4 microg/L for the majority of aliphatic (saturated, unsaturated), aromatic aldehydes and dialdehydes. Formaldehyde LODs and those of some hydroxylated aromatic aldehydes were between 32 and 55 microg/L. Headspace SPME using an on-fiber derivatization generally showed a lower sensitivity and several compounds were not detected. Another technique, the optimized headspace SPME of aldehydes derivatized in aqueous solution, was not as sensitive as D-L-SPME for hydroxylated aromatic aldehydes. The developed method was used to analyze aqueous particulate matter extracts; this method achieved higher sensitivities than those obtained with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 556.     

自制离子液体固相微萃取涂层分析人体尿液中的五氯酚

建立了顶空固相微萃取与气相色谱法（HS-SPME-GC）测定人体尿液中五氯酚（PCP）的新方法。 采用溶胶-凝胶法,加入自制的离子液体键合固相微萃取涂层,优化了萃取温度、萃取时间、pH值、离子强度及解吸时间。 结果表明,样品中加入3 g NaCl,溶液的pH值为2,并以一定速度搅拌的条件下,在80 ℃顶空萃取50 min,300 ℃下解吸5 min,方法的检测限为5.0 ng/L,线性范围为0.05～100 μg/L,相对标准偏差(RSD)为5.9%,加标回收率为106.6%。     

Development of water-phase derivatization followed by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for fast determination of valproic acid in human plasma

In this study, a simple, rapid, and sensitive method was developed and validated for the quantification of valproic acid (VPA), an antiepileptic drug, in human plasma, which was based on water-phase derivatization followed by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). In the proposed method, VPA in plasma was rapidly derivatized with a mixture of isobutyl chloroformate, ethanol and pyridine under mild conditions (room temperature, aqueous medium), and the VPA ethyl ester formed was headspace-extracted and simultaneously concentrated using the SPME technique. Finally, the analyte extracted on SPME fiber was analyzed by GC/MS. The experimental parameters and method validations were studied. The optimal conditions were obtained: PDMS fiber, stirring rate of 1100 rpm, sample temperature of 80 degrees C, extraction time of 20 min, NaCl concentration of 30%. The proposed method had a limit of quantification (0.3 microg/mL), good recovery (89-97%) and precision (RSD value less than 10%). Because the proposed method combined a rapid water-phase derivatization with a fast, simple and solvent-free sample extraction and concentration technique of SPME, the sample preparation time was less than 25 min. This much shortens the whole analysis time of VPA in plasma. The validated method has been successfully used to analyze VPA in human plasma samples for application in pharmacokinetic studies. All these results show that water-phase derivatization followed by HS-SPME and GC/MS is an alternative and powerful method for fast determination of VPA in biological fluids.     

Simultaneous determination of caffeine, theobromine, and theophylline by high-performance liquid chromatography

This work relates the development of an analytical methodology to simultaneously determine three methylxanthines (caffeine, theobromine, and theophylline) in beverages and urine samples based on reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Separation is made with a Bondesil C18 column using methanol-water-acetic acid or ethanol-water-acetic acid (20:75:5, v/v/v) as the mobile phase at 0.7 mL/min. Identification is made by absorbance detection at 273 nm. Under optimized conditions, the detection limit of the HPLC method is 0.1 pg/mL for all three methylxanthines. This method is applied to urine and to 25 different beverage samples, which included coffee, tea, chocolate, and coconut water. The concentration ranges determined in the beverages and urine are: < 0.1 pg/mL to 350 microg/mL and 3.21 microg/mL to 71.2 microg/mL for caffeine; < 0.1 pg/mL to 32 microg mL and < 0.1 pg/mL to 13.2 microg/mL for theobromine; < 0.1 pg/mL to 47 microg/mL and < 0.1 pg/mL to 66.3 microg/mL for theophylline. The method proposed in this study is rapid and suitable for the simultaneous quantitation of methylxanthines in beverages and human urine samples and requires no extraction step or derivatization.     

Determination of chlorophenols in soil samples by microwave-assisted extraction coupled to headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-electron-capture detection

Microwave-assisted extraction coupled to headspace solid-phase microextraction was studied and applied for one-step in-situ sample preparation prior to analysis of chlorophenols (CPs) in soil samples. The CPs in soil sample were extracted into the aqueous solution and then directly onto the solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber in headspace under the aid of microwave irradiation. After being desorbed from SPME fiber in the GC injection port, CPs were analyzed with a GC-electron-capture detection system. Parameters affecting the extraction efficiency such as the extraction solutions, the pH in the slurry, the humic acid content in the soil, the power and the irradiation time of microwave as well as the desorption parameters were investigated. Experimental results indicated that the extraction of a 1.0 g soil sample with a 6-ml aqueous solution (pH 2) and a polyacrylate fiber under the medium-power irradiation (132 W) for 9 min achieved the best extraction efficiency of about 90% recovery and less than 10% RSD. Desorption was optimal at 300 degrees C for 3 min. Detection limits were obtained at around 0.1-2.0 microg/kg levels. The proposed method provided a simple, fast, and organic solvent-free procedure to analyze CPs from soil sample matrix.     

Single-drop microextraction with in-microvial derivatization for the determination of haloacetic acids in water sample by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

A new approach using single-drop microextraction (SDME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of six haloacetic acids (HAAs) in water samples was presented. n-Octanol was used as extractant and derivatization reagent. HAAs were derivatized both simultaneously during the extraction in the solvent microdrop, and after extraction, inside a glass microvial (1.1 mm I.D.). Trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) was used as the reaction catalyst. The influence of catalyst amount, derivatization time and temperature on the yield of the in-microvial derivatization was investigated. Derivatization reaction was performed using 1.2 μL of TFAA at 100 °C for 20 min. Extraction was performed using 1.8 μL of n-octanol containing TFAA (10%, v/v). Experimental parameters, such as, exposure time, sample pH and extraction temperature were controlled and optimized. Analytical parameters such as linearity, precision and limit of detection were also evaluated. The proposed method was proved to be a suitable analytical procedure for HAAs in water with limits of detection 0.1–1.2 μg/L. The relative recoveries range from 82.5 to 97.6% for all the target analytes. Precision values were from 5.1 to 8.5% (as intra-day relative standard deviation, RSD) and 8.8–12.3% (as inter-day RSD).     

Headspace single-drop microextraction for the analysis of chlorobenzenes in water samples

Exposing a microlitre organic solvent drop to the headspace of an aqueous sample contaminated with ten chlorobenzene compounds proved to be an excellent preconcentration method for headspace analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The proposed headspace single-drop microextraction (SDME) method was initially optimised and the optimum experimental conditions found were: 2.5 microl toluene microdrop exposed for 5 min to the headspace of a 10 ml aqueous sample containing 30% (w/v) NaCl placed in 15 ml vial and stirred at 1000 rpm. The calculated calibration curves gave a high level of linearity for all target analytes with correlation coefficients ranging between 0.9901 and 0.9971, except for hexachlorobenzene where the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9886. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation varied between 2.1 and 13.2% (n = 5). The limits of detection ranged between 0.003 and 0.031 microg/l using GC-MS with selective ion monitoring. Analysis of spiked tap and well water samples revealed that matrix had little effect on extraction. A comparative study was performed between the proposed method, headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME), solid-phase extraction (SPE) and EPA method 8121. Overall, headspace SDME proved to be a rapid, simple and sensitive technique for the analysis of chlorobenzenes in water samples, representing an excellent alternative to traditional and other, recently introduced, methods.