Synthesis and Characterization of Alkyltris(2-pyridyl)phosphonium Salts

Alkytris(2-pyridyl)phosphonium salts [(2-Py) ₃ PR]X 1 [1a, R = Et, X = Br; 1b, R = Pr, X = Br; 1c, R = Bu, X = Br; 1d, R = CH₂Ph, X = Br; 1e, R = CH ₂ Ph, X = Cl] were synthesised from (2-Py) ₃ P and an excess of RCl. 1c and 1e were found to rapidly decompose in hot acetone to 2,2′-bipyridinium(+1) bromide 2 and (2-Py)P(O)(CH ₂ Ph)C(OH)Me ₂ 3, respectively. A reaction mechanism for both products is proposed. All compounds were fully characterized, including X-ray crystallography for 1a and 3 with 1a being the first representative of this class of compounds characterized by this technique.     

New Look into the Synthesis of Polyhalogenoarylphosphanes

The present study shows new aspects of the synthesis of polyhalogenoarylphosphanes. The sterically hindered anions Ph(R)P-Y^? (1a–c, Y = O, lone pair; R = Ph, Bu^t) have been used to show the complexity of the reaction between phosphorus nucleophiles and hexahalogenobenzenes or 9-bromofluorene (E3). The Ph(Bu^t)P-O^? (1a) anion reacts with hexachlorobenzene (E1), hexafluorobenzene (E2), or E3 to give Ph(R)P(O)X (4a–c, X = F, Cl, Br) with the release of the corresponding carbanion as a nucleofuge, followed by side reactions. In contrast, the lithium phosphides Ph(R)PLi (1b,c) react with hexahalogenobenzenes to give the corresponding diphosphanes 5a,b as the main product and traces of P-arylated products, i.e., Ph(R)P-C₆X₅ (10a,b, X = Cl, F). Unexpectedly, Ph(Bu^t)PLi (1b) reacts with an excess of 9-bromofluorene to give only halogenophosphane Ph(Bu^t)P-X.     

Efficient dehydration of primary amides to nitriles catalyzed by phosphorus-chalcogen chelated iron hydrides

A series of phosphorus-chalcogen chelated hydrido iron (II) complexes 1–7 , (o-(R'₂P)-p-R-C₆H₄Y)FeH (PMe₃)₃ ( 1 : R = H, R' = Ph, Y = O; 2 : R = Me, R' = Ph, Y = O; 3 : R = H, R' = ⁱPr, Y = O; 4 : R = Me, R' = ⁱPr, Y = O; 5 : R = H, R' = Ph, Y = S; 6 : R = Me, R' = Ph, Y = S; 7 : R = H, R' = Ph, Y = Se), were synthesized. The catalytic performances of 1–7 for dehydration of amides to nitriles were explored by comparing three factors: (1) different chalcogen coordination atoms Y; (2) R' group of the phosphine moiety; (3) R substituent group at the phenyl ring. It is confirmed that 5 with S as coordination atom has the best catalytic activity and 7 with Se as coordination atom has the poorest catalytic activity among complexes 1 , 5 and 7 . Electron-rich complex 4 is the best catalyst among the seven complexes and the dehydration reaction was completed by using 2 mol% catalyst loading at 60 °C with 24 hr in the presence of (EtO)₃SiH in THF. Catalyst 4 has good tolerance to many functional groups. Among the seven iron complexes, new complexes 3 and 4 were obtained via the O-H bond activation of the preligands o-ⁱPr₂P(C₆H₄)OH and o-ⁱPr₂P-p-Me-(C₆H₄)OH by Fe(PMe₃)₄. Both 3 and 4 were characterized by spectroscopic methods and X-ray diffraction analysis. The catalytic mechanism was experimentally studied and also proposed.     

Reaktion von (R,R)‐(N,N′)‐Diisopropylcyclohexyl‐1,2‐diamin mit Me2MCl (M = Ga,In)

Reaction of (R,R)‐(N,N′)‐Diisopropylcyclohexyl‐1,2‐diamine with Me₂MCl (M = Ga, In) (R,R)‐(N,N′)‐Diisopropylcyclohexyl‐1,2‐diamine (H₂L) was reacted with Me₂GaCl and Me₂InCl in boiling toluene, respectively. In both cases the salt [Me₂M(H₂L)][Me₂MCl₂] [M = Ga ( 1 ), In ( 2 )] was formed. 1 and 2 were characterized by NMR and vibrational spectroscopy. In addition, an X‐ray structure determination was applied on 2 . According to the spectroscopical and structural findings 1 and 2 consist of cations [Me₂M(H₂L)]⁺ and anions [Me₂MCl₂]^?.     

Alkoxy,amido and thiolato complexes of tris (3, 5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borato(nitrosyl) molybdenum fluoride,chloride and bromide

The complexes Mo{HB(Me₂pyz)₃}(NO)XY {HB(Me₂pyz)₃  HB(3, 5-Me₂C₃HN₂)₃; X=Y=F, Cl or Br; X=F, Y=OEt, NHMe or SBuⁿ; X=Cl, Y=NHR (R=Me Et, Buⁿ, Ph, p-MeC₆H₄), NMe₂ and SR (R=Buⁿ, C₆H₁₁, CH₂Ph, Ph); X=Br, Y=NHMe, NMe₂ and SBuⁿ} have been prepared and characterised spectroscopically. Their properties are generally similar to those of their iodo-analogues.     

Platinum(II) Mixed Ligand Complexes with Thiourea Derivatives,Dimethyl Sulphoxide and Chloride: Syntheses,Molecular Structures,and ESCA Data

The platinum(II) mixed ligand complexes [PtCl(L^1‐6)(dmso)] with six differently substituted thiourea derivatives HL, R₂NC(S)NHC(O)R′ (R = Et, R′ = p‐O₂N‐Ph: HL¹; R = Ph, R′ = p‐O₂N‐Ph: HL²; R = R′ = Ph: HL³; R = Et, R′ = o‐Cl‐Ph: HL⁴; R₂N = EtOC(O)N(CH₂CH₂)₂N, R′ = Ph: HL⁵) and Et₂NC(S)N=CNH‐1‐Naph (HL⁶), as well as the bis(benzoylthioureato‐κO, κS)‐platinum(II) complexes [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂] have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, FAB(+)‐MS, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, as well as X‐ray structure analysis ([PtCl(L¹)(dmso)] and [PtCl(L^{3, 4})(dmso)]) and ESCA ([PtCl(L^{1, 2})(dmso)] and [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂]). The mixed ligand complexes [PtCl(L)(dmso)] have a nearly square‐planar coordination at the platinum atoms. After deprotonation, the thiourea derivatives coordinate bidentately via O and S, DMSO bonds monodentately to the Pt^II atom via S atom in a cis arrangement with respect to the thiocarbonyl sulphur atom. The Pt—S‐bonds to the DMSO are significant shorter than those to the thiocarbonyl‐S atom. In comparison with the unsubstituted case, electron withdrawing substituents at the phenyl group of the benzoyl moiety of the thioureate (p‐NO₂, o‐Cl) cause a significant elongation of the Pt—S(dmso)‐bond trans arranged to the benzoyl‐O—Pt‐bond. The ESCA data confirm the found coordination and bonding conditions. The Pt 4f_7/2 electron binding energies of the complexes [PtCl(L^{1, 2})(dmso)] are higher than those of the bis(benzoylthioureato)‐complexes [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂]. This may indicate a withdrawal of electron density from platinum(II) caused by the DMSO ligands.     

Preparation of Dimethyl and Chloro/Methyl Complexes of Platinum(II) Supported by α‐Diimine Ligands: Trends in the Ease of Oxidation to Platinum(IV)

α‐Diimine ligands react with the platinum(II) alkyl complexes [(Me₂S)PtMe₂]₂ and (Me₂S)₂PtClMe to form (RDAB^R′)PtMe₂ and (RDAB^R′)PtClMe (RDAB^R′=RN=CR′−CR′=NR; R=2,6‐Me₂Ph, 2,6‐(CHMe₂)₂Ph, 3,5‐Me₂Ph, 3,5‐(CF₃)₂Ph, C₆H₁₁; R′=Me, H). The oxidation of these complexes with Cl₂, I₂, N‐chlorosuccinimide, [PtCl₆]²⁻ and (TMEDA)PtMe₂I₂ has been investigated. Attempts to determine the oxidation potentials of the Pt^II complexes electrochemically yielded only irreversible one‐electron oxidations. However, a qualitative ordering of increasing difficulty of oxidation has been determined for the series (RDAB^R′)PtMe₂<(RDAB^R′)PtClMe<(RDAB^R′)PtCl₂≪(RDAB^R′)PtMe(solvent)]⁺. The oxidation proceeds via a two‐electron inner‐sphere electron transfer from a bridged binuclear intermediate. The oxidation of (RDAB^R′)PtMe₂ by (TMEDA)PtMe₂I₂ exhibits characteristic third‐order kinetics, first‐order each in [Pt^II], [Pt^IV] and [I⁻]. Oxidation by a one‐electron process in MeCN solution results in a rapid subsequent disproportionation to Pt^IIMe and Pt^IVMe₃ cations with MeCN occupying the fourth or sixth coordination sites. Single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations for [(2,6‐Me₂PhDAB^Me)PtMe₃(MeCN)]⁺[PtCl₆]_0.5(MeCN) and [(CyDAB^H)PtMe₃(MeCN)]⁺[PtCl₆]_0.5(MeCN) are reported.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Intramolecularly Stabilized Chiral Dimethylindium Alkoxides and their Use as Cross Coupling Reagents

The enantiomerically pure dimeric N, O‐5‐chelates [Me₂In(μ‐OCH₂CH(R)NMe₂)]₂ {R = Me (S) ( 2 ); R = ⁱPr (S) ( 3 ); R = ⁱBu (S) ( 4 ); R = Bz (S) ( 5 )}, and [Me₂In‐{μ‐(1R, 2S)‐OCH(Ph)CH(Me)NMe₂}]₂ ( 6 ), as well as the achiral dimeric N, O‐6‐chelate [Me₂In(μ‐O(CH₂)₃NMe₂)]₂ ( 7 ) have been synthesized from trimethylindium and equimolar amounts of the corresponding enantiomerically pure dimethylamino alcohols or of the achiral dimethylaminopropanol by elimination of methane. Their ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and mass spectra as well as the X‐ray single crystal structure analyses of [Me₂In{μ‐O(CH₂)₂NMe₂}]₂ ( 1 ), 3, 5, 6 and 7 are described and discussed. The coordinative N→In bonds of the five‐coordinate indium complexes show dynamic dissociation/association processes. 1—6 were found to be useful reagents for the partial kinetic resolution of 2‐carbomethoxy‐1, 1′‐binaphthyl triflate.     

Reaktionen von metall-koordiniertem kohlenmonoxid mit yliden: XVII. Darstellung eines molybdän- und wolframkomplexes mit η3-gebundenem trimethylsiloxybutenon-liganden durch silylierung der phosphonium-metall-enolat-vorstufe

The reaction of the phosphonium metallates Me₄P[C₅R₅(CO)(Me₃P)$\text{MC(O)=CHC(O}$)R′] (M = W, R = H, R′ = Et (1a); M = Mo, R = Me, R′ = Me (1b)) with the silylating reagent Me₃SiOSO₂CF₃ yields the neutral complexes C₅R₅(CO)(Me₃P)$\text{MC(OSiMe}{}_3\text{)=CHC(O}$)R (2a, 2b) bearing a chelating O(2), C(4)-trimethylsiloxybutenone ligand. The structure of the new compounds is established by the IR, ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectra.     

Metallacumulenylidene complexes in the [(η5-C5Me5)(η2-dppe)Fe(=C(=C)nR2)]X (n = 0, 1, 2) series: investigations of the iron-carbon bonding by Mössbauer spectroscopy and X-ray analyses

The synthesis of the iron allenylidene complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=C=C=C(Ph)Ph)][X] (5a, X = PF₆, 95%; 5b, X = BPh₄, 91%; dppe = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) was achieved by reacting the complex (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)FeCl (10) with 1 equiv of 1,1-diphenyl-prop-2-yn-1-ol in methanol in the presence of KPF₆ or NaBPh₄. Surprisingly, when the reaction was carried out in the presence of the tetraphenylborate anion, the final product contained both 5b and the hydroxyvinylidene [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=C=C(H)C(OH)(Ph)₂)][BPh₄] (14b) in the 1:1 ratio. Further treatment of the mixture with Amberlyst 15 in methanol provided the allenylidene 5b as a pure sample. The allenylidene complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=C=C=C(Me)Ph)][PF₆] (6) and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=C=C=C(Me)Et)][PF₆] (7) were prepared according to the same procedure and they were isolated as purple powders in 90% yield. The X-ray crystal structures were determined for the vinylidene complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=C=CH₂)][PF₆] (3) and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=C=C(Ph)H)][PF₆] (4), and the allenylidene derivative 5a. In the homogeneous series of complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η²-dppe)Fe(=(C)_n(R)R’)][PF₆], (n = 1, R = H, R′ = Me, X = PF₆, 1; n =1, R = H, R’ = OMe, X = PF₆, 2a; n = 1, R = H, R’ = OMe, X = CF₃OSO₂, 2b; n = 2, R = R′ = H, X = PF₆, 3; n = 2, R = H, R′ = Ph, X = PF₆, 4; n = 3, R = R′ = Ph, X = PF₆, 5a; n = 3, R = R′ = Ph, X = BPh₄, 5b; n = 3, R = Me, R′ = Ph, X = PF₆, 6; n = 3, R = Me, R′ = Et, X = PF₆, 7; n = 3, R = Me, R′ = OMe, X = BPh₄, 8), an empiric relationship between the Mössbauer parameters, δ and QS, was found. This observation would indicate that the positive charge on the iron nucleus decreases with the Fe=C bond order. Moreover, in this series of iron cumulenylidene derivatives, comparison of the variation of the metal–carbon bond distances determined by X-ray analyses with the Mössbauer QS values allows the observation of a linear correlation (R = 0.99). To cite this article: G. Argouarch et al., C. R. Chimie 6 (2003).     

Homo- and hetero-dinuclear derivatives of aluminium containing Schiff-base ligands: synthesis,characterization and antibacterial activity of mononuclear derivative of aluminium

Reactions of Al(OPrⁱ)₃ with LH₂ =?[R′C(NYOH)CHC(R)OH] R=R′=CH₃, Y =?(CH₂)₂ (L¹H₂); R =?CH₃, R′ =?C₆H₅, Y =?(CH₂)₂ (L²H₂); R =?R′ =?CH₃, Y =?(CH₂)₃ (L³H₂); R =?CH₃, R′ =?C₆H₅, Y =?(CH₂)₃ (L⁴H₂), in 1 : 2 molar ratio give mononuclear derivatives of aluminium AlLLH (1a–1d). Equimolar reactions of AlLLH with M(OPrⁱ)₃ (M =?Al and B) yield homo- and hetero-dinuclear derivatives AlLLM(OPrⁱ)₂ (M=Al=2a–2d M=B=3a–3d). Reaction of 2a with L¹H₂ affords AlL¹L¹AlL¹ (4). All these derivatives have been characterized by elemental analysis, molecular weight measurements and plausible structures have been suggested on the basis of IR, NMR [¹H, ¹³C, ²⁷Al and ¹¹B] spectral data and FAB-mass studies of 2b and 3b. Schiff base L¹H₂ and its mononuclear derivative with aluminium (AlL¹L¹H) have been screened for their antibacterial activity against Escherischia coli and Bacillus subtilis.     

Synthesis and characterization of modular polyphosphonate homopolymers and copolymers

Linear polyphosphonates with the generic formula –[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_n– (X = S or Se) have been synthesized by polycondensations of P(Ph)(NEt₂)₂ and a diol (HOR′OH = 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, 1,4-benzenedimethanol, tetraethylene glycol, or 1,12-dodecanediol) followed by reaction with a chalcogen. Random copolymers have been synthesized by polycondensations of P(Ph)(NEt₂)₂ and mixture of two of the diols in a 2:1:1 mol ratio followed by reaction with a chalcogen. Block copolymers with the generic formula –[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_{(x + 2)} –[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_{(x + 3)}– (X = S or Se) have been synthesized by the polycondensations of Et₂N[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_{(x + 2)}P(Ph)NEt₂ oligomers with HOR′O[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_{(x + 3)}H oligomers followed by reaction with a chalcogen. The Et₂N[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_{(x + 2)}P(Ph)NEt₂ oligomers are prepared by the reaction of an excess of P(Ph)(NEt₂)₂ with a diol while the HOR′O[P(Ph)(X)OR′O]_{(x + 3)}H oligomers are prepared by the reaction of P(Ph)(NEt₂)₂ with an excess of the diol. In each case the excess, x is the same and determines the average block sizes. All of the polymers were characterized using ¹H, ¹³C{¹H}, and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy, TGA, DSC, and SEC. ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy demonstrates that the random and block copolymers have the expected arrangements of monomers and, in the case of block copolymers, verifies the block sizes. All polymers are thermally stable up to ~300°C, and the arrangements of monomers in the copolymers (block vs. random) affect their degradation temperatures and T_g profiles. The polymers have weight average MWs of up to 3.8 × 10⁴ Da.     

A Dimeric Gallium Hydrazide as an Active Lewis Pair – Complexation and Activation of Me2GaH and Various Heterocumulenes

Treatment of the dimeric gallium hydrazide [Me₂Ga‐N(2‐Ad)‐NC₅H₁₀]₂ ( 5 ) with Me₂GaH resulted in the formation of an adduct 6 by Ga–N bond cleavage and coordination of the metal hydride via a Ga–N and a 3c–2e Ga–H–Ga bond. This reaction reflects the typical behavior of frustrated Lewis pairs. Reactions with heterocumulenes R–N=C=X (R = Ph, CMe₃, Dipp, X = O; R = Ph, X = S) or X=C=X (X = O, S) resulted in the formation of the cyclic Ga–N insertion products Me₂Ga–N(R)C(O)N(2‐Ad)‐NC₅H₁₀ ( 7a – c ), Me₂GaS₂C‐N(2‐Ad)‐NC₅H₁₀ ( 8 ) or Me₂GaX₂C‐N(2‐Ad)‐NC₅H₁₀ [X = O ( 9 ); S ( 10 )] in moderate to good yields. Three different structural motifs were observed in the solid state: Five‐membered GaNCN₂ heterocycles with exocyclic C=O bonds for compounds 7a – c , four‐membered GaSCN or GaSCS heterocycles for compounds 8 and 9 (chelating coordination of the Ga atoms by SCN and CS₂ ligands) and an eight‐membered (GaOCO)₂ heterocycle for the dimeric CO₂ insertion product 10 . Treatment of 5 with PhCN or Ph₂CO resulted in a completely different reaction and afforded a dimeric Ga imide 11a or an alcoholate 11b . These reactions may start by retro‐hydrogallation with the formation of H₁₀C₅N–N=C(C₉H₁₄) and Me₂GaH and proceed by addition of the metal hydride to the polar multiple bonds of the nitrile or ketone.     

Synthesis of Boron–Nitrogen–Phosphorus Compounds from N-Silylphosphoranimines

Two modes of reactivity of N-silylphosphoranimines have been utilized to prepare the title compounds containing either B–N=P or Si–N=P–N–B linkages. First, silicon-nitrogen bond cleavage reactions of the N-silylphosphoranimines, Me₃SiN=PMe(R)OCH₂CF₃ (1: R=Me, 2: R=Ph), with various chloroboranes gave the new N-borylphosphoranimines, Ph(Me₂N)B–N=PMe₂OCH₂CF₃ (2) and [(Me₃Si)₂N](Cl)B–N=PMe₂OCH₂CF₃ (10). In other cases, however, the expected B–N=P products were unstable and cyclic phosphazenes [Me(R)P=N]_3,4 were obtained. Second, deprotonation-substitution reactions of the aminophosphoranimines, Me₃SiN=P(R)Me–N(R)H, were used to prepare a series of novel (borylamino)-phosphoranimines, Me₃SiN=P(R)(Me)–N(R)–B(NMe₂)₂ (18: R=Me, R=t-Bu; 19: R=R=Me; 20: R=Ph, R=t-Bu; 21: R=Ph, R=Me) and Me₃SiN=PMe₂–N(t-Bu)–B(Ph)X (22: X=NMe₂, 23: X=OCH₂CF₃). All of the new boron–nitrogen–phosphorus products were fully characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, and ³¹P) spectroscopy and elemental analysis.     

Monomere Dialkylmetallkomplexe des Typs R2M(NR′)2XR mit M = Al,Ga, In,TI; X = S,C und R,R′ = Alkyl und Silyl

Monomeric Dialkyl Metal Complexes of the R₂M(NR′)₂XR Type with M = Al, Ga, In, Tl; X = S, C and R, R′ = Alkyl and Silyl N,N′-Bis(trimethylsilyl)sulfurdiimide reacts with the trimethyl derivatives of aluminium, gallium, and indium within insertion. Hereby monomeric sulfinic acid imidamidates Me₂M(NSiMe₃)₂SMe (Me = CH₃) are formed. The lithium amidinates Li(NR′)₂CMe (R′ = i-C₃H₇ and SiMe₃) are formed likewise by insertion reactions with LiMe and the corresponding carbodiimides R′N?C?NR′ and were used in reactions with R₂MCl (M = Al to Tl) to synthesize dialkyl metal amidinates R₂M(NR′)₂CMe. The NMR (¹H and ¹³C) and the vibrational spectra (IR and Raman) are discussed and applied to describe the structure of these chelat complexes.     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Modification of Yttrium Silyl-Bridged Amide Alkyl Complexes through Si−H/C−H Cross-Dehydrocoupling of Silanes with a Silylamino Ligand: Synthesis,Reactivity, and Mechanism

A new method for the modification of a silylamino ligand has been developed through mono and dual C(sp³)−H/Si−H cross-dehydrocoupling with silanes. The reaction of [LY{η²-(C,N)-CH₂Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}] (L=bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-β-diketiminato, L′ ( 1^L ′); L=tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate, Tp^Me2 ( 1^TpMe2 )) with 2 equivalents of PhSiH₃ in toluene gave the complexes [LY{η²-(C,N)-C(SiH₂Ph)₂Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}] (L=L′ ( 2^L’ ); L=Tp^Me2 ( 2^TpMe2 )). Moreover, 1^TpMe2 reacted with the secondary silanes Ph₂SiH₂ and Et₂SiH₂ to afford the corresponding mono C−H activation products [Tp^Me2Y{η²-(C,N)-CH(SiHR₂)Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}] (R=Ph ( 4 b ); R=Et ( 4 c )). The equimolar reaction of 1^TpMe2 with PhSiH₃ also produced the mono C−H activation product 4 a ([Tp^Me2Y{η²-(C,N)-CH(SiH₂Ph)Si(Me₂)NSiMe₃}(thf)]). A study of their reactivity showed that 4 a facilely reacted with 2 equivalents of benzothiazole by an unusual 1,1-addition of the C=N bond of the benzothiazolyl unit to the Si−H bond to give the C−H/Si−H cross-dehydrocoupling product [(Tp^Me2)Y{η³-(N,N,N)-N(SiMe₃)SiMe₂CH₂Si(Ph)(CSC₆H₄N)(CHSC₆H₄N)}] ( 5 ). These results indicate that this modification endows the silylamino ligand with novel reactivity.     

Synthese und Struktur C,N‐difunktionalisierter Sulfinimidamide

Synthesis and Structure of C,N‐difunctionalized Sulfinimideamides Sulfurdiimides RN=S=NR ( 1 a , b ) react in diethyl ether with two equivalents of lithiummethyl to give dimeric C,N‐dilithiummethylenesulfinimideamide ether adducts {Li₂[H₂C–S(NR)₂ · Et₂O]}₂ ( 2 a , b ) ( a : R = ^tBu, b : R = SiMe₃). Metathesis of 2 b with four equivalents of Me₃SiCl, Me₃SnCl or Ph₃SnCl yields the corresponding C,N‐bis‐substituted sulfinimideamides R₃EH₂C–S[N(SiMe₃)₂]NER₃ ( 3 – 5 ) ( 3 : R = Me, E = Sn; 4 : R = Ph, E = Sn; 5 : R = Me, E = Si). The crystal structures of 2 a and 2 b were determined by X‐ray structure analysis. Both compounds form centrosymmetric cage structures consisting of two distorted face sharing cubes ( 2 a : space group P1 (No. 2); Z = 2 (4 · 0,5); 2 b : space group C2/c (No. 15), Z = 4).     

The First Butyltin(IV) Homo- and Heterobimetallic Diethanolaminates

Equimolar reactions of BuSn(OPrⁱ)₃ with diethanolamines, RN(CH₂CH₂ OH) ₂ (abbreviated as RdeaH₂, where R = H or Me), afford dimeric isopropoxo-bridged six-coordinate butyltin(IV) complexes [{Bu(η³-Rdea)Sn(μ-OPrⁱ)}₂] (R = H ( 1 ), Me ( 2 )). Interactions between BuSn(OPrⁱ)₃ and diethanolamines (RdeaH₂) in a 1:2 molar ratio yield monomeric derivatives of the type [BuSn(Rdea)(RdeaH)] (R = H ( 3 ), R = Me ( 4 )). These homometallic complexes on 1:1 reactions with an appropriate metal alkoxide form monomeric heterobimetallic complexes of the type [BuSn (Rdea)₂ {M(OR′)_n}] (R = H, M = Al, R′ = Prⁱ, n = 2 ( 5 ); R = H, M = Ti, R = Prⁱ, n = 3 ( 6 ); R = H, M = Zr, R′ = Prⁱ, n = 3 ( 7 ); R = Me, M = Al, R′ = Prⁱ, n = 2 ( 8 ); R = Me, M = Ti, R′ = Prⁱ, n = 3 ( 9 ); R = Me, M = Ge, R′ = Et, n = 3 ( 10 )). The driving force behind this work was (i) to explore the utility of homometal complexes ( 1 ) –( 4 ) in assembling a metal alkoxide fragment via a condensation reaction and (ii) to gain insights into the structures of new compounds by NMR spectral data. All of these derivatives have been characterized by elemental analysis, spectroscopic (IR, NMR; ¹H, ²⁷Al, and ¹¹⁹Sn) studies, and molecular weight measurements. ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectral studies indicate that both the homometallic ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) and heterobimetallic ( 5 ) – ( 9 ) complexes exist in a solution in an equilibrium of six- and five-coordinated tin(IV) species.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von funktionalisierten Stibanidokomplexen des Eisens und Rutheniums [(η5-C5Me5)(CO)2MSbR1R2] (M = Fe,Ru; R1, R2 = SiMe3, C(O)tBu,C(O)Ph,C(O)-1 Ad)

Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of Functionalized Stibanido Complexes of Iron and Ruthenium [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂MSbR¹R²] (M = Fe, Ru; R¹, R² = SiMe₃, C(O) t Bu, C(O)Ph, C(O)-1 Ad) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂RuSb(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 b ) and the carboxylic chlorides RC(O)Cl (R = tBu, Ph, 1-adamantyl) afforded the acyl(trimethylsilyl)stibanido complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂RuSb · {C(O)R}(SiMe₃)] 2 b (R = tBu), 4 b (R = Ph), and 6 b (R = 1-Ad). The treatment of 1 b with two molar equivalents of pivaloyl chloride and benzoyl chloride led to the diacylstibanido complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂RuSb{C(O)R}₂] ( 3 b , 5 b ). Analogously, the iron complex [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeSb · (SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a ) is converted into the corresponding diacylstibanido complexes 3 a (R = tBu), 5 a (R = Ph) and 7 a (R = 1-Ad) by an excess of acid chloride. The treatment of 1 a with equimolar amounts of RC(O)Cl gave inseparable mixtures of starting material and the monoacyl- and diacyl stibanido complexes. Oxalyl chloride reacted quantitatively with two equivalents of 1 a to give complex [{(η⁵-C₅Me₅) · (CO)₂FeSb(SiMe₃)C(O)}₂] ( 8 ). The molecular structures of 1 a , 2 b and 5 b were elucidated by single crystal X-ray analyses.