Reaktionen von Nitrilen mit tBuAsLi2

Reactions of Nitriles with ^tBuAsLi₂ ^tBuAsLi₂ reacts with the α‐acidic nitrile malonicaciddinitrile in THF/TMEDA under deprotonation and formation of the coordination polymer [{Li(TMEDA}{HC(CN)₂}]_n ( 1 ). The more base‐stable PhCN gives with ^tBuAsLi₂ under aromatization the salt [Li(Diglyme)₂][Li(TMEDA){As[NC(Ph)NC(Ph)]}₂] ( 2 ), containing a diazaarsolide. 1 and 2 were characterized by NMR and vibrational spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and X‐ray analyses. According to that, 1 contains in the solid state infinite helical chains of cations and anions, running along [010]. 2 consists of distorted octahedrally coordinated Li⁺ ion, [Li(diglyme)₂]⁺, and the complex anion [Li(TMEDA){As[NC(Ph)NC(Ph)]}₂]^‐ with a distorted tetrahedrally environment of the Li⁺ ion.     

Sesquialkoxide von Gallium und Indium

Sesquialkoxides of Gallium and Indium Treatment of GaMe₃ with one equivalent of HO^cHex in toluene at 20 °C leads to [Me₂GaO^cHex]₂ ( 4 ) under evolution of methane. The reaction of InMe₃ with two equivalents of HO^cHex leads under similar conditions not to [MeIn(O^cHex)₂]_n but to the sesquialkoxide [In{Me₂In(O^cHex)₂}₃] ( 5 ). 5 can be described also as [{Me₂InO^cHex)}₂{MeIn(O^cHex)₂}₂]. The use of an excess of cyclohexanol in boiling toluene gives the same result. Under these reflux conditions, the reaction of GaMe₃ with an excess of PhCH₂OH leads exclusively to another type of sequialkoxides, [Ga{MeGa(OCH₂Ph)₃}₃] ( 6 ). 4 — 6 were characterized by NMR, vibrational and MS spectra, as well as by X‐ray structure determinations. According to this, 4 forms centrosymmetrical and therefore planar Ga₂O₂ four‐membered rings. 5 and 6 possess basically the same structural motif, central M³⁺ ion ( 5 : In³⁺; 6 : Ga³⁺) coordinated by three metalate units ( 5 : [Me₂In(O^cHex)₂]^—; 6 : [MeGa(OCH₂Ph)₃]^—). The central M³⁺ ions have always coordination number (CN) six while the three surrounding metal ions possess CN 4. Because of the spectroscopic findings 6 must exist in two isomers (1:1). The C₃‐symmetrical isomer C₃‐ 6 was characterized by X‐ray analysis, while the isomer C₁‐ 6 could by described mainly by the complex NMR data.     

Lithium‐ und Caesium‐Alkoxometallate

Lithium and Cesium Alkoxometalates The aluminium alkoxide, Al(OCH₂Ph)₃ ( 1 ), can be obtained from a direct synthesis of Al and PhCH₂OH under HgCl₂ catalysis. The formation of the metalate [{(Diglyme)Li}{Al(O^tBu)₄}] ( 2 ) from LiAlH₄ and ^tBuOH in THF under evolution of hydrogen takes place, if the reaction product is heated under reflux with additional ^tBuOH in diglyme. The nucleophilic attack of F^– ions leads during the treatment of CsF on a THF solution of Al(O^cHex)₃ after ligand redistribution to the coordination polymer [{Cs(THF)₂}{Cs(THF)}{Al(O^cHex)₄}₂]_n ([3]_n). 1 , 2 , and 3 were characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques as well as by crystal structure analyses. According to them 1 is present as tetramer in solution and the solid state. The central structural motif of the metalate 2 is a heteronuclear and planar LiO₂Al four‐membered ring with a penta‐coordinated Li⁺ ion. In the chainlike coordination polymer [ 3 ]_n Cs⁺ ions with coordination number five and six occupy alternating positions.     

Metallat‐Ionen [Al(OR)4]— als Chelatliganden für Übergangsmetall‐Kationen

Metalat Ions [Al(OR)₄]^— as Chelating Ligands for Transition Metal Cations Waterfree CoCl₂ can be reacted with [{Li(Diglyme)}{Al(O^tBu)₄}] in THF to the complex [Li(THF)₄][{CoCl₂}{Al(O^tBu)₄}]. Addition of diglyme to the reaction mixtures gives the blue compound [Li(diglyme)₂][{CoCl₂}{Al(O^tBu)₄}] ( 1 ). According to this procedure the Fe^II complex [Li(Diglyme)₂][{FeCl₂}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}] ( 2 ) was formed by treatment of FeCl₂ with Li[Al(O^tBu)₄]. [{Li(diglyme)}{Al(O^tBu)₄}] in THF/diglyme can be used as alkoxide transfer reagent on TiCl₄ to give the neutral complex [TiCl₂(O^tBu)₂(diglyme)] ( 3 ). The sky‐blue salt [Li(THF)₄]₂[{CoCl₂}₃{Al(OCH₂Ph)₄}₂] ( 4 ) was obtained by reaction of Li[Al(OCH₂Ph)₄] with CoCl₂ in THF. By treatment of 4 with diglyme ligand redistribution was observed giving the sky‐blue compound [Li(Diglyme)₂]₂[{CoCl₂}₃{Al(OCH₂Ph)₄}₂] ( 5 ) and the violet salt [Li(Diglyme)₂]₂[Co₂Cl₅(OCH₂Ph)] ( 6 ). A similar salt can be synthesized also directly from Li[Al(O^tBu)₄] and CoCl₂ in diglyme to give [Li(Diglyme)₂]₂[Co₂Cl₅(O^tBu)] ( 7 ). 1 — 7 were characterized by IR spectroscopy, partly by mass spectrometry and X‐ray analyses. UV‐VIS spectra were recorded from 1 and 5 . According to the X‐ray analyses the M^II ions as well as the Al^III ions are coordinated distorted tedrahedrally. In 1 , 2 , 4 und 5 the unit [Al(OR)₄]^— acts a chelating ligand as desired.     

EINIGE NEUE THIOPHOSPHINSÄUREAMIDE R2P(S)NHR': SYNTHESE UND KERNRESONANZSPEKTROSKOPISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGEN

Abstract

P.P-Dialkylthiophosphinsäureamide R₂P(S)NHR' (R=Me, 'Pr, 'Bu; R'=Me, Et, ⁱPr. ^cHex. ^tBu. Ph. etc.) wurden erhalten durch Umsetzung von R₂PNHR' mit Schwefel oder durch Reaktion von Me₂P(S)CI mit primaren Aminen. Ihre ³¹P- und ¹³C-NMR-Spektren werden diskutiert. Insbesondere die Di-t-butylthiophosphinsäureamide sind auszilg;ergewöhnlich stabil gegen Hydrolyse und Luftsauerstoff. P,P-Dialkylthiophosphinic acid amides R₂P(S)NHR' (R=Me. ⁱPr. ^tBu; R'=Me, Et, ⁱPr, ^cHex. ^tBu, Ph. etc.) have been obtained by reaction of the corresponding aminophosphines with sulfur or by reaction of dimethylthiophosphorylhalides with primary amines. Their ³¹P- and ¹³C-NMR spectra are discussed. The di-t-butylthiophosphinic compounds proved to be remarkably stable against moisture and oxygen.     

Amidoverbindungen von Aluminium und Gallium

Amido Derivatives of Aluminium and Gallium The treatment of GaCl₃ with LiN^cHex₂ (^cHex = C₆H₁₁) in the molar ratio 1 : 3 or 1 : 4 in THF at 20 °C gives the gallium amide Ga(N^cHex₂)₃ ( 1 ) which is monomer in solution and the solid state. Under similar conditions the reaction of AlCl₃ and GaCl₃ with LiN(CH₂Ph)₂ in the molar ration of 1 : 4 leads to the amido metalates [Li(THF)₄][M{N(CH₂Ph)₂}₄] (M = Al ( 2 ), Ga ( 3 )). 1 – 3 have been characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques as well as by X‐Ray analyses. According to them 2 and 3 consist of separate ions [Li(THF)₄]⁺ and [M{N(CH₂Ph)₃}₄]^–. The reason for the monomeric character of 1 is the sterical demand of the N^cHex₂ group.     

Synthesis and redox behaviour of the chalcogenocarbonyl dianions [(E)C(PPh(2)S)(2)](2-): formation and structures of chalcogen-chalcogen bonded dimers and a novel selone

The lithium salts of the chalcogenocarbonyl dianions [(E)C(PPh₂S)₂]^2? (E=S ( 4 b ), Se ( 4 c )) were produced through the reactions between Li₂[C(PPh₂S)₂] and elemental chalcogens in the presence of tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA). The solid‐state structure of {[Li(TMEDA)]₂[(Se)C(PPh₂S)₂]}—[{Li(TMEDA)}₂ 4 c ]—was shown to be bicyclic with the Li⁺ cations bis‐S,Se‐chelated by the dianionic ligand. One‐electron oxidation of the dianions 4 b and 4 c with iodine afforded the diamagnetic complexes {[Li(TMEDA)]₂[(SPh₂P)₂CEEC(PPh₂S)₂]} ([Li(TMEDA)]₂ 7 b (E=S), [Li(TMEDA)]₂ 7 c (E=Se)), which are formally dimers of the radical anions [(E)C(PPh₂S)₂]^{? .} (E=S ( 5 b ), Se ( 5 c )) with elongated central E? E bonds. Two‐electron oxidation of the selenium‐containing dianion 4 c with I₂ yielded the LiI adduct of a neutral selone {[Li(TMEDA)][I(Se)C(PPh₂S)₂]}—[{LiI(TMEDA)} 6 c ]—whereas the analogous reaction with 4 b resulted in the formation of 7 b followed by protonation to give {[Li(TMEDA)][(SPh₂P)₂CSS(H)C(PPh₂S)₂]}—[Li(TMEDA)] 8 b . Attempts to identify the transient radicals 5 b and 5 c by EPR spectroscopy in conjunction with DFT calculations of the electronic structures of these paramagnetic species and their dimers are also described. The crystal structures of [{Li(TMEDA)}₂ 4 c ], [{LiI(TMEDA)} 6 c ] ? C₇H₈, [Li(TMEDA)]₂ 7 b? (CH₂Cl₂)_0.33, [Li(THF)₂]₂ 7 b , [Li(TMEDA)]₂ 7 c , [Li(TMEDA)] 8 b? (CH₂Cl₂)₂ and [Li([12]crown‐4)₂] 8 b were determined and salient structural features are discussed.     

Chiral Fluorinated α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Enantioselective Synthesis and Electrophilic Capture,Racemization Dynamics,and Structure

Enantiomerically pure triflones R¹CH(R²)SO₂CF₃ have been synthesized starting from the corresponding chiral alcohols via thiols and trifluoromethylsulfanes. Key steps of the syntheses of the sulfanes are the photochemical trifluoromethylation of the thiols with CF₃Hal (Hal=halide) or substitution of alkoxyphosphinediamines with CF₃SSCF₃. The deprotonation of RCH(Me)SO₂CF₃ (R=CH₂Ph, iHex) with nBuLi with the formation of salts [RC(Me)? SO₂CF₃]Li and their electrophilic capture both occurred with high enantioselectivities. Displacement of the SO₂CF₃ group of (S)‐MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)SO₂CF₃ (95 % ee) by an ethyl group through the reaction with AlEt₃ gave alkane MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)Et of 96 % ee. Racemization of salts [R¹C(R²)SO₂CF₃]Li follows first‐order kinetics and is mainly an enthalpic process with small negative activation entropy as revealed by polarimetry and dynamic NMR (DNMR) spectroscopy. This is in accordance with a C_α? S bond rotation as the rate‐determining step. Lithium α‐(S)‐trifluoromethyl‐ and α‐(S)‐nonafluorobutylsulfonyl carbanion salts have a much higher racemization barrier than the corresponding α‐(S)‐tert‐butylsulfonyl carbanion salts. Whereas [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂tBu]Li/DMPU (DMPU = dimethylpropylurea) has a half‐life of racemization at ?105 °C of 2.4 h, that of [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li at ?78 °C is 30 d. DNMR spectroscopy of amides (PhCH₂)₂NSO₂CF₃ and (PhCH₂)N(Ph)SO₂CF₃ gave N? S rotational barriers that seem to be distinctly higher than those of nonfluorinated sulfonamides. NMR spectroscopy of [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂R]M (M=Li, K, NBu₄; R=CF₃, tBu) shows for both salts a confinement of the negative charge mainly to the C_α atom and a significant benzylic stabilization that is weaker in the trifluoromethylsulfonyl carbanion. According to crystal structure analyses, the carbanions of salts {[PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li? L }₂ ( L =2 THF, tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA)) and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ have the typical chiral C_α? S conformation of α‐sulfonyl carbanions, planar C_α atoms, and short C_α? S bonds. Ab initio calculations of [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]^? and [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]^? showed for the fluorinated carbanion stronger n_C→σ* and n_O→σ* interactions and a weaker benzylic stabilization. According to natural bond orbital (NBO) calculations of [R¹C(R²)SO₂R]^? (R=tBu, CF₃) the n_C→σ*_{S? R} interaction is much stronger for R=CF₃. Ab initio calculations gave for [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,C_α contact ion pair (CIP) and for [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,O CIP. According to cryoscopy, [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li, [iHexC(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li, and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ predominantly form monomers in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at ?108 °C. The NMR spectroscopic data of salts [R¹(R²)SO₂R³]Li (R³=tBu, CF₃) indicate that the dominating monomeric CIPs are devoid of C_α? Li bonds.     

Potential Precursors for Terminal Methylidene Rare-Earth-Metal Complexes Supported by a Superbulky Tris(pyrazolyl)borato Ligand

A series of solvent-free heteroleptic terminal rare-earth-metal alkyl complexes stabilized by a superbulky tris(pyrazolyl)borato ligand with the general formula [Tp^tBu,MeLnMeR] have been synthesized and fully characterized. Treatment of the heterobimetallic mixed methyl/tetramethylaluminate compounds [Tp^tBu,MeLnMe(AlMe₄)] (Ln=Y, Lu) with two equivalents of the mild halogenido transfer reagents SiMe₃X (X=Cl, I) gave [Tp^tBu,MeLnX₂] in high yields. The addition of only one equivalent of SiMe₃Cl to [Tp^tBu,MeLuMe(AlMe₄)] selectively afforded the desired mixed methyl/chloride complex [Tp^tBu,MeLuMeCl]. Further reactivity studies of [Tp^tBu,MeLuMeCl] with LiR or KR (R=CH₂Ph, CH₂SiMe₃) through salt metathesis led to the monomeric mixed-alkyl derivatives [Tp^tBu,MeLuMe(CH₂SiMe₃)] and [Tp^tBu,MeLuMe(CH₂Ph)], respectively, in good yields. The SiMe₄ elimination protocols were also applicable when using SiMe₃X featuring more weakly coordinating moieties (here X=OTf, NTf₂). X-ray structure analyses of this diverse set of new [Tp^tBu,MeLnMeR/X] compounds were performed to reveal any electronic and steric effects of the varying monoanionic ligands R and X, including exact cone-angle calculations of the tridentate tris(pyrazolyl)borato ligand. Deeper insights into the reactivity of these potential precursors for terminal alkylidene rare-earth-metal complexes were gained through NMR spectroscopic studies.     

[(TMEDA)Co(NO)2][BPh4]: A versatile synthetic entry point to four and five coordinate {Co(NO)2} complexes

[(TMEDA)Co(NO)₂][BPh₄] reacts with Group 1 salts of various monoanionic ligands to yield four and five coordinate {Co(NO)₂}¹⁰ complexes. The synthesis of the four coordinate complex of the form [{LX}Co(NO)₂] via salt-metathesis reactions of [(TMEDA)Co(NO)₂][BPh₄] with [{ArNC(Me)CHC(Me)NAr}Li(OEt₂)] (Ar = 2,6-di-iso-propylphenyl) is reported. In addition [(TMEDA)Co(NO)₂][BPh₄] reacts with either KTp^∗ or a suite of cyclopentadienyllithium and cyclopentadienylsodium reagents, to generate the corresponding five coordinate [{L₂X}Co(NO)₂] complexes ({L₂X = C₅H₅, MeC₅H₄, Cp^∗, ^tBuC₅H₄, Ph₂CHC₅H₄, Me₃SiC₅H₄, ^tBuMe₂SiC₅H₄, ⁱPr₃SiC₅H₄, 1,3-(ⁱPr₃Si)₂C₅H₃ and Tp^∗). In support of existing precedent, the four coordinate complex is a thermally robust and readily isolable species while five coordinate complexes are thermally unstable transient intermediates that may either undergo dissociation of an NO ligand or be trapped by alkenes to form the corresponding metal dinitrosoalkane complexes. These reactions demonstrate that [(TMEDA)Co(NO)₂][BPh₄] provides a versatile synthetic entry point to cobalt dinitrosyl complexes and obviates the need for the repeated use of nitric oxide in the preparation of dinitrosoalkane complexes of cobalt.     

Chiral Lithiated Allylic α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Experimental and Computational Study of Their Structure,Configurational Stability,and Enantioselective Synthesis

X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the lithiated allylic α‐sulfonyl carbanions [CH₂?CHC(Me)SO₂Ph]Li ? diglyme, [cC₆H₈SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA and [cC₇H₁₀SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA showed dimeric and monomeric CIPs, having nearly planar anionic C atoms, only O?Li bonds, almost planar allylic units with strong C?C bond length alternation and the s‐trans conformation around C1?C2. They adopt a C1?S conformation, which is similar to the one generally found for alkyl and aryl substituted α‐sulfonyl carbanions. Cryoscopy of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF at 164 K revealed an equilibrium between monomers and dimers in a ratio of 83:17, which is similar to the one found by low temperature NMR spectroscopy. According to NMR spectroscopy the lone‐pair orbital at C1 strongly interacts with the C?C double bond. Low temperature ⁶Li,¹H NOE experiments of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF point to an equilibrium between monomeric CIPs having only O?Li bonds and CIPs having both O?Li and C1?Li bonds. Ab initio calculation of [MeCH?CHC(Me)SO₂Me]Li ? (Me₂O)₂ gave three isomeric CIPs having the s‐trans conformation and three isomeric CIPs having the s‐cis conformation around the C1?C2 bond. All s‐trans isomers are more stable than the s‐cis isomers. At all levels of theory the s‐trans isomer having O?Li and C1?Li bonds is the most stable one followed by the isomer which has two O?Li bonds. The allylic unit of the C,O,Li isomer shows strong bond length alternation and the C1 atom is in contrast to the O,Li isomer significantly pyramidalized. According to NBO analysis of the s‐trans and s‐cis isomers, the interaction of the lone pair at C1 with the π* orbital of the CC double bond is energetically much more favorable than that with the “empty” orbitals at the Li atom. The C1?S and C1?C2 conformations are determined by the stereoelectronic effects n_C–σ_SR* interaction and allylic conjugation. ¹H DNMR spectroscopy of racemic [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, [iPrCH?CHC(iPr)SO₂tBu]Li and [EtCH?C(Me)C(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in [D₈]THF gave estimated barriers of enantiomerization of ΔG^≠=13.2 kcal mol^?1 (270 K), 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (291 K) and 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (295 K), respectively. Deprotonation of sulfone (R)‐EtCH?CHCH(Et)SO₂tBu (94 % ee) with nBuLi in THF at ?105 °C occurred with a calculated enantioselectivity of 93 % ee and gave carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, the deuteration and alkylation of which with CF₃CO₂D and MeOCH₂I, respectively, proceeded with high enantioselectivities. Time‐dependent deuteration of the enantioenriched carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF gave a racemization barrier of ΔG^≠=12.5 kcal mol^?1 (168 K), which translates to a calculated half‐time of racemization of t_1/2=12 min at ?105 °C.     

N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylethylendiamin-di(tert-butyl)aluminium-Kationen — Molekülstruktur des [(Me3C)2Al · TMEDA]⊕[(Me3C)2AlBr2]⊖

(N,N,N′,N′ -tetramethylethylendiamine) di(tert-butyl)aluminium Cations — Molecular Structure of [(Me₃C)₂Al(TMEDA)]^⊕[(Me₃C)₂AlBr₂]^? Dimeric di(tert-butyl)aluminium halides (Me₃C)₂AlX (X = Cl, Br) react with N,N,N′,N′ -tetramethylethylendiamine (TMEDA) to give three compounds: the salt-like [(Me₃C)₂Al(TMEDA)]^⊕[(Me₃C)₂AlX₂]^? 1 , characterized by crystal structure determination, and [(Me₃C)₂Al(TMEDA)]^⊕X^? 3 both with chelating amine, and the more covalent, pentane soluble (Me₃C)₂AlX(TMEDA) 2 with TMEDA bound by only one nitrogen atom. The reaction resembles the symmetrical and unsymmetrical cleavage of diborane(6). 3 (X = Cl) is also formed by treatment of 1 with boiling n-hexane in the presence of TMEDA over a period of 24 hours, while for X = Br the more covalent 2 is the main product under similar conditions. In solution 2 decomposes slowly yielding different products in dependency of the solvent: in benzene 3 and in n-pentane 1 are formed.     

A Novel Divalent Ytterbium Complex Supported by a Bridged Diamide Ligand: Synthesis and Structure of [{Me2Si(NPh)2Yb(THF)2}(μ3‐Cl)(μ4‐Cl){Li(THF)}2]2·2THF

The reaction of anhydrous YbCl₃ with 1 equiv. of Li₂Me₂Si(NPh)₂ in THF, after workup, yielded a ytterbium(III) chloride [{Me₂Si(NPh)₂Yb}(μ₂‐Cl)(TMEDA)]₂·3PhMe ( 1 ) (TMEDA=tetramethylethanediamine). The same reaction followed by treatment with Na‐K alloy afforded a new ytterbium(II) complex supported by a bridged diamide with four coordinated LiCl molecules, [{Me₂Si(NPh)₂Yb(THF)₂}(μ₃‐Cl)(μ₄‐Cl){Li(THF)}₂]₂·2THF ( 2 ) in high yield. Both complexes were structurally characterized by X‐ray analysis to be dimers. Complex 1 was a chlorine‐bridged dimer with ytterbium in a distorted octahedral geometry. In complex 2 two [Me₂Si(NPh)₂Yb(THF)₂]‐(μ₃‐Cl)[Li(THF)]₂ moieties were connected with each other by two μ₄‐Cl bridges to form a "chair‐form" framework.     

Preparation of Dimethyl and Chloro/Methyl Complexes of Platinum(II) Supported by α‐Diimine Ligands: Trends in the Ease of Oxidation to Platinum(IV)

α‐Diimine ligands react with the platinum(II) alkyl complexes [(Me₂S)PtMe₂]₂ and (Me₂S)₂PtClMe to form (RDAB^R′)PtMe₂ and (RDAB^R′)PtClMe (RDAB^R′=RN=CR′−CR′=NR; R=2,6‐Me₂Ph, 2,6‐(CHMe₂)₂Ph, 3,5‐Me₂Ph, 3,5‐(CF₃)₂Ph, C₆H₁₁; R′=Me, H). The oxidation of these complexes with Cl₂, I₂, N‐chlorosuccinimide, [PtCl₆]²⁻ and (TMEDA)PtMe₂I₂ has been investigated. Attempts to determine the oxidation potentials of the Pt^II complexes electrochemically yielded only irreversible one‐electron oxidations. However, a qualitative ordering of increasing difficulty of oxidation has been determined for the series (RDAB^R′)PtMe₂<(RDAB^R′)PtClMe<(RDAB^R′)PtCl₂≪(RDAB^R′)PtMe(solvent)]⁺. The oxidation proceeds via a two‐electron inner‐sphere electron transfer from a bridged binuclear intermediate. The oxidation of (RDAB^R′)PtMe₂ by (TMEDA)PtMe₂I₂ exhibits characteristic third‐order kinetics, first‐order each in [Pt^II], [Pt^IV] and [I⁻]. Oxidation by a one‐electron process in MeCN solution results in a rapid subsequent disproportionation to Pt^IIMe and Pt^IVMe₃ cations with MeCN occupying the fourth or sixth coordination sites. Single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations for [(2,6‐Me₂PhDAB^Me)PtMe₃(MeCN)]⁺[PtCl₆]_0.5(MeCN) and [(CyDAB^H)PtMe₃(MeCN)]⁺[PtCl₆]_0.5(MeCN) are reported.     

Zum Einfluß der PR3‐Liganden auf Bildung und Eigenschaften der Phosphinophosphiniden‐Komplexe [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PR3)2] und [{η2‐tBu2P1–P2}Pt(P3R3)(P4R′3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes XXI The Influence of the PR₃ Ligands on Formation and Properties of the Phosphinophosphinidene Complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³R₃)(P⁴R′₃)] (R₃P)₂PtCl₂ and C₂H₄ yield the compounds [{η²‐C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PMe₃, PEt₃, PPhEt₂, PPh₂Et, PPh₂Me, PPh₂ⁱPr, PPh₂^tBu and P(p‐Tol)₃); which react with ^tBu₂P–P=PMe^tBu₂ to give the phosphinophosphinidene complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PMe₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PEt₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPhEt₂)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Et)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Me)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂ⁱPr], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂^tBu)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂]. [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] reacts with PMe₃ and PEt₃ as well as with ^tBu₂PMe, PⁱPr₃ and P(c‐Hex)₃ by substituting one PPh₃ ligand to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Me₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Et₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³ⁱPr₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³(c‐Hex)₃)(P⁴Ph₃)]. With ^tBu₂PMe, [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂] forms [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴(p‐Tol)₃)]. The NMR data of the compounds are given and discussed with respect to the influence of the PR₃ ligands.     

Chalcogenide Derivatives of Imidotin Cage Complexes

Reaction of the secocubane [Sn₃(μ₂‐NHtBu)₂(μ₂‐NtBu)(μ₃‐NtBu)] ( 1 ) with dibutylmagnesium produces the heterobimetallic cubane [Sn₃Mg(μ₃‐NtBu)₄] ( 4 ) which forms the monochalcogenide complexes of general formula [ESn₃Mg(μ₃‐NtBu)₄] ( 5 a , E=Se; 5 b , E=Te) upon reaction with elemental chalcogens in THF. By contrast, the reaction of the anionic lithiated cubane [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? with the appropriate quantity of selenium or tellurium leads to the sequential chalcogenation of each of the three Sn^II centres. Pure samples of the mono‐ or dichalcogenides are, however, best obtained by stoichiometric redistribution reactions of [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? and the trichalcogenides [E₃Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? (E=Se, Te). These reactions are conveniently monitored by using ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy. The anion [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? also acts as an effective chalcogen‐transfer reagent in reactions of selenium with the neutral cubane [{Snμ₃‐N(dipp)}₄] ( 8 ) (dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) to give the dimer [(thf)Sn{μ‐N(dipp)}₂Sn(μ‐Se)₂Sn{μ‐N(dipp)}₂Sn(thf)] ( 9 ), a transformation that results in cleavage of the Sn₄N₄ cubane into four‐membered Sn₂N₂ rings. The X‐ray structures of 4 , 5 a , 5 b , [Sn₃Li(thf)(μ₃‐NtBu)₄(μ₃‐Se)(μ₂‐Li)(thf)]₂ ( 6 a ), [TeSn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄][Li(thf)₄] ( 6 b ), [Te₂Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄][Li([12]crown‐4)₂] ( 7 b′′ ) and 9 are presented. The fluxional behaviour of cubic imidotin chalcogenides and the correlation between NMR coupling constants and tin–chalcogen bond lengths are also discussed.     

Direct Observation by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry of [Cp*RhMo3O8(OMe)5]−, a Key Intermediate in the Formation of the Double-Bookshelf-Type Oxide Cluster [(Cp*Rh)2Mo6O20(OMe)2]2−

The use of methanol as solvent is essential for the formation of the double-bookshelf-type oxide cluster [(Cp*Rh)₂Mo₆O₂₀(OMe)₂]²⁻ from [{Cp*Rh(μ-Cl)Cl}₂] and four equivalents of [Mo₂O₇]²⁻. The reaction proceeds via [Cp*RhMo₃O₈(OMe)₅]⁻. The proposed structure for this key intermediate (shown schematically) is supported by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and labeling experiments with CD₃OD as solvent. Cp*=η⁵-C₅Me₅.     

Synthesen und Reaktionen von Aluminiumalkoxid‐Verbindungen

Syntheses and Reactions of Aluminium Alkoxide Compounds Al(O^cHex)₃ ( 1 ) can be synthesized by the reaction of Al with cyclohexanol under evolving of H₂ in boiling xylene. [Li{Al(OCH₂Ph)₄}] ( 2 ) was obtained by treatment of PhCH₂OH with a 1 M solution of LiAlH₄ in THF. [{(THF)Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}Cl] ( 3 ) is the result of the reaction of four equivalents of LiO^tBu on AlCl₃ in THF. 3 is the educt for the reactions with the Lewis‐acids InCl₃ and FeCl₃ in THF leading to the metalates [{(THF)₂Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}] · [MCl₄] [M = In ( 4 ), Fe ( 5 )]. The attempt to react InCl₃ with four equivalents of LiO^tBu leads to only one isolated and characterized product, the complex [Li₄(O^tBu)₃(THF)₃Cl]₂ · THF ( 6 · THF), which can also be synthesized by the treatment of LiCl with three equivalents of LiO^tBu in THF. 1–6 · THF were characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques as well as by X‐ray structure determinations. According to them, 1 , which is tetrameric in solution, is the first structurally characterized example of the proposed trimer form of aluminium alkoxides [ROAl{Al(OR)₄}₂] with a central trigonal bipyramidal coordinated Al atom. 2 forms a coordination polymer with a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere of Li and Al, running along [100]. The trinuclear structure skeleton [{(THF)₂Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}]⁺ is still present in the isotypical metalates 4 and 5 . The counter ions [MCl₄]^– possess nearly T_d symmetry. The remarkable structural motif of 6 · THF are two heterocubanes [Li₄(O^tBu)₃(THF)₃Cl] dimerized by Li–Cl bonds.     

Lanthanide(II) Complexes of the Dihydrotriazinido Ligand [N{C(Ph)=N}2C(tBu)Ph]−

The potassium dihydrotriazinide K(L^Ph,tBu) ( 1 ) was obtained by a metal exchange route from [Li(L^Ph,tBu)(THF)₃] and KOtBu (L^Ph,tBu = [N{C(Ph)=N}₂C(tBu)Ph]). Reaction of 1 with 1 or 0.5 equivalents of SmI₂(thf)₂ yielded the monosubstituted Sm^II complex [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)I(THF)₄] ( 2 ) or the disubstituted [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Attempted synthesis of a heteroleptic Sm^II amido‐alkyl complex by the reaction of 2 with KCH₂Ph produced compound 3 due to ligand redistribution. The Yb^II bis(dihydrotriazinide) [Yb(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 4 ) was isolated from the 1:1 reaction of YbI₂(THF)₂ and 1 . Molecular structures of the crystalline compounds 2 , 3· 2C₆H₆ and 4· PhMe were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Die 3-(N,N-Dimethylamino)prop-1-enyl-Gruppe als Chelatligand in Organoindium-Verbindungen

The 3-(N,N-Dimethylamino)prop-1-enyl Group as a Chelate Ligand in Indium Organyls InBr₃ reacts with Me₂NCH₂CH?CHMgCl (molar ratio 1 : 2) to form (Me₂NCH₂CH?CH)₂InBr ( 1 ) as the first indium alkenyl compound with amino-functionalized alkenyl groups. The X-ray structure determination shows the formation of a chelate complex. 1 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Fddd with the unit cell parameters a = 14.904(2) Å, b = 17.140(1) Å and c = 21.035(2) Å. By reaction of Me₂InBr with Me₂NCH₂CH?CHMgCl (molar ratio 1 : 1) (Me₂NCH₂CH?CH)InMe₂ ( 2 ) is formed as a colorless, at room temperature liquid, monomeric compound. The n.m.r. and mass spectra are discussed.