Shadow Codes over 4

The notion of a shadow of a self-dual binary code is generalized to self-dual codes over ₄. A Gleason formula for the symmetrized weight enumerator of the shadow of a Type I code is derived. Congruence properties of the weights follow; this yields constructions of self-dual codes of larger lengths. Weight enumerators and the highest minimum Lee, Hamming, and Euclidean weights of Type I codes of length up to 24 are studied.     

On the classification and enumeration of self-dual codes

A complete classification is given of all [22, 11] and [24, 12] binary self-dual codes. For each code we give the order of its group, the number of codes equivalent to it, and its weight distribution. There is a unique [24, 12, 6] self-dual code. Several theorems on the enumeration of self-dual codes are used, including formulas for the number of such codes with minimum distance ? 4, and for the sum of the weight enumerators of all such codes of length n. Selforthogonal codes which are generated by code words of weight 4 are completely characterized.     

Further improvements on the Feng–Rao bound for dual codes

Salazar, Dunn and Graham in [16] presented an improved Feng–Rao bound for the minimum distance of dual codes. In this work we take the improvement a step further. Both the original bound by Salazar et al., as well as our improvement are lifted so that they deal with generalized Hamming weights. We also demonstrate the advantage of working with one-way well-behaving pairs rather than weakly well-behaving or well-behaving pairs.     

Binary extremal self-dual codes of length 60 and related codes

We give a classification of four-circulant singly even self-dual [60, 30, d] codes for \(d=10\) and 12. These codes are used to construct extremal singly even self-dual [60, 30, 12] codes with weight enumerator for which no extremal singly even self-dual code was previously known to exist. From extremal singly even self-dual [60, 30, 12] codes, we also construct optimal singly even self-dual [58, 29, 10] codes with weight enumerator for which no optimal singly even self-dual code was previously known to exist. Finally, we give some restriction on the possible weight enumerators of certain singly even self-dual codes with shadow of minimum weight 1.     

Permutation codes with specified packing radius

Most papers on permutation codes have concentrated on the minimum Hamming distance of the code. An (n, d) permutation code (or permutation array) is simply a set of permutations on n elements in which the Hamming distance between any pair of distinct permutations (or codewords) is at least d. An (n, 2e + 1) or (n, 2e + 2) permutation code is able to correct up to e errors. These codes have a potential application to powerline communications. It is known that in an (n, 2e) permutation code the balls of radius e surrounding the codewords may all be pairwise disjoint, but usually some overlap. Thus an (n, 2e) permutation code is generally unable to correct e errors using nearest neighbour decoding. On the other hand, if the packing radius of the code is defined as the largest value of e for which the balls of radius e are all pairwise disjoint, a permutation code with packing radius e can be denoted by [n, e]. Such a permutation code can always correct e errors. In this paper it is shown that, in almost all cases considered, the number of codewords in the best [n, e] code found is substantially greater than the largest number of codewords in the best known (n, 2e + 1) code. Thus the packing radius more accurately specifies the requirement for an e-error-correcting permutation code than does the minimum Hamming distance. The techniques used include construction by automorphism group and several variations of clique search They are enhanced by two theoretical results which make the computations feasible.     

On self-dual codes over {\mathbb{F}}_5

The purpose of this paper is to improve the upper bounds of the minimum distances of self-dual codes over for lengths [22, 26, 28, 32–40]. In particular, we prove that there is no [22, 11, 9] self-dual code over , whose existence was left open in 1982. We also show that both the Hamming weight enumerator and the Lee weight enumerator of a putative [24, 12, 10] self-dual code over are unique. Using the building-up construction, we show that there are exactly nine inequivalent optimal self-dual [18, 9, 7] codes over up to the monomial equivalence, and construct one new optimal self-dual [20, 10, 8] code over and at least 40 new inequivalent optimal self-dual [22, 11, 8] codes.      

<Emphasis Type="Italic">G</Emphasis>-projectable and Λ-projectable binary linear block codes

The binary [24,12,8] Golay code has projection O onto the quaternary [6,3,4] hexacode [9] and the [32,16,8] Reed-Muller code has projection E onto the quaternary self-dual [8,4,4] code [6]. Projection E was extended to projection G in [8]. In this paper we introduce a projection, to be called projection Λ, that covers projections O, E and G. We characterise G-projectable self-dual codes and Λ-projectable codes. Explicit methods for constructing codes having G and Λ projections are given and several so constructed codes that have best known optimal parameters are introduced.      

On non-antipodal binary completely regular codes

Binary non-antipodal completely regular codes are characterized. Using a result on nonexistence of nontrivial binary perfect codes, it is concluded that there are no unknown nontrivial non-antipodal completely regular binary codes with minimum distance d?3. The only such codes are halves and punctured halves of known binary perfect codes. Thus, new such codes with covering radius ρ=6 and 7 are obtained. In particular, a half of the binary Golay [23,12,7]-code is a new binary completely regular code with minimum distance d=8 and covering radius ρ=7. The punctured half of the Golay code is a new completely regular code with minimum distance d=7 and covering radius ρ=6. The new code with d=8 disproves the known conjecture of Neumaier, that the extended binary Golay [24,12,8]-code is the only binary completely regular code with d?8. Halves of binary perfect codes with Hamming parameters also provide an infinite family of binary completely regular codes with d=4 and ρ=3. Puncturing of these codes also provide an infinite family of binary completely regular codes with d=3 and ρ=2. Both these families of codes are well known, since they are uniformly packed in the narrow sense, or extended such codes. Some of these completely regular codes are new completely transitive codes.     

Self-Orthogonal 3-(56,12,65) Designs and Extremal Doubly-Even Self-Dual Codes of Length 56

In this paper, we show that the code generated by the rows of a block-point incidence matrix of a self-orthogonal 3-(56,12,65) design is a doubly-even self-dual code of length 56. As a consequence, it is shown that an extremal doubly-even self-dual code of length 56 is generated by the codewords of minimum weight. We also demonstrate that there are more than one thousand inequivalent extremal doubly-even self-dual [56,28,12] codes. This result shows that there are more than one thousand non-isomorphic self-orthogonal 3-(56,12,65) designs. AMS Classification: 94B05, 05B05     

Generalized Hamming weights of three classes of linear codes

The generalized Hamming weights of a linear code have been extensively studied since Wei first use them to characterize the cryptography performance of a linear code over the wire-tap channel of type II. In this paper, we investigate the generalized Hamming weights of three classes of linear codes constructed through defining sets and determine them partly for some cases. Particularly, in the semiprimitive case we solve a problem left in Yang et al. (2015) [30].     

Self-Dual [24, 12, 8] Quaternary Codes with a Nontrivial Automorphism of Order 3

All (Hermitian) self-dual [24, 12, 8] quaternary codes which have a non-trivial automorphism of order 3 are obtained up to equivalence. There exist exactly 205 inequivalent such codes. The codes under consideration are optimal, self-dual, and have the highest possible minimum distance for this length.     

On the Weight Hierarchy of Product Codes

Let V and W be codes and let C = V W be the product code of V and W. In [6] Wei and Yang, conjectured a formula for the generalized Hamming weights of V W in terms of those of V and W provided that both V and W satisfy the chain condition. Recently the conjecture has been proved by Schaathun [4]. In this paper we generalize the formula to a product code with more than two components.     

Weight Enumerators of Double Circulant Codes and New Extremal Self-Dual Codes

In this paper it is shown that the weight enumerator of a bordered double circulant self-dual code can be obtained from those of a pure double circulant self-dual code and its shadow through a relationship between bordered and pure double circulant codes. As applications, a restriction on the weight enumerators of some extremal double circulant codes is determined and a uniqueness proof of extremal double circulant self-dual codes of length 46 is given. New extremal singly-even [44,22,8] double circulant codes are constructed. These codes have weight enumerators for which extremal codes were not previously known to exist.     

New Optimal Self-Dual Codes over GF(7)

In this paper, double circulant self-dual codes over GF(7) are presented, including [12,6,6] codes which are new optimal codes. It is shown that the supports of the codewords of weights 9, 10 and 11 in double circulant [20,10,9] codes form 3-designs. For larger lengths, some good self-dual codes are constructed from weighing matrices. Received: June 24, 1996 / Revised: February 28, 1997     

Constructions for Permutation Codes in Powerline Communications

A permutation array (or code) of length n and distance d is a set Γ of permutations from some fixed set of n symbols such that the Hamming distance between each distinct x, y ∈ Γ is at least d. One motivation for coding with permutations is powerline communication. After summarizing known results, it is shown here that certain families of polynomials over finite fields give rise to permutation arrays. Additionally, several new computational constructions are given, often making use of automorphism groups. Finally, a recursive construction for permutation arrays is presented, using and motivating the more general notion of codes with constant weight composition.     

New Linear Codes Over \mathbb{F}_3 and \mathbb{F}_5 and Improvements on Bounds

One of the most important problems of coding theory is to constructcodes with best possible minimum distances. In this paper, we generalize the method introduced by [8] and obtain new codes which improve the best known minimum distance bounds of some linear codes. We have found a new linear ternary code and 8 new linear codes over with improved minimumdistances. First we introduce a generalized version of Gray map,then we give definition of quasi cyclic codes and introduce nearlyquasi cyclic codes. Next, we give the parameters of new codeswith their generator matrices. Finally, we have included twotables which give Hamming weight enumerators of these new codes.     

Binary self-dual codes with automorphisms of order 23

The only example of a binary doubly-even self-dual [120,60,20] code was found in 2005 by Gaborit et al. (IEEE Trans Inform theory 51, 402–407 2005). In this work we present 25 new binary doubly-even self-dual [120,60,20] codes having an automorphism of order 23. Moreover we list 7 self-dual [116,58,18] codes, 30 singly-even self-dual [96,48,16] codes and 20 extremal self-dual [92,46,16] codes. All codes are new and present different weight enumerators.      

A symmetric Roos bound for linear codes

The van Lint-Wilson AB-method yields a short proof of the Roos bound for the minimum distance of a cyclic code. We use the AB-method to obtain a different bound for the weights of a linear code. In contrast to the Roos bound, the role of the codes A and B in our bound is symmetric. We use the bound to prove the actual minimum distance for a class of dual BCH codes of length q²−1 over Fq. We give cyclic codes [63,38,16] and [65,40,16] over F₈ that are better than the known [63,38,15] and [65,40,15] codes.