(R)‐4‐(4‐Aminophenyl)‐2,2,4‐trimethylchroman and (S)‐4‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐2,2,4‐trimethylthiachroman

The title compounds, C₁₈H₂₁NO and C₁₈H₂₁NS, in their enantiomerically pure forms are isostructural with the enantiomerically pure 4‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,2,4‐trimethylchroman and 4‐(2,4‐dihydroxyphenyl)‐2,2,4‐trimethylchroman analogues and form extended linear chains via N—H...O or N—H...S hydrogen bonding along the [100] direction. The absolute configuration for both compounds was determined by anomalous dispersion methods with reference to both the Flack parameter and, for the light‐atom compound, Bayesian statistics on Bijvoet differences.     

(S)‐3‐(Ammoniomethyl)‐5‐methylhexanoate (pregabalin)

The title compound, C₈H₁₇NO₂, exists as a zwitterion, adopting a propeller conformation. Molecules self‐assemble to form a hydrogen‐bonded layer parallel to the ab crystallographic plane connected by N⁺—H...O⁻ and C—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds. These layers are stacked along the c axis and are stabilized by van der Waals interactions.     

(E)‐N′‐(4‐Chlorobenzylidene)‐, (E)‐N′‐(4‐bromobenzylidene)‐ and (E)‐N′‐[4‐(diethylamino)benzylidene]‐ derivatives of 4‐hydroxybenzohydrazide

The 4‐chloro‐ [C₁₄H₁₁ClN₂O₂, (I)], 4‐bromo‐ [C₁₄H₁₀BrN₂O₂, (II)] and 4‐diethylamino‐ [C₁₈H₂₁N₃O₂, (III)] derivatives of benzylidene‐4‐hydroxybenzohydrazide, all crystallize in the same space group (P2₁/c), (I) and (II) also being isomorphous. In all three compounds, the conformation about the C=N bond is E. The molecules of (I) and (II) are relatively planar, with dihedral angles between the two benzene rings of 5.75 (12) and 9.81 (17)°, respectively. In (III), however, the same angle is 77.27 (9)°. In the crystal structures of (I) and (II), two‐dimensional slab‐like networks extending in the a and c directions are formed via N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The molecules stack head‐to‐tail viaπ–π interactions involving the aromatic rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.7622 (14) Å in (I) and 3.8021 (19) Å in (II)]. In (III), undulating two‐dimensional networks extending in the b and c directions are formed via N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The molecules stack head‐to‐head viaπ–π interactions involving inversion‐related benzene rings [centroid–centroid distances = 3.6977 (12) and 3.8368 (11) Å].     

(Z)‐5‐[4‐(Dimethylamino)benzylidene]‐2‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)‐1,3‐thiazolidin‐4(5H)‐one

The molecules of the title compound, C₁₇H₂₁N₃OS, are characterized by a wide C—C—C angle at the methine C atom linking the aryl and thiazolidine rings, associated with a short repulsive intramolecular S...H contact between atoms in these two rings. A single piperidine–arene C—H...π hydrogen bond links pairs of molecules into centrosymmetric dimers.     

Electrochemical Reduction of 4,4′‐(2,2,2‐Trichloroethane‐1,1‐diyl)‐ bis(chlorobenzene) (DDT) and 4,4′‐(2,2‐Dichloroethane‐1,1‐diyl)‐ bis(chlorobenzene) (DDD) at Carbon Cathodes in Dimethylformamide

In dimethylformamide containing tetramethylammonium tetrafluoroborate, cyclic voltammograms for reduction of 4,4′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethane‐1,1‐diyl)bis(chlorobenzene) (DDT) at a glassy carbon cathode exhibit five waves, whereas three waves are observed for the reduction of 4,4′‐(2,2‐dichloroethane‐1,1‐diyl)bis(chlorobenzene) (DDD). Bulk electrolyses of DDT and DDD afford 4,4′‐(ethene‐1,1‐diyl)bis(chlorobenzene) (DDNU) as principal product (67–94%), together with 4,4′‐(2‐chloroethene‐1,1‐diyl)bis(chlorobenzene) (DDMU), 1‐chloro‐4‐styrylbenzene, and traces of both 1,1‐diphenylethane and 4,4′‐(ethane‐1,1‐diyl)bis(chlorobenzene) (DDO). For electrolyses of DDT and DDD, the coulometric n values are essentially 4 and 2, respectively. When DDT is reduced in the presence of a large excess of D₂O, the resulting DDNU and DDMU are almost fully deuterated, indicating that reductive cleavage of the carbon–chlorine bonds of DDT is a two‐electron process that involves carbanion intermediates. A mechanistic scheme is proposed to account for the formation of the various products.     

[μ3‐cis‐N‐(2‐Aminoethyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidato(3−)]bis(2,2′‐diamino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thiazole)tetracopper(II) bis(2,4,6‐trinitrophenolate)

The title complex, [Cu₄(C₁₁H₁₀N₃O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄S₂)₂](C₆H₂N₃O₇)₂, consists of a circular tetracopper(II) cation with an embedded inversion centre and two uncoordinated picrate (2,4,6‐trinitrophenolate) anions. The Cu^II cations at the inner sites of N‐(2‐aminoethyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidate(3−) (oxbe) have square‐planar environments and those at the outer sites are in square‐pyramidal geometries. The separations of pairs of Cu^II cations bridged by cis‐oxamide and carboxylate groups are 5.2217 (5) and 5.2871 (5) Å, respectively. The tetracopper(II) cations and picrate anions are connected by N—H...O hydrogen bonds into a two‐dimensional network parallel to the (010) plane, and these two‐dimensional networks are assembled by two types of π–π stacking interactions into a three‐dimensional supramolecular structure.     

Wasserstoffbrücken in 1,1‐Bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐3‐benzoylthioharnstoff und seinen Nickel(II)‐ und Kupfer(II)‐Chelat‐Komplexen

Hydrogen Bonds in 1,1‐Bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐3‐benzoylthiourea and its Nickel(II)‐ and Copper(II)‐Chelate Complexes The ligand 1,1‐bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐3‐benzoylthiourea HL, ( 1 ), yields with nickel(II) and copper(II) ions neutral complexes [NiL₂], ( 2 ), and [CuL₂], ( 3 ). By X‐ray structure analysis and IR spectroscopy different intramolecular hydrogen bonds (OH…O) and (OH…N) could be identified in both equally coordinated ligands of the [NiL₂] molecule. For comparison X‐ray and IR data were also estimated for 1 and 3 .     

catena‐Poly[copper(II)‐di‐μ‐acetylacetonato‐copper(II)‐bis(μ‐4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxybenzaldehyde picoloylhydrazonato)] and (acetylacetonato)(4‐methoxybenzaldehyde picoloylhydrazonato)copper(II)

In the two title copper(II) complexes, [CuL(C₅H₇O₂)]_n, (I), and [CuL′(C₅H₇O₂)], (II), respectively, where HL is 4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxybenzaldehyde picoloylhydrazone, C₁₄H₁₂N₃O₃, and HL′ is 4‐methoxybenzaldehyde picoloylhydrazone, C₁₄H₁₂N₃O₂, the Cu^II ions display a highly Jahn–Teller‐distorted octahedral and a square‐planar coordination geometry, respectively. In complex (I), two neighbouring Cu^II atoms are bridged by L⁻ and acetylacetonate, alternately, giving rise to a one‐dimensional chain of CuN₂O₄ octahedra interconnected by these two ligands along the a axis. In addition, the hydroxy H atom of the vanillin group connects to the carboxyl O atom of the adjacent chain via an O—H...O hydrogen bond, giving rise to a three‐dimensional supramolecular assembly. Complex (II) displays a discrete structure.     

trans‐Cyano(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate) hydrate and trans‐hydroxo(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate)

The crystal structures of a pair of closely related macrocyclic cyano‐ and hydroxopenta­amine­cobalt(III) complexes, as their perchlorate salts, are reported. Although the two complexes, [Co(CN)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O and [Co(OH)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂, exhibit similar conformations, significant differences in the Co—N bond lengths arise from the influence of the sixth ligand (cyano as opposed to hydroxo). The ensuing hydrogen‐bonding patterns are also distinctly different. Disorder in the perchlorate anions was clearly resolved and this was rationalized on the basis of distinct hydrogen‐bonding motifs involving the anion O atoms and the N—H and O—H donors.     

(4,6‐Dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidenepyrimidin‐1‐ium) trichlorido(thiourea‐κS)zinc(II)

The title compound, (C₆H₉N₂S)[ZnCl₃{SC(NH₂)₂}], exists as a zincate where the zinc(II) centre is coordinated by three chloride ligands and a thiourea ligand to form the anion. The organic cation adopts the protonated 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidenepyrimidin‐1‐ium (L) form of 4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione. Two short N—H...Cl hydrogen bonds involving the pyrimidine H atoms and the [ZnCl₃L]⁻ anion form a crystallographically centrosymmetric dimeric unit consisting of two anions and two cations. The packing structure is completed by longer‐range hydrogen bonds donated by the thiourea NH₂ groups to chloride ligand hydrogen‐bond acceptors.     

4‐Amino‐3‐methyl‐6‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one (metamitron) and 4‐amino‐6‐methyl‐3‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one (isometamitron)

The title structures, both C₁₀H₁₀N₄O, are substitutional isomers. The N—N bond lengths are longer and the C=N bond lengths are shorter by ca 0.025 Å than the respective average values in the C=N—N=C group of asymmetric triazines; the assessed respective bond orders are 1.3 and 1.7. There are N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds in both structures, with 4‐­amino‐3‐methyl‐6‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one containing a rare bifurcated N—H⋯N,N hydrogen bond. The structures differ in their mol­ecular stacking and the hydrogen‐bonding patterns.     

A photochromic dinuclear compound: aquatetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)ethanolbis(1,10‐phenanthroline)dilanthanum(III)

The title dinuclear complex, (aqua‐1κO)tetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato‐1:2κ²O:O′)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)‐1κO;2κO‐(ethanol‐2κO)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)‐1κ²N,N′;2κ²N,N′‐dilanthanum(III), [La₂(C₁₅H₁₁O₂)₆(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(C₂H₅OH)(H₂O)], contains two similar La^III centres with distorted [LaO₆N₂] bicapped triganol–prismatic coordination polyhedra formed by six phenylcinnamate (PCA⁻ or 2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoate) ligands, two 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) ligands, a coordinating ethanol molecule and a coordinating water molecule. The two metal centres are bridged by four μ‐PCA⁻ ligands, with the remaining two PCA⁻ ligands coordinated in a monodentate fashion. The noncoordinated carboxylate O atoms on the terminal PCA⁻ ligands form O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the coordinated solvent molecules. Each La centre is also coordinated by a bidentate phen ligand. The PCA⁻ ligands all adopt syn–syn orientations, with the two phenyl rings presenting dihedral angles of about 70°. The compound displays photochromic behaviour both in solution and in the solid state.     

(Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(nitronyl nitroxide) and (Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(iminonitroxide) and Their Copper Complexes

In contrast to diradicals connected by alternant hydrocarbons, only a few studies on those connected by nonalternant hydrocarbons have been reported. The syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of azulene‐1,3‐diyl linked bis(nitronyl nitroxide) (NN₂Az) and bis(iminonitroxide) (IN₂Az) diradicals and their Cu(hfac)₂ (hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetonate) complexes were investigated. NN₂Az was shown to have an intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction with J _obs/k _B=+10.0 K (H =−2J S ₁ ⋅S ₂) between (nitronyl nitroxide) spins, whereas IN₂Az was estimated to have a much weaker intramolecular magnetic interaction. The reactions of NN₂Az and IN₂Az with Cu(hfac)₂ gave a 1:2 [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] complex and a 1:1 [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] ⋅ C₆H₁₂ complex, respectively. [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] showed strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic interactions (J _1‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−800 K, J _2‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−500 K) between the Cu^II spins and the coordinating NN spins, whereas [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] exhibited a ferromagnetic exchange interaction (J _obs‐Cu‐R/k _B=+114 K) between the Cu^II spin and the imino‐coordinated iminonitroxide spin.     

(E)‐3‐(Benzo[b]thiophen‐2‐yl)‐2‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)acrylonitrile and (Z)‐3‐(benzo[b]thiophen‐2‐yl)‐2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)acrylonitrile

The title compounds, C₂₀H₁₇NO₃S, (I), and C₁₉H₁₅NO₂S, (II), were prepared by the reaction of benzo[b]thiophene‐2‐carbaldehyde with (3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)acetonitrile and (3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)acetonitrile, respectively, in the presence of methanolic potassium hydroxide. In (I), the C=C bond linking the benzo[b]thiophene and the 3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl units has E geometry, with dihedral angles between the plane of the bridging unit and the planes of the two adjacent ring systems of 5.2 (3) and 13.1 (2)°, respectively. However, in (II), the C=C bond has Z geometry, with dihedral angles between the plane of the bridging unit and the planes of the adjacent benzo[b]thiophene and 3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl units of 4.84 (17) and 76.09 (7)°, respectively. There are no significant intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions in the packing of (I) and (II). The packing is essentially stabilized via van der Waals forces.     

Tetraphenylphosphonium bis(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolato)aurate(III) acetone solvate and ethyltriphenylphosphonium bis(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolato)aurate(III)

In the two title complexes, (C₂₄H₂₀P)[Au(C₃S₅)₂]·C₃H₆O, (I), and (C₂₀H₂₀P)[Au(C₃S₅)₂], (II), the Au^III atoms exhibit square‐planar coordinations involving four S atoms from two 2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolate (dmit) ligands. The Au—S bond lengths, ranging from 2.3057 (8) to 2.3233 (7) Å in (I) and from 2.3119 (8) to 2.3291 (10) Å in (II), are slightly smaller than the sum of the single‐bond covalent radii. In (I), there are two halves of independent Ph₄P⁺ cations, in which the two P atoms lie on twofold rotation axis sites. The Ph₄P⁺ cations and [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ anions are interspersed as columns in the packing. Layers composed of Ph₄P⁺ and [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ are separated by layers of acetone molecules. In (II), the [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ anions and EtPh₃P⁺ counter‐cations form a layered arrangement, and the [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ anions form discrete pairs with a long intermolecular Au...S interaction for each Au atom in the crystal structure.     

[7,13‐Bis(2‐aminobenzyl)‐1,4,10‐trioxa‐7,13‐diazacyclopentadecane]diisothiocyanatobarium(II)

The X‐ray crystal structure of the title complex, [Ba(NCS)₂(C₂₄H₃₆N₄O₃)], indicates that the Ba^II cation is nine‐coordinate in the solid state, being fully encapsulated by the organic receptor ligand. The receptor adopts a syn arrangement, with both pendant arms oriented on the same side of the crown moiety. The distance between the two amine N atoms is 3.911 (12) Å, while the pivotal N atoms are 5.322 (10) Å apart.     

(5Z)‐4‐Amino‐2‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1H‐imidazol‐5(2H)‐one oxime 3‐oxide

The title molecule, C₉H₁₀N₄O₃, consists of benzene and imidazole rings which are almost perpendicular to each other. A hydroxyimino group is directly linked to the imidazole ring with a double C=N bond, which is the first example in this type of compound. The double bond may be a good location for the initiation of various reactions with a wide range of potential applications. In the crystal structure, there are π–π interactions between molecules related by a centre of symmetry, with the imidazole and benzene rings almost completely overlapped. The molecules are hydrogen bonded in each direction and form a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network.     

Bis[μ3‐cis‐N‐(2‐aminopropyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidato(3–)]bis(2,2′‐bipyridine)dichloridotetracopper(II) dihydrate

The title complex, bis[μ₃‐cis‐N‐(2‐aminopropyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidato(3−)]‐1:2:4κ⁷N,N′,N′′,O:O′,O′′:O′′′;2:3:4κ⁷O′′′:N,N′,N′′,O:O′,O′′‐bis(2,2′‐bipyridine)‐2κ²N,N′;4κ²N,N′‐dichlorido‐1κCl,3κCl‐tetracopper(II) dihydrate, [Cu₄(C₁₂H₁₂N₃O₄)₂Cl₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂]·2H₂O, consists of a neutral cyclic tetracopper(II) system having an embedded centre of inversion and two solvent water molecules. The coordination of each Cu^II atom is square‐pyramidal. The separations of Cu^II atoms bridged by cis‐N‐(2‐aminopropyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidate(3−) and carboxyl groups are 5.2096 (4) and 5.1961 (5) Å, respectively. A three‐dimensional supramolecular structure involving hydrogen bonding and aromatic stacking is observed.     

A highly efficient synthesis of (Z)‐1‐aryl‐2‐silyl‐1‐ stannylethenes and their conversion to (E)‐2‐ arylethenyl‐, (Z)‐2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethenyl‐ and allenyl‐silanes

A Pd(dba)₂–P(OEt)₃ combination allowed the silastannation of arylacetylenes, 1‐hexyne or propargyl alcohols with tributyl(trimethylsilyl)stannane to take place at room temperature, producing (Z)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannyl‐1‐substituted ethenes in high yields. Novel silyl(stannyl)ethenes were fully characterized by ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, ²⁹Si‐ and ¹¹⁹Sn‐NMR as well as infrared and mass analyses. Treatment of a series of (Z)‐1‐aryl‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethenes and (Z)‐1‐(3‐pyridyl)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene with hydrochloric acid or hydroiodic acid in the presence of tetraethylammonium chloride (TEACl) or tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) led to the exclusive formation of (E)‐trimethyl(2‐arylethenyl)silanes with high stereoselectivity. A similar reaction of (Z)‐1‐(2‐anisyl)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene also produced E‐type trimethyl[2‐(2‐anisyl)ethenyl]silane, while (Z)‐trimethyl [2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethenyl]silane was produced exclusively from (Z)‐1‐(2‐pyridyl)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene. Protodestannylation of (Z)‐1‐[hydroxy(phenyl)methyl]‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene with trifluoroacetic acid took place via the β‐elimination of hydroxystannane, providing trimethyl(3‐phenylpropa‐1,2‐dienyl)silane quite easily. The destannylation products were also fully characterized. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

catena‐Poly[tetra­kis(3‐phenyl­propyl­ammonium) [iodo­plumbate(II)‐tri‐μ‐iodo‐plumbate(II)‐tri‐μ‐iodo‐iodo­plumbate(II)‐di‐μ‐iodo]]

The title compound, {(C₉H₁₄N)₄[Pb₃I₁₀]}_n, crystallizes as an organic–inorganic hybrid. As such, the structure consists of a two‐dimensional inorganic layer of [Pb₃I₁₀]_n⁴ⁿ⁻ ions extending along [100]. The asymmetric unit contains two independent Pb atoms, viz. one in a general position and the other on an inversion centre. Each Pb atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by six iodide ions and exhibits both face‐ and corner‐sharing with adjacent atoms in the inorganic layer. These anionic layers alternate with 3‐phenyl­propyl­ammonium cations, which hydrogen bond to the iodides. Simple face‐to‐edge σ–π stacking inter­actions are observed between the aromatic rings that stabilize the overall three‐dimensional structure. This net structure has only been observed five times previously.