Efficient production of reference materials of hazardous organics using smart calibration by nuclear magnetic resonance

The accurate quantification of pesticide residues in food is an important factor in assuring the quality of life of our citizens. In general, chromatographic methods are used, which require certified reference materials (CRMs) for each analyte of interest for accurate quantitative analysis. Recently, regulation of pesticides in food, limiting the positive maximum residue (positive list system) has been brought into effect in Japan. Furthermore, ISO/IEC 17025 requires calibration and testing laboratories to program calibrations and measurements traceable to the International System of Units (SI). Accordingly, these laboratories need a suite of CRMs that are traceable to the SI. In order to address these requirements for every analyte of interest in an efficient manner, a new approach to producing SI traceable CRMs is required. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has been used widely in chemical analysis. One of the well known characteristics of NMR is the proportional relationship between peak area and the number of nuclei contributing to the peak. If accurate relative intensities of peak areas are obtained, this provides an attractive quantitative tool for organic compounds. The area of a signal from an analyte can be measured with respect to another signal originating from a comparator that has been added to the sample solution. The chosen comparator should not react with the analyte or resonate at any chemical shift similar to that of the analyte. This enables us to produce SI traceable CRMs more effectively. In this paper, we demonstrate a new approach for producing CRMs for pesticides using quantitative NMR??an SI traceable quantitative technique.     

A national traceability system for chemical measurements

Current developments in Germany for establishing a traceability system for chemical measurements are reported. The focus is on a dissemination mechanism which employs chemical calibration laboratories accredited within the framework of the German Calibration Service (DKD) and acting as "multipliers" between the national standards level and the user level by providing the user with calibration means which are traceable to the SI via national standards. At the national standards level, a network of high-level chemistry institutes coordinated by the national metrology institute, PTB, provides the primary references for chemical measurements.The use of the metrological dissemination system provided by the DKD also for chemical measurements is a logical extension of a traceability mechanism, successful for more than two decades in general metrology, to metrology in chemistry. In detail, traceability structures in clinical chemistry, electrochemistry, elemental analysis and gas analysis are described. This system has become an important part of the efforts made in Germany to support chemical laboratories in meeting the traceability requirements of the market and of legal regulations.     

Achieving traceability in chemical measurement—a metrological approach to proficiency testing

ISO/IEC 17025 requires that testing laboratories establish the traceability of their measurements, preferably to the SI units of measurement. The responsibility for establishing traceability lies with each individual laboratory and must be achieved by following a metrological approach.The results of measurements made in such a way are traceable to the standards used in method validation and to the calibration standards used during the measurement process. If these standards are traceable to SI then the measurements will also be traceable to SI.Participation in appropriate proficiency studies (an ISO/IEC 17025 requirement) enables laboratories to demonstrate the comparability of their measurements. If the materials used for the studies have traceable assigned values, then proficiency testing also provides information about measurement accuracy and confirms, or otherwise, that appropriate traceability has been established. This paper will report on a new approach for the establishment of traceable assigned values for chemical testing proficiency studies. The work is conducted at a "fit for purpose" level of measurement uncertainty, with costs contained at a level similar to previous "consensus" based proficiency studies. By establishing traceable assigned values in a cost effective way, NARL aims to demonstrate the added value of the metrological approach to participant laboratories.     

Metrological concept for comparable measurement results under the European water framework directive: demonstration of its applicability in elemental analysis

Within the scope of a project of the “European Association of National Metrology Institutes??(EURAMET), a European metrological dissemination system (network) providing traceable reference values assigned to matrix materials for validation purposes is described and put to the test. It enables testing laboratories (TL) to obtain comparable results for measurements under the “EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC??(WFD) and thus, to comply with a core requirement of this very directive. The dissemination system is characterized by the fact that it is available to all laboratories throughout Europe which intend to perform measurements in the context of the WFD and that it can ensure sustainable metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI) as a reference point for the measurement results. This dissemination system is set up in a hierarchical manner and links up the level of the national metrology institutes (NMI) with that of the TLs via an intermediate level of calibration laboratories (CL) by comparison measurements. The CLs are expert laboratories with respect to the measurement of the analytes considered here (within the project, the CLs are called potential calibration laboratories (PCL)) and are additionally involved in the organization of comparison measurements within the scope of regional quality assurance (QA) systems. Three comparison measurements have been performed to support the approach. A total of about 130 laboratories participated in this exercise with the focus on the measurement of the priority substances Pb, Cd, Hg, and Ni defined in the WFD. The elemental concentrations in the water samples roughly corresponded to one of the established environmental quality standards (EQS), the annual average concentration (AA-EQS), which is defined in the daughter Directive 2008/105/EC of the WFD. It turned out that a significant number of TLs still need to improve their measurement methods in order to be able to fulfill the minimum requirements of the WFD, in particular, with regard to the elements Cd and Hg probably due to their low EQS values. Furthermore, it became obvious that the hierarchical dissemination system suggested here actually corresponds to the measuring capabilities of the three participating groups (NMIs, PCLs, and TLs).     

Reference material requirements for laboratories and the role of accreditation bodies

It is now over two years since ISO/IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories was published. The standard places increased emphasis on the demonstration of traceability of measurements made by laboratories. In the areas of chemical and biological metrology, the introduction of this standard has brought new challenges for laboratories to grapple with. This paper will examine the requirements regarding traceability for chemical and biological measurements, with specific reference to the use of reference materials by laboratories. This will be explored from the perspective of both accreditation bodies and a laboratory which is both a user and producer of certified reference materials. Moreover, the paper will describe mechanisms that are being used to improve the use of reference materials by accredited laboratories and hence the traceability of measurements. Finally the role of accreditation programs for reference material producers in assisting with this aspect will be examined.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article if you access the article at . A link in the frame on the left on that page takes you directly to the supplementary material.Presented at BERM-9—Ninth International Symposium on Biological and Environmental Reference Materials, June 15–19, 2003 Berlin, Germany.     

Technical Factors of Quality Management in Gamma-Ray Spectrometry of Environmental Samples

The establishment of a quality management system is the best way to comply with international requirements concerning the achievement of confident and traceable analytical results. Some important points dealing with the technical factors of quality management in gamma-ray spectrometry of environmental samples are discussed. The experience obtained from analytical procedure validation is presented. Results of the application of standardized procedures to the analysis of ALMERA intercomparison samples, as well as the outcome of the utilization of certified reference materials for the quality control of measurement are presented. In fact, the implantation of simple technical principles reports reliable results and allows to elevate the quality of the measurements at a cost relatively low according to the real possibilities of the small laboratories, even in developing countries.     

A convenient and economic approach to achieve SI-traceable reference values to be used in drinking-water interlaboratory comparisons

Metrologically traceable reference values add an essential benefit to interlaboratory comparisons: unlike consensus values, they can be used to establish national and international comparability. Furthermore, the participating laboratories obtain a reliable and unbiased benchmark to check their results for accuracy. Usually, metrologically traceable reference values are obtained by so-called primary methods which demand excessive efforts at great expense. Within the framework of two national drinking-water interlaboratory comparisons (proficiency testing rounds), a new approach to provide metrologically traceable reference values was applied. It is solely based on existing data which were collected during the comparison itself. Lead (Pb) measurements serve as an example to show how metrologically traceable reference values were derived from the lead amount added during sample preparation and the amount of lead already present in the drinking-water matrix used to prepare these samples. Within this approach, the matrix content is calculated in a way similar to a standard addition experiment. An uncertainty budget for the reference value was set up which describes the link to the corresponding SI units. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) as a primary method was used to validate this approach in the case of cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, and nickel.     

"Demonstration" vs. "designation" of measurement competence: the need to link accreditation to metrology

Formal acceptance of the results of chemical laboratories is increasingly organized through a) accreditation of measuring laboratories nationally and b) mutual recognition of accreditation internationally (through formal Multilateral Recognition Agreements, MRAs). However, real comparability of results of measurements is realized by using common (internationally agreed) measurement scales which make these results traceable to this scale, i.e. "traceable" to the same (internationally agreed) value of the unit of that scale. In addition, the criterion against which the evaluation is done, should be "external" to the measurement laboratories which are being evaluated. This is realized in IRMM's International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) where evaluation is performed against values which are anchored using "metrology", the science of measurement with its own rules, which offers a sound foundation for measurement in all scientific disciplines. It is argued in this paper that the demonstration of measurement capability against values on such scales provides a result-oriented rather than a procedure-oriented evaluation. Thus, competence can be "demonstrated" rather than just "designated" and this can be shown to both customers and regulators. It inspires more confidence.     

Contribution to the certification of B,Cd, Cu,Mg and Pb in a synthetic water sample,by use of isotope-dilution ICP-MS,for Comparison 12 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme

The contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of the B, Cd, Cu, Mg, and Pb content of a synthetic water sample used in Comparison 12 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) is described. The aim of the IMEP programme is to demonstrate objectively the degree of equivalence and quality of chemical measurements of individual laboratories on the international scene by comparing them with reference ranges traceable to the SI (Système International d'Unités). IMEP is organized in support of European Union policies and helps to improve the traceability of values produced by field chemical measurement laboratories. The analytical procedure used to establish the reference values for the B, Cd, Cu, Mg, and Pb content of the IMEP-12 sample is based on inductively coupled plasma-isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ICP-IDMS) applied as a primary method of measurement. The measurements performed for the IMEP-12 study are described in detail. Focus is on the element boron, which is particularly difficult to analyze by ICP-MS because of potential problems of low sensitivity, high mass discrimination, memory effects, and abundance sensitivity. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and Eurachem guidelines. For all investigated elements with concentrations in the low micro g kg(-1) and mg kg(-1) range (corresponding to pmol kg(-1) to the high micro mol kg(-1) level), SI-traceable reference values with relative expanded uncertainties ( k=2) of less than 2 % were obtained.     

Ion chromatographic precision measurement procedure for electrolytes in human serum: validation with the aid of primary measurement procedures

In order to make analytical measurement results traceable to the SI units in the field of clinical chemistry, an ion chromatographic (IC) measurement procedure has been developed which allows the amount of substance of the four so-called electrolytes Na, K, Mg and Ca as well as that of Li to be determined efficiently in human serum and with high accuracy. The IC measurement procedure was validated using primary measurement procedures confirmed by international comparison measurements and is proposed for use as a transfer standard when comparing measurements with clinical reference laboratories. The solutions used for calibration were gravimetrically prepared from pure substances (salts). Their chemical compositions had been iteratively fitted to those of the samples. The serum samples were mineralized by microwave-assisted digestion. The following relative expanded uncertainties for the average elemental contents were obtained: Li 0.4%, Na 0.14%, K 0.6%, Mg 0.8% and Ca 0.4%.     

Establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges for the content of various elements in the IMEP-9 water sample

 The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) attempts to shed light on the current state of the practice in chemical measurements. The main tool, which assists this attempt and also differentiates IMEP from similar projects, is the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges (where possible) for the elements offered for measurement to the participants for every IMEP round. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), as the founder and co-ordinator of IMEP has the responsibility of establishing the SI-traceable reference ranges. This is a large task that requires knowledge, skill and resources. IRMM collaborates with a network of reference laboratories in order to achieve the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges in a transparent and reliable way. The IMEP reference laboratories must have demonstrated experience and have a proven and successful record in the use of primary methods of measurements (mainly isotope dilution mass spectrometry) and the application of uncertainty evaluation according to ISO/BIPM guidelines. In IMEP-9 "trace elements in water", results from 7 reference laboratories (including IRMM) were combined by IRMM to establish SI-traceable ranges for the 15 elements, which were then offered for measurement to the 200 participants worldwide. This paper does not discuss the individual contribution of the reference laboratories (this could be the subject of individual papers) but describes the procedures and criteria used in order to establish the reference ranges for the IMEP-9 samples by combining the individual contributions. All results submitted to IRMM are included, so as to make this publication as realistic as possible. Received: 31 December 1999 / Accepted: 7 March 2000     

Ion chromatographic precision measurement procedure for electrolytes in human serum: validation with the aid of primary measurement procedures

In order to make analytical measurement results traceable to the SI units in the field of clinical chemistry, an ion chromatographic (IC) measurement procedure has been developed which allows the amount of substance of the four so-called electrolytes Na, K, Mg and Ca as well as that of Li to be determined efficiently in human serum and with high accuracy. The IC measurement procedure was validated using primary measurement procedures confirmed by international comparison measurements and is proposed for use as a transfer standard when comparing measurements with clinical reference laboratories. The solutions used for calibration were gravimetrically prepared from pure substances (salts). Their chemical compositions had been iteratively fitted to those of the samples. The serum samples were mineralized by microwave-assisted digestion. The following relative expanded uncertainties for the average elemental contents were obtained: Li 0.4%, Na 0.14%, K 0.6%, Mg 0.8% and Ca 0.4%.

     

Comparability and recognition of chemical measurement results – an international goal

As a consequence of the globalisation of trade and industry and other human activities, reliability of and confidence in measurement results is increasingly required, also in the field of chemical analysis, so that measurements made in one country will be accepted in other countries without the necessity to repeat them. The prerequisite for confidence is comparability on the basis of known uncertainties which in turn are based on traceability to recognised references. Traceability structures for chemical measurements are required which, by providing calibration means traceable to national standards, allow uncertainty statements to be made at field level, thus establishing comparability. Such traceability structures are now being developed in all industrialised countries. To ensure international comparability, mutual recognition of the national activities in metrology in chemistry is required in addition. The Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) for national measurement standards and calibration certificates issued by national metrology institutes, which is currently under way within the framework of the Metre Convention, aimes at providing the necessary international confidence for all kinds of measurements. The field of chemical analysis is included in the international metrological infrastructure through the new Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM). Carefully selected key comparison measurements, which cover the most important areas where traceability is required, and which are carried out by national metrology institutes in cooperation with other national institutes entrusted with the provision of part of the national references for chemical measurements, form the basis for declarations of equivalence under the MRA. The results of the first key comparisons and studies carried out so far clearly show that the group of laboratories involved in the key comparisons is capable of establishing the international references (key comparison reference values) for chemical measurements with sufficient accuracy, also in complicated matrices.     

“Demonstration” vs. “designation” of measurement competence: the need to link accreditation to metrology

Formal acceptance of the results of chemical laboratories is increasingly organized through a) accreditation of measuring laboratories nationally and b) mutual recognition of accreditation internationally (through formal Multilateral Recognition Agreements, MRAs). However, real comparability of results of measurements is realized by using common (internationally agreed) measurement scales which make these results traceable to this scale, i.e. “traceable” to the same (internationally agreed) value of the unit of that scale. In addition, the criterion against which the evaluation is done, should be “external” to the measurement laboratories which are being evaluated. This is realized in IRMM’s International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) where evaluation is performed against values which are anchored using “metrology”, the science of measurement with its own rules, which offers a sound foundation for measurement in all scientific disciplines. It is argued in this paper that the demonstration of measurement capability against values on such scales provides a result-oriented rather than a procedure-oriented evaluation. Thus, competence can be “demonstrated” rather than just “designated” and this can be shown to both customers and regulators. It inspires more confidence.     

The IRMM – International Measurement Evaluation Programme,IMEP

 The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of the state-of-the-practice (SoP) of chemical measurements in field laboratories by comparing them to a reference range that contains a value that is as traceable to the SI system of measurements (in this case to the Avogadro Constant, one of the best realizations of the mole so far), as can presently be achieved, but which in any case is independent of human or political decision. Thus, a large-scale field test has been made to realize (international) comparability of these measurements by providing them with an independent scientific common basis. In the third measurement round, IMEP-3, ten trace elements, B, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Pb, Rb and Zn were measured in a synthetic and in a natural water by about 155 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values, established by IRMM and NIST, using isotope specific methods (isotope dilution mass spectrometry and neutron activation analysis), wherever possible. One of these methods (IDMS) has recently been defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance (Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière: CCQM) in its founding meeting in April 1995 at BIPM, Paris. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference range, although the declared accuracy was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between a self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality. There is little reduction in the spread of the measurements if the results obtained for one element in the natural water B are divided by the results obtained for the same element in the synthetic water A (which was unknowingly, a reference material). Index entries International measurement evaluation programme (IMEP).     

Traceable measurements in clinical laboratories

 Reliable, traceable and comparable measurements provide the rational basis for evaluation of the quality of a result and the starting point for recognized laboratory accreditation in any national area. Modern medical diagnostics and treatment involve rapidly rising numbers and types of clinical laboratory measurements, that are reliable. Therefore, the basic principles to be followed to assure the traceability of clinical measurements as required by the Romanian Laws of Metrology are reviewed. Main sources affecting the quality of the unbroken chain of calibrations that relate the measurements back to appropriate measurement standards are discussed. Examples of how to achieve traceable measurements in clinical laboratories are presented. Details of specific uses of reference materials, measuring instruments and standard measurement methods are also discussed. Received: 8 January 1998 · Accepted: 21 April 1998     

Traceable reference values for routine drinking water proficiency testing: first experiences

Proficiency testing (PT) results have been used to improve traceability in chemical drinking water analysis. With a generalized least-square regression the mass concentrations of As and Sb were calculated in a drinking water that had been used to prepare proficiency testing samples by a spiking procedure. From the mass concentrations in the matrix and the spiked amounts, reference values with an uncertainty budget could be calculated without the need for reference measurements. The degree to which these reference values can be regarded as traceable is discussed. The results showed slight deviations in some samples between reference values and consensus means.     

Reference materials in the Russian system of accreditation of analytical laboratories

 This article is devoted to the role of reference materials (RMs) in chemical analysis and their main applications in analytical laboratories. The principal requirements of the RMs used in accredited laboratories in the Russian Analytical Laboratories Accreditation System (SAAL) are presented. These include the basic regulatory and metrological requirements of RMs. Finally, a review of the provision of RMs used for the analytical control of various test objects is presented. Received: 9 August 1998 / Accepted: 9 November 1998     

Preparation of a reference material “Creatinine in Human Urine”

Two batches of a reference material “Creatinine in Human Urine” have been prepared with creatinine concentrations at the physiological level, and used in interlaboratory comparisons in which up to 26 laboratories participated employing up to 4 independent methods. The 95% confidence intervals obtained for the certified creatinine concentrations are better than the “acceptable ranges” of commercially control samples available for clinical laboratories, the certified values being traceable to mean values of the commercial control samples. Thus, a suitable reference material has been prepared for the quality assurance of environmental and occupational health studies in which the concentration of a pollutant or its metabolites in human urine has to be related to the creatinine concentration.