The number of transversals in a Latin square

A Latin Square of order n is an n × n array of n symbols, in which each symbol occurs exactly once in each row and column. A transversal is a set of n entries, one selected from each row and each column of a Latin Square of order n such that no two entries contain the same symbol. Define T(n) to be the maximum number of transversals over all Latin squares of order n. We show that for n ≥ 5, where b ≈ 1.719 and c ≈ 0.614. A corollary of this result is an upper bound on the number of placements of n non-attacking queens on an n × n toroidal chess board. Some divisibility properties of the number of transversals in Latin squares based on finite groups are established. We also provide data from a computer enumeration of transversals in all Latin Squares of order at most 9, all groups of order at most 23 and all possible turn-squares of order 14.     

Partial Latin Squares Are Avoidable

A square array is avoidable if for each set of n symbols there is an n × n Latin square on these symbols which differs from the array in every cell. The main result of this paper is that for m ≥ 2 any partial Latin square of order 4m − 1 is avoidable, thus concluding the proof that any partial Latin square of order at least 4 is avoidable.     

Covering Arrays of Strength Three

A covering array of size N, degree k, order v and strength t is a k × N array with entries from a set of v symbols such that in any t × N subarray every t × 1 column occurs at least once. Covering arrays have been studied for their applications to drug screening and software testing. We present explicit constructions and give constructive upper bounds for the size of a covering array of strength three.     

A determinantal version of the frobenius-könig theorem

Let F be a field and let {d ₁,…,d_k } be a set of independent indeterminates over F. Let A(d ₁,…,d_k ) be an n × n matrix each of whose entries is an element of F or a sum of an element of F and one of the indeterminates in {d ₁,…,d_k }. We assume that no d ¹ appears twice in A(d ₁,…,d_k ). We show that if det A(d ₁,…,d_k ) = 0 then A(d ₁,…,d_k ) must contain an r × s submatrix B, with entries in F, so that r + s = n + p and rank B ? p ? 1: for some positive integer p.     

Latin squares and superqueens

Let L be a Latin square of order n with entries from {0, 1,…, n ? 1}. In addition, L is said to have the (n, k) property if, in each right or left wrap around diagonal, the number of cells with entries smaller than k is exactly k. It is established that a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Latin squares having the (n, k) property is that of (2|n ? 2| k) and (3|n ? 3| k). Also, these Latin squares are related to a problem of placing nonattacking queens on a toroidal chessboard.     

A relationship between stochastic matrices and eigenvalues of products

Let {B₁,…,B_n} be a set of n rank one n×n row stochastic matrices. The next two statements are equivalent: (1) If A is an n×n nonnegative matrix, then 1 is an eigenvalue ofB_kA for each k=1,…,n if and only if A is row stochastic. (2) The n×n row stochastic matrix S whose kth row is a row of B_k for k=1,…,n is nonsingular. For any set {B₁, B₂,…, B_p} of fewer than n row stochastic matrices of order n×n and of any rank, there exists a nonnegative n×n matrix A which is not row stochastic such that 1 is eigenvalue of every B_kA, k=1,…,p.     

Explicit constructions for perfect hash families

Let k, v, t be integers such that k ≥ v ≥ t ≥ 2. A perfect hash family (N; k, v, t) can be defined as an N × k array with entries from a set of v symbols such that every N × t subarray contains at least one row having distinct symbols. Perfect hash families have been studied by over 20 years and they find a wide range of applications in computer sciences and in cryptography. In this paper we focus on explicit constructions for perfect hash families using combinatorial methods. We present many recursive constructions which result in a large number of improved parameters for perfect hash families. The paper also includes extensive tables for parameters with t = 3, 4, 5, 6 of newly constructed perfect hash families.      

On avoiding odd partial Latin squares and r-multi Latin squares

We show that for any positive integer k?4, if R is a (2k-1)×(2k-1) partial Latin square, then R is avoidable given that R contains an empty row, thus extending a theorem of Chetwynd and Rhodes. We also present the idea of avoidability in the setting of partial r-multi Latin squares, and give some partial fillings which are avoidable. In particular, we show that if R contains at most nr/2 symbols and if there is an n×n Latin square L such that δn of the symbols in L cover the filled cells in R where 0<δ<1, then R is avoidable provided r is large enough.     

Group construction of covering arrays

A covering array t‐CA (n, k, g) is a k × n array on a set of g symbols with the property that in each t × n subarray, every t × 1 column appears at least once. This paper improves many of the best known upper bounds on n for covering arrays, 2‐CA (n, k, g) with g + 1 ≤ k ≤ 2g, for g = 3 · · · 12 by a construction which in many of these cases produces a 2‐CA (n, k, g) with n = k (g ? 1) + 1. The construction is an extension of an algebraic method used by Chateauneuf, Colbourn, and Kreher which uses an array and a group action on the array. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 13: 70–77, 2005.     

Bachelor latin squares with large indivisible plexes

In a latin square of order n , a k ‐plex is a selection of kn entries in which each row, column, and symbol occurs k times. A 1 ‐plex is also called a transversal. A k ‐plex is indivisible if it contains no c ‐plex for 0 < c < k . We prove that, for all n ≥ 4 , there exists a latin square of order n that can be partitioned into an indivisible ? n / 2 ?‐plex and a disjoint indivisible ? n / 2 ?‐plex. For all n ≥ 3 , we prove that there exists a latin square of order n with two disjoint indivisible ? n / 2 ?‐plexes. We also give a short new proof that, for all odd n ≥ 5 , there exists a latin square of order n with at least one entry not in any transversal. Such latin squares have no orthogonal mate. Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 19:304‐312, 2011     

Constructions of covering arrays of strength five

A covering array of size N, strength t, degree k and order v, or a CA(N; t, k, v) in short, is an N × k array on v symbols. In every N × t subarray, each t-tuple occurs in at least one row. Covering arrays have been studied for their significant applications to generating software test suites to cover all t-sets of component interactions. In this paper, we present two constructive methods to obtain covering arrays of strength 5 by using difference covering arrays and holey difference matrices with a prescribed property. As a consequence, some new upper bounds on the covering numbers are derived.     

Multi-latin squares

A multi-latin square of order n and index k is an n×n array of multisets, each of cardinality k, such that each symbol from a fixed set of size n occurs k times in each row and k times in each column. A multi-latin square of index k is also referred to as a k-latin square. A 1-latin square is equivalent to a latin square, so a multi-latin square can be thought of as a generalization of a latin square.In this note we show that any partially filled-in k-latin square of order m embeds in a k-latin square of order n, for each n≥2m, thus generalizing Evans’ Theorem. Exploiting this result, we show that there exist non-separable k-latin squares of order n for each n≥k+2. We also show that for each n≥1, there exists some finite value g(n) such that for all k≥g(n), every k-latin square of order n is separable.We discuss the connection between k-latin squares and related combinatorial objects such as orthogonal arrays, latin parallelepipeds, semi-latin squares and k-latin trades. We also enumerate and classify k-latin squares of small orders.     

Power-Central Elements in Tensor Products of Symbol Algebras

Let A be a central simple algebra over a field F. Let k₁,…, k_r be cyclic extensions of F such that k₁ ?_F… ?_Fk_r is a field. We investigate conditions under which A is a tensor product of symbol algebras where each field k_i lies in a symbol F-algebra factor of the same degree as k_i over F. As an application, we give an example of an indecomposable algebra of degree 8 and exponent 2 over a field of 2-cohomological dimension 4.     

Latin squares with no small odd plexes

A k‐plex in a Latin square of order n is a selection of kn entries in which each row, column, and symbol is represented precisely k times. A transversal of a Latin square corresponds to the case k = 1. We show that for all even n > 2 there exists a Latin square of order n which has no k‐plex for any odd but does have a k‐plex for every other . © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 16: 477–492, 2008     

Monotonicity of permanents of direct sums of doubly stochastic matrices

Let Ωn be the set of all n × n doubly stochastic matrices, let J_n be the n × n matrix all of whose entries are 1/n and let σ _k (A) denote the sum of the permanent of all k × k submatrices of A. It has been conjectured that if A ε Ω _n and A ≠ J_J then g_A,k (θ) ? σ _k ((1 θ)J_n 1 θA) is strictly increasing on [0,1] for k = 2,3,…,n. We show that if A = A ₁ ⊕ ⊕A_t (t ≥ 2) is an n × n matrix where A_i for i = 1,2, …,t, and if for each i g_Ai,ki (θ) is non-decreasing on [0.1] for k_t = 2,3,…,n_i , then g_A,k (θ) is strictly increasing on [0,1] for k = 2,3,…,n.     

Extending subpermutation matrices in regular classes of matrices

We determine precise conditions in order that every n × n matrix of 0's and 1's with exactly k 1's in each row and column has the property that each subpermutation matrix of rank d can be extended to a permutation matrix. An application is given to completing partial latin squares.     

Roux-type constructions for covering arrays of strengths three and four

A covering array CA(N;t,k,v) is an N × k array such that every N × t sub-array contains all t-tuples from v symbols at least once, where t is the strength of the array. Covering arrays are used to generate software test suites to cover all t-sets of component interactions. Recursive constructions for covering arrays of strengths 3 and 4 are developed, generalizing many “Roux-type” constructions. A numerical comparison with current construction techniques is given through existence tables for covering arrays.      

Binary consecutive covering arrays

A k × n array with entries from a q-letter alphabet is called a t-covering array if each t × n submatrix contains amongst its columns each one of the q ^t different words of length t that can be produced by the q letters. In the present article we use a probabilistic approach based on an appropriate Markov chain embedding technique, to study a t-covering problem where, instead of looking at all possible t × n submatrices, we consider only submatrices of dimension t × n with its rows being consecutive rows of the original k × n array. Moreover, an exact formula is established for the probability distribution function of the random variable, which enumerates the number of deficient submatrices (i.e., submatrices with at least one missing word, amongst their columns), in the case of a k × n binary matrix (q = 2) obtained by realizing kn Bernoulli variables.     

Transversals in Latin Arrays with Many Distinct Symbols

An array is row‐Latin if no symbol is repeated within any row. An array is Latin if it and its transpose are both row‐Latin. A transversal in an array is a selection of n different symbols from different rows and different columns. We prove that every Latin array containing at least distinct symbols has a transversal. Also, every row‐Latin array containing at least distinct symbols has a transversal. Finally, we show by computation that every Latin array of order 7 has a transversal, and we describe all smaller Latin arrays that have no transversal.