Morphology of PC/SAN blends: effect of reactive compatibilization,SAN concentration,processing, and viscosity ratio

This article examines the effects of dispersed phase concentration, processing apparatus, viscosity ratio, and interfacial compatibilization using an SAN–amine compatibilizer on the morphology of blends of bisphenol A–polycarbonate (PC) with styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers. For uncompatibilized blends, the dispersed phase particle size increased significantly with SAN concentration, and was found to exhibit a minimum at a viscosity ratio of approximately 0.35 for a fixed concentration of 30% SAN in the blend. Although the morphology of uncompatibilized PC/SAN blends mixed in a Brabender mixer, single‐ and twin‐screw extruders were quite similar, the twin‐screw extruder produced significantly finer morphologies in blends containing SAN–amine. The average particle size for blends compatibilized with the SAN–amine polymer was approximately half that of uncompatibilized blends and was relatively independent of viscosity ratio and dispersed phase composition. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 71–82, 1999     

The relative role of coalescence and interfacial tension in controlling dispersed phase size reduction during the compatibilization of polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene blends

The breaking thread and the sessile drop methods have been used to evaluate the interfacial tension between a polypropylene (PP) and a polyethylene-terephthalate (PET). An excellent correlation was found between the two. The breaking thread technique was then used to evaluate the interfacial tension of these blends at various levels of a styrene-ethylene butylene-styrene grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MA) compatibilizer. In order to evaluate the relative roles of coalescence and interfacial tension in controlling dispersed phase size reduction during compatibilization, the morphology of PP/PET 1/99 and 10/90 blends compatibilized by a SEBS-g-MA were studied and compared. The samples were prepared in a Brabender mixer. For the 10/90 blend, the addition of the compatibilizer leads to a typical emulsification curve, and a decrease in dispersed phase size of 3.4 times is observed. For the 1/99 blend, a 1.7 times reduction in particle size is observed. In the latter case, this decrease can only be attributed to the decrease of the interfacial tension. It is evident from these results that the drop in particle size for the 10/90 PP/PET blend after compatibilization is almost equally due to diminished coalescence and interfacial tension reduction. These results were corroborated with the interfacial tension data in the presence of the copolymer. A direct relationship between the drop in dispersed phase size for the 1/99 PP/PET blend and the interfacial tension reduction was found for this predominantly shear mixing device. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35 : 2271–2280, 1997     

Blends of bisphenol-A polycarbonate and acrylic polymers: II. PC/acrylic copolymers as a new route for compatibilization

An acrylic polymer containing acid and anhydride units, referred to as reactive polyglutarimide (RPGI), has been used to react with PC. The reaction has been previously determined as an acidolysis of the carbonate bond which breaks the PC chain in two parts. One of those two parts remains free while the other one is grafted on the acrylic backbone. We have found that the anhydride units could also react with the carbonate bonds. In this case the PC macromolecule would also be broken in two parts, which would, however, both be grafted on the acrylic backbone. The reaction has been performed in solution in order to keep good contact between the reacting units. The influence of temperature and concentration on the grafting ratio has been studied. The best experimental conditions were determined in order to obtain a grafted copolymer where the acrylic backbone only supports, on the average, one PC side chain through acid reaction or two PC chains through anhydride reaction. Indeed, these two types of reactions could not be isolated. The efficiency of this copolymer as emulsifier has been studied in solution cast blends as well as in melt mixed blends. The copolymer strongly affects the microstructure in solution cast blends where films containing 30 wt % of PC have become transparent. However, the dispersed phase size of solvent cast blends could be highly influenced by the casting conditions related to solvent trapping. In melt mixed samples, the copolymer also reduces significantly the dispersed phase size, but no transparent blends have been observed so far. These results were compared with those given in the literature describing the efficiency of a synthesized copolymer which has a more complicated structure. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35: 735–747, 1997     

Phase separation in semicrystalline blends of poly(phenylene sulfide) and poly(ethylene terephthalate). II. Effect of poly(phenylene sulfide) homopolymer solubilization of PPS‐graft‐PET copolymer on morphology and crystallization behavior

The morphology and crystallization behavior of poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends compatibilized with graft copolymers were investigated. PPS‐blend‐PET compositions were prepared in which the viscosity of the PPS phase was varied to assess the morphological implications. The dispersed‐phase particle size was influenced by the combined effects of the ratio of dispersed‐phase viscosity to continuous‐phase viscosity and reduced interfacial tension due to the addition of PPS‐graft‐PET copolymers to the blends. In the absence of graft copolymer, the finest dispersion of PET in a continuous phase of PPS was achieved when the viscosity ratio between blend components was nearly equal. As expected, PET particle sizes increased as the viscosity ratio diverged from unity. When graft copolymers were added to the blends, fine dispersions of PET were achieved despite large differences in the viscosities of PPS and PET homopolymers. The interfacial activity of the PPS‐graft‐PET copolymer appeared to be related to the molecular weight ratio of the PPS homopolymer to the PPS segment of the graft copolymer (M_H/M_A). With increasing solubilization of the PPS graft copolymer segment by the PPS homopolymer, the particle size of the PET dispersed phase decreased. In crystallization studies, the presence of the PPS phase increased the crystallization temperature of PET. The magnitude of the increase in the PET crystallization temperature coincided with the viscosity ratio and extent of the PPS homopolymer solubilization in the graft copolymer. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 599–610, 2000     

The role of interfacial modifier in toughening of nylon 6 with a core‐shell toughener

The effects of nylon 6 matrix viscosity and a multifunctional epoxy interfacial modifier on the notched impact strength of the blends of nylon 6 with a maleic anhydride modified polyethylene‐octene elastomer/semi‐crystalline polyolefin blend (TPEg) were studied by means of morphological observation, and mechanical and rheological tests. Because the viscosity of the TPEg is much higher than that of nylon 6, an increase in the viscosity of nylon 6 reduces the viscosity mismatch between the dispersed phase and the matrix, and increases notched impact strength of the blends. Moreover, addition of 0.3 to 0.9 phr of the interfacial modifier leads to a finer dispersion of the TPEg and greatly improves the notched impact strength of the nylon 6/TPEg blends. This is because the multi‐epoxy interfacial modifier can react with nylon 6 and the maleated TPEg. The reaction with nylon 6 increases the viscosity of the matrix while the coupling reaction at the interface between nylon 6 and the maleated TPEg leads to better compatibilization. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 2664–2672, 1999     

Effect of PBT molecular weight and reactive compatibilization on the dispersed‐phase coalescence of PBT/SAN blends

Poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/styrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN) blends were investigated with respect to their phase morphology. The SAN component was kept as dispersed phase and PBT as matrix phase and the PBT/SAN viscosity ratio was changed by using different PBT molecular weights. PBT/SAN blends were also compatibilized by adding methyl methacrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐ethyl acrylate terpolymer, MGE, which is an in situ reactive compatibilizer for melt blending. In noncompatibilized blends, the dispersed phase particle size increased with SAN concentration due to coalescence effects. Static coalescence experiments showed evidence of greater coalescence in blends with higher viscosity ratios. For noncompatibilized PBT/SAN/MGE blends with high molecular weight PBT as matrix phase, the average particle size of SAN phase does not depend on the SAN concentration in the blends. However noncompatibilized blends with low molecular weight PBT showed a significant increase in SAN particle size with the SAN concentration. The effect of MGE epoxy content and MGE molecular weight on the morphology of the PBT/SAN blend was also investigated. As the MGE epoxy content increased, the average particle size of SAN initially decreased with both high and low molecular weight PBT phase, thereafter leveling off with a critical content of epoxy groups in the blend. This critical content was higher in the blends containing low molecular weight PBT than in those with high molecular weight PBT. At a fixed MGE epoxy content, a decrease in MGE molecular weight yielded PBT/SAN blends with dispersed nanoparticles with an average size of about 40 nm. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys, 2010     

Reactive compatibilization of PA12/plasticized starch blends: Towards improved mechanical properties

Glycerol-plasticized starch (TPS)/polyamide 12 (PA12) blends were processed by melt mixing using two types of interfacial agent, i.e. diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A and a poly(ethylene-co-butyl acrylate-co-maleic anhydride) copolymer. Morphologies of the blends were tailored from the nature and amount of the interfacial agents. The average size of the dispersed phase was shown to decrease with the incorporation of the reactive agents and was proved to respect models, usually employed for conventional blends, for size predictions of the dispersed phase. By means of rheological experiments, it has been investigated whether the size reduction of the dispersed phase was coming from the compatibilization of the blend or from the viscosity changes due to chain extension in the matrix. The influence of the coupling agents on the viscoelastic behavior of the blend was characterized. Both interfacial agents led to increase the absolute complex viscosity but in the case of diepoxy reactive agent, the Newtonian flow behavior of complex viscosity totally disappeared in the low-frequency region. Mechanical properties of the TPS/PA12 blends were characterized and were proved to be strongly impacted by the use of interfacial agents. Elongation at break was enhanced as a consequence of a better adhesion between the matrix and the dispersed phase, whereas a decrease of the Young’s modulus was observed with increasing DGEBA content. Polyamide 12 crystallization in TPS/PA12 blends was found to be strongly dependent on DGEBA content while the introduction of maleic anhydride-grafted copolymer had no influence.     

The influence of partial emulsification on coalescence suppression and interfacial tension reduction in PP/PET blends

This study examines how the relative role of coalescence suppression and interfacial tension reduction influence the particle size at various levels of in situ compatibilization. The polymers studied are polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as matrix and a polypropylene (PP) as dispersed phase compatibilized by a triblock copolymer of poly(styrene–hydrogenated butadiene–styrene) (SEBS) grafted with maleic anhydride. The interfacial tension was studied by the breaking‐thread method, and it was used along with the morphology to characterize the emulsification efficacy of the copolymers. By modifying the concentration of MA grafted on the SEBS, different levels of emulsification of the blends were obtained. A comparison of 1/99 and 10/90 PP/PET blends compatibilized by SEBS‐g‐MA allows one to distinguish the relative role of interfacial tension and coalescence suppression in diminishing particle size. It is shown that varying degrees of residual coalescence remain, depending on the level of %MA in the copolymer. A detailed study of the 2%MA system below interfacial saturation was carried out to shed further light on the dependence of coalescence suppression on emulsification level and interfacial coverage. After separating out the contribution of interfacial tension on particle size reduction, it is shown that coalescence suppression for this system increases gradually with areal density of modifier at the interface right up to the region of interfacial saturation. Finally, the interfacial and morphological data were used to test the ability of the Lee and Park model to describe coalescence in polymer blends. Reasonable agreement was found between the parameter c₁, describing the coalescence in that model, and the trends related to residual coalescence from this study. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 939–951, 1999     

Viscoelastic interfacial properties of compatibilized poly(ε‐caprolactone)/polylactide blend

Poly(ε‐caprolactone)/polylactide blend (PCL/PLA) is an interesting biomaterial because the two component polymers show good complementarity in their physical properties. However, PCL and PLA are incompatible thermodynamically and hence the interfacial properties act as the important roles controlling the final properties of their blends. Thus, in this work, the PCL/PLA blends were prepared by melt mixing using the block copolymers as compatibilizer for the studies of interfacial properties. Several rheological methods and viscoelastic models were used to establish the relations between improved phase morphologies and interfacial properties. The results show that the interfacial behaviors of the PCL/PLA blends highly depend on the interface‐located copolymers. The presence of copolymers reduces the interfacial tension and emulsified the phase interface, leading to stabilization of the interface and retarding both the shape relaxation and the elastic interface relaxation. As a result, besides the relaxation of matrices (τ_m) and the shape relaxation of the dispersed PLA phase (τ_F), a new relaxation behavior (τ_β), which is attribute to the relaxation of Marangoni stresses tangential to the interface between dispersed PLA phase and matrix PCL, is observed on the compatibilized blends. In contrast to that of the diblock copolymers, the triblock copolymers show higher emulsifying level. However, both can improve the overall interfacial properties and enhance the mechanical strength of the PCL/PLA blends as a result. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 756–765, 2010     

Effects of the copolymer microstructure on the morphology of polyethylene–poly(ethylene‐co‐α‐olefin) blends

The effects of the copolymer microstructure on the morphology evolution in polyethylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐α‐olefin) blends were investigated. Microscopy revealed that the melt‐phase morphology, inferred from the solid‐state morphologies of annealed and quenched samples, was strongly affected by the copolymer structure, that is, the branch content and branch length. Higher molecular weight α‐olefin comonomer residues and residue contents in the copolymers led to faster coarsening of the morphology. The molecular weight of the polyethylene and the copolymers affected the coarsening rates of the morphology, principally through its influence on the melt viscosity. The effects of the molecular weight were largely explained by the normalization of the coarsening rate data with respect to the thermal energy and zero‐shear‐rate viscosity. Thus, the effect of the molecular weight on the compatibility of the blends was much smaller than the effects of the branch length and branch number. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 965–973, 2004     

Improving the impact property and heat‐resistance of PLA/PC blends through coupling molecular chains at the interface

The influences of both the molecular structure and the melt viscosity differences between Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and polycarbonate (PC) on the interpenetration of molecular chains at the interface were investigated by comparing the dynamic mechanical properties and morphologies of the as‐prepared PLA/PC solution‐casting blends with those of their corresponding annealed (180°C, 8 h) samples or PLA/PC melt blends. Additionally, two chain extenders containing epoxy groups (ADR and TGDDM) were used to improve the interfacial strength. Subsequently, the interpenetration of PLA and PC molecular chains at the interface was also surveyed. Finally, the effects of the morphology formed by after adding ADR or TGDDM on the impact property, and heat resistance were discussed. The results showed that there was no interpenetration of molecular chains at the interface in PLA/PC melt blends because of the serious hindrance of the molecular structure and the melt viscosity differences. Although the interfacial strength achieved significant increase after adding ADR or TGDDM, the increase of the interfacial strength should be caused by the connection of ADR or TGDDM molecules with PLA and PC molecules at the interface through chemical bonds rather than the entanglements of PLA and PC molecular chains because of no interpenetration of PLA and PC molecular chains at the interface. Thus, the morphology formed after adding ADR or TGDDM is still the type of complete phase separation, which may be the most suitable morphology for achieving high impact and heat resistance PLA/PC blends because these two properties strongly depend on the crystallinity of PLA phase. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Viscoelastic properties and interfacial tension of polystyrene–polyethylene blends

The linear viscoelastic properties of polystyrene polyethylene (PS/PE) blends have been investigated in the molten state. For concentrations of the dispersed phase equal to 30 vol %, the blends exhibited a droplet‐matrix morphology with a volume‐average diameter of 5.5 μm for a 70/30 PS/PE blend at 200 °C and 14.7 μm for a 30/70 PS/PE blend at 230 °C. Enhanced elasticity (G′) for both blends, in the terminal zone, compared to the modulus of the matrix (PS and PE, respectively) was observed. This is related to the deformation of the droplets in the matrix phase and hence to the interfacial forces between the blend components. The results for these uncompatibilized blends are shown to be in agreement with the predictions of the emulsion model of Palierne. These predictions were used to obtain the interfacial tension between PS and PE, which was found to be between 2 and 5 mN/m at 200 °C and 4 ± 1 mN/m at 230 °C. Independent interfacial tension measurements using the breaking‐thread method resulted in a value of 4.7 mN/m and 4.1 mN/m at 200 °C and 230 °C for the respective blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 1359–1368, 2000     

Can random copolymers serve as effective polymeric compatibilizers?

We investigate the compatibilizing performance of a random copolymer in the melt state, using transmission electron microscopy. Blends of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) are chosen as a model system, and a random copolymer of styrene and methyl methacrylate (SMMA) with 70 wt % styrene is used as a compatibilizer. From TEM photographs it is clear that SMMA moves to the interface between PS and PMMA domains during melt mixing, and forms encapsulating layers. However, the characteristic size of the dispersed phase increases gradually with annealing time for all blend systems studied. This demonstrates that the encapsulating layer of SMMA does not provide stability against static coalescence, which calls into question the effectiveness of random copolymers as practical compatibilizers. We interpret the encapsulation by random copolymers in terms of a simple model for ternary polymer blends. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35: 2835–2842, 1997     

Interfacial tension coefficient from the retraction of ellipsoidal drops

A new method for the determination of the interfacial tension coefficient between two immiscible fluids is proposed. The method is particularly useful for the binary polymer blends. The deformed drop retraction method, DDRM, makes it possible to determine the dynamic interfacial tension coefficient, ν, from the time evolution of a distorted fluid drop toward its equilibrium form. Analysis of this interfacial tension-driven process led to a theoretical relation between the shape retraction rate and the system's geometrical and rheological characteristics. Measurements of either low viscosity model systems or high viscosity industrial polymer mixtures led to a good agreement with values obtained from the widely used breaking thread method. DDRM enables to measure ν in polymeric blends of commercial interest—the high viscosity systems that would be very difficult to characterize by other techniques. Furthermore, for the first time it is possible to follow the time dependence of the interfacial tension coefficient, thus unambiguously determine the dynamic and equilibrium values of ν₁₂. For example, in low density polyethylene blends with polystyrene, LDPE/PS, ν decreased with the polymer-polymer contact time, t_c, from ν = 6.9 mN/m at t_c = 12 min, to ν = 5.2 mN/m at t_c ≥ 75 min—the latter may represent the true thermodynamic equilibrium value, ν₁₂. However, it is not clear whether such a reduction is exclusively due to the thermodynamically driven migration of chain-ends, low molecular weight fractions and additives, or by the thermal degradation as well. The contact time dependence of ν explained some of the differences reported for the data obtained using different measurement techniques, viz. pendant drop, capillary breakup, or ellipsoid retraction techniques. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35 : 1393–1403, 1997     

Effect of dispersed phase composition on morphological and mechanical properties of PET/EVA/PP ternary blends

Immiscible ternary blends of PET/EVA/PP (PET as the matrix and (PP/EVA) composition ratio = 1/1) were prepared by melt mixing. Scanning electron microscope results showed core‐shell type morphology for this ternary blend. Binary blends of PET/PP and PET/EVA were also prepared as control samples. Two grades of EVA with various viscosities, one higher and the other one lower than that of PP, were used to investigate the effect of components' viscosity on the droplet size of disperse phase. The effect of interfacial tension, elasticity, and viscosity on the disperse phase size of both binary and ternary blends was investigated. Variation of tensile modulus of both binary and ternary blends with dispersed phase content was also studied. Experimental results obtained for modulus of PET/EVA binary blends, showed no significant deviations from Takayanagi model, where considerable deviations were observed for PET/PP binary blends. Here, this model that has been originally proposed for binary blends was improved to become applicable for the prediction of the tensile modulus of ternary blends. The new modified model showed good agreement with the experimental data obtained in this study. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 251–259, 2010     

Effects of polystyrene‐b‐poly(ethylene/propylene)‐b‐polystyrene compatibilizer on the recycled polypropylene and recycled high‐impact polystyrene blends

The recycled polypropylene/recycled high‐impact polystyrene (R‐PP/R‐HIPS) blends were melt extruded by twin‐screw extruder and produced by injection molding machine. The effects of polystyrene‐b‐poly(ethylene/propylene)‐b‐polystyrene copolymer (SEPS) used as compatibilizer on the mechanical properties, morphology, melt flow index, equilibrium torque, and glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends were investigated. It was found that the notch impact strength and the elongation at break of the R‐PP/R‐HIPS blends with the addition of 10 wt% SEPS were 6.46 kJ/m² and 31.96%, which were significantly improved by 162.46% and 57.06%, respectively, than that of the uncompatibilized blends. Moreover, the addition of SEPS had a negligible effect on the tensile strength of the R‐PP/R‐HIPS blends. Additionally, the morphology of the blends demonstrated improved distribution and decreased size of the dispersed R‐HIPS phase with increasing the SEPS content. The increase of the melt flow index and the equilibrium torque indicated that the viscosity of the blends increased when the SEPS was incorporated into the R‐PP/R‐HIPS blends. The dynamic mechanical properties test showed that when the content of SEPS was 10 wt%, the difference of T_g decreased from 91.72°C to 81.51°C. The results obtained by differential scanning calorimetry were similar to those measured by dynamic mechanical properties, indicating an improved compatibility of the blends with the addition of SEPS.     

Effects of the molecular structure of styrene-isoprene block copolymers on the interfacial characteristics of polystyrene/polyisoprene blends

The effects of the molecular structure of the styrene-isoprene block copolymer on the interfacial tension, the morphology and the interfacial adhesion of polystyrene/polyisoprene were investigated. A reduction in interfacial tension is observed with the addition of a small amount of copolymer, followed by a leveling off as the copolymer concentration exceeds the critical micelle concentration. The reduction in interfacial tension between polystyrene and polyisoprene is more significant when the isoprene-rich diblock copolymer is added than the cases when the symmetric or styrene-rich diblock copolymer is added. The interfacial tension data seem to be consistent with the phase morphology and the interfacial adhesion: the lower the interfacial tension, the smaller the domain size of dispersed phase and the better the interfacial adhesion. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Cocontinuity and phase inversion in HDPE/PS blends: Influence of interfacial modification and elasticity

In this work the level of continuity and cocontinuity for blends of HDPE/PS prepared on a twin-screw extruder have been studied by both morphology and dissolution studies. Addition of SEBS as an interfacial modifier results in a shift of the percolation threshold for dispersed PS to higher concentrations. The region of phase inversion, however, is maintained at 70% PS. The shift in the percolation threshold to higher values is related to reduced elongation of the PS dispersed phase after interfacial compatibilization. These results indicate that an interfacial modifier significantly influences percolation phenomena without shifting the region of phase inversion. Models based on viscosity ratio have failed to predict the region of phase inversion in this study. Elastic effects are shown to be able to describe the basic tendencies. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 1889–1899, 1998     

Intractable high‐Tg thermoplastics processed with epoxy resin: Interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties of the cured blends

The intractable, high‐temperature‐resistant thermoplastics (TPs) polyphenylenether (PPE) and polyetherimide (PEI) were processed by dissolution into epoxy–amine precursors and a subsequent reaction of the precursors. Because the TP concentration was higher than the critical concentration, the phase separation produced a dispersion of crosslinked thermoset (TS) particles into a TP matrix. The morphology of the blends was examined with transmission electron microscopy and dynamic mechanical thermal spectroscopy, which showed completion of the phase separation. The interfacial adhesion at the TP‐matrix/TS‐particle interface was estimated on TP/TS bilayers to be 10 J/m² in PEI blends, whereas it was 70 J/m² in PPE blends, where there is strong evidence for in situ grafting between PPE phenolic chain ends and glycidyl functions of the reactive TS. Yielding in the compressive mode occurred at an intermediate yield stress between the components' values, and the anelastic deformation was separated from the plastic deformation. Fractures in the tensile mode occurred through debonding at the matrix/particle interfaces and coalescence of these defects, which led to microcrack formation and brittle failure. Mode I fracture toughness was, therefore, higher for PPE blends than for PEI blends, a result of the higher interfacial adhesion. However, a decrease from pure TP was observed. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 39: 363–373, 2001     

A study on melt grafting of maleic anhydride onto low‐density polyethylene and its blend with polyamide 6

Graft copolymerization of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) with a maleic anhydride (MAH) was performed using intermeshing corotating twin‐screw extruder in the presence of benzoyl peroxide (BPO). The LDPE/polyamide 6 (PA6) and LDPE‐g‐MAH/PA6 blends were prepared in a corotating twin‐screw extruder. The melt viscosity of the grafted LDPE was measured by a capillary rheometer. The grafted copolymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microcopy (SEM). The influence of the variation in temperature, BPO and MAH concentration, and temperature on the grafting degree and on the melt viscosity was studied. The grafting degree increased appreciably up to about 0.45 phr and then decreased continuously with an increasing BPO concentration. According to the FTIR analysis, it was found that the amount of grafted MAH on the LDPE chains was ～5.1%. Thermal analysis showed that melting temperature of the graft copolymers decreases with increasing grafting degree. In addition to this, loss modulus (E″) of the copolymers first increased little with increasing grafting and then obviously decreased with increasing grafting degree. Furthermore, the results revealed that the tensile strength of the blends increased linearly with increasing PA6 content. The results of SEM and mechanical test showed that the blends have good interfacial adhesion and good stability of the phase structure, which is reflected in the mechanical properties. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 267–275, 2010