Reactions of cyano(alkynyl)ethenes with some alkynyl- and diynyl-ruthenium complexes

Reactions of Ru(CCPh)(PPh₃)₂Cp with (NC)₂CCR¹R² (R¹ = H, R² = CCSiPrⁱ₃8; R¹ = R² = CCPh 9) have given η³-butadienyl complexes Ru{η³-C[C(CN)₂]CPhCR¹R²}(PPh₃)Cp (11, 12), respectively, by formal [2 + 2]-cycloaddition of the alkynyl and alkene, followed by ring-opening of the resulting cyclobutenyl (not detected) and displacement of a PPh₃ ligand. Deprotection (tbaf) of 11 and subsequent reactions with RuCl(dppe)Cp and AuCl(PPh₃) afforded binuclear derivatives Ru{η³-C[C(CN)₂]CPhCHCC[ML_n]}(PPh₃)Cp [ML_n = Ru(dppe)Cp 19, Au(PPh₃) 20]. Reactions between 8 and Ru(CCCCR)(PP)Cp [PP = (PPh₃)₂, R = Ph, SiMe₃, SiPrⁱ₃; PP = dppe, R = Ph] gave η¹-dienynyl complexes Ru{CCC[C(CN)₂]CRCH[CC(SiPrⁱ₃)]}(PP)Cp (15-18), respectively, in reactions not involving phosphine ligand displacement. The phthalodinitrile C₆H(CCSiMe₃)(CN)₂(NH₂)(SiMe₃) 10 was obtained serendipitously from (Me₃SiCC)₂CO and CH₂(CN)₂, as shown by an XRD structure determination. The XRD structures of precursor 7 and adducts 11, 12 and 17 are also reported.     

Lithiation of diynyl-ruthenium complexes: Routes to novel metallated functional diynes

Conditions for the efficient lithiation of the diynyl group in complexes Ru(CCCCH)(PP)Cp′ [(PP)Cp′ = (dppe)Cp* 1, (PPh₃)₂Cp 2] have been investigated. Addition of two equiv. LiBu to the diynyl complexes in thf solution at −78°C effects rapid conversion to putative Ru(CCCCLi)(PP)Cp′. Assays using subsequent reactions with either SiClMe₃ or AuCl(PPh₃) indicate that up to 80% conversion can be achieved. Reactions of the lithiated species with organic electrophiles [MeI, MeC(O)Cl, PhC(O)Cl, ClC(O)OMe, PhCHO, Ph₂CO] and metal-containing substrates [MClPh₃ (M = Ge, Sn), trans-RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂, cis-PtCl₂(PPh₃)₂, CuCl(PPh₃), (AuCl)₂(μ-dppm)] proceed to give functionalised diynyl complexes or bimetallic derivatives which are accessible only with difficulty or not at all from the parent diynes. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction molecular structures of Ru(CCCCR)(dppe)Cp* (R = Me, GePh₃) are reported: there is significantly greater delocalisation along the Ru-C₄-R chain in the GePh₃ derivative.     

Syntheses and molecular structures of some compounds containing many-atom chains end-capped by tricobalt carbonyl clusters

Several complexes containing Co₃ carbonyl clusters end-capping carbon chains of various lengths are described. Pd(0)/Cu(I)-catalysed reactions between {Co₃{μ₃-C(CC)₂Au(PPh₃)}(μ-dppm)(CO)₇ and I(CC)₂SiMe₃ or FcCCI gave {Co₃{μ₃-C(CC)_xR}(μ-dppm)(CO)₇ [x = 4, R = SiMe₃3; x = 3, R = Fc 8]; treatment of 3 with NaOMe and AuCl(PPh₃) gave 4 [x = 4, R = Au(PPh₃)]. Related preparations of Co₃{μ₃-C(CC)₂[Ru(PP)Cp′]}(μ-dppm)_n(CO)_9−2n [PP = (PPh₃)₂, Cp’ = Cp, n = 1, 5; PP = dppe, Cp′ = Cp^∗, n = 1, 6; 0, 7] are also described. Syntheses of bis-cluster complexes {Co₃(μ-dppm)(CO)₇}₂(μ-C_x) (x = 14, 12; 16, 9; 18, 11; 26, 10) - the latter being the longest cluster-capped C_x chains so far described - and the mercury-bridged compounds Hg{(CC)_xC[Co₃(μ-dppm)(CO)₇]}₂ (x = 1, 13; 2, 14) are reported. The molecular structures of 7, 12, 13 and 14, as well as of Co₃(μ₃-CCCSiMe₃)(μ-dppm)(CO)₆(PPh₃) (15) and Co₃{μ₃-CC(O)OEt}(μ-dppm)(CO)₇ (16), are reported.     

Organometallic complexes for nonlinear optics: Part 31. Cubic hyperpolarizabilities of ferrocenyl-linked gold and ruthenium complexes

The complexes [Fe{η-C₅H₄---(E)---CH=CH---4-C₆H₄CCX}₂] [X=SiMe₃ (1), H (2), Au(PCy₃) (3), Au(PPh₃) (4), Au(PMe₃) (5), RuCl(dppm)₂ (7), RuCl(dppe)₂ (8)] and [Fe{η-C₅H₄---(E)---CH=CH---4-C₆H₄CH=CRuCl(dppm)₂}₂](PF₆)₂ (6) have been prepared and the identities of 1 and 7 confirmed by single-crystal X-ray structural studies. Complexes 1–8 exhibit reversible oxidation waves in their cyclic voltammograms attributed to the Fe^II/III couple of the ferrocenyl groups, 6–8 also showing reversible (7, 8) or non-reversible (6) processes attributed to Ru-centered oxidation. Cubic nonlinearities at 800 nm by the Z-scan method are low for 1–5; in contrast, complexes 6 and 7 exhibit large negative γ_real and large γ_imag values. A factor of 4 difference in γ and two-photon absorption cross-section σ₂ values for 6 and 7 suggest that they have potential as protically switchable NLO materials.     

Chromium, iron, ruthenium and gold complexes of 3,3-(biphenyl-2,2′-diyl)-1-diphenylphosphino-1-phenylallene: A versatile ligand

Successive treatment of 9-(phenylethynyl)fluoren-9-ol (1a), with HBr, butyllithium and chlorodiphenylphosphine furnishes 3,3-(biphenyl-2,2′-diyl)-1-diphenylphosphino-1-phenylallene (5). Moreover, reaction of 1a directly with chlorodiphenylphosphine yields the corresponding allenylphosphine oxide (6). The allenylphosphine (5), and Fe₂(CO)₉ initially form the phosphine-Fe(CO)₄ complex, 11, which is very thermally sensitive and readily loses a carbonyl ligand. In the resulting phosphine-Fe(CO)₃ system, 12, the additional site at iron is coordinated by the allene double bond adjacent to phosphorus; the Fe(CO)₃ tripod in 12 exhibits restricted rotation on the NMR time-scale even at room temperature. The corresponding chromium complex, (5)-Cr(CO)₅ (9), has also been prepared. The gold complexes (5)-AuCl (13), and [(5)-Au(THT)]⁺ X⁻, where (THT) is tetrahydrothiophene, and X = PF₆ (14a), or ClO₄ (14b), are analogous to the known triphenylphosphine-gold complexes. In contrast, in the (arene)(allenylphosphine)RuCl₂ system the allene double bond adjacent to phosphorus displaces a chloride, and the resulting cationic species undergoes nucleophilic attack by water yielding ultimately a five-membered Ru-P-CC-O ruthenacycle (17). Thus, the allenylphosphine (5), reacts initially as a conventional mono-phosphine but, when the metal centre has a readily displaceable ligand such as a carbonyl or halide, the allene double bond adjacent to the phosphorus can also function as a donor. X-ray crystal structures are reported for 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14a, 14b and 17.     

Preparation and Structures of Several Complexes Containing Carbon-Rich Ligands Attached to Polynuclear Metal Carbonyls

Several new gold-containing cluster complexes have been prepared from the reactions of gold alkynyl complexes, L _n M-C _x -Au(PPh₃), (x = 3, 4, 6) with Ru₃(CO)₁₀(NCMe)₂. The bis-cluster complex 1,4-{AuRu₃(CO)₉(PPh₃)(μ₃-C₂)}₂C₆H₄ was obtained from Ru₃(CO)₁₀(NCMe)₂ and 1,4-{(Ph₃P)Au(C≡C)}₂C₆H₄. The complexes Ru₃(μ-H){μ₃-C₂C≡C[Ru(PP)Cp′]}(CO)₉ [PP = (PPh₃)₂, Cp′ = Cp; PP = dppe, Cp′ = Cp*] were also obtained as minor by-products and synthesised independently from Ru(C≡CC≡CH)(PP)Cp′. A reaction between Co₃{μ₃-CC≡CC≡CAu(PPh₃)}(μ-dppm)(CO)₇ and Ru₃(CO)₁₂ afforded {(Ph₃P)(OC)₉AuRu₃}C≡CC≡CC{Co₃(μ-dppm)(CO)₇} 7. Related complexes AuRu₃{μ₃-C₂C≡[M(CO)₂Tp]}(CO)₉(PPh₃) (M = Mo 8, W 9) were obtained from {Tp(OC)₂M}≡CC≡C{Au(PPh₃)}, while the mixed metal cluster complexes MoM₂(C₂Me)(CO)₈Tp (M = Ru 13, Fe 14) were obtained from M(≡CC≡CSiMe₃)(CO)₂Tp (M = Mo, W) with Fe₂(CO)₉ and Ru₃(CO)₁₂, respectively. Reactions of the Mo carbyne complex with Co₂(LL)(CO)₆ [LL = (CO)₂, μ-dppm] or nickelocene afforded complexes 15–17 in which Co₂ and Ni₂ fragments, respectively, had coordinated to the C≡C triple bond. XRD structural determinations of 7, 8, 14, 16 and {Tp(OC)₂W}≡CC≡CC≡{Co₃(μ-dppm)(CO)₇} (18-W) are reported. In memoriam: F. Albert Cotton (1930–2007).     

Two gold-ruthenium clusters derived from Ru3(μ-H)3(μ3-CBr)(CO)9

The reaction between AuMe(PPh₃) and Ru₃(μ-H)₃(μ₃-CBr)(CO)₉ (1) affords the novel heptanuclear cluster Au₄Ru₃(μ₃-CMe)(Br)(CO)₉(PPh₃)₃ (2), containing an Au/Ru₃/Au trigonal pyramidal cluster face-capped by two Au(PPh₃) groups and a CMe ligand, together with Au₂Ru₃(μ-H)(μ₃-CMe)(CO)₉(PPh₃)₂ (3), formed by isolobal replacement of two of the three μ-H atoms in 1 by Au(PPh₃) groups. The latter co-crystallises with the analogous μ₃-CH complex, as also shown spectroscopically.     

The preparation and structural characterization of ruthenium carbonyl cluster complexes containing 3,3 dimethylthietane ligands

The reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with 3,3 dimethylthietane (DMT) at 68°C yielded the new tetraruthenium cluster complex Ru₄(CO)₁₂(-SCH₂CMe₂CH₂)₂,1 in 23% yield. Compound1 was characterized crystallographically and was shown to consist of a puckered square of four ruthenium atoms with two DMT ligands bridging opposite sides of the cluster via the sulfur atoms. Compound1 reacts with CO (98°C/1 atm) to yield the new tetraruthenium complex Ru₄(CO)₁₃ (-SCH₂CMe₂CH₂),2 in 69% yield. Compound2 consists of a butterfly tetrahedral cluster of four ruthenium atoms with a DMT ligand bridging the wing-tip metal atoms. Addition of DMT to2 regenerates1 in 67% yield. Crystal data—1: space group = ,a=17.490(2) Å,b=18.899(3) Å,c=9.781(1) Å, =93.06(1)°, =91.06(1)°, =105.239(9)°,Z=4, 5799 reflections,R=0.026; for2: space group = P2₁/n,a=15.430(3) Å,b=18.285(4) Å,c=9.850(2) Å, =90.05(2)°,Z=4, 2111 reflections,R=0.036.     

Half-sandwich trihydrido ruthenium complexes

This paper reports facile preparation of half-sandwich trihydrido complexes of ruthenium based on the reactions of the readily available precursors [Cp(R₃P)Ru(NCCH₃)₂][PF₆] with LiAlH₄. The target complexes were characterized by spectroscopic methods and X-ray structure analysis of .     

Synthesis and structural characterization of ruthenium complexes with 1-aryl-imidazole-2-thione

Treatment of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with 2 equiv. Himt^MPh (Himt^MPh?=?1-(4-methyl-phenyl)-imidazole-2-thione) in the presence of MeONa afforded cis-[Ru(κ ²-S,N-imt^MPh)₂(PPh₃)₂] (1), while interaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] and 2 equiv. Himt^MPh in tetrahydrofuran (THF) without base gave [RuCl₂(κ ¹-S-Himt^MPh)₂(PPh₃)₂] (2). Treatment of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 1 equiv. Himt^MPh in THF gave [RuHCl(κ ¹-S-Himt^MPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (3), whereas reaction of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 1 equiv. of the deprotonated [imt^MPh]^? or [imt^NPh]^? (imt^NPh?=?1-(4-nitro-phenyl)-2-mercaptoimidazolyl) gave [RuH(κ ²-S,N-imt^RPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (R?=?M 4a, R?=?N 4b). The ruthenium hydride complexes 4a and 4b easily convert to their corresponding ruthenium chloride complexes [RuCl(κ ²-S,N-imt^MPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (5a) and [RuCl(κ ²-S,N-imt^NPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (5b), respectively, in refluxing CHCl₃ by chloride substitution of the RuH. Photolysis of 5a in CHCl₃ at room temperature afforded an oxidized product [RuCl₂(κ ²-S,N-imt^MPh)(PPh₃)₂] (6). Reaction of 6 with excess [imt^MPh]^? afforded 1. The molecular structures of 1·EtOH, 3·C₆H₁₄, 4b·0.25CH₃COCH₃, and 6·2CH₂Cl₂ have been determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography.     

Ruthenium(III)-carbonyl and ruthenium(II)-nitrosyl complexes of nitrogen-containing ligands with ethoxysilane groups

Reactions of γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and 4-(diethylamino)salicylaldehyde in ethanol afforded a Schiff base L1H, which reacted with [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_n in the presence of Et₃N in THF giving a ruthenium(III) carbonyl complex RuCl(CO)₂(η¹-O-L1)(η²-O,N-L1) (1). Treatment of γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane with 4-pyridinecarboxaldehyde gave the Schiff base L2. Interactions of L2, γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, and Ru(NO)Cl₃?H₂O in THF led to the formation of a ruthenium(II) nitrosyl complex RuCl₃(NO)(L2)[H₂N(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃] (2) with linear N≡O ligand. Complexes 1 and 2 were characterized by microanalyses and IR and MS spectroscopies and confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Strukturen ladungsgestörter oder räumlich überfüllter Moleküle. 15. Tetracyanethen-Natrium-Dimethoxyethan

Structures of Charge-Perturbed or Sterically Overcrowded Molecules. 16. Tetracyanoethylene Sodium Dimethoxyethane The Single crystal structure of [(NC)₂C? C(CN)₂?·Na⊕(H₃CO? CH₂CH₂? OCH₃)]∞ reveals two formula units within the triclinic (P1 ) unit cell. The tetracyanoethylene radical anions are arranged along parallel double layers, which are shifted relative to each other, and in between which are interspersed the sodium counter cations and their dimethoxyethane ligands. The distances within the double layers amount to 300 pm and the ones between them to 385 pm. The six-fold coordinated Na⊕ centers are surrounded by four radical anions with contact distances Na…?N between 250 and 254 pm as well as by a twofold solvent ligand with Na…?O of 238 and 241 pm. Due to the electron transfer to the acceptor molecule, its (NC)₂C-halves twist by 8° and the bond lengths of the N?C? C subunits, bent by each 3°, are shortened up to 2 pm. The structural parameters are compared to those of the analogous potassium salt [TCNE^?K^⊕DME], of the dianion , of the sodium salts [(NC)₃C^?Na^⊕]∞ as well as [(NC)₂C? C(CHCH)₂? C(CN)₂^?Na^⊕]_∞ and, in addition, are discussed based on geometry-optimized MNDO calculations.     

Synthesis of Re-Ru heterobimetallic polyhydride complexes. Study of the influence of ligands bonded to the monometallic precursors on the nature of the isolated binuclear complexes

The reaction of K[H₆ReL₂] with [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)_3−x {P(OPrⁱ}₃)_x](L₂ = (PMePh₂)₂, dppe, (AsPh₃)₂, or (PPh₃)₂; x = 0, 1 or 2) leads to [L₂(CO)HRe(μ-H)₃RuH(PPh₃)_2−y{P(OPrⁱ)₃}_y] (x = 0 or 1, Y = 0; X = 2, Y = 1(L₂ = PPh₃)) in a first step. Under the reaction conditions most of these complexes react rapidly with the liberated phosphine giving [L₂(CO)Re(μ-H)₃Ru(PPh₃)_3−y- {P(OPrⁱ)₃}_y] (L₂ = (PMePh₂)₂ or dppe, Y = 0; L₂ = (PPh₃)₂, Y = 1) as the only iso complexes. The structure of [(PMePh₂)₂(CO)Re(μ-H)₃Ru(PPh₃)₃] has been establishedby X-ray structure analysis. The complex [(PPh₃)₂(CO)Re(μ-H)₃Ru(PPh₃)₂(P(OPrⁱ)₃)] reacts with molecular hydrogen under pressure to generate [L₂(CO)HRe(μ-H)₃RuH(PPh₃)(P(OPrⁱ)₃) as the sole product.     

Structural Studies of Some Compounds Containing C2 Fragments Attached to Various Metal‐Ligand End‐Groups

The preparation, characterisation and single‐crystal XRD molecular structure determinations of four complexes containing –CC–ML_n end‐groups, namely Ru{C≡CFc′(I)}(dppe)Cp ( 1 ), the vinylidene [Os(=C=CH₂)(PPh₃)₂Cp]PF₆ ( 2 ), trans‐Pt(C≡CC₆H₄‐4‐C≡CPh){C≡CC₆H₄‐4‐C₂Ph[Co₂(μ‐dppm)(CO)₄]}(PPh₃)₂ ( 3 ), and C₆H₄{μ₃‐C₂[AuRu₃(CO)₉(PPh₃)]}₂‐1,4 ( 4 ) are reported. In these compounds a range of –CC– environments is found, extending from the σ‐bonded alkynyl group in 1 to examples where the C₂ unit interacts with either a proton (in vinylidene 2 ), by bridging a dicobalt carbonyl moiety (in 3 ) or the AuRu₃ cluster in 4 . Changes in geometry are rationalised by considering the various bonding modes.     

X-ray structure and DFT study of neutral mixed phosphine azoimine complexes of ruthenium

Geometry optimization for a cis-[Ru^II(dppe)LCl₂] (1-8) {L = C₆H₅NNC(COCH₃)NAr, Ar = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl (L₁), 2,5-dimethylphenyl (L₂), 4-tolyl (L₃), phenyl (L₄), 4-methoxyphenyl (L₅), 4-chlorophenyl (L₆), 4-nitrophenyl (L₇), 2,5-dichlorophenyl (L₈); dppe = Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂} was effected using the gaussian 03 protocol at density functional theory (DFT) B3LYP level with 6-31G^∗/lanl2dz mixed basis. In addition, the complex cis-[Ru^II(dppe)L₃Cl₂] (3) has been further characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. It was found that the optimized structure using 6-31G^∗/lanl2dz has a large agreement with the X-ray data. DFT calculations show that upon solvation both Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO) and Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) molecular orbitals are stabilized and their energy gap is increased. TD-DFT calculations show that the intense broad band centered at λ_max ∼ 506 nm is assigned to “mixed metal-ligand-to-ligand charge-transfer” (MMLLCT) while the weak low energy band centered on ∼840 nm is assigned to the pure MLCT transition. The low intensity for the low energy MLCT transition can be explained by the large mixing between the azoimine (L) and (Ru(dπ)) orbital.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of two cationic dinuclear cymene-ruthenium(II) complexes with thiolato and chloro bridges

Treatment of [(p-cymene)RuCl₂]₂ with HSp-Tol or HSCH₂Ph in the presence of K[PF₆] gave the cationic dinuclear cymene–ruthenium(II) complexes [(p-cymene)₂Ru₂(μ-Cl)(μ-Sp-Tol)₂][PF₆] (1) and [(p-cymene)₂Ru₂(μ-Cl)(μ-SCH₂Ph)₂][PF₆] (2), respectively, which have been characterized by IR, NMR spectroscopies and mass spectrometry along with microanalyses. Their crystal structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. The structures of the cationic complexes contain the unusual pseudo-trigonal-bipyramidal Ru₂S₂Cl framework without a ruthenium–ruthenium single bond. The two p-cymene–ruthenium units are held together by two bridging thiolates and one bridging chloride.     

Synthesis and characterization of dinuclear monohydro sesquifulvalene complexes with potential NLO properties

E-1-(1″-hydroxycarbonylferrocen-1′-yl)-2-(cycloheptatrienyl)ethene (4) was synthesized by using selective transmetallation reactions. Reaction of 4 with [Cp*Ru(CH₃CN)₃](PF₆) revealed the vinylogue monohydro sesquifulvalene complex E-1-(1″-hydroxycarbonylferrocen-1′-yl)-2-{(1?-6?-η-cyclohepta-1?,3?,5?-trien-1?-yl)(η⁵-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II)}ethene hexafluorophosphate (5). X-ray structure analysis demonstrates that complex 5 crystallizes in the triclinic space group , which forms discrete dimers via two hydrogen bonds between the carboxylic functions. Reaction of complex 5 with triethylamine or NaHCO₃ generated a new organometallic zwitterion E-1-(1″-oxycarbonylferrocen-1′-yl)-2-{(1?-6?-η-cyclohepta-1?,3?,5?-trien-1?-yl)(η⁵-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II)}ethene (6), which was characterized by UV, IR, and NMR spectra.     

Syntheses,characterization, and crystal structures of ruthenium(II)/(III) complexes with tridentate salicylaldiminato ligands

Treatment of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with one equivalent of tridentate Schiff base 2-[(2-dimethylamino-ethylimino)-methyl]-phenol (HL) in the presence of triethylamine afforded a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₃(κ²-N,N-NH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂)(PPh₃)] as a result of decomposition of HL. Interaction of HL and one equivalent of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃], [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] or [Ru(tht)₄Cl₂] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) under different conditions led to isolation of the corresponding ruthenium(II) complexes [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)(PPh₃)] (2), [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)₂] (3), and a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₂(κ³-N,N,O-L)(tht)] (4), respectively. Molecular structures of 1·CH₂Cl₂, 2·CH₂Cl₂, 3 and 4 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Synthesis,characterization, and cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of ruthenium(II) arene complexes with N,N-bidentate ligands

Three new complexes, [(η⁶-C₆H₆)RuCl(C₅H₄N-2-CH=N-Ar)]PF₆ (Ar = phenylmethylene (1), (4-methoxyphenyl)methylene (2), and phenylhydrazone (3)), were prepared by reacting [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ with N,N′-bidentate ligands in a 1 : 2 ratio. Full characterization of the complexes was accomplished using ¹H and ¹³C NMR, elemental and thermal analyses, UV–vis and IR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray structures. Single crystal structures confirmed a pseudo-octahedral three-legged, piano-stool geometry around Ru(II), with the ligand coordinated to the ruthenium(II) through two N atoms. The cytotoxicity of the mononuclear complexes was established against three human cancer cell lines and selectivity was also tested against non-cancerous human epithelial kidney (HEK 293) cells. The compounds were selective toward the tumor cells in contrast to the known anti-cancer drug 5-fluoro uracil which was not selective between the tumor cells and non-tumor cells. All the compounds showed moderate activity against MCF7 (human breast adenocarcinoma), but showed low antiproliferative activity against Caco-2 and HepG2. Also, antimicrobial activities of the complexes were tested against a panel of antimicrobial-susceptible and -resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Of special interest is the anti-mycobacterial activity of all three synthesized complexes against Mycobacterium smegmatis, and bactericidal activity against resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300.     

Synthesis and structures of gold(I) phosphine complexes containing monoanionic selenocarbamate ester ligands

A series of mono- and dinuclear gold(I) phosphine complexes of the type [Au{SeC(OMe)NPh}(P)] [P = PPh₃, PTA, P(o-tolyl)₃, P(p-MeOC₆H₄)₃] and [Au₂{SeC(OMe)NPh}₂(μ-PP)] (PP = dppm, dppe, dppp, dppf, dppee) were prepared from the reaction of the appropriate chlorogold(I) phosphine complexes with N-phenyl-O-methylselenocarbamide in the presence of base. These new complexes were fully characterised by spectroscopic techniques and, in several cases, by X-ray crystallography. The differences in the solid-state structures of these selenium complexes were compared with those of some sulfur analogues.