Improving the identification of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis

In order to assess the efficiencies of a set of production units, it is necessary to identify the nature of returns to scale which characterise efficient production. Some methods have been developed to test the nature of the scale elasticity across the full range of scale sizes. However these tests are heavily weighted by the majority of the units and may not identify small ranges of scale size where different returns to scale hold. This paper develops a procedure based on a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis and regression analysis to identify the ranges of scale size where the returns to scale may differ from those in other ranges for the single-output, multi-input case. We also develop a measure of scale size across different input mixes.     

Duality in data envelopment analysis under constant returns to scale

This paper explores duality in models of data envelopment analysis(DEA) for assessing the productive efficiencies of organizationalunits where efficient production is characterized by constantreturns to scale. The paper identifies dualityof the spacesin which efficiency is measured and discusses the practicalimplications of duality in DEA.     

An investigation on the sensitivity and stability radius of returns to scale and efficiency in data envelopment analysis

An issue which has received widespread attention in rapidly growing field of DEA is the sensitivity of the results of analysis to perturbations in the data.     

An additive model approach for estimating returns to scale in imprecise data envelopment analysis

In this paper, additive model is used to provide an alternative approach for estimating returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. The proposed model is developed in both stochastic and fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Deterministic (crisp) equivalents are obtained which correspond to the stochastic and fuzzy models. Numerical examples are, also, used to illustrate the proposed approaches.     

Stochastic models and variable returns to scales in data envelopment analysis

Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models were developed by taking random disturbances into account for the possibility of variations in input-output data structure. The stochastic efficiency measure of a Decision Making Unit (DMU) is defined via joint probabilistic comparisons of inputs and outputs with other DMUs, and can be characterized by solving a chance constrained programming problem. Deterministic equivalents are derived for both situations of multivariate symmetric random disturbances and a single random factor in the production relationships. An analysis of stochastic variable returns to scale is developed.     

A simple derivation of scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we suggest a simple derivation of the formulae for the scale elasticity in the variable returns-to-scale technology as used in data envelopment analysis. Our development is consistent with the existing literature but the proof is much shorter and applies to the general case without any simplifying conditions.     

Returns to scale in multiplicative models in data envelopment analysis

One class of models introduced in DEA is called multiplicative models, in which, as shown by Banker and Maindiratta (Manag. Sci. 32:126–135, 1986), the piecewise linear frontiers usually employed in DEA are replaced by a frontier that is piecewise Cobb-Douglas(=log  linear). Banker and Maindiratta (Manag. Sci. 32:126–135, 1986) introduced a model to identify the most productive scale size pattern, and Banker et al. (Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154:345–362, 2004) presented a two-stage method for the identification of returns to scale (RTS) in multiplicative models. In this paper it is shown that both the RTS situation and the MPSS pattern could be determined by a single model in one step. The new method is important in the computational point of view.     

Dealing with interval scale data in data envelopment analysis

This paper considers the problem of interval scale data in the most widely used models of data envelopment analysis (DEA), the CCR and BCC models. Radial models require inputs and outputs measured on the ratio scale. Our focus is on how to deal with interval scale variables especially when the interval scale variable is a difference of two ratio scale variables like profit or the decrease/increase in bank accounts. We suggest the use of these ratio scale variables in a radial DEA model.     

Improving envelopment in Data Envelopment Analysis under variable returns to scale

In a Data Envelopment Analysis model, some of the weights used to compute the efficiency of a unit can have zero or negligible value despite of the importance of the corresponding input or output. This paper offers an approach to preventing inputs and outputs from being ignored in the DEA assessment under the multiple input and output VRS environment, building on an approach introduced in Allen and Thanassoulis (2004) for single input multiple output CRS cases. The proposed method is based on the idea of introducing unobserved DMUs created by adjusting input and output levels of certain observed relatively efficient DMUs, in a manner which reflects a combination of technical information and the decision maker’s value judgements. In contrast to many alternative techniques used to constrain weights and/or improve envelopment in DEA, this approach allows one to impose local information on production trade-offs, which are in line with the general VRS technology. The suggested procedure is illustrated using real data.     

A unified approach to radial,hyperbolic, and directional efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis

The paper analyses properties of a large class of “path-based” Data Envelopment Analysis models through a unifying general scheme. The scheme includes the well-known oriented radial models, the hyperbolic distance function model, the directional distance function models, and even permits their generalisations. The modelling is not constrained to non-negative data and is flexible enough to accommodate variants of standard models over arbitrary data.Mathematical tools developed in the paper allow systematic analysis of the models from the point of view of ten desirable properties. It is shown that some of the properties are satisfied (resp., fail) for all models in the general scheme, while others have a more nuanced behaviour and must be assessed individually in each model. Our results can help researchers and practitioners navigate among the different models and apply the models to mixed data.     

A data envelopment approach to decision analysis

A decision aid to assist the development of a linear valuation function for multiple attribute problems is proposed, based on a linear programming formulation using a constraint set structured in a similar manner to data envelopment analysis (DEA). Value functions which favour each decision option are calculated, and efficient, potentially optimal, options identified. These are used to help a decision maker progressively to articulate preferences, indicators of his/her values, in an interactive, structurally flexible manner. As preference indications are provided, candidate value functions and hitherto efficient options inconsistent with his/her declarations are eliminated, thus proceeding towards an explicit value function and, if needed a corresponding complete option order.     

Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis

The relation between the most productive scale size (mpss) for paparticular input and output mixes and returns to scale for multiple-inputs multiple-outputs situations is explicitly developed. This relation is then employed to extend the applications of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) introduced by Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR) to the estimation of most productive scale sizes for convex production possibility sets. It is then shown that in addition to productive inefficiencies at the actual scale size, the CCR efficiency measure also reflects any inefficiencies due to divergence from the most productive scale size. Two illustrations of the practical applications of these results to the estimation of most productive scale sizes and returns to scale for hospitals and stem-electric generation plants are also provided emphasize the advantage of this method in examining specific segments of the efficient production surface.     

A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we present a Multiple Criteria Data Envelopment Analysis (MCDEA) model which can be used to improve discriminating power of DEA methods and also effectively yield more reasonable input and output weights without a priori information about the weights. In the proposed model, several different efficiency measures, including classical DEA efficiency, are defined under the same constraints. Each measure serves as a criterion to be optimized. Efficiencies are then evaluated under the framework of multiple objective linear programming (MOLP). The method is illustrated through three examples in which data sets are taken from previous research on DEA's discriminating power and weight restriction.     

A comment on “Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis”

Fukuyama [Fukuyama, H., 2000. Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 125, 93–112] provided some characterizations of scale elasticity and returns to scale in DEA. In this paper, we present some counterexamples and comments to the main lemma of the afore-mentioned paper, based on which Fukuyama’s idea has been built.     

Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis

This paper serves as an introduction to a series of three papers which are directed to different aspects of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) as follows: (1) uses and extensions of window analyses' to study DEA efficiency measures with an illustrative applications to maintenance activities for U.S. Air Force fighter wings, (2) a comparison of DEA and regression approaches to identifying and estimating, sources of inefficiency by means of artificially generated data, and (3) an extension of ordinary (linear programming) sensitivity analyses to deal with special features that require attention in DEA. Background is supplied in this introductory paper with accompanying proofs and explanations to facilitate understanding of what DEA provides in the way of underpinning for the papers that follow. An attempt is made to bring readers abreast of recent progress in DEA research and uses. A synoptic history is presented along with brief references to related work, and problems requiring attention are also indicated and possible research approaches also suggested.This research was partly supported by the National Science Foundation and USARI Contract MDA 903-83-K0312, with the Center for Cybernetic Studies, the University of Texas at Austin. It was also partly supported by the IC² Institute at the University of Texas at Austin. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the U.S. Government.     

Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis

This paper proposes a dynamic data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to measure the system and period efficiencies at the same time for multi-period systems, where quasi-fixed inputs or intermediate products are the source of inter-temporal dependence between consecutive periods. A mathematical relationship is derived in which the complement of the system efficiency is a linear combination of those of the period efficiencies. The proposed model is also more discriminative than the existing ones in identifying the systems with better performance. Taiwanese forests, where the forest stock plays the role of quasi-fixed input, are used to illustrate this approach. The results show that the method for calculating the system efficiency in the literature produces over-estimated scores when the dynamic nature is ignored. This makes it necessary to conduct a dynamic analysis whenever data is available.     

Multiobjective data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is popularly used to evaluate relative efficiency among public or private firms. Most DEA models are established by individually maximizing each firm's efficiency according to its advantageous expectation by a ratio. Some scholars have pointed out the interesting relationship between the multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problem and the DEA problem. They also introduced the common weight approach to DEA based on MOLP. This paper proposes a new linear programming problem for computing the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU). The proposed model differs from traditional and existing multiobjective DEA models in that its objective function is the difference between inputs and outputs instead of the outputs/inputs ratio. Then an MOLP problem, based on the introduced linear programming problem, is formulated for the computation of common weights for all DMUs. To be precise, the modified Chebychev distance and the ideal point of MOLP are used to generate common weights. The dual problem of this model is also investigated. Finally, this study presents an actual case study analysing R&D efficiency of 10 TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan to illustrate this new approach. Our model demonstrates better performance than the traditional DEA model as well as some of the most important existing multiobjective DEA models.