On the van der Waerden conjecture and zeros of polynomials

Let

$\text{F(x) =}\text{∑}\text{k=o}\text{n}\text{n}\text{k}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$

$\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{≠ 0,}$

and

$\text{G(x) =}\text{∑}\text{k=o}\text{n}\text{n}\text{k}\text{B}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$

$\text{B}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{≠ 0,}$

be polynomials with real zeros satisfying A_n?1 = B_n?1 = 0, and let

$\text{H(x) =}\text{∑}\text{k=o}\text{n-2}\text{n}\text{k}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{B}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{.}$

Using the recently proved validity of the van der Waerden conjecture on permanents, some results on the real zeros of H(x) are obtained. These results are related to classical results on composite polynomials.     

On majorization and Schur products

Suppose A, D₁,…,D_m are n × n matrices where A is self-adjoint, and let $\text{X = Σ}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{k\; =\; 1}}\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{AD}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{k}}$. It is shown that if $\text{ΣD}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{D}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{= ΣD}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{= I}$, then the spectrum of X is majorized by the spectrum of A. In general, without assuming any condition on D₁,…,D_m, a result is obtained in terms of weak majorization. If each D_k is a diagonal matrix, then X is equal to the Schur (entrywise) product of A with a positive semidefinite matrix. Thus the results are applicable to spectra of Schur products of positive semidefinite matrices. If A, B are self-adjoint with B positive semidefinite and if b_ii = 1 for each i, it follows that the spectrum of the Schur product of A and B is majorized by that of A. A stronger version of a conjecture due to Marshall and Olkin is also proved.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

Arnold's canonical matrices and the asymptotic simplification of ordinary differential equations

Let A(x,ε) be an n×n matrix function holomorphic for |x|?x₀, 0<ε?ε₀, and possessing, uniformly in x, an asymptotic expansion $\text{A(x,ε)?Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{r=0}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(x) ε}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, as ε→0⁺. An invertible, holomorphic matrix function P(x,ε) with an asymptotic expansion $\text{P(x,ε)?Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{r=0}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(x)ε}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, as ε→0⁺, is constructed, such that the transformation y = P(x,ε)z takes the differential equation $\text{ε}{}^{\mathrm{h}}\text{dy}\text{dx}\text{= A(x,ε)y,h}$ a positive integer, into $\text{ε}{}^{\mathrm{h}}\text{dz}\text{dx}\text{= B(x,ε)z}$, where B(x,ε) is asymptotically equal, to all orders, to a matrix in a canonical form for holomorphic matrices due to V.I. Arnold.     

On matrix functions which commute with their derivative

We improve several results published from 1950 up to 1982 on matrix functions commuting with their derivative, and establish two results of general interest. The first one gives a condition for a finite-dimensional vector subspace E(t) of a normed space not to depend on t, when t varies in a normed space. The second one asserts that if A is a matrix function, defined on a set ?, of the form A(t)= U diag(B₁(t),…,B_p(t)) U^-1, t ∈ ?, and if each matrix function B_k has the polynomial form

$\text{B}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(t)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{ki}}\text{(t)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{, t∈ ?, k∈{1,…,p}}$

then A itself has the polynomial form

$\text{A(t)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{d?1}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)C}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{,t∈?}$

, where

$\text{d=}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{p}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$

, d_k being the degree of the minimal polynomial of the matrix C_k, for every k ∈ {1,…,p}.     

On a conjecture by D. Ž. D̄okovic

It is shown that if $\text{A?Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?{J}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$ satisfies

$\text{nkσ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(A)?(n?k+1)}{}^2\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{(A)}$

$\text{(k=1,2,…,n)}$

, where σ_k(A) denotes the sum of all kth order subpermanent of A, then Per[λJ_n+(1?λ)A] is strictly decreasing in the interval 0<λ<1.     

On the convergence of the Neumann series in interval analysis

Let $\text{A}$ be a real or complex n × n interval matrix. Then it is shown that the Neumann series $\text{Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$ is convergent iff the sequence {$\text{A}$^k} converges to the null matrix $\text{O}$, i.e., iff the spectral radius of the real comparison matrix $\text{B}$ constructed in [2] is less than one.     

Transcendental continued fractions

In a previous paper it was proven that given the continued fractions

$\text{A = a}{}_1\text{+}\text{1}\text{a}{}_2\text{+}\text{1}\text{a}{}_3\text{+… and B = b}{}_1\text{+}\text{1}\text{b}{}_2\text{+}\text{1}\text{b}{}_3\text{+…}$

where the a's and b's are positive integers, then A, B, A ± B, $\text{A}\text{B}$ and AB are irrational numbers if $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{2}\text{> b}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{> a}{}_{\mathrm{n?1}}{}^{\mathrm{5n}}$ for all n sufficiently large, and transcendental numbers if for all n sufficiently large. Using a more direct approach it is proven in this paper that A, B, A ± B, $\text{A}\text{B}$ and AB are transcendental numbers if a_n > b_n > a_n?1^(n?1)2 for all n sufficiently large.     

On the fair coin tossing process

Let Ω = {1, 0} and for each integer n ≥ 1 let $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= Ω × Ω × … × Ω}$ (n-tuple) and $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{= {(a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)|(a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{, … , a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{and}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= k}}$ for all k = 0,1,…,n. Let {Y_m}_m≥1 be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables such that $\text{P(Y}{}_1\text{= 0) = P(Y}{}_1\text{= 1) =}\text{1}\text{2}$. For each A in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$, let T_A be the first occurrence time of A with respect to the stochastic process {Y_m}_m≥1. R. Chen and A.Zame (1979, J. Multivariate Anal. 9, 150–157) prove that if n ≥ 3, then for each element A in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$, there is an element B in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ such that the probability that T_B is less than T_A is greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$. This result is sharpened as follows: (I) for n ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ k ≤ n ? 1, each element A in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$, there is an element B also in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$ such that the probability that T_B is less than T_A is greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$; (II) for n ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ k ≤ n ? 1, each element A = (a₁, a₂,…,a_n) in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$, there is an element C also in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$ such that the probability that T_A is less than T_C is greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$ if n ≠ 2m or n = 2m but a_i = a_{i + 1} for some 1 ≤ i ≤ n?1. These new results provide us with a better and deeper understanding of the fair coin tossing process.     

Lower bounds for the norm of the symmetric product

Suppose each of m, n, and k is a positive integer, k ? n, A is a (real-valued) symmetric n-linear function on E_m, and B is a k-linear symmetric function on E_m. The tensor and symmetric products of A and B are denoted, respectively, by A ?B and A?B. The identity

$\text{6A · B6}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{q=0}\text{n}\text{(}\text{n}\text{k}\text{)}\text{(}\text{n+k}\text{k}\text{)}\text{6A?}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{B6}{}^2$

is proven by Neuberger in [1]. An immediate consequence of this identity is the inequality

$\text{6A · B 6}{}^2\text{?}\text{n+k}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{6A · B 6}{}^2$

In this paper a necessary and sufficient condition for

$\text{6A · B 6}{}^2\text{=}\text{n+k}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{6A · B 6}{}^2$

is given. It is also shown that under certain conditions the inequality can be considerably improved. This improvement results from an analysis of the terms 6A?_qB6, 1?q?n, appearing in the identity.     

A decomposition theorem for an analytic function

Let f(z), an analytic function with radius of convergence R (0 < R < ∞) be represented by the gap series ∑_{k = 0}^∞c_kz^λ_k. Set and define the growth constants ?, λ, T, t by

$\text{?}\text{λ}\text{=}\text{lim sup}\text{r→R}\text{inf}\text{{}\text{log}\text{[Rr /(R?r)]}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{M(r)}}$

, and if 0 < ? < ∞,

$\text{T}\text{t}\text{=}\text{lim sup}\text{r→R}\text{inf}\text{{[Rr /(R?r)]}{}^{\mathrm{??}}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{M(r)}}$

. Then, assuming 0 < t < T < ∞, we obtain a decomposition theorem for f(z).     

About some problems of spectral synthesis

For a given pair $\text{(A,b)∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times n}}\text{×}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$ such that A is cyclic and b is a cyclic generator (with respect to A) of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$, it is shown that for every nonnegative integer m we can find a nonnegative integer t and a sequence $\text{{f}{}_{\mathrm{j\}}}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{,f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{1\times n}}$,so that a the zeros of the rational function det P(z), where $\text{P(z) = zI ? A ? ∑}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{-(m+j)}}\text{b?}$_f, lie in the open unit disc in the complex plane. The result is directly applicable to a stabilizability problem for linear systems with a time delay in control action.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Asymptotic results for partitions (II) and a conjecture of Bateman and Erdös

Asymptotic results are obtained for p_A^(k)(n), the kth difference of the function p_A(n) which is the number of partitions of n into integers from A. Under certain restrictions on A it is shown that

$\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{A}}{}^{\mathrm{(k+1)}}\text{(n)}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{A}}{}^{\mathrm{(k)}}\text{(n)}\text{= O(n}{}^{\mathrm{?1/2}}\text{) (n→ ∫)}$

thereby verifying for these A a conjecture of Bateman and Erdös.     

Votes and a half-binomial

In two party elections with popular vote ratio $\text{p}\text{q}\text{,}\text{1}\text{2}\text{≤p=1 ?q}$, a theoretical model suggests replacing the so-called MacMahon cube law approximation $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^3$, for the ratio $\text{P}\text{Q}$ of candidates elected, by the ratio $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(q)}$ of the two half sums in the binomial expansion of (p+q)^2k+1 for some k. This ratio is nearly $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^3$ when k = 6. The success probability $\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)=(}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{(p}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+q}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}$ for the power law $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{?}\text{P}\text{Q}$ is shown to so closely approximate $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)=Σ}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1}}\text{)p}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1?r}}\text{q}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, if we choose $\text{a = a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(2k+1)!}\text{4}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{k!k!}$, that $\text{1≤}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{≤1.01884086}$ for $\text{k≥1}\text{if}\text{1}\text{2}\text{≤p≤1}$. Computationally, we avoid large binomial coefficients in computing $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}$ for k>22 by expressing $\text{2?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)?1}$ as the sum $\text{(p?q) Σ}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(4pq)}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(2s+1)}$, whose terms decrease by the factors $\text{(4pq)(1?}\text{1}\text{2s}\text{)}$. Setting K = 4k+3, we compute a_k for the large k using a continued fraction $\text{πa}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^2\text{=}\text{K+1}{}^2\text{(}\text{2K+3}{}^2\text{(}\text{2K+5}{}^2\text{(2K+…)}\text{)}\text{)}$ derived from the ratio of π to the finite Wallis product approximation.     

K2 and K3 of the circle

Let k be $\text{Z}\text{[}\text{1}\text{2}\text{]}$, $\text{Q}$ or $\text{R}$, and set $\text{A =}\text{k[x,y]}\text{(x}{}^2\text{+ y}{}^2\text{? 1)}$. We compute K₂(A) and K₃(A). Our method is to construct a map $\text{? : K}{}_1\text{(k[i])→K}{}_{\mathrm{1\; +\; 1}}\text{(A)}$ and compare this to a localization sequence.We give three applications. We show that ? accounts for the primitive elements in K₂(A), and compare our results to computations of Bloch [1] for group schemes. Secondly, we consider the problem of basepoint independence, and indicate the interplay of geometry upon the K-theory of affine schemes obtained by glueing points of Spec(A). Third, we can iterate the construction to compute the K-theory of the torus ring A ?_kA.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

A generalization of Lavoie's inequality concerning the sum of idempotent matrices

Let a complex pxn matrix A be partitioned as A′=(A′₁,A′₂,…,A′_k). Denote by ?(A), A′, and A^? respectively the rank of A, the transpose of A, and an inner inverse (or a g-inverse) of A. Let A⁽¹⁴⁾ be an inner inverse of A such that A⁽¹⁴⁾A is a Hermitian matrix. Let B=(A⁽¹⁴⁾₁,A⁽¹⁴⁾₂,…,A_k⁽¹⁴⁾) and $\text{ρ(A)=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{k}\text{ρ(A}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$.Then the product of nonzero eigenvalues of BA (or AB) cannot exceed one, and the product of nonzero eigenvalues of BA is equal to one if and only if either B=A⁽¹⁴⁾ or $\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{i>}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>j</mtext>}}{}^1\text{=0}$ for all i ≠ j,i, j=1,2,…,k . The results of Lavoie (1980) and Styan (1981) are obtained as particular cases. A result is obtained for k=2 when the condition $\text{ρ(A)=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{k}\text{ρ(A}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ is no longer true.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.