A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries

In this paper, we report on a comparison of the treatment of addition and subtraction of fractions in primary mathematics textbooks used in Cyprus, Ireland, and Taiwan. To this end, we use a framework specifically developed to investigate the learning opportunities afforded by the textbooks, particularly with respect to the presentation of the content and the textbook expectations as manifested in the associated tasks. We found several similarities and differences among the textbooks regarding the topics included and their sequencing, the constructs of fractions, the worked examples, the cognitive demands of the tasks, and the types of responses required of students. The findings emphasized the need to examine textbooks in order to understand differences in instruction and achievement across countries. Indeed, we postulate that within a given country there may exist a recognizable “textbook signature.” We also draw on the results and the challenges inherent in our analysis to provide suggestions and directions for future textbook analysis studies.     

Preservice Teachers’ Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Fraction Operations: A Comparative Study of the United States and Taiwan

This study examined (a) the differences in preservice teachers’ procedural knowledge in four areas of fraction operations in Taiwan and the United States, (b) the differences in preservice teachers’ conceptual knowledge in four areas of fraction operations in Taiwan and the United States, and (c) correlation in preservice teachers’ conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge of fractions in Taiwan and the United States. Participants were preservice teachers (N = 49) in a teacher education program in the United States and comparable Chinese preservice teachers (N = 47). Results indicated that Chinese preservice teachers performed better in procedural knowledge on fraction operations than American preservice teachers. No significant differences were found for conceptual knowledge on fraction division. Further, the correlation in this study showed that for Chinese and American preservice teachers, the relationship between conceptual and procedural knowledge of fraction operations was weak.     

Applying Mathematical Concepts with Hands‐On,Food‐Based Science Curriculum

This article addresses the current state of the mathematics education system in the United States and provides a possible solution to the contributing issues. As a result of lower performance in primary mathematics, American students are not acquiring the necessary quantitative literacy skills to become successful adults. This study analyzed the impact of the Food, Math, and Science Teaching Enhancement Resource (FoodMASTER) Intermediate curriculum on fourth‐grade students' mathematics knowledge. The curriculum is a part of the FoodMASTER Initiative, which is a compilation of programs utilizing food, a familiar and necessary part of everyday life, as a tool to teach mathematics and science. Students exposed to the curriculum completed a 20‐item researcher‐developed mathematics knowledge exam (intervention n = 288; control n = 194). Overall, the results showed a significant increase in mathematics knowledge from pretest to posttest. These findings suggest that the food‐based science activities provided the students with the context in which to apply mathematical concepts to an everyday experience. Therefore, the FoodMASTER approach was successful at improving students' mathematics knowledge while building a foundation for becoming quantitatively literate adults.     

Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: the case of fraction division

In this study, selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks were examined in terms of their ways of conceptualizing and organizing content for the teaching and learning of fraction division. Three Chinese mathematics textbook series, three Japanese textbook series, and four US textbook series were selected and examined to locate the content instruction of fraction division. Textbook organization of fraction division and other content topics were described. Further analyses were then conducted to specify how the content topic of fraction division was conceptualized and introduced. Specific attention was also given to the textbooks’ uses of content constructs including examples, representations, and exercise problems in order to show their approaches for the teaching and learning of fraction division. The results provide a glimpse of the metaphors of mathematics teaching and learning that have been employed in Chinese, Japanese, and US textbooks. In particular, the results from the textbook analyses demonstrate how conceptual underpinnings were developed while targeting procedures and operations. Implications of the study are then discussed.     

Comparing the development of the multiplication of fractions in Turkish and American textbooks

This study analyzed the methods used to teach the multiplication of fractions in Turkish and American textbooks. Two Turkish textbooks and two American textbooks, Everyday Mathematics (EM) and Connected Mathematics 3 (CM), were analyzed. The analyses focused on the content and the nature of the mathematical problems presented in the textbooks. The findings of the study showed that the American textbooks aimed at developing conceptual understanding first and then procedural fluency, whereas the Turkish textbooks aimed at developing both concurrently. The American textbooks provided more opportunities for different computational strategies. The solutions to most problems in all textbooks required a single computational step, a numerical answer, and procedural knowledge. Furthermore, compared with the Turkish textbooks, the American textbooks contained a greater number of problems that required high-level cognitive skills such as mathematical reasoning.     

From convergence to divergence: the development of mathematical problem solving in research, curriculum, and classroom practice in Singapore

Following the movement of problem solving in the US and other parts of the world in the 1980s, problem solving became the central focus of Singapore’s national school mathematics curriculum in 1990 and thereafter the key theme in research and practice. Different from some other countries, this situation has largely not changed in Singapore mathematics education since then. However, within the domain of problem solving, mathematics educators in Singapore focused more on the fundamental knowledge, basic skills, and heuristics for problem solving till the mid 1990s. In particular, problem solving heuristics, especially the so-called “model method”, a term most widely used for problem solving, received much attention in syllabus, research, and classroom instruction. Since the late 1990s, following the national vision of “Thinking Schools, Learning Nation” and nurturing modern citizens with independent, critical, and creative thinking, Singapore mathematics educators’ attention has greatly expanded to the development of students’ higher-order thinking, self-reflection and self-regulation, alternative ways of assessment and instruction, among other aspects concerning problem solving. Researchers have also looked into the advantages and disadvantages of Singapore’s textbooks in representing problem solving, and the findings of these investigations have influenced the development of the latest school mathematics textbooks.     

Mathematics-related teaching competence of Taiwanese primary future teachers: evidence from TEDS-M

This paper draws on data from the international TEDS-M study, organized by the IEA, and utilizes a conceptual framework describing the Taiwanese perspective of mathematics and mathematics teaching competences (MTCs) with regard to investigating the uniqueness and patterns of Taiwanese future primary teacher performance in the international context. The framework includes content-oriented and thought-oriented categories of mathematics competence. The latter category contains subcategories adopted and revised from (3rd Mediterranean conference on mathematical education. Hellenic Mathematical Society, Athens, 2003) the competence approach by Niss. Hsieh’s (Research on the development of the professional ability for teaching mathematics in the secondary school level (3/3). Taiwan: National Science Council, 2009) model is also adopted and revised to serve as an analytical framework, including four categories relating to MTCs, representations, language, and misconceptions or error procedures. This paper shows that in thought-oriented mathematics competences Taiwan and Singapore share a unique pattern of higher percent correct in competences related to formalization, abstraction, and operations in mathematics than in those related to the way of thinking, modelling and reasoning in and with mathematics. The paper also addresses weak teaching competences claimed in domestic studies, which conflict with the TEDS-M results. Namely, in contrary to the international trend, Taiwanese future primary teachers are weak at judging mathematics competences required by students to learn mathematical concepts or solve problems, and superior at diagnosing and dealing with student misconceptions and error procedures.     

Analyzing connections between teacher and student topic-specific knowledge of lower secondary mathematics

The interpretive cross-case study focused on the examination of connections between teacher and student topic-specific knowledge of lower secondary mathematics. Two teachers were selected for the study using non-probability purposive sampling technique. Teachers completed the Teacher Content Knowledge Survey before teaching a topic on the division of fractions. The survey consisted of multiple-choice items measuring teachers’ knowledge of facts and procedures, knowledge of concepts and connections, and knowledge of models and generalizations. Teachers were also interviewed on the topic of fraction division using questions addressing their content and pedagogical content knowledge. After teaching the topic on the division of fractions, two groups of 6th-grade students of the participating teachers were tested using similar items measuring students’ topic-specific knowledge at the level of procedures, concepts, and generalizations. The cross-case examination using meaning coding and linguistic analysis revealed topic-specific connections between teacher and student knowledge of fraction division. Results of the study suggest that students’ knowledge could be associated with the teacher knowledge in the context of topic-specific teaching and learning of mathematics at the lower secondary school.     

Alignment of Elementary Geometry Curriculum With Current Standards

The subject of geometry in the curriculum continues to be an area of concern among mathematics educators. The gap between standards expectations and actual textbook content continues to reflect the need for substantial change. In this study, the geometry language introduced in K‐6 textbooks was carefully examined and compared to the language used in the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics ( National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989 ), Principles and Standards for School Mathematics ( NCTM, 1999 ), and New Standards Elementary School Mathematics Performance Standards ( National Center for Education and the Economy, 1997 ). The. logic followed was that the language in textbooks reflects the content presented in the textbook, and the language in the standards reflects what should be presented. The results of the study clearly indicate that there is a substantial misalignment between the geometry presented in the textbooks, the. geometry expected to be taught by groups such as NCTM, and the geometry being assessed in student performance measures as suggested by NCEE. Specific areas of misalignment are identified, along with implications, and some areas in which the curriculum should be revised are identified.     

Enactment of school mathematics curriculum in Singapore: whither research!

The official curriculum for mathematics in Singapore schools is based on a framework that has mathematical problem solving as its primary goal. It is detailed and one may say that the gap between the designated curriculum and teacher intended curriculum is often very narrow. This is so as the main source of instructional materials is textbooks which are very closely aligned with the official national curriculum. There is a dearth of research on the enactment of the curriculum in Singapore schools, with the few research studies done so far appearing to cover only a narrow focus. The author’s view is that, even though only a few such studies have been published, schools have always been engaged in small-scale investigations, the findings of which are necessary to guide decisions on matters related to choice of textbooks and pedagogies for improved student learning. Considering all the published research and the investigative work undertaken by educators in Singapore, it may be said that the conceptual model proposed by Remillard and Heck is rigorous. In addition, the issues in this particular issue of ZDM offer educators, both classroom teachers and others, very good perspectives for research on the enactment of the school mathematics curriculum.     

Analysis of the role of the calculator in Brazilian textbooks

This paper presents the results of an investigation in which 48 textbooks have been analysed, to observe whether and how primary school textbooks approved by the Brazilian national textbook programme (Programa Nacional do Livro Didático—PNLD) consider the use of calculators. It has been noticed that many textbooks recommend the use of calculators in the classroom and suggest specific activities. In the PNLD teacher’s guide, only in the analysis of some textbooks is there clear information on calculator usage in the classroom. Calculator usage is mainly encouraged in the textbooks of the final years in primary school, mostly with multiplication and division, and distributed in four types of activities: conceptual development, verification of results, results calculation and calculator tool manipulation. Many textbooks have considered the recommendation to use modern technological devices to aid the learning of mathematics, while others still have to assess the value of the calculator as a valid instrument in developing mathematical knowledge.     

The Impact of Enacted Mathematics Curriculum Models on Prospective Elementary Teachers' Course Perceptions and Beliefs

This paper communicates the impact of prospective teachers' learning of mathematics using novel curriculum materials in an innovative classroom setting. Two sections of a mathematics content course for prospective elementary teachers used different text materials and instructional approaches. The primary mathematical authorities were the instructor and text in the textbook section and the prospective teachers in the curriculum materials section. After one semester, teachers in the curriculum materials section (n= 34) placed significantly more importance on classroom group work and discussions, less on instructor lecture and explanation, and less on textbooks having practice problems, examples, and explanations. They valued student exploration over practice. In the textbook section (n= 19), there was little change in the teachers' beliefs, in which practice was valued over exploration. These results highlight the positive impact of experiences with innovative curriculum materials on prospective elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics instruction.     

Trends in the evolution of models & modeling perspectives on mathematical learning and problem solving

In this paper we briefly outline the models and modelling (M&M) perspective of mathematical thinking and learning relevant for the 21st century. Models and modeling (M&M) research often investigates the nature of understandings and abilities that are needed in order for students to be able to use what they have (presumably) learned in the classroom in “real life” situations beyond school Nonetheless, M&M perspectives evolved out of research on concept development more than research on problem solving; and, rather than being preoccupied with the kind of word problems emphasized in textbooks and standardized tests, we focus on (simulations of) problem solving “in the wild.” Also, we give special attention to the fact that, in a technology-basedage of information, significant changes are occurring in the kinds of “mathematical thinking” that is coming to be needed in the everyday lives of ordinary people in the 21^st century—as well as in the lives of productive people in future-oriented fields that are heavy users of mathematics, science, and technology.     

The development of school mathematics textbooks in China since 1950

This paper provides an account of the development of school mathematics textbooks in China since 1950, the year following the founding of the People’s Republic. This development can be divided into several major periods consisting of (a) translating and modifying textbooks from the Soviet Union, (b) writing and editing unified textbooks, and (c) developing multiple versions of textbooks under curriculum standards that emphasize students’ personal development. Over the last 60 years, there have been many changes in the structure and content of developed textbooks; textbooks from each period exhibit their own characteristics which relate to specific political and cultural conditions. The debates on reform of compilation principles and of textbook structure and content still intertwine within the development of school mathematics textbooks. This development has resulted in the launching of a cross-national comparative study on mathematics textbooks in China which is intended to promote the development of mathematics textbooks considering cross-national perspectives.     

Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: two contrasted case studies in France and Norway

This paper reports on an investigation of mathematics curriculum documents, commonly used textbooks and teacher ‘curricular practice’ with respect to educational traditions in France and Norway. The study has helped to develop a deeper understanding of (1) educational traditions in France and Norway; (2) the ways the educational traditions permeate the system, from policy documents through textbooks into the classroom; and (3) the connections between the worlds of policy, textbooks and teacher curricular practice in mathematics. Results show that French and Norwegian curricular documents and practices were influenced by egalitarian values, albeit differently interpreted and ‘lived’ in each country. In terms of mathematics, using a focus on grade 6 geometric transformations has shown that French textbooks and teacher curricular practices emphasized theoretical properties and mathematical reasoning, whereas the Norwegian counterparts stressed practical and inquiry-based activities. It is argued that mathematics textbooks can be regarded as a crucial interface between culture, policy and curricular practice, and as a pivotal resource in teachers’ resource system for curricular practice, even in times of digitization.     

A comparative analysis of British and Taiwanese students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of fraction addition

This study examines students’ procedural and conceptual achievement in fraction addition in England and Taiwan. A total of 1209 participants (561 British students and 648 Taiwanese students) at ages 12 and 13 were recruited from England and Taiwan to take part in the study. A quantitative design by means of a self-designed written test is adopted as central to the methodological considerations. The test has two major parts: the concept part and the skill part. The former is concerned with students’ conceptual knowledge of fraction addition and the latter is interested in students’ procedural competence when adding fractions.

There were statistically significant differences both in concept and skill parts between the British and Taiwanese groups with the latter having a higher score. The analysis of the students’ responses to the skill section indicates that the superiority of Taiwanese students’ procedural achievements over those of their British peers is because most of the former are able to apply algorithms to adding fractions far more successfully than the latter. Earlier, Hart [1 Hart KM. Children's understanding of mathematics: 11–16. Oxford: Alden Press; 1981. [Google Scholar]] reported that around 30% of the British students in their study used an erroneous strategy (adding tops and bottoms, for example, 2/3 + 1/7 = 3/10) while adding fractions. This study also finds that nearly the same percentage of the British group remained using this erroneous strategy to add fractions as Hart found in 1981.

The study also provides evidence to show that students’ understanding of fractions is confused and incomplete, even those who are successfully able to perform operations. More research is needed to be done to help students make sense of the operations and eventually attain computational competence with meaningful grounding in the domain of fractions.     

A cross-national comparison of reform curricula in Korea and the US in terms of cognitive complexity: the case of fraction addition and subtraction

The overall level of conceptual understanding and mathematical proficiency of students has been a matter of increasing national interest in South Korea. Recently, a new edition of mathematics textbooks aligned with the amendment of the 7th national mathematics curriculum has become available for all elementary grade levels. To characterize the current reform efforts in South Korea, this study examined the quality of the mathematical problems in the current version of the Korean reform textbooks (KM 2) compared with the previous version (KM 1) and one representative US reform curriculum text (EM). Webb’s (Research monograph No. 18: Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. National Institute for Science Education, Madison, 1999) depth of knowledge framework and Son and Senk’s (Educ Stud Math 74(2):117–142, 2010) cognitive expectation feature were employed to examine the kind and level of students’ opportunities to learn along with the type of word problems presented in the three sets of materials. Analysis revealed that the KM 2 provided better opportunities for students to learn fraction addition and subtraction than the KM 1 in terms of the depth and breadth of cognitive complexity. However, there was little difference in addressing and developing the meaning of fraction addition and subtraction through word problems. Moreover, compared with the US reform curriculum materials, the KM 2 provided more problems requiring lower depth of knowledge levels than the US counterpart. Implications of these findings for curriculum developers, textbook and learning materials developers, teachers and future researchers are discussed.     

The quality of non-textual elements in mathematics textbooks: an exploratory comparison between South Korea and the United States

As an exploratory investigation, this study aims to analyze non-textual elements in some Korean and US mathematics textbooks using a conceptual framework whose components include accuracy, connectivity, contextuality, and conciseness. By analyzing three US textbooks and three Korean ones, the study not only shows patterns in the use of non-textual elements in mathematics textbooks in different contexts but also provides insights into how to assess the quality of non-textual elements in mathematics textbooks, which I hope will contribute to the provision of more meaningful and productive learning opportunities to school children. Overall, the results from this study show that there is significant difference across topics and textbooks, which implies different opportunities to learn through non-textual elements. This study makes a unique contribution to the conceptualization of non-textual elements in mathematics education and has implications for textbook analysis and curriculum development.     

The structures of German mathematics textbooks

From a socio-cultural perspective it is argued that the modality of artefacts has, structuring effects on the activities in which the artefact is involved. The mathematics textbook is an artefact that has a major influence on the activity of learning mathematics. Against this setting, the structures of the units in German mathematics textbooks for different grades and ability levels have been analysed. Firstly, the different structural elements have been examined with regard to: characteristics in terms of content; linguistic characteristics; visual characteristics; their pedagogical functions within the learning process; and situative conditions. Secondly, the orders of the structural elements within the units of the different textbooks have been compared. The findings reveal that the structure of the units is very similar in different mathematics textbooks. The units are not only composed of analogous structural elements, but these elements are also arranged in almost the same sequence. In order to develop a deeper understanding of these findings the structure of the units has been compared to the influential learning theories of J. F. Herbart and H. Roth. On this basis it is argued that the structure of the units seems to reflect the phases of idealised learning processes in general. The issue is raised if this is an appropriate structure in order to provide opportunities to learn mathematics.     

Preparing K‐8 Preservice Teachers in a Content Course for Standards‐Based Mathematics Pedagogy

Many K–8 preservice teachers have not experienced learning mathematics in a standards‐based classroom. This article describes a mathematics content course designed to provide preservice teachers experiences in learning mathematics that will help build a solid foundation for a standards‐based methods course. The content course focuses on developing preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge, as well as helping them realize what it means to learn mathematics that is taught using the pedagogy in the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics ( National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000 ). Furthermore, findings are presented from a study on this course that describe students' pre‐ and postcourse beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions of what it means to learn and teach mathematics. These findings provide evidence that the students in the study are beginning to understand what is meant by a standards‐based classroom. Data were collected from surveys and interviews. Quotes from the students who aspire to be elementary teachers are used throughout the article to support the points.