SiH4与HX(X=F,Cl,Br,I)形成的二氢键复合物的结构特征及本质

本文就SiH4与HX形成的二氢键复合物的结构特征及本质进行了探讨。在MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平优化、频率验证得到复合物的分子结构,通过分子间距离及电子密度等值线图,我们确认SiH4与卤化氢已形成了二氢键复合物。MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平下进行BSSE校正后的结合能为2.703－4.439 KJ/mol。用对称匹配微绕理论(SAPT)对结合能进行分解,分解结果显示,SiH4匟X(X=F,Cl,Br,I)二氢键复合物中静电能对总吸引能的贡献小于28％,并且相对稳定,这就是说SiH4匟X二氢键复合物的本质并非静电作用,而是静电能、诱导能、色散能、交换能对总结合能的贡献都非常重要。     

SiH4与HX(X=F,Cl,Br,I)形成的二氢键复合物的结构特性及本质

对SiH4与HX形成的二氢键复合物的结构特征及本质进行了探讨.在MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平优化、频率验证得到复合物的分子结构,通过分子间距离及电子密度等值线图,确认SiH4与卤化氢已形成了二氢键复合物.MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平下进行BSSE校正后的结合能为2.703～4.439 kJ/mol.用对称匹配微扰理论对结合能进行分解,分解结果显示,SiH4…HX(X=F,Cl,Br,I)二氢键复合物中静电能对总吸引能的贡献小于28%,并且相对稳定.这就是说SiH4…HX二氢键复合物的本质并非静电作用.而是静电能、诱导能、色散能、交换能对总结合能的贡献都非常重要.     

BeH2与HX(X=F,Cl, Br,I)形成的二氢键复合物的结构特征与本质

对BeH2与HX(X=F, Cl, Br, I)形成的二氢键复合物的结构特征及本质进行了探讨. 在MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平优化、频率验证, 得到复合物的分子结构, 用分子间距离及电子密度拓扑理论确认BeH2与卤化氢已形成了二氢键型复合物. 在MP2/6-311++G(3d, 3p)水平下进行基函数重叠误差(BSSE)校正后的结合能在-14.468 kJ·mol-1到-5.464 kJ·mol-1之间.用对称匹配微扰理论(SAPT)对复合物的结合能进行分解, 结果表明, BeH2…HX二氢键复合物中静电能对总吸引能的贡献都是最主要的, 但交换排斥能、诱导能、色散能对总结合能的贡献也很重要. 从BeH2…HF到BeH2…HI, 诱导能对总吸引能的贡献从37.8%逐渐减小到24.0%. 而色散能对总吸引能的贡献从BeH2…HF体系中的16.0%逐渐增加到BeH2…HI体系中的33.8%.     

GeH4与HX(X＝F,Cl,Br)间二氢键复合物的理论研究

对GeH4与HX形成的二氢键复合物的结构特征及本质进行了探讨.在MP2/6-311 ++G(3 d,3p)水平优化、频率验证得到复合物的分子结构,通过分子的几何参数及电子密度拓扑分析,确认GeH4与卤化氢已形成了二氢键复合物.MP2/6-311 ++ G(3d,3p)水平下进行BSSE校正后的结合能为3.281到4.5...     

卤化氢HX（X=F,Cl,Br,I）与C2H2相互作用本质的量子化学研究

在MP2水平上,采用全电子基组,对C2H2与HX(X=F,Cl,Br,I)相互作用进行了研究.构型优化同时进行频率验证,得到4个T型结构的稳定复合物,相互作用能在-12.761～-7.086kJ/mol之间.自然键轨道(NBO)与分子中的原子(AIM)理论分析表明,形成复合物分子间的电荷转移量都很少,最大仅为0.009a.u.,作用强度与氢键类似.对称性匹配微拢理论(SAPT)能量分解数据表明,对于C2H2…HX(X=F,Cl,Br,I)体系,从F到I,静电作用逐渐减弱,色散作用逐渐增强;相互作用能中对吸引能的贡献主要为静电能和色散能,二者之和占到80%以上,诱导能所占的比例很小,卤化氢与乙炔分子间相互作用的本质为静电作用和色散作用.     

同核双卤分子X2(X=F,CI,Br,I)与C2H2相互作用本质的量子化学研究

用对称性匹配微扰理论(SAPT)对C2H2与X2(X=F,CI,Br,I)相互作用进行了量子化学研究.优化所得的4个稳定复合物相互作用能在-3.276 8～-10.639 5 kJ/mol之间.自然键轨道(NBO)理论分析表明,形成复合物分子间的电荷转移量都很少,在0.002 3～0.013 2之间.SAPT2能量分析显示,从F到I,静电能和诱导能先增大后减小,交换能和色散能逐渐增强,相互作用能依次增强.复合物稳定构型的相互作用能中静电能占主导作用,对吸引能的贡献比例在C2H2…F2中最大(57.3％),在C2H2…I2中最小(49.7％);其次为色散能,在吸引能中所占的比例在21.9％(C2H2…F2)～31.2％(C2H2…I2)之间;诱导能在吸引能中所占的比例最小,均小于20.7％.     

吡咯与HX(X=F,Cl,Br)分子间多种氢键的电子密度拓扑研究

采用密度泛函B3LYP/6-311＋＋G(d,p)方法, 对吡咯与HX (X＝F, Cl, Br)形成的经典氢键和π型氢键, 从其几何参数、电子密度的拓扑性质和电子积分等方面进行了研究. 在对π型氢键的讨论中我们将π电子与σ电子分离, 得到了π型氢键体系的π电子的密度等值线和拉普拉斯量等值线图以及各原子的π电子积分, 形象地说明了π型氢键的作用本质.     

SiH_4与AB型卤素互化物之间的反转氢键

采用从头算方法对SiH4与AB型卤素互化物(ClF、BrF、IF、ICl、IBr、BrCl)形成的复合物的结构特征及本质进行了探讨.在MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平上优化复合物的分子结构,并进行频率验证.通过分子间距离、自然键轨道(NBO)净电荷迁移数及分子图,确认SiH4与卤素互化物形成反转氢键型复合物.在MP2/6-311++G(3d,3p)水平上进行基组重叠误差(BSSE)校正后的作用能为-5.113--9.468kJ·mol-1.用对称匹配微扰理论(SAPT)对作用能进行分解,结果显示,诱导能对总吸引能的贡献在55.0%到72.2%之间,是最主要的贡献部分,静电能和色散能对总吸引能的贡献都小于25.0%.     

传统氢键(X—H…Y)还是X—H…π相互作用？ ——无机苯与卤化氢相互作用本质的量子化学研究

在MP2/6-311＋＋G**水平对无机苯(B3N3H6)与卤化氢HX (X＝F, Cl, Br, I)相互作用体系进行了系统研究. 结果表明在B3N3H6-HX (X＝F, Cl, Br, I)体系的平衡几何结构中, HX的H原子倾向于指向B3N3H6环上的N原子, 且从HF到HI相互作用强度依次减弱. 与苯-卤化氢体系比较, 除与HF相互作用B3N3H6较C6H6强外, 其余体系B3N3H6均较C6H6弱(结合能数值相差4 kJ/mol左右). 对称匹配微扰理论(SAPT)能量分解结果说明静电、诱导和色散力对描述B3N3H6-卤化氢体系的相互作用都很重要, 从HF到HI静电能占总吸引作用能的百分比逐渐减少, 色散能占总吸引作用能的百分比逐渐增加, 这种变化趋势与苯-卤化氢体系比较类似, 表明B3N3H6与卤化氢的相互作用随着卤素原子序数的递增, 传统氢键作用趋势减弱, X—H…π相互作用趋势增强.     

苯-卤素(X2, X=F, Cl, Br, I)相互作用本质的对称性匹配微扰理论研究

在MP2水平下对被定义为"电荷转移复合物(CTC)"的苯(C6H6)-卤素分子X2(X＝F, Cl, Br, I)相互作用体系进行了量子化学研究. 在优化所得C6H6-X2(X＝F, Cl, Br, I)复合物的平衡几何结构中, 卤素分子X2接近垂直指向苯环上碳-碳双键的中心. 自然键轨道(NBO)分析结果表明, 苯-卤素体系中电荷转移的数量很少. 对称性匹配微扰理论(Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory, SAPT) 能量分解结果显示, 在4个复合物体系中, 静电作用的贡献相对较小(只占总吸引作用的20%左右), 对于C6H6-F2体系, 色散作用是其主要吸引作用, 对于C6H6-Cl2, C6H6-Br2和C6H6-I2 体系, 诱导作用则是其主要的吸引作用, 从F到I, 色散作用逐渐减弱, 诱导作用逐渐增强, 表明在电子相关水平上将苯-卤素体系称为"电荷转移复合物"的说法并不确切.     

Nature of Alkali- and Coinage-Metal Bonds versus Hydrogen Bonds

We have quantum chemically studied the structure and nature of alkali- and coinage-metal bonds (M-bonds) versus that of hydrogen bonds between A−M and B⁻ in archetypal [A−M⋅⋅⋅B]⁻ model systems (A, B=F, Cl and M=H, Li, Na, Cu, Ag, Au), using relativistic density functional theory at ZORA-BP86-D3/TZ2P. We find that coinage-metal bonds are stronger than alkali-metal bonds which are stronger than the corresponding hydrogen bonds. Our main purpose is to understand how and why the structure, stability and nature of such bonds are affected if the monovalent central atom H of hydrogen bonds is replaced by an isoelectronic alkali- or coinage-metal atom. To this end, we have analyzed the bonds between A−M and B⁻ using the activation strain model, quantitative Kohn-Sham molecular orbital (MO) theory, energy decomposition analysis (EDA), and Voronoi deformation density (VDD) analysis of the charge distribution.     

Phase Equilibria of Hydrogen Bonding Fluid in a Slit Pore with Broken Symmetry

Phase equilibria of hydrogen bonding (HB) fluid confined in a slit pore with broken symmetry were investigated by the density functional theory incorporated with modified fundamental measure theory, where the symmetry breaking originated from the distinct interactions between fluid molecules and two walls of the slit pore. In terms of adsorption-desorption isotherms and the corresponding grand potentials, phase diagrams of HB fluid under various conditions are presented. Furthermore, through phase coexistences of laying transition and capillary condensation, the effects of HB interaction, pore width, fluid-pore interaction and the broken symmetry on the phase equilibrium properties are addressed. It is shown that these factors can give rise to apparent influences on the phase equilibria of confined HB fluid because of the competition between intermolecular interaction and fluid-pore interaction. Interestingly, a significant influence of broken symmetry of the slit pore is found, and thus the symmetry breaking can provide a new way to regulate the phase behavior of various confined fluids.     

Assessing the Accuracy of SAPT(DFT) Interaction Energies by Comparison with Experimentally Derived Noble Gas Potentials and Molecular Crystal Lattice Energies

The density functional version of symmetry‐adapted perturbation theory, SAPT(DFT), is a computationally efficient method for calculating intermolecular interaction energies. We evaluate its accuracy by comparison with experimentally determined noble gas interaction potentials and sublimation enthalpies, most of which have not been previously calculated using this method. In order to compare the results with wavefunction methods, we also calculate these quantities using MP2 and, for noble gas dimers, using CCSD(T). For the crystal lattice energy calculations, we include corrections to the dispersion, electrostatic, and induction energies that account for the finite interaction distance cutoff and higher‐order induction contributions. Overall, the energy values extrapolated to the complete basis set limit show that SAPT(DFT) achieves significantly better agreement with experiment than MP2.     

Nature of the Hydrogen Bond Enhanced Halogen Bond

The factors responsible for the enhancement of the halogen bond by an adjacent hydrogen bond have been quantitatively explored by means of state-of-the-art computational methods. It is found that the strength of a halogen bond is enhanced by ca. 3 kcal/mol when the halogen donor simultaneously operates as a halogen bond donor and a hydrogen bond acceptor. This enhancement is the result of both stronger electrostatic and orbital interactions between the XB donor and the XB acceptor, which indicates a significant degree of covalency in these halogen bonds. In addition, the halogen bond strength can be easily tuned by modifying the electron density of the aryl group of the XB donor as well as the acidity of the hydrogen atoms responsible for the hydrogen bond.     

Theoretical study on the interactions of halogen‐bonds and pnicogen‐bonds in phosphine derivatives with Br2, BrCl,and BrF

The MP2 ab initio quantum chemistry methods were utilized to study the halogen‐bond and pnicogen‐bond system formed between PH₂X (X = Br, CH₃, OH, CN, NO₂, CF₃) and BrY (Y = Br, Cl, F). Calculated results show that all substituent can form halogen‐bond complexes while part substituent can form pnicogen‐bond complexes. Traditional, chlorine‐shared and ion‐pair halogen‐bonds complexes have been found with the different substituent X and Y. The halogen‐bonds are stronger than the related pnicogen‐bonds. For halogen‐bonds, strongly electronegative substituents which are connected to the Lewis acid can strengthen the bonds and significantly influenced the structures and properties of the compounds. In contrast, the substituents which connected to the Lewis bases can produce opposite effects. The interaction energies of halogen‐bonds are 2.56 to 32.06 kcal·mol^?1; The strongest halogen‐bond was found in the complex of PH₂OH???BrF. The interaction energies of pnicogen‐bonds are in the range 1.20 to 2.28 kcal·mol^?1; the strongest pnicogen‐bond was found in PH₂Br???Br₂ complex. The charge transfer of lp(P) ? σ*(Br? Y), lp(F) ? σ*(Br? P), and lp(Br) ? σ*(X? P) play important roles in the formation of the halogen‐bonds and pnicogen‐bonds, which lead to polarization of the monomers. The polarization caused by the halogen‐bond is more obvious than that by the pnicogen‐bond, resulting in that some halogen‐bonds having little covalent character. The symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) energy decomposition analysis showes that the halogen‐bond and pnicogen‐bond interactions are predominantly electrostatic and dispersion, respectively.