Enabling the Practice of Mathematics Teachers in Context: Toward a New Equity Research Agenda

In this article, I address the need for a more clearly articulated research agenda around equity issues by proposing a working definition of equity and a focal point for research. More specifically, I assert that rather than pitting them against each other, we must coordinate (a) efforts to get marginalized students to master what currently counts as "dominant" mathematics with (b) efforts to develop a critical perspective among all students about knowledge and society in ways that ultimately facilitate (c) a positive relationship between mathematics, people, and equity on the planet. I make this argument partly by reviewing the literature on (school) contexts that engage marginalized students in mathematics. Then, I argue that the place that holds the most promise for addressing equity is a research agenda that emphasizes enabling the practice of teachers and that draws more heavily on design-based and action research, thereby redefining what the practice of mathematics means along the way. Specific research questions are offered.     

Students' Critical Awareness of Voice and Agency in Mathematics Classroom Discourse

This account of my extended conversation with a high school mathematics class focuses on voice and agency. As an investigation of possibilities opened up by introducing mathematics students to what Fairclough (1992) called “critical language awareness” (p. 2), I prompted the students daily to become ever more aware of their language practices in class. The tensions in this conversation proved parallel to the tension in mathematics between individual initiative and convention, a tension that Pickering (1995) called the “dance of agency” (p. 21). Participant students in this classroom-based research resisted the idea of linguistic reference to human agency, although their actual language practice revealed some recognition of human agency.     

Research,Reform, and Equity in U.S. Mathematics Education

This article discusses mathematics education research in relation to equity and current U.S. reforms. Although mathematics education researchers and reformers give attention to equity, work in this area tends to ignore relevant social and cultural issues. I begin by surveying articles on equity published in recent, mainstream education journals, highlighting the lack of attention given to social class and ethnicity. I discuss the implications of this limited research base. Specifically, I argue that current mathematics education reforms have been shaped by good intentions and existing research, neither of which offers adequate guidance to address the complexities of equity in mathematics classrooms today. Drawing from a study of social class differences in students' experiences in one reform-oriented classroom, I discuss the challenges and dilemmas inherent in sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education and their potential contributions. I call for research from a sociocultural perspective, focusing on ways in which students from underrepresented groups can struggle when encountering particular instructional approaches, and ways in which teachers and students are able to address such struggles.     

Research, Reform, and Equity in U.S. Mathematics Education

This article discusses mathematics education research in relation to equity and current U.S. reforms. Although mathematics education researchers and reformers give attention to equity, work in this area tends to ignore relevant social and cultural issues. I begin by surveying articles on equity published in recent, mainstream education journals, highlighting the lack of attention given to social class and ethnicity. I discuss the implications of this limited research base. Specifically, I argue that current mathematics education reforms have been shaped by good intentions and existing research, neither of which offers adequate guidance to address the complexities of equity in mathematics classrooms today. Drawing from a study of social class differences in students' experiences in one reform-oriented classroom, I discuss the challenges and dilemmas inherent in sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education and their potential contributions. I call for research from a sociocultural perspective, focusing on ways in which students from underrepresented groups can struggle when encountering particular instructional approaches, and ways in which teachers and students are able to address such struggles.     

How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics

This article deals with the role that so-called emergent models can play in the process of constituting formal mathematics. The underlying philosophy is that formal mathematics is something that is, or should be, constituted by the students themselves. In the instructional design theory for realistic mathematics education, models always have been employed to foster a process in which formal mathematics is reinvented by the students themselves. This article describes how the use of models became more and more explicated over time and developed into the notion of emergent models. The design of an instructional sequence, which deals with flexible mental computation strategies for addition and subtraction up to 100, is taken as an instance for elaborating what is meant by emergent models and what role they play in fostering the constitution of formal mathematics. The analysis shows that there are 3 interrelated processes. First. at a more holistic level, there is a global transition in which “the model” initially emerges as a model of informal mathematical activity and then gradually develops into a model for more formal mathematical reasoning. Second, the transition from “model of” to “model for” involves the constitution of anew mathematical reality that can be denoted formal in relation to the original starting points of the students. Third, in the series of instructional activities, there is not 1 model, but the model actually is shaped as a series of signs, in which each new sign comes to signify activity with a previous sign in a chain of signification.     

Theories in practice: mathematics teaching and mathematics teacher education

Whilst research on the teaching of mathematics and the preparation of teachers of mathematics has been of major concern in our field for some decades, one can see a proliferation of such studies and of theories in relation to that work in recent years. This article is a reaction to the other papers in this special issue but I attempt, at the same time, to offer a different perspective. I examine first the theories of learning that are either explicitly or implicitly presented, noting the need for such theories in relation to teacher learning, separating them into: socio-cultural theories; Piagetian theory; and learning from practice. I go on to discuss the role of social and individual perspectives in authors’ approach. In the final section I consider the nature of the knowledge labelled as mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT). I suggest that there is an implied telos about ‘good teaching’ in much of our research and that perhaps the challenge is to study what happens in practice and offer multiple stories of that practice in the spirit of “wild profusion” (Lather in Getting lost: Feminist efforts towards a double(d) science. SUNY Press, New York, 2007).     

Research, practice, uncertainty and responsibility

Three issues concerning the relationship between research and practice are addressed. (1) A certain ‘prototype mathematics classroom’ seems to dominate the research field, which in many cases seems selective with respect to what practices to address. I suggest challenging the dominance of the discourse created around the prototype mathematics classroom. (2) I find it important to broaden the school-centred discourse on mathematics education and to address the very different out-of-school practices that include mathematics. Many of these practices are relevant for interpreting what is taking place in a school context. That brings us to (3) socio-political issues of mathematics education. When the different school-sites for learning mathematics as well as the many different practices that include mathematics are related, we enter the socio-political dimension of mathematics education.On the one hand we must consider questions like: Could socio-political discrimination be acted out through mathematics education? Could mathematics education exercise a regimentation and disciplining of students? Could it include discrimination in terms of language? Could it include sexism and racism? On the other hand: Could mathematics education bring about competencies which can be described as empowering, and as supporting the development of mathematical literary or a ‘mathemacy’, important for the development of critical citizenship?However, there is no hope for identifying a one-way route to mathemacy. More generally: There is no simple way of identifying the socio-political functions of mathematics education. Mathematics education has to face uncertainty, and this challenge brings us to the notion of responsibility.     

Toward the problem-centered classroom: trends in mathematical problem solving in Japan

In this paper, I summarize the influence of mathematical problem solving on mathematics education in Japan. During the 1980–1990s, many studies had been conducted under the title of problem solving, and, therefore, even until now, the curriculum, textbook, evaluation and teaching have been changing. Considering these, it is possible to identify several influences. They include that mathematical problem solving helped to (1) enable the deepening and widening of our knowledge of the students’ processes of thinking and learning mathematics, (2) stimulate our efforts to develop materials and effective ways of organizing lessons with problem solving, and (3) provide a powerful means of assessing students’ thinking and attitude. Before 1980, we had a history of both research and practice, based on the importance of mathematical thinking. This culture of mathematical thinking in Japanese mathematics education is the foundation of these influences.     

Mathematics capital in the educational field: Bourdieu and beyond

Mathematics education needs a better appreciation of the dominant power structures in the educational field: Bourdieu's theory of capital provides a good starting point. We argue from Bourdieu's perspective that school mathematics provides capital that is finely tuned to generationally reproduce the social structures that serve to keep the powerful in power, while ensuring that less powerful groups are led to accept their own failure in mathematics. Bourdieu's perspective thereby highlights theoretical inadequacies in much mathematics education research, insofar as it presumes a consensus about a ‘what works agenda’ for improving achievement for all. Drawing on one case where we manufactured awkward facts, we illustrate a Bourdieusian interpretation of mathematics capital as reproductive, and the crucial role of its cultural arbitrary. We then criticise the Bourdieusian concept of ‘mathematical capital’ as the value of mathematical competence in practice and propose to extend his tools to include the contradictory ‘use’ and ‘exchange’ values of mathematics instead: we will show how this conceptualisation goes ‘beyond Bourdieu’ and helps explain how teaching-learning might (ideally) produce ‘cultural use value’ in mathematical competence, while still recognising the contradictions teachers and learners face. Finally, we suggest how critical education research generally can benefit from this theoretical framework: (1) in exposing the interest of the dominant classes; but also (2) in researching critical pedagogic alternatives that challenge orthodoxy in educational policy and practice both in mathematics education and more generally.     

Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education

This article focuses on a form of instructional design that is deemed fitting for reform mathematics education. Reform mathematics education requires instruction that helps students in developing their current ways of reasoning into more sophisticated ways of mathematical reasoning. This implies that there has to be ample room for teachers to adjust their instruction to the students' thinking. But, the point of departure is that if justice is to be done to the input of the students and their ideas built on, a well-founded plan is needed. Design research on an instructional sequence on addition and subtraction up to 100 is taken as an instance to elucidate how the theory for realistic mathematics education (RME) can be used to develop a local instruction theory that can function as such a plan. Instead of offering an instructional sequence that “works,” the objective of design research is to offer teachers an empirically grounded theory on how a certain set of instructional activities can work. The example of addition and subtraction up to 100 is used to clarify how a local instruction theory informs teachers about learning goals, instructional activities, student thinking and learning, and the role of tools and imagery.     

Examining preservice teachers’ noticing of equity-based teaching practices to empower students engaging in productive struggle

Our study examined ways preservice teachers (PSTs) make connections between teaching practices and use of student resources that support productive struggle and promote equity. Our research questions are: (1) How do PSTs notice and describe the equity-based mathematics teaching practice of leveraging student resources to support student struggles? and (2) In what ways do PSTs make connections to and interpret the role student resources play in the resolution of students’ mathematical struggles? The qualitative study examined 39 PSTs in a mathematics content course for PSTs. Data come from a video analysis assignment where PSTs described their mathematical interpretations of the student struggle(s) and teacher’s use of student resources to support the struggle resolution. Findings show that PSTs noticed teacher moves that leveraged student’s mathematical thinking and linguistic funds of knowledge and based the productive level of the struggle on actions built upon peers, linguistic knowledge and prior mathematical knowledge.     

Old Math, New Math: Parents' Experiences with Standards-Based Reform

We focus on how African American parents in a low-income neighborhood experience, interpret, and respond to current reform efforts as implemented in their children's school. As part of a larger project on parent-child numeracy connections in an elementary school, we interviewed 10 parents and held 2 focus group meetings, during which parents shared their experiences with mathematics as students themselves and as parents of children using a Standards-based curriculum. Even though parents saw themselves as critical players in their children's learning, we found that the implementation of reform-oriented curriculum tended to disempower parents with respect to school mathematics. Parents had little understanding of the reform-based approaches, and thus limited access to the discourse of reform. Our findings call for examination of the effect that reforms have on parents, particularly when the current educational climate calls for increased parent participation and involvement.

If an 8 year old can do it, I know I can do it. I was like—wait a minute, he's the kid and I'm the parent, and he knows and I don't know. He had got upset one day and said, “Mom, you're going to make me get a bad grade. That's not right. That's not right. That's wrong.”—Shanice, mother of three     

Conceptions of mathematics and student identity: implications for engineering education

Lecturers of first-year mathematics often have reason to believe that students enter university studies with naïve conceptions of mathematics and that more mature conceptions need to be developed in the classroom. Students’ conceptions of the nature and role of mathematics in current and future studies as well as future career are pedagogically important as they can impact on student learning and have the potential to influence how and what we teach. As part of ongoing longitudinal research into the experience of a cohort of students registered at the author's institution, students’ conceptions of mathematics were determined using a coding scheme developed elsewhere. In this article, I discuss how the cohort of students choosing to study engineering exhibits a view of mathematics as conceptual skill and as problem-solving, coherent with an accurate understanding of the role of mathematics in engineering. Parallel investigation shows, however, that the students do not embody designated identities as engineers.     

Geometry,groceries, and gardens: Learning mathematics and social justice through a nested,equity-directed instructional approach

We addressed the call for explorations of how BIPOC students’ “experiences in secondary mathematics classrooms might advance transformative, equity-focused, pedagogical models” (Joseph et al., 2019, p. 149) by exploring how a nested, equity-directed approach created different kinds of opportunities for students to take up, shift, or resist what it means to teach, learn, and do mathematics. Specifically, we looked at efforts to engage equity-directed dominant and critical approaches through a series of three mathematics projects aimed at investigating food insecurity as a social (in)justice issue using geometry. Our analysis focused on a subset of data generated during three projects from different times of the year. Findings revealed that the teacher more readily enacted critical equity-directed practices than dominant ones; that students more readily embraced those critical practices; and that students expected their use of mathematics and exploration of social issues to align with authentic, real-world situations.     

Proof in School Mathematics: Insights from Psychological Research into Students' Ability for Deductive Reasoning

There are currently increased efforts to make proof central to school mathematics throughout the grades. Yet, realizing this goal is challenging because it requires that students master several abilities. In this article we focus on one such ability, namely, the ability for deductive reasoning, and we review psychological research to enhance what is currently known in mathematics education research about this ability in the context of proof and to identify important directions for future research. We first offer a conceptualization of proof, which we use to delineate our focus on deductive reasoning. We then review psychological research on the development of students' ability for deductive reasoning to see what can be said about the ages at which students become able to engage in certain forms of deductive reasoning. Finally, we review two psychological theories of deductive reasoning to offer insights into cognitively guided ways to enhance students' ability for deductive reasoning in the context of proof.     

Proof in School Mathematics: Insights from Psychological Research into Students' Ability for Deductive Reasoning

There are currently increased efforts to make proof central to school mathematics throughout the grades. Yet, realizing this goal is challenging because it requires that students master several abilities. In this article we focus on one such ability, namely, the ability for deductive reasoning, and we review psychological research to enhance what is currently known in mathematics education research about this ability in the context of proof and to identify important directions for future research. We first offer a conceptualization of proof, which we use to delineate our focus on deductive reasoning. We then review psychological research on the development of students' ability for deductive reasoning to see what can be said about the ages at which students become able to engage in certain forms of deductive reasoning. Finally, we review two psychological theories of deductive reasoning to offer insights into cognitively guided ways to enhance students' ability for deductive reasoning in the context of proof.     

Standards for professionalization of mathematics teachers: policy, curricula, and national teacher employment test in Korea

International comparative studies such as the Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) indicate that Korean students have consistently performed well. In addition, a recent study titled Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) compared prospective teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about teaching and learning in six participant countries, reporting that Korean prospective secondary mathematics teachers were better prepared than those in other countries. In this context, this study has examined the curricula for mathematics teacher education and teacher employment tests in order to investigate the social expectation for teacher professionalization in Korea, particularly focusing on teacher knowledge. The analysis shows that while elementary mathematics teacher education emphasizes pedagogical knowledge, the secondary mathematics education curricula are highly content knowledge oriented. However, the secondary mathematics teacher education includes various aspects of pedagogical content knowledge in its curricula and teacher employment test. This research also identifies the discourse concerning mathematics instruction for diversity and equity and the emphasis of reflective practice as the significant development of the current Korean teacher education.     

Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course

It is widely accepted by mathematics educators and mathematicians that most proof-oriented university mathematics courses are taught in a “definition-theorem-proof” format. However, there are relatively few empirical studies on what takes place during this instruction, why this instruction is used, and how it affects students’ learning. In this paper, I investigate these issues by examining a case study of one professor using this type of instruction in an introductory real analysis course. I first describe the professor’s actions in the classroom and argue that these actions are the result of the professor’s beliefs about mathematics, students, and education, as well as his knowledge of the material being covered. I then illustrate how the professor’s teaching style influenced the way that his students attempted to learn the material. Finally, I discuss the implications that the reported data have on mathematics education research.     

Paying the Price for Sugar and Spice: Shifting the Analytical Lens in Equity Research

The analytical stance taken by equity researchers in education, the methodologies employed, and the interpretations that are drawn from data all have an enormous impact on the knowledge that is produced about sources of inequality. In the 1970s and 1980s, a great deal of interest was given to the issue of women's and girls' underachievement in mathematics. This prompted numerous different research projects that investigated the extent and nature of the differences between girls' and boys' achievement and offered reasons why such disparities occurred. This work contributed to a discourse on gender and mathematics that flowed through the media channels and into schools, homes, and the workplace. In this article, I consider some of the scholarship on gender and mathematics, critically examining the findings that were produced and the influence they had. In the process, I propose a fundamental tension in research on equity, as scholars walk a fine and precarious line between lack of concern on the one hand and essentialism on the other. I argue in this article that negotiating that tension may be the most critical role for equity researchers as we move into the future.     

Instances of mathematical thinking among low attaining students in an ordinary secondary classroom

This paper is a report of a classroom research project whose aim was to find out whether low attaining 14-year-old students of mathematics would be able to think mathematically at a level higher than recall and reproduction during their ordinary classroom mathematics activities. Analysis of classroom interactive episodes revealed many instances of mathematical thinking of a kind which was not normally exploited, required or expected in their classes. Five episodes are described, comparing the students’ thinking to that usually described as “advanced.” In particular, some episodes suggest the power of a type of prompt which can be generalized as “going across the grain.”