On a problem of Katona on minimal separating systems

Let S be an n-element set. In this paper, we determine the smallest number f(n) for which there exists a family of subsets of S{A₁,A₂,…,A_f(n)} with the following property: Given any two elements x, y ∈ S (x ≠ y), there exist k, l such that A_k ∩ A_l= ?, and x ∈ A_k, y ∈ A_l. In particular it is shown that f(n)= 3 log₃n when n is a power of 3.     

On the equivalence of the Euler-Pommier operators in spaces of analytic functions

In the space A (θ) of all one-valued functions f(z) analytic in an arbitrary region G ? ? (0 ∈ G) with the topology of compact convergence, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the equivalence of the operators L ₁=α _n z ⁿ Δ ⁿ + ... + α₁ zΔ+α₀ E and L ₂= z ⁿ a _n (z)Δ ⁿ + ... + za ₁(z)Δ+a ₀(z)E, where δ: (Δ?)(z)=(f(z)-?(0))/z is the Pommier operator in A(G), n ∈ ?, α _n ∈ ?, a _k (z) ∈ A(G), 0≤k≤n, and the following condition is satisfied: Σ _j=s ^n?1 α _j+1 ∈ 0, s=0,1,...,n?1. We also prove that the operators z ^s+1Δ+β(z)E, β(z) ∈ A _R , s ∈ ?, and z ^s+1 are equivalent in the spaces A _R, 0?R?-∞, if and only if β(z) = 0.     

On the nonvanishing of homogeneous product sums

For integer n ≥ 1 let H_n = H_n(x, y, z) = Σ_{p + q + r = n}x^py^qz^r be the homogeneous product sum of weight n on three letters x, y, z. Morgan Ward conjectured that H_n ≠ 0 for all integers n, x, y, z with n > 1 and xyz ≠ 0. In support of this conjecture he proved that H_n ≠ 0 if n is even or if n + 2 is a prime number greater than 3. This paper adds considerably more evidence in support of Ward's conjecture by showing that in many cases H_n(a, b, c)¬=0 modulo 2, 4, or 16. The parity of H_n(a, b, c) is determined in all cases and, when H_n(a, b, c) is even, further congruences are given modulo 4 or 16.     

Output stabilization for a class of uncertain systems

The system

$$\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} = A\left( \cdot \right)x + B\left( \cdot \right)u,{\kern 1pt} \frac{{dy}}{{dt}} = A\left( \cdot \right)y + B\left( \cdot \right)u + D\left( {C*y - v} \right)$$

where v = C*x is an output, u = S*y is a control, A(·) ∈ R ^{n × n} , B(·) ∈ R ^{n × (n–p)}, C ∈ R ^{n × (n–p)}, and D ∈ R ^{n × (n–p)}, is considered. The elements α_ij(·) and β_ij(·) of the matrices A(·) and B(·) are arbitrary functionals satisfying the conditions

$$\mathop {\sup }\limits_{\left( \cdot \right)} |{\alpha _{ij}}\left( \cdot \right)| < \infty \left( {i,j \in 1,n} \right),\mathop {\sup }\limits_{\left( \cdot \right)} |{\beta _{ij}}\left( \cdot \right)| < \infty \left( {i \in 1,n,j \in 1,n - p} \right).$$

It is assumed that A(·) ∈ Z ₁ ∪ Z ₃ and A*(·) ∈ Z ₁ ∪ Z ₃, where Z ₁ is the class of matrices in which the first p elements of the kth superdiagonal are sign-definite and the elements above them are sufficiently small. The class Z ₃ differs from Z _t1 in that the elements between this superdiagonal and the (k + 1)th row are sufficiently small. If k > p, then the elements of the p × p square in the upper left corner of the matrix are sufficiently small as well. By using special quadratic Lyapunov functions, a matrix D for which y(t)–x(t) → 0 exponentially as t → ∞ is first found, and then a matrix S for which the vectors x(t) and y(t) have the same property is constructed.

     

Systems of dilated functions: Completeness,minimality, basisness

The completeness, minimality, and basis property in L ²[0, π] and L ^p[0, π], p ≠ 2, are considered for systems of dilated functions u _n (x) = S(nx), n ∈ N, where S is the trigonometric polynomial S(x) = Σ _k=0 ^m a _k sin(kx), a ₀ a _m ≠ 0. A series of results are presented and several unanswered questions are mentioned.     

The Folded (2<Emphasis Type="Italic">D</Emphasis> + 1)-cube and Its Uniform Posets

Let Γ denote the folded (2D + 1)-cube with vertex set X and diameter D ≥ 3. Fix x ∈ X. We first define a partial order ≤ on X as follows. For y, z ∈ X let y ≤ z whenever ?(x, y) + ?(y, z) = ?(x, z). Let R (resp. L) denote the raising matrix (resp. lowering matrix) of Γ. Next we show that there exists a certain linear dependency among RL², LRL,L²R and L for each given Q-polynomial structure of Γ. Finally, we determine whether the above linear dependency structure gives this poset a uniform structure or strongly uniform structure.     

Additive operators preserving rank-additivity on symmetry matrix spaces

We characterize the additive operators preserving rank-additivity on symmetry matrix spaces. LetS _n(F) be the space of alln×n symmetry matrices over a fieldF with 2,3 ∈F ^*, thenT is an additive injective operator preserving rank-additivity onS _n(F) if and only if there exists an invertible matrixU∈M _n(F) and an injective field homomorphism ? ofF to itself such thatT(X)=cUX ^?U^T, ?X=(x_ij)∈S_n(F) wherec∈F ^*,X ^?=(?(x _ij)). As applications, we determine the additive operators preserving minus-order onS _n(F) over the fieldF.     

Congruent elliptic curves with non-trivial Shafarevich-Tate groups: Distribution part

Given a large positive number x and a positive integer k, we denote by Qk(x) the set of congruent elliptic curves E(n): y2= z3- n2 z with positive square-free integers n x congruent to one modulo eight,having k prime factors and each prime factor congruent to one modulo four. We obtain the asymptotic formula for the number of congruent elliptic curves E(n)∈ Qk(x) with Mordell-Weil ranks zero and 2-primary part of Shafarevich-Tate groups isomorphic to(Z/2Z)2. We also get a lower bound for the number of E(n)∈ Qk(x)with Mordell-Weil ranks zero and 2-primary part of Shafarevich-Tate groups isomorphic to(Z/2Z)4. The key ingredient of the proof of these results is an independence property of residue symbols. This property roughly says that the number of positive square-free integers n x with k prime factors and residue symbols(quadratic and quartic) among its prime factors being given compatible values does not depend on the actual values.     

On the analytic continuation of a certain Dirichlet series

A Dirichlet series associated with a positive definite form of degree δ in n variables is defined by

$\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(s,p,α)}\text{=}\text{∑}\text{α∈Z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?{0}}\text{F(α)}{}^{\mathrm{?s}}\text{e(ρF(α)+〈α, α〉)}$

where ? ∈ $\text{Q}$, α ∈ $\text{Q}$ⁿ, 〈x, y〉 = x₁y₁ + ? + x_ny_n, e(a) = exp (2πia) for a ∈ $\text{R}$, and s = σ + ti is a complex number. The author proves that: (1) D_F(s, ?, α) has analytic continuation into the whole s-plane, (2) D_F(s, ?, α), ? ≠ 0, is a meromorphic function with at most a simple pole at $\text{s =}\text{n}\text{δ}$. The residue at $\text{s =}\text{n}\text{δ}$ is given explicitly. (3) ? = 0, α ? $\text{Z}$ⁿ, D_F(s, 0, α) is analytic for $\text{α>,}\text{n}\text{(δ ? 1)}$.     

Equations in finite fields with restricted solution sets. I (Character sums)

In earlier papers, for “large” (but otherwise unspecified) subsets A, B of Z _p and for h(x) ∈ Z _p [x], Gyarmati studied the solvability of the equations a + b = h(x), resp. ab = h(x) with a ∈ A, b ∈ B, x ∈ Z _p , and for large subsets A, B, C, D of Z _p Sárközy showed the solvability of the equations a + b = cd, resp. ab + 1 = cd with a ∈ A, b ∈ B, c ∈ C, d ∈ D. In this series of papers equations of this type will be studied in finite fields. In particular, in Part I of the series we will prove the necessary character sum estimates of independent interest some of which generalize earlier results.     

Some results on the annihilator graph of a commutative ring

Let R be a commutative ring. The annihilator graph of R, denoted by AG(R), is the undirected graph with all nonzero zero-divisors of R as vertex set, and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if ann _R (xy) ≠ ann _R (x) ∪ ann _R (y), where for z ∈ R, ann _R (z) = {r ∈ R: rz = 0}. In this paper, we characterize all finite commutative rings R with planar or outerplanar or ring-graph annihilator graphs. We characterize all finite commutative rings R whose annihilator graphs have clique number 1, 2 or 3. Also, we investigate some properties of the annihilator graph under the extension of R to polynomial rings and rings of fractions. For instance, we show that the graphs AG(R) and AG(T(R)) are isomorphic, where T(R) is the total quotient ring of R. Moreover, we investigate some properties of the annihilator graph of the ring of integers modulo n, where n ? 1.     

Distortion Properties of Holomorphic Functions of Several Complex Variables

Let Q(D) be a class of functions q, q(0) = 0, |q(z)| < 1 holomorphic in the Reinhardt domain D ? C ⁿ, a and b — arbitrary fixed numbers satisfying the condition — 1 ≤ b < a ≤ 1. ??(a, b; D) — the class of functions p such that p ? ??(a, b; D) iff for some q ? Q(D) and every z ? D. S*(a, b; D) — the class of functions f such that f ? S*(a, g; D) iff S^c(a, b; D) — the class of functions q such that q ? S^c(a, b; D) iff , where p ε ??(a, b; D) and K is an operator of the form for z=z₁,z₂,…z_n. The author obtains sharp bounds on |p(z)|, f(z)| g(z)| as well as sharp coefficient inequalities for functions in ??(a, b; D), S*(a, b; D) and S^c(a, b; D).     

Planar Graded Lattices and the <Emphasis Type="Bold">c</Emphasis><Subscript>1</Subscript>-Median Property

Let L be a lattice of finite length, ξ = (x ₁,…, x _k )∈L ^k , and y ∈ L. The remoteness r(y, ξ) of y from ξ is d(y, x ₁)+?+d(y, x _k ), where d stands for the minimum path length distance in the covering graph of L. Assume, in addition, that L is a graded planar lattice. We prove that whenever r(y, ξ) ≤ r(z, ξ) for all z ∈ L, then y ≤ x ₁∨?∨x _k . In other words, L satisfies the so-called c ₁ -median property.     

Functional equations and Weierstrass sigma-functions

It is proved that if an entire function f: ? → ? satisfies an equation of the form α ₁(x)β ₁(y) + α ₂(x)β ₂(y) + α ₃(x)β ₃(y), x,y ∈ C, for some α _j , β _j : ? → ? and there exist no \({\widetilde \alpha _j}\) and ?\({\widetilde \beta _j}\) for which \(f\left( {x + y} \right)f\left( {x - y} \right) = {\overline \alpha _1}\left( x \right){\widetilde \beta _1}\left( y \right) + {\overline \alpha _2}\left( x \right){\widetilde \beta _2}\left( y \right)\), then f(z) = exp(Az ² + Bz + C) ? σ _Γ(z - z ₁) ? σ _Γ(z - z ₂), where Γ is a lattice in ?; σ _Γ is the Weierstrass sigma-function associated with Γ; A,B,C, z ₁, z ₂ ∈ ?; and \({z_1} - {z_2} \notin \left( {\frac{1}{2}\Gamma } \right)\backslash \Gamma \).     

Centralizers of generalized skew derivations on multilinear polynomials

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, let Q be the right Martindale quotient ring of R, and let C be the extended centroid of R. Suppose that G is a nonzero generalized skew derivation of R and f(x ₁,..., x _n ) is a noncentral multilinear polynomial over C with n noncommuting variables. Let f(R) = {f(r ₁,..., r _n ): r _i ∈ R} be the set of all evaluations of f(x ₁,..., x _n ) in R, while A = {[G (f(r ₁,..., r _n )), f(r ₁,..., r _n )]: r _i ∈ R}, and let C _R (A) be the centralizer of A in R; i.e., C _R (A) = {a ∈ R: [a, x] = 0, ? _x ∈ A }. We prove that if A ≠ (0), then C _R (A) = Z(R).     

Right inverses for linear, constant coefficient partial differential operators on distributions over open half spaces

Results of Hörmander on evolution operators together with a characterization of the present authors [Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 40, 619–655 (1990)] are used to prove the following: Let P ∈ ?[z₁,...,z _n ] and denote by P _m its principal part. If P ? P_m is dominated by P _m then the following assertions for the partial differential operators P(D) and P _m(D) are equivalent for N ∈ S ^n?1:

1. P(D) and/or P_m D)admit a continuous linear right inverse on C ^∞(H ₊(N)).
2. P(D) admits a continuous linear right inverse on C ^∞ (? ⁿ ) and a fundamental solution E ∈ C ^∞(?ⁿ) satisfying Supp $E \subset \overline {H - (N)} $

where H ₊(N) := {x ∈ ? ⁿ :±(x,N) τ; 0}.     

Uniform boundary Harnack principle and generalized triangle property

Let D be a bounded open subset in R^d, d?2, and let G denote the Green function for D with respect to (-Δ)^α/2, 0<α?2, α<d. If α<2, assume that D satisfies the interior corkscrew condition; if α=2, i.e., if G is the classical Green function on D, assume—more restrictively—that D is a uniform domain. Let g=G(·,y₀)∧1 for some y₀∈D. Based on the uniform boundary Harnack principle, it is shown that G has the generalized triangle property which states that when d(z,x)?d(z,y). An intermediate step is the approximation G(x,y)≈|x-y|^α-dg(x)g(y)/g(A)², where A is an arbitrary point in a certain set B(x,y).This is discussed in a general setting where D is a dense open subset of a compact metric space satisfying the interior corkscrew condition and G is a quasi-symmetric positive numerical function on D×D which has locally polynomial decay and satisfies Harnack's inequality. Under these assumptions, the uniform boundary Harnack principle, the approximation for G, and the generalized triangle property turn out to be equivalent.     

Short cubic exponential sums over primes

For y ≥ x ^4/5 L ^8B+151 (where L = log(xq) and B is an absolute constant), a nontrivial estimate is obtained for short cubic exponential sums over primes of the form S ₃(α; x, y) = ∑ _x?y<n≤x Λ(n)e(αn ³), where α = a/q + θ/q ², (a, q) = 1, L ^32(B+20) < q ≤ y ⁵ x ^?2 L ^?32(B+20), |θ| ≤ 1, Λ is the von Mangoldt function, and e(t) = e ^2πit.     

A conjecture of Kippenhahn about the characteristic polynomial of a pencil generated by two Hermitian matrices. II

Let A be an n × n matrix; write A = H+iK, where i²=—1 and H and K are Hermitian. Let f(x,y,z) = det(zI?xH?yK). We first show that a pair of matrices over an algebraically closed field, which satisfy quadratic polynomials, can be put into block, upper triangular form, with diagonal blocks of size 1×1 or 2×2, via a simultaneous similarity. This is used to prove that if $\text{f(x,y,z) = [g(x,y,z)]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, where g has degree 2, then for some unitary matrix U, the matrix U¹AU is the direct sum of $\text{n}\text{2}$ copies of a 2×2 matrix A₁, where A₁ is determined, up to unitary similarity, by the polynomial g(x,y,z). We use the connection between f(x,y,z) and the numerical range of A to investigate the case where f(x,y,z) has the form (z?αax? βy)^r[g(x,y,z)]^s, where g(x,y,z) is irreducible of degree 2.