Graph equations for line graphs,total graphs,middle graphs and quasi-total graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex-set V(G) and edge-set X(G). Let L(G) and T(G) denote the line graph and total graph of G. The middle graph M(G) of G is an intersection graph Ω(F) on the vertex-set V(G) of any graph G. Let F = V′(G) ∪ X(G) where V′(G) indicates the family of all one-point subsets of the set V(G), then $\text{M(G) = Ω(F)}$.The quasi-total graph P(G) of G is a graph with vertex-set V(G)∪X(G) and two vertices are adjacent if and only if they correspond to two non-adjacent vertices of G or to two adjacent edges of G or to a vertex and an edge incident to it in G.In this paper we solve graph equations $\text{L(G) ? P(H);}\text{L(G)}\text{? P(H); P(G) ? T(H);}\text{P(G)}\text{? T(H); M(G) ? P(H);}\text{M(G)}\text{? P(H)}$.     

Minimum number of edges in graphs that are both P2- and Pi-connected

A simple graph with n vertices is called P_i-connected if any two distinct vertices are connected by an elementary path of length i. In this paper, lower bounds of the number of edges in graphs that are both P₂- and P_i-connected are obtained. Namely if $\text{i?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(n+1)}$, then |E(G)|?((4i?5)/(2i?2))(n?1), and if $\text{i >}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(n+ 1)}$, then |E(G)|?2(n?1) apart from one exeptional graph. Furthermore, extremal graphs are determined in the former.     

Hamiltonicity in (0–1)-polyhedra

The graph G(P) of a polyhedron P has a node corresponding to each vertex of P and two nodes are adjacent in G(P) if and only if the corresponding vertices of P are adjacent on P. We show that if P ? $\text{R}$ⁿ is a polyhedron, all of whose vertices have (0–1)-valued coordinates, then (i) if G(P) is bipartite, the G(P) is a hypercube; (ii) if G(P) is nonbipartite, then G(P) is hamilton connected. It is shown that if P ? $\text{R}$ⁿ has (0–1)-valued vertices and is of dimension d (≤n) then there exists a polyhedron P′ ? $\text{R}$^d having (0–1)-valued vertices such that $\text{G(P) ? G(P′)}$. Some combinatorial consequences of these results are also discussed.     

Subpancyclicity of line graphs and degree sums along paths

A graph is called subpancyclic if it contains a cycle of length ? for each ? between 3 and the circumference of the graph. We show that if G is a connected graph on n?146 vertices such that d(u)+d(v)+d(x)+d(y)>(n+10/2) for all four vertices u,v,x,y of any path P=uvxy in G, then the line graph L(G) is subpancyclic, unless G is isomorphic to an exceptional graph. Moreover, we show that this result is best possible, even under the assumption that L(G) is hamiltonian. This improves earlier sufficient conditions by a multiplicative factor rather than an additive constant.     

The binding number of a graph and its Anderson number

The binding number of a graph G, bind(G), is defined; some examples of its calculation are given, and some upper bounds for it are proved. It is then proved that, if bind(G) ≥ c, then G contains at least $\text{|G|}\text{c}\text{(c + 1)}$ disjoint edges if $\text{0 ≤ c ≤}\text{1}\text{2}$, at least $\text{| G |}\text{(3c ? 2)}\text{3c}\text{?}\text{2(c ? 1)}\text{c}$ disjoint edges if $\text{1 ≤ c ≤}\text{4}\text{3}$, a Hamiltonian circuit if $\text{c ≥}\text{3}\text{2}$, and a circuit of length at least $\text{3(| G | ?1)(c ? 1)}\text{c}$ if $\text{1 < c ≤}\text{3}\text{2}$ and G is not one of two specified exceptional graphs. Each of these results is best possible.The Anderson number of a graph is defined. The Anderson numbers of a few very simple graphs are determined; and some rather weak bounds are obtained, and some conjectures made, on the Anderson numbers of graphs in general.     

A lower bound for the independence number of a planar graph

A subset of the vertices of a graph is independent if no two vertices in the subset are adjacent. The independence number α(G) is the maximum number of vertices in an independent set. We prove that if G is a planar graph on N vertices then $\text{α(G)/N ?}\text{2}\text{9}$.     

New upper bounds for the greatest number of proper colorings of a (V,E)-graph

Let ?? denote the family of simple undirected graphs on v vertices having e edges ((v, e)-graphs) and P(G; λ) be the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. For the given integers v, e, and λ, let f(v, e, λ) denote the greatest number of proper colorings in λ or less colors that a (v, e)-graph G can have, i.e., f(v, e, λ) = max{P(G; λ): G ∈ ??}. In this paper we determine some new upper bounds for f(v, e, λ).     

Total edge irregularity strength of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs

A total edge irregular k-labelling ν of a graph G is a labelling of the vertices and edges of G with labels from the set {1,…,k} in such a way that for any two different edges e and f their weights φ(f) and φ(e) are distinct. Here, the weight of an edge g=uv is φ(g)=ν(g)+ν(u)+ν(v), i. e. the sum of the label of g and the labels of vertices u and v. The minimum k for which the graph G has an edge irregular total k-labelling is called the total edge irregularity strength of G.We have determined the exact value of the total edge irregularity strength of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs.     

Results on the edge-connectivity of graphs

It is shown that if G is a graph of order p ≥ 2 such that deg u + deg v ≥ p ? 1 for all pairs u, v of nonadjacent vertices, then the edge-connectivity of G equals the minimum degree of G. Furthermore, if deg u + deg v ≥ p for all pairs u, v of nonadjacent vertices, then either p is even and G is isomorphic to $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>p</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{× K}{}_2$ or every minimum cutset of edges of G consists of the collection of edges incident with a vertex of least degree.     

On a problem of C. C. Chen and D. E. Daykin

Let α(k, p, h) be the maximum number of vertices a complete edge-colored graph may have with no color appearing more than k times at any vertex and not containing a complete subgraph on p vertices with no color appearing more than h times at any vertex. We prove that $\text{α(k, p, h) ≤ h + 1 + (k ? 1){(p ? h ? 1) × (h}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ 1)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>h</mtext>}}$ and obtain a stronger upper bound for α(k, 3, 1). Further, we prove that a complete edge-colored graph with n vertices contains a complete subgraph on p vertices in which no two edges have the same color if

$\text{(}\text{n}\text{3}\text{)>(}\text{p}\text{3}\text{)}\text{Σ}\text{i=1}\text{t}\text{(}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{2}\text{)}$

where e_i is the number of edges of color i, 1 ≤ i ≤ t.     

Some Asymptotic ith Ramsey numbers

Let G be a graph with chromatic number χ(G) and let t(G) be the minimum number of vertices in any color class among all χ(G)-vertex colorings of G. Let H′ be a connected graph and let H be a graph obtained by subdividing (adding extra vertices to) a fixed edge of H′. It is proved that if the order of H is sufficiently large, the ith Ramsey number r_i(G, H) equals $\text{[}\text{((χ(G)?1)(|}\text{H}\text{|?1)+t(G)?1)}\text{i}\text{]+1}$.     

On the greatest number of 2 and 3 colorings of a (v,e)-graph

Let F denote the family of simple undirected graphs on v vertices having e edges ((v, e)-graphs) and P(λ, G) be the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. For the given integers v, e, Δ, let f(v, e, Δ) denote the greatest number of proper colorings in Δ or less colors that a (v, e)-graph G can have, i.e., f(v, e, Δ) = max{P(Δ, G): G ∈ F}. In this paper we determine f(v, e, 2) and describe all graphs G for which P(2, G) = f(v, e, 2). For f(v, e, 3), a lower bound and an upper bound are found.     

The extremal graph problem of the icosahedron

P. Turán has asked the following question:Let I¹² be the graph determined by the vertices and edges of an icosahedron. What is the maximum number of edges of a graph Gⁿ of n vertices if Gⁿ does not contain I¹² as a subgraph?We shall answer this question by proving that if n is sufficiently large, then there exists only one graph having maximum number of edges among the graphs of n vertices and not containing I¹². This graph Hⁿ can be defined in the following way:Let us divide n ? 2 vertices into 3 classes each of which contains [$\text{(n?2)}\text{3}$] or $\text{[}\text{(n?2)}\text{3}\text{] + 1}$ vertices. Join two vertices iff they are in different classes. Join two vertices outside of these classes to each other and to every vertex of these three classes.     

Graph Equation for Line Graphs and m-Step Graphs

Given a graph G, the m-step graph of G, denoted by S _m (G), has the same vertex set as G and an edge between two distinct vertices u and v if there is a walk of length m from u to v. The line graph of G, denoted by L(G), is a graph such that the vertex set of L(G) is the edge set of G and two vertices u and v of L(G) are adjacent if the edges corresponding to u and v share a common end vertex in G. We characterize connected graphs G such that S _m (G) and L(G) are isomorphic.     

On the Super Edge-Magic Deficiency of Graphs

A (p, q) graph G is edge-magic if there exists a bijective function f: V(G) ∪ E(G) → {1,2,…,p + q} such that f(u) + f(v) + f(uv) = k is a constant, called the valence of f, for any edge uv of G. Moreover, G is said to be super edge-magic if f(V(G)) = {1,2,…,p}. The question studied in this paper is for which graphs is it possible to add a finite number of isolated vertices so that the resulting graph is super edge-magic? If it is possible for a given graph G, then we say that the minimum such number of isolated vertices is the super edge-magic deficiency, μ_s(G) of G; otherwise we define it to be + ∞.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

Solution of the Hamiltonian problem for self-complementary graphs

A graph G is said to be highly constricted if there exists a nonempty subset S of vertices such that (i) G ? S has more than |S| components, (ii) S induces the complete graph, and (iii) for every u ∈ S and v ? S, we have d_G(u) > d_G(v), where d_G(u) denotes the degree of u in G. In this paper it is shown that a non-hamiltonian self-complementary graph G of order p is highly constricted, unless p = 4N and G is a particular graph $\text{G}{}^1\text{(4N)}$. It is also proved that if G is a self-complementary graph of order p(≥8) and π its degree sequence, then G is pancyclic if π has a realization with a hamiltonian cycle, and G has a 2-factor if π has a realization with a 2-factor, unless p = 4N and $\text{G = G}{}^1\text{(4N)}$.     

On complementary graphs with no isolated vertices

Let $\text{G}$ denote the complement of a graph G, and x(G), β₁(G), β₄(G), α₀(G), α₁(G) denote respectively the chromatic number, line-independence number, point-independence number, point-covering number, line-covering number of G, Nordhaus and Gaddum showed that for any graph G of order $\text{p}\text{, {2√p} ? x(G) + x(}\text{G}\text{) ? p + 1}\text{and p}\text{? x(G)·x(}\text{G}\text{) ? [(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(p + 1))}{}^2\text{]}$. Recently Chartrand and Schuster have given the corresponding inequalities for the independence numbers of any graph G. However, combining their result with Gallai's well known formula β₁(G) + α₁(G) = ?, one is not deduce the analogous bounds for the line-covering numbers of $\text{G}\text{and}\text{G}$, since Gallai's formula holds only if G contains no isolated vertex. The purpose of this note is to improve the results of Chartland and Schuster for line-independence numbers for graphs where both $\text{G}\text{and}\text{G}$ contain no isolated vertices and thereby allowing us to use Gallai's formula to get the corresponding bounds for the line-covering numbers of G.     

On integral sum graphs with a saturated vertex

As introduced by F.Harary in 1994, a graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its vertices can be given a labeling f with distinct integers so that for any two distinct vertices u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v) = f(w) for some vertex w in G.     

A note on traversing specified vertices in graphs embedded with large representativity

A graph G is said to have property P(2,k) if given any k+2 distinct vertices a,b,v₁,…,v_k, there is a path P in G joining a and b and passing through all of v₁,…,v_k. A graph G is said to have property C(k) if given any k distinct vertices v₁,…,v_k, there is a cycle C in G containing all of v₁,…,v_k. It is shown that if a 4-connected graph G is embedded in an orientable surface Σ (other than the sphere) of Euler genus eg(G,Σ), with sufficiently large representativity (as a function of both eg(G,Σ) and k), then G possesses both properties P(2,k) and C(k).