Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure analysis of 50 normal-hearing humans

When distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are measured with a high-frequency resolution, the DPOAE shows quasi-periodic variations across frequency, called DPOAE fine structure. In this study the DPOAE fine structure is determined for 50 normal-hearing humans using fixed primary levels of L1/L2 = 65/45 dB. An algorithm is developed, which characterizes the fine structure ripples in terms of three parameters: ripple spacing, ripple height, and ripple prevalence. The characteristic patterns of fine structure can be found in the DPOAE of all subjects, though the DPOAE fine structure characteristics are individual and vary from subject to subject. On average the ripple spacing decreases with increasing frequency from 1/8 oct at 1 kHz to 3/32 oct at 5 kHz. The ripple prevalence is two to three ripples per 1/3 oct, and ripple heights of up to 32 dB could be detected. The 50 normal-hearing subjects were divided into two groups, the subjects of group A having slightly better hearing levels than subjects of group B. The subjects of group A have significantly higher DPOAE levels. The overall prevalence of fine structure ripples do not differ between the two groups, but are higher and narrower for subjects of group B than for group A.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission of symphony orchestra musicians before and after rehearsal

The 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and hearing levels are obtained for 12 normal-hearing symphony orchestra musicians both before and after their rehearsal. The DPOAE fine structures are determined and analyzed according to the character and prevalence of ripples. Hearing levels, DPOAE levels, and DPOAE fine structures before and after rehearsal are similar, indicating that no or marginal temporary change of the state of hearing were caused by the exposure. The data were further compared to similar data for occupationally nonexposed subjects, one group which was age and gender matched, and other two groups of younger individuals (one group with better hearing levels than the other). The data for the age and gender matched group compared well with the musicians data (and the data for the group of better-hearing younger individuals). In general, the analyses of hearing thresholds and DPOAE data thus lead to the same conclusions concerning the state of hearing.     

Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses

Both distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) provide frequency-specific assessment of hearing. However, each method suffers from some restrictions. Hearing losses above 50 dB HL are not quantifiable using DPOAEs and their performance at frequencies below 1 kHz is limited, but their recording time is short. In contrast, ASSRs are a time-consuming method but have the ability to determine hearing thresholds in a wider range of frequencies and hearing losses. Thus, recording DPOAEs and ASSRs simultaneously at their adequate frequencies and levels could decrease the overall test time considerably. The goal of the present study was to develop a parameter-setting and test-protocol to measure DPOAEs and ASSRs binaurally and simultaneously at multiple frequencies. Ten normal-hearing and 23 hearing-impaired subjects participated in the study. The interaction of both responses when stimulated simultaneously at frequencies between 0.25 and 6 kHz was examined. Two limiting factors need to be kept. Frequency distance between ASSR carrier frequency f(c) and DPOAE primary tone f(2) needs to be at least 1.5 octaves, and DPOAEs may not be measured if the ASSR stimulus level is 70 dB SPL or above. There was a significant correlation between pure-tone and DPOAE/ASSR-thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss ears.     

Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise

Using an adaptive strategy, the effects of mild sensorineural hearing loss and adult listeners' chronological age on speech recognition in babble were evaluated. The signal-to-babble ratio required to achieve 50% recognition was measured for three speech materials presented at soft to loud conversational speech levels. Four groups of subjects were tested: (1) normal-hearing listeners less than 44 years of age, (2) subjects less than 44 years old with mild sensorineural hearing loss and excellent speech recognition in quiet, (3) normal-hearing listeners greater than 65 with normal hearing, and (4) subjects greater than 65 years old with mild hearing loss and excellent performance in quiet. Groups 1 and 3, and groups 2 and 4 were matched on the basis of pure-tone thresholds, and thresholds for each of the three speech materials presented in quiet. In addition, groups 1 and 2 were similar in terms of mean age and age range, as were groups 3 and 4. Differences in performance in noise as a function of age were observed for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners despite equivalent performance in quiet. Subjects with mild hearing loss performed significantly worse than their normal-hearing counterparts. These results and their implications are discussed.     

Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness

The reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements and their relation to loudness measurements was examined in 16 normal-hearing subjects and 58 subjects with hearing loss. The level of the distortion product (L(d)) was compared across two sessions and resulted in correlations that exceeded 0.90. The reliability of DPOAEs was less when parameters from nonlinear fits to the input/output (I/O) functions were compared across visits. Next, the relationship between DPOAE I/O parameters and the slope of the low-level portion of the categorical loudness scaling (CLS) function (soft slope) was assessed. Correlations of 0.65, 0.74, and 0.81 at 1, 2, and 4 kHz were observed between CLS soft slope and combined DPOAE parameters. Behavioral threshold had correlations of 0.82, 0.83, and 0.88 at 1, 2, and 4 kHz with CLS soft slope. Combining DPOAEs and behavioral threshold provided little additional information. Lastly, a multivariate approach utilizing the entire DPOAE I/O function was used to predict the CLS rating for each input level (dB SPL). Standard error of the estimate when using this method ranged from 2.4 to 3.0 categorical units (CU), suggesting that DPOAE I/O functions can predict CLS measures within the CU step size used in this study (5).     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression measurements were made in 20 subjects with normal hearing and 21 subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The probe consisted of two primary tones (f2, f1), with f2 held constant at 4 kHz and f2/f1 = 1.22. Primary levels (L1, L2) were set according to the equation L1 = 0.4 L2 + 39 dB [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)], with L2 ranging from 20 to 70 dB SPL (normal-hearing subjects) and 50-70 dB SPL (subjects with hearing loss). Responses elicited by the probe were suppressed by a third tone (f3), varying in frequency from 1 octave below to 1/2 octave above f2. Suppressor level (L3) varied from 5 to 85 dB SPL. Responses in the presence of the suppressor were subtracted from the unsuppressed condition in order to convert the data into decrements (amount of suppression). The slopes of the decrement versus L3 functions were less steep for lower frequency suppressors and more steep for higher frequency suppressors in impaired ears. Suppression tuning curves, constructed by selecting the L3 that resulted in 3 dB of suppression as a function of f3, resulted in tuning curves that were similar in appearance for normal and impaired ears. Although variable, Q10 and Q(ERB) were slightly larger in impaired ears regardless of whether the comparisons were made at equivalent SPL or equivalent sensation levels (SL). Larger tip-to-tail differences were observed in ears with normal hearing when compared at either the same SPL or the same SL, with a much larger effect at similar SL. These results are consistent with the view that subjects with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate hearing loss have similar tuning around a frequency for which the hearing loss exists, but reduced cochlear-amplifier gain.     

Is it necessary to penalize impulsive noise +5 dB due to higher risk of hearing damage?

It is studied whether the +5 dB penalty for impulsiveness established by ISO 1999:1990 accounts for a higher risk of noise-induced hearing loss. A total of 16 normal-hearing human subjects were exposed for 10 min to two types of binaural industrial-recordings: (1) a continuous broad-band noise normalized to L(EX,8 h)=80 dBA and (2) the combination of the previous stimulus with an impulsive noise normalized to L(EX,8 h)=75+5(db penalty)=80 dBA (peak level 117 dBC and repetition rate of 0.5 impacts per second). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in a broad frequency range before and in the following 90 min after the exposure. The group results show that the continuous exposure had a bigger impact on DPOAE levels, with a maximum DPOAE shift of approximately 5 dB in the frequency range of 2-3.15 kHz during the first 10 min of the recovery. No evident DPOAE shift is seen for the impulsive + continuous stimulus. The results indicate that the penalty overestimated the effects on DPOAE levels and support the concept that the risk of hearing loss from low-level impulses may be predicted on an equal-energy basis.     

Ipsilateral distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in children with sensorineural hearing loss

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) ipsilateral suppression has been applied to study cochlear function and maturation in laboratory animals and humans. Although DPOAE suppression appears to be sensitive to regions of specialized cochlear function and to cochlear immaturity, it is not known whether it reflects permanent cochlear damage, i.e., sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), in a reliable and systematic manner in humans. Eight school-aged children with mild-moderate SNHL and 20 normal-hearing children served as subjects in this study. DPOAE (2f1-f2) suppression data were collected at four f2 frequencies (1500, 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz) using moderate-level primary tones. Features of the DPOAE iso-suppression tuning curves and suppression growth were analyzed for both subject groups. Results show that DPOAE suppression tuning curves from hearing-impaired subjects can be reliably recorded. DPOAE suppression tuning curves were generally normal in appearance and shape for six out of eight hearing-impaired subjects but showed subtle abnormalities in at least one feature. There was not one single trend or pattern of abnormality that characterized all hearing-impaired subjects. The most prominent patterns of abnormality included: broadened tuning, elevated tip, and downward shift of tip frequency. The unique patterns of atypical DPOAE suppression in subjects with similar audiograms may suggest different patterns of underlying sensory cell damage. This speculation warrants further investigation.     

Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were recorded from eight human subjects with mild to moderate cochlear hearing loss, using a frequency spacing of 48 primary pairs per octave and at a level L1 = L2 = 60 dBSPL and with a fixed ratio f2/f1. Subjects with different shapes of hearing thresholds were selected. They included subjects with near-normal hearing within only a limited frequency range, subjects with a notch in the audiogram, and subjects with a mild to moderate high-frequency loss. If the primaries were located in a region of normal or near-normal hearing, but DP frequencies were located in a region of raised thresholds, the distortion product 2 f1-f2 was still observable, but the DP fine structure disappeared. If the DP frequencies fell into a region of normal thresholds, fine structure was preserved as long as DPOAE were generated, even in cases of mild hearing loss in the region of the primaries. These experimental results give further strong evidence that, in addition to the initial source in the primary region, there is a second source at the characteristic place of fDP. Simulations in a nonlinear and active computer model for DPOAE generation indicate different generation mechanisms for the two components. The disappearance of DPOAE fine structure might serve as a more sensitive indicator of hearing impairment than the consideration of DP level alone.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing threshold estimation and differentiation between middle-ear and cochlear disorders in neonates

Our aim in the present study was to apply extrapolated DPOAE I/O-functions [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002); 113, 3275-3284 (2003)] in neonates in order to investigate their ability to estimate hearing thresholds and to differentiate between middle-ear and cochlear disorders. DPOAEs were measured in neonates after birth (mean age = 3.2 days) and 4 weeks later (follow-up) at 11 test frequencies between f2 = 1.5 and 8 kHz and compared to that found in normal hearing subjects and cochlear hearing loss patients. On average, in a single ear hearing threshold estimation was possible at about 2/3 of the test frequencies. A sufficient test performance of the approach is therefore suggested. Thresholds were higher at the first measurement compared to that found at the follow-up measurement. Since thresholds varied with frequency, transitory middle ear dysfunction due to amniotic fluid instead of cochlear immaturity is suggested to be the cause for the change in thresholds. DPOAE behavior in the neonate ears differed from that found in the cochlear hearing loss ears. From a simple model it was concluded that the difference between the estimated DPOAE threshold and the DPOAE detection threshold is able to differentiate between sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.     

Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears

A new method for direct pure-tone threshold estimation from input/output functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in humans is presented. Previous methods use statistical models relating DPOAE level to hearing threshold including additional parameters e.g., age or slope of DPOAE I/O-function. Here we derive a DPOAE threshold from extrapolated DPOAE I/O-functions directly. Cubic 2 f1-f2 distortion products and pure-tone threshold at f2 were measured at 51 frequencies between f2=500 Hz and 8 kHz at up to ten primary tone levels between L2=65 and 20 dB SPL in 30 normally hearing and 119 sensorineural hearing loss ears. Using an optimized primary tone level setting (L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB) that accounts for the nonlinear interaction of the two primaries at the DPOAE generation site at f2, the pressure of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product pDP is a linear function of the primary tone level L2. Linear regression yields correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 in the majority of the DPOAE I/O-functions. The linear behavior is sufficiently fulfilled for all frequencies in normal and impaired hearing. This suggests that the observed linear functional dependency is quite general. Extrapolating towards pDP=0 yields the DPOAE threshold for L2. There is a significant correlation between DPOAE threshold and pure-tone threshold (r=0.65, p<0.001). Thus, the DPOAEs that reflect the functioning of an essential element of peripheral sound processing enable a reliable estimation of cochlear hearing threshold up to hearing losses of 50 dBHL without any statistical data.     

Maturation of cochlear nonlinearity as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in humans

The growth of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression follows a systematic, frequency-dependent pattern. The pattern is consistent with direct measures of basilar-membrane response growth, psychoacoustic measures of masking growth, and measures of neural rate growth. This pattern has its basis in the recognized nonlinear properties of basilar-membrane motion and, as such, the DPOAE suppression growth paradigm can be applied to human neonates to study the maturation of cochlear nonlinearity. The objective of this experiment was to investigate the maturation of human cochlear nonlinearity and define the time course for this maturational process. Normal-hearing adults, children, term-born neonates, and premature neonates, plus a small number of children with sensorineural hearing loss, were included in this experiment. DPOAE suppression growth was measured at two f2 frequencies (1500 and 6000 Hz) and three primary tone levels (55-45, 65-55, and 75-65 dB SPL). Slope of DPOAE suppression growth, as well as an asymmetry ratio (to compare slope for suppressor tones below and above f2 frequency), were generated. Suppression threshold was also measured in all subjects. Findings indicate that both term-born neonates and premature neonates who have attained term-like age, show non-adult-like DPOAE suppression growth for low-frequency suppressor tones. These age effects are most evident at f2 = 6000 Hz. In neonates, suppression growth is shallower and suppression thresholds are elevated for suppressor tones lower in frequency than f2. Additionally, the asymmetry ratio is smaller in neonates, indicating that the typical frequency-dependent pattern of suppression growth is not present. These findings suggest that an immaturity of cochlear nonlinearity persists into the first months of postnatal life. DPOAE suppression growth examined for a small group of hearing-impaired children also showed abnormalities.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

DPOAE input/output (I/O) functions were measured at 7f2 frequencies (1 to 8 kHz; f2/f1 = 1.22) over a range of levels (-5 to 95 dB SPL) in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. L1-L2 was level dependent in order to produce the largest 2f1-f2 responses in normal ears. System distortion was determined by collecting DP data in six different acoustic cavities. These data were used to derive a multiple linear regression model to predict system distortion levels. The model was tested on cochlear-implant users and used to estimate system distortion in all other ears. At most but not all f2's, measurements in cochlear implant ears were consistent with model predictions. At all f2 frequencies, the ears with normal auditory thresholds produced I/O functions characterized by compressive nonlinear regions at moderate levels, with more rapid growth at low and high stimulus levels. As auditory threshold increased, DPOAE threshold increased, accompanied by DPOAE amplitude reductions, notably over the range of levels where normal ears showed compression. The slope of the I/O function was steeper in impaired ears. The data from normal-hearing ears resembled direct measurements of basilar membrane displacement in lower animals. Data from ears with hearing loss showed that the compressive region was affected by cochlear damage; however, responses at high levels of stimulation resembled those observed in normal ears.     

Overshoot in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Overshoot was measured in both ears of four subjects with normal hearing and in five subjects with permanent, sensorineural hearing loss (two with a unilateral loss). The masker was a 400-ms broadband noise presented at a spectrum level of 20, 30, or 40 dB SPL. The signal was a 10-ms sinusoid presented 1 or 195 ms after the onset of the masker. Signal frequency was 1.0 or 4.0 kHz, which placed the signal in a region of normal (1.0 kHz) or impaired (4.0 kHz) absolute sensitivity for the impaired ears. For the normal-hearing subjects, the effects of signal frequency and masker level were similar to those published previously. In particular, overshoot was larger at 4.0 than at 1.0 kHz, and overshoot at 4.0 kHz tended to decrease with increasing masker level. At 4.0 kHz, overshoot values were significantly larger in the normal ears: Maximum values ranged from about 7-26 dB in the normal ears, but were always less than 5 dB in the impaired ears. The smaller overshoot values resulted from the fact that thresholds in the short-delay condition were considerably better in the hearing-impaired subjects than in the normal-hearing subjects. At 1.0 kHz, overshoot values for the two groups of subjects more or less overlapped. The results suggest that permanent, sensorineural hearing loss disrupts the mechanisms responsible for a large overshoot effect.     

Automated pure-tone threshold estimations from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions

A promising approach to the prediction of pure-tone thresholds through the estimation of DPOAE thresholds by input/output functions was recently published by Boege and Janssen [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002)]. On the basis of their results, a device that enables automated measurements of these thresholds was recently developed. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of this instrument for the objective assessment of hearing loss in 101 ears with either normal hearing or with cochlear hearing loss of up to 50 dB HL. The median difference between pure-tone hearing and DPOAE thresholds was approximately 2 dB. For individual subjects, however, DPOAE thresholds differed from pure-tone thresholds by up to 40 dB. We find, therefore, that the clinical benefits of this method are probably limited.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude growth in human adults and neonates

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are thought to be by-products of an active amplification process in the cochlea and thus serve as a metric for evaluating the integrity of this process. Because the cochlear amplifier functions in a level-dependent fashion, DPOAEs recorded as a function of stimulus level (i.e., a DPOAE growth function) may provide important information about the range and operational characteristics of the cochlear amplifier. The DPOAE growth functions recorded in human adults and neonates may provide information about the maturation of these active cochlear processes. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment I included normal-hearing adults and term-born neonates. The 2f1-f2 DPOAE growth functions were recorded for both age groups at three f2 frequencies. Experiment II was an extension of the first experiment but added a subject group of premature neonates. The results of these studies indicate that DPOAE growth functions most often show amplitude saturation and nonmonotonic growth for all age groups. However, premature neonates show monotonic growth and the absence of amplitude saturation more often than adults. Those premature neonates who do show saturation also show an elevated threshold for amplitude saturation relative to adults. In contrast, term neonates are adultlike for most measures except that they show a larger percentage of nonsaturating growth functions than adults. These results may indicate immaturity in cochlear amplifier function prior to term birth in humans. Outer hair cell function and/or efferent regulation of outer hair cell function are hypothesized sources of this immaturity, although some contribution from the immature middle ear cannot be ruled out.     

Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are used widely in humans to assess cochlear function. The standard procedure consists of recording the 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude as a function of the f2 frequency, using a fixed f2/f1 ratio (DPOAE-gram), close to 1.20. DPOAE amplitude, as recorded in the DPOAE-gram, shows a wide range of values in normal-hearing subjects, which can impair the predictive value of the DPOAE-gram for hearing thresholds. This study is aimed at comparing intersubject variability in 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude according to three paradigms: a fixed f2/f1 ratio, such as the DPOAE-gram, a variable ratio DPOAE-gram (f2/f1 adapted to frequency) and an "optimum" DPOAE-gram, where the f2/f1 is adapted both to subject and frequency. The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude has been investigated on 18 normally hearing subjects at ten different f2 frequencies (from 0.75 to 6 kHz), using an f2 fixed, f1 sweep paradigm, and allowed to define, for each frequency, the f2/f1 ratio giving the greatest 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude (or optimum ratio). Results showed a large intersubject variability of the optimum ratio, especially at frequencies below 1.5 kHz, and a significant decrease of the optimum ratio with frequency. The optimum DPOAE-gram was underestimated by up to 5.8 dB on average (up to 14.9 dB for an individual subject) by the fixed ratio DPOAE-gram, and by up to 3 dB on average (up to 10.6 dB for an individual subject) by the variable ratio DPOAE-gram. Intersubject variability was slightly but significantly reduced in the optimum DPOAE-gram versus the fixed-ratio DPOAE-gram. Lastly, correlations between tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) amplitudes and maximum DPOAE amplitudes were significantly greater than correlations between TBOAE amplitudes and fixed-ratio DPOAE amplitudes.     

Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions

Evidence of the compressive growth of basilar-membrane displacement can be seen in distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels measured as a function of stimulus level. When the levels of the two stimulus tones (f1 and f2) are related by the formula L1 = 39 dB + 0.4 x L2 [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)] the shape of the function relating DPOAE level to L2 is similar (up to an L2 of 70 dB SPL) to the classic Fletcher and Munson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 9, 1-10 (1933)] loudness function when plotted on a logarithmic scale. Explicit estimates of compression have been derived based on recent DPOAE measurements from the laboratory. If DPOAE growth rate is defined as the slope of the DPOAE I/O function (in dB/dB), then a cogent definition of compression is the reciprocal of the growth rate. In humans with normal hearing, compression varies from about 1 at threshold to about 4 at 70 dB SPL. With hearing loss, compression is still about 1 at threshold, but grows more slowly above threshold. Median DPOAE I/O data from ears with normal hearing, mild loss, and moderate loss are each well fit by log functions. When the I/O function is logarithmic, then the corresponding compression is a linear function of stimulus level. Evidence of cochlear compression also exists in DPOAE suppression tuning curves, which indicate the level of a third stimulus tone (f3) that reduces DPOAE level by 3 dB. All three stimulus tones generate compressive growth within the cochlea; however, only the relative compression (RC) of the primary and suppressor responses is observable in DPOAE suppression data. An RC value of 1 indicates that the cochlear responses to the primary and suppressor components grow at the same rate. In normal ears, RC rises to 4, when f3 is an octave below f2. The similarities between DPOAE and loudness compression estimates suggest the possibility of predicting loudness growth from DPOAEs; however, intersubject variability makes such predictions difficult at this time.     

Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

For 140 male subjects (20 per decade between the ages 20 and 89) and 72 female subjects (20 per decade between 60 and 89, and 12 for the age interval 90-96), the monaural speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences was investigated in quiet and at four noise levels (22.2, 37.5, 52.5, and 67.5 dBA noise with long-term average speech spectra). The median SRT as well as the quartiles are given as a function of age. The data are described in terms of a model published earlier [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 533-549 (1978)]. According to this model every hearing loss for speech (SHL) is interpreted as the sum of a loss class A (attenuation), characterized by a reduction of the levels of both speech signal and noise, and a loss class D (distortion), comparable with a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio. Both SHLA+D (hearing loss in quiet) and SHLD (hearing loss at high noise levels) increase progressively above the age of 50 (reaching typical values of 30 and 6 dB, respectively, at age 85). The spread of SHLD as a function of SHLA+D for the individual ears is so large (sigma = 2.7 dB) that subjects with the same hearing loss for speech in quiet may differ considerably in their ability to understand speech in noise. The data confirm that the hearing handicap of many elderly subjects manifests itself primarily in a noisy environment. Acceptable noise levels in rooms used by the aged must be 5 to 10 dB lower than those for normal-hearing subjects.     

Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech

Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with a competing talker background for signals processed to contain variable amounts of temporal fine structure (TFS) information, using nine normal-hearing and nine hearing-impaired subjects. Signals (speech and background talker) were bandpass filtered into channels. Channel signals for channel numbers above a "cut-off channel" (CO) were vocoded to remove TFS information, while channel signals for channel numbers of CO and below were left unprocessed. Signals from all channels were combined. As a group, hearing-impaired subjects benefited less than normal-hearing subjects from the additional TFS information that was available as CO increased. The amount of benefit varied between hearing-impaired individuals, with some showing no improvement in SRT and one showing an improvement similar to that for normal-hearing subjects. The reduced ability to take advantage of TFS information in speech may partially explain why subjects with cochlear hearing loss get less benefit from listening in a fluctuating background than normal-hearing subjects. TFS information may be important in identifying the temporal "dips" in such a background.