In-house reference materials of mometasone furoate with traceable assay certified values

Characterization of in-house reference materials (IHRMs) with traceable property values for the mometasone furoate assay is discussed. The traceability of the value carried by the IHRM has been established to the value carried by a higher metrological status United States Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard (USP RS). A comparative approach is used to overcome systematic errors in measurement results, specific to the measurement method and/or to the laboratory developing the IHRM. The traceability chain was realized by the simultaneous analysis of the IHRM and the USP RS test portions under the same conditions.     

Designs of experiment for proficiency testing with a limited number of participants

Metrological designs of experiment for proficiency testing (PT) with a limited number of participants are discussed. The designs are based on development of in-house reference materials (IHRMs) with traceable assigned values and fit-for-purpose uncertainties, used in a PT scheme as the measurement standards. When adequate certified reference materials (CRMs) are available, a comparative approach for IHRM development, using simultaneous analysis of IHRM and CRM test portions in pairs, is proposed for PT objectives. In the case where adequate CRMs are not available – for example, in the field of analysis of unstable aqueous systems – the function of the measurement standard for PT can be fulfilled by a synthetic IHRM prepared gravimetrically using non-adequate, non-aqueous CRMs or pure substances. The CRM or the pure substance is used as a spike for fortification of a natural water sample, while the natural water sample is used as a working IHRM for the spike determination. In this case the traceability chain is longer, since two IHRMs are added for one quantity determination, but it remains unbroken.Presented at the Second International Conference on Metrology –Trends and Applications in Calibration and Testing Laboratories, 4–6 November 2003, Eilat, Israel     

Traceability of (values carried by) reference materials

 Traceability is a property of the result of a measurement. Since values carried by (reference) materials must also have been obtained, of necessity, by measurement, the definition of traceability also applies to reference materials. It is extremely helpful to give the traceability (of the origin) of a reference material a separate name, i.e. 'trackability'. An analysis of the function of values carried by reference materials, shows that they can fulfill different functions, depending on the intended use. One of the functions located outside the traceability chain – and hence not very relevant for establishing traceability – is evaluating the approximate size of the uncertainty of the measurement of an unknown sample by performing a similar measurement on a reference material, used as a 'simulated sample'. Another function is located inside the traceability chain, where the reference material is used as an added 'internal standard'. Then, the value carried by the reference material is essential for establishing the traceability of the measured value of an unknown sample. In the latter application, the reference material acts as an 'amount standard' (the certified value for amount is used). Received: 11 November 1999 / Accepted: 24 February 2000     

Local comparability of proficiency testing results: determination of concrete slump and compressive strength values

A proficiency testing (PT) scheme is developed for comparability assessment of results of concrete slump and compressive strength determination. The scheme is based on preparing of a test portion/sample of a concrete in-house reference material (IHRM) at a reference laboratory (RL) in the same conditions for every PT participant. Therefore, in this scheme IHRM instability is not relevant as a source of measurement/test uncertainty, while intra- and between-samples inhomogeneity parameters are evaluated using the results of RL testing of the samples taken at the beginning, the middle and the end of the PT experiment. The IHRM assigned slump and compressive strength values are calculated as averaged RL results. Their uncertainties include the measurement/test uncertainty components and the components arising from the material inhomogeneity. The test results of 25 PT participants were compared with the IHRM assigned values taking into account both the uncertainties of the assigned values and the measurement/test uncertainties of the participants. Since traceability of the IHRM assigned values to the international measurement standards and SI units cannot be stated, local comparability of the results is assessed. It is shown, that comparability of the slump and compressive strength determination results is satisfactory, while uncertainty evaluation for slump results requires additional efforts.     

Implementation of proficiency testing schemes for a limited number of participants

A metrological background for the selection and use of proficiency testing (PT) schemes for a limited number N of laboratories-participants (less than 20–30) is discussed. The following basic scenarios are taken into account: (1) adequate matrix certified reference materials (CRM) or in-house reference materials (IHRM) with traceable property values are available for PT use as test items; (2) no appropriate matrix CRM is available, but a CRM or IHRM with traceable property values can be applied as a spike or similar; (3) only an IHRM with limited traceability is available. The discussion also considers the effect of a limited population of PT participants N _p on statistical assessment of the PT results for a given sample of N responses from this population. When N _p is finite and the sample fraction N/N _p is not negligible, a correction to the statistical parameters may be necessary. Scores suitable for laboratory performance assessment in such PT schemes are compared. Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Metrology, November 2006, Tel Aviv, Israel.     

Determination of the reference value of nitrogen mass fraction in the reference material of Polish soil

Ensuring a traceability and meaningful of a measurements is one of the most important stages of each analysis, each measurement. It is especially important for measurement of the environmental samples, like soil, which is a very complex matrix. A certified reference materials (CRMs) should be routinely used for this purpose. The paper discusses the procedure for preparation of the soil samples for certification as CRM. As for agricultural reasons there is a growing demand for CRMs regarding a nitrogen mass fraction in the Polish soil, we prepared such a material and established the reference value with associated measurement uncertainty. Homogeneity and stability of the material were shown to be appropriate for the intended purpose. The presented approach can also be used in a process of manufacture of a laboratory reference material, which can be used for a routine quality control.     

The need for reference materials when monitoring nitrate intake

Whether dietary exposure to nitrate metabolites is detrimental or beneficial to human health has long been a matter of controversy. In spite of no consistent epidemiological evidence, nitrate metabolites are associated with the formation of carcinogenic-nitrosamines and gastric cancer. Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate that ingested nitrate plays a role in host defence against gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria. Analytical values of nitrate content in foods are essential for estimating nitrate intake. The analytical process is of paramount importance for assessing human nitrate exposure and for establishing a link between these exposures and the current and future observed health effects. Therefore, the quality assurance of the measurement process is crucial to obtaining reliability, comparability and traceability of results. Certified Reference Materials (CRM) should play a role in the consistency of the measurement process. However, the availability of nitrate CRMs is still poor. When food monitoring is demanded, an approach could be to use In House Reference Materials (IHRM), prepared at a high metrological level, and all preparation steps should be quality driven. IHRMs were prepared, and available CRMs were used to provide traceability of the process. The homogeneity of IHRM was evaluated using an appropriate statistical design. The stability was monitored using an isochronous method. The material shelf life and storage conditions are presented.HPLC was optimised for the determination of nitrates in four vegetable categories. When a suite of IHRMs were used, the response of the HPLC system was linear over the range 1 to 8 mg L^–1. The detection limit for these compounds was 0.2 g L^–1 and the determination limit 1.2 g L^–1.The relationship between measurement uncertainty and critical points of the analytical process is presented. The differences in observed relative uncertainty between food categories could reflect current limitations in the food matrix reference materials.     

The key elements of traceability in chemical measurement: agreed or still under debate?

 Talking about "traceability" means talking about a "property of the result of a measurement", about "the value of a standard", about "stated references" and about an "unbroken chain of comparisons". It describes by which comparison, and to which other value, the result of a measurement has been obtained, i.e. is "traceable to". It is about the underlying structure of the measurement process of the result of a measurement and therefore about the authority of the result. Since values carried by (certified) reference materials have also been obtained by measurement, the definition of traceability equally applies. Traceability in the context of reference materials is also about the authority of the values carried by the (certified) reference materials and is, therefore, of key importance for the authority of the reference materials themselves. Hence, values of results of measurements constitute part of the traceability chain and their uncertainties are an intrinsic accompanying phenomenon. Uncertainties need a traceability chain against which they can be evaluated, and a traceability chain is an a priori requirement for evaluating the uncertainty budget of a measurement result. An attempt has been made to exemplify "traceability" chains in some types of chemical measurement and to identify the degree of international agreement on the key elements of "traceability". It is concluded that there is less than universal agreement on this issue. The debate should continue in order to arrive at the international understanding and agreement needed, as "traceability" is now being incorporated in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation (ILAC) and in other "guiding" or regulatory documents. It is also the reason why the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) has taken up the study of the concept in its core programme on Metrology in Chemistry, and why it sponsored the Workshop in Bratislava.

     

Extended traceability of pH: an evaluation of the role of Pitzer's equations

The 2002 IUPAC recommendation on pH (provisional) has taken its own philosophy to provide a basis for comparable and traceable assignment of a value, from a measurement, to the quantity pH. Whereas the substituted 1983 IUPAC recommendation relied heavily on precisely prescribed experimental techniques and procedures, the current recommendation defines a hierarchical relationship between references for comparison (primary and secondary standards) and objective criteria on the comparison of measurements with these standards. The recommendation aims at a traceability chain from the national metrological institution (NMI) level down to field and laboratory measurements. Currently, however, the traceability chain is developed to the level of certified reference materials (CRM), namely the above mentioned primary and secondary standards. To complete the traceability chain, several theoretical and practical aspects have to be pondered. In part, the methods for comparative assessment of different options have yet to be developed. As an illustrating example of the complexity of issues to be considered in a further extension of the traceability chain is estimation of the doubt associated with Pitzer coefficients. The Pitzer equations for activity coefficient modelling are explicitly mentioned in the 2002 IUPAC recommendation on pH (provisional) as enabling possible improvement in the ionic strength extrapolations to zero ionic strength. An assessment of uncertainty of ternary Pitzer coefficients is given for the first time.     

New IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) recommendations on the measurement of pH - background and essentials

The IUPAC Recommendations on pH (1985) have serious metrological deficiencies (recommendation of two pH scales and of several pH definitions and procedures to measure pH). Background and essential features of new recommendations, which replace the 1985 document, are reported in this paper. The new document is strictly based on metrological principles. pH is defined (notionally) by the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity according to S?rensen and Linderstr?m-Lang (1924), that is pH=-lg a(H). Because pH is a single ion quantity it is immeasurable and is therefore experimentally verified, with stated uncertainties, by pH(PS) values of primary standard buffer solutions. The assignment of pH(PS) is carried out in a Harned cell (without transference), which is defined as a primary method of measurement, and involves the Bates-Guggenheim convention. pH(PS) is thus a conventional quantity. Consideration of the uncertainty of the Bates-Guggenhein convention, however, permits its incorporation into the internationally accepted SI system of measurement. Comparison of the pH of secondary buffer solutions with pH(PS) values in recommended cells with transference yields secondary standards, whose pH(SS) can be traced back to pH(PS) and consequently to the definition of pH. The traceability chain is continued "downwards" by practical cells with transference containing glass electrodes for the measurement of pH(X) values of unknown solutions, for which three calibration procedures are recommended. The measurement of pH is thus represented by the traceability chain pH(X)-->pH(SS)-->pH(PS)-->pH as defined, each step having stated uncertainties. This hierarchical system of measurement excludes any pH 'scale'. Tabulated pH(PS) values are given as examples, and it is recommended that actual pH(PS) and pH(SS) be taken from certificates, which are to accompany each lot of certified reference material (CRM). Target uncertainties and examples of their calculation, a sign convention for pH cells and conventions for presenting cell schemes are given in the new document.     

Evaluation of measurement uncertainties for the determination of total metal content in soils by atomic absorption spectrometry

In this work estimation of measurement uncertainties associated with the total metal content in soils was done by an intralaboratory approach based on method validation and quality control data, and using two certified reference materials (CRM). CRM and soil samples were analyzed following procedures based on the methods that are applied to silicate materials. All elements were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry following a quality assurance program previously established. Quality control actions were implemented in order to provide reliable data. The precision under within-laboratory reproducibility conditions was estimated from triplicate analysis. The trueness component was determined as recovery of the analyte from CRMs: soil sample, SO-2 and river clay sediment, LGC 6139. Combined measurement uncertainty was expressed in terms of precision and recovery uncertainties and the later further split on CRM replicate analysis and uncertainty of the certified value components. The results obtained are critically discussed on the basis of the different contributions. For the selection of the reference material, the CRM dependent terms are critically compared in order to fulfill specific requirements. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

The key elements of traceability in chemical measurement: agreed or still under debate?

Talking about "traceability" means talking about a "property of the result of a measurement", about "the value of a standard", about "stated references" and about an "unbroken chain of comparisons". It describes by which comparison, and to which other value, the result of a measurement has been obtained, i.e. is "traceable to". It is about the underlying structure of the measurement process of the result of a measurement and therefore about the authority of the result. Since values carried by (certified) reference materials have also been obtained by measurement, the definition of traceability equally applies. Traceability in the context of reference materials is also about the authority of the values carried by the (certified) reference materials and is, therefore, of key importance for the authority of the reference materials themselves. Hence, values of results of measurements constitute part of the traceability chain and their uncertainties are an intrinsic accompanying phenomenon. Uncertainties need a traceability chain against which they can be evaluated, and a traceability chain is an a priori requirement for evaluating the uncertainty budget of a measurement result. An attempt has been made to exemplify "traceability" chains in some types of chemical measurement and to identify the degree of international agreement on the key elements of "traceability". It is concluded that there is less than universal agreement on this issue. The debate should continue in order to arrive at the international understanding and agreement needed, as "traceability" is now being incorporated in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Laboratory Accreditation Co-operation (ILAC) and in other "guiding" or regulatory documents. It is also the reason why the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) has taken up the study of the concept in its core programme on Metrology in Chemistry, and why it sponsored the Workshop in Bratislava.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way. This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.     

Performance evaluation of elemental analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry methods for the determination of the D/H ratio in tetramethylurea and other compounds--results of a laboratory inter-comparison

Tetramethylurea (TMU) with a certified D/H ratio is the internal standard for Site-specific Natural Isotope Fractionation measured by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (SNIF-NMR) analysis of wine ethanol for detection of possible adulterations (Commission Regulation 2676/90). A new batch of a TMU certified reference material (CRM) is currently being prepared. Whereas SNIF-NMR has been employed up to now, Elemental Analysis/Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry ((2)H-EA-IRMS) was envisaged as the method of choice for value assignment of the new CRM, as more precise (better repeatable) data might be obtained, resulting in lower uncertainty of the certified value. In order to evaluate the accuracy and intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility of (2)H-EA-IRMS methods, a laboratory inter-comparison was carried out by analysing TMU and other organic compounds, as well as some waters. The results revealed that experienced laboratories are capable of generating robust and well comparable data, which highlights the emerging potential of IRMS in food authenticity testing. However, a systematic bias between IRMS and SNIF-NMR reference data was observed for TMU; this lack of data consistency rules out the (2)H-IRMS technique for the characterisation measurement of the new TMU CRM.     

On practical metrology and chemical analysis: etalons and traceability systems

 National measurement systems are infrastructures to ensure, for each nation, a consistent and internationally recognised basis for measurement. Such complex systems have historical, technical, legal, organisational and institutional aspects to connect scientific metrology with practical measurements. Underlying any valid measurement is a chain of comparisons linking the measurement to an accepted standard. The ways the links are forged and the etalons (measurement standards) to which they connect are defining characteristics of all measurement systems. This is often referred to as traceability which aims at basing measurements in common measurement units – a key issue for the integration of quantitative chemical analysis with the evolving physical and engineering measurement systems. Adequate traceability and metrological control make possible new technical capabilities and new levels of quality assurance and confidence by users in the accuracy and integrity of quantitative analytical results. Traceability for chemical measurements is difficult to achieve and harder to demonstrate. The supply of appropriate etalons is critical to the development of metrology systems for chemical analysis. An approach is suggested that involves the development of networks of specialised reference laboratories able to make matrix-independent reference measurements on submitted samples, which may then be used as reference materials by an originating laboratory using its practical measurement procedures. Received: 31 July 1995 Accepted: 19 August 1995     

Measurement of progesterone in human serum by isotope dilution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and comparison with the commercial chemiluminescence immunoassay

Progesterone is one of the steroid hormones. The hormone is especially important in preparing the uterus for the implantation of the blastocyst and in maintaining pregnancy. Its concentration in serum is measured to determine ovarian function and to predict early pregnancy. The progesterone concentration is also important for in-vitro fertilization and embryo-transfer outcomes. We have established isotope dilution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry as a primary method for the measurement of progesterone in human serum. Progesterone and its isotopic analogue, progesterone-¹³C₂, in serum were monitored at mass transitions of m/z 315.2/109.2 and 317.2/111.2 respectively in multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with electrospray positive ionization. For validation of the method, progesterone in a National Institute of Standards and Technology standard reference material (NIST SRM) was measured, and the measured results were in good agreement with the reference values within the uncertainty. On the basis of the established method, progesterone certified reference material (CRM) was developed in this work. The certified value was (1.41 ± 0.036) μg kg⁻¹. The repeatability of 1.1% and reproducibility of 0.14% showed that ID LC–MS–MS is a reliable and reproducible method. The expanded uncertainty for the measurement of progesterone in the CRM was approximately 2.6% within 95% confidence limits. The detection limit of progesterone was approximately 0.6 μg kg⁻¹. The progesterone CRMs were distributed to representative clinical laboratories in the Republic of Korea for comparison with the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), which is the most sensitive immunoassay method. The results from the comparison showed quite a large bias among the participating laboratories. This implies that the CRM is a very important material for establishment of traceability to its practical use.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

 Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way.

This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.

     

Development of a certified reference material for the determination of acrylamide in potato chips

A certified reference material (CRM), KRISS CRM 108-10-003, has been developed for analysis of acrylamide in potato chips, as a representative of carbohydrate-rich food cooked in high-temperature oil. The material was prepared by grinding commercially available potato chips to a paste which was then homogenized, bottled in 15-g units, and stored at ?70 °C. Certification, homogeneity and stability testing, were carried out by liquid chromatography–isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ID-LC–MS). A single ID-LC–MS measurement was performed for each of 10 selected units for certification and homogeneity assessment. The mean measurement result for the 10 bottles, 0.455?±?0.012 mg?kg^?1, was assigned as the certified value of the CRM. The between-bottle homogeneity was 0.8% of the certified value. The within-bottle homogeneity, tested by measuring three replicate sub-samples from each of three randomly selected bottles, was similar to the between-bottle homogeneity. The stability of the CRM under storage conditions (?70 °C) was tested for 21 months and no change in the acrylamide content was observed within the measurement uncertainty. Stability of the CRM at –20 °C (storage at user’s site) and room temperature (for regular use and transportation) was also tested. Also presented is the newly designed procedure for evaluating the uncertainty of the certified value for the characterization scheme used in this study.