On the greatest number of 2 and 3 colorings of a (v,e)-graph

Let F denote the family of simple undirected graphs on v vertices having e edges ((v, e)-graphs) and P(λ, G) be the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. For the given integers v, e, Δ, let f(v, e, Δ) denote the greatest number of proper colorings in Δ or less colors that a (v, e)-graph G can have, i.e., f(v, e, Δ) = max{P(Δ, G): G ∈ F}. In this paper we determine f(v, e, 2) and describe all graphs G for which P(2, G) = f(v, e, 2). For f(v, e, 3), a lower bound and an upper bound are found.     

Some new bounds for the maximum number of vertex colorings of a (v,e)-graph

Let f(v, e, λ) denote the maximum number of proper vertex colorings of a graph with v vertices and e edges in λ colors. In this paper we present some new upper bounds for f(v, e, λ). In particular, a new notion of pseudo-proper colorings of a graph is given, which allows us to significantly improve the upper bounds for f(v, e, 3) given by Lazebnik and Liu in the case where e > v²/4. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 28: 115–128, 1998     

New upper bounds for the chromatic number of a graph*

We show that for any graph G, the chromatic number χ(G) ≤ Δ₂(G) + 1, where Δ₂(G) is the largest degree that a vertex ν can have subject to the condition that ν is adjacent to a vertex whose degree is at least as big as its own. Moreover, we show that the upper bound is best possible in the the following sense: If Δ₂(G) ≥ 3, then to determine whether χ(G) ≤ Δ₂(G) is an NP‐complete problem. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 117–120, 2001     

New bounds for the distance Ramsey number

In this paper we study the distance Ramsey number $R_D(s,t,d)$. The distance Ramsey number $R_D(s,t,d)$ is the minimum number $n$ such that for any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, either $G$ contains an induced $s$-vertex subgraph isomorphic to a distance graph in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ or $\stackrel{?}{G}$ contains an induced $t$-vertex subgraph isomorphic to the distance graph in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$. We obtain the upper and lower bounds on $R_D(s,s,d)$, which are similar to the bounds for the classical Ramsey number $R(?\frac{s}{[d/2]}?,?\frac{s}{[d/2]}?)$.     

New bounds for the broadcast domination number of a graph

A dominating broadcast on a graph G = (V, E) is a function f: V → {0, 1, ..., diam G} such that f(v) ≤ e(v) (the eccentricity of v) for all v ∈ V and such that each vertex is within distance f(v) from a vertex v with f(v) > 0. The cost of a broadcast f is σ(f) = Σ _v∈V f(v), and the broadcast number λ _b (G) is the minimum cost of a dominating broadcast. A set X ? V(G) is said to be irredundant if each x ∈ X dominates a vertex y that is not dominated by any other vertex in X; possibly y = x. The irredundance number ir (G) is the cardinality of a smallest maximal irredundant set of G. We prove the bound λ_b(G) ≤ 3 ir(G)/2 for any graph G and show that equality is possible for all even values of ir (G). We also consider broadcast domination as an integer programming problem, the dual of which provides a lower bound for λ_b.     

New bounds for the chromatic number of graphs

In this article we first give an upper bound for the chromatic number of a graph in terms of its degrees. This bound generalizes and modifies the bound given in 11 . Next, we obtain an upper bound of the order of magnitude for the coloring number of a graph with small K_2,t (as subgraph), where n is the order of the graph. Finally, we give some bounds for chromatic number in terms of girth and book size. These bounds improve the best known bound, in terms of order and girth, for the chromatic number of a graph when its girth is an even integer. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 58:110–122, 2008     

Exact upper bounds for the number of the polynomials with given discriminants

We generalize the result of Davenport on the sum of absolute values of discriminants of integer polynomials of degree three. For the first time, we find the exact upper bound for the number of polynomials with given discriminant in the class of cubic polynomials of bounded height for the whole interval of values of discriminants.     

Sharp upper bounds on the number of the scattering poles

We study the scattering poles of a compactly supported “black box” perturbations of the Laplacian in Rⁿ, n odd. We prove a sharp upper bound of the counting function N(r) modulo o(rⁿ) in terms of the counting function of the reference operator in the smallest ball around the black box. In the most interesting cases, we prove a bound of the type N(r)?A_nrⁿ+o(rⁿ) with an explicit A_n. We prove that this bound is sharp in a few special spherically symmetric cases where the bound turns into an asymptotic formula.     

Some bounds on the number of colors in interval and cyclic interval edge colorings of graphs

An interval$t$-coloring of a multigraph $G$ is a proper edge coloring with colors $1,\dots ,t$ such that the colors of the edges incident with every vertex of $G$ are colored by consecutive colors. A cyclic interval$t$-coloring of a multigraph $G$ is a proper edge coloring with colors $1,\dots ,t$ such that the colors of the edges incident with every vertex of $G$ are colored by consecutive colors, under the condition that color $1$ is considered as consecutive to color $t$. Denote by $w\left(G\right)$ ($w_c\left(G\right)$) and $W\left(G\right)$ ($W_c\left(G\right)$) the minimum and maximum number of colors in a (cyclic) interval coloring of a multigraph $G$, respectively. We present some new sharp bounds on $w\left(G\right)$ and $W\left(G\right)$ for multigraphs $G$ satisfying various conditions. In particular, we show that if $G$ is a $2$-connected multigraph with an interval coloring, then $W\left(G\right)\le 1+?\frac{\left|V\left(G\right)\right|}{2}?(\Delta \left(G\right)?1)$. We also give several results towards the general conjecture that $W_c\left(G\right)\le \left|V\left(G\right)\right|$ for any triangle-free graph $G$ with a cyclic interval coloring; we establish that approximate versions of this conjecture hold for several families of graphs, and we prove that the conjecture is true for graphs with maximum degree at most $4$.     

New upper bounds for stop-loss premiums for the individual model

An analytical expression for an upper bound of the stop-loss premium for the individual model is given.     

Upper bounds on the signed (k, k)-domatic number

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G), and let f : V(G) → {?1, 1} be a two-valued function. If k ≥ 1 is an integer and ${\sum_{x\in N[v]} f(x) \ge k}$ for each ${v \in V(G)}$ , where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v, then f is a signed k-dominating function on G. A set {f ₁,f ₂, . . . ,f _d } of distinct signed k-dominating functions on G with the property that ${\sum_{i=1}^d f_i(x) \le k}$ for each ${x \in V(G)}$ , is called a signed (k, k)-dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed (k, k)-dominating family on G is the signed (k, k)-domatic number of G. In this article we mainly present upper bounds on the signed (k, k)-domatic number, in particular for regular graphs.     

New results on lower bounds for the number of -facets

In this paper we present two different results dealing with the number of (≤k)-facets of a set of points:

1. We give structural properties of sets in the plane that achieve the optimal lower bound of (≤k)-edges for a fixed 0≤k≤n/3−1; and

2. we show that, for k<n/(d+1), the number of (≤k)-facets of a set of n points in general position in is at least , and that this bound is tight in the given range of k.

On the Factorizations of （mg, mf）-graph

Let G be an (mg, mf)-graph, where g and f are integer-valued functions defined on V(G) and such that 0≤g(x)≤f(x) for each x ∈ V(G). It is proved that(1) If Z ≠ , both g and f may be not even, G has a (g, f)-factorization, where Z = {x ∈ V(G): mf(x)-dG(x)≤t(x) or dG(x)-mg(x)≤ t(x), t(x)= f(x)-g(x)>0}.(2) Let G be an m-regular graph with 2n vertices, m≥n. If (P1, P2,..., Pr) is a partition of m, P1 ≡ m (mod 2), Pi ≡ 0 (mod 2), i = 2,..., r, then the edge set E(G) of G can be parted into r parts E1 , E2,...,Er of E(G) such that G[Ei] is a Pi-factor of G.     

Upper bounds on the upper signed total domination number of graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A function f:V→{−1,+1} defined on the vertices of G is a signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. A signed total dominating function f is minimal if there does not exist a signed total dominating function g, f≠g, for which g(v)≤f(v) for every v∈V. The weight of a signed total dominating function is the sum of its function values over all vertices of G. The upper signed total domination number of G is the maximum weight of a minimal signed total dominating function on G. In this paper we present a sharp upper bound on the upper signed total domination number of an arbitrary graph. This result generalizes previous results for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs.     

New upper bounds for Estrada index of bipartite graphs

Suppose G is a graph and λ₁,λ₂,…,λ_n are the eigenvalues of G. The Estrada index EE(G) of G is defined as the sum of e^λ_i, 1≤i≤n. In this paper some new upper bounds for the Estrada index of bipartite graphs are presented. We apply our result on a (4,6)-fullerene to improve our bound given in an earlier paper.