Group divisible designs with block size four and two groups

We give some constructions of new infinite families of group divisible designs, GDD(n,2,4;λ₁,λ₂), including one which uses the existence of Bhaskar Rao designs. We show the necessary conditions are sufficient for 3?n?8. For n=10 there is one missing critical design. If λ₁>λ₂, then the necessary conditions are sufficient for . For each of n=10,15,16,17,18,19, and 20 we indicate a small minimal set of critical designs which, if they exist, would allow construction of all possible designs for that n. The indices of each of these designs are also among those critical indices for every n in the same congruence class mod 12.     

Embeddings of resolvable group divisible designs with block size 3

It is proved in this paper that an RGD(3, g;v) can be embedded in an RGD(3, g;u) if and only if , , , v ≥ 3g, u ≥ 3v, and (g,v) ≠ (2,6),(2,12),(6,18).     

Resolvable balanced incomplete block designs with subdesigns of block size 4

In this paper, we look at resolvable balanced incomplete block designs on v points having blocks of size 4, briefly (v,4,1) RBIBDs. The problem we investigate is the existence of (v,4,1) RBIBDs containing a (w,4,1) RBIBD as a subdesign. We also require that each parallel class of the subdesign should be in a single parallel class of the containing design. Removing the subdesign gives an incomplete RBIBD, i.e., an IRB(v,w). The necessary conditions for the existence of an IRB(v,w) are that v?4w and . We show these conditions are sufficient with a finite number (179) of exceptions, and in particular whenever and whenever w?1852.We also give some results on pairwise balanced designs on v points containing (at least one) block of size w, i.e., a (v,{K,w^*},1)-PBD.If the list of permitted block sizes, K₅, contains all integers of size 5 or more, and v,w∈K₅, then a necessary condition on this PBD is v?4w+1. We show this condition is not sufficient for any w?5 and give the complete spectrum (in v) for 5?w?8, as well as showing the condition v?5w is sufficient with some definite exceptions for w=5 and 6, and some possible exceptions when w=15, namely 77?v?79. The existence of this PBD implies the existence of an IRB(12v+4,12w+4).If the list of permitted block sizes, K₁₍₄₎, contains all integers , and v,w∈K₁₍₄₎, then a necessary condition on this PBD is v?4w+1. We show this condition is sufficient with a finite number of possible exceptions, and in particular is sufficient when w?1037. The existence of this PBD implies the existence of an IRB(3v+1,3w+1).     

On covering designs with block size 5 and index 5

LetV be a finite set of order . A (, , ) covering design of index and block size is a collection of -element subsets, called blocks, such that every 2-subset ofV occurs in at least blocks. The covering problem is to determine the minimum number of blocks, (, , ), in a covering design. It is well known that , where [x] is the smallest integer satisfyingx[X]. It is shown here that (, 5, 5)=(, 5, 5) for all positive integers 5 with the possible exception of =24, 28, 56, 104, 124, 144, 164, 184.     

Uniformly resolvable designs with index one and block sizes three and four — with three or five parallel classes of block size four

Each parallel class of a uniformly resolvable design (URD) contains blocks of only one block size. A URD with v points and with block sizes three and four means that at least one parallel class has block size three and at least one has block size four. Danziger [P. Danziger, Uniform restricted resolvable designs with r=3, ARS Combin. 46 (1997) 161-176] proved that for all there exist URDs with index one, some parallel classes of block size three, and exactly three parallel classes with block size four, except when v=12 and except possibly when . We extend Danziger’s work by showing that there exists a URD with index one, some parallel classes with block size three, and exactly three parallel classes with block size four if, and only if, , v≠12. We also prove that there exists a URD with index one, some parallel classes of block size three, and exactly five parallel classes with block size four if, and only if, , v≠12. New labeled URDs, which give new URDs as ingredient designs for recursive constructions, are the key in the proofs. Some ingredient URDs are also constructed with difference families.     

Super-simple balanced incomplete block designs with block size 4 and index 5

In statistical planning of experiments, super-simple designs are the ones providing samples with maximum intersection as small as possible. Super-simple designs are also useful in other constructions, such as superimposed codes and perfect hash families etc. The existence of super-simple (v,4,λ)-BIBDs have been determined for λ=2,3,4 and 6. When λ=5, the necessary conditions of such a design are that and v≥13. In this paper, we show that there exists a super-simple (v,4,5)-BIBD for each and v≥13.     

On small packing and covering designs with block size 4

A packing (respectively covering) design of order v, block size k, and index λ is a collection of k-element subsets, called blocks, of a v-set, V, such that every 2-subset of V occurs in at most (at least) λ blocks. The packing (covering) problem is to determine the maximum (minimum) number of blocks in a packing (covering) design. Motivated by the recent work of Assaf [1] [2], we solve the outstanding packing and covering problems with block size 4.     

Super-simple group divisible designs with block size 4 and index 5

In this paper, we investigate the existence of a super-simple (4, 5)-GDD of type g^u and show that such a design exists if and only if u≥4, g(u−2)≥10, and .     

Maximum uniformly resolvable designs with block sizes 2 and 4

A central question in design theory dating from Kirkman in 1850 has been the existence of resolvable block designs. In this paper we will concentrate on the case when the block size k=4. The necessary condition for a resolvable design to exist when k=4 is that v≡4mod12; this was proven sufficient in 1972 by Hanani, Ray-Chaudhuri and Wilson [H. Hanani, D.K. Ray-Chaudhuri, R.M. Wilson, On resolvable designs, Discrete Math. 3 (1972) 343-357]. A resolvable pairwise balanced design with each parallel class consisting of blocks which are all of the same size is called a uniformly resolvable design, a URD. The necessary condition for the existence of a URD with block sizes 2 and 4 is that v≡0mod4. Obviously in a URD with blocks of size 2 and 4 one wishes to have the maximum number of resolution classes of blocks of size 4; these designs are called maximum uniformly resolvable designs or MURDs. So the question of the existence of a MURD on v points has been solved for by the result of Hanani, Ray-Chaudhuri and Wilson cited above. In the case this problem has essentially been solved with a handful of exceptions (see [G. Ge, A.C.H. Ling, Asymptotic results on the existence of 4-RGDDs and uniform 5-GDDs, J. Combin. Des. 13 (2005) 222-237]). In this paper we consider the case when and prove that a exists for all u≥2 with the possible exception of u∈{2,7,9,10,11,13,14,17,19,22,31,34,38,43,46,47,82}.     

Uniformly resolvable designs with index one, block sizes three and five and up to five parallel classes with blocks of size five

Each parallel class of a uniformly resolvable design (URD) contains blocks of only one block size k (denoted k-pc). The number of k-pcs is denoted r_k. The necessary conditions for URDs with v points, index one, blocks of size 3 and 5, and r₃,r₅>0, are . If r_k>1, then v≥k², and r₃=(v−1−4⋅r₅)/2. For r₅=1 these URDs are known as group divisible designs. We prove that these necessary conditions are sufficient for r₅=3 except possibly v=105, and for r₅=2,4,5 with possible exceptions (v=105,165,285,345) New labeled frames and labeled URDs, which give new URDs as ingredient designs for recursive constructions, are the key in the proofs.     

Realizations for direct constructions of resolvable Steiner 2‐designs with block size 5

We consider direct constructions due to R. J. R. Abel and M. Greig, and to M. Buratti, for ({ν},5,1) balanced incomplete block designs. These designs are defined using the prime fields F_p for certain primes p, are 1‐rotational over G ⊕ F_p where G is a group of order 4, and are also resolvable under certain conditions. We introduce specifications to the constructions and, by means of character sum arguments, show that the constructions yield resolvable designs whenever p is sufficiently large. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Combin Designs 8:207–217, 2000     

Existence of generalized Bhaskar Rao designs with block size 3

There are well-known necessary conditions for the existence of a generalized Bhaskar Rao design over a group G, with block size k=3. The recently proved Hall-Paige conjecture shows that these are sufficient when v=3 and λ=|G|. We prove these conditions are sufficient in general when v=3, and also when |G| is small, or when G is dicyclic. We summarize known results supporting the conjecture that these necessary conditions are always sufficient when k=3.     

Incomplete group divisible designs with block size four and general index

In this paper, we investigate the existence of incomplete group divisible designs (IGDDs) with block size four, group-type (g, h) u and general index λ. The necessary conditions for the existence of such a design are that u ≥ 4, g ≥ 3h, λg(u 1) ≡ 0 (mod 3), λ(g h)(u 1) ≡ 0 (mod 3), and λu(u 1)(g 2 h 2 ) ≡ 0 (mod 12). These necessary conditions are shown to be sufficient for all λ≥ 2. The known existence result for λ = 1 is also improved.     

New upper bounds on the minimum size of covering designs

Let D = {B₁, B₂,…, B_b} be a finite family of k-subsets (called blocks ) of a v-set X(v) = {1, 2,…, v} (with elements called points ). Then D is a (v, k, t) covering design or covering if every t-subset of X(v) is contained in at least one block of D. The number of blocks, b, is the size of the covering, and the minimum size of the covering is called the covering number , denoted C(v, k, t). This article is concerned with new constructions of coverings. The constructions improve many upper bounds on the covering number C(v, k, t) © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Combin Designs 6:21–41, 1998     

Resolvability of infinite designs

In this paper we examine the resolvability of infinite designs. We show that in stark contrast to the finite case, resolvability for infinite designs is fairly commonplace. We prove that every t  -(v,k,Λ)$(v,k,\Lambda )$ design with t finite, v   infinite and k,λ<v$k,\lambda <v$ is resolvable and, in fact, has α   orthogonal resolutions for each α<v$\alpha <v$. We also show that, while a t  -(v,k,Λ)$(v,k,\Lambda )$ design with t and λ finite, v   infinite and k=v$k=v$ may or may not have a resolution, any resolution of such a design must have v parallel classes containing v   blocks and at most λ−1$\lambda -1$ parallel classes containing fewer than v   blocks. Further, a resolution into parallel classes of any specified sizes obeying these conditions is realisable in some design. When k<v$k<v$ and λ=v$\lambda =v$ and when k=v$k=v$ and λ is infinite, we give various examples of resolvable and non-resolvable t  -(v,k,Λ)$(v,k,\Lambda )$ designs.