Maximum nullity of outerplanar graphs and the path cover number

Let G=(V,E) be a graph with V={1,2,…,n}. Define S(G) as the set of all n×n real-valued symmetric matrices A=[a_ij] with a_ij≠0,i≠j if and only if ij∈E. By M(G) we denote the largest possible nullity of any matrix A∈S(G). The path cover number of a graph G, denoted P(G), is the minimum number of vertex disjoint paths occurring as induced subgraphs of G which cover all the vertices of G.There has been some success with relating the path cover number of a graph to its maximum nullity. Johnson and Duarte [5], have shown that for a tree T,M(T)=P(T). Barioli et al. [2], show that for a unicyclic graph G,M(G)=P(G) or M(G)=P(G)-1. Notice that both families of graphs are outerplanar. We show that for any outerplanar graph G,M(G)?P(G). Further we show that for any partial 2-path G,M(G)=P(G).     

The total chromatic number of Pseudo-Halin graphs with lower degree

The total chromatic number χ_T(G) of a graph G is the least number of colors needed to color the vertices and the edges of G such that no adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. The Total Coloring Conjecture(TCC) states that for every simple graph G, χ_T(G)≤Δ(G)+2. In this paper, we show that χ_T(G)=Δ(G)+1 for all pseudo-Halin graphs with Δ(G)=4 and 5.     

Total chromatic number of one kind of join graphs

The total chromatic number χ_T(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of colors needed to color the elements (vertices and edges) of G such that no adjacent or incident pair of elements receive the same color. G is called Type 1 if χ_T(G)=Δ(G)+1. In this paper we prove that the join of a complete inequibipartite graph K_n1,n2 and a path P_m is of Type 1.     

Independence and coloring properties of direct products of some vertex-transitive graphs

Let α(G) and χ(G) denote the independence number and chromatic number of a graph G, respectively. Let G×H be the direct product graph of graphs G and H. We show that if G and H are circular graphs, Kneser graphs, or powers of cycles, then α(G×H)=max{α(G)|V(H)|,α(H)|V(G)|} and χ(G×H)=min{χ(G),χ(H)}.     

On a Heilbronn-type problem

Let F be a convex figure with area |F| and let G(n,F) denote the smallest number such that from any n points of F we can get G(n,F) triangles with areas less than or equal to |F|/4. In this article, to generalize some results of Soifer, we will prove that for any triangle T, G(5,T)=3; for any parallelogram P, G(5,P)=2; for any convex figure F, if S(F)=6, then G(6,F)=4.     

Total domination subdivision numbers of trees

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S. The total domination number γ_t(G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision number sd_γt(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (where each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Haynes et al. (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 44 (2003) 115) showed that for any tree T of order at least 3, 1?sd_γt(T)?3. In this paper, we give a constructive characterization of trees whose total domination subdivision number is 3.     

A Generalization of the Gallai–Roy Theorem

 A well-known and essential result due to Roy ([4], 1967) and independently to Gallai ([3], 1968) is that if D is a digraph with chromatic number χ(D), then D contains a directed path of at least χ(D) vertices. We generalize this result by showing that if ψ(D) is the minimum value of the number of the vertices in a longest directed path starting from a vertex that is connected to every vertex of D, then χ(D) ≤ψ(D). For graphs, we give a positive answer to the following question of Fajtlowicz: if G is a graph with chromatic number χ(G), then for any proper coloring of G of χ(G) colors and for any vertex v∈V(G), there is a path P starting at v which represents all χ(G) colors. Received: May 20, 1999 Final version received: December 24, 1999     

Heterochromatic tree partition numbers for complete bipartite graphs

An r-edge-coloring of a graph G is a surjective assignment of r colors to the edges of G. A heterochromatic tree is an edge-colored tree in which any two edges have different colors. The heterochromatic tree partition number of an r-edge-colored graph G, denoted by t_r(G), is the minimum positive integer p such that whenever the edges of the graph G are colored with r colors, the vertices of G can be covered by at most p vertex-disjoint heterochromatic trees. In this paper we give an explicit formula for the heterochromatic tree partition number of an r-edge-colored complete bipartite graph K_m,n.     

Colouring games on outerplanar graphs and trees

Let f be a graph function which assigns to each graph H a non-negative integer f(H)≤|V(H)|. The f-game chromatic number of a graph G is defined through a two-person game. Let X be a set of colours. Two players, Alice and Bob, take turns colouring the vertices of G with colours from X. A partial colouring c of G is legal (with respect to graph function f) if for any subgraph H of G, the sum of the number of colours used in H and the number of uncoloured vertices of H is at least f(H). Both Alice and Bob must colour legally (i.e., the partial colouring produced needs to be legal). The game ends if either all the vertices are coloured or there are uncoloured vertices with no legal colour. In the former case, Alice wins the game. In the latter case, Bob wins the game. The f-game chromatic number of G, χ_g(f,G), is the least number of colours that the colour set X needs to contain so that Alice has a winning strategy. Let be the graph function defined as , for any n≥3 and otherwise. Then is called the acyclic game chromatic number of G. In this paper, we prove that any outerplanar graph G has acyclic game chromatic number at most 7. For any integer k, let ?_k be the graph function defined as ?_k(K₂)=2 and ?_k(P_k)=3 (P_k is the path on k vertices) and ?_k(H)=0 otherwise. This paper proves that if k≥8 then for any tree T, χ_g(?_k,T)≤9. On the other hand, if k≤6, then for any integer n, there is a tree T such that χ_g(?_k,T)≥n.     

Upper bounds on vertex distinguishing chromatic index of some Halin graphs

A vertex distinguishing edge coloring of a graph G is a proper edge coloring of G such that any pair of vertices has the distinct sets of colors. The minimum number of colors required for a vertex distinguishing edge coloring of a graph G is denoted by ???? _s (G). In this paper, we obtained upper bounds on the vertex distinguishing chromatic index of 3-regular Halin graphs and Halin graphs with ??(G) ?? 4, respectively.     

Steiner intervals and Steiner geodetic numbers in distance-hereditary graphs

A Steiner tree for a set S of vertices in a connected graph G is a connected subgraph of G with a smallest number of edges that contains S. The Steiner interval I(S) of S is the union of all the vertices of G that belong to some Steiner tree for S. If S={u,v}, then I(S)=I[u,v] is called the interval between u and v and consists of all vertices that lie on some shortest u-v path in G. The smallest cardinality of a set S of vertices such that ?_u,v∈SI[u,v]=V(G) is called the geodetic number and is denoted by g(G). The smallest cardinality of a set S of vertices of G such that I(S)=V(G) is called the Steiner geodetic number of G and is denoted by sg(G). We show that for distance-hereditary graphs g(G)?sg(G) but that g(G)/sg(G) can be arbitrarily large if G is not distance hereditary. An efficient algorithm for finding the Steiner interval for a set of vertices in a distance-hereditary graph is described and it is shown how contour vertices can be used in developing an efficient algorithm for finding the Steiner geodetic number of a distance-hereditary graph.     

Incidence coloring of the squares of some graphs

The incidence chromatic number of G, denoted by χ_i(G), is the least number of colors such that G has an incidence coloring. In this paper, we determine the incidence chromatic number of the powers of paths, trees, which are min{n,2k+1}, and Δ(T²)+1, respectively. For the square of a Halin graph, we give an upper bound of its incidence chromatic number.     

Geodetic and Steiner geodetic sets in 3-Steiner distance hereditary graphs

Let G be a connected graph and S⊆V(G). Then the Steiner distance of S, denoted by d_G(S), is the smallest number of edges in a connected subgraph of G containing S. Such a subgraph is necessarily a tree called a Steiner tree for S. The Steiner interval for a set S of vertices in a graph, denoted by I(S) is the union of all vertices that belong to some Steiner tree for S. If S={u,v}, then I(S) is the interval I[u,v] between u and v. A connected graph G is 3-Steiner distance hereditary (3-SDH) if, for every connected induced subgraph H of order at least 3 and every set S of three vertices of H, d_H(S)=d_G(S). The eccentricity of a vertex v in a connected graph G is defined as e(v)=max{d(v,x)|x∈V(G)}. A vertex v in a graph G is a contour vertex if for every vertex u adjacent with v, e(u)?e(v). The closure of a set S of vertices, denoted by I[S], is defined to be the union of intervals between pairs of vertices of S taken over all pairs of vertices in S. A set of vertices of a graph G is a geodetic set if its closure is the vertex set of G. The smallest cardinality of a geodetic set of G is called the geodetic number of G and is denoted by g(G). A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is a Steiner geodetic set for G if I(S)=V(G). The smallest cardinality of a Steiner geodetic set of G is called the Steiner geodetic number of G and is denoted by sg(G). We show that the contour vertices of 3-SDH and HHD-free graphs are geodetic sets. For 3-SDH graphs we also show that g(G)?sg(G). An efficient algorithm for finding Steiner intervals in 3-SDH graphs is developed.     

Dynamic list coloring of bipartite graphs

A dynamic coloring of a graph is a proper coloring of its vertices such that every vertex of degree more than one has at least two neighbors with distinct colors. The least number of colors in a dynamic coloring of G, denoted by χ₂(G), is called the dynamic chromatic number of G. The least integer k, such that if every vertex of G is assigned a list of k colors, then G has a proper (resp. dynamic) coloring in which every vertex receives a color from its own list, is called the choice number of G, denoted by ch(G) (resp. the dynamic choice number, denoted by ch₂(G)). It was recently conjectured (Akbari et al. (2009) [1]) that for any graph G, ch₂(G)=max(ch(G),χ₂(G)). In this short note we disprove this conjecture. We first give an example of a small planar bipartite graph G with ch(G)=χ₂(G)=3 and ch₂(G)=4. Then, for any integer k≥5, we construct a bipartite graph G_k such that ch(G_k)=χ₂(G_k)=3 and ch₂(G)≥k.     

Chromatic number, clique subdivisions, and the conjectures of Hajós and Erdős-Fajtlowicz

For a graph G, let χ(G) denote its chromatic number and σ(G) denote the order of the largest clique subdivision in G. Let H(n) be the maximum of χ(G)=σ(G) over all n-vertex graphs G. A famous conjecture of Hajós from 1961 states that σ(G) ≥ χ(G) for every graph G. That is, H(n)≤1 for all positive integers n. This conjecture was disproved by Catlin in 1979. Erd?s and Fajtlowicz further showed by considering a random graph that H(n)≥cn ^1/2/logn for some absolute constant c>0. In 1981 they conjectured that this bound is tight up to a constant factor in that there is some absolute constant C such that χ(G)=σ(G) ≤ Cn ^1/2/logn for all n-vertex graphs G. In this paper we prove the Erd?s-Fajtlowicz conjecture. The main ingredient in our proof, which might be of independent interest, is an estimate on the order of the largest clique subdivision which one can find in every graph on n vertices with independence number α.     

Characterization of double domination subdivision number of trees

In a graph G, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbors. A subset S⊆V(G) is a double dominating set of G if S dominates every vertex of G at least twice. The double domination numberdd(G) is the minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of G. The double domination subdivision numbersd_dd(G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the double domination number. In this paper first we establish upper bounds on the double domination subdivision number for arbitrary graphs in terms of vertex degree. Then we present several different conditions on G which are sufficient to imply that sd_dd(G)?3. We also prove that 1?sd_dd(T)?2 for every tree T, and characterize the trees T for which sd_dd(T)=2.     

Chromaticity of certain tripartite graphs identified with a path

For a graph G, let P(G) be its chromatic polynomial. Two graphs G and H are chromatically equivalent if P(G)=P(H). A graph G is chromatically unique if P(H)=P(G) implies that H≅G. In this paper, we classify the chromatic classes of graphs obtained from K_2,2,2∪P_m(m?3), (K_2,2,2-e)∪P_m(m?5) and (K_2,2,2-2e)∪P_m(m?6) by identifying the end-vertices of the path P_m with any two vertices of K_2,2,2, K_2,2,2-e and K_2,2,2-2e, respectively, where e and 2e are, respectively, an edge and any two edges of K_2,2,2. As a by-product of this, we obtain some families of chromatically unique and chromatically equivalent classes of graphs.     

On the nullity and the matching number of unicyclic graphs

Let G be a graph with n vertices and ν(G) be the matching number of G. Let η(G) denote the nullity of G (the multiplicity of the eigenvalue zero of G). It is well known that if G is a tree, then η(G)=n-2ν(G). Tan and Liu [X. Tan, B. Liu, On the nullity of unicyclic graphs, Linear Alg. Appl. 408 (2005) 212-220] proved that the nullity set of all unicyclic graphs with n vertices is {0,1,…,n-4} and characterized the unicyclic graphs with η(G)=n-4. In this paper, we characterize the unicyclic graphs with η(G)=n-5, and we prove that if G is a unicyclic graph, then η(G) equals , or n-2ν(G)+2. We also give a characterization of these three types of graphs. Furthermore, we determine the unicyclic graphs G with η(G)=0, which answers affirmatively an open problem by Tan and Liu.     

Connected graphs with maximal Q-index: The one-dominating-vertex case

By the signless Laplacian of a (simple) graph G we mean the matrix Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), where A(G),D(G) denote respectively the adjacency matrix and the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees of G. For every pair of positive integers n,k, it is proved that if 3?k?n-3, then H_n,k, the graph obtained from the star K_1,n-1 by joining a vertex of degree 1 to k+1 other vertices of degree 1, is the unique connected graph that maximizes the largest signless Laplacian eigenvalue over all connected graphs with n vertices and n+k edges.     

On upper bounds of bandwidths of trees

ＯＮＵＰＰＥＲＢＯＵＮＤＳＯＦＢＡＮＤＷＩＤＴＨＳＯＦＴＲＥＥＳＷＡＮＧＪＩＡＮＦＡＮＧ（王建方）（ＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＡｐｐｌｉｅｄＭａｔｈｅｍａｔｉｃｓ,ｔｈｅＣｈｉｎｅｓｅＡｃａｄｅｍｙｏｆＳｃｉｅｎｃｅｓ,Ｂｅｉｊｉｎｇ１０００８０,Ｃｈｉ...