Recent advances and trends in miniaturized sample preparation techniques

Advances in the area of sample preparation are significant and have been growing significantly in recent years. This initial step of the analysis is essential and must be carried out properly, consisting of a complicated procedure with multiple stages. Consequently, it corresponds to a potential source of errors and will determine, at the end of the process, either a satisfactory result or a fail. One of the advances in this field includes the miniaturization of extraction techniques based on the conventional sample preparation procedures such as liquid‐liquid extraction and solid‐phase extraction. These modern techniques have gained prominence in the face of traditional methods since they minimize the consumption of organic solvents and the sample volume. As another feature, it is possible to reuse the sorbents, and its coupling to chromatographic systems might be automated. The review will emphasize the main techniques based on liquid‐phase microextraction, as well as those based upon the use of sorbents. The first group includes currently popular techniques such as single drop microextraction, hollow fiber liquid‐phase microextraction, and dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction. In the second group, solid‐phase microextraction techniques such as in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, dispersive solid‐phase extraction, dispersive micro solid‐phase microextraction, and microextraction by packed sorbent are highlighted. These approaches, in common, aim the determination of analytes at low concentrations in complex matrices. This article describes some characteristics, recent advances, and trends on miniaturized sample preparation techniques, as well as their current applications in food, environmental, and bioanalysis fields.     

Microextraction sample preparation techniques in forensic analytical toxicology

Sample preparation is a critical step in forensic analytical toxicology. Different extraction techniques are employed with the goals of removing interferences from the biological samples, such as blood, tissues and hair, reducing matrix effects and concentrating the target analytes, among others. With the objective of developing faster and more ecological procedures, microextraction techniques have been expanding their applications in the recent years. This article reviews various microextraction methods, which include solid‐based microextraction, such as solid‐phase microextraction, microextraction by packed sorbent and stir‐bar sorptive extraction, and liquid‐based microextraction, such as single drop/hollow fiber‐based liquid‐phase microextraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, as well as their applications to forensic toxicology analysis. The development trend in future microextraction sample preparation is discussed.     

Analysis of Dichlorobenzene in Water by Solid‐Phase Microextraction

The solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) technique using a 100 μm film polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated fiber has been examined with the aim to determine dichlorobenzene in aqueous samples. The feasibility of SPME‐GC‐ECD analysis has been evaluated. Absorption time of 30 min was selected and 1 min was long enough for complete desorption of the analytes in the injection port of the gas chromatograph. Linear ranges from 0.03 to 5 μg/L and method detection limits between 7 and 9 ng/L for dichlorobenzenes were obtained. The relative standard deviations were less than 12% for a spiking level of 3 μg/L. The proposed method was applied to determine dichlorobenzenes in spiked deionized water, ground water, and in industrial effluent samples.     

New developments in microextraction techniques in bioanalysis. A review

In recent years, the interest in new extraction methods with lower sample volume requirements, simpler equipment and handling, and lower reagent consumption, has led to the development of a series of microextraction methods based on extraction phases in the microliter order. Nowadays, many references can be found for several of these methods, which imply a wide range of applications referred to both the analyte and the sample nature. In this paper, recent developments in both well-established microextraction techniques (solid phase microextraction, hollow-fiber liquid phase microextraction, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, etc.) and recently appeared microextraction procedures (nanoextraction systems, microchip devices, etc.) for the clinical analysis of biological samples will be reviewed and discussed.     

分子印迹样品前处理技术的研究进展

样品前处理是分析过程的关键环节,直接影响着分析结果的准确度和精密度．分子印迹聚合物具有特异性识别能力,能从复杂样品中选择性分离富集目标物,在复杂样品前处理领域中有重要的发展潜力和应用前景．本文综述了近年来分子印迹样品前处理技术的研究进展,包括分子印迹固相萃取、分子印迹固相微萃取、分子印迹膜萃取等样品前处理技术．     

固相微萃取研究进展

对固相微萃取的发展背景，应用及其研究进展作了综述。引用文献 145篇。     

Sol-gel microextraction phases for sample preconcentration in chromatographic analysis

Sol-gel technology provides a simple and reliable method for solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber preparation through in situ creation of surface-bonded organic-inorganic hybrid coatings characterized by enhanced thermal stability and solvent-resistance properties that are important for the coupling of SPME with GC and HPLC, respectively. The sol-gel coating technology has led to the development of an extensive array of sol-gel sorbent coatings for SPME. In this article, sol-gel microextraction coatings are reviewed, with particular attention on their synthesis, characterization, and applications in conjunction with GC and HPLC analyses. In addition, the development of sol-gel-coated stir bars, their inherent advantages, and applications are discussed. Next, the development and applications of sol-gel capillary microextraction (CME) in hyphenation with GC and HPLC is extensively reviewed. The newly emerging germania- and titania-based sol-gel microextraction phases look promising, especially in terms of pH and hot solvent stability. Finally, sol-gel monolithic beds for CME are reviewed. Such monolithic beds are in a position to greatly improve the extracting capabilities and enhanced sensitivity in CME.     

Introduction of solid-phase microextraction as a high-throughput sample preparation tool in laboratory analysis of prohibited substances

A fully automated, high-throughput method based on thin-film solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was developed for simultaneous quantitative analysis of 110 doping compounds, selected from ten classes and varying in physical and chemical properties. Among four tested extraction phases, C18 blades were chosen, as they provided optimum recoveries and the lowest carryover effect. The SPME method was optimized in terms of extraction pH, ionic strength of the sample, washing solution, extraction and desorption times for analysis of urine samples. Chromatographic separation was obtained in reversed-phase model; for detection, two mass spectrometers were used: triple quadrupole and full scan orbitrap. These combinations allowed for selective analysis of targeted compounds, as well as a retrospective study for known and unknown compounds. The developed method was validated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria, taking into account Minimum Required Performance Level (MRPL) values required by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). In addition to analysis of free substances, it was also shown that the proposed method is able to extract the glucuronated forms of the compounds. The developed assay offers fast and reliable analysis of various prohibited substances, an attractive alternative to the standard methods that are currently used in anti-doping laboratories.     

固相微萃取在生物-医药分析领域中的应用

对固相微萃取在生物－医药分析领域的研究发展进行综述，引用文献42篇。     

Basic principles,recent trends and future directions of microextraction techniques for the analysis of aqueous environmental samples

Microextraction-based sample preparation techniques have exhibited remarkable importance in analytical chemistry since they were first developed in the 1980s. The application of these techniques involves efficient and, at the same time, environmentally-friendly analytical methodologies. They are also generally faster when compared with classical sample preparation techniques, requiring low solvent and sample volumes, and also allowing for automated or semi-automated procedures. This paper provides an overview of the basic principles of sample preparation techniques and the important applications and developments that have taken place in this area over the past five years. These procedures include solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), bar adsorptive microextraction (BAμE), rotating disk sorptive extraction (RDSE), micro solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) and liquid-phase microextraction (LPME). The main variations are discussed with a focus on recent applications in the analysis of environmental water samples. Lastly, some of the trends and perspectives associated with these outstanding microextraction sample preparation approaches are highlighted.     

A glance at achievements in the coupling of headspace and direct immersion single‐drop microextraction with chromatographic techniques

The present article offers a glance at achievements in single‐drop microextraction(SDME), with a focus on the two most commonly used modes of this technique: headspace and direct immersion. Factors affecting SDME, such as the pH and ionic strength of the sample solution, the stirring rate, and the extraction time are briefly summarized. The requirements for the acceptor phase and the influence of the sampling temperature are presented. In addition, the potential of the application of microwave and ultrasonic energy in SDME is also discussed. Examples of the application of the headspace and direct immersion modes of SDME are given in a table as additional Supporting Information.     

固相微萃取及其与某些分析技术联用

评述了固相微萃取技术的特点、理论、表面涂层材料和方法的建立 ,以及与一些分析技术的联用     

Determination of diphenylether herbicides in water samples by solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to LC for the analysis of five diphenylether herbicides (aclonifen, bifenox, fluoroglycofen-ethyl, oxyfluorfen, and lactofen) is described. Various parameters of extraction of analytes onto the fiber (such as type of fiber, extraction time and temperature, pH, impact of salt and organic solute) and desorption from the fiber in the desorption chamber prior to separation (such as type and composition of desorption solvent, desorption mode, soaking time, and flush-out time) were studied and optimized. Four commercially available SPME fibers were studied. PDMS/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB, 60 microm) and carbowax/ templated resin (CW/TPR, 50 microm) fibers were selected due to better extraction efficiencies. Repeatability (RSD, < 7%), correlation coefficient (> 0.994), and detection limit (0.33-1.74 and 0.22-1.94 ng/mL, respectively, for PDMS/DVB and CW/TPR) were investigated. Relative recovery (81-104% for PDMS/DVB and 83-100% for CW/TPR fiber) values have also been calculated. The developed method was successfully applied to the analysis of river water and water collected from a vegetable garden.     

Preparation and characterization of microporous fibers for sample preparation and LC‐MS determination of drugs

The aim of this study was the preparation of polypyrrole (PPy) fibers for solid phase microextraction (SPME). PPy coatings were obtained during the electrochemical polymerization process. The utility of various metal wires (Fe, Cu, Ag, Cu/Ag, kanthal and medical stainless steel) as a support for polymers was compared. Various experimental conditions of the synthesis process such as scan rate, voltage limits and number of scans and deposition time were applied. The average polymer thickness was in the range of 7–125 μm and its weight was in the scope of 0.65–5.6 mg. Different techniques, mainly elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, microscopy, and chromatography were performed for the characterization of obtained fibers with microporous structure. The extraction efficiency of cardiovascular drugs (metoprolol, propranolol, oxprenolol, propafenone and mexiletine) by means of fibers was tested. The concentration of mentioned compounds in standard solution was in the span of 10–150 ng/mL. LC‐MS was employed for determination of drugs in desorption solution. LODs varied from 0.013 to 1.51 ng/mL for metoprolol and mexiletine respectively. The repeatability of extraction was obtained with the RSD values lower than 10%.     

Novel sample preparation approaches in gas chromatographic analysis: Promising ideas

The development of sample preparation procedures is still a dynamic process despite a number of already proposed techniques. The main challenge in this research field is to fully replace classical procedures like liquid‐liquid extraction and solid‐phase extraction in gas chromatographic analysis. Some progress has been already achieved for the last 20 years when miniaturized techniques were incorporated in ISO standards. The current review is focused on novel approaches in sample treatment that appeared since 2010. It includes research studies describing non‐conventional instrumental design available to inspire future progress in the field. A combination of a few extraction principles and supporting with additional treatment are the main core suggested for improvement of sample preparation efficiency. This requires good compatibility of extraction media, assessment of multiple experimental parameters, and potential automatization possibilities.     

水中氯苯系化合物的固相微萃取

研究了用固相微萃取装置直接从水中萃取氯苯系化合物的条件,试验表明室温下萃取２５～３５ｍｉｎ效果最佳。随着氯苯系化合物含量的增大响应值变化越来越不明显,因此,固相微萃取装置适用于做痕量分析,该法对于氯苯系化合物的应用范围为：１,２,４－三氯苯、１,２,３,５－四氯苯为０～４０ｕｇ／Ｌ、１,２,３,４－四氯苯、１,２,４,５－四氯苯、五氯苯、六氯苯为０～１０ｕｇ／Ｌ。     

固相微萃取技术及其在有机锡和有机汞分析中的应用

固相微萃取是近年来发展起来的一种简便便快捷的样品前处理技术,这项技术不需要有机萃取剂,是一种环境友好的萃取过程。本文在前人工作和我们自己研究的基础上,讨论了ＳＰＭＥ技术在有机锡和有机汞分析中的应用及各项参数对测定的影响。     

Recent advances in sample preparation techniques in China

Sample preparation is the procedure before instrumental analysis and significant to its effectiveness and efficiency. However, this procedure is usually time‐consuming, labor intensive, and prone to error. In the last decade, the development of sample preparation techniques has received increasing attention, especially in complex sample application. To pretreat samples faster and more effectively, advanced materials, instrumentation, and methods have been combined with typical techniques, including extraction, membrane separation, and chemical conversion techniques. Researchers in China focused on the development of simple, efficient sample preparation methods with selective enrichment and rapid separation capabilities for target analysis in complicated sample matrix and contribute almost a half of the publications in this specific field. In this review, a panorama of sample preparation techniques in China has been composed from more than 140 references, and we highlight some promising methods developed during recent years and introduce different separation materials with respect to these methods.     

选择性固相微萃取涂层的研究进展

固相微萃取装置的核心部分是它的涂层,涂层的种类和厚度是影响分析灵敏度和选择性的最重要因素。具选择性的涂层可增强固相微萃取的分离能力,扩展它的应用范围。本文介绍了固相微萃取的类型,综述了近年来选择性固相微萃取涂层的研究进展,包括溶胶-凝胶涂层、限进介质涂层、分子印迹涂层等涂层的研制及应用。     

Solid-Phase Microextraction of Aliphatic Alcohols Based on Polyaniline Coated Fibers

The efficiency of polyaniline (PANI), coated gold wire was investigated for use as a fiber for solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Aniline monomers were electropolymerized on gold wires by applying a constant current to an acetate buffer containing NaClO₄ as supporting electrolyte for 30 min. These fibers were used for the extraction of some aliphatic alcohols from gaseous samples. The results obtained proved the ability of PANI fiber for sampling organic compounds from gaseous samples. From this work, optimum conditions for preparation and conditioning of fibers and for the extraction of analytes from gaseous samples were obtained. Under optimum conditions, one fiber was used for several equivalent analyses and the relative standard deviations (RSD) were <7% (n=6). However, fiber to fiber reproducibility was <9% (n=6). This fiber is firm and durable and is simply prepared. Calibration graphs were linear in the range: 0.1–10 g mL^–1 for aliphatic alcohols; the detection limit range was 15–75 ng mL^–1 (S/N=3) using a flame ionization detector.