Validation of analytical methods involved in dissolution assays: Acceptance limits and decision methodologies

Dissolution tests are key elements to ensure continuing product quality and performance. The ultimate goal of these tests is to assure consistent product quality within a defined set of specification criteria. Validation of an analytical method aimed at assessing the dissolution profile of products or at verifying pharmacopoeias compliance should demonstrate that this analytical method is able to correctly declare two dissolution profiles as similar or drug products as compliant with respect to their specifications. It is essential to ensure that these analytical methods are fit for their purpose. Method validation is aimed at providing this guarantee. However, even in the ICHQ2 guideline there is no information explaining how to decide whether the method under validation is valid for its final purpose or not. Are the entire validation criterion needed to ensure that a Quality Control (QC) analytical method for dissolution test is valid? What acceptance limits should be set on these criteria? How to decide about method's validity? These are the questions that this work aims at answering. Focus is made to comply with the current implementation of the Quality by Design (QbD) principles in the pharmaceutical industry in order to allow to correctly defining the Analytical Target Profile (ATP) of analytical methods involved in dissolution tests. Analytical method validation is then the natural demonstration that the developed methods are fit for their intended purpose and is not any more the inconsiderate checklist validation approach still generally performed to complete the filing required to obtain product marketing authorization.     

Practical aspects concerning validation and quality control for forensic and clinical bioanalytical quantitative methods

Reporting reliable analytical data is the backbone of forensic and clinical bioanalytical research and applications. Therefore, international agreement concerning validation and quality control requirements is needed. Several international guidelines provide a standard for fundamental validation parameters such as selectivity, matrix effects, method limits, calibration, accuracy, precision and stability. However, it is not always easy for the analyst to ‘translate’ these guidelines into practice. International guidelines remain nonbinding protocols that need to be updated according to the type of application and the analyst’s method requirements and depends on the evolution of analytical techniques. In this publication, suggestions for experimental set-up, statistical approaches and straightforward acceptance criteria for validation of forensic bioanalytical applications are suggested. Furthermore, permanent quality control, to ensure state-of-the-art quantitative analytical performances, as well as measurement uncertainty influencing interpretation is discussed.     

Bioanalytical procedures for determination of drugs of abuse in oral fluid

Recent advances in analytical techniques have enabled the detection of drugs and drug metabolites in oral fluid specimens. Although GC–MS is still commonly used in practice, many laboratories have developed and successfully validated methods for LC–MS(–MS) that can detect a large number of compounds in the limited sample volume available. In addition, several enzyme immunoassays have been commercialized for the detection of drugs of abuse in oral fluid samples, enabling the fast screening and selection of presumably positive samples. A number of concerns are discussed, such as the variability in the volume of sample collected and its implications in terms of quantitative measurements, and the drug recoveries of the many different specimen collection systems on the market. Additional considerations that also receive attention are the importance of providing complete validation data with respect to analyte stability, matrix effect, and the choice of collection method.     

Method validation of modern analytical techniques

 Validation of analytical methods of well-characterised systems, such as are found in the pharmaceutical industry, is based on a series of experimental procedures to establish: selectivity, sensitivity, repeatability, reproducibility, linearity of calibration, detection limit and limit of determination, and robustness. It is argued that these headings become more difficult to apply as the complexity of the analysis increases. Analysis of environmental samples is given as an example. Modern methods of analysis that use arrays of sensors challenge validation. The output may be a classification rather than a concentration of analyte, it may have been established by imprecise methods such as the responses of human taste panels, and the state space of possible responses is too large to cover in any experimental-design procedure. Moreover the process of data analysis may be done by non-linear methods such as neural networks. Validation of systems that rely on computer software is well established. The combination of software validation with validation of the analytical responses of the hardware is the challenge for the analytical chemist. As with validation of automated equipment such as programmable logic controllers in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, method developers may need to concentrate on the process of validation, as well as the minutiae of what is done.     

Benefits arising from proficiency testing schemes: The comparison of analytical methods

 The primary objective of proficiency testing (PT) is in the provision of information and support to participating laboratories, to enable them to monitor and improve the quality of their measurements. However, other benefits can be obtained from PT. These include the comparison of data for a given measurement by different methods, the validation of new methods, and the provision of information for laboratories' customers and accreditation bodies. This paper considers the subject of method comparison, and highlights some of the approaches which can be followed, as well as the practical use to which this can be put, to benefit the analytical community more widely. This is illustrated by a case study concerning the measurement of haze in beer. In this study the United Kingdom Institute of Brewing (IoB) conducted a survey of participants in the Brewing Analytes Proficiency Scheme (BAPS). From the survey data taken together with data from the BAPS scheme, the IoB is now in a position to give guidance on the use of particular instruments and procedures, as well as consider changes to the scope of the BAPS scheme to provide greater benefits for participants concerned with measuring haze. Received: 3 March 1998 · Accepted: 9 June 1998     

Quality assurance in analytical measurement

 The peculiarities of analytical measurement require to check characteristics of the error (its components) of the obtained analysis results to assure the quality of the measurements. This article deals with the various quality assurance procedures and algorithms which are used to check the quality indices, i.e. the accuracy, reproducibility, certainty and repeatability of analytical measurements: These procedures include: laboratory rapid control; Intra-laboratory statistical control (statistical selection control by alternative attribute, statistical selection control by quantity method of periodic check of the analysis procedure for conformity to the specified requirements) and external control (inter-laboratory control checks, inter-laboratory comparison tests, and intra-laboratory control algorithms carried out by the appropriate supervisory body.) in the separately taken laboratory. The respective algorithms, control plans and control requirements, specified according to the different control aims and assurance tasks, enable the quality and certianty of analytical information obtained in laboratories in Russia to be assured. Received: 9 November 1998 / Accepted: 24 November 1998     

Validation of an analytical method to determine trace metal impurities in fluoride compounds by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy

 The development of an analytical method for the determination of some heavy metals (Fe, Cu, Co, Zn and Ni) in fluoride compounds [Cu(BF₄)₂, Sn(BF₄)₂, Pb(BF₄)₂ and HBF₄] by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy is described. This method is to be used as a routine analytical method in an industrial quality control laboratory. To this end the "performance characteristics" of an instrumental analytical method such as matrix effects, sensitivity, linearity, detection and quantitation limits, precision and accuracy were evaluated for every system under study. The results of these investigations showed that non-spectral interferences (due to the presence of large concentrations of major metals such as Cu, Sn and Pb) were observed. Nevertheless it was possible to define a matrix concentration interval where matrix effects were not statistically significant, and therefore a direct calibration approach could be used as the calibration tool whenever the major metal concentration was not higher than 40×10^–3 kg l^–1. A guide to the developement of an analytical method for trace metal determination is provided. General tools for quality control have been used in order to show how an analytical method can be tested daily and evaluated in a convenient manner. Received: 29 January 1997 Accepted: 11 March 1997     

Validation requirements for chemical methods in quantitative analysis – horses for courses?

 Although the validation process necessary to ensure that an analytical method is fit for purpose is universal, the emphasis placed on different aspects of that process will vary according to the end use for which the analytical procedure is designed. It therefore becomes difficult to produce a standard method validation protocol which will be totally applicable to all analytical methods. It is probable that far more than 30% of the methods in routine laboratory use have not been validated to an appropriate level to suit the problem at hand. This situation needs to change and a practical assessment of the degree to which a method requires to be validated is the first step to a reliable and cost effective analytical industry. Received: 22 September 1997 · Accepted: 28 November 1997     

Extraction and determination by liquid chromatography and spectrophotometry of naloxone in microparticles for drug-addiction treatment

This paper discusses the development and validation of two analytical methods for the assay of naloxone in microparticles, as used in the therapy of opioid drug addiction (weaning). A UV-Vis spectrophotometric method is proposed to study drug loading and drug release, due to its ease and simplicity of performance, while a high performance liquid chromatographic method is developed as a means of stability-indication. Both analytical procedures were validated according to the International Committee for Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. Although the ranges and wavelengths were different for the two analytical methods, they were both found to be specific, linear, precise, and accurate under the determined conditions.     

A mussel tissue certified reference material for multiple phycotoxins. Part 2: liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, sample extraction and quantitation procedures

A freeze-dried mussel tissue certified reference material (CRM-FDMT1) containing multiple groups of shellfish toxins has been prepared. Toxin groups present in the material include okadaic acid and the dinophysistoxins, azaspiracids, yessotoxins, pectenotoxins, spirolides and domoic acid. In this work, analytical methods have been examined for the characterisation of the candidate CRM. A comprehensive extraction procedure was developed, which gave good recovery (>98%) for all lipophilic toxins studied. A fast liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method was developed that separates the major toxins according to the MS ionisation mode of optimum sensitivity. Matrix effects associated with analysis of these extracts using the developed LC-MS method were assessed. Standard addition and matrix-matched calibration procedures were evaluated to compensate for matrix effects. The methods and approaches will be used for the precise characterisation of the homogeneity and stability of the various toxins in CRM-FDMT1 and for the accurate assignment of certified values. The developed methods also have excellent potential for application in routine regulatory monitoring of shellfish toxins.     

Development of a simultaneous liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of type B trichothecenes, their derivatives, and precursors in wheat

A method coupling liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous quantitative determination of trichothecenes, nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, deoxynivalenol‐3‐glucoside, fusarenon‐X, 3‐acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15‐acetyldeoxynivalenol, isotrichodermin, calonectrin, 3‐deacetylcalonectrin, 15‐deacetylcalonectrin, 3,15‐diacetylnivalenol, 4,15‐diacetylnivalenol, 3,15‐diacetyldeoxynivalenol, and 3,4,15‐triacetylnivalenol. The analytical parameters of trichothecenes and their derivatives were optimized to enable their highly sensitive detection. Evaluation of clean‐up procedures using Multisep #226 and #227 indicated that Multisep #227 was more suitable for their simultaneous detection in wheat. In performance validation studies using the LC/MS/MS method with Multisep #227 cleanup, good recoveries ranging from 84% to 115% with relative standard deviations from 0.4% to 7.2% were measured. The limits of detection and quantification ranged from 0.03 to 1.4 ng·g^?1 and from 0.1 to 4.7 ng·g^?1, respectively. The effect of matrices using matrix‐matched calibration was estimated to range from 80% to 117% after Multisep #227 cleanup. Multisep #227 clean‐up procedure with matrix‐free standard calibration achieved accurate quantification without having a considerable effect on matrix compounds. Using the developed method, several trichothecene derivatives and precursors were detected in fungally inoculated wheat samples. The developed LC/MS/MS method is a practical technique that can be used for the quantification of trichothecenes in wheat. This study is the first report of an analytical method used for the simultaneous quantification of major trichothecenes, their derivatives and precursors. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Qualification and validation of software and computer systems in laboratories

 Existing software and computer systems in laboratories require retrospective evaluation and validation if their initial validation was not formally documented. The key steps in this process are similar to those for the validation of new software and systems: user requirements and system specification, formal qualification, and procedures to ensure ongoing performance during routine operation. The main difference is that frequently qualification of an existing system is based primarily on reliable operation and proof of performance in the past rather than on qualification during development and installation. Received: 30 April 1998 · Accepted: 2 June 1998     

Determination of analytical limits in solid sampling ETAAS: a new approach towards the characterization of analytical quality in rapid methods

In the present study the lower analytical limits of solid sampling electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry (SS-ETAAS) were characterized by means of blank measurements and – for the first time – by means of the calibration curve method, where a calibration near the range of these limits (limit of decision, detection and quantification) was performed. The limit of decision as derived from blank measurements was calculated according to the 3σ-criterion to be 0.003 and 0.019 ng for Cd and Pb, respectively. For Pb and Cd a roughly threefold increase of these limits was observed when the calibration method according to DIN 32 645 was applied. When solid reference material was used, only a slight increase could be observed. The analytical limits were 2 to 20 times lower than reported for sample decomposition methods. The blank measurement and conventional calibration curve method, however, do not account for factors relating to solid sampling such as sample mass and matrix. Therefore, the calibration curve model was applied to data derived from comparisons between direct solid sampling ETAAS and a compound reference method (ETAAS following sample homogenization and digestion). The observed analytical limits were not found to be substantially increased if enough samples with low element contents were available for calibration. Coupling of the calibration curve model with the comparison of methods included real test samples and thus the relevant maximum sample mass and analyte content in the range of the lower analytical limits. As validation procedures frequently include comparisons of methods, the present approach might prove to be of some general interest for the characterization of analytical quality in rapid methods.     

Determination of analytical limits in solid sampling ETAAS: a new approach towards the characterization of analytical quality in rapid methods

In the present study the lower analytical limits of solid sampling electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry (SS-ETAAS) were characterized by means of blank measurements and--for the first time--by means of the calibration curve method, where a calibration near the range of these limits (limit of decision, detection and quantification) was performed. The limit of decision as derived from blank measurements was calculated according to the 3sigma-criterion to be 0.003 and 0.019 ng for Cd and Pb, respectively. For Pb and Cd a roughly three-fold increase of these limits was observed when the calibration method according to DIN 32 645 was applied. When solid reference material was used, only a slight increase could be observed. The analytical limits were 2 to 20 times lower than reported for sample decomposition methods. The blank measurement and conventional calibration curve method, however, do not account for factors relating to solid sampling such as sample mass and matrix. Therefore, the calibration curve model was applied to data derived from comparisons between direct solid sampling ETAAS and a compound reference method (ETAAS following sample homogenization and digestion). The observed analytical limits were not found to be substantially increased if enough samples with low element contents were available for calibration. Coupling of the calibration curve model with the comparison of methods included real test samples and thus the relevant maximum sample mass and analyte content in the range of the lower analytical limits. As validation procedures frequently include comparisons of methods, the present approach might prove to be of some general interest for the characterization of analytical quality in rapid methods.     

Quality assurance in the view of a commercial analytical laboratory

 The necessity for analytical quality assurance is primarily a feature of the analytical process itself. With the full establishment of the EU domestic market, it is also becoming a legal necessity for an increasing number of analytical laboratories. The requirements which laboratories will need to fulfil are stipulated in DIN EN 45 001. Accredited testing laboratories must in fact provide evidence that they work solely in accordance with this standard. National and EU commissions, which are legislative authorities, tend therefore to specify analytical methods, e.g. in the form of regulations or appendices thereto, intended to ensure that results from different laboratories will be comparable and hence will stand up in a court of law. The analytical quality assurance system (AQS), introduced by the Baden-Württemberg Ministry for the Environment in 1984, obliges laboratories to regularly participate in collaborative studies and thereby demonstrate their ability to provide suitably accurate analyses. This alone, however, does not sufficiently demonstrate the competence of a laboratory. Only personal appraisal of the laboratory by an auditor, together with the successful analysis of a sample provided by the same and performed under his observation, can provide proof of the competence of the laboratory. From an analytical point of view, the competence of a laboratory must be regarded as the decisive factor. Competence can only be attained through analytical quality assurance, which thus must be demanded of all laboratories. Received: 4 October 1996 Accepted: 15 January 1997     

Compliance with GLP standards and management in analytical laboratories: current status

 Analytical laboratories in Japan, operating more often as departments within a company than as independent contractors, have to contend with different good laboratory practice (GLP) standards. Problems also occur in the analytical laboratories which must comply with GLP, good manufacturing practice (GMP) and good clinical practice (GCP) regulations within the same facility. The status of these GLP-complied analytical laboratories is reviewed with regard to assurance program, validation method, laboratory information management, and security systems. The differences in the responsible authorities and scopes under the six GLPs are also briefly described. Analytical tests in GLP are not itemized as a test for accreditation. Therefore, the accreditation of analytical laboratories in Japan is currently granted as a part of ISO 9000 approvals. Received: 27 September 1996 Accepted: 11 November 1996     

A comparative analysis of gold-rich plant material using various analytical methods

During 2003 a field demonstration of gold phytoextraction technology was conducted in Brazil. As there is no commercially available biogeochemical standard reference material with an elevated concentration of gold, the trial biomass was analysed for its gold content using five analytical methods, at five laboratories, to confirm the concentration of gold in the harvested plant material. Nitric and hydrochloric acid digest followed by ICP-OES solution analysis of a doré bead prepared through fire assay of vegetative material was considered the benchmark analytical method to which the other results were compared. The gold concentrations reported by the five laboratories varied widely. Flame atomic absorption analysis of a solution prepared through the digest of plant ash by aqua regia proved the most accurate analytical method relative to fire assay. Gold concentrations reported by a New Zealand commercial laboratory using ICP-MS and a standard ‘biological materials digest’ procedure were affected by the digest method employed. X-ray fluorescence results may have been affected by synthetic standards that were prepared specifically for this investigation. Alternatively, matrix effects may not have been fully corrected for using XRF. Analysis of metal-rich biomass is becoming more common due to the popularity of studies that use plants to absorb heavy metals. The results of our comparative investigation emphasise that due care and consideration must be given to the selection of the analytical method chosen to analyse such plant material. Our results also highlight the need for standard reference materials that are suitably enriched in metals, such that these may be of use to phytoextraction studies.     

A review on analytical performance of micro- and nanoplastics analysis methods

Micro- and nanoplastics have been detected in diverse matrices. Recent studies have suggested their health impact on humans, animals, plants, and environment which depends on the size, concentration, chemical nature, and the mode of interaction of the plastic particles. Detection and quantification of these particles are often challenging due to their small size and complexity of the matrix in which they exist. The concentration and size of the particles combined with the nature of the matrix determines an analytical method to be followed. In recent years, many review articles focusing on origin, fate, and health effects of micro- and nanoplastics are already published. A systemic review focusing on analytical performance of currently available micro- and nanoplastics analysis methods would be useful for the scientific community. In this article, we reviewed papers and reports published in recent decades focusing on the sampling, concentration, detection, and chemical identification methods. We also reviewed the emerging new methods for microplastic analysis. Finally, we provide advantages and limitations of the methods and future perspectives on microplastic analysis.