A Neutral Tetraphosphacyclobutadiene Ligand in Cobalt(I) Complexes

The unusual reactivity of the newly synthesized β‐diketiminato cobalt(I) complexes, [(L^DepCo)₂] ( 2 a , L^Dep=CH[C(Me)N(2,6‐Et₂C₆H₃)]₂) and [L^DippCo ? toluene] ( 2 b , L^Dipp=CH[CHN(2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)]₂), toward white phosphorus was investigated, affording the first cobalt(I) complexes [(L^DepCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)] ( 3 a ) and [(L^DippCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)] ( 3 b ) bearing the neutral cyclo‐P₄ ligand with a rectangular‐planar structure. The redox chemistry of 3 a and 3 b was studied by cyclic voltammetry and their chemical reduction with one molar equivalent of potassium graphite led to the isolation of [(L^DepCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)][K(dme)₄] ( 4 a ) and [(L^DippCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)][K(dme)₄] ( 4 b ). Unexpectedly, the monoanionic Co₂P₄ core in 4 a and 4 b , respectively, contains the two‐electron‐reduced cyclo‐P₄^2? ligand with a square‐planar structure and mixed‐valent cobalt(I,II) sites. The electronic structures of 3 a , 3 b , 4 a , and 4 b were elucidated by NMR and EPR spectroscopy as well as magnetic measurements and are in agreement with results of broken‐symmetry DFT calculations.     

Conversion of E4 (E4=P4, As4, AsP3) by Ni(0) and Ni(I) Synthons – A Comparative Study

The reactivity of white phosphorus and yellow arsenic towards two different nickel nacnac complexes is investigated. The nickel complexes [(L¹Ni)₂tol] ( 1 , L¹=[{N(C₆H₃ⁱPr₂-2,6)C(Me)}₂CH]⁻) and [K₂][(L¹Ni)₂(μ,η^{1 : 1}-N₂)] ( 6 ) were reacted with P₄, As₄ and the interpnictogen compound AsP₃, respectively, yielding the homobimetallic complexes [(L¹Ni)₂(μ-η²,κ¹:η²,κ¹-E₄)] (E=P ( 2 a ), As ( 2 b ), AsP₃ ( 2 c )), [(L¹Ni)₂(μ,η^{3 : 3}-E₃)] (E=P ( 3 a ), As ( 3 b )) and [K@18-c-6(thf)₂][L¹Ni(η^{1 : 1}-E₄)] (E=P ( 7 a ), As ( 7 b )), respectively. Heating of 2 a , 2 b or 2 c also leads to the formation of 3 a or 3 b . Furthermore, the reactivity of these compounds towards reduction agents was investigated, leading to [K₂][(L¹Ni)₂(μ,η^{2 : 2}-P₄)] ( 4 ) and [K@18-c-6(thf)₃][(L¹Ni)₂(μ,η^{3 : 3}-E₃)] (E=P ( 5 a ), As ( 5 b )), respectively. Compound 4 shows an unusual planarization of the initial Ni₂P₄-prism. All products were comprehensively characterized by crystallographic and spectroscopic methods.     

Synthesis and Reactivity of an End‐Deck cyclo‐P4 Iron Complex

Reduction of the Fe^II complex [(^PhPP₂^Cy)FeCl₂] ( 2 ) generated an electron‐rich and unsaturated Fe⁰ species, which was reacted with white phosphorus. The resulting new complex, [(^PhPP₂^Cy)Fe(η⁴‐P₄)] ( 3 ), is the first iron cyclo‐P₄ complex and the only known stable end‐deck cyclo‐P₄ complex outside Group V. Complex 3 features an Fe^II center, as shown by Mössbauer spectroscopy, associated to a P₄^2? fragment. The distinct reactivity of complex 3 was rationalized by analysis of the molecular orbitals. Reaction of complex 3 with H⁺ afforded the unstable complex [(^PhPP₂^Cy)Fe(η⁴‐P₄)(H)]⁺ ( 4 ), whereas with CuCl and BCF, the complexes [(^PhPP₂^Cy)Fe(η⁴:η¹‐P₄)(μ‐CuCl)]₂ ( 5 ) and [(^PhPP₂^Cy)Fe(η⁴:η¹‐P₄)B(C₆F₅)₃] ( 6 ) were formed.     

Element–Element Bond Formation upon Oxidation and Reduction

The redox chemistry of [(Cp′′′Co)₂(μ,η²:η²‐E₂)₂] (E=P ( 1 ), As ( 2 ); Cp′′′=1,2,4‐tri(tert‐butyl)cyclopentadienyl) was investigated. Both compounds can be oxidized and reduced twice. That way, the monocations [(Cp′′′Co)₂(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐E₄)][X] (E=P, X=BF₄ ( 3 a ), [FAl] ( 3 b ); E=As, X=BF₄ ( 4 a ), [FAl] ( 4 b )), the dications [(Cp′′′Co)₂(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐E₄)][TEF]₂ (E=P ( 5 ), As ( 6 )), and the monoanions [K(18‐c‐6)(dme)₂][(Cp′′′Co)₂(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐E₄)] (E=P ( 7 ), As ( 8 )) were isolated. Further reduction of 7 leads to the dianionic complex [K(18‐c‐6)(dme)₂][K(18‐c‐6)][(Cp′′′Co)₂(μ,η³:η³‐P₄)] ( 9 ), in which the cyclo‐P₄ ligand has rearranged to a chain‐like P₄ ligand. Further reduction of 8 can be achieved with an excess of potassium under the formation of [K(dme)₄][(Cp′′′Co)₂(μ,η³:η³‐As₃)] ( 10 ) and the elimination of an As₁ unit. Compound 10 represents the first example of an allylic As₃ ligand incorporated into a triple‐decker complex.     

Ring Contraction by NHC‐Induced Pnictogen Abstraction

The reaction of [Cp′′′Co(η⁴‐P₄)] ( 1 ) (Cp′′′=1,2,4‐tBu₃C₅H₂) with ^MeNHC (^MeNHC=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) leads through NHC‐induced phosphorus cation abstraction to the ring contraction product [(^MeNHC)₂P][Cp′′′Co(η³‐P₃)] ( 2 ), which represents the first example of an anionic CoP₃ complex. Such NHC‐induced ring contraction reactions are also applicable for triple‐decker sandwich complexes. The complexes [(Cp*Mo)₂(μ,η^6:6‐E₆)] ( 3 a , 3 b ) (Cp*=C₅Me₅; E=P, As) can be transformed to the complexes [(^MeNHC)₂E][(Cp*M)₂(μ,η^3:3‐E₃)(μ,η^2:2‐E₂)] ( 4 a , 4 b ), with 4 b representing the first structurally characterized example of an NHC‐substituted As^I cation. Further, the reaction of the vanadium complex [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 5 ) with ^MeNHC results in the formation of the unprecedented complexes [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 6 ), [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^5:5‐P₅)] ( 7 ) and [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^3:3‐P₃)(μ,η^1:1‐P{^MeNHC})] ( 8 ).     

Ringkontraktion durch NHC‐induzierte Pnictogen‐Abstraktion

Die Reaktion von [Cp′′′Co(η⁴‐P₄)] ( 1 ) (Cp′′′=1,2,4‐tBu₃C₅H₂) mit ^MeNHC (^MeNHC=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) führt über eine NHC‐induzierte Phosphorkationen‐Abstraktion zum Ringkontraktionsprodukt [(^MeNHC)₂P][Cp′′′Co(η³‐P₃)] ( 2 ), welches das erste Beispiel eines anionischen CoP₃‐Komplexes repräsentiert. Solche von NHCs induzierten Ringkontraktionsreaktionen lassen sich ebenfalls auf Tripeldecker‐Sandwich‐Komplexe anwenden. So werden die Komplexe [(Cp*Mo)₂(μ,η^6:6‐E₆)] ( 3 a , 3 b ) (Cp*=C₅Me₅; E=P, As) zu den Komplexen [(^MeNHC)₂E][(Cp*M)₂(μ,η^3:3‐E₃)(μ,η^2:2‐E₂)] ( 4 a , 4 b ) transformiert, wobei 4 b das erste strukturell charakterisierte Beispiel eines NHC‐substituierten As^I‐Kations darstellt. Darüber hinaus führt die Reaktion des Vanadium‐Komplexes [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 5 ) mit ^MeNHC zur Bildung der neuartigen Komplexe [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 6 ), [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^5:5‐P₅)] ( 7 ) bzw. [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^3:3‐P₃)(μ,η^1:1‐P{^MeNHC})] ( 8 ).     

Molecular Polyarsenides of the Rare‐Earth Elements

Reduction of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] with [Cp′′₂Sm(thf)] (Cp′′=η⁵‐1,3‐(tBu)₂C₅H₃) under various conditions led to [(Cp′′₂Sm)(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐As₄)(Cp*Fe)] and [(Cp′′₂Sm)₂As₇(Cp*Fe)]. Both compounds are the first polyarsenides of the rare‐earth metals. [(Cp′′₂Sm)(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐As₄)(Cp*Fe)] is also the first d/f‐triple decker sandwich complex with a purely inorganic planar middle deck. The central As₄^2? unit is isolobal with the 6π‐aromatic cyclobutadiene dianion (CH)₄^2?. [(Cp′′₂Sm)₂As₇(Cp*Fe)] contains an As₇^3? cage, which has a norbornadiene‐like structure with two short As?As bonds in the scaffold. DFT calculations confirm all the structural observations. The As?As bond order inside the cyclo As₄ ligand in [(Cp′′₂Sm)(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐As₄)(Cp*Fe)] was estimated to be in between an As?As single bond and a formally aromatic As₄^2? system.     

Synthese und Struktur von η1‐Phosphaallyl‐, η1‐Arsaallylund η1‐Stibaallyleisen‐Komplexen [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2Fe–E(SiMe3)C(OSiMe3)=CPh2] (E = P,As, Sb)

Syntheses and Structures of η¹‐Phosphaallyl, η¹‐Arsaallyl, and η¹‐Stibaallyl Iron Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] (E = P, As, Sb) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a : E = P; 1 b : As; 1 c : Sb) and diphenylketene afforded the η¹‐phosphaallyl‐, η¹‐arsaallyl‐, and η¹‐stibaallyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] ( 2 a : E = P; 2 b : As; 2 c : Sb). The molecular structures of 2 b and 2 c were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Methylidene Rare‐Earth‐Metal Complex Mediated Transformations of CN,NN and N?H Bonds: New Routes to Imido Rare‐Earth‐Metal Clusters

Three new patterns of reactivity of rare‐earth metal methylidene complexes have been established and thus have resulted in access to a wide variety of imido rare‐earth metal complexes [L₃Ln₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐Me)(μ ‐ NR)] (L=[PhC(NC₆H₃iPr₂‐2,6)₂]^?; R=Ph, Ln=Y ( 2 a ), Lu ( 2 b ); R=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, Ln=Y ( 3 a ), Lu ( 3 b ); R=p‐ClC₆H₄, Ln=Y ( 4 a ), Lu ( 4 b ); R=p‐MeOC₆H₄, Ln=Y ( 5 a ), Lu ( 5 b ); R=Me₂CHCH₂CH₂, Ln=Y ( 6 a ), Lu ( 6 b )) and [{L₃Lu₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐Me)}₂(μ ‐ NR′N)] (R′=(CH₂)₆ ( 7 b ), (C₆H₄)₂ ( 8 b )). Complex 2 b was treated with an excess of CO₂ to give the corresponding carboxylate complex [L₃Lu₃(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂CCH₃)₃(μ‐η¹:η²‐O₂C‐CH₃)(μ‐η¹:η¹:η²‐O₂CNPh)] ( 9 b ) easily. Complex 2 a could undergo the selective μ₃‐Me abstraction reaction with phenyl acetylene to give the mixed imido/alkynide complex [L₃Y₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐η¹:η¹:η³‐NPh)(μ₃‐C?CPh)] ( 10 a ) in high yield. Treatment of 2 with one equivalent of thiophenol gave the selective μ₃‐methyl‐abstracted products [L₃Ln₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐η¹:η¹:η³‐NPh)(μ₃‐SPh)] (Ln=Y ( 11 a ); Lu ( 11 b ). All new complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, NMR spectroscopy, and most of the structures confirmed by X‐ray diffraction.     

A General Pathway to Heterobimetallic Triple-Decker Complexes

A systematic study on the reactivity of the triple-decker complex [(Cp’’’Co)₂(μ,η⁴:η⁴-C₇H₈)] ( A ) (Cp’’’=1,2,4-tritertbutyl-cyclopentadienyl) towards sandwich complexes containing cyclo-P₃, cyclo-P₄, and cyclo-P₅ ligands under mild conditions is presented. The heterobimetallic triple-decker sandwich complexes [(Cp*Fe)(Cp’’’Co)(μ,η⁵:η⁴-P₅)] ( 1 ) and [(Cp’’’Co)(Cp’’’Ni)(μ,η³:η³-P₃)] ( 3 ) (Cp*=1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) were synthesized and fully characterized. In solution, these complexes exhibit a unique fluxional behavior, which was investigated by variable temperature NMR spectroscopy. The dynamic processes can be blocked by coordination to {W(CO)₅} fragments, leading to the complexes [(Cp*Fe)(Cp’’’Co)(μ₃,η⁵:η⁴:η¹-P₅){W(CO)₅}] ( 2 a ), [(Cp*Fe)(Cp’’’Co)(μ₄,η⁵:η⁴:η¹:η¹-P₅){(W(CO)₅)₂}] ( 2 b ), and [(Cp’’’Co)(Cp’’’Ni)(μ₃,η³:η²:η¹-P₃){W(CO)₅}] ( 4 ), respectively. The thermolysis of 3 leads to the tetrahedrane complex [(Cp’’’Ni)₂(μ,η²:η²-P₂)] ( 5 ). All compounds were fully characterized using single-crystal X-ray structure analysis, NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis.     

Mononuclear Complexes of Platinum Group Metals Containing η6‐ and η5‐Cyclic Π‐Perimeter Hydrocarbon and Pyridylpyrazolyl Derivatives: Syntheses and Structural Studies

Piano‐stool‐shaped platinum group metal compounds, stable in the solid state and in solution, which are based on 2‐(5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L ) with the formulas [(η⁶‐arene)Ru( L )Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₆H₆ ( 1 ), p‐cymene ( 2 ), and C₆Me₆, ( 3 )}, [(η⁶‐C₅Me₅)M( L )Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh ( 4 ), Ir ( 5 )}, and [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 6 ), [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 7 ), [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 8 ), and [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 9 ) were prepared by a general method and characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of compounds 4 and 5 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In each compound the metal is connected to N1 and N11 in a k² manner.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of RuII Complexes with Trimethylsilylethinylamidinate Ligands

The mononuclear amidinate complexes [(η⁶‐cymene)‐RuCl( 1a )] ( 2 ) and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)RuCl( 1b )] ( 3 ), with the trimethylsilyl‐ethinylamidinate ligands [Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐c‐C₆H₁₁)₂]^– ( 1a^– ) and[Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂]^– ( 1b^– ) were synthesized in high yields by salt metathesis. In addition, the related phosphane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4a ) [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4b ), and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )](BF₄) ( 5 ‐BF₄) were prepared by ligand exchange reactions. Investigations on the removal of the trimethyl‐silyl group using [Bu₄N]F resulted in the isolation of [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃){(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂CC≡CH}](BF₄) ( 6 ‐BF₄) bearing a terminal alkynyl hydrogen atom, while 2 and 3 revealed to yield intricate reaction mixtures. Compounds 1a / b to 6 ‐BF₄ were characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P) and IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses, including X‐ray diffraction analysis of 1b , 2 , and 3 .     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)3L(μ‐η1 : η2‐C≡CPh)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (L = CO,PnBu3)

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (L = CO, PⁿBu₃) [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) reacts with several phosphines (L) in refluxing toluene under substitution of one carbonyl ligand and yields the compounds [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] (L = PⁿBu₃, 2 a ; L = PCy₂H, 2 b ; L = dppm‐P, 2 c ; dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). The reactivity of 1 as well as the activated complexes 2 a – c towards phenylethyne was studied. Thus 1 , 2 a and 2 b , respectively, react with PhC≡CH in refluxing toluene with elimination of dihydrogen to the acetylide‐bridged complexes [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) and [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 a and 4 b ). The molecular structures of 3 and 4 a were determined by crystal structure analyses.     

The Influence of β‐diiminato Ligands on As4 Activation by Cobalt Complexes

In a systematic study of the activation of As₄, three [LCo(tol)] (L=β‐diiminato) complexes have revealed different steric and electronic influences. 2,6‐Diisopropylphenyl (Dipp) and 2,6‐dimethylphenyl (dmp) flanking groups were used, one of the ligands with H backbone substituents (β‐dialdiminate L⁰) and two with Me substituents (β‐diketiminates L³ and L¹). In the reaction with As₄, different dinuclear products [(LCo)₂As₄] (LM=L⁰ ( 1 ), L¹ ( 2 ), L³ ( 3 )) were isolated, with all showing differently shaped [Co₂As₄] cores in the solid state: octahedral in 1 , prismatic in 2 , and asterane‐like in 3 . Thermal treatment of 3 leads to the abstraction of one arsenic atom to yield [(L³Co)₂As₃] ( 4 ). All products were comprehensively characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, FD‐MS, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. A rational explanation for the different reactivity is also proposed and DFT calculations shed light on the nature of the highly flexible [Co₂As₄] cores.     

Iron Borohydride Pincer Complexes for the Efficient Hydrogenation of Ketones under Mild,Base‐Free Conditions: Synthesis and Mechanistic Insight

The new, structurally characterized hydrido carbonyl tetrahydridoborate iron pincer complex [(iPr‐PNP)Fe(H)(CO)(η¹‐BH₄)] ( 1 ) catalyzes the base‐free hydrogenation of ketones to their corresponding alcohols employing only 4.1 atm hydrogen pressure. Turnover numbers up to 1980 at complete conversion of ketone were reached with this system. Treatment of 1 with aniline (as a BH₃ scavenger) resulted in a mixture of trans‐[(iPr‐PNP)Fe(H)₂(CO)] ( 4 a ) and cis‐[(iPr‐PNP)Fe(H)₂(CO)] ( 4 b ). The dihydrido complexes 4 a and 4 b do not react with acetophenone or benzaldehyde, indicating that these complexes are not intermediates in the catalytic reduction of ketones. NMR studies indicate that the tetrahydridoborate ligand in 1 dissociates prior to ketone reduction. DFT calculations show that the mechanism of the iron‐catalyzed hydrogenation of ketones involves alcohol‐assisted aromatization of the dearomatized complex [(iPr‐PNP*)Fe(H)(CO)] ( 7 ) to initially give the Fe⁰ complex [(iPr‐PNP)Fe(CO)] ( 21 ) and subsequently [(iPr‐PNP)Fe(CO)(EtOH)] ( 38 ). Concerted coordination of acetophenone and dual hydrogen‐atom transfer from the PNP arm and the coordinated ethanol to, respectively, the carbonyl carbon and oxygen atoms, leads to the dearomatized complex [(iPr‐PNP*)Fe(CO)(EtO)(MeCH(OH)Ph)] ( 32 ). The catalyst is regenerated by release of 1‐phenylethanol, followed by dihydrogen coordination and proton transfer to the coordinated ethoxide ligand.     

Fixation and Release of Intact E4 Tetrahedra (E=P,As)

By the reaction of [NacnacCuCH₃CN] with white phosphorus (P₄) and yellow arsenic (As₄), the stabilization and enclosure of the intact E₄ tetrahedra are realized and the disubstituted complexes [(NacnacCu)₂(μ,η^2:2‐E₄)] ( 1 a : E=P, 1 b : E=As) are formed. The mono‐substituted complex [NacnacCu(η²‐P₄)] ( 2 ), was detected by the exchange reaction of 1 a with P₄ and was only isolated using low‐temperature work‐up. All products were comprehensively spectroscopically and crystallographically characterized. The bonding situation in the products as intact E₄ units (E=P, As) was confirmed by theory and was experimentally proven by the pyridine promoted release of the bridging E₄ tetrahedra in 1 .     

Mono‐ and Dinuclear Heteroleptic Cobalt Complexes with α‐Diimine and Polyarene Ligands

Reactions of the dimeric cobalt complex [(L^?Co)₂] ( 1 , L=[(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(Me)]₂) with polyarenes afforded a series of mononuclear and dinuclear complexes: [LCo(η⁴‐anthracene)] ( 2 ), [LCo(μ‐η⁴:η⁴‐naphthalene)CoL] ( 3 ), and [LCo(μ‐η⁴:η⁴‐phenanthrene)CoL] ( 4 ). The pyrene complexes [{Na₂(Et₂O)₂}{LCo(μ‐η³:η³‐pyrene)CoL}] ( 5 ) and [{Na₂(Et₂O)₃}{LCo(η³‐pyrene)}] ( 6 ) were obtained by treating precursor 1 with pyrene followed by reduction with Na metal. These complexes contain three potential redox active centers: the cobalt metal and both α‐diimine and polyarene ligands. Through a combination of X‐ray crystallography, EPR spectroscopy, magnetic susceptibility measurement, and DFT computations, the electronic configurations of these complexes were studied. It was determined that complexes 2 – 4 have a high‐spin Co^I center coupled with a radical α‐diimine ligand and a neutral polyarene ligand. Whereas, the ligand L in complexes 5 and 6 has been further reduced to the dianion, the cobalt remains in a formal (I) oxidation state, and the pyrene molecule is either neutral or monoanionic.     

Iodination of cyclo‐E5‐Complexes (E=P,As)

In a high‐yield one‐pot synthesis, the reactions of [Cp*M(η⁵‐P₅)] (M=Fe ( 1 ), Ru ( 2 )) with I₂ resulted in the selective formation of [Cp*MP₆I₆]⁺ salts ( 3 , 4 ). The products comprise unprecedented all‐cis tripodal triphosphino‐cyclotriphosphine ligands. The iodination of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 6 ) gave, in addition to [Fe(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ salts of the rare [As₆I₈]^2? (in 7 ) and [As₄I₁₄]^2? (in 8 ) anions, the first di‐cationic Fe‐As triple decker complex [(Cp*Fe)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈] ( 9 ). In contrast, the iodination of [Cp*Ru(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 10 ) did not result in the full cleavage of the M?As bonds. Instead, a number of dinuclear complexes were obtained: [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈]_0.5 ( 11 ) represents the first Ru‐As₅ triple decker complex, thus completing the series of monocationic complexes [(Cp^RM)₂(μ,η^5:5‐E₅)]⁺ (M=Fe, Ru; E=P, As). [(Cp*Ru)₂As₈I₆] ( 12 ) crystallizes as a racemic mixture of both enantiomers, while [(Cp*Ru)₂As₄I₄] ( 13 ) crystallizes as a symmetric and an asymmetric isomer and features a unique tetramer of {AsI} arsinidene units as a middle deck.     

Direct Evidence for a [4+2] Cycloaddition Mechanism of Alkynes to Tantallacyclopentadiene on Dinuclear Tantalum Complexes as a Model of Alkyne Cyclotrimerization

A dinuclear tantalum complex, [Ta₂Cl₆(μ‐C₄Et₄)] ( 2 ), bearing a tantallacyclopentadiene moiety, was synthesized by treating [(η²‐EtC?CEt)TaCl₃(DME)] ( 1 ) with AlCl₃. Complex 2 and its Lewis base adducts, [Ta₂Cl₆(μ‐C₄Et₄)L] (L=THF ( 3 a ), pyridine ( 3 b ), THT ( 3 c )), served as more active catalysts for cyclotrimerization of internal alkynes than 1 . During the reaction of 3 a with 3‐hexyne, we isolated [Ta₂Cl₄(μ‐η⁴:η⁴‐C₆Et₆)(μ‐η²:η²‐EtC?CEt)] ( 4 ), sandwiched by a two‐electron reduced μ‐η⁴:η⁴‐hexaethylbenzene and a μ‐η²:η²‐3‐hexyne ligand, as a product of an intermolecular cyclization between the metallacyclopentadiene moiety and 3‐hexyne. The formation of arene complexes [Ta₂Cl₄(μ‐η⁴:η⁴‐C₆Et₄Me₂)(μ‐η²:η²‐Me₃SiC?CSiMe₃)] ( 7 b ) and [Ta₂Cl₄(μ‐η⁴:η⁴‐C₆Et₄RH)(μ‐η²:η²‐Me₃SiC?CSiMe₃)] (R=nBu ( 8 a ), p‐tolyl ( 8 b )) by treating [Ta₂Cl₄(μ‐C₄Et₄)(μ‐η²:η²‐Me₃SiC?CSiMe₃)] ( 6 ) with 2‐butyne, 1‐hexyne, and p‐tolylacetylene without any isomers, at room temperature or low temperature were key for clarifying the [4+2] cycloaddition mechanism because of the restricted rotation behavior of the two‐electron reduced arene ligands without dissociation from the dinuclear tantalum center.