Deterministic version of Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of matrix eigenvalues

It is proved that Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of eigenvalues of random matrices, which is important in the statistical theory of energy levels of heavy nuclei, possesses the following completely deterministic version. Let A_n=(a_ij), 1?i, ?n, be the nth section of an infinite Hermitian matrix, {λ⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n its eigenvalues, and {u_k⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n the corresponding (orthonormalized column) eigenvectors. Let $\text{v}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=(a}{}_{\mathrm{n1}}\text{,a}{}_{\mathrm{n2}}\text{,?,a}{}_{\mathrm{n,n?1}}\text{)}$, put

$\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)=[n(n-1)]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>-1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{[(n-1)t]}\text{|v}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{f}}{}^{\mathrm{(n-1)}}\text{|}{}^2\text{,}\text{0?t?1}$

(bookeeping function for the length of the projections of the new row v¹_n of A_n onto the eigenvectors of the preceding matrix A_n?1), and let finally

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=n}{}^{-1}\text{(}\text{number of}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{?x}\text{n}\text{,1?k?n)}$

(empirical distribution function of the eigenvalues of $\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{n}$. Suppose (i) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{nn}}\text{n}\text{=0}$, (ii) lim_nX_n(t)=Ct(0<C<∞,0?t?1). Then

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?W(·,C)}\text{(n→∞)}$

,where W is absolutely continuous with (semicircle) density

$\text{w(x,C)=}\text{(2Cπ)}{}^{-1}\text{(4C-x}{}^2{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}\text{0}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}$

     

Uniqueness of solutions of nonlinear Dirichlet problems

In this paper, we consider the uniqueness of radial solutions of the nonlinear Dirichlet problem $\text{Δu + ?(u) = 0}\text{in}\text{Ω}\text{with}\text{u = 0}\text{on}\text{?Ω,}\text{where}\text{Δ = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{,?}$ satisfies some appropriate conditions and Ω is a bounded smooth domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ which possesses radial symmetry. Our uniqueness results apply to, for instance, $\text{?(u) = u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{, p > 1}$, or more generally λu + ∑_{i = 1}^ka_iu^pi, λ ? 0, a_i > 0 and p_i > 1 with appropriate upper bounds, and Ω a ball or an annulus.     

Approximation numbers of Sobolev imbeddings over unbounded domains

Let Ω ? $\text{R}$^N be an open set with $\text{dist}\text{(x, ?Ω) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?l}}\text{)}\text{for}\text{x ? Ω}$ and some l > 0 satisfying an additional regularity condition. We give asymptotic estimates for the approximation numbers α_n of Sobolev imbeddings

over these quasibounded domains Ω. Here

denotes the Sobolev space obtained by completing $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{staggered\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ under the usual Sobolev norm. We prove $\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(I}{}_{\mathrm{p,q}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?\gamma }}$, where

. There are quasibounded domains of this type where γ is the exact order of decay, in the case p ? q under the additional assumption that either 1 ? p ? q ? 2 or 2 ? p ? q ? ∞. This generalizes the known results for bounded domains which correspond to l = ∞. Similar results are indicated for the Kolmogorov and Gelfand numbers of I_p,q^m. As an application we give the rate of growth of the eigenvalues of certain elliptic differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$, where Ω is a quasibounded domain of the above type.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Singular perturbation problems for systems of partial differential equations of elliptic type

Elliptic boundary value problems for systems of nonlinear partial differential equations of the form $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x, u}{}_1\text{, u}{}_2\text{,…, u}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, ?}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = ?}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x), x ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, i = 1(1)N, j, k = 1(1)n, p_i ? 0, ? being a small parameter, with Dirichlet boundary conditions are considered. It is supposed that a formal approximation Z is given which satisfies the boundary conditions and the differential equations upto the order χ(?) = o(1) in some norm. Then, using the theory of differential inequalities, it is shown that under certain conditions the difference between the exact solution u of the boundary value problem and the formal approximation Z, taken in the sense of a suitable norm, can be made small.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.     

Some asymptotic boundary behavior of solutions of non-linear parabolic initial-boundary value problems

For parabolic initial boundary value problems various results such as $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{t\; \downarrow \; 0}}\text{{}\text{(}\text{?u}\text{t6x}\text{)(0, t)}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}\text{)(0, t)}}\text{= 1}$, where u satisfies $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{= a(u)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u(x, 0) = 0, u(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{satisfies}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?t}\text{) = α(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x, 0) = 0, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T,}\text{and}\text{α = a(0)}$, are demonstrated via the maximum principle and potential theoretic estimates.     

Kolmogorov-Landau inequalities for monotone functions

Presented in this report are two further applications of very elementary formulae of approximate differentiation. The first is a new derivation in a somewhat sharper form of the following theorem of V. M. Olovyani?nikov: LetN_n (n ? 2) be the class of functionsg(x) such thatg(x), g′(x),…, g⁽ⁿ⁾(x) are ? 0, bounded, and nondecreasing on the half-line ?∞ < x ? 0. A special element ofN_nis

$\text{g}{}_1\text{(x) = 0}\text{if}\text{?∞ < x < ?1, g}{}_1\text{(x) = (1 + x)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{if}\text{?1 ? x ? 0}$

. Ifg(x) ∈ N_nis such that

$\text{g(0) ? g}{}_1\text{(0) = 1, g}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(0) ? g}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(0) = n!}$

, then

$\text{g}{}^{\mathrm{(v)}}\text{(0) ? g}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{(v)}}\text{(0)}$

for

1$\text{v = 1,…, n ? 1}$

. Moreover, if we have equality in (1) for some value of v, then we have there equality for all v, and this happens only if $\text{g(x) = g}{}_1\text{(x)}$ in (?∞, 0].The second application gives sufficient conditions for the differentiability of asymptotic expansions (Theorem 4).     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

Finite differences versus finite elements for solving nonlinear integro-differential equations

Consider the nonlinear integro-differential equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, t) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t?τ)}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{σ(u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{(x, τ)) dτ + f(x, t)}$, 0 < x <, 0 < t < T, with appropriate initial and boundary conditions. This problem serves as a model for one-dimensional heat flow in materials with memory. The numerical solution via finite elements was discussed in B. Neta [J. Math. Anal. Appl.89 (1982), 598–611]. In this paper we compare the results obtained there with finite difference approximation from the point of view of accuracy and computer storage. It turns out that the finite difference method yields comparable results for the same mesh spacing using less computer storage.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

A variant of Poincaré's inequality

We show that if $\text{Ω?}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{N?2}$, is a bounded Lipschitz domain and $\text{(ρ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)?L}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{)}$ is a sequence of nonnegative radial functions weakly converging to δ₀ then there exist C>0 and n₀?1 such that

$\text{∫}\text{Ω}\text{f??}\text{∫}\text{Ω}\text{f}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?C}\text{∫}\text{Ω}\text{∫}\text{Ω}\text{|f(x)?f(y)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{|x?y|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{ρ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(|x?y|)}\text{d}\text{x}\text{d}\text{y}\text{?f∈L}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(Ω)}\text{?n?n}{}_0\text{.}$

The above estimate was suggested by some recent work of Bourgain, Brezis and Mironescu (in: Optimal Control and Partial Differential Equations, IOS Press, 2001, pp. 439–455). As n→∞ in (1) we recover Poincaré's inequality. We also extend a compactness result of Bourgain, Brezis and Mironescu. To cite this article: A.C. Ponce, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

Asymptotic profiles of solutions to convection–diffusion equations

The large time behavior of zero-mass solutions to the Cauchy problem for the convection–diffusion equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{+(|u|}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{=0,}\text{u(x,0)=u}{}_0\text{(x)}$ is studied when q>1 and the initial datum u₀ belongs to $\text{L}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}\text{,(1+|x|)}\text{d}\text{x)}$ and satisfies $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>R</mtext>}}\text{u}{}_0\text{(x)}\text{d}\text{x=0}$. We provide conditions on the size and shape of the initial datum u₀ as well as on the exponent q>1 such that the large time asymptotics of solutions is given either by the derivative of the Gauss–Weierstrass kernel, or by a self-similar solution of the equation, or by hyperbolic N-waves. To cite this article: S. Benachour et al., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 338 (2004).