Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

On the spatial theory of von Neumann algebras

If M is a von Neumann algebra in $\text{H}$, each faithful weight ψ on M′ defines an operator-valued weight ψ^?1 of $\text{L(H)}$ on M. For each weight ? on M the positive unbounded operator $\text{d?}\text{dψ}\text{= ? ° ψ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ satisfies all the usual properties of a Radon-Nikodym derivative.     

Proof of the conjecture of A. Grothendieck on the Fuglede-Kadison determinant

Let M be a von Neumann algebra with a faithful semifinite trace τ. For τ-compact elements x?M, Grothendieck introduced in “Séminaire Bourbaki,” 1955 a function Δ_{1 + x} generalizing the Fuglede-Kadison determinant, and conjectured that

$\text{Δ}{}_{\mathrm{1\; +\; ¦x\; +\; y¦}}\text{? Δ}{}_{\mathrm{1\; +\; ¦x¦}}\text{Δ}{}_{\mathrm{1+\; ¦y¦}}$

. In this paper, the inequality is proved. As a corollary, a direct proof of the Clarkson inequalities is obtained.     

The existence,uniqueness, and instability of spherically symmetric solutions of a system of reaction—Diffusion equations

The system $\text{?x}\text{?t}\text{= Δx + F(x,y),}\text{?y}\text{?t}\text{= G(x,y)}$ is investigated, where x and y are scalar functions of time (t ? 0), and n space variables $\text{(ξ}{}_1\text{,…, ξ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{), Δx ≡ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}^2\text{x}\text{?ξ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2$, and F and G are nonlinear functions. Under certain hypotheses on F and G it is proved that there exists a unique spherically symmetric solution $\text{(x(r),y(r)),}\text{where}\text{r = (ξ}{}_1{}^2\text{+ … + ξ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^2\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, which is bounded for r ? 0 and satisfies x(0) >x₀, y(0) > y₀, x′(0) = 0, y′(0) = 0, and x′ < 0, y′ > 0, ?r > 0. Thus, (x(r), y(r)) represents a time independent equilibrium solution of the system. Further, the linearization of the system restricted to spherically symmetric solutions, around (x(r), y(r)), has a unique positive eigenvalue. This is in contrast to the case n = 1 (i.e., one space dimension) in which zero is an eigenvalue. The uniqueness of the positive eigenvalue is used in the proof that the spherically symmetric solution described is unique.     

Randomness implies order

Let τ: [0, 1] → [0, 1] possess a unique invariant density $\text{f}{}^1$. Then given any ? > 0, we can find a density function p such that $\text{∥ p ? f}{}^1\text{∥ < ?,}\text{and}\text{p}$ is the invariant density of the stochastic difference equation x_{n + 1} = τ(x_n) + W, where W is a random variable. It follows that for all starting points $\text{x}{}_0\text{? [0, 1],}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{(1}\text{n)}\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{χ}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{p(ξ) dξ}$.     

Szegö limit theorems in quantum mechanics

We prove a Szegö-type theorem for some Schrödinger operators of the form $\text{H =}\text{?1}\text{2Δ}\text{+ V}$ with V smooth, positive and growing like $\text{V}{}_0\text{¦x¦}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{, k > 0}$. Namely, let π_λ be the orthogonal projection of L² onto the space of the eigenfunctions of H with eigenvalue ?λ; let A be a 0th order self-adjoint pseudo-differential operator relative to Beals-Fefferman weights $\text{?(x, ξ) = 1, Φ(x, ξ) = (1 + ¦ξ¦}{}^2\text{+ V(x))}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ and with total symbol a(x, ξ); and let f∈C($\text{R}$). Then

$\text{lim}\text{λ→∞}\text{1}\text{rank}\text{π}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{tr}\text{f(π}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{Aπ}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{)=}\text{lim}\text{λ→∞}\text{1}\text{vol}\text{(H(x, ξ)?λ)}\text{∫}\text{H?λ}\text{f(a(x, ξ))dxdξ}$

(assuming one limit exists).     

Subproper splitting for rectangular matrices

In this paper iterative schemes for approximating a solution to a rectangular but consistent linear system Ax = b are studied. Let A?C^{m × n}_r. The splitting A = M ? N is called subproper if R(A) ? R(M) and $\text{R(A}{}^1\text{) ?R(M}{}^1\text{)}$. Consider the iteration $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= M}{}^2\text{Nx}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+ M}{}^2\text{b}$. We characterize the convergence of this scheme to a solution of the linear system. When A?R^m×ⁿ_r, monotonicity and the concept of subproper regular splitting are used to determine a necessary and a sufficient condition for the scheme to converge to a solution.     

Weak convergence of compound stochastic process,I

Compound stochastic processes are constructed by taking the superpositive of independent copies of secondary processes, each of which is initiated at an epoch of a renewal process called the primary process. Suppose there are M possible k-dimensional secondary processes {ξ^v(t):t?0}, v=1,2,…,M. At each epoch of the renewal process {A(t):t?0} we initiate a random number of each of the M types. Let m_l:l?1} be a sequence of M-dimensional random vectors whose components specify the number of secondary processes of each type initiated at the various epochs. The compound process we study is

, where the ξ^v_lj() are independent copies of ξ^v,m_lv is the vth component of m and {τ_l:l?1} are the epochs of the renewal process. Our interest in this paper is to obtain functional central limit theorems for {Y(t):t?0} after appropriately scaling the time parameter and state space. A variety of applications are discussed.     

Canonical forms for linear systems

This paper considers canonical forms for the similarity action of Gl(n) on $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{={(A,B)∈}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{×}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{}}$:

$\text{Gl(n×∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{→∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}$

,

$\text{(H,(A,B))?(HAH}{}^{-1}\text{,HB)}$

Those canonical forms are obtained as an application of a more general method to select canonical elements M_c in the orbits $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$ of a matrix group G acting on a set of matrices $\text{M}\text{?}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$. We define a total order (?) on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, different from the lexicographic order ^l? [0^l?x ? x <0, but $\text{0?x≠0 for x∈}\text{R}\text{]}$ and consider normalized $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$-elements with a minimal number of parameters:

$\text{min{}\text{M}\text{?}\text{∈}\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{:}\text{M}\text{?}\text{normalized}}$

It is shown that the row and column echelon forms, the Jordan canonical form, and “nice” control canonical forms for reachable (A,B)-pairs have a homogeneous interpretation as such (?)-minimal orbit elements. Moreover new canonical forms for the general action (?) are determined via this method.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

A comparison result related to Gauss measureUn résultat de comparaison relatif à la mesure de Gauss

In this paper we prove a comparison result for weak solutions to linear elliptic problems of the type

where $\text{Ω}$ is an open set of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ (n?2), ?(x)=(2π)^?n/2exp(?|x|²/2), a_ij(x) are measurable functions such that a_ij(x)ξ_iξ_j??(x)|ξ|² a.e. $\text{x∈Ω}$, $\text{ξ∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ and f(x) is a measurable function taken in order to guarantee the existence of a solution $\text{u∈}\text{H}{}^1{}_0\text{(?,Ω)}$ of (1.1). We use the notion of rearrangement related to Gauss measure to compare u(x) with the solution of a problem of the same type, whose data are defined in a half-space and depend only on one variable. To cite this article: M.F. Betta et al., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 451–456.     

Temporal exponential decay for the Stark effect in atoms

Let $\text{H}{}_1\text{= ?∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{(Δ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+ V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)) + ∑}{}_{\mathrm{1\; ?\; i\; <j\; ?\; N}}\text{¦}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{, V(}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) = N ∝ ¦}\text{x}\text{?}\text{y}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{?(}\text{y}\text{)d}\text{y}$, with ? a normalized Gaussian. Suppose $\text{E}$ ≠ 0 and that $\text{H = H}{}_1\text{+}\text{E}\text{· (∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ has no eigenfunctions in L²($\text{R}$^3N. If H₁ψ = μψ with μ < infσ_ess(H₁), then (ψ, e^?itHψ) decays exponentially at a rate governed by the positions of the resonances of H.     

The approximation of flows

Let U, V be two strongly continuous one-parameter groups of bounded operators on a Banach space $\text{X}$ with corresponding infinitesimal generators S, T. We prove the following: ∥U_t, ? V_t ∥ = O(t), t → 0, if and only if U = V; ∥U_t ? V_t∥ = O(t^α), t → 0; with 0 ? α ? 1, if and only if $\text{S = Ω(T + P)Ω}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, where Ω, P, are bounded operators on $\text{X}$ such that $\text{∥U}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{Ω ? ΩU}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∥ = O(t}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{), ∥U}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{P ? PU}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∥ = ?O(t}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{), t → 0; ∥U}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∥ = O(t)}$ if and only if $\text{S}{}^1\text{? T}{}^1$ has a bounded extension to $\text{X}$¹. Further results of this nature are inferred for semigroups, reflexive spaces, Hilbert spaces, and von Neumann algebras.     

Spectral representation for Schrödinger operators with long-range potentials

A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R³, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(1</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, grad $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(3</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, $\text{ΛV(x) = O(¦ x}\text{s}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?\delta }}\text{) (δ > 0), Λ}$ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator $\text{F}$ from PL₂(R³) onto $\text{L}{}_2\text{((0, ∞); L}{}_2\text{(Ω)), P}$ being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),

$\text{(α(H)(Pf,g)=}\text{∫}\text{0}\text{∞}\text{(α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L}{}_2\text{(ω) dλ}$

.     

An asymptotic evaluation of the cycle index of a symmetric group

Let $\text{Z(S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{;?(x))}$ denote the polynomial obtained from the cycle index of the symmetric group Z(S_n) by replacing each variable s_i by f(x¹). Let f(x) have a Taylor series with radius of convergence ? of the form f(x)=x^k + a_k+1x^k+1 + a_k+2x^k+2+? with every a₁?0. Finally, let 0<x<1 and let x??. We prove that

This limit is used to estimate the probability (for n and p both large) that a point chosen at random from a random p-point tree has degree n + 1. These limiting probabilities are independent of p and decrease geometrically in n, contrasting with the labeled limiting probabilities of $\text{1}\text{n!e}$.In order to prove the main theorem, an appealing generalization of the principle of inclusion and exclusion is presented.     

On Guerra's broken replica-symmetry bound

Consider a random Hamiltonian $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}\text{)}$ for $\text{σ}\text{→}\text{∈Σ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{={0,1}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{.}$ We assume that the family $\text{(H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}\text{))}$ is jointly Gaussian centered and that for $\text{σ}\text{→}{}^1\text{,}\text{σ}\text{→}{}^2\text{∈Σ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}$$\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{EH}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}{}^1\text{)H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}{}^2\text{)}$ =ξ(N^?1∑_i?Nσ¹_iσ²_i) for a certain function ξ on $\text{R}$. F. Guerra proved the remarkable fact that the free energy of the system with Hamiltonian $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}\text{)+h∑}{}_{\mathrm{i?N}}\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$ is bounded below by the free energy of the Parisi solution provided that ξ is convex on $\text{R}$. We prove that this fact remains (asymptotically) true when the function ξ is only assumed to be convex on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. This covers in particular the case of the p-spin interaction model for any p. To cite this article: M. Talagrand, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

An integral operator connected with the Helmholtz equation

Let Lu be the integral operator defined by $\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{k?}}\text{)(x, y) = ∝ s ∝ ?(x′, y′)(}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{ik?}}\text{?}\text{) dx′ dy′, (x, y) ? S}$ where S is the interior of a smooth, closed Jordan curve in the plane, k is a complex number with Re k ? 0, Im k ? 0, and ?² = (x ?x′)² + (y ? y′)². We define $\text{q(x, y) = [}\text{dist}\text{((x, y), ?S)]}\text{1}\text{2}\text{, (x, y) ? S; L}{}_2\text{(q, S) = {? : ∝ s ∝ ¦ ?(x, y)¦}{}^2\text{q(x, y) dx dy < ∞}; W}{}_2{}^1\text{(q, S) = {? : ? ? L}{}_2\text{(q, S),}\text{??}\text{?x}\text{,}\text{?f}\text{?y}\text{? L}{}_2\text{(q, S)}}$, where in the definition of W₂¹(q, S) the derivatives are taken in the sense of distributions. We prove that L_k is a continuous 1-l mapping of L₂(q, S) onto W₂¹(q, S).     

Capacitance and the conformal module of quadrilaterals

Let ? be defined on T^r and have an absolutely convergent Fourier series

. Set $\text{∥?∥ = ∑ ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦}$. In this paper the problem of determining the limit of $\text{∥?}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}$, as n → ∞, is studied.     

Temporally inhomogeneous scattering theory

A theory of scattering for the time dependent evolution equations $\text{du}\text{dt}\text{= iH}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t)u, j = 0, 1}$ (¹) is developed. The wave operators are defined in terms of the evolution operators U_j(t, s), which govern (¹). The scattering operator remains unitary. Sufficient conditions for existence and completeness of the wave operators are obtained; these are the main results. General properties, such as the chain rule and various intertwining relations, are also established. Applications include potential scattering (H₀(t) = ?Δ, Δ denoting the Laplacian, and H₁(t) = ?Δ + q(t, ·)) and scattering for second-order differential operators with coefficients constant in the spatial variable ($\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t) = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{m,\; k\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{mk}}{}^{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{(t)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + b}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t)}\text{for}\text{j = 0, 1}$).